[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46250-46254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-17590]



[[Page 46250]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment 
Request

AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury; 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); and Office of Thrift Supervision 
(OTS), Treasury.

ACTION: Joint notice and request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the OCC, the Board, the FDIC, and 
the OTS (the ``agencies'') may not conduct or sponsor, and the 
respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection 
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) control number. The Federal Financial Institutions Examination 
Council (FFIEC), of which the agencies are members, has approved the 
agencies' publication for public comment of proposed revisions to the 
Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) for banks 
and the Thrift Financial Report (TFR) for savings associations, which 
are currently approved collections of information. At the end of the 
comment period, the comments and recommendations received will be 
analyzed to determine the extent to which the FFIEC should modify the 
proposed revisions prior to giving its final approval. The agencies 
will then submit the revisions to OMB for review and approval.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 10, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
any or all of the agencies. All comments, which should refer to the OMB 
control number(s), will be shared among the agencies.
    OCC: Written comments should be submitted to the Communications 
Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., 
Public Information Room, Mailstop 1-5, Attention: 1557-0081, 
Washington, DC 20219. Due to temporary disruptions in the OCC's mail 
service, commenters are encouraged to submit comments by fax or 
electronic mail. Comments may be sent by fax to (202) 874-4448, or by 
electronic mail to [email protected]. Comments will be 
available for inspection and photocopying at the OCC's Public 
Information Room, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. Call (202) 
874-5043 to make appointments for inspection of comments.
    Board: Written comments, which should refer to ``Consolidated 
Reports of Condition and Income, 7100-0036,'' may be mailed to Ms. 
Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. Due to 
temporary disruptions in the Board's mail service, commenters are 
encouraged to submit comments by electronic mail to 
[email protected]. Comments addressed to Ms. Johnson 
also may be delivered to the Board's mailroom between 8:45 a.m. and 
5:15 p.m. weekdays, and to the security control room outside of those 
hours. Both the mailroom and the security control room are accessible 
from the Eccles Building courtyard entrance on 20th Street between 
Constitution Avenue and C Street, NW. Comments received may be 
inspected in room M-P-500 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays 
pursuant to sections 261.12 and 261.14 of the Board's Rules Regarding 
Availability of Information, 12 CFR 261.12 and 261.14.
    FDIC: Written comments should be addressed to Robert E. Feldman, 
Executive Secretary, Attention: Comments/Legal Division, Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20429. All comments should refer to ``Consolidated Reports of Condition 
and Income, 3064-0052.'' Due to temporary disruptions in the FDIC's 
mail service, commenters are encouraged to submit comments by fax or 
electronic mail [Fax number: (202) 898-3838; Internet address: 
[email protected]]. Comments also may be hand-delivered to the guard 
station at the rear of the 550 17th Street Building (located on F 
Street) on business days between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Comments may be 
inspected and photocopied in the FDIC Public Information Center, Room 
100, 801 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. 
on business days.
    OTS: Submit comments by mail to: Information Collection Comments, 
Chief Counsel's Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552; by hand delivery to the Guard's Desk, east 
lobby entrance 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, on business 
days between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.; by facsimile transmission: (202) 906-
6518; or by electronic mail to: [email protected]. 
All comments should refer to ``TFR Revisions, OMB No. 1550-0023,'' and 
include your name and phone number. Comments submitted to OTS and the 
related TFR schedules will be posted on the OTS Internet site at: 
http://www.ots.treas.gov. In addition, interested persons may inspect 
comments at the Public Reference Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20552, by appointment. To make an appointment, call 202-906-5922. 
Appointments will be scheduled on business days between 10 a.m. and 4 
p.m.
    Acopy of the comments may also be submitted to the OMB desk officer 
for the agencies: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive 
Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 or electronic mail to 
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sample copies of the proposed new 
schedule for the Call Report for March 31, 2003, can be obtained at the 
FFIEC's web site (www.ffiec.gov) or may be requested from the agency 
clearance officers listed below for the OCC, the Board, and the FDIC. 
Sample copies of the proposed new schedule for the TFR for March 31, 
2003, can be obtained at the OTS' web site (www.ots.treas.gov) or may 
be requested from the agency clearance officer listed below for the 
OTS.
    OCC: Jessie Dunaway, OCC Clearance Officer, or Camille Dixon, (202) 
874-5090, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office of the 
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219.
    Board: Mary M. West, Board Clearance Officer, (202) 452-3829, 
Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. 
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may call (202) 263-
4869.
    FDIC: Tamara R. Manly, Management Analyst, (202) 898-7453, Legal 
Division, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20429.
    OTS: William Magrini, Senior Project Manager, Supervision Policy, 
at (202) 906-5744 or by electronic mail

[[Page 46251]]

[email protected], or Marilyn K. Burton, OTS Paperwork 
Clearance Officer, at (202) 906-6467 or by electronic mail 
[email protected], Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Request for OMB approval to extend, with 
revisions, the following currently approved collections of information 
for banks and savings associations.
    The agencies estimate that only approximately 130 banks and savings 
associations (banking institutions) have significant subprime lending 
programs and would have to complete the entire proposed subprime 
lending schedule. The agencies further estimate that each of these 
institutions would need approximately 1 to 1.5 hours to complete this 
schedule. In addition, other banking institutions with any subprime 
lending programs would have to complete only a single item on the 
schedule. Although the agencies do not have an estimate of the number 
of such banking institutions, they believe that this item would add 
only a negligible amount of burden. The following burden estimates 
include the proposed revisions.
    1. Report Title: Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call 
Report).
    Form Number: FFIEC 031 (for banks with domestic and foreign 
offices) and FFIEC 041 (for banks with domestic offices only).
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    For OCC:
    OMB Number: 1557-0081.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,200 national banks.
    Estimated Time per Response: 42.05 burden hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 370,076 burden hours.
    For Board:
    OMB Number: 7100-0036.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 978 state member banks.
    Estimated Time per Response: 48.25 burden hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 188,754 burden hours.
    For FDIC:
    OMB Number: 3064-0052.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,480 insured state nonmember 
banks.
    Estimated Time per Response: 32.66 burden hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 715,993 burden hours.
    The estimated time per response is an average, which varies by 
agency because of differences in the composition of the banks under 
each agency's supervision (e.g., size distribution of institutions, 
types of activities in which they are engaged, and number of banks with 
foreign offices). The time per response for a bank is estimated to 
range from 15 to 550 hours, depending on individual circumstances.
    2. Report Title: Thrift Financial Report (TFR).
    Form Number: OTS 1313 (for savings associations).
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Affected public: Business or other for profit.

    For OTS:
    OMB Number: 1550-0023.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,000 savings associations.
Estimated Time per Response: 33.8 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 135,200 burden hours.

General Description of Reports

    These information collections are mandatory: 12 U.S.C. 161 (for 
national banks), 12 U.S.C. 324 (for state member banks), 12 U.S.C. 1817 
(for insured state nonmember commercial and savings banks), and 12 
U.S.C. 1464 (for savings associations). Except for the items covered in 
this proposal and a limited number of other items, these information 
collections are not given confidential treatment. Small businesses 
(i.e., small banks and savings associations) are affected.

Abstract

    Banks file Call Reports and savings associations file the TFR with 
the agencies each quarter for the agencies' use in monitoring the 
condition, performance, and risk profile of reporting individual 
banking institutions and the industry as a whole. In addition, Call 
Reports and TFRs provide the most current statistical data available 
for evaluating banking institutions' corporate applications such as 
those for mergers, for identifying areas of focus for both on-site and 
off-site examinations, and for monetary and other public policy 
purposes. Call Reports and TFRs also are used to calculate all banking 
institutions' deposit insurance and Financing Corporation assessments, 
national banks' semiannual assessment fees, and OTS' assessments on 
savings associations.

Current Action

I. Overview

    The agencies are requesting comment on a proposed revision to the 
Call Report and the TFR that will enable the agencies to better plan 
their examinations of banking institutions and to monitor off-site the 
extent of, changes in, and performance of subprime lending programs at 
banking institutions. Subprime lending refers to loans to borrowers who 
have weakened credit histories. The characteristics of a subprime 
borrower typically include a history of paying debts late, personal 
bankruptcy filings, or a high debt service-to-income ratio. These 
borrowers, therefore, pose a higher risk of default than do traditional 
borrowers at banking institutions. A subprime lending program is the 
regular or targeted acquisition, through origination or purchase, of 
loans to subprime borrowers that will be held in portfolio or 
accumulated for resale.
    In May 2000, the OCC, the Board, and the FDIC \1\ and, in August 
2000, the OTS \2\ proposed to collect information on subprime lending 
in the Call Report and TFR to make possible the early detection and 
proper supervision of subprime lending through off-site monitoring 
procedures. Banks involved in subprime lending would have reported 
quarter-end data for eight categories of subprime loans as well as past 
due and nonaccrual information and year-to-date charge-offs and 
recoveries for two broader categories of subprime loans. The agencies 
recognized that the quality and validity of the proposed Call Report 
and TFR information depended on a workable definition of subprime 
lending, which was still in the process of development at that time. 
The definition of subprime included in the 2000 proposals was based on 
the definition of the term in the agencies' March 1999 guidance on 
subprime lending. The agencies also asked for comment on whether 
information should be collected based on loan portfolios or programs 
that possess subprime characteristics or individual loans with these 
characteristics.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 65 FR 34801, May 31, 2000.
    \2\ 65 FR 48049, August 4, 2000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The comments received in 2000 on the proposed collections of 
information on subprime lending in the Call Report and TFR were 
generally unfavorable, particularly with respect to the agencies' then 
proposed definition. Furthermore, the commenters overwhelmingly stated 
that if the agencies did collect subprime lending information, the 
information should only be collected from banks with subprime lending 
programs. In addition, the commenters suggested that future requests 
for comment on a subprime information collection for the Call Report 
and TFR should be

[[Page 46252]]

addressed in a separate proposal dealing only with the subprime 
information collection issues.
    Over the last two years, the agencies have conducted examinations 
that have confirmed the agencies' contentions that subprime lending 
programs continue to pose an increased risk to those institutions 
involved and to the deposit insurance funds. A disproportionate number 
of the banking institutions on the FDIC's ``problem institution'' list 
during the past two years have been engaged in subprime lending 
programs and the volume of loans in these programs has exceeded 25 
percent of the institutions' Tier 1 capital.\3\ The exact number of 
institutions involved in subprime lending programs is not known with 
certainty. However, the agencies estimate that approximately 130 
banking institutions currently have significant exposures in the 
subprime lending business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In general, Tier 1 capital is the sum of a banking 
institution's common stockholders' equity (as defined in the 
agencies' regulatory capital standards), noncumulative perpetual 
preferred stock, and minority interests in consolidated 
subsidiaries, less goodwill and other intangible assets (other than 
limited amounts of servicing assets and purchased credit card 
relationships) and less disallowed deferred tax assets and 
disallowed credit-enhancing interest-only strips. For banks, see 
Schedule RC-R of the Call Report to calculate Tier 1 capital. For 
savings associations, see Schedule CCR of the TFR to calculate Tier 
1 capital.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The actual extent of banking institutions' involvement in subprime 
lending programs is not fully known because there is no regular 
periodic reporting of this activity to the banking agencies. The 
estimates that have been made come from examination data, but the 
quality and timeliness of the subprime lending data derived from 
examination reports is constrained by the lack of standard industry-
wide definitions of the terms ``subprime'' and ``program'' and by the 
length of the examination cycle. The issue of timeliness is 
particularly troublesome from a safety and soundness perspective 
because subprime lending programs tend to be a volume-oriented business 
that encourages rapid portfolio growth. Consequently, there is no 
reliable way to regularly monitor individual institutions' subprime 
lending programs between examinations.

II. Current Proposal

    This proposal addresses solely the agencies' planned collection of 
information on subprime consumer lending programs each quarter in the 
Call Report and TFR beginning March 31, 2003. The agencies continue to 
believe that a need exists to collect information on subprime lending 
programs. This information would be the agencies' sole source of off-
site data on subprime lending programs. One purpose for which the 
agencies intend to use these data is to enhance the examination 
planning process. In addition, the data would provide the agencies with 
a timely and regular source of information from institutions with 
subprime consumer lending programs that can be used to monitor the 
extent of banking institutions' involvement in such programs, including 
the level of growth in this activity, and the performance of subprime 
portfolios.
Definitions
    Subsequent to the 2000 proposals, the agencies issued Expanded 
Guidance for Subprime Lending Programs on January 31, 2001. This 
guidance contains definitions that describe the characteristics of the 
terms ``program'' and ``subprime.'' Examiners have been using these 
characteristics during the examination process to determine which 
institutions have subprime lending programs that, in the aggregate, are 
greater than or equal to 25 percent of an institution's Tier 1 capital. 
The agencies propose to use the characteristics described in the 
Expanded Guidance in the proposed subprime lending program information 
collection in the Call Report and TFR. These two terms would be defined 
as follows for purposes of the proposed new schedule:
    The term ``program'' refers to the process of acquiring on a 
regular or targeted basis, through either origination or purchase, 
loans to subprime borrowers that are to be held in the institution's 
own portfolio or accumulated and packaged for sale. The average credit 
risk profile of such programs or portfolios will likely display 
significantly higher delinquency and/or loss rates than prime 
portfolios.
    Subprime programs include loan products that attract a 
disproportionate number of borrowers with weakened credit histories, 
including payday loan and credit repair products. A subprime program 
also may include cases where an institution regularly purchases loans, 
such as indirect auto paper, of which disproportionate amounts qualify 
as loans to subprime borrowers. In addition, an institution should 
include any program determined to be a subprime lending program by its 
primary federal regulator. If a reporting institution has a question as 
to whether it has a subprime lending program, it should contact its 
primary federal regulator.
    The term ``subprime'' refers to the credit characteristics of 
individual borrowers. Subprime borrowers typically have weakened credit 
histories that include payment delinquencies, and possibly more severe 
problems such as charge-offs, judgments, and bankruptcies. The 
borrowers may also display reduced repayment capacity as measured by 
credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, or other criteria that may 
encompass borrowers with incomplete credit histories. Subprime loans 
are loans to borrowers displaying one or more of these characteristics 
at the time of origination or purchase. Such loans have a higher risk 
of default than loans to prime borrowers. Generally, subprime borrowers 
will display a range of credit risk characteristics that may include 
one or more of the following:
     Two or more 30-day delinquencies in the last 12 months, or 
one or more 60-day delinquencies in the last 24 months;
     Judgment, foreclosure, repossession, or charge-off in the 
prior 24 months;
     Bankruptcy in the last 5 years;
     Relatively high default probability as evidenced by, for 
example, a credit bureau risk score (FICO) of 660 or below (depending 
on the product/collateral), or other bureau or proprietary scores with 
an equivalent default probability likelihood; and/or
     Debt service-to-income ratio of 50% or greater, or 
otherwise limited ability to cover family living expenses after 
deducting total monthly debt-service requirements from monthly income.
    This list is illustrative rather than exhaustive and does not 
define specific parameters for all subprime borrowers. Institutions 
that have identified borrowers as ``subprime'' based on their own 
internal rating systems should be reported as such.
    For purposes of reporting on the proposed schedule, subprime 
lending does not refer to individual subprime loans originated and 
managed, in the ordinary course of business, as occasional exceptions 
to prime risk selection standards. Additionally, this definition 
generally does not apply to the following:
     Prime loans that develop credit problems after 
acquisition.
     Loans initially extended in subprime programs that are 
later upgraded, because of their performance, to programs targeted to 
prime borrowers.
     Community development loans as defined in the Community 
Reinvestment Act regulations that may have some higher risk 
characteristics, but are otherwise mitigated by guarantees from 
government programs,

[[Page 46253]]

private credit enhancements, or other appropriate risk mitigation 
techniques.
     Institutions that extend credit to subprime borrowers as 
part of their standard community lending process or make loans to 
subprime borrowers as an occasional exception.
Scope of Schedule
    Subprime lending, by the nature of the definition, is concentrated 
in the consumer-lending arena. Thus, the proposed schedule covers only 
information on consumer loans. Furthermore, the agencies are proposing 
that only banking institutions that are programmatic lenders of 
subprime consumer loans should complete some or all of this schedule. 
Banking institutions that do not have any subprime consumer lending 
programs will not be required to provide any information on this 
schedule.
    All banking institutions that have any subprime consumer lending 
programs would be required to report the total dollar amount 
outstanding of loans in those programs as of the quarter-end report 
date in Part I, item 1. However, only those banking institutions where 
the total dollar amount outstanding is greater than or equal to 25 
percent of the reporting institution's Tier 1 capital as of the report 
date would be required to complete the detailed items in Parts II, III, 
and IV of the schedule discussed below. Once an institution reaches the 
25 percent of Tier 1 capital threshold, it must continue to complete 
Parts II, III, and IV of the schedule until it fails to meet the Tier 1 
capital threshold for two consecutive quarter-end report dates or for 
the remainder of the calendar year, whichever is longer.
Detailed Items
    The proposed detailed items in Parts II, III, and IV of the 
schedule would allow the agencies to perform off-site monitoring of the 
performance of banking institutions with significant exposures to 
subprime lending. Because these parts of the schedule would be 
completed only by banking institutions with subprime lending programs 
of at least 25 percent of Tier 1 capital, the schedule would minimize 
the information collected from banking institutions with small volumes 
of loans in subprime lending programs.
    Part II collects a breakdown of the total dollar amount of loans in 
subprime consumer lending programs as of the report date into the 
following consumer loan categories: open-end and closed-end loans 
secured by 1-4 family residential properties (with first and junior 
lien closed-end loans reported separately), credit card loans, loans 
extended under other revolving credit plans, and other consumer loans. 
The sum of the amounts outstanding by loan category must equal the 
total dollar amount reported in Part I.
    Part III requires the same breakout of past due and nonaccrual 
loans as required in Schedule RC-N of the Call Report and Schedule PD 
of the TFR (i.e., loans past due 30-89 days and still accruing, loans 
past due 90 days or more and still accruing, and nonaccrual loans) for 
each category of loans reported in Part II of this schedule. However, 
loans extended under revolving credit plans other than credit cards and 
other consumer loans are combined rather than reported separately.
    Part IV requires the separate reporting of charge-offs and 
recoveries as in Schedule RI-B of the Call Report and Schedule VA of 
the TFR for the same loan categories as in Part III.

III. Confidentiality

    The agencies are proposing that the information reported in this 
schedule be accorded confidential treatment on an individual 
institution basis. The information requested will provide the agencies 
with sensitive business data that is needed to aid examiners and 
supervisory analysts in better evaluating the risk profiles and 
performance of banking institutions with concentrations of subprime 
lending programs. This information also will be used to plan the detail 
and timing of examinations and to provide the agencies with a timely 
and regular source of information on subprime lending programs, which 
is not currently available.
    The agencies believe that confidential treatment initially should 
be accorded this information collection because, notwithstanding the 
Examiner Guidance on Subprime Lending, there is no standard industry-
wide approach to the definitions of either ``subprime'' or ``program,'' 
which means that the meanings of these terms are institution-specific. 
Thus, the reported information will not be entirely comparable from one 
institution to the next, leading to potential misinterpretation of the 
data by the public.
    The proposal will not result in the collection of data on all loans 
to subprime borrowers, but only on subprime lending programs. This 
outcome occurs because of the supervisory and examination, rather than 
statistical, focus of the proposed schedule. Moreover, because the 
focus is also on programs rather than individual loans, attempts to 
aggregate the reported data across institutions will not provide users 
with statistics on the overall volume of subprime loans held by banking 
institutions. For this same reason, the reported data will not reveal 
whether an individual institution does or does not have loans to 
subprime borrowers, nor will it reveal the entire amount of the 
institution's loans to subprime borrowers. As a consequence, care must 
be taken in interpreting the reported data to avoid reaching improper 
conclusions.
    Furthermore, different institutions may reach different conclusions 
as to whether one or more of their consumer lending programs are 
subprime programs and, accordingly, whether their subprime lending 
programs aggregate 25 percent or more of their Tier 1 capital. The 
agencies therefore believe that some period of time is needed to ensure 
that banking institutions understand the proposed definitions and how 
they may apply to their various lending programs. This will also enable 
examiners to determine whether institutions are properly applying these 
definitions and correctly reporting the data.
    The agencies also have some concern, due to the sensitive nature of 
these data, that the release of the subprime lending information before 
banking institutions and the agencies have adequate experience with it 
could inhibit the collection of accurate and complete data in the 
future. Until any potential problems with the newly reported data have 
been addressed, the agencies believe there is a risk that the data will 
be misinterpreted and that their release at this time could cause 
potential harm to an institution or an increased risk to deposit 
insurance funds. The agencies are initially proposing confidential 
treatment for the proposed new schedule. However, after experience has 
been gained with the data, e.g., after six or eight quarters, the 
agencies will reevaluate whether this treatment should be retained.

IV. Request for Comment

    Public comment is requested on all aspects of this proposal. In 
addition, comments are invited on:
    (a) Whether the proposed revisions to the Call Report and TFR 
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of 
the agencies' functions, including whether the information has 
practical utility;
    (b) The accuracy of the agencies' estimates of the burden of the 
information collections as they are proposed to be revised, including 
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

[[Page 46254]]

    (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected;
    (d) Ways to minimize the burden of information collections on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
    (e) Estimates of capital or start up costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
    Comments submitted in response to this Notice will be shared among 
the agencies and will be summarized or included in the agencies' 
requests for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public 
record. Written comments should address the accuracy of the burden 
estimates and ways to minimize burden as well as other relevant aspects 
of the information collection request.

    Dated: July 3, 2002.
Mark J. Tenhundfeld,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, 
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 5, 2002.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.

    Dated at Washington, DC, this 8th day of July, 2002.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Valerie Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.

Deborah Dakin,
Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations and Legislation Division, Office of 
Thrift Supervision.
[FR Doc. 02-17590 Filed 7-11-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P, 6210-01-P, 6714-01-P, 6720-01-P