[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2002)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 45073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-16865]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 264-0354b; FRL-7234-6]


Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Imperial 
County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Imperial County 
Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) portion of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern definitions. We are 
proposing to approve a local rule that addresses definitions under the 
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by August 7, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-
4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
    You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revisions and EPA's 
technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal 
business hours. You may also see copies of the submitted SIP revisions 
at the following locations:

California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
Evaluation Section, 1001 ``I'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, 150 South 9th Street, 
El Centro, CA 92243-2801

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia G. Allen, Rulemaking Office 
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 947-
4120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local 
rule: ICAPCD 101. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal 
Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct final action 
without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not 
controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish 
a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments 
in subsequent action based on this proposed rule.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone 
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not 
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further 
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: May 24, 2002.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 02-16865 Filed 7-5-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P