[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45588-45625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-12771]



[[Page 45587]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





Environmental Protection Agency





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



40 CFR Part 63



National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire 
Manufacturing; Final Rule

  Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2002 / Rules 
and Regulations  

[[Page 45588]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[FRL-7214-7]
RIN 2060-AG29


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber 
Tire Manufacturing

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action finalizes national emission standards for 
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for new and existing sources at 
rubber tire manufacturing facilities. The EPA has identified rubber 
tire manufacturing facilities as major sources of hazardous air 
pollutants (HAP) emissions. These standards will implement section 
112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring all such major sources 
to meet HAP emission standards that reflect the application of maximum 
achievable control technology (MACT). The primary HAP that will be 
controlled with this action include toluene and hexane. These HAP are 
associated with a variety of adverse health effects including chronic 
health disorders (e.g., polyneuropathy, degenerative lesions of the 
nasal cavity) and acute health disorders (e.g., respiratory irritation, 
headaches).

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 9, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Docket. All information considered by the EPA in developing 
this rulemaking, including public comments on the proposed rule and 
other information developed by the EPA in addressing those comments 
since proposal, is located in Public Docket No. A-97-14 at the 
following address: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center 
(6102), U.S. EPA, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460. The docket 
is located at the above address in Room M-1500, Waterside Mall (ground 
floor), and may be inspected from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. Materials related to this rulemaking 
are available upon request from the Air and Radiation Docket and 
Information Center by calling (202) 260-7548 or 7549. The FAX number 
for the Center is (202) 260-4400. A reasonable fee may be charged for 
copying docket materials.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning 
applicability and rule determinations, contact your State or local 
regulatory agency representative or the appropriate EPA Regional Office 
representative. For information concerning analyses performed in 
developing this rule, contact Mr. Anthony Wayne, Policy, Planning and 
Standards Group, Emission Standards Division (C439-04), U.S. EPA, 
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone number (919) 
541-5439; fax number (919) 541-0942; electronic mail address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Judicial Review. Under CAA section 307(b), judicial review of the 
final NESHAP is available only by filing a petition for review in the 
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on or before 
September 9, 2002. Only those objections to the NESHAP which were 
raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment 
may be raised during judicial review. Under section 307(b)(2)of the 
CAA, the requirements established by today's final action may not be 
challenged separately in any civil or criminal proceeding we bring to 
enforce these requirements.
    Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated 
by this action include:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Category                     SIC \a\         NAICS \b\                                   Regulated entities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry...............................            3011           326211   Rubber tire manufacturing facilities.
                                                   7534           326212
                                                   2296           314992
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Standard Industrial Classification.
\b\ North American Information Classification System.

    This list is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this 
action. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action, 
you should examine the applicability criteria in Sec. 63.5981 of the 
rule. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action 
to a particular entity, consult your State or local agency (or EPA 
Regional Office) described in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section.
    Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket, 
an electronic copy of this final rule will also be available on the WWW 
through the Technology Transfer Network (TTN). Following signature, a 
copy of the rule will be posted on the TTN's policy and guidance page 
for newly proposed or promulgated rules http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg.
    Outline. The information in this preamble is organized as follows:

I. Background
    A. What Is the Source of Authority for Development of NESHAP?
    B. What Criteria Are Used In the Development of NESHAP?
    C. How Did the Public Participate in Developing the Rule?
II. Summary of the Final Rule
III. Significant Comments and Changes Since Proposal
    A. What Sources Are Subject to the Rule?
    B. How Did We Determine MACT?
    C. Can EPA Provide a Universal Certification Compliance 
Alternative?
    D. What Role Should EPA Method 311 Play in Compliance 
Determinations?
    E. How Should the Tire Cord Compliance Requirements Address 
Potential Mixing Reactions?
    F. What Data Requirements Should Sources Using Continuous 
Parameter Monitoring Systems Meet?
    G. Is Compliance Based on Daily Recordkeeping Needed?
    H. Has EPA Properly Considered the Cost Impacts of the Rule?
    I. What Other Changes Has EPA Made for the Final Rule?
    J. What Are the Environmental, Cost, and Economic Impacts of the 
Final Rule?
IV. Administrative Requirements
    A. Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Executive Order 13045 -Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    C. Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination with 
Indian Tribal Governments
    D. Executive Order 13132--Federalism
    E. Executive Order 13211--Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    G. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
    H. Paperwork Reduction Act
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
    J. Congressional Review Act

[[Page 45589]]

I. Background

A. What Is the Source of Authority for Development of NESHAP?

    Section 112 of the CAA requires us to list categories and 
subcategories of major sources and area sources of HAP and to establish 
NESHAP for the listed source categories and subcategories. The category 
of major sources covered by today's final rule was listed on July 16, 
1992 (57 FR 31576). Major source means any stationary source or group 
of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common 
control that emits or has the potential to emit, considering controls, 
10 tons per year (tons/yr) or more of any one HAP or 25 tons/yr or more 
of any combination of HAP.

B. What Criteria Are Used in the Development of NESHAP?

    Section 112 of the CAA requires that we establish NESHAP for the 
control of HAP from both new and existing major sources. The CAA 
requires the NESHAP to reflect the maximum degree of reduction in 
emissions of HAP that is achievable. This level of control is commonly 
referred to as the maximum achievable control technology (MACT).
    The MACT floor is the minimum control level allowed for NESHAP and 
is defined under section 112(d)(3) of the CAA. In essence, the MACT 
floor ensures that the standard is set at a level that assures that all 
major sources achieve the level of control at least as stringent as 
that already achieved by the better-controlled and lower-emitting 
sources in each source category or subcategory. For new sources, the 
MACT floor cannot be less stringent that the emission control that is 
achieved in practice by the best-controlled similar source. The MACT 
standards for existing sources can be less stringent than standards for 
new sources, but they cannot be less stringent than the average 
emission limitation achieved by the best-performing 12 percent of 
existing sources in the category or subcategory (or the best-performing 
5 sources for categories or subcategories with fewer than 30 sources).
    In developing MACT, we also consider control options that are more 
stringent than the floor. We may establish standards more stringent 
than the floor based on consideration of the cost of achieving the 
emission reductions, any health and environmental impacts, and energy 
requirements.

C. How Did the Public Participate in Developing the Rule?

    Prior to proposal, we met with industry representatives and State 
regulatory authorities several times to discuss the data and 
information used to develop the proposed standards. In addition, these 
and other potential stakeholders, including equipment vendors and 
environmental groups, had opportunity to comment on the proposed 
standards.
    The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on October 
18, 2000 (65 FR 62414). The preamble to the proposed rule discussed the 
availability of technical support documents, which described in detail 
the information gathered during the standards development process. 
Public comments were solicited at proposal.
    We received 19 public comment letters on the proposed rule. The 
commenters represent the following affiliations: Rubber tire 
manufacturers (4 companies), industrial trade associations (5), and one 
State and local agency association. In the post-proposal period, we 
talked with commenters and other stakeholders to clarify comments and 
to assist in our analysis of the comments. Records of these contacts 
are found in docket A-97-14. All of the comments have been carefully 
considered, and, where appropriate, changes have been made for the 
final rule.

II. Summary of Final Rule

    The rule will apply to existing, new and reconstructed rubber tire 
manufacturing facilities that are major sources of HAP emissions 
standing alone or are major sources due to collocation with other 
facilities that emit HAP. We have subcategorized the rubber tire 
manufacturing source category into the following four subcategories of 
affected sources:

 Rubber processing
 Tire production
 Tire cord production
 Puncture sealant application.

    Table 1 summarizes the emission limit options for the tire 
production, tire cord production, and puncture sealant application 
affected sources. There are no emission limits or other requirements 
associated with rubber processing affected sources.

                              Table 1.--Emission Limit Options for Affected Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Affected source                               Pollutant                               Limitaa
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing, new or reconstructed tire  Selected organic HAP (See Table 16 of final      Emissions must not exceed
 production facility--Option 1.       rule).                                           1,000 grams per megagram
                                                                                       (2 pounds per ton) of the
                                                                                       total cements and
                                                                                       solvents used.
                                     All other organic HAP..........................  Emissions must not exceed
                                                                                       10,000 grams per megagram
                                                                                       (20 pounds per ton) of
                                                                                       the total cements and
                                                                                       solvents used.
Existing, new or reconstructed tire  All organic HAP................................  Emissions must not exceed
 production facility--Option 2.                                                        0.024 grams per megagram
                                                                                       (0.00005 pounds per ton)
                                                                                       of rubber used.
Existing tire cord production        All organic HAP................................  Emissions must not exceed
 facility--Option 1.                                                                   280 grams per megagram
                                                                                       (0.56 pounds per ton) of
                                                                                       fabric processed.
New or reconstructed tire cord       All organic HAP................................  Emissions must not exceed
 production facility--Option 1.                                                        220 grams per megagram
                                                                                       (0.43 pounds per ton) of
                                                                                       fabric processed.
Existing, new or reconstructed tire  Selected organic HAP (See Table 16 of final      Emissions must not exceed
 cord production facility--Option 2.  rule).                                           1,000 grams HAP per
                                                                                       megagram (2 pounds per
                                                                                       ton) of total coatings
                                                                                       used.
                                     All other organic HAP..........................  Emissions must not exceed
                                                                                       10,000 grams HAP per
                                                                                       megagram (20 pounds per
                                                                                       ton) of total coatings
                                                                                       used.

[[Page 45590]]

 
New or reconstructed puncture        All organic HAP (measured as volatile organic    Reduce spray booth
 sealant application booth--Option    compounds (VOC)).                                emissions by at least 95
 1.                                                                                    percent.
Existing puncture sealant            All organic HAP (measured as VOC)..............  Reduce spray booth
 application booth--Option 1.                                                          emissions by at least 86
                                                                                       percent.
Existing, new or reconstructed       Selected organic HAP (See Table 16 of final      Emissions must not exceed
 puncture sealant application booth-  rule).                                           1,000 grams HAP per
 -Option 2.                                                                            megagram (2 pounds per
                                                                                       ton) of total puncture
                                                                                       sealants used.
                                     All other organic HAP..........................  Emissions must not exceed
                                                                                       10,000 grams HAP per
                                                                                       megagram (20 pounds per
                                                                                       ton) of total puncture
                                                                                       sealants used.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Emission limits are expressed as monthly average emission limits except for: (1) Tire production affected
  sources that comply by demonstrating that the cements and solvents that they use comply with the emission
  limit for every purchase; and (2) puncture sealant application affected sources that comply by meeting the
  overall control efficiency option which requires such sources to meet the emission reduction limit on a 3-hour
  average.

    The final rule also establishes operating limits for puncture 
sealant application affected sources that are complying with the 
overall control efficiency standards (i.e., 86 percent emission 
reduction or 95 percent emission reduction). The operating limits are 
established on a source-specific basis. Once established, sources must 
maintain specified control device and capture system operating 
parameter(s) within the range(s) established during the performance 
test and according to the source's monitoring plan.
    The final rule requires demonstrations of initial and ongoing 
compliance with the emission limitations. The specific requirements 
vary according to the affected source and the compliance alternative 
selected by that source. The final rule also establishes compliance 
dates, as well as provisions for performance testing, monitoring, 
recordkeeping, and reporting.

III. Significant Comments and Changes Since Proposal

    This section includes discussion of significant comments on the 
proposed rule, particularly where we have made changes for the final 
rule to address those comments. For a complete summary of all the 
comments received on the proposed rule and our responses to them, refer 
to the ``Technical Document for Promulgation of Standards, National 
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire 
Manufacturing, Comment and Response Summary'' (hereafter called the 
``response to comments document'') in docket A-97-14. The docket also 
contains the actual comment letters and supporting documentation 
developed for the final rule.

A. What Sources Are Subject to the Rule?

    We received several comments raising questions on the applicability 
of the rule to specific sources at rubber tire manufacturing 
facilities. We have clarified the applicability provisions in the final 
rule. This section describes in more detail how the rule applies to 
various operations at rubber tire manufacturing facilities.
1. Tire Bladders
    The final rule applies to manufacturers of rubber tires and 
components integral to rubber tires, as well as tire cord producers and 
puncture sealant operations. One commenter suggested that EPA clarify 
that tire bladders used in the manufacturing process are not 
``components integral to rubber tires.'' We agree that tire bladders 
are not integral components in a tire because they are used in an 
intermediate production process and are not found in the final product. 
Their manufacture does not involve the use of cements or solvents. 
Therefore, the final rule reflects this exclusion in Sec. 63.5981.
2. Tire Retread Operations
    Based on public comments, we reconsidered whether to include tire 
retread manufacturing operations in the source category definition. At 
the time of proposal, no major tire retread manufacturing sources were 
identified that would be subject to the rubber tire manufacturing rule. 
However, to the extent that these facilities use cements and solvents 
in producing retread tires, and they are a major source (standing alone 
or due to collocation), they would have been subject to the proposed 
version of the rule because of similarities in the solvents, cements, 
and adhesives used and the process used to build tires. In evaluating 
comments on this topic, we reconsidered information regarding the 
potential for HAP emissions from retreading operations, the 
applicability of the proposed rule, and the appropriateness of the tire 
production MACT floor for retreading operations.
    In both ``new'' tire production and retread tire production, tire 
building stations are used to create the pre-cured or pre-vulcanized 
tire. Several tire components can be combined for a virgin tire versus 
only two to three components for a retread tire. In the latter case, 
the carcass has been constructed eliminating those component steps in 
tire building for the retreader. The vulcanizing and curing of both the 
retread and the ``green'' tire are identical in their use of tire 
molds, the time for curing, the temperatures, and the pressures. These 
parameters are set in order to meet the tire safety and longevity 
specifications of the industry.
    The HAP emissions associated with sidewall cementing, tread end 
cementing, tire building and retread tire building all use similar 
cement and solvent formulations. Specifically, the main component of 
the cements and solvents used by both new and retread manufacturers are 
hexane and toluene. The primary purpose of these cements and solvents 
is as a temporary aid to ensure that the rubber compound surface 
remains ``tacky'' during tire building. However, several tire 
manufacturers and retreaders have reformulated or eliminated the use of 
these toxic compounds in their operations, while presumably still 
achieving the desired performance characteristics.
    Our review and evaluation of the tire building methods, tire 
building machinery, solvent and cement usage and application, and 
vulcanizing and curing processes for both new and retread tire 
operations has not indicated

[[Page 45591]]

significant differences in production techniques or in the types of 
tires being made. Our original conclusion to include retreading in the 
tire production subcategory, therefore, has not changed under this 
subsequent analysis.
    Evaluation of the tire production MACT floor database identified 
retreading operations at sources that also manufactured new tires. The 
HAP emissions associated with these facilities were minor in comparison 
to the overall facility emissions, and compliance with the MACT 
standards is anticipated using the facility-wide standards that have 
been established for the industry. Therefore, emissions associated with 
the retreading operations at facilities included in the Rubber 
Manufacturers Association's (RMA's) database are included in the 
overall emissions reported from the RMA and the individual companies.
    In addition, EPA examined the 1996 National Toxics Inventory (NTI) 
data, which revealed only three potential stand-alone major source 
facilities for retreading in the U.S. The primary pollutants reported 
were hexane and toluene. The 1996 NTI reported that HAP emissions from 
these sources ranged from 8 to 16 tons per year. Subsequent contacts 
with the permitting agencies for these sources revealed that the 
facilities have significantly reduced or eliminated HAP emissions. This 
analysis demonstrates the ability of retread facilities to 
substantially reduce or eliminate their HAP emissions.
    In conclusion, we believe that tread is an integral component of 
tires, and retread manufacturers should be subject to the emission 
standards for tire producers to the extent that they use cements and 
solvents.
3. Fabric Coating Operations
    The final rule clarifies the potential overlapping applicability of 
MACT standards for tire manufacturers who own and operate cord-treating 
facilities that produce tire cord as well as other fabric products, 
such as belts and hoses. For example, currently we are developing the 
fabric printing, coating, and dyeing NESHAP, which will potentially 
address the same cord coating operations as today's rubber tire 
manufacturing rule. In order to minimize potentially redundant 
requirements at these types of facilities, we have included in the 
final rule an exemption for coating activities where the primary 
product is a Web substrate other than tire cord, and the activities are 
regulated by another NESHAP. In other words, where tire cord is the 
primary product, the rubber tire manufacturing NESHAP would apply. 
Where it is not, the other NESHAP would apply. Any facility with 
potential overlapping applicability would have to determine which 
NESHAP apply to the facility by the compliance date of the first 
applicable NESHAP.
4. Research and Development Operations
    We have also determined that research and development (R&D) 
operations should not be subject to the rubber tire manufacturing rule. 
At proposal, we included them in the definition of HAP emission 
sources. However, we now believe that excluding them is more consistent 
with our statements in an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking in 
which we suggested that R&D operations should be listed as a separate 
source category (62 FR 25877) because including R&D operations in a 
rule governing manufacturing operations would be problematic. We are 
not aware of any stand-alone major R&D facilities. In fact, R&D is 
focused on development of rubber compounds, which should involve 
minimal solvent use. For these reasons and because R&D operations were 
not necessarily addressed in the MACT floor determination, the final 
rule exempts R&D facilities as defined in section 112(c)(7) of the CAA. 
An R&D facility is one ``whose primary purpose is to conduct research 
and development into new processes and products, where such source is 
operated under the close supervision of technically trained personnel 
and is not engaged in the manufacture of products for commercial sale 
in commerce, except in a de minimis manner.'' See CAA section 
112(c)(7).

B. How Did We Determine MACT?

1. Rubber Processing MACT
    Commenters said we did not provide data to support our conclusion 
that add-on control devices for rubber processing emissions are 
feasible but unreasonably expensive. According to the commenters, we 
should have considered the use of high-volume low-concentration (HVLC) 
technologies, which are available, proven, and cost-effective.
    At proposal, we considered beyond-the-floor control options in 
establishing MACT for the rubber processing source category based on 
regenerative incineration. We concluded that the costs of these 
controls, more than $200,000 per ton of HAP controlled, were too high 
to require them as the basis of the standard. However, in considering 
public comments on the proposed rule, we reviewed information provided 
by a commenter to further evaluate the applicability of a specific HVLC 
technology to rubber processing operations. The technology is a hybrid 
system that incorporates a rotary concentrator with conventional 
oxidation (emission reduction) technology. The concentrator provides a 
mechanism to concentrate low organic concentration gas streams in order 
to make destruction or removal, for example, with a following oxidizer, 
a more cost-effective control technique.
    As described in the response to comments document, our analysis 
showed that using the HVLC technology at a model facility would cost 
approximately $40,000 dollars per ton of emission reduction. While this 
is an improvement relative to the original cost impact, it is still too 
high to be considered a beyond-the-floor technology for existing and 
new facilities. Therefore, we have not revised the original MACT 
determination for this subcategory.
2. Tire Production MACT
    Several commenters said the two emission limit options proposed for 
the tire production subcategory are not equivalent, because Option 2 
(production-based option) is more stringent than Option 1 (HAP-
constituent option). They said these options should be equivalent 
because, otherwise, Option 2 represents a beyond-the-floor requirement. 
At a minimum, they thought that Option 2 should be based on the average 
emissions of the five best-performing sources.
    We disagree with these comments. As described in the proposal 
preamble, Option 1 represents the MACT floor and MACT. We developed 
Option 2 to represent a second form of the emission limit expressed in 
mass of HAP emitted per mass of rubber processed. Option 2 must be at 
least as stringent as Option 1, but is not required to be equivalent. 
Because the use of Option 2 is not required, it is not a beyond-the-
floor requirement. Instead, it provides sources flexibility in how they 
meet the emission limit.
    Commenters also said the proposal failed to set an emission limit 
with a meaningful control technology option, because the allowable 
emission levels in Options 1 and 2 effectively rule out control devices 
as a significant compliance option due to achievable capture efficiency 
rates in the tire production industry. This is important, commenters 
said, because reformulation is not an option in all cases due to the 
need for extensive equipment modification, modernization, and

[[Page 45592]]

facility reconfiguration as well as the high costs associated with such 
changes (likely exceeding $50 to $100 million per plant according to 
commenters).
    A central fact in our response to these issues is that Option 1 is 
based on the MACT floor determination for tire production affected 
sources. Based on data provided by the RMA, we determined that 
emissions from these sources are controlled primarily through pollution 
prevention measures such as reformulation or other changes in process 
operations, which reduce or eliminate HAP. In fact, of the 41 reported 
existing tire production facilities, 11 reported no potential for HAP 
emissions from cement or solvent use above the Superfund Amendments and 
Reauthorization Act (SARA) de minimis reporting threshold limitations 
for HAP-containing compounds. No additional information in support of 
subcategorizing the source category was provided by the industry. 
Because we did not identify any basis for further subcategorizing tire 
production sources, this level of performance represents MACT for all 
tire production affected sources.
    Despite a MACT floor determination based on pollution prevention, 
the proposed emission limits were crafted to allow the use of add-on 
control technologies as a compliance option because we recognized that 
some existing facilities currently use them to control a portion of 
their emissions. We also wanted to allow all sources the flexibility to 
use add-on controls, as long as the MACT floor requirements were met, 
if they found them more attractive than pollution prevention measures 
in reducing emissions from certain operations. We believe the result is 
a meaningful control technology option. While most facilities would 
have to achieve some increased level of pollution prevention to comply 
with the final rule, they would have the option to use add-on controls 
on any of the emission sources at the facility to provide additional 
needed reductions. Assuming sources used add-on controls on all of the 
available emission sources, the additional pollution prevention 
reductions to meet the emission limits would range from 0 to 54 
percent, with 27 percent as the average reduction. Given the tremendous 
strides in pollution prevention already achieved by the industry, we 
believe the NESHAP limits are achievable and that the control 
technology option is viable.
3. Puncture Sealant MACT
    Commenters said we overreached in establishing a standard for new 
sources that is more stringent than the standard for existing sources. 
The new source standard is on a single facility, which is operating a 
carbon absorber with a removal efficiency of 86 percent. According to 
commenters, we failed to conduct a beyond-the-floor analysis that 
includes the cost and technical feasibility to support our 
determination.
    We determined the new source MACT floor by looking at similar 
sources in other industries and found that their carbon absorbers are 
achieving better performance than that at the one existing puncture 
sealant source. Industries that emit VOC have extensive experience in 
using pollution control technologies to control the gaseous pollutants. 
Carbon adsorption can typically achieve greater than 90 percent 
efficiencies with inlet gaseous pollutant concentrations greater than a 
few hundred parts per million by volume (ppmv). At concentrations 
greater than 1000 ppmv, efficiencies can exceed 95 percent. The 
existing puncture sealant facility shows an inlet stream concentration 
of at least 1,400 ppmv. Use of combustion technologies, even at low 
pollutant concentrations (less than 100 ppmv), can generally achieve 90 
to 95 percent destruction efficiency. At higher concentrations, 
destruction efficiencies of 95 to 98 percent are achieved. Therefore, 
we believe that control devices at new facilities should be able to 
should be able to achieve at least 95 percent efficiency.
    Because commenters raised cost concerns, we compared the cost of 
installing an 86-percent efficient control device to the cost of a 95-
percent efficient control device at a new facility. Because the driving 
factor in the cost analysis is the airflow rate of the inlet stream, it 
actually costs less to install a 95-percent efficient carbon adsorber 
than an 86-percent efficient one. This is because both units would have 
the same total annual cost in the absence of recovery credits, but the 
more efficient device would achieve greater product recovery, which 
reduces the annual operating cost. Therefore, even if the standard for 
new sources were considered a beyond-the-floor standard, the MACT 
determination would be the same.

C. Can EPA Provide a Universal Certification Compliance Alternative?

    Commenters asked us to develop an alternative standard (and 
associated compliance procedures) for tire cord production and/or 
puncture sealant operations that would be analogous to the ``HAP 
constituent option'' (Option 1) for tire production sources. They said 
we should allow tire cord and puncture sealant facilities to certify 
annually that formulations used in such operations contain less than 
0.1 percent of those HAP specified in Table 16 of the proposed rule and 
less than 1 percent of all other HAP, and that this change would 
encourage pollution prevention.
    We agree that providing a similar HAP-constituent option for tire 
cord producers and puncture sealant operations would encourage 
pollution prevention. Demonstrating compliance with a HAP-constituent 
option would require additional emission reductions beyond those 
required by the MACT, but since its use would be optional, it would not 
constitute a beyond-the-floor requirement. However, we believe that its 
use should be limited to a monthly compliance alternative, reserving 
the annual alternative to the purchase of cements and solvents. Most, 
if not all, tire cord manufacturers and puncture sealant application 
facilities mix their coatings and puncture sealants on-site, which 
would require the use of the monthly compliance demonstration. We have 
written the final rule to add these compliance options.

D. What Role Should EPA Method 311 Play in Compliance Determinations?

    Commenters requested several clarifications regarding the role that 
EPA Method 311 (found in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 63) (Analysis of 
Hazardous Air Pollutant Compounds in Paints and Coatings by Direct 
Injection Into a Gas Chromatograph) should play in ongoing compliance 
determinations. For example, is an individual Method 311 test required 
to verify the HAP content for every batch of solvent or cement? Must 
the compliance demonstration determine the precise HAP content of the 
tested material, or can the de minimis reporting threshold discussed in 
the proposed rule (0.1 percent for certain listed HAP and 1.0 percent 
for other HAP) suffice? Can the tire manufacturing facility owner or 
operator rely on information provided by suppliers regarding the HAP 
content of materials? Can formulation data (material safety data sheets 
(MSDS) and certificates of compliance) be used in lieu of Method 311 
testing? Commenters stated that use of the MSDS and other data to 
screen products for HAP content will eliminate testing of hundreds of 
non-HAP containing materials.
    We reviewed the use of Method 311 in other recent coating standards 
we have proposed or promulgated. In order to be consistent with these 
standards and minimize the need for individual facilities to apply for 
approval of alternative methods, we have added flexibility to the 
process of certifying HAP contents of materials used in the

[[Page 45593]]

tire manufacturing industry. However, the reference test method for 
measuring the HAP content of tire manufacturing cements, solvents, 
coatings, and puncture sealants will be EPA Method 311. This is an 
established method that is appropriate for measuring the types of HAP 
used in these materials.
    The final rule, therefore, does not require a Method 311 test for 
HAP content, nor does it require you to test every shipment of 
materials you receive. You will be responsible for verifying, by any 
reasonable means such as periodic testing or manufacturer's 
certification, the HAP content (at least above the de minimis 
thresholds) of materials used at the facility. We may require you to 
conduct a test at any time using EPA Method 311 (or any approved 
alternative method) to confirm the HAP content reported in the 
compliance reports. If there is any inconsistency between the results 
of the EPA Method 311 test and any other means of determining HAP 
content, the Method 311 results will govern.

E. How Should the Tire Cord Compliance Requirements Address Potential 
Mixing Reactions?

    Commenters raised the issue of how to treat emissions from tire 
cord mixing operations in compliance determinations when reactions 
during mixing may affect emissions. For example, at what point in the 
mixing process should Method 311 samples (or other analytical means) be 
taken? If the analysis is based on the coating after it is mixed, 
reacted, and aged, the results will not account for the HAP emitted 
from or converted by the mixing process. However, if the analysis is 
based on coating collected from the mix tank after the addition of all 
the chemicals, but prior to subsequent processing, the analysis could 
overestimate the overall HAP emissions from the affected source. This 
is because tire cord coatings (``dip formulations'') commonly react 
during the mixing and storage operations. During these reactions, a HAP 
such as formaldehyde cross-links the polymers contained in the dip 
formulation. After this cross-linking reaction occurs, the chemical is 
unavailable to be released as an air emission during subsequent 
processing steps. For formaldehyde, the chemical conversion rate 
typically equals or exceeds 99 percent.
    At proposal, we assumed that the amount of HAP used in the tire 
cord production process would equal the amount of HAP emitted. We 
assumed you would document your material balances using records of the 
HAP contents of raw materials delivered to the mixing process. 
Alternatively, you could sample the coating mixture to verify HAP 
content. However, based on comments, it appears that the issue of 
reactive coatings is significant for tire cord production. We are 
concerned, however, that the commenters' solution to only address post-
mixing HAP would ignore potential fugitive emission losses from mixers.
    In the final rule, we have assumed that you will base your material 
balance on the assumption that 100 percent of the HAP added to a 
coating mixture is emitted. However, you will be allowed to account for 
HAP ``losses'' resulting from chemical reactions, e.g., curing or post-
application reactions. You can calculate these losses based on the 
conversion rates of the individual coating formulations, chemistry 
demonstrations, or other demonstrations that are verifiable to the 
approving agency. You may than use the revised value in your compliance 
demonstration. We have written the final rule to add these provisions.

F. What Data Requirements Should Sources Using Continuous Parameter 
Monitoring Systems Meet?

1. Deviations
    Commenters noted that proposed Sec. 63.5990, which requires 
facilities to be in compliance with the MACT standards at all times 
regardless of whether a source is using control equipment to comply, 
fails to recognize that several factors make it almost inevitable that 
the source's emissions will exceed the standards at times. Instead, 
sources should be given a chance to quickly correct a deviation from 
their operating parameter limits before a violation is registered. This 
encourages quick action and is appropriate because emissions may be 
underneath the regulatory limit even though the parameter limit is 
exceeded.
    The monitoring provisions in the final rule are structured to 
require a source to establish an individual operating limit (or 
operating parameter value) based on a site-specific performance test. 
Once established, the source should have the ability to operate as far 
as desired and/or necessary on the compliance side of the operating 
parameter.
    The length of the averaging time for the associated emission limit 
is another variable that affects the likelihood of deviations. For 
example, cases in which the monitoring data are used to demonstrate 
instantaneous compliance are more likely to create the exceedances 
suggested by the commenters. This is not the case in the final rule. 
Puncture sealant affected sources meeting the overall control 
efficiency compliance option are subject to operating limits based on a 
3-hour averaging period. Tire producers, tire cord producers, and 
puncture sealant applicators choosing to comply with one of the monthly 
average compliance options have a month in which to ensure that 
deviations from control device monitoring parameters do not affect 
their overall compliance status. In summary, we believe the final rule 
is based on parameters and averaging times that allow a conscientious 
operator to remain in compliance with the standards. Therefore, we have 
not made the changes suggested by commenters.
2. Startups, Shutdowns, and Malfunctions
    Commenters were concerned that Table 17 to proposed subpart XXXX 
indicates that the 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, General Provisions 
requirements regarding startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions 
(Secs. 63.6(e)(3) and (f)(1)) do not apply to sources that choose to 
use control devices to comply with the standards. One commenter cited 
precedents regarding the need for ``achievable'' standards and argued 
that the final rule should be written to indicate that these sections 
do apply to facilities complying through the use of control devices.
    We agree that puncture sealant affected sources that are subject to 
operating limits should be allowed to use the startup, shutdown, and 
malfunction provisions, and have corrected this oversight for the final 
rule. We separately considered whether to extend these provisions to 
tire production, tire cord production, and puncture sealant affected 
sources complying with the monthly average compliance options because 
compliance with the monitored parameter is only a trigger that 
determines whether the source can use the established emission 
reductions of the capture and control system in the compliance 
demonstration. Because the overall compliance demonstration is based on 
a month's worth of data, we considered whether the startup, shutdown, 
and malfunction provisions were needed to ensure an achievable 
standard. We determined that for sources relying heavily on the use of 
control equipment to meet the overall emission limit, the inability to 
exclude periods of startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions from the 
compliance demonstration could increase their risk of failing to comply 
with the emission limit. Therefore, we have written the final rule to 
add the startup, shutdown, and malfunction

[[Page 45594]]

provisions for sources complying with the standards through control 
devices.
3. Minimum Data Collection Requirements
    Commenters said the proposal fails to allow for the loss of even 
minimal amounts of test or monitoring data when sources are complying 
by using add-on control devices. They suggested adding provisions 
similar to those found in the municipal waste combuster MACT standards 
issued under section 129 of the CAA.
    We have therefore written the final rule to provide information on 
these minimum data requirements. We agree that the proposed rule, by 
being silent on minimum data requirements, could have caused confusion 
for compliance demonstrations. The tradeoff to consider in adding these 
requirements is that the monitoring system should be optimized to limit 
occurrences when data collection is jeopardized because of system 
faults and failures. Therefore, we have clarified in the final rule the 
establishment of reasonable minimum data collection requirements, 
implemented through the use of a site-specific monitoring plan designed 
to optimize system performance.
    The final rule requires you, for each operating parameter you 
monitor, to install, operate, and maintain each continuous parameter 
monitoring system (CPMS) according to the following requirements:
     Operate CPMS at all times the process is operating;
     Collect data from at least four equally spaced periods 
each hour;
     For at least 75 percent of the hours in an operating day, 
have valid data (as defined in the site-specific monitoring plan) for 
at least four equally spaced periods each hour;
     For each hour of valid data from at least four equally 
spaced periods, calculate the hourly average value using all valid 
data;
     Calculate the daily average using all of the hourly 
averages; and
     Record the results for each inspection, calibration, and 
validation check as specified in the site-specific monitoring plan.
    For each monitoring system required, you must develop and submit 
for approval a site-specific monitoring plan that addresses the 
following requirements:
     Installation of the continuous monitoring system (CMS) 
sampling probe or other interface at a measurement location relative to 
each affected process unit such that the measurement is representative 
of control of the exhaust emissions (e.g., on or downstream of the last 
control device);
     Performance and equipment specifications for the sample 
interface, the pollutant concentration or parametric signal analyzer, 
and the data collection and reduction system; and
     Performance evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria 
(e.g., calibrations).
    The plan must also address the following ongoing procedures:
     Ongoing operation and maintenance procedures in accordance 
with the general requirements of 40 CFR 63.8(c)(1), (3), (4)(ii), (7), 
and (8), and 63.5990;
     Ongoing data quality assurance procedures in accordance 
with the general requirements of 40 CFR 63.8(d); and
     Ongoing recordkeeping and reporting procedures in 
accordance the general requirements of 40 CFR 63.10(c) and (e)(1) and 
(2)(i).

G. Is Compliance Based on Daily Recordkeeping Needed?

    Commenters recommended specifying that monthly average compliance 
demonstrations should be based on monthly inventory and usage records, 
instead of daily ones, for several reasons:
     The proposal to require daily records of many parameters 
(control devices are the exception) is inconsistent with the 
requirement for a monthly average, is very burdensome, and would not 
serve any environmental purpose.
     Use of monthly data would eliminate the need for proposed 
equation 3 of Sec. 63.5997(b)(3) of proposed subpart XXXX.
     Monthly records are consistent with other MACT standards, 
and it would be arbitrary and capricious to single out the tire 
manufacturing standards for daily recordkeeping when it is unnecessary 
to show compliance with a monthly averaging period, and other similar 
standards require only monthly recordkeeping.
     Monitoring the flow of cements and solvents through the 
plant's central dispensing area on a monthly basis is less burdensome 
than on a daily basis.
     The accuracy of a monthly system is significantly better 
than individual measurements of hundreds of containers on a daily 
basis.
    We believe the commenters have overstated the need for complex 
recordkeeping systems to implement the rule as proposed. For example, 
we believe sources could monitor daily flow of cements and solvents 
through one or two central locations instead of at the point of use. 
However, upon consideration, we agree that a monthly system of cement, 
solvent, and coating use is sufficient to demonstrate compliance with 
the emission limitations. Therefore, we have written the final rule to 
implement a monthly system. This change simplifies the compliance 
equations and should reduce recordkeeping burden without compromising 
compliance assurance.

H. Has EPA Properly Considered the Cost Impacts of the Rule?

    Commenters felt we underestimated the cost impacts of the proposed 
rule by failing to incorporate significant costs associated with 
creating systems to track daily material usage. They suggested that 
monthly recordkeeping would be more economical, could be more easily 
maintained, and would still demonstrate compliance with the standards.
    We believe that the commenters misinterpreted the proposed 
recordkeeping requirements to require tracking cement, solvent, and 
coating use at every single step in the process. Instead, we believe 
facilities should be able to monitor a limited number of central 
locations (e.g., amount of coating leaving mix area, amount of solvent 
distributed from storage), and thereby avoid significant costs. 
However, as described above, we have determined that monthly 
recordkeeping will be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the 
emission limitations and have written the final rule to allow it.
    Commenters also were concerned that we presented the proposed rule 
as a nonsignificant regulatory action, when it may force technology 
developments that are not incorporated into the analysis presented. 
Commenters said reformulation is not an option in every case, and the 
lack of a meaningful control technology option will force significant 
technology upgrades to comply with the standards. According to one 
commenter, this type of modernization costs $50 to $100 million per 
plant, and these types of costs are not reflected in the impacts 
analysis of the proposed rule.
    As earlier described, we believe the rule contains a viable 
emission control technology option. In addition to the cost estimate 
prepared for the final rule, we also conducted a theoretical cost 
analysis using more conservative (i.e., high-end) assumptions regarding 
the level of reformulation and the probable capture efficiencies. That 
analysis maximized the number of sources installing add-on control 
devices, reduced add-on control capture efficiencies, and determined 
solvent

[[Page 45595]]

reformulation costs on a facility-specific basis. (See the response to 
comments document for more details.) Based on these assumptions, total 
annual control costs to all tire producers combined could be as high as 
$35 million. Even considering impacts based on these more conservative 
(higher end of range) assumptions, the final rule will not trigger the 
$100 million criterion used by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB), let alone approach the estimate provided by one commenter of $50 
to $100 million per plant to meet the emission limits.

I. What Other Changes Has EPA Made for the Final Rule?

    We have made several other changes for the final rule. These 
changes include the following:
     Changes to the compliance equations to clarify them, 
address the addition of new compliance options, make them consistent 
with monthly recordkeeping, and fix errors.
     Revisions or additions to clarify applicability in 
definitions (cements and solvents, fabric processed, tire cord, etc.).
     Other minor changes to correct editorial and minor 
technical errors in the proposal package.

J. What Are the Environmental, Cost, and Economic Impacts of the Final 
Rule?

    The final rule will eliminate approximately 983 megagrams per year 
(Mg/yr) (1,084 tons/yr) (52 percent) of the baseline annual HAP 
emissions from this industry. For the tire production source 
subcategory, we estimate that the final rule will reduce HAP emissions 
by approximately 949 Mg/yr (1,047 tons/yr). For the tire cord 
production source subcategory, we estimate that the final rule will 
reduce HAP emissions by approximately 34 Mg/yr (37 tons/yr). We also 
estimate that the final rule will reduce emissions of VOC by the same 
amount.
    For the one existing puncture sealant application affected source, 
we are not requiring different emissions control than what is currently 
done. Therefore, the final rule will not reduce HAP or other emissions 
from baseline emissions levels at this facility.
    The final rule encourages the adoption of pollution prevention 
measures. As a result, we believe that most manufacturers will adopt 
these measures and expect minimal, if any, increases in energy 
consumption, and minimal reductions in water pollution and solid waste.
    Actual compliance costs will depend on each source's existing 
cement, solvent, and coating formulations and control equipment, and 
the modifications made to comply with the final rule. Table 2 shows the 
total annual costs for affected sources to comply with the final rule. 
These costs include the estimated costs of reformulating cements, 
solvents, and coatings or installation of add-on control devices, as 
well as monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping costs.

  Table 2.--Total Annual Costs of the Rubber Tire Manufacturing Rule for Tire Production, Tire Cord Production,
                                        and Puncture Sealant Application
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Tire production/
                                                                  puncture
                        Annual costs                              sealant          Tire cord
                                                               application a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control.....................................................      $21,359,000       $2,477,000
Monitoring..................................................        1,161,000          193,000
Recordkeeping and reporting average.........................          597,000          105,000
      Total nationwide costs................................       23,117,000        2,775,000     =$25,892,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Puncture sealant monitoring and reporting recordkeeping costs are included in the tire production costs.

    The economic impact analysis (EIA) provides an estimate of the 
anticipated regulatory impacts of the rule for rubber tire 
manufacturing. The information collected for this rule from rubber tire 
manufacturers indicates that there are 14 companies potentially 
affected by the rule. States with the largest concentration of 
facilities are Alabama, Illinois, North Carolina, South Carolina, and 
Ohio. None of the facilities manufacturing rubber tires are owned by 
companies that are classified as small businesses.
    In general, the economic impacts of the rule are expected to be 
minimal. A market price increase of less than 1 percent, or $0.03 per 
tire, is projected. Domestic producer pre-tax earnings are projected to 
decrease by $14 million, or 1.2 percent. The EIA estimates that 
domestic tire output will decline by 154,000 tires (0.05 percent), 
while imports will increase by 24,000 tires (0.05 percent), resulting 
in a net decline of 130,000 tires, or 0.04 percent.
    The value of a regulatory action is traditionally measured by the 
change in economic welfare that it generates. The final rule's welfare 
impacts, or the social costs required to achieve environmental 
improvements, will extend to tire consumers and producers alike. The 
social costs for existing sources are projected to be approximately $24 
million.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
and therefore subject to OMB review and the requirements of the 
Executive Order. The Executive Order defines ``significant regulatory 
action'' as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligation of recipients 
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
the Executive Order.
    It has been determined that this rule is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is 
therefore not subject to OMB review.

B. Executive Order 13045--Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from Environmental 
Health

[[Page 45596]]

Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any 
rule that (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' as 
defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental 
health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a 
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets 
both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or 
safety effects of the planned rule on children and explain why the 
planned rule is preferable to other potentially effective and 
reasonably feasible alternatives that we considered.
    This final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it 
is not an economically significant regulatory action as defined by 
Executive Order 12866. In addition, EPA interprets Executive Order 
13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that are based on 
health and safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 
5-501 of the Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This 
final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is based 
on technology performance and not on health or safety risks.

C. Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination 
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000), 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal 
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal government and the Indian tribes, 
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the 
Federal government and Indian tribes.''
    This final rule does not have tribal implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship 
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. 
This is because no tribal governments own or operate a rubber tire 
manufacturing facility. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to 
this rule.

D. Executive Order 13132--Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have federalism implications'' are defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of Government.''
    This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not 
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of Government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132. The standards apply only to 
rubber tire manufacturers and do not pre-exempt States from adopting 
more stringent standards or otherwise regulate State or local 
governments. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this final 
rule.
    Although section 6 of Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this 
final rule, EPA did consult with State and local officials in 
developing this final rule. No concerns were raised by these officials 
during this consultation.

E. Executive Order 13211--Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a 
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal 
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, we 
generally must prepare a written statement, including cost-benefit 
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that 
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 
1 year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement 
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires us to identify 
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt 
the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative 
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover, 
section 205 allows us to adopt an alternative with other than the least 
costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative if we 
publish with the final rule an explanation why that alternative was not 
adopted.
    Before we establish any regulatory requirements that may 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, including tribal 
governments, we must have developed under section 203 of the UMRA a 
small government agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying 
potentially affected small governments, enabling officials of affected 
small governments to have meaningful and timely input in the 
development of our regulatory proposals with significant Federal 
intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and advising 
small governments on compliance with the regulatory requirements.
    We have determined that this final rule does not contain a Federal 
mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for 
State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private 
sector in any 1 year. The maximum total annual cost of this rule for 
any year has been estimated to be less than $26 million. Thus, today's 
final rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 
of the UMRA. In addition, we have determined that this final rule 
contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments because it contains no regulatory 
requirements that apply to such governments or impose obligations upon 
them. Therefore, this final rule is not subject to the requirements of 
section 203 of the UMRA.

G. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.

    The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory 
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment 
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any 
other statute unless the Agency certifies that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Small entities include small businesses,

[[Page 45597]]

small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's final rule on 
small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business 
according to the Small Business Administration (SBA) size standards by 
NAICS code (which ranges from 500 to 1,000 employees for the rubber 
tire manufacturing industry); (2) a small governmental jurisdiction 
that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or 
special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small 
organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is 
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impacts of today's final rule on 
small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final 
rule will not impose any requirements on small entities. We have 
determined that none of the 43 facilities expected to be subject to the 
final rule are small entities.

H. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The information collection requirements in this final rule have 
been submitted for approval to OMB under the requirements of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. An Information 
Collection Request (ICR) document has been prepared by EPA (ICR No. 
1982.01), and a copy may be obtained from Ms. Sandy Farmer by mail at 
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental 
Information, Collection Strategies Division (2822), 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001, by e-mail at 
[email protected], or by calling (202) 260-2740. A copy may also be 
downloaded off the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/icr. The information 
requirements are not effective until OMB approves them.
    The final information requirements are based on notifications, 
records, and reports required by the General Provisions (40 CFR part 
63, subpart A), which are mandatory for all operators subject to 
national emission standards. These recordkeeping and reporting 
requirements are specifically authorized under section 114 of the CAA 
(42 U.S.C. 7414). All information submitted to the EPA pursuant to the 
recordkeeping and reporting requirements for which a claim of 
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to Agency 
policies in 40 CFR part 2, subpart, Confidentiality of Business 
Information.
    The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this 
collection of information (averaged over the first 3 years after the 
effective date of the promulgated rule) is estimated to total 12,807 
labor hours per year at a total annual cost of $701,337. This estimate 
includes notifications, a performance test and report for sources using 
control devices to comply with the regulation, semiannual compliance 
reports, annual compliance certifications, records of cements and 
solvents composition, records of cements and solvents use, records of 
HAP use, and records of any required parameter monitoring.
    The total estimated annual and capital monitoring, inspection, 
reporting and recordkeeping (MIRR) costs for existing and new major 
sources to comply with the final standards when an affected source opts 
to comply via the use of add-on control equipment are determined based 
on the estimated capital costs of equipment required for MIRR 
activities. For the rubber tire manufacturing industry, the total 
estimated installed capital costs of this equipment is $2.9 million for 
existing major sources and $569,558 for new major sources. Annualized 
capital MIRR costs for existing and new major sources to comply with 
the final standards through the use of add-on controls were estimated 
to be $1.6 million and $220,386, respectively.
    The total annual estimated operating and maintenance costs (O&M) 
were calculated based on: (1) The estimated storage, filing, 
photocopying, and postage costs for the estimated total annual 
responses associated with the provisions of the rubber tire rule; and 
(2) the O&M costs for the equipment required for compliance with these 
standards. The total storage, filing, photocopying, and postage cost 
per response was $20.67, for an annual estimated average of $1,778.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources 
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or 
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time 
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize 
technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and 
verifying information; process and maintain information and disclose 
and provide information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any 
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to 
respond to a collection of information; search existing data sources; 
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or 
otherwise disclose the information.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's 
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. The OMB 
control number(s) for the information collection requirements in this 
rule will be listed in an amendment to 40 CFR part 9 or 48 CFR chapter 
15 in a subsequent Federal Register document after OMB approves the 
ICR.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) of 1995, Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) 15 U.S.C. 272 
note) directs us to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in our 
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards 
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, 
sampling procedures, business practices) developed or adopted by one or 
more voluntary consensus bodies. The NTTAA directs us to provide 
Congress, through annual reports to OMB, with explanations when we do 
not use available and applicable VCS.
    This rulemaking involves technical standards. We are citing the 
following methods in this rule: EPA Methods 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, 
2G, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 25, and 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A; EPA 
Methods 204 and 204A-F of 40 CFR part 51, appendix M; and EPA Method 
311 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A. Consistent with the NTTAA, we 
conducted searches to identify VCS in addition to these EPA methods. No 
applicable VCS were identified for EPA Methods 1A, 2A, 2D, 2F, 2G, 204, 
204A-F, and 311. The search and review results have been documented and 
are placed in the docket (A-97-14) for this rule.
    Five voluntary consensus standards: ASTM D1979-97, ASTM D3432-89, 
ASTM D4747-87, ASTM D4827-93, and ASTM PS 9-94 are already incorporated 
by reference in EPA Method 311.
    The search for emissions measurement procedures identified 14 other 
VCS. We determined that 11 of these 14 VCS identified for measuring 
emissions of HAP or surrogates subject to emission standards in this 
rule were impractical alternatives to EPA test methods for the purposes 
of this rule. Therefore, we do not intend to adopt these VCS. The 
reasons for the determinations of these 11 VCS are discussed below.
    The VCS ASTM D3154-91 ``Standard Method for Average Velocity in a 
Duct (Pitot Tube Method),'' is an impractical

[[Page 45598]]

alternative to EPA Methods 1, 2, 2C, 3, 3B, and 4 for the purposes of 
this rulemaking because it lacks in quality control and quality 
assurance requirements. Specifically, ASTM D3154-91 (1995) does not 
include the following: (1) Proof that openings of standard pitot tubes 
have not plugged during the test; (2) if differential pressure gauges 
other than inclined manometers (e.g., magnehelic gauges) are used, 
their calibration must be checked after each test series; and (3) the 
frequency and validity range for calibration of the temperature 
sensors.
    The VCS ISO 10780:1994, ``Stationary Source Emissions--Measurement 
of Velocity and Volume Flowrate of Gas Streams in Ducts,'' is 
impractical as an alternative to EPA Method 2 in this rulemaking. This 
standard, ISO 10780:1994, recommends the use of L-shaped pitots, which 
historically have not been recommended because the S-type design has 
large openings which are less likely to plug up with dust.
    The VCS ASTM D3464-96 (2001), ``Standard Test Method Average 
Velocity in a Duct Using a Thermal Anemometer,'' is impractical as an 
alternative to EPA Method 2 for the purposes of this rulemaking 
primarily because applicability specifications are not clearly defined, 
e.g., range of gas composition, temperature limits. Also, the lack of 
supporting quality assurance data for the calibration procedures and 
specifications, and certain variability issues that are not adequately 
addressed by the standard limit our ability to make a definitive 
comparison of the method in these areas.
    Two very similar standards, ASTM D5835-95, ``Standard Practice for 
Sampling Stationary Source Emissions for Automated Determination of Gas 
Concentration,'' and ISO 10396:1993, ``Stationary Source Emissions: 
Sampling for the Automated Determination of Gas Concentrations,'' are 
impractical alternatives to EPA Method 3A for the purposes of this 
rulemaking because they lack in detail and quality assurance/quality 
control requirements. Specifically, these two standards do not include 
the following: (1) Sensitivity of the method; (2) acceptable levels of 
analyzer calibration error; (3) acceptable levels of sampling system 
bias; (4) zero drift and calibration drift limits, time span, and 
required testing frequency; (5) a method to test the interference 
response of the analyzer; (6) procedures to determine the minimum 
sampling time per run and minimum measurement time; and (7) 
specifications for data recorders, in terms of resolution (all types) 
and recording intervals (digital and analog recorders, only).
    Two VCS, EN 12619:1999 ``Stationary Source Emissions-Determination 
of the Mass Concentration of Total Gaseous Organic Carbon at Low 
Concentrations in Flue Gases--Continuous Flame Ionization Detector 
Method'' and ISO 14965:2000(E) ``Air Quality-Determination of Total 
Nonmethane Organic Compounds-Cryogenic Preconcentration and Direct 
Flame Ionization Method,'' are impractical alternatives to EPA Method 
25A for the purposes of this rulemaking because the standards do not 
apply to solvent process vapors in concentrations greater than 40 ppm 
carbon for EN 12619 and 10 ppm carbon for ISO 14965. Methods whose 
upper limits are this low are too limited to be useful in measuring 
source emissions, which are expected to be much higher.
    Four VCS are impractical alternatives to EPA test methods for the 
purposes of this rulemaking because they are too general, too broad, or 
not sufficiently detailed to assure compliance with EPA regulatory 
requirements: ASTM D3796-90 (Reapproved 1996), ``Standard Practice for 
Calibration of Type S Pitot Tubes,'' for EPA Method 2; ASME C00031 or 
PTC 19-10-1981--Part 10, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,'' for EPA 
Method 3; CAN/CSA Z223.2-M86(1986), ``Method for the Continuous 
Measurement of Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Sulphur 
Dioxide, and Oxides of Nitrogen in Enclosed Combustion Flue Gas 
Streams,'' for EPA Method 3A; and ASTM E337-84 (Reapproved 1996), 
``Standard Test Method for Measuring Humidity with a Psychrometer (the 
Measurement of Wet- and Dry-Bulb Temperatures),'' for EPA Method 4.
    Three of the 14 VCS identified in this search were not available at 
the time the review was conducted for the purposes of this rulemaking 
because they are under development by a voluntary consensus body: ASME/
BSR MFC 13M, ``Flow Measurement by Velocity Traverse,'' for EPA Method 
2 (and possibly 1); ASME/BSR MFC 12M, ``Flow in Closed Conduits Using 
Multiport Averaging Pitot Primary Flowmeters,'' for EPA Method 2; and 
ISO/DIS 12039, ``Stationary Source Emissions--Determination of Carbon 
Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and Oxygen--Automated Methods,'' for EPA 
Method 3A.
    Sections 63.5993, 63.5994, 63.5997, and 63.6000 to subpart XXXX 
list the EPA testing methods in the final rule. Under 40 CFR 63.8 of 
subpart A of the General Provisions, a source may apply to obtain 
permission to use alternative monitoring in place of any of the EPA 
testing methods.

J. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not 
a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will be 
effective on July 9, 2002.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental 
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rubber tire 
manufacturing.

    Dated: May 15, 2002.
Christine Todd Whitman,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 
63 of the Code of the Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 63--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.


    2. Part 63 is amended by adding subpart XXXX to read as follows:

Subpart XXXX--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing

Sec.

What This Subpart Covers

63.5980   What is the purpose of this subpart?
63.5981   Am I subject to this subpart?
63.5982   What parts of my facility does this subpart cover?
63.5983   When do I have to comply with this subpart?

Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources

63.5984   What emission limits must I meet for tire production 
affected sources?
63.5985   What are my alternatives for meeting the emission limits 
for tire production affected sources?

[[Page 45599]]

Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected Sources

63.5986   What emission limits must I meet for tire cord production 
affected sources?
63.5987   What are my alternatives for meeting the emission limits 
for tire cord production affected sources?

Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant Application Affected Sources

63.5988   What emission limitations must I meet for puncture sealant 
application affected sources?
63.5989   What are my alternatives for meeting the emission 
limitations for puncture sealant application affected sources?

General Compliance Requirements

63.5990   What are my general requirements for complying with this 
subpart?

General Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements

63.5991   By what date must I conduct an initial compliance 
demonstration or performance test?
63.5992   When must I conduct subsequent performance tests?
63.5993   What performance tests and other procedures must I use?

Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Tire Production 
Affected Sources

63.5994   How do I conduct tests and procedures for tire production 
affected sources?
63.5995   What are my monitoring installation, operation, and 
maintenance requirements?
63.5996   How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission 
limits for tire production affected sources?

Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Tire Cord Production 
Affected Sources

63.5997   How do I conduct tests and procedures for tire cord 
production affected sources?
63.5998   What are my monitoring installation, operation, and 
maintenance requirements?
63.5999   How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission 
limits for tire cord production affected sources?

Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Puncture Sealant 
Application Affected Sources

63.6000   How do I conduct tests and procedures for puncture sealant 
application affected sources?
63.6001   What are my monitoring installation, operation, and 
maintenance requirements?
63.6002   How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission 
limits for puncture sealant application affected sources?

Continuous Compliance Requirements for Tire Production Affected Sources

63.6003   How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate 
continuous compliance with the emission limits for tire production 
affected sources?
63.6004   How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the 
emission limits for tire production affected sources?

Continuous Compliance Requirements for Tire Cord Production Affected 
Sources

63.6005   How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate 
continuous compliance with the emission limits for tire cord 
production affected sources?
63.6006   How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the 
emission limits for tire cord production affected sources?

Continuous Compliance Requirements for Puncture Sealant Application 
Affected Sources

63.6007  How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous 
compliance with the emission limitations for puncture sealant 
application affected sources?
63.6008   How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the 
emission limitations for puncture sealant application affected 
sources?

Notifications, Reports, and Records

63.6009   What notifications must I submit and when?
63.6010   What reports must I submit and when?
63.6011   What records must I keep?
63.6012   In what form and how long must I keep my records?

Other Requirements and Information

63.6013   What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?
63.6014   Who implements and enforces this subpart?
63.6015   What definitions apply to this subpart?

Tables to Subpart XXXX of Part 63

Table 1 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Emission Limits for Tire 
Production Affected Sources
Table 2 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Emission Limits for Tire Cord 
Production Affected Sources
Table 3 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Emission Limits for Puncture 
Sealant Application Affected Sources
Table 4 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Operating Limits for Puncture 
Sealant Application Control Devices
Table 5 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Requirements for Performance 
Tests
Table 6 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Initial Compliance with the 
Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources
Table 7 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Initial Compliance with the 
Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected Sources
Table 8 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Initial Compliance with the 
Emission Limits for Puncture Sealant Application Affected Sources
Table 9 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Minimum Data for Continuous 
Compliance with the Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected 
Sources
Table 10 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with the 
Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources
Table 11 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Minimum Data for Continuous 
Compliance with the Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production 
Affected Sources
Table 12 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with the 
Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected Sources
Table 13 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Minimum Data for Continuous 
Compliance with the Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant 
Application Affected Sources
Table 14 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Continuous Compliance with the 
Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant Application Affected 
Sources
Table 15 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Requirements for Reports
Table 16 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Selected Hazardous Air 
Pollutants
Table 17 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63--Applicability of General 
Provisions to This Subpart XXXX

Subpart XXXX--National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing

What This Subpart Covers


Sec. 63.5980  What is the purpose of this subpart?

    This subpart establishes national emission standards for hazardous 
air pollutants (NESHAP) for rubber tire manufacturing. This subpart 
also establishes requirements to demonstrate initial and continuous 
compliance with the emission limitations.


Sec. 63.5981  Am I subject to this subpart?

    (a) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a rubber 
tire manufacturing facility that is located at, or is a part of, a 
major source of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions.
    (1) Rubber tire manufacturing includes the production of rubber 
tires and/or the production of components integral to rubber tires, the 
production of tire cord, and the application of puncture sealant. 
Components of rubber tires include, but are not limited to, rubber 
compounds, sidewalls, tread, tire beads, tire cord and liners. Other 
components often associated with rubber tires but not integral to the 
tire, such as wheels, inner tubes, tire bladders, and valve stems, are 
not components of rubber tires or tire cord and are not subject to this 
subpart.
    (2) A major source of HAP emissions is any stationary source or 
group of stationary sources within a contiguous area and under common 
control that emits or has the potential to emit considering controls, 
in the aggregate, any single HAP at a rate of 9.07 megagrams (10 tons) 
or more per year or

[[Page 45600]]

any combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68 megagrams (25 tons) or more 
per year.
    (b) You are not subject to this subpart if the affected source at 
your rubber tire manufacturing facility meets either of the conditions 
described in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section.
    (1) You own or operate a tire cord production affected source, but 
the primary product produced at the affected source is determined to be 
subject to another subpart under this part 63 as of the effective date 
of that subpart (publication date of the final rule) or startup of the 
source, whichever is later. In this case, you must determine which 
subpart applies to your source and you must be in compliance with the 
applicable subpart by the compliance date of that subpart. The primary 
product is the product that is produced for the greatest operating time 
over a 5-year period, based on expected utilization for the 5 years 
following the compliance date or following initial startup of the 
source, whichever is later.
    (2) Your rubber tire manufacturing affected source is a research 
and development facility whose primary purpose is to conduct research 
and development into new processes and products, where such source is 
operated under the close supervision of technically trained personnel 
and is not engaged in the manufacture of products for commercial sale 
in commerce, except in a de minimis manner.


Sec. 63.5982  What parts of my facility does this subpart cover?

    (a) This subpart applies to each existing, new, or reconstructed 
affected source at facilities engaged in the manufacture of rubber 
tires or their components.
    (b) The affected sources are defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this 
section (tire production), paragraph (b)(2) of this section (tire cord 
production), paragraph (b)(3) of this section (puncture sealant 
application), and paragraph (b)(4) of this section (rubber processing).
    (1) The tire production affected source is the collection of all 
processes that use or process cements and solvents as defined in 
Sec. 63.6015, located at any rubber tire manufacturing facility. It 
includes, but is not limited to: Storage and mixing vessels and the 
transfer equipment containing cements and/or solvents; wastewater 
handling and treatment operations; tread and cement operations; tire 
painting operations; ink and finish operations; undertread cement 
operations; process equipment cleaning materials; bead cementing 
operations; tire building operations; green tire spray operations; 
extruding, to the extent cements and solvents are used; cement house 
operations; marking operations; calendar operations, to the extent 
solvents are used; tire striping operations; tire repair operations; 
slab dip operations; other tire building operations, to the extent that 
cements and solvents are used; and balance pad operations.
    (2) The tire cord production affected source is the collection of 
all processes engaged in the production of tire cord. It includes, but 
is not limited to: dipping operations, drying ovens, heat-set ovens, 
bulk storage tanks, mixing facilities, general facility vents, air 
pollution control devices, and warehouse storage vents.
    (3) The puncture sealant application affected source is the 
puncture sealant application booth operation used to apply puncture 
sealant to finished tires.
    (4) The rubber processing affected source is the collection of all 
rubber mixing processes (e.g., banburys and associated drop mills) that 
either mix compounds or warm rubber compound before the compound is 
processed into components of rubber tires. The mixed rubber compound 
itself is also included in the rubber processing affected source. There 
are no emission limitations or other requirements for the rubber 
processing affected source.
    (c) An affected source is a new affected source if construction of 
the affected source commenced after October 18, 2000, and it met the 
applicability criteria of Sec. 63.5981 at the time construction 
commenced.
    (d) An affected source is reconstructed if it meets the criteria as 
defined in Sec. 63.2.
    (e) An affected source is existing if it is not new or 
reconstructed.


Sec. 63.5983  When do I have to comply with this subpart?

    (a) If you have a new or reconstructed affected source, except as 
provided in Secs. 63.5982(b)(4) and 63.5981(b)(1), you must comply with 
the emission limitations for new and reconstructed sources in this 
subpart upon startup.
    (b) If you have an existing affected source, you must comply with 
the emission limitations for existing sources no later than July 11, 
2005.
    (c) If you have an area source that increases its emissions or its 
potential to emit such that it becomes a major source of HAP, the 
affected source(s) must be in compliance with existing source emission 
limitations no later than 3 years after the date on which the area 
source became a major source.
    (d) You must meet the notification requirements in Sec. 63.6009 
according to the schedule in Sec. 63.6009 and in subpart A of this 
part. Some of the notifications must be submitted before the date you 
are required to comply with the emission limitations in this subpart.

Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources


Sec. 63.5984  What emission limits must I meet for tire production 
affected sources?

    You must meet each emission limit in either option 1 or option 2 of 
Table 1 to this subpart that applies to you.


Sec. 63.5985  What are my alternatives for meeting the emission limits 
for tire production affected sources?

    You must use one of the compliance alternatives in paragraphs (a) 
through (c) of this section to meet either of the emission limits in 
Sec. 63.5984.
    (a) Purchase alternative. Use only cements and solvents that, as 
purchased, contain no more HAP than allowed by the emission limits in 
Table 1 to this subpart, option 1 (HAP constituent option).
    (b) Monthly average alternative, without using an add-on control 
device. Use cements and solvents in such a way that the monthly average 
HAP emissions do not exceed the emission limits in Table 1 to this 
subpart, option 1 or option 2.
    (c) Monthly average alternative, using an add-on control device. 
Use a control device to reduce HAP emissions so that the monthly 
average HAP emissions do not exceed the emission limits in Table 1 to 
this subpart, option 1 or option 2.

Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected Sources


Sec. 63.5986  What emission limits must I meet for tire cord production 
affected sources?

    You must meet each emission limit in either option 1 or option 2 of 
Table 2 to this subpart that applies to you.


Sec. 63.5987  What are my alternatives for meeting the emission limits 
for tire cord production affected sources?

    You must use one of the compliance alternatives in paragraph (a) or 
(b) of this section to meet the emission limits in Sec. 63.5986.
    (a) Monthly average alternative, without using an add-on control 
device. Use coatings in such a way that the monthly average HAP 
emissions do not exceed the emission limits in Table 2 to this subpart.
    (b) Monthly average alternative, using an add-on control device. 
Use a control device to reduce HAP emissions so that the monthly 
average HAP emissions do not exceed the emission limits in Table 2 to 
this subpart.

[[Page 45601]]

Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant Application Affected Sources


Sec. 63.5988  What emission limitations must I meet for puncture 
sealant application affected sources?

    (a) You must meet each emission limit in either option 1 or option 
2 of Table 3 to this subpart that applies to you.
    (b) If you use an add-on control device to meet the emission limits 
in Table 3 to this subpart, you must also meet each operating limit in 
Table 4 to this subpart that applies to you.


Sec. 63.5989  What are my alternatives for meeting the emission 
limitations for puncture sealant application affected sources?

    You must use one of the compliance alternatives in paragraphs (a) 
through (d) of this section to meet the emission limitations in 
Sec. 63.5988.
    (a) Overall control efficiency alternative. Use an emissions 
capture system and control device and demonstrate that the application 
booth emissions meet the emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, 
option 1a or 1b, and the control device and capture system meet the 
operating limits in Table 4 to this subpart.
    (b) Permanent total enclosure and control device efficiency 
alternative. Use a permanent total enclosure that satisfies the Method 
204 criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix M. Demonstrate that the 
control device meets the emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, 
option 1a or 1b. You must also show that the control device and capture 
system meet the operating limits in Table 4 to this subpart.
    (c) Monthly average alternative, without using an add-on control 
device. Use puncture sealants in such a way that the monthly average 
HAP emissions do not exceed the emission limits in Table 3 to this 
subpart, option 2.
    (d) Monthly average alternative, using an add-on control device. 
Use a control device to reduce HAP emissions so that monthly average 
HAP emissions do not exceed the emission limits in Table 3 to this 
subpart, option 2.

General Compliance Requirements


Sec. 63.5990  What are my general requirements for complying with this 
subpart?

    (a) You must be in compliance with the applicable emission 
limitations specified in Tables 1 through 4 to this subpart at all 
times, except during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction if 
you are using a control device to comply with an emission limit.
    (b) Except as provided in Sec. 63.5982(b)(4), you must always 
operate and maintain your affected source, including air pollution 
control and monitoring equipment, according to the provisions in 
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)(i).
    (c) During the period between the compliance date specified for 
your source in Sec. 63.5983 and the date upon which continuous 
compliance monitoring systems (CMS) have been installed and validated 
and any applicable operating limits have been set, you must maintain a 
log detailing the operation and maintenance of the process and emission 
control equipment.
    (d) For each affected source that complies with the emission limits 
in Tables 1 through 3 to this subpart using a control device, you must 
develop and implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan 
according to the provisions in Sec. 63.6(e)(3).
    (e) For each monitoring system required in this section, you must 
develop and submit for approval a site-specific monitoring plan that 
addresses the requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) through (3) of this 
section as follows:
    (1) Installation of the CMS sampling probe or other interface at a 
measurement location relative to each affected process unit so that the 
measurement is representative of control of the exhaust emissions 
(e.g., on or downstream of the last control device);
    (2) Performance and equipment specifications for the sample 
interface, the pollutant concentration or parametric signal analyzer, 
and the data collection and reduction system; and
    (3) Performance evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria 
(e.g., calibrations).
    (f) In your site-specific monitoring plan, you must also address 
the ongoing procedures specified in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of 
this section as follows:
    (1) Ongoing operation and maintenance procedures in accordance with 
the general requirements of Sec. 63.8(c)(1), (3), (4)(ii), (7), and 
(8), and this section;
    (2) Ongoing data quality assurance procedures in accordance with 
the general requirements of Sec. 63.8(d); and
    (3) Ongoing recordkeeping and reporting procedures in accordance 
with the general requirements of Sec. 63.10(c), (e)(1), and (e)(2)(i).

General Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements


Sec. 63.5991  By what date must I conduct an initial compliance 
demonstration or performance test?

    (a) If you have a new or reconstructed affected source, you must 
conduct each required initial compliance demonstration or performance 
test within 180 calendar days after the compliance date that is 
specified for your new or reconstructed affected source in 
Sec. 63.5983(a). If you are required to conduct a performance test, you 
must do so according to the provisions of Sec. 63.7(a)(2).
    (b) If you have an existing affected source, you must conduct each 
required initial compliance demonstration or performance test no later 
than the compliance date that is specified for your existing affected 
source in Sec. 63.5983(b). If you are required to conduct a performance 
test, you must do so according to the provisions of Sec. 63.7(a)(2).
    (c) If you commenced construction or reconstruction between October 
18, 2000 and July 9, 2002, you must demonstrate initial compliance with 
either the proposed emission limitations or the promulgated emission 
limitations no later than January 6, 2003, or within 180 calendar days 
after startup of the source, whichever is later, according to 
Sec. 63.7(a)(2)(ix).
    (d) If you commenced construction or reconstruction between October 
18, 2000 and July 9, 2002, and you chose to comply with the proposed 
emission limitation when demonstrating initial compliance, you must 
conduct a second compliance demonstration for the promulgated emission 
limitation no later than January 5, 2006, or after startup of the 
source, whichever is later, according to Sec. 63.7(a)(2)(ix).


Sec. 63.5992  When must I conduct subsequent performance tests?

    If you use a control system (add-on control device and capture 
system) to meet the emission limitations, you must also conduct a 
performance test at least once every 5 years following your initial 
compliance demonstration to verify control system performance and 
reestablish operating parameters or operating limits for control 
systems used to comply with the emissions limits.


Sec. 63.5993  What performance tests and other procedures must I use?

    (a) If you use a control system to meet the emission limitations, 
you must conduct each performance test in Table 5 to this subpart that 
applies to you.
    (b) Each performance test must be conducted according to the 
requirements in Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and under the specific conditions 
specified in Table 5 to this subpart.
    (c) You may not conduct performance tests during periods of 
startup, shutdown, or malfunction, as specified in Sec. 63.7(e)(1).

[[Page 45602]]

    (d) You must conduct three separate test runs for each performance 
test required in this section, as specified in Sec. 63.7(e)(1), unless 
otherwise specified in the test method. Each test run must last at 
least 1 hour.
    (e) If you are complying with the emission limitations using a 
control system, you must also conduct performance tests according to 
the requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) through (3) of this section as 
they apply to you.
    (1) Determining capture efficiency of permanent or temporary total 
enclosure. Determine the capture efficiency of a capture system by 
using one of the procedures in Table 5 to this subpart.
    (2) Determining capture efficiency of an alternative method. As an 
alternative to constructing a permanent or temporary total enclosure, 
you may determine the capture efficiency using any capture efficiency 
protocol and test methods if the data satisfy the criteria of either 
the Data Quality Objective or the Lower Confidence Limit approach in 
appendix A to subpart KK of this part.
    (3) Determining efficiency of an add-on control device. Use Table 5 
to this subpart to select the test methods for determining the 
efficiency of an add-on control device.

Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Tire Production 
Affected Sources


Sec. 63.5994  How do I conduct tests and procedures for tire production 
affected sources?

    (a) Methods to determine the mass percent of HAP in cements and 
solvents. To determine the HAP content in the cements and solvents used 
at your tire production affected source, use EPA Method 311 of appendix 
A of this part, an approved alternative method, or any other reasonable 
means for determining the HAP content of your cements and solvents. 
Other reasonable means include, but are not limited to: a material 
safety data sheet (MSDS), provided it contains appropriate information; 
a certified product data sheet (CPDS); or a manufacturer's hazardous 
air pollutant data sheet. You are not required to test the materials 
that you use, but the Administrator may require a test using EPA Method 
311 (or an approved alternative method) to confirm the reported HAP 
content. If the results of an analysis by EPA Method 311 are different 
from the HAP content determined by another means, the EPA Method 311 
results will govern compliance determinations.
    (b) Methods to demonstrate compliance with the HAP constituent 
emission limits in Table 1 to this subpart (option 1). Use the method 
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section to demonstrate initial and 
continuous compliance with the applicable emission limits for tire 
production affected sources using the compliance alternative described 
in Sec. 63.5985(a), purchase alternative. Use the equations in 
paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section to demonstrate initial and 
continuous compliance with the emission limits for tire production 
affected sources using the monthly average compliance alternatives 
described in Sec. 63.5985(b) and (c).
    (1) Determine the mass percent of each HAP in each cement and 
solvent according to the procedures in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (2) Use Equation 1 of this section to calculate the HAP emission 
rate for each monthly operating period when complying by using cements 
and solvents without using an add-on control device so that the monthly 
average HAP emissions do not exceed the HAP constituent emission limits 
in Table 1 to this subpart, option 1. Equation 1 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.000

Where:

Emonth=mass of the specific HAP emitted per total mass 
cements and solvents from all cements and solvents used in tire 
production per month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in cement and solvent i, as purchased, determined in 
accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
TMASSi=total mass of cement and solvent i used in the 
month, grams.
n=number of cements and solvents used in the month.

    (3) Use Equation 2 of this section to calculate the HAP emission 
rate for each monthly period when complying by using a control device 
to reduce HAP emissions so that the monthly average HAP emissions do 
not exceed the HAP constituent emission limits in Table 1 to this 
subpart (option 1). Equation 2 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.001

Where:

Emonth=mass of the specific HAP emitted per total mass 
cements and solvents from all cements and solvents used in tire 
production per month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in cement and solvent i, as purchased, determined in 
accordance with paragraph (a) of this section for cements and 
solvents used in the month in processes that are not routed to a 
control device.
TMASSi=total mass of cement and solvent i used in the 
month in processes that are not routed to a control device, grams.
n=number of cements and solvents used in the month in processes that 
are not routed to a control device.
HAPj=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in cement and solvent j, as purchased, determined in 
accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, for cements and 
solvents used in the month in

[[Page 45603]]

processes that are routed to a control device during operating days, 
which are defined as days when the control system is operating 
within the operating range established during the performance test 
and when monitoring data are collected.
TMASSj=total mass of cement and solvent j used in the 
month in processes that are routed to a control device during all 
operating days, grams.
EFF=efficiency of the control system determined during the 
performance test (capture system efficiency multiplied by the 
control device efficiency), percent.
m=number of cements and solvents used in the month that are routed 
to a control device during all operating days.
HAPk=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in cement and solvent k, as purchased, for cements and 
solvents used in the month in processes that are routed to a control 
device during non-control operating days, which are defined as days 
when either the control system is not operating within the operating 
range established during the performance test or when monitoring 
data are not collected.
TMASSk=total mass of cement and solvent k used in the 
month in processes that are routed to a control device during all 
non-control operating days, grams.
p=number of cements and solvents used in the month that are routed 
to a control device during all non-control operating days.

    (4) Each monthly calculation is a compliance demonstration for the 
purpose of this subpart.
    (c) Methods to demonstrate compliance with the production-based 
emission limits in Table 1 to this subpart, option 2. Use the methods 
and equations in paragraphs (c)(1) through (6) of this section to 
demonstrate initial and continuous compliance with the production-based 
emission limits for tire production affected sources using the 
compliance alternatives described in Sec. 63.5985(b) and (c).
    (1) Methods to determine the mass percent of each HAP in cements 
and solvents. Determine the mass percent of all HAP in cements and 
solvents using the applicable methods specified in paragraph (a) of 
this section.
    (2) Quantity of rubber used. Determine your quantity of rubber used 
(megagrams) by accounting for the total mass of mixed rubber compound 
that is delivered to the tire production operation.
    (3) Compliance without use of an add-on control device. If you do 
not use an add-on control device to meet the emission limits, use 
Equation 3 of this section to calculate the monthly HAP emission rate 
in grams of HAP emitted per megagram of rubber used, using the quantity 
of rubber used per month (megagrams), as determined in paragraph (c)(2) 
of this section so that the monthly average HAP emission does not 
exceed the HAP emission limit in Table 1 to this subpart, option 2. 
Equation 3 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.002

Where:

Emonth=mass of all HAP emitted per total mass of rubber 
used month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of all HAP in 
cement and solvent i, as purchased, determined in accordance with 
paragraph (a) of this section.
TMASSi=total mass of cement and solvent i used in the 
month, grams.
n=number of cements and solvents used in the month.
RMASS=total mass of rubber used per month, megagrams.

    (4) Compliance with use of an add-on control device. If you use a 
control device to meet the emission limits, use Equation 4 of this 
section to calculate the monthly HAP emission rate in grams of HAP 
emitted per megagram of rubber used, using the quantity of rubber used 
per month (megagrams), as determined in paragraph (c)(2) of this 
section so that the monthly average HAP emission does not exceed the 
HAP emission limit in Table 1 of this subpart, option 2. Equation 4 
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.003

Where:

Emonth=mass of all HAP emitted per total mass rubber used 
per month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of all HAP in 
cement and solvent i, as purchased, determined in accordance with 
paragraph (a) of this section for cements and solvents used in the 
month in processes that are not routed to a control device.
TMASSi=total mass of cement and solvent i used in the 
month in processes that are not routed to a control device, grams.
n=number of cements and solvents used in the month in processes that 
are not routed to a control device.
HAPj=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of all HAP in 
cement and solvent j, as purchased, determined in accordance with 
paragraph (a) of this section, for cements and solvents used in the 
month in processes that are routed to a control device during 
operating days, which are defined as days when the control system is 
operating within the operating range established during the 
performance test and when monitoring data are collected.
TMASSj=total mass of cement and solvent j used in the 
month in processes that are routed to a control device during all 
operating days.
EFF=efficiency of the control system determined during the 
performance test (capture system efficiency multiplied by the 
control device efficiency), percent.
m=number of cements and solvents used in the month that are routed 
to a control device during all operating days.
HAPk=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in cement and solvent k, as purchased, for cements and 
solvents used in the month in processes that are routed to a control 
device during non-control operating days, which are defined as days 
when either the control system is not operating within the operating 
range established during the performance test or when monitoring 
data are not collected.
TMASSk=total mass of cement and solvent k used in the 
month in processes that are routed to a control device during all 
non-control operating days, grams.
p=number of cements and solvents used in the month that are routed 
to a control device during all non-control operating days.
RMASS=total mass of rubber used per month, megagrams.

    (5) Each monthly calculation is a compliance demonstration for the 
purpose of this subpart.
    (d) Specific compliance demonstration requirements for tire 
production affected sources. (1) Conduct any required compliance 
demonstration according to the requirements in Sec. 63.5993.
    (2) If you are demonstrating compliance with the HAP constituent 
option in Table 1 to this subpart, option 1, conduct the compliance 
demonstration using cements and solvents that are representative of 
cements and solvents typically used at your tire production affected 
source.
    (3) Establish an operating range that corresponds to the control 
efficiency as described in Table 5 to this subpart.
    (e) How to take credit for HAP emissions reductions from add-on 
control devices. If you want to take credit in Equations 2 and 4 of 
this

[[Page 45604]]

section for HAP emissions reduced using a control system, you must meet 
the requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Monitor the established operating parameters as appropriate.
    (i) If you use a thermal oxidizer, monitor the firebox secondary 
chamber temperature.
    (ii) If you use a carbon adsorber, monitor the total regeneration 
stream mass or volumetric flow for each regeneration cycle, and the 
carbon bed temperature after each regeneration, and within 15 minutes 
of completing any cooling cycle.
    (iii) If you use a control device other than a thermal oxidizer or 
a regenerative carbon adsorber, install and operate a continuous 
parameter monitoring system according to your site-specific performance 
test plan submitted according to Sec. 63.7(c)(2)(i).
    (iv) If you use a permanent total enclosure, monitor the face 
velocity across the natural draft openings (NDO) in the enclosure. 
Also, if you use an enclosure, monitor to ensure that the sizes of the 
NDO have not changed, that there are no new NDO, and that a HAP 
emission source has not been moved closer to an NDO since the last 
compliance demonstration was conducted.
    (v) If you use other capture systems, monitor the parameters 
identified in your monitoring plan.
    (2) Maintain the operating parameters within the operating range 
established during the compliance demonstration.
    (f) How to take credit for HAP emissions reductions when streams 
are combined. When performing material balances to demonstrate 
compliance, if the storage of materials, exhaust, or the wastewater 
from more than one affected source are combined at the point where 
control systems are applied, any credit for emissions reductions needs 
to be prorated among the affected sources based on the ratio of their 
contribution to the uncontrolled emissions.


Sec. 63.5995  What are my monitoring installation, operation, and 
maintenance requirements?

    (a) For each operating parameter that you are required by 
Sec. 63.5994(e)(1) to monitor, you must install, operate, and maintain 
a continuous parameter monitoring system (CPMS) according to the 
requirements in Sec. 63.5990(e) and (f) and in paragraphs (a)(1) 
through (6) of this section.
    (1) You must operate your CPMS at all times that the process is 
operating.
    (2) You must collect data from at least four equally spaced periods 
each hour.
    (3) For at least 75 percent of the hours in an operating day, you 
must have valid data (as defined in your site-specific monitoring plan) 
for at least four equally spaced periods each hour.
    (4) For each hour that you have valid data from at least four 
equally spaced periods, you must calculate the hourly average value 
using all valid data.
    (5) You must calculate the daily average using all of the hourly 
averages calculated according to paragraph (a)(3) of this section for 
the 24-hour period.
    (6) You must record the results for each inspection, calibration, 
and validation check as specified in your site-specific monitoring 
plan.
    (b) For each temperature monitoring device, you must meet the 
requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) through (8) of this section.
    (1) Locate the temperature sensor in a position that provides a 
representative temperature.
    (2) For a non-cryogenic temperature range, use a temperature sensor 
with a minimum measurement sensitivity of 2.2 degrees centigrade or 
0.75 percent of the temperature value, whichever is larger.
    (3) For a cryogenic temperature range, use a temperature sensor 
with a minimum measurement sensitivity of 2.2 degrees centigrade or 2 
percent of the temperature value, whichever is larger.
    (4) Shield the temperature sensor system from electromagnetic 
interference and chemical contaminants.
    (5) If a chart recorder is used, it must have a sensitivity in the 
minor division of at least 20 degrees Fahrenheit.
    (6) Perform an electronic calibration at least semiannually 
according to the procedures in the manufacturer's owners manual. 
Following the electronic calibration, you must conduct a temperature 
sensor validation check in which a second or redundant temperature 
sensor placed near the process temperature sensor must yield a reading 
within 16.7 degrees centigrade of the process temperature sensor's 
reading.
    (7) Conduct calibration and validation checks any time the sensor 
exceeds the manufacturer's specified maximum operating temperature 
range or install a new temperature sensor.
    (8) At least monthly, inspect all components for integrity and all 
electrical connections for continuity, oxidation, and galvanic 
corrosion.
    (c) For each integrating regeneration stream flow monitoring device 
associated with a carbon adsorber, you must meet the requirements in 
paragraphs (a) and (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Use a device that has an accuracy of 10 percent or 
better.
    (2) Use a device that is capable of recording the total 
regeneration stream mass or volumetric flow for each regeneration 
cycle.
    (d) For any other control device, or for other capture systems, 
ensure that the CPMS is operated according to a monitoring plan 
submitted to the Administrator with the compliance status report 
required by Sec. 63.9(h). The monitoring plan must meet the 
requirements in paragraphs (a) and (d)(1) through (3) of this section. 
Conduct monitoring in accordance with the plan submitted to the 
Administrator unless comments received from the Administrator require 
an alternate monitoring scheme.
    (1) Identify the operating parameter to be monitored to ensure that 
the control or capture efficiency measured during the initial 
compliance test is maintained.
    (2) Discuss why this parameter is appropriate for demonstrating 
ongoing compliance.
    (3) Identify the specific monitoring procedures.
    (e) For each pressure differential monitoring device, you must meet 
the requirements in paragraphs (a) and (e)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Conduct a quarterly EPA Method 2 procedure (found in 40 CFR 
part 60, appendix A) on the applicable NDOs and use the results to 
calibrate the pressure monitor if the difference in results are greater 
than 10 percent.
    (2) Inspect the NDO monthly to ensure that their size has not 
changed, that there are no new NDO, and that no HAP sources have been 
moved closer to the NDO than when the last performance test was 
conducted.


Sec. 63.5996  How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission 
limits for tire production affected sources?

    (a) You must demonstrate initial compliance with each emission 
limit that applies to you according to Table 6 to this subpart.
    (b) You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status 
containing the results of the initial compliance demonstration 
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.6009(e).

Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Tire Cord Production 
Affected Sources


Sec. 63.5997  How do I conduct tests and procedures for tire cord 
production affected sources?

    (a) Methods to determine the mass percent of each HAP in coatings. 
(1) To determine the HAP content in the

[[Page 45605]]

coating used at your tire cord production affected source, use EPA 
Method 311 of appendix A of this part, an approved alternative method, 
or any other reasonable means for determining the HAP content of your 
coatings. Other reasonable means include, but are not limited to: an 
MSDS, provided it contains appropriate information; a CPDS; or a 
manufacturer's HAP data sheet. You are not required to test the 
materials that you use, but the Administrator may require a test using 
EPA Method 311 (or an approved alternative method) to confirm the 
reported HAP content. If the results of an analysis by EPA Method 311 
are different from the HAP content determined by another means, the EPA 
Method 311 results will govern compliance determinations.
    (2) Unless you demonstrate otherwise, the HAP content analysis must 
be based on coatings prior to any cross-linking reactions, i.e., 
curing. However, you may account for differences in HAP emissions 
resulting from chemical reactions based on the conversion rates of the 
individual coating formulations, chemistry demonstrations, or other 
demonstrations that are verifiable to the approving agency. Use the 
revised value in your compliance demonstration in the relevant 
equations in paragraph (b) of this section.
    (b) Methods to determine compliance with the emission limits in 
Table 2 to this subpart, option 1. Use the equations in this paragraph 
(b) to demonstrate initial and continuous compliance with the emission 
limits for tire cord production sources using the compliance 
alternatives described in Sec. 63.5987(a) and (b).
    (1) Determine mass percent of HAP. Determine the mass percent of 
all HAP in each coating according to the procedures in paragraph (a) of 
this section.
    (2) Compliance without use of an add-on control device. If you do 
not use an add-on control device to meet the emission limits, use 
Equation 1 of this section to calculate the monthly HAP emission rate 
in grams of HAP emitted per megagram of fabric processed at the tire 
cord production source to show that the monthly average HAP emissions 
do not exceed the emission limits in Table 2 to this subpart, option 1. 
Equation 1 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.004

Where:

Emonth=mass of all HAP emitted per total mass of fabric 
processed in the month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of all HAP in 
the coating i, prior to curing and including any application station 
dilution, determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this 
section.
TCOATi=total mass of coating i made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month, grams.
n=number of coatings used in the month.
TFAB=total mass of fabric processed in the month, megagrams.

    (3) Compliance with use of an add-on control device. If you use a 
control device to meet the emission limits, use Equation 2 of this 
section to calculate the monthly HAP emission rate in grams of HAP 
emitted per megagram of fabric processed to show that the monthly 
average HAP emissions do not exceed the HAP emission limit in Table 2 
of this subpart, option 1. Equation 2 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.005

Where:

Emonth=mass of all HAP emitted per total mass of fabric 
processed in the month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of all HAP in 
coating i, prior to curing and including any application stations 
dilution, determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this 
section, for coatings used in the month in processes that are not 
routed to a control device.
TCOATi=total mass of coating i made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month in processes that 
are not routed to a control device, grams.
n=number of coatings used in the month in processes that are not 
routed to a control device.
HAPj=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of all HAP in 
coating j, prior to curing and including any application station 
dilution, determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this 
section, for coatings used in the month in processes that are routed 
to a control device during operating days, which are defined as days 
when the control system is operating within the operating range 
established during the performance test and when monitoring data are 
collected.
TCOATj=total mass of coating j made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month in processes that 
are routed to a control device during all operating days, grams.
EFF=efficiency of the control system determined during the 
performance test (capture system efficiency multiplied by the 
control device efficiency), percent.
m=number of coatings used in the month that are routed to a control 
device during all operating days.
HAPk=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of all HAP in 
coating k, prior to curing and including any application station 
dilution, for coatings used in the month in processes that are 
routed to a control device during non-control operating days, which 
are defined as days when either the control system is not operating 
within the operating range established during the performance test 
or when monitoring data are not collected.
TCOATk=total mass of coating k made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month in processes that 
are routed to a control device during all non-control operating 
days, grams.
p=number of coatings used in the month that are routed to a control 
device during all non-control operating days.
TFAB=total mass of fabric processed in the month, megagrams.

    (4) Each monthly calculation is a compliance demonstration for the 
purpose of this subpart.
    (c) Methods to determine compliance with the emission limits in 
Table 2 of this subpart, option 2. Use the equations in this paragraph 
(c) to demonstrate initial and continuous compliance with the emission 
limits for tire cord production sources using the compliance 
alternatives described in Sec. 63.5987(a) and (b).
    (1) Determine the mass percent of each HAP in each coating 
according to the procedures in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (2) Use Equation 3 of this section to calculate the monthly average 
HAP emission rate when complying by using coatings without using an 
add-on control device to show that the monthly average HAP emissions do 
not exceed the emission limits in Table 2 to this subpart, option 2. 
Equation 3 follows:

[[Page 45606]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.006

Where:

Emonth=mass of the specific HAP emitted per total mass of 
coatings from all coatings made and used in tire cord fabric 
production per month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in the coating i, prior to curing and including any 
application station dilution, determined in accordance with 
paragraph (a) of this section.
TCOATi=total mass of coating i made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month, grams.
n=number of coatings used in the month.

    (3) Use Equation 4 of this section to calculate the monthly average 
HAP emission rate when complying by using an add-on control device to 
show that the monthly average HAP emissions do not exceed the emission 
limits in Table 2 to this subpart, option 2. Equation 4 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.007

Where:

Emonth=mass of the specific HAP emitted per total mass of 
coatings from all coatings made and used in tire cord fabric 
production per month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in coating i, prior to curing and including any 
application station dilution, determined in accordance with 
paragraph (a) of this section, for coatings used in the month in 
processes that are not routed to a control device.
TCOATi=total mass of coating i made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month in processes that 
are not routed to a control device, grams.
n=number of coatings used in the month in processes that are not 
routed to a control device.
HAPj=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in coating j, prior to curing and including any 
application station dilution, determined in accordance with 
paragraph (a) of this section, for coatings used in the month in 
processes that are routed to a control device during operating days, 
which are defined as days when the control system is operating 
within the operating range established during the performance test 
and when monitoring data are collected.
TCOATj=total mass of coating i made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month in processes that 
are routed to a control device during all operating days, grams.
EFF=efficiency of the control system determined during the 
performance test (capture system efficiency multiplied by the 
control device efficiency), percent.
m=number of coatings used in the month that are routed to a control 
device during all operating days.
HAPk=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in coating k, prior to curing and including any 
application station dilution, for coatings used in the month in 
processes that are routed to a control device during non-control 
operating days, which are defined as days when either the control 
system is not operating within the operating range established 
during the performance test or when monitoring data are not 
collected.
TCOATk=total mass of coating i made and used for 
application to fabric at the facility in the month in processes that 
are routed to a control device during all non-control operating 
days, grams.
p = number of coatings used in the month that are routed to a 
control device during all non-control operating days.
    (4) Each monthly calculation is a compliance demonstration for 
the purpose of this subpart.
    (d) Specific compliance demonstration requirements for tire cord 
production affected sources. (1) Conduct any required compliance 
demonstrations according to the requirements in Sec. 63.5993.
    (2) Conduct the compliance demonstration using coatings with 
average mass percent HAP content that are representative of the 
coatings typically used at your tire cord production affected 
source.
    (3) Establish an operating range that corresponds to the control 
efficiency as described in Table 5 to this subpart.
    (e) How to take credit for HAP emissions reductions from add-on 
control devices. If you want to take credit in Equations 2 and 4 of 
this section for HAP emissions reduced using a control system, you 
must meet the requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this 
section.
    (1) Monitor the established operating parameters as appropriate.
    (i) If you use a thermal oxidizer, continuously monitor the 
firebox secondary chamber temperature.
    (ii) If you use a carbon adsorber, monitor the total 
regeneration stream mass or volumetric flow for each regeneration 
cycle and the carbon bed temperature after each regeneration and 
within 15 minutes of completing any cooling cycle.
    (iii) If you use a control device other than a thermal oxidizer 
or a regenerative carbon adsorber, install and operate a continuous 
parameter monitoring system according to your site-specific 
performance test plan submitted according to Sec. 63.7(c)(2)(i).
    (iv) If you use a permanent total enclosure, monitor the face 
velocity across the NDO in the enclosure. Also, if you use an 
enclosure, monitor to ensure that the sizes of the NDO have not 
changed, that there are no new NDO, and that a HAP emission source 
has not been moved closer to an NDO since the last performance test 
was conducted.
    (v) If you use other capture systems, monitor the parameters 
identified in your monitoring plan.
    (2) Maintain the operating parameter within the operating range 
established during the compliance demonstration.
    (f) How to take credit for HAP emissions reductions when streams 
are combined. When performing material balances to demonstrate 
compliance, if the storage of materials, exhaust, or the wastewater 
from more than one affected source are combined at the point where 
control systems are applied, any credit for emissions reductions 
needs to be prorated among the affected sources based on the ratio 
of their contribution to the uncontrolled emissions.


Sec. 63.5998  What are my monitoring installation, operation, and 
maintenance requirements?

    For each operating parameter that you are required by 
Sec. 63.5997(e)(1) to monitor, you must install, operate, and maintain 
a continuous parameter monitoring system according to the provisions in 
Sec. 63.5995(a) through (e).

[[Page 45607]]

Sec. 63.5999  How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission 
limits for tire cord production affected sources?

    (a) You must demonstrate initial compliance with each emission 
limit that applies to you according to Table 7 to this subpart.
    (b) You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status 
containing the results of the initial compliance demonstration 
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.6009(e).

Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements for Puncture Sealant 
Application Affected Sources


Sec. 63.6000  How do I conduct tests and procedures for puncture 
sealant application affected sources?

    (a) Methods to determine compliance with the puncture sealant 
application emission limitations in Table 3 to this subpart. Use the 
methods and equations in paragraph (b) of this section to demonstrate 
initial and continuous compliance with the overall control efficiency 
compliance alternatives described in Sec. 63.5989(a) and (b). Use the 
methods and equations in paragraphs (c) through (g) of this section to 
demonstrate initial and continuous compliance with the HAP constituent 
compliance alternative described in Sec. 63.5989(c) and (d).
    (b) Methods to determine compliance with the emission limits in 
Table 3 to this subpart, option 1. Follow the test procedures described 
in Sec. 63.5993 to determine the overall control efficiency of your 
system.
    (1) You must also meet the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and 
(ii) of this section.
    (i) Conduct the performance test using a puncture sealant with an 
average mass percent HAP content that is representative of the puncture 
sealants typically used at your puncture sealant application affected 
source.
    (ii) Establish all applicable operating limit ranges that 
correspond to the control system efficiency as described in Table 5 to 
this subpart.
    (2) Use Equation 1 of this section to calculate the overall 
efficiency of the control system. If you have a permanent total 
enclosure that satisfies EPA Method 204 (found in 40 CFR part 51, 
appendix M) criteria, assume 100 percent capture efficiency for 
variable F. Equation 1 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.008

Where:

R=overall control system efficiency, percent.
F=capture efficiency of the capture system on add-on control device, 
percent, determined during the performance test.
E=control efficiency of add-on control device k, percent, determined 
during the performance test.

    (3) Monitor the established operating limits as appropriate.
    (i) If you use a thermal oxidizer, monitor the firebox secondary 
chamber temperature.
    (ii) If you use a carbon adsorber, monitor the total regeneration 
stream mass or volumetric flow for each regeneration cycle, and the 
carbon bed temperature after each regeneration, and within 15 minutes 
of completing any cooling cycle.
    (iii) For each control device used other than a thermal oxidizer or 
a regenerative carbon adsorber, install and operate a continuous 
parameter monitoring system according to your site-specific performance 
test plan submitted according to Sec. 63.7(c)(2)(i).
    (iv) If you use a permanent total enclosure, monitor the face 
velocity across the NDO in the enclosure. Also, if you use an 
enclosure, monitor to ensure that the sizes of the NDO have not 
changed, that there are no new NDO, and that a HAP emission source has 
not been moved closer to an NDO since the last performance test was 
conducted.
    (v) If you use other capture systems, monitor the parameters 
identified in your monitoring plan.
    (vi) Maintain the operating parameter within the operating range 
established during the performance test.
    (c) Methods to determine the mass percent of each HAP in puncture 
sealants. To determine the HAP content in the puncture sealant used at 
your puncture sealant application affected source, use EPA Method 311 
of appendix A of 40 CFR part 63, an approved alternative method, or any 
other reasonable means for determining the HAP content of your puncture 
sealants. Other reasonable means include, but are not limited to: an 
MSDS, provided it contains appropriate information; a CPDS; or a 
manufacturer's hazardous air pollutant data sheet. You are not required 
to test the materials that you use, but the Administrator may require a 
test using EPA Method 311 (or an approved alternative method) to 
confirm the reported HAP content. If the results of an analysis by EPA 
Method 311 are different from the HAP content determined by another 
means, the EPA Method 311 results will govern compliance 
determinations.
    (d) Methods to determine compliance with the emission limits in 
Table 3 to this subpart, option 2. Use the equations in this paragraph 
(d) to demonstrate initial and continuous compliance with the HAP 
constituent emission limits for puncture sealant application affected 
sources using the compliance alternatives described in Sec. 63.5989(c) 
and (d).
    (1) Use Equation 2 of this section to calculate the monthly average 
HAP emission rate when complying by using puncture sealants without 
using an add-on control device to show that the monthly average HAP 
emissions do not exceed the emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, 
option 2. Equation 2 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.009

Where:

Emonth=mass of the specific HAP emitted per total mass of 
puncture sealants from all puncture sealants used at the puncture

[[Page 45608]]

sealant affected source per month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in puncture sealant i, including any application booth 
dilution, determined in accordance with paragraph (c) of this 
section.
TPSEALi=total mass of puncture sealant i used in the 
month, grams.
n=number of puncture sealants used in the month.

    (2) Use Equation 3 of this section to calculate the monthly average 
HAP emission rate when complying by using puncture sealants by using an 
add-on control device to show that the monthly average HAP emissions do 
not exceed the emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, option 2. 
Equation 3 follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09JY02.010

Where:

Emonth=mass of the specific HAP emitted per total mass of 
puncture sealants used at the puncture sealant affected source per 
month, grams per megagram.
HAPi=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP in puncture sealant i, including any application booth 
dilution, determined in accordance with paragraph (c) of this 
section for puncture sealants used in the month in processes that 
are not routed to a control device.
TPSEALi=total mass of puncture sealant i used in the 
month in processes that are not routed to a control device, gram.
n=number of puncture sealants used in the month in processes that 
are not routed to a control device.
HAPj=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP, in puncture sealant j, including any application booth 
dilution, determined in accordance with paragraph (c) of this 
section, for puncture sealants used in the month in processes that 
are routed to a control device during operating days, which are 
defined as days when the control system is operating within the 
operating range established during the performance test and when 
monitoring data are collected.
TPSEALj=total mass of puncture sealant j used in the 
month in processes that are routed to a control device during all 
operating days, grams.
EFF=efficiency of the control system determined during the 
performance test (capture system efficiency multiplied by the 
control device efficiency), percent.
m=number of puncture sealants used in the month that are routed to a 
control device during all operating days.
HAPk=mass percent, expressed as a decimal, of the 
specific HAP, in puncture sealant k, including any application booth 
dilution, for puncture sealants used in the month in processes that 
are routed to a control device during non-control operating days, 
which are defined as days when either the control system is not 
operating within the operating range established during the 
performance test or when monitoring data are not collected.
TPSEALk=total mass of total mass of puncture sealant k 
used in the month in processes that are routed to a control device 
during all non-control operating days, grams.
p=number of puncture sealants used in the month that are routed to a 
control device during all non-control operating days.

    (3) Each monthly calculation is a compliance demonstration for the 
purpose of this subpart.
    (e) Specific compliance demonstration requirements for puncture 
sealant application affected sources. (1) Conduct any required 
compliance demonstrations according to the requirements in 
Sec. 63.5993.
    (2) Conduct the compliance demonstration using a puncture sealant 
with average mass percent HAP content that is representative of the 
puncture sealants typically used at your puncture sealant application 
affected source.
    (3) Establish an operating range that corresponds to the 
appropriate control efficiency described in Table 5 to this subpart.
    (f) How to take credit for HAP emissions reductions from add-on 
control devices. If you want to take credit in Equation 3 of this 
section for HAP emissions reduced using a control system, you must 
monitor the established operating parameters as appropriate and meet 
the requirements in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
    (g) How to take credit for HAP emissions reductions when streams 
are combined. When performing material balances to demonstrate 
compliance, if the storage of materials, exhaust, or the wastewater 
from more than one affected source are combined at the point where 
control systems are applied, any credit for emissions reductions needs 
to be prorated among the affected sources based on the ratio of their 
contribution to the uncontrolled emissions.


Sec. 63.6001  What are my monitoring installation, operation, and 
maintenance requirements?

    For each operating limit that you are required by 
Sec. 63.6000(b)(3) to monitor or each operating parameter that you are 
required by Sec. 63.6000(f) to monitor, you must install, operate, and 
maintain a continuous parameter monitoring system according to the 
provisions in Sec. 63.5995(a) through (e).


Sec. 63.6002  How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission 
limits for puncture sealant application affected sources?

    (a) You must demonstrate initial compliance with each emission 
limit that applies to you according to Table 8 to this subpart.
    (b) You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status 
containing the results of the initial compliance demonstration 
according to the requirements in Sec. 63.6009(e).

Continuous Compliance Requirements for Tire Production Affected Sources


Sec. 63.6003  How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate 
continuous compliance with the emission limits for tire production 
affected sources?

    (a) You must monitor and collect data as specified in Table 9 to 
this subpart.
    (b) Except for periods of monitoring malfunctions, associated 
repairs, and required quality assurance or control activities 
(including, as applicable, calibration checks and required zero and 
span adjustments), you must monitor continuously (or collect data at 
all required intervals) while the affected source is operating. This 
includes periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction when the 
affected source is operating.
    (c) In data average calculations and calculations used to report 
emission or operating levels, you may not use data recorded during 
periods of monitoring malfunctions or associated repairs, or recorded 
during required quality assurance or control activities. Such data may 
not be used in fulfilling any applicable minimum data availability 
requirement. You must use all the data collected during all other 
periods in assessing the operation of the control device and associated 
control system.

[[Page 45609]]

Sec. 63.6004  How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the 
emission limits for tire production affected sources?

    (a) You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each applicable 
limit in Table 1 to this subpart using the methods specified in Table 
10 to this subpart.
    (b) You must report each instance in which you did not meet an 
emission limit in Table 1 to this subpart. You must also report each 
instance in which you did not meet the applicable requirements in Table 
10 to this subpart. These instances are deviations from the emission 
limits in this subpart. The deviations must be reported in accordance 
with the requirements in Sec. 63.6010(e).
    (c) You also must meet the following requirements if you are 
complying with the purchase alternative for tire production sources 
described in Sec. 63.5985(a):
    (1) If, after you submit the Notification of Compliance Status, you 
use a cement or solvent for which you have not previously verified 
percent HAP mass using the methods in Sec. 63.5994(a), you must verify 
that each cement and solvent used in the affected source meets the 
emission limit, using any of the methods in Sec. 63.5994(a).
    (2) You must update the list of all the cements and solvents used 
at the affected source.
    (3) With the compliance report for the reporting period during 
which you used the new cement or solvent, you must submit the updated 
list of all cements and solvents and a statement certifying that, as 
purchased, each cement and solvent used at the affected source during 
the reporting period met the emission limits in Table 1 to this 
subpart.

Continuous Compliance Requirements for Tire Cord Production Affected 
Sources


Sec. 63.6005  How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate 
continuous compliance with the emission limits for tire cord production 
affected sources?

    (a) You must monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous 
compliance with the emission limits for tire cord production affected 
sources as specified in Table 11 to this subpart.
    (b) You must monitor and collect data according to the requirements 
in Sec. 63.6003(b) and (c).


Sec. 63.6006  How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the 
emission limits for tire cord production affected sources?

    (a) You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each applicable 
emission limit in Table 2 to this subpart using the methods specified 
in Table 12 to this subpart.
    (b) You must report each instance in which you did not meet an 
applicable emission limit in Table 2 to this subpart. You must also 
report each instance in which you did not meet the applicable 
requirements in Table 12 to this subpart. These instances are 
deviations from the emission limits in this subpart. The deviations 
must be reported in accordance with the requirements in 
Sec. 63.6010(e).

Continuous Compliance Requirements for Puncture Sealant Application 
Affected Sources


Sec. 63.6007  How do I monitor and collect data to demonstrate 
continuous compliance with the emission limitations for puncture 
sealant application affected sources?

    (a) You must monitor and collect data to demonstrate continuous 
compliance with the emission limitations for puncture sealant 
application affected sources as specified in Table 13 to this subpart.
    (b) You must monitor and collect data according to the requirements 
in Sec. 63.6003(b) and (c).


Sec. 63.6008  How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the 
emission limitations for puncture sealant application affected sources?

    (a) You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each applicable 
emission limitation in Tables 3 and 4 to this subpart using the methods 
specified in Table 14 to this subpart.
    (b) You must report each instance in which you did not meet an 
applicable emission limit in Table 3 to this subpart. You must also 
report each instance in which you did not meet the applicable 
requirements in Table 14 to this subpart. These instances are 
deviations from the emission limits in this subpart. The deviations 
must be reported in accordance with the requirements in 
Sec. 63.6010(e).

Notifications, Reports, and Records


Sec. 63.6009  What notifications must I submit and when?

    (a) You must submit all of the notifications in Secs. 63.7 (b) and 
(c), 63.8(f) (4) and (6), and 63.9 (b) through (e) and (h) that apply 
to you by the dates specified.
    (b) As specified in Sec. 63.9(b)(2), if you startup your affected 
source before July 9, 2002, you must submit an Initial Notification not 
later than November 6, 2002.
    (c) As specified in Sec. 63.9(b)(3), if you startup your new or 
reconstructed affected source on or after July 9, 2002, you must submit 
an Initial Notification not later than 120 calendar days after you 
become subject to this subpart.
    (d) If you are required to conduct a performance test, you must 
submit a notification of intent to conduct a performance test at least 
60 calendar days before the performance test is scheduled to begin as 
required in Sec. 63.7(b)(1).
    (e) If you are required to conduct a performance test, design 
evaluation, or other initial compliance demonstration as specified in 
Tables 5 through 8 to this subpart, you must submit a Notification of 
Compliance Status according to Sec. 63.9(h)(2)(ii). The Notification 
must contain the information listed in Table 15 to this subpart for 
compliance reports. The Notification of Compliance Status must be 
submitted according to the following schedules, as appropriate:
    (1) For each initial compliance demonstration required in Tables 6 
through 8 to this subpart that does not include a performance test, you 
must submit the Notification of Compliance Status before the close of 
business on the 30th calendar day following the completion of the 
initial compliance demonstration.
    (2) For each initial compliance demonstration required in Tables 6 
through 8 to this subpart that includes a performance test conducted 
according to the requirements in Table 5 to this subpart, you must 
submit the Notification of Compliance Status, including the performance 
test results, before the close of business on the 60th calendar day 
following the completion of the performance test according to 
Sec. 63.10(d)(2).
    (f) For each tire production affected source, the Notification of 
Compliance Status must also identify the emission limit option in 
Sec. 63.5984 and the compliance alternative in Sec. 63.5985 that you 
have chosen to meet.
    (g) For each tire production affected source complying with the 
purchase compliance alternative in Sec. 63.5985(a), the Notification of 
Compliance Status must also include the information listed in 
paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) A list of each cement and solvent, as purchased, that is used 
at the affected source and the manufacturer or supplier of each.
    (2) The individual HAP content (percent by mass) of each cement and 
solvent that is used.
    (h) For each tire production or tire cord production affected 
source using a control device, the Notification of Compliance Status 
must also include the information in paragraphs (h) (1) and (2) of this 
section for each operating

[[Page 45610]]

parameter in Secs. 63.5994(e)(1) and 63.5997(e)(1) that applies to you.
    (1) The operating parameter value averaged over the full period of 
the performance test (e.g., average secondary chamber firebox 
temperature over the period of the performance test was 1,500 degrees 
Fahrenheit).
    (2) The operating parameter range within which HAP emissions are 
reduced to the level corresponding to meeting the applicable emission 
limits in Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart.
    (i) For each puncture sealant application affected source using a 
control device, the Notification of Compliance Status must include the 
information in paragraphs (i)(1) and (2) of this section for each 
operating limit in Sec. 63.6000(b)(3) and each operating parameter in 
Sec. 63.6000(f).
    (1) The operating limit or operating parameter value averaged over 
the full period of the performance test.
    (2) The operating limit or operating parameter range within which 
HAP emissions are reduced to the levels corresponding to meeting the 
applicable emission limitations in Table 3 to this subpart.
    (j) For each tire cord production affected source required to 
assess the predominant use for coating web substrates as required by 
Sec. 63.5981(b), you must submit a notice of the results of the 
reassessment within 30 days of completing the reassessment. The notice 
shall specify whether this subpart XXXX is still the applicable subpart 
and, if it is not, which part 63 subpart is applicable.


Sec. 63.6010  What reports must I submit and when?

    (a) You must submit each applicable report in Table 15 to this 
subpart.
    (b) Unless the Administrator has approved a different schedule for 
submission of reports under Sec. 63.10(a), you must submit each report 
by the date in Table 15 to this subpart and according to the 
requirements in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
    (1) The first compliance report must cover the period beginning on 
the compliance date that is specified for your affected source in 
Sec. 63.5983 and ending on June 30 or December 31, whichever date is 
the first date following the end of the first calendar half after the 
compliance date that is specified for your source in Sec. 63.5983.
    (2) The first compliance report must be postmarked or delivered no 
later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date follows the end of the 
first calendar half after the compliance date that is specified for 
your affected source in Sec. 63.5983.
    (3) Each subsequent compliance report must cover the semiannual 
reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual 
reporting period from July 1 through December 31.
    (4) Each subsequent compliance report must be postmarked or 
delivered no later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date is the 
first date following the end of the semiannual reporting period.
    (5) For each affected source that is subject to permitting subparts 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71, and if the permitting 
authority has established dates for submitting semiannual reports 
pursuant to 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), you 
may submit the first and subsequent compliance reports according to the 
dates the permitting authority has established instead of according to 
the dates in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section.
    (c) The compliance report must contain information specified in 
paragraphs (c)(1) through (10) of this section.
    (1) Company name and address.
    (2) Statement by a responsible official, with that official's name, 
title, and signature, certifying the accuracy of the content of the 
report.
    (3) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting 
period.
    (4) If you had a startup, shutdown or malfunction during the 
reporting period and you took actions consistent with your startup, 
shutdown, and malfunction plan, the compliance report must include the 
information in Sec. 63.10(d)(5)(i).
    (5) If there are no deviations from any emission limitations 
(emission limit or operating limit) that applies to you, a statement 
that there were no deviations from the emission limitations during the 
reporting period.
    (6) If there were no periods during which the operating parameter 
monitoring systems were out-of-control as specified in Sec. 63.8(c)(7), 
a statement that there were no periods during which the operating 
parameter monitoring systems or CPMS were out-of-control during the 
reporting period.
    (7) For each tire production affected source, the emission limit 
option in Sec. 63.5984 and the compliance alternative in Sec. 63.5985 
that you have chosen to meet.
    (8) For each tire production affected source complying with the 
purchase compliance alternative in Sec. 63.5985(a), and for each annual 
reporting period during which you use a cement and solvent that, as 
purchased, was not included in the list submitted with the Notification 
of Compliance Status in Sec. 63.6009(g), an updated list of all cements 
and solvents used, as purchased, at the affected source. You must also 
include a statement certifying that each cement and solvent, as 
purchased, that was used at the affected source during the reporting 
period met the HAP constituent limits (option 1) in Table 1 to this 
subpart.
    (9) For each tire cord production affected source, the emission 
limit option in Sec. 63.5986 and the compliance alternative in 
Sec. 63.5987 that you have chosen to meet.
    (10) For each puncture sealant application affected source, the 
emission limit option in Sec. 63.5988 and the compliance alternative in 
Sec. 63.5989 that you have chosen to meet.
    (d) For each deviation from an emission limitation (emission limit 
or operating limit) that occurs at an affected source where you are not 
using a CPMS to comply with the emission limitations in this subpart, 
the compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs (c)(1) 
through (4) and paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section. This 
includes periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction when the 
affected source is operating.
    (1) The total operating time of each affected source during the 
reporting period.
    (2) Information on the number, duration, and cause of deviations 
(including unknown cause, if applicable) and the corrective action 
taken.
    (e) Each affected source that has obtained a title V operating 
permit pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71 must report all 
deviations as defined in this subpart in the semiannual monitoring 
report required by 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR 
71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A). If an affected source submits a compliance report 
(pursuant to Table 10 to this subpart along with, or as part of, the 
semiannual monitoring report required by 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 
40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) which includes all required information 
concerning deviations from any emission limitation (including any 
operating limit) or work practice requirement in this subpart, 
submission of the compliance report shall be deemed to satisfy any 
obligation to report the same deviations in the semiannual monitoring 
report. However, submission of a compliance report shall not otherwise 
affect any obligation the affected source may have to report deviations 
from permit requirements to the permit authority.

[[Page 45611]]

    (f) Upon notification to the Administrator that a tire production 
affected source has eliminated or reformulated cement and solvent so 
that the source can demonstrate compliance using the purchase 
alternative in Sec. 63.5985(a), future compliance reports for this 
affected source may be submitted annually.
    (g) If acceptable to both the Administrator and you, you may submit 
reports and notifications electronically.


Sec. 63.6011  What records must I keep?

    (a) You must keep the records specified in paragraphs (a)(1) 
through (3) of this section.
    (1) A copy of each notification and report that you submitted to 
comply with this subpart, including all documentation supporting any 
Initial Notification or Notification of Compliance Status that you 
submitted, according to the requirements in Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(xiv).
    (2) Records of performance tests as required in 
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(viii).
    (3) The records in Sec. 63.6(e)(3)(iii) through (v) related to 
startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
    (b) For each tire production affected source, you must keep the 
records specified in Table 9 to this subpart to show continuous 
compliance with each emission limit that applies to you.
    (c) For each tire cord production affected source, you must keep 
the records specified in Table 11 to this subpart to show continuous 
compliance with each emission limit that applies to you.
    (d) For each puncture sealant application affected source, you must 
keep the records specified in Table 13 to this subpart to show 
continuous compliance with each emission limit that applies to you.


Sec. 63.6012  In what form and how long must I keep my records?

    (a) Your records must be in a form suitable and readily available 
for expeditious review, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1).
    (b) As specified in Sec. 63.10(b)(1), you must keep each record for 
5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, 
maintenance, corrective action, report, or record.
    (c) You must keep each record on site for at least 2 years after 
the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective 
action, report, or record, according to Sec. 63.10(b)(1). You can keep 
the records offsite for the remaining 3 years.

Other Requirements and Information


Sec. 63.6013  What parts of the General Provisions apply to me?

    Table 17 to this subpart shows which parts of the General 
Provisions in Secs. 63.1 through 63.15 apply to you.


Sec. 63.6014  Who implements and enforces this subpart?

    (a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by us, the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency, or a delegated authority such 
as your State, local, or tribal agency. If the U.S. EPA has delegated 
authority to your State, local, or tribal agency, then that agency, in 
addition to the U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce 
this subpart. You should contact your U.S. EPA Regional Office to find 
out if implementation and enforcement of this subpart is delegated to 
your State, local, or tribal agency.
    (b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this 
subpart to a State, local, or tribal agency under 40 CFR part 63, 
subpart E, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section 
are retained by the Administrator of the U.S. EPA and are not 
transferred to the State, local, or tribal agency.
    (c) The authorities that cannot be delegated to State, local, or 
tribal agencies are listed in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this 
section.
    (1) Approval of alternatives to the requirements in Secs. 63.5981 
through 63.5984, 63.5986, and 63.5988.
    (2) Approval of major changes to test methods under 
Sec. 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.
    (3) Approval of major changes to monitoring under Sec. 63.8(f) and 
as defined in Sec. 63.90.
    (4) Approval of major changes to recordkeeping and reporting under 
Sec. 63.10(f) and as defined in Sec. 63.90.


Sec. 63.6015  What definitions apply to this subpart?

    Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act and in 
Sec. 63.2, the General Provisions. The following are additional 
definitions of terms used in this subpart:
    As purchased means the condition of a cement and solvent as 
delivered to the facility, prior to any mixing, blending, or dilution.
    Capture system means a hood, enclosed room, or other means of 
collecting organic HAP emissions into a closed-vent system that conveys 
these emissions to a control device.
    Cements and solvents means the collection of all organic chemicals, 
mixtures of chemicals, and compounds used in the production of rubber 
tires, including cements, solvents, and mixtures used as process aids. 
Cements and solvents include, but are not limited to, tread end 
cements, undertread cements, bead cements, tire building cements and 
solvents, green tire spray, blemish repair paints, side wall protective 
paints, marking inks, materials used to process equipment, and slab dip 
mixtures. Cements and solvents do not include coatings or process aids 
used in tire cord production, puncture sealant application, rubber 
processing, or materials used to construct, repair, or maintain process 
equipment, or chemicals and compounds that are not used in the tire 
production process such as materials used in routine janitorial or 
facility grounds maintenance, office supplies (e.g., dry-erase markers, 
correction fluid), architectural paint, or any substance to the extent 
it is used for personal, family, or household purposes, or is present 
in the same form and concentration as a product packaged for 
distribution to and use by the general public.
    Coating means a compound or mixture of compounds that is applied to 
a fabric substrate in the tire cord production operation that allows 
the fabric to be prepared (e.g., by heating, setting, curing) for 
incorporation into a rubber tire.
    Components of rubber tires means any piece or part used in the 
manufacture of rubber tires that becomes an integral portion of the 
rubber tire when manufacture is complete and includes mixed rubber 
compounds, sidewalls, tread, tire beads, and liners. Other components 
often associated with rubber tires such as wheels, valve stems, tire 
bladders and inner tubes are not considered components of rubber tires 
for the purposes of these standards. Tire cord and puncture sealant, 
although components of rubber tires, are considered as separate 
affected sources in these standards and are defined separately.
    Control device means a combustion device, recovery device, 
recapture device, or any combination of these devices used for 
recovering or oxidizing organic hazardous air pollutant vapors. Such 
equipment includes, but is not limited to, absorbers, carbon adsorbers, 
condensers, incinerators (oxidizers), flares, boilers, and process 
heaters.
    Control system efficiency means the percent of total volatile 
organic compound emissions, as measured by EPA Method 25 or 25A (40 CFR 
part 60, appendix A), recovered or destroyed by a control device 
multiplied by the percent of total volatile organic compound emissions, 
as measured by

[[Page 45612]]

Method 25 or 25A, that are captured and conveyed to the control device.
    Deviation means any instance in which an affected source, subject 
to this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
    (1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this 
subpart including, but not limited to, any emission limitation 
(including any operating limit) or work practice standard;
    (2) Fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to 
implement an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is 
included in the operating permit for any affected source required to 
obtain such a permit; or
    (3) Fails to meet any emission limitation (including any operating 
limit) or work practice standard in this subpart during startup, 
shutdown, or malfunction, regardless of whether or not such failure is 
permitted by this subpart.
    Emission limitation means any emission limit, opacity limit, 
operating limit, or visible emission limit.
    Fabric processed means the amount of fabric coated and finished for 
use in subsequent product manufacturing.
    Mixed rubber compound means the material, commonly referred to as 
rubber, from which rubber tires and components of rubber tires are 
manufactured. For the purposes of this definition, mixed rubber 
compound refers to the compound that leaves the rubber mixing process 
(e.g., banburys) and is then processed into components from which 
rubber tires are manufactured.
    Monthly operating period means the period in the Notification of 
Compliance Status report comprised of the number of operating days in 
the month.
    Operating day means the period defined in the Notification of 
Compliance Status report. It may be from midnight to midnight or a 
portion of a 24-hour period.
    Process aid means a solvent, mixture, or cement used to facilitate 
or assist in tire component identification; component storage; tire 
building; tire curing; and tire repair, finishing, and identification.
    Puncture sealant means a mixture that may include, but is not 
limited to, solvent constituents, mixed rubber compound, and process 
oil that is applied to the inner liner of a finished tire for the 
purpose of sealing any future hole which might occur in the tread when 
an object penetrates the tire.
    Responsible official means responsible official as defined in 40 
CFR 70.2.
    Rubber means the sum of the materials (for example, natural rubber, 
synthetic rubber, carbon black, oils, sulfur) that are combined in 
specific formulations for the sole purpose of making rubber tires or 
components of rubber tires.
    Rubber mixing means the physical process of combining materials for 
use in rubber tire manufacturing to make mixed rubber compound using 
the collection of banburys and associated drop mills.
    Rubber tire means a continuous solid or pneumatic cushion typically 
encircling a wheel and usually consisting, when pneumatic, of an 
external rubber covering.
    Rubber used means the total mass of mixed rubber compound delivered 
to the tire production operations in a tire manufacturing facility 
(e.g., the collection of warm-up mills, extruders, calendars, tire 
building, or other tire component and tire manufacturing equipment).
    Tire cord means any fabric (e.g., polyester, cotton) that is 
treated with a coating mixture that allows the fabric to more readily 
accept impregnation with rubber to become an integral part of a rubber 
tire.

Tables to Subpart XXXX of Part 63

    As stated in Sec. 63.5984, you must comply with the emission 
limits for each new, reconstructed, or existing tire production 
affected source in the following table:

Table 1 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Emission Limits for Tire Production
                            Affected Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  You must meet the following emission
        For each . . .                          limits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1--HAP constituent   a. Emissions of each HAP in Table 16 to
 option.                        this subpart must not exceed 1,000 grams
                                HAP per megagram (2 pounds per ton) of
                                total cements and solvents used at the
                                tire production affected source, and b.
                                Emissions of each HAP not in Table 16 to
                                this subpart must not exceed 10,000
                                grams HAP per megagram (20 pounds per
                                ton) of total cements and solvents used
                                at the tire production affected source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Option 2--production-based  Emissions of HAP must not exceed 0.024
 option.                        grams per megagram (0.00005 pounds per
                                ton) of rubber used at the tire
                                production affected source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.5986, you must comply with the emission 
limits for tire cord production affected sources in the following 
table:

   Table 2 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Emission Limits for Tire Cord
                       Production Affected Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  You must meet the following emission
        For each . . .                          limits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1.a (production-     Emissions must not exceed 280 grams HAP
 based option)--Existing tire   per megagram (0.56 pounds per ton) of
 cord production affected       fabric processed at the tire cord
 source.                        production affected source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Option 1.b (production-     Emissions must not exceed 220 grams HAP
 based option)--New or          per megagram (0.43 pounds per ton) of
 reconstructed tire cord        fabric processed at the tire cord
 production affected source.    production affected source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Option 2 (HAP constituent   a. Emissions of each HAP in Table 16 to
 option)--Existing, new or      this subpart must not exceed 1,000 grams
 reconstructed tire cord        HAP per megagram (2 pounds per ton) of
 production affected source.    total coatings used at the tire cord
                                production affected source, and
                               b. Emissions of each HAP not in Table 16
                                to this subpart must not exceed 10,000
                                grams HAP per megagram (20 pounds per
                                ton) of total coatings used at the tire
                                cord production affected source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 45613]]

    As stated in Sec. 63.5988(a), you must comply with the emission 
limits for puncture sealant application affected sources in the 
following table:

    Table 3 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Emission Limits for Puncture
                  Sealant Application Affected Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  You must meet the following emission
        For each . . .                           limit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Option 1.a (percent         Reduce spray booth HAP (measured as
 reduction option)--Existing    volatile organic compounds (VOC))
 puncture sealant application   emissions by at least 86 percent by
 spray booth.                   weight.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Option 1.b (percent         Reduce spray booth HAP (measured as VOC)
 reduction option)--New or      emissions by at least 95 percent by
 reconstructed puncture         weight.
 sealant application spray
 booth.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Option 2 (HAP constituent   a. Emissions of each HAP in Table 16 to
 option) Existing, new or       this subpart must not exceed 1,000 grams
 reconstructed puncture         HAP per megagram (2 pounds per ton) of
 sealant application spray      total puncture sealants used at the
 booth.                         puncture sealant affected source, and
                               b. Emissions of each HAP not in Table 16
                                to this subpart must not exceed 10,000
                                grams HAP per megagram (20 pounds per
                                ton) of total puncture sealants used at
                                the puncture sealant affected source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.5988(b), you must comply with the operating 
limits for puncture sealant application affected sources in the 
following table unless you are meeting Option 2 (HAP constituent 
option) limits in Table 3 to this subpart:

   Table 4 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Operating Limits for Puncture
                   Sealant Application Control Devices
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        For each . . .                       You must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Thermal oxidizer to which   Maintain the daily average firebox
 puncture sealant application   secondary chamber temperature within the
 spray booth emissions are      operating range established during the
 ducted.                        performance test.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Carbon adsorber             a. Maintain the total regeneration mass,
 (regenerative) to which        volumetric flow, and carbon bed
 puncture sealant application   temperature at the operating range
 spray booth emissions are      established during the performance test.
 ducted.                       b. Reestablish the carbon bed temperature
                                to the levels established during the
                                performance test within 15 minutes of
                                each cooling cycle.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Other type of control       Maintain your operating parameter(s)
 device to which puncture       within the range(s) established during
 sealant application spray      the performance test and according to
 booth emissions are ducted.    your monitoring plan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Permanent total enclosure   a. Maintain the face velocity across any
 capture system.                NDO at least at the levels established
                                during the performance test.
                               b. Maintain the size of NDO, the number
                                of NDO, and their proximity to HAP
                                emission sources consistent with the
                                parameters established during the
                                performance test.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Other capture system......  Maintain the operating parameters within
                                the range(s) established during the
                                performance test and according to your
                                monitoring plan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.5993, you must comply with the requirements 
for performance tests in the following table:

                     Table 5 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Requirements for Performance Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       According to the following requirements .
    If you are using . . .        You must . . .      Using . . .                         . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. A thermal oxidizer.........  a. Measure total   i. Method 25 or    (1). Measure total HAP emissions and
                                 HAP emissions,     25A performance    determine the destruction efficiency of
                                 determine          test and data      the control device using Method 25 (40
                                 destruction        from the           CFR part 60, appendix A). You may use
                                 efficiency of      temperature        Method 25A (40 CFR part 60, appendix A)
                                 the control        monitoring         if: an exhaust gas volatile organic
                                 device, and        system.            matter concentration of 50 parts per
                                 establish a site-                     million (ppmv) or less is required to
                                 specific firebox                      comply with the standard; the volatile
                                 secondary                             organic matter concentration at the inlet
                                 chamber                               to the control system and the required
                                 temperature                           level of control are such that exhaust
                                 limit at which                        volatile organic matter concentrations
                                 the emission                          are 50 ppmv or less; or because of the
                                 limit that                            high efficiency of the control device
                                 applies to the                        exhaust, is 50 ppmv or less, regardless
                                 affected source                       of the inlet concentration.
                                 is achieved.                         (2). Collect firebox secondary chamber
                                                                       temperature data every 15 minutes during
                                                                       the entire period of the initial 3-hour
                                                                       performance test, and determine the
                                                                       average firebox temperature over the 3-
                                                                       hour performance test by computing the
                                                                       average of all of the 15-minute reading.

[[Page 45614]]

 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. A carbon adsorber            a. Measure total   i. Method 25 or    (1). Measure total HAP emissions using
 (regenerative).                 organic HAP        Method 25A         Method 25. You may use Method 25A, if an
                                 emissions,         performance test   exhaust gas volatile organic matter
                                 establish the      and data from      concentration of 50 ppmv or less; or
                                 total              the carbon bed     because of the high efficiency of the
                                 regeneration       temperature        control device, exhaust is 50 ppmv or
                                 mass or            monitoring         less is required to comply with the
                                 volumetric flow,   device.            standard; the volatile organic matter
                                 and establish                         concentration (VOMC) at the inlet to the
                                 the temperature                       control system and the required level of
                                 of the carbon                         control are such that exhaust VOMCs are
                                 bed within 15                         50 ppmv or less; or because of the high
                                 minutes of                            efficiency of the control device, exhaust
                                 completing any                        is 50 ppmv or less, regardless of the
                                 cooling cycles.                       inlet concentration.
                                 The total                            (2). Collect carbon bed total regeneration
                                 regeneration                          mass or volumetric flow for each carbon
                                 mass, volumetric                      bed regeneration cycle during the
                                 flow, and carbon                      performance test.
                                 bed temperature                      (3). Record the maximum carbon bed
                                 must be those at                      temperature data for each carbon bed
                                 which the                             regeneration cycle during the performance
                                 emission limit                        test.
                                 that applies to                      (4). Record the carbon bed temperature
                                 the affected                          within 15 minutes of each cooling cycle
                                 source is                             during the performance test.
                                 achieved.                            (5). Determine the average total
                                                                       regeneration mass or the volumetric flow
                                                                       over the 3-hour performance test by
                                                                       computing the average of all of the
                                                                       readings.
                                                                      (6). Determine the average maximum carbon
                                                                       bed temperature over the 3-hour
                                                                       performance test by computing the average
                                                                       of all of the readings.
                                                                      (7). Determine the average carbon bed
                                                                       temperature within 15 minutes of the
                                                                       cooling cycle over the 3-hour performance
                                                                       test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Any control device other     Determine control  EPA-approved       Conduct the performance test according to
 than a thermal oxidizer or      device             methods and data   the site-specific plan submitted
 carbon adsorber.                efficiency and     from the           according to Sec.  63.7(c)(2)(i).
                                 establish          continuous
                                 operating          parameter
                                 parameter limits   monitoring
                                 with which you     system.
                                 will demonstrate
                                 continuous
                                 compliance with
                                 the emission
                                 limit that
                                 applies to the
                                 affected source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. All control devices........  a. Select          Method 1 or 1A of  Locate sampling sites at the inlet and
                                 sampling ports'    40 CFR part 60,    outlet of the control device and prior to
                                 location and the   appendix A.        any releases to the atmosphere.
                                 number of
                                 traverse ports.
                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                b. Determine       Method 2, 2A, 2C,
                                 velocity and       2D, 2F, or 2G of
                                 volumetric flow    40 CFR part 60,
                                 rate.              appendix A.
                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                c. Conduct gas     Method 3, 3A, or
                                 analysis.          3B of 40 CFR
                                                    part 60 appendix
                                                    A.
                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                d. Measure         Method 4 of 40
                                 moisture content   CFR part 60,
                                 of the stack gas.  appendix A.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. A permenent total enclosure  Measure the face   Method 204 of CFR  Capture efficiency is assumed to be 100
 (PTE).                          velocity across    part 51,           percent if the criteria are met
                                 natural draft      appendix M.
                                 openings and
                                 document the
                                 design features
                                 of the enclosure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Temporary total enclosure    Construct a        Method 204 and
 (TTE).                          temporarily        the appropriate
                                 installed          combination of
                                 enclosure that     Methods 204A-
                                 allows you to      204F of 40 CFR
                                 determine the      part 51,
                                 efficiency of      appendix M.
                                 your capture
                                 system and
                                 establish
                                 operating
                                 parameter limits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.5996, you must show initial compliance with 
the emission limits for tire production affected sources according 
to the following table:

[[Page 45615]]



  Table 6 to Subpart XXXX of Part 62.--Initial Compliance With the Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected
                                                     Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  For the following emission limit   You have demonstrated initial compliance if
            For . . .                           . . .                                   . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     You demonstrate for each monthly period that
 purchase compliance alternative   Table 1 to this subpart, option   no cements and solvents were purchased and
 in Sec.  63.5985(a).              1.                                used at the affected source containing HAP
                                                                     in amounts above the composition limits in
                                                                     Table 1 to this subpart, option 1,
                                                                     determined according to the procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(a) and (b)(1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative without using a       1.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 control device in Sec.                                              1 to this subpart, option 1, determined
 63.5985(b).                                                         according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(a) and (b)(2).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative using a control       1.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 device in Sec.  63.5985(c).                                         1 to this subpart, option 1, determined
                                                                     according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(a), (b)(3) and (4), and (d)
                                                                     through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Sources complying with the     The production-based option in    You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative without use of a      2.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 control device in Sec.                                              1 to this subpart, option 2, determined
 63.5985(b).                                                         according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(c)(1) through (3).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Sources complying with the     The production-based option in    You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative using a control       2.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 device in Sec.  63.5985(c).                                         1 to this subpart, option 2, determined
                                                                     according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(c)(1) and (2), (4) and (5),
                                                                     and (d) through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    As stated in Sec. 63.5999, you must show initial compliance with 
the emission limits for tire cord production affected sources 
according to the following table:

    Table 7 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Initial Compliance With the Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production
                                                Affected Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  For the following emission limit   You have demonstrated initial compliance if
            For . . .                           . . .                                   . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with the     The production-based option in    You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average alternative       Table 2 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 without using an add-on control   1.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 device according to Sec.                                            2 to this subpart, option 1, determined
 63.5987(a).                                                         according to the procedures in Sec.
                                                                     63.5997(a), (b)(1) and (2).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sources complying with the     The production-based option in    You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average alternative       Table 2 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 using an add-on control device    1.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 according to Sec.  63.5987(b).                                      2 to this subpart, option 1, determined
                                                                     according to the procedures in Sec.
                                                                     63.5997(a), (b)(1) and (3) through (4), and
                                                                     (d) through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average alternative       Table 2 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 without using an add-on control   2.                                do not exceed the HAP constituent emission
 device according to Sec.                                            limits in Table 2 to this subpart, option
 63.5987(a).                                                         2, determined according to the applicable
                                                                     procedures in Sec.  63.5997(a) and (c)(1)
                                                                     and (2).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average alternative       Table 2 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 using an add-on control device    2.                                do not exceed the HAP constituent emission
 according to Sec.  63.5987(b).                                      limits in Table 2 to this subpart, option
                                                                     2, determined according to the applicable
                                                                     procedures in Sec.  63.5997(c)(1) and (3)
                                                                     through (4), and (d) through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6002, you must show initial compliance with 
the emission limits for puncture sealant application affected 
sources according to the following table:

[[Page 45616]]



                    Table 8 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Initial Compliance With the Emission
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  For the following emission limit   You have demonstrated initial compliance if
            For . . .                           . . .                                   . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with the     The percent reduction option in   You demonstrate that you conducted the
 overall control efficiency        Table 3 to this subpart, option   performance tests, determined the overall
 alternative in Sec.  63.5989(a).  1.                                efficiency of your control system,
                                                                     demonstrated that the applicable limits in
                                                                     Table 3 to this subpart, option 1, have
                                                                     been achieved, and established the
                                                                     operating limits in Table 4 of this subpart
                                                                     for your equipment according to the
                                                                     applicable procedures in Sec.  63.6000(b).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sources complying with the     The percent reduction option in   You demonstrate that you conducted the
 permanent total enclosure and     Table 3 to this subpart, option   performance tests, determined the
 control device efficiency         1.                                individual efficiencies of your capture and
 alternative in Sec.  63.5989(b).                                    control systems, demonstrated that the
                                                                     applicable limits in Table 3 to this
                                                                     subpart, option 1, have been achieved, and
                                                                     established the operating limits in Table 4
                                                                     of this subpart for your equipment
                                                                     according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.6000(b).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average alternative in    Table 3 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 Sec.  63.5989(c) without using    2.                                do not exceed the HAP constituent emission
 an add-on control device.                                           limits in Table 3 to this subpart, option
                                                                     2, determined according to the applicable
                                                                     procedures in Sec.  63.6000(c) and (d)(1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     You demonstrate that the monthly average HAP
 HAP constituent alternative in    Table 3 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 Sec.  63.5989(d) by using an      2.                                do not exceed the HAP constituent emission
 add-on control device.                                              limits in Table 3 to this subpart, option
                                                                     2, determined according to the applicable
                                                                     procedures in Sec.  63.6000(c), (d)(2) and
                                                                     (3), and (e) through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6003, you must maintain minimum data to 
show continuous compliance with the emission limits for tire 
production affected sources according to the following table:

    Table 9 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Minimum Data for Continuous
Compliance With the Emission Limits for Tire Production Affected Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          For . . .                     You must maintain . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with      a. A list of each cement and solvent as
 purchase compliance            purchased and the manufacturer or
 alternative in Sec.            supplier of each.
 63.5985(a) that are meeting   b. A record of Method 311 (40 CFR part
 the HAP constituent emission   60, appendix A), or approved alternative
 limit (option 1) in Table 1    method, test results indicating the mass
 to this subpart.               percent of each HAP for each cement and
                                solvent as purchased.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sources complying with the  a. A record of Method 311, or approved
 monthly average compliance     alternative method, test results,
 alternative without using a    indicating the mass percent of each HAP
 control device according to    for each cement and solvent, as
 Sec.  63.5985(b) that are      purchased.
 meeting emission limits in    b. The mass of each cement and solvent
 Table 1 to this subpart.       used each monthly operating period.
                               c. The total mass of rubber used each
                                monthly operating period (if complying
                                with the production-based emission
                                limit, option 2, in Table 1 to this
                                subpart).
                               d. All data and calculations used to
                                determine the monthly average mass
                                percent for each HAP for each monthly
                                operating period.
                               e. Monthly averages of emissions in the
                                appropriate emission limit format.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Sources complying with the  a. The same information as sources
 monthly average compliance     complying with the monthly average
 alternative using a control    alternative without using a control
 device according to Sec.       device.
 63.5985(c) that are meeting   b. Records of operating parameter values
 emission limits in Table 1     for each operating parameter that
 to this subpart.               applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6004, you must show continuous compliance 
with the emission limits for tire production affected sources 
according to the following table:

    Table 10 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Continuous Compliance With the Emission Limits for Tire Production
                                                Affected Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  For the following emission limit   You must demonstrate continuous compliance
            For . . .                           . . .                                 by . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with         The HAP constituent option in     Demonstrating for each monthly period that
 purchase compliance alternative   Table 1 to this subpart, option   no cements and solvents were purchased and
 in Sec.  63.5985(a).              1.                                used at the affected source containing HAP
                                                                     in amounts above the composition limits in
                                                                     Table 1 to this subpart, option 1,
                                                                     determined according to the procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(a) and (b)(1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45617]]

 
2. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     Demonstrating that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative without using a       1.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 control device according to                                         1 to this subpart, option 1, determined
 Sec.  63.5985(b).                                                   according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(a) and (b)(2).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Sources complying with the     The HAP constituent option in     Demonstrating that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative using a control       1.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 device according to Sec.                                            1 to this subpart, option 1, determined
 63.5985(c).                                                         according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(a), (b)(3) and (4), and (d)
                                                                     through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Sources complying with the     The production-based option in    Demonstrating that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative without using a       2.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 control device according to                                         1 to this subpart, option 2, determined
 Sec.  63.5985(b).                                                   according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(c)(1) through (3).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Sources complying with the     The production-based option in    Demonstrating that the monthly average HAP
 monthly average compliance        Table 1 to this subpart, option   emissions for each monthly operating period
 alternative using a control       2.                                do not exceed the emission limits in Table
 device according to Sec.                                            1 to this subpart, option 2, determined
 63.5985(c).                                                         according to the applicable procedures in
                                                                     Sec.  63.5994(c)(1) and (2), (4) and (5),
                                                                     and (d) through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6005, you must maintain minimum data to 
show continuous compliance with the emission limits for tire cord 
production affected sources according to the following table:

    Table 11 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Minimum Data for Continuous
  Compliance With the Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production Affected
                                 Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          For . . .                     You must maintain . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with the  a. A record of Method 311 (40 CFR part
 monthly average alternative    63, appendix A), or approved alternative
 without using an add-on        method, test results, indicating the
 control device according to    mass percent of each HAP for coating
 Sec.  63.5987(a) that are      used.
 meeting emission limits in    b. The mass of each coating used each
 Table 2 to this subpart.       monthly operating period.
                               c. The total mass of fabric processed
                                each monthly operating period (if
                                complying with the production-based
                                option in Table 2 to this subpart,
                                option 1).
                               d. All data and calculations used to
                                determine the monthly average mass
                                percent for each HAP for each monthly
                                operating period.
                               e. Monthly averages of emissions in the
                                appropriate emission emission limit
                                format.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sources complying with the  a. The same information as sources
 monthly average alternative    complying with the monthly average
 using an add-on control        alternative without using a control
 device according to Sec.       device.
 63.5987(b) that are meeting   b. Records of operating parameter values
 emission limits in Table 2     for each operating parameter that
 to this subpart.               applies to you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6006, you must show continuous compliance 
with the emission limits for tire cord production affected sources 
according to the following table:

  Table 12 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Continuous Compliance With the Emission Limits for Tire Cord Production
                                                Affected Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  For the following emission limit   You must demonstrate continuous compliance
            For . . .                           . . .                                 by . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with the     In Table 2 to this subpart......  a. Demonstrating that the monthly average
 monthly average compliance                                          HAP emissions for each monthly operating
 alternative without using an                                        period do not exceed the emission limits in
 add-on control device according                                     Table 2 to this subpart, option 1,
 to Sec.  63.5987(a).                                                determined according to the applicable
                                                                     procedures in Sec.  63.5997(a) and (b)(1)
                                                                     and (2).
                                                                    b. Demonstrating that the monthly average
                                                                     HAP emissions for each monthly operating
                                                                     period do not exceed the HAP constituent
                                                                     emission limits in Table 2 to this subpart,
                                                                     option 2, determined according to the
                                                                     applicable procedures in Sec.  63.5997(a)
                                                                     and (c)(1) and (2).

[[Page 45618]]

 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sources complying with the     In Table 2 to this subpart......  a. Demonstrating that the monthly average
 monthly average compliance                                          HAP emissions for each monthly operating
 alternative using an add-on                                         period do not exceed the emission limits in
 control device according to                                         Table 2 to this subpart, option 1,
 Sec.  63.5987(b).                                                   determined according to the applicable
                                                                     procedures in Sec.  63.5997(a), (b)(1) and
                                                                     (3) through (4), and (d) through (f).
                                                                    b. Demonstrating that the monthly HAP
                                                                     emissions for each monthly operating period
                                                                     do not exceed the HAP constituent emission
                                                                     limits in Table 2 to this subpart, option
                                                                     2, determined according to the applicable
                                                                     procedures in Sec.  63.5997(c)(1) and (3)
                                                                     through (4), and (d) through (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6007, you must maintain minimum data to 
show continuous compliance with the emission limitations for 
puncture sealant application affected sources according to the 
following table:

    Table 13 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Minimum Data for Continuous
      Compliance With the Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant
                      Application Affected Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          For . . .                     You must maintain . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sources complying with the  Records of the secondary chamber firebox
 control efficiency             temperature for 100 percent of the hours
 alternatives in Sec.           during which the process was operated.
 63.5989(a) or (b) that are
 meeting the percent
 reduction emission limits in
 Table 3 to this subpart,
 option 1, using a thermal
 oxidizer to reduce HAP
 emissions so that they do
 not exceed the operating
 limits in Table 4 to this
 subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Sources complying with the  Records of the total regeneration stream
 control efficiency             mass or volumetric flow for each
 alternatives in Sec.           regeneration cycle for 100 percent of
 63.5989(a) or (b) that are     the hours during which the process was
 meeting the percent            operated, and a record of the carbon bed
 reduction emission limits in   temperature after each regeneration, and
 Table 3 to this subpart,       within 15 minutes of completing any
 option 1, using a carbon       cooling cycle for 100 percent of the
 adsorber to reduce HAP         hours during which the process was
 emissions so that they do      operated.
 not exceed the operating
 limits in Table 4 to this
 subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Sources complying with the  Records of operating parameter values for
 control efficiency             each operating parameter that applies to
 alternatives in Sec.           you.
 63.5989(a) or (b) that are
 meeting the percent
 reduction emission limits in
 Table 3 to this subpart,
 option 1, using any other
 type of control device to
 which puncture sealant
 application spray booth HAP
 emissions are ducted so that
 they do not exceed the
 operating limits in Table 4
 to this subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Sources complying with the  Records of the face velocity across any
 permanent total enclosure      NDO, the size of NDO, the number of NDO,
 compliance alternative in      and their proximity to HAP emission
 Sec.  63.5989(b) that are      sources.
 meeting the percent
 reduction emission limits in
 Table 3 to this subpart,
 option 1, using a permanent
 total enclosure capture
 system to capture HAP
 emissions so that they do
 not exceed the operating
 limits in Table 4 to this
 subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Sources complying with the  Records of operating parameter values for
 overall control efficiency     each operating parameter that applies to
 alternative in Sec.            you.
 63.5989(a) that are meeting
 the percent reduction
 emission limits in Table 3
 to this subpart, option 1,
 using any other capture
 system to capture HAP
 emissions so that they do
 not exceed the operating
 limits in Table 4 to this
 subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Sources complying with the  a. A record of Method 311 (40 CFR part
 monthly average alternative    63, appendix A), or approved alternative
 without using an add-on        method, test results, indicating the
 control device according to    mass percent of each HAP for puncture
 Sec.  63.5988(a) that are      sealant used.
 meeting the HAP constituent   b. The mass of each puncture sealant used
 emission limits in Table 3     each monthly operating period.
 to this subpart, option 2.    c. All data and calculations used to
                                determine the monthly average mass
                                percent for each HAP for each monthly
                                operating period.
                               d. Monthly averages of emissions in the
                                appropriate emission limit format.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45619]]

 
7. Sources complying with the  a. The same information as sources
 monthly average alternative    complying with the monthly average
 using an add-on control        alternative that are not using a control
 device according to Sec.       device.
 63.5988(a) that are meeting   b. Records of operating parameter values
 the HAP constituent emission   for each operating parameter that
 limits in Table 3 to this      applies to you.
 subpart, option 2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6008, you must show continuous compliance 
with the emission limitations for puncture sealant application 
affected sources according to the following table:

  Table 14 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Continuous Compliance With the
 Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant Application Affected Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    You must demonstrate continuous
          For . . .                       compliance by . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each carbon adsorber used   a. Monitoring and recording every 15
 to comply with the operating   minutes the total regeneration stream
 limits in Table 4 to this      mass or volumetric flow, and the carbon
 subpart.                       bed temperature after each regeneration,
                                and within 15 minutes of completing any
                                cooling cycle, and
                               b. Maintaining the total regeneration
                                stream mass or volumetric flow, and the
                                carbon bed temperature after each
                                regeneration, and within 15 minutes of
                                completing any cooling cycle within the
                                operating levels established during your
                                performance test.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Each thermal oxidizer used  a. Continuously monitoring and recording
 to comply with operating       the firebox temperature every 15
 limits in Table 4 to this      minutes, and
 subpart.                      b. Maintaining the daily average firebox
                                temperature within the operating level
                                established during your performance
                                test.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Other ``add-on'' control    Continuously monitoring and recording
 or capture system hardware     specified parameters identified through
 used to comply with the        compliance testing and identified in the
 operating limits in Table 4    Notification of Compliance Status
 to this subpart.               report.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Sources complying with the  Demonstrating that the monthly average
 monthly average compliance     HAP emissions for each monthly operating
 alternative without using an   period do not exceed the HAP constituent
 add-on control device          emission limits in Table 3 to this
 according to Sec.              subpart, option 2, determined according
 63.5989(c) that are meeting    to the applicable procedures in Sec.
 the HAP constituent emission   63.6000(c) and (d)(1).
 limits in Table 3 to this
 subpart, option 2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Sources complying with the  Demonstrating that the monthly average
 monthly average compliance     HAP emissions for each monthly operating
 alternative by using an add-   period do not exceed the HAP constituent
 on control device according    emission limits in Table 3 to this
 to Sec.  63.5989(d) that are   subpart, option 2, determined according
 the HAP constituent emission   to the applicable procedures in Sec.
 limits in Table 3 to this      63.6000(c), (d)(2) and (3), and (e)
 subpart, option 2.             through (g).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6010, you must submit each report that 
applies to you according to the following table:

                         Table 15 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Requirements for Reports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      You must submit the report
        You must submit a(n)                  The report must contain . . .                      . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Compliance report...............  a. If there are no deviations from any emission  Semiannually according to
                                      limitations that apply to you, a statement       the requirements in Sec.
                                      that there were no deviations from the           63.6010(b), unless you
                                      emission limitations during the reporting        meet the requirements for
                                      period. If there were no periods during which    annual reporting in Sec.
                                      the CPMS was out-of-control as specified in      63.6010(f).
                                      Sec.  63.8(c)(7), a statement that there were
                                      no periods during which the CPMS was out-of-
                                      control during the reporting period.
                                    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     b. If you have a deviation from any emission     Semiannually according to
                                      limitation during the reporting period at an     the requirements in Sec.
                                      affected source where you are not using a        63.6010(b), unless you
                                      CPMS, the report must contain the information    meet the requirements for
                                      in Sec.  63.6010(d). If the deviation occurred   annual reporting in Sec.
                                      at a source where you are using a CMPS or if     63.6010(f).
                                      there were periods during which the CPMS were
                                      out-of-control as specified in Sec.
                                      63.8(c)(7), the report must contain the
                                      information required by Sec.  63.5990(f)(3).
                                    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     c. If you had a startup, shutdown or             Semiannually according to
                                      malfunction during the reporting period and      the requirements in Sec.
                                      you took actions consistent with your startup,   63.6010(b), unless you
                                      shutdown, and malfunction plan, the compliance   meet the requirements for
                                      report must include the information in Sec.      annual reporting in Sec.
                                      63.10(d)(5)(i).                                  63.6010(f).
                                    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45620]]

 
2. Immediate startup, shutdown, and  a. Actions taken for the event.................  By fax or telephone within
 malfunction report if you had a                                                       2 working days after
 startup, shutdown, or malfunction                                                     starting actions
 during the reporting period that                                                      inconsistent with the
 is not consistent with your                                                           plan.
 startup, shutdown, and malfunction
 plan..
                                    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     b. The information in Sec.  63.10(d)(5)(ii)....  By letter within 7 working
                                                                                       days after the end of the
                                                                                       event unless you have
                                                                                       made alternative
                                                                                       arrangements with the
                                                                                       permitting authority
                                                                                       (Sec.  63.10(d)(5)(ii)).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    You must use the information listed in the following table to 
determine which emission limit in the HAP constituent options in 
Tables 1 through 3 to this subpart is applicable to you:

 Table 16 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Selected Hazardous Air Pollutants
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              CAS No.                 Selected hazardous air pollutants
------------------------------------------------------------------------
50000.............................  Formaldehyde
51796.............................  Ethyl carbamate (Urethane)
53963.............................  2-Acetylaminofluorene
56235.............................  Carbon tetrachloride
57147.............................  1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine
57578.............................  beta-Propiolactone
58899.............................  Lindane (all isomers)
59892.............................  N-Nitrosomorpholine
60117.............................  Dimethyl aminoazobenzene
62759.............................  N-Nitrosodimethylamine
64675.............................  Diethyl sulfate
67663.............................  Chloroform
67721.............................  Hexachloroethane
71432.............................  Benzene (including benzene from
                                     gasoline)
75014.............................  Vinyl chloride
75070.............................  Acetaldehyde
75092.............................  Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)
75218.............................  Ethylene oxide
75558.............................  1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl
                                     aziridine)
75569.............................  Propylene oxide
77781.............................  Dimethyl sulfate
79061.............................  Acrylamide
79447.............................  Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride
79469.............................  2-Nitropropane
88062.............................  2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
91941.............................  3,3-Dichlorobenzidene
92671.............................  4-Aminobiphenyl
92875.............................  Benzidine
95534.............................  o-Toluidine
95807.............................  2,4-Toluene diamine
96128.............................  1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
96457.............................  Ethylene thiourea
98077.............................  Benzotrichloride
101144............................  4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloroaniline)
101779............................  4,4-Methylenedianiline
106467............................  1,4-Dichlorobenzene(p)
106898............................  Epichlorohydrin (l-Chloro-2,3-
                                     epoxypropane)
106934............................  Ethylene dibromide (Dibromoethane)
106990............................  1,3-Butadiene
107062............................  Ethylene dichloride (1,2-
                                     Dichloroethane)
107131............................  Acrylonitrile
107302............................  Chloromethyl methyl ether
117817............................  Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
118741............................  Hexachlorobenzene
119904............................  3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine
119937............................  3,3-Dimethyl benzidine
122667............................  1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
123911............................  1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide)
127184............................  Tetrachloroethylene
                                     (Perchloroethylene)
140885............................  Ethyl acrylate
302012............................  Hydrazine
542756............................  1,3-Dichloropropene

[[Page 45621]]

 
542881............................  Bis(chloromethyl)ether
680319............................  Hexamethylphosphoramide
684935............................  N-Nitroso-N-methylurea
1120714...........................  1,3-Propane sultone
1332214...........................  Asbestos
1336363...........................  Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors)
1746016...........................  2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
8001352...........................  Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene)
                                    Arsenic Compounds
                                    Chromium Compounds
                                    Coke Oven Emissions
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in Sec. 63.6013, you must comply with the applicable 
General Provisions (GP) requirements according to the following 
table:

         Table 17 to Subpart XXXX of Part 63.--Applicability of General Provisions to This Subpart XXXX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   Applicable to Subpart XXXX?
                                                     Brief description of      ---------------------------------
           Citation                Subject            applicable sections       Using a control    Not using a
                                                                                     device       control device
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.1...................  Applicability..  Initial applicability           Yes............  Yes.
                                                 determination; applicability
                                                 after standard established;
                                                 permit requirements;
                                                 extensions; notifications.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.2...................  Definitions....  Definitions for part 63         Yes............  Yes.
                                                 standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.3...................  Units and        Units and abbreviations for     Yes............  Yes.
                                Abbreviations.   part 63 standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.4...................  Prohibited       Prohibited activities;          Yes............  Yes.
                                Activities.      compliance date;
                                                 circumvention; severability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.5...................  Construction/    Applicability; applications;    Yes............  Yes.
                                Reconstruction.  approvals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(a)................  Applicability..  GP apply unless compliance      Yes............  Yes.
                                                 extension; GP apply to area
                                                 sources that become major.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(b)(1)-(4).........  Compliance       Standards apply at effective    Yes............  Yes.
                                Dates for New    date; 3 years after effective
                                and              date; upon startup; 10 years
                                Reconstructed    after construction or
                                Sources.         reconstruction commences for
                                                 section 112(f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(b)(5).............  Notification...  Must notify if commenced        Yes............  Yes.
                                                 construction or
                                                 reconstruction after proposal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(b)(6).............  [Reserved]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(b)(7).............  Compliance       ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Dates for New
                                and
                                Reconstructed
                                Area Sources
                                that Become
                                Major.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(c)(1)-(2).........  Compliance       Comply according to date in     Yes............  Yes.
                                Dates for        subpart, which must be no
                                Existing         later than 3 years after
                                Sources.         effective date; for CAA
                                                 section 112(f) standards,
                                                 comply within 90 days of
                                                 effective date unless
                                                 compliance extension.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(c)(3)-(4).........  [Reserved]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(c)(5).............  Compliance       Area sources that become major  Yes............  Yes.
                                Dates for        must comply with major source
                                Existing Area    standards by date indicated
                                Sources that     in subpart or by equivalent
                                Become Major.    time period (for example, 3
                                                 years).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(d)................  [Reserved]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45622]]

 
Sec.  63.6(e)(1)-(2).........  Operation &      Operate to minimize emissions   Yes............  Yes.
                                Maintenance.     at all times; correct
                                                 malfunctions as soon as
                                                 practicable; and operation
                                                 and maintenance requirements
                                                 independently enforceable;
                                                 information Administrator
                                                 will use to determine if
                                                 operation and maintenance
                                                 requirements were met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(e)(3).............  Startup,         ..............................  Yes............  No.
                                Shutdown, and
                                Malfunction
                                Plan (SSMP).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(f)(1).............  Compliance       ..............................  Yes............  No.
                                Except During
                                SSM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(f)(2)-(3).........  Methods for      Compliance based on             Yes............  Yes.
                                Determining      performance test; operation
                                Compliance.      and maintenance plans;
                                                 records; inspection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(g)(1)-(3).........  Alternative      Procedures for getting an       Yes............  Yes.
                                Standard.        alternative standard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(h)................  Opacity/Visible  ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Emission (VE)
                                Standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(i)................  Compliance       Procedures and criteria for     Yes............  Yes.
                                Extension.       Administrator to grant
                                                 compliance extension.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.6(j)................  Presidential     President may exempt source     Yes............  Yes.
                                Compliance       category from requirement to
                                Exemption.       comply with rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(a)(1)-(2).........  Performance      ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Test Dates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(a)(3).............  CAA section 114  Administrator may require a     Yes............  No.
                                Authority.       performance test under CAA
                                                 section 114 at any time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(b)(1).............  Notification of  Must notify Administrator 60    Yes............  No.
                                Performance      days before the test.
                                Test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(b)(2).............  Notification of  If rescheduling a performance   Yes............  No.
                                Rescheduling.    test is necessary, must
                                                 notify Administrator 5 days
                                                 before scheduled date of
                                                 rescheduled date.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(c)................  Quality          Requirement to submit site-     Yes............  No.
                                Assurance/Test   specific test plan 60 days
                                Plan.            before the test or on date
                                                 Administrator agrees with:
                                                 test plan approval
                                                 procedures; performance audit
                                                 requirements; and internal
                                                 and external quality
                                                 assurance procedures for
                                                 testing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(d)................  Testing          Requirements for testing        Yes............  No.
                                Facilities.      facilities.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(e)(1).............  Conditions for   Performance tests must be       Yes............  No.
                                Conducting       conducted under
                                Performance      representative conditions;
                                Tests.           cannot conduct performance
                                                 tests during SSM; not a
                                                 violation to exceed standard
                                                 during SSM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(e)(2).............  Conditions for   Must conduct according to rule  Yes............  No.
                                Conducting       and EPA test methods unless
                                Performance      Administrator approves
                                Tests.           alternative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(e)(3).............  Test Run         Must have three test runs of    Yes............  No.
                                Duration.        at least 1 hour each;
                                                 compliance is based on
                                                 arithmetic mean of three
                                                 runs; and conditions when
                                                 data from an additional test
                                                 run can be used.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(f)................  Alternative      Procedures by which             Yes............  No.
                                Test Method.     Administrator can grant
                                                 approval to use an
                                                 alternative test method.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.7(g)................  Performance      Must include raw data in        Yes............  No.
                                Test Data        performance test report; must
                                Analysis.        submit performance test data
                                                 60 days after end of test
                                                 with the Notification of
                                                 Compliance Status report; and
                                                 keep data for 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45623]]

 
Sec.  63.7(h)................  Waiver of Tests  Procedures for Administrator    Yes............  No.
                                                 to waive performance test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(a)(1).............  Applicability    Subject to all monitoring       Yes............  Yes.
                                of Monitoring    requirements in standard.
                                Requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(a)(2).............  Performance      Performance Specifications in   Yes............  No.
                                Specifications.  appendix B of 40 CFR part 60
                                                 apply.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(a)(3).............  [Reserved]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(a)(4).............  Monitoring with  ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Flares.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(b)(1).............  Monitoring.....  Must conduct monitoring         Yes............  Yes.
                                                 according to standard unless
                                                 Administrator approves
                                                 alternative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(b)(2)-(3).........  Multiple         Specific requirements for       Yes............  Yes.
                                Effluents and    installing monitoring
                                Multiple         systems; must install on each
                                Monitoring       effluent before it is
                                Systems.         combined and before it is
                                                 released to the atmosphere
                                                 unless Administrator approves
                                                 otherwise; if more than one
                                                 monitoring system on an
                                                 emission point, must report
                                                 all monitoring system
                                                 results, unless one
                                                 monitoring system is a backup.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(1).............  Monitoring       Maintain monitoring system in   Applies as       No.
                                System           a manner consistent with good   modified by
                                Operation and    air pollution control           Sec.  63.5990(
                                Maintenance.     practices.                      e) and (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(1)(i)..........  Routine and      ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Predictable
                                SSM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(1)(ii).........  SSM not in SSMP  ..............................  No.............  No.
Sec.  63.8(c)(1)(iii)........  Compliance with  How Administrator determines    Yes............  Yes.
                                Operation and    if source complying with
                                Maintenance      operation and maintenance
                                Requirements.    requirements; review of
                                                 source operation and
                                                 maintenance procedures,
                                                 records, manufacturer's
                                                 instructions,
                                                 recommendations, and
                                                 inspection of monitoring
                                                 system.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(2)-(3).........  Monitoring       Must install to get             Yes............  No.
                                System           representative emission and
                                Installation.    parameter measurements; must
                                                 verify operational status
                                                 before or at performance test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(4).............  Continuous       ..............................  Applies as       No.
                                Monitoring                                       modified by
                                System (CMS)                                     Sec.  63.5990(
                                Requirements.                                    f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(5).............  Continuous       ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Opacity
                                Monitoring
                                Systems (COMS)
                                Minimum
                                Procedures.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(6).............  CMS              ..............................  Applies as       No.
                                Requirements.                                    modified by
                                                                                 Sec.  63.5990(
                                                                                 e).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(c)(7)-(8).........  CMS              Out-of-control periods,         Yes............  No.
                                Requirements.    including reporting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(d)................  CMS Quality      ..............................  Applies as       No.
                                Control.                                         modified by
                                                                                 Sec.  63.5990(
                                                                                 e) and (f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(e)................  CMS Performance  ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Evaluation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(f)(1)-(5).........  Alternative      Procedures for Administrator    Yes............  Yes.
                                Monitoring       to approve alternative
                                Method.          monitoring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45624]]

 
Sec.  63.8(f)(6).............  Alternative to   ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Relative
                                Accuracy Test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.8(g)................  Data Reduction.  ..............................  Applies as       No.
                                                                                 modified by
                                                                                 Sec.  63.5990(
                                                                                 f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(a)................  Notification     Applicability and state         Yes............  Yes.
                                Requirements.    delegation.
Sec.  63.9(b)(1)-(5).........  Initial          Submit notification 120 days    Yes............  Yes.
                                Notifications.   after effective date;
                                                 notification of intent to
                                                 construct/reconstruct,
                                                 notification of commencement
                                                 of construct/reconstruct,
                                                 notification of startup; and
                                                 contents of each.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(c)................  Request for      Can request if cannot comply    Yes............  Yes.
                                Compliance       by date or if installed best
                                Extension.       available control technology
                                                 or lowest achievable emission
                                                 rate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(d)................  Notification of  For sources that commence       Yes............  Yes.
                                Special          construction between proposal
                                Compliance       and promulgation and want to
                                Requirements     comply 3 years after
                                for New Source.  effective date.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(e)................  Notification of  Notify Administrator 60 days    Yes............  No.
                                Performance      prior.
                                Test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(f)................  Notification of  No............................  No.............
                                VE/Opacity
                                Test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(g)................  Additional       No............................  No.............
                                Notifications
                                When Using CMS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(h)................  Notification of  Contents; due 60 days after     Yes............  Yes.
                                Compliance       end of performance test or
                                Status.          other compliance
                                                 demonstration, except for
                                                 opacity/VE, which are due 30
                                                 days after; when to submit to
                                                 Federal vs. State authority.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(i)................  Adjustment of    Procedures for Administrator    Yes............  Yes.
                                Submittal        to approve change in when
                                Deadlines.       notifications must be
                                                 submitted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.9(j)................  Change in        Must submit within 15 days      Yes............  Yes.
                                Previous         after the change.
                                Information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(a)...............  Recordkeeping/   Applies to all, unless          Yes............  Yes.
                                Reporting.       compliance extension; when to
                                                 submit to Federal vs. State
                                                 authority; procedures for
                                                 owners of more than 1 source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(b)(1)............  Recordkeeping/   General Requirements; keep all  Yes............  Yes.
                                Reporting.       records readily available;
                                                 and keep for 5 years..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(b)(2)(i)-(iv)....  Records related  Yes...........................  No.............
                                to Startup,
                                Shutdown, and
                                Malfunction..
Sec.  63.10(b)(2)(vi) and (x)- CMS Records....  Malfunctions, inoperative, out- Yes............  No.
 (xi).                                           of-control; calibration
                                                 checks; adjustments,
                                                 maintenance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(b)(2) (vii)-(ix).  Records........  Measurements to demonstrate     Yes............  Yes.
                                                 compliance with emission
                                                 limitations; performance
                                                 test, performance evaluation,
                                                 and visible emission
                                                 observation results; and
                                                 measurements to determine
                                                 conditions of performance
                                                 tests and performance
                                                 evaluations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(b)(2) (xii)......  Records........  Records when under waiver.....  Yes............  Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(b)(2) (xiii).....  Records........  ..............................  No.............  No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(b)(2) (xiv)......  Records........  All documentation supporting    Yes............  Yes.
                                                 Initial Notification and
                                                 Notification of Compliance
                                                 Status.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(b)(3)............  Records........  Applicability determinations..  Yes............  Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45625]]

 
Sec.  63.10(c)...............  Records........  ..............................  No.............  No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(d)(1)............  General          Requirement to report.........  Yes............  Yes.
                                Reporting
                                Requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(d)(2)............  Report of        When to submit to Federal or    Yes............  No.
                                Performance      State authority.
                                Test Results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(d)(3)............  Reporting        ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Opacity or VE
                                Observations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(d)(4)............  Progress         Must submit progress reports    Yes............  Yes.
                                Reports.         on schedule if under
                                                 compliance extension.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(d)(5)............  Startup,         ..............................  Yes............  No.
                                Shutdown, and
                                Malfunction
                                Reports.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(e)...............  Additional CMS   ..............................  No.............  No.
                                Reports.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.10(f)...............  Waiver for       Procedures for Administrator    Yes............  Yes.
                                Recordkeeping/   to waive.
                                Reporting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.11..................  Flares.........  ..............................  No.............  No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.12..................  Delegation.....  State authority to enforce      Yes............  Yes.
                                                 standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.13..................  Addresses......  Addresses where reports,        Yes............  Yes.
                                                 notifications, and requests
                                                 are sent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.14..................  Incorporation    Test methods incorporated by    Yes............  Yes.
                                by Reference.    reference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.  63.15..................  Availability of  Public and confidential         Yes............  Yes.
                                Information.     information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 02-12771 Filed 7-8-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P