[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 29, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37323-37325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-13246]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL189-1a; FRL-7212-9]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to particulate matter control 
requirements for rural grain elevators in Illinois. On April 8, 1999, 
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted section 9 
of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (as revised by Public Act 
89-491) as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation 
Plan (SIP). The requested SIP revision exempts rural grain elevators 
from certain particulate matter control requirements. An air quality 
modeling analysis was conducted to show that this rule change would not 
cause or contribute to violation of the National Ambient Air Quality 
Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter 
less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM10).

DATES: This rule is effective on July 29, 2002, unless EPA receives 
relevant adverse written comments by June 28, 2002. If adverse comment 
is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the 
Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take 
effect.

ADDRESSES: You should send written comments to: Patricia Morris, Acting 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    You may inspect copies of the State submittal and EPA's analysis of 
it at:
    Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Pohlman, Environmental 
Scientist, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3299.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' are used we mean EPA.

Table of Contents

I. What is the EPA approving?
    a. What sources are being exempted?
    b. What requirements are they being exempted from?
    c. What requirements still apply?
II. Analysis of the requested SIP revision
III. What are the environmental effects of this action?
IV. EPA rulemaking action.
V. Administrative requirements.

I. What Is the EPA Approving?

    EPA is approving section 9 of the Illinois Environmental Protection 
Act (as revised by Public Act 89-491) as a revision to the Illinois 
SIP. The revised Illinois Environmental Protection Act exempts rural 
grain elevators from particulate matter control requirements contained 
in section 212.462 of Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code (35 
IAC 212.462).

a. What Sources Are Being Exempted?

    The exemption applies to ``any grain elevator located outside of a 
major population area'' provided that the elevator:
    1. does not violate the pollution prohibition in subsection (a) of 
section 9 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act or have a 
certified investigation on file with the Illinois EPA; and,
    2. Is not required to obtain a Clean Air Act Permit Program permit.
    ``Major population areas'' are defined at 35 IAC 211.3610. 
Generally, major population areas include Cook, Lake, DuPage, and Will 
Counties; portions of McHenry, Kane, and St. Clair Counties; as well as 
the municipalities of Kankakee, Rockford, Moline, Galesburg, Peoria, 
Pekin, Bloomington/Normal, Champaign/Urbana, Decatur, Springfield, and 
surrounding areas.
    Subsection (a) of section 9 of the Illinois Environmental 
Protection Act states ``No person shall cause or threaten or allow the 
discharge or emission of any contaminant into the environment in any 
State so as to cause or tend to cause air pollution in Illinois, either 
alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, or so as 
to violate regulations or standards adopted by the [Illinois Pollution 
Control Board] under this Act.''
    A ``certified investigation'' means ``a report signed by Illinois 
Environmental Protection Agency personnel certifying whether a grain-
handling operation (or portion thereof) or grain-drying operation is 
causing or tending to cause air pollution.''
    A Clean Air Act Permit Program permit is a permit required under 
section 39.5 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. For sources 
of particulate matter pollution, such as grain elevators, sources with 
a potential to emit over 100 tons of PM10 per year are required to 
obtain permits under this program.

b. What Requirements Are They Being Exempted From?

    The revised Illinois Environmental Protection Act exempts rural 
grain elevators from particulate matter control requirements contained 
in 35 IAC 212.462. The requirements in 35 IAC 212.462 are applicable 
only to operations with a total annual grain throughput of 300,000 
bushels or more. 35 IAC 212.462 requires sources to apply for a permit 
subject to 35 IAC 201. 35 IAC 212.462 also requires, among other 
requirements, control equipment with 90% particulate removal efficiency 
on cleaning and separating operations, major dump-pit areas, internal 
transferring areas, and watercraft loadout areas. 35 IAC 212.462 
requires truck and hopper car loading to use socks, sleeves or choke 
loading, and for box car loading emissions to be controlled ``to the 
fullest extent which is technically and economically feasible''.

[[Page 37324]]

c. What Requirements Still Apply?

    Illinois grain elevators exempted from the requirements of 35 IAC 
212.462 continue to be regulated by 35 IAC 212.461 which includes 
housekeeping requirements such as maintenance and operation of existing 
control equipment, and requirements for cleaning and maintenance of 
areas such as floors, roofs, and property. No visible emissions are 
allowed from the head house.
    Grain drying operations continue to be regulated by 35 IAC 212.463, 
which contains specific requirements for different types of grain 
dryers.
    Sources exempted from 35 IAC 212.462 are also subject to the 
opacity limits of 35 IAC 212.123, which limit opacity of emissions to 
30%, generally. 60% opacity is allowed for up to 8 minutes per hour, on 
no more than 3 occasions in any 24-hour period.
    Additionally, New Source Performance Standards (Title 40 Code of 
Federal Regulations, part 60, subpart DD) apply to grain elevators 
constructed or modified after August 3, 1978. These Federal 
regulations, generally, contain limits on grain loading/unloading, 
grain drying, and material handling operations at grain elevators with 
a permanent storage capacity of more than 2.5 million bushels.

II. Analysis of the Requested SIP Revision

    Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act) states that EPA shall not 
approve a requested SIP revision if the revision would interfere with 
any applicable requirement of the Act. While the requested SIP revision 
does not apply to any PM10 ``nonattainment areas'', it is a relaxation 
of the current SIP. Therefore, to satisfy section 110(l) of the Act, an 
air quality modeling analysis was conducted to determine whether the 
requested SIP revision would cause or contribute to violations of PM10 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Illinois submitted a 
modeling analysis, and the EPA conducted further analyses to confirm 
the State's results. The modeling analyses considered a representative 
rural grain elevator with a throughput of 2.5 million bushels per year, 
using conservative emissions estimates, and including estimates of 
background PM10 concentrations. The analysis showed that the requested 
SIP revision will not cause or contribute to violations of the PM10 
NAAQS. The NAAQS for PM10 are 150 and 50 micrograms per cubic meter 
([mu]g/m\3\) for the 24-hour and annual standards, respectively. The 
final modeling analysis results showed an expected 24-hour (highest 
sixth-high plus background) concentration of 129 [mu]g/m\3\ and an 
expected annual-average concentration 41 ug/m\3\. For a detailed 
discussion, see the Technical Support Document dated April 23, 2002.
    EPA thus concludes that this submittal will not interfere with 
attainment or any other Act requirement. Therefore, EPA is approving 
the requested SIP revision.

III. What Are the Environmental Effects of This Action?

    As discussed above, while this submittal allows somewhat more 
emissions in rural areas than was previously allowed, air quality 
modeling analysis shows that approval of this requested SIP revision 
will not result in violations of the PM10 NAAQS. (For more information 
see the Technical Support Document dated April 23, 2002.)

IV. EPA Rulemaking Action

    We are approving, through direct final rulemaking, revisions to 
particulate matter control requirements for rural grain elevators in 
Illinois. We are publishing this action without prior proposal because 
we view this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipate no adverse 
comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal Register 
publication, we are proposing to approve the SIP revision in case 
adverse written comments are filed. This action will be effective 
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written 
comment by June 28, 2002. Should we receive such comments, we will 
publish a final rule informing the public that this action will not 
take effect. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
do so at this time. If no such comments are received, this action will 
be effective on July 29, 2002.

V. Administrative Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule 
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean 
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically 
significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not 
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the

[[Page 37325]]

agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes 
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report 
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the 
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. 
A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in 
the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 29, 2002. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Particulate 
matter, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 7, 2002.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title 
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart O--Illinois

    2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(165) to read 
as follows:


[sect] 52.720  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (165) On April 8, 1999, the Illinois Environmental Protection 
Agency submitted revisions to particulate matter control requirements 
for rural grain elevators in Illinois. The revised requirements exempt 
rural grain elevators from certain particulate matter control 
requirements.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. Revised grain elevator provisions 
in Section 9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. Adopted 
by both Houses of the Illinois General Assembly as Public Act 89-491 
(previously Senate Bill 1633) on April 25, 1996, approved by the 
Governor of Illinois on May 23, 1996, effective June 21, 1996.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 02-13246 Filed 5-28-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P