[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 95 (Thursday, May 16, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34844-34848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-12281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[IN004a; FRL-7212-6]


Clean Air Act Final Approval of Operating Permit Program 
Revisions; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve revisions to the 
operating permit program of the State of Indiana. Indiana submitted its 
operating permit program in response to the directive in the 1990 Clean 
Air Act Amendments that states develop, and submit to EPA, programs for 
issuing operating permits to all major stationary sources and to 
certain other sources within the states' jurisdiction. EPA granted full 
approval to Indiana's operating permit program effective November 30, 
2001. At that time, EPA also issued a notice of program deficiency 
(NOD) in which EPA identified problems with Indiana's program and a 
timeframe within which Indiana had to correct the problems. Indiana 
submitted revisions to its operating permit program on February 7, 
2002. These program revisions include regulatory changes which resolve 
deficiencies that EPA identified in the NOD. This action also includes 
other changes to the state's title V regulations. One of the 
deficiencies EPA identified in the NOD is not included in this 
submittal because it is part of a separate State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) submittal. EPA will take action on that submittal in a separate 
Federal Register document.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective July 15, 2002, without 
further notice unless EPA receives adverse comments in writing by June 
17, 2002. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely 
notice in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will 
not take effect. EPA will address the public comments in a subsequent 
final rule based on the proposed rule published in this Federal 
Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the state's submittal and other supporting 
information used in developing the proposed approval are available for 
inspection during normal business hours at the following location: EPA 
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, AR-18J, Chicago, Illinois, 60604. 
Please contact Sam Portanova at (312) 886-3189 to arrange a time if 
inspection of the submittal is desired.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam Portanova, AR-18J, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, Telephone Number: (312) 886-3189, 
E-Mail Address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This section provides additional information 
by addressing the following questions:

    What is being addressed in this document?
    What are the program changes that EPA is approving?
    What is involved in this final action?

What Is Being Addressed in This Document?

    As required under Subchapter V of the Clean Air Act (``the Act''), 
as amended (1990), EPA has promulgated regulations which define the 
minimum elements of an approvable state operating permits program and 
the corresponding standards and procedures by which the EPA will 
approve, oversee, and withdraw approval of state operating permits 
programs (see 57 FR 32250 (July 21, 1992)). These regulations are 
codified at 40 CFR part 70. Pursuant to subchapter V, generally known 
as title V, states developed, and submitted to EPA, programs for 
issuing operating permits to all major stationary sources and to 
certain other sources.
    The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted 
its title V operating permits program (title V program) for approval on 
August 10, 1994. EPA promulgated interim approval of the Indiana title 
V program on November 14, 1995 (60 FR 57188), and the program became 
effective on December 14, 1995. Subsequently, EPA promulgated full 
approval of the Indiana title V program effective November 30, 2001. 
EPA published this action in the Federal Register on December 4, 2001 
(66 FR 62969).
    Pursuant to its authority at 40 CFR 70.10(b), EPA published a NOD 
for Indiana's title V operating permit program on December 11, 2001 (66 
FR 64039). The NOD was based upon EPA's finding that several state 
requirements do not meet the minimum federal requirements of 40 CFR 
part 70 and the Act for program approval. Indiana has adopted rule 
revisions to resolve all of the deficiencies identified in the December 
11, 2001 NOD. These rule revisions became effective, as a matter of 
state law, on January 19, 2002. Indiana submitted some of these rule 
changes as a revision to its title V operating permit program on 
February 7, 2002. Indiana also included, in the February 7, 2002 
submittal, other regulatory revisions that strengthen Indiana's 
program. EPA is approving the Indiana rule revisions included in the 
February 7, 2002 submittal in today's action. On March 5, 2002, Indiana 
submitted a rule revision addressing one of the deficiencies identified 
in the NOD for approval into the State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA 
will take action on this rule revision in a separate Federal Register 
document. The public will have an opportunity to comment on this rule 
revision when EPA publishes the Federal Register

[[Page 34845]]

document taking action on the March 5, 2002 SIP submittal.

What Are the Program Changes That EPA Is Approving?

A. Insignificant Activity Definition

(i) Emission Thresholds
    Indiana has revised 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A) to establish insignificant 
activity emission thresholds for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and 
volatile organic compounds (VOC). Previously, the definition of 
insignificant activity in the Indiana rule did not include specific 
insignificant activity threshold levels for NOX and VOC. The 
rule referred to the limits in 326 IAC 2-1.1-3(d)(1) to establish the 
insignificant activity threshold levels for these two pollutants. The 
threshold levels in this provision was 10 tons per year for both 
NOX and VOC. EPA considers this an unacceptably high 
threshold for insignificant activities and, as a result, identified 
this issue as a deficiency in the December 11, 2001 NOD for the Indiana 
title V program. The revised 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A) language establishes 
a VOC insignificant activity threshold of 3 pounds per hour or 15 
pounds per day and a NOX insignificant activity threshold of 
5 pounds per hour or 25 pounds per day. These threshold levels are 
equivalent to the VOC and NOX thresholds that EPA originally 
approved as part of the November 14, 1995, interim approval of 
Indiana's title V program. In today's action, EPA is approving this 
rule language as a revision to the Indiana title V program. This 
revision satisfies Indiana's requirement to correct an identified 
program deficiency and resolves the issue published in the NOD.
(ii) Permit modification requirements
    In order to remedy a problematic regulation that impacted Indiana's 
program but was not identified by EPA in the NOD, Indiana has revised 
326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(K) to clarify the applicability of the permit 
modification process described in 326 IAC 2-7-12 which applies to a 
modification of an existing insignificant activity or the addition of 
an insignificant activity to a title V source. Under the previous 
version of this rule, all modifications that qualified as an 
insignificant activity were exempted from the 326 IAC 2-7-12 
modification requirements. This revised provision allows insignificant 
activities to avoid the permit modification requirements only if the 
existing permit includes all requirements and associated monitoring 
applicable to the activity and if the activity is not a modification 
under any provisions of title I of the Act. EPA considers this 
provision to be consistent with 40 CFR 70.5(c), which does not require 
insignificant activities to be included in permit applications unless 
information on the activity is necessary to determine applicability of, 
or to impose, any applicable requirement or to determine fees. In 
today's action, EPA is approving this revision to IAC 2-7-1(21)(K) as a 
revision to the Indiana title V program.

B. Trivial Activities

    In order to remedy a problematic regulation that impacted Indiana's 
program but was not identified by EPA in the NOD, Indiana revised its 
definition of trivial activity in 326 IAC 2-7-1(40). This definition 
was established pursuant to the July 10, 1995, EPA memorandum titled 
``White Paper for Streamlined Development of Part 70 Permit 
Applications'', which states that ``there is flexibility inherent in 
Sec. 70.5 to tailor the level of information required in the 
application to be commensurate with the need to determine applicable 
requirements. The EPA believes this inherent flexibility encompasses 
the idea that certain activities are clearly trivial (i.e., emissions 
units and activities with specific applicable requirements and with 
extremely small emissions) and can be omitted from the application.''
    Indiana's trivial activity definition includes an emission 
threshold of one pound per day of potential uncontrolled emissions of 
any criteria pollutant for an activity to be considered trivial. 326 
IAC 2-7-1(40)(B) through (Q) lists activities which shall be considered 
trivial for title V permit application purposes. The July 10, 1995, 
white paper includes examples of activities which EPA believes should 
normally qualify as trivial. This list is intended only as a starting 
point for states and is not a comprehensive list of what EPA accepts as 
trivial activities. Many of the activities listed in 2-7-1(40) are 
listed in the July 10, 1995, white paper as examples of trivial 
activities. EPA agrees that the remaining 2-7-1(40) activities are 
inherently trivial. The exclusion of trivial activities from title V 
permit applications will allow sources and the state to direct their 
resources towards permitting activities that have significant 
environmental impacts.
    Under the previous version of this rule, all activities listed in 
326 IAC 2-7-1(40) qualified as trivial and were exempted from inclusion 
in the source's title V permit application without regard to 
information needed to document applicable requirements and compliance 
status. Indiana's revised trivial activity definition states, in 326 
IAC 2-7-1(40)(R), that trivial activities are excluded from the permit 
modification requirements of 326 IAC 2-7-12 only if the existing permit 
includes all requirements and associated monitoring applicable to the 
activity and if the activity is not a modification under any provisions 
of title I of the Act. In addition, the revision to 326 IAC 2-7-1(40) 
states that trivial activities need not be included in title V permit 
applications provided that the applicant documents applicable 
requirements and compliance status as required by the permit 
application provisions of the state title V rule. These provisions 
provide assurance that title V permits include all applicable 
requirements and associated monitoring for units and activities that 
may qualify as trivial under the 326 IAC 2-7-1(40) definition. In 
today's action, EPA is approving Indiana's definition of trivial 
activity in 326 IAC 2-7-1(40) as a revision to the Indiana title V 
program.

C. Proposed Exemptions From Applicable Requirements

    In order to remedy a problematic regulation that impacted Indiana's 
program but was not identified by EPA in the NOD, Indiana has revised 
326 IAC 2-7-4(c) to remove rule language which allowed sources to 
include in their permit application an explanation of any proposed 
exemptions from otherwise applicable requirements. Since title V does 
not provide for exemptions from applicable requirements, this language 
was not consistent with the requirements of title V and 40 CFR part 70. 
In today's action, EPA is approving the removal of this rule language 
as a revision to the Indiana title V program.

D. Compliance Certification

    Indiana revised 326 IAC 2-7-4(c)(10) and (11) to remove rule 
language that allows sources to certify compliance with alternative or 
streamlined requirements instead of the underlying applicable 
requirements. This issue is identified and discussed in more detail in 
the December 11, 2001 NOD for the Indiana title V program. In addition, 
Indiana revised 326 IAC 2-7-5(3) to remove rule language that refers to 
alterative or streamlined requirements with respect to monitoring, 
recordkeeping, and reporting. In today's action, EPA is approving the 
removal of this language as a revision to the Indiana title V program. 
This revision satisfies Indiana's requirement to correct an identified 
program deficiency and resolves the issue published in the NOD.

[[Page 34846]]

E. Operating Parameter Exceedances

    Indiana revised 326 IAC 2-7-5(1) to remove rule language stating 
that an exceedance of a permit limit and the corresponding operating 
parameter shall constitute a single violation. This rule provision 
restricted the state's enforcement authority to restrain or enjoin and 
to assess a civil penalty for the violation of any permit condition as 
required by 40 CFR 70.11. EPA identified this provision as a title V 
deficiency in the December 11, 2001 NOD for the Indiana title V 
program. In today's action, EPA is approving the removal of this 
language as a revision to the Indiana title V program. This revision 
satisfies Indiana's requirement to correct an identified program 
deficiency and resolves the issue published in the NOD.

F. Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Exceedances

    Indiana revised 326 IAC 2-7-5(1) to remove rule language which 
allowed exceedances of emission limits during startups, shutdowns, and 
malfunctions on a case-by-case basis. This would have allowed the 
permitting authority to establish, through the title V permitting 
process, limits which exceeded applicable requirements. EPA identified 
this provision as a title V deficiency in the December 11, 2001 NOD for 
the Indiana title V program. In today's action, EPA is approving this 
rule revision as a revision to the Indiana title V program. This 
revision satisfies Indiana's requirement to correct an identified 
program deficiency and resolves the issue published in the NOD.

G. Administrative Permit Amendments

    In order to remedy a problematic regulation that impacted Indiana's 
program but was not identified by EPA in the NOD, Indiana has revised 
326 IAC 2-7-11(a)(7) to remove language that allowed changes to 
monitoring, maintenance, or recordkeeping requirements to be processed 
as an administrative permit amendment if the changes were ``not 
environmentally significant'' and not required by an applicable 
requirement. This rule revision will prevent relaxations in monitoring, 
maintenance, or recordkeeping requirements from being processed as an 
administrative permit amendment. In today's action, EPA is approving 
the removal of this language as a revision to the Indiana title V 
program.

H. Minor Permit Modification Procedures

    Indiana has added new rule language in 326 IAC 2-7-12(b)(4) which 
requires minor modifications to be subject to the public notice 
provisions of 326 IAC 2-7-17. This revision restores the minor permit 
modification requirements that were in effect when EPA granted interim 
approval to the Indiana title V program and is necessary because minor 
permit modifications qualify for a permit shield under the Indiana 
regulations. During EPA's original review of Indiana's title V program, 
which resulted in granting interim approval on November 14, 1995, the 
Indiana regulations required minor modifications to be subject to 
public review equivalent to that required by 40 CFR 70.6, 70.7 and 
70.8, and allowed such modifications to qualify for a permit shield. In 
reviewing that original regulation, EPA determined that the permit 
shield was acceptable in this situation because of the availability of 
public review. Subsequent to the November 14, 1995, interim approval, 
Indiana modified its regulations to remove the public notice 
requirement from the minor modification provision. However, the state 
did not remove the permit shield provision. Therefore, EPA identified 
this provision as a title V deficiency in the December 11, 2001 NOD for 
the Indiana title V program. In today's action, EPA is approving 
Indiana's new rule language in 326 IAC 2-7-12(b)(4) as a revision to 
the Indiana title V program. This revision satisfies Indiana's 
requirement to correct an identified program deficiency and resolves 
the issue published in the NOD.

I. Emergency Provision

    In order to remedy a problematic regulation that impacted Indiana's 
program but was not identified by EPA in the NOD, Indiana has revised 
326 IAC 2-7-16 to remove language which states that an emergency 
constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for 
noncompliance with a health-based emission limitation. This rule 
revision is consistent with the requirements in 40 CFR 70.6(g), which 
restricts the emergency provision to noncompliance with technology-
based emission limitations. In today's action, EPA is approving the 
removal of this language as a revision to the Indiana title V program.

J. Streamlined Requirements

    326 IAC 2-7-24 of Indiana's title V rule allows for the 
establishment of streamlined requirements for units subject to multiple 
requirements. This section of the state rule was established subsequent 
to the November 14, 1995 EPA action granting interim approval to the 
Indiana title V program. EPA has not previously approved this section 
of the rule as a revision to the Indiana title V program. The March 5, 
1996, EPA memorandum titled ``White Paper Number 2 for Improved 
Implementation of the Part 70 Operating Permits Program'' explains how 
permitting authorities may streamline multiple, overlapping 
requirements into one permit condition that will assure compliance with 
all requirements. Indiana's rule requires streamlined limits to be at 
least as stringent as all subsumed requirements and to be enforceable 
as a practical matter. Permits issued with streamlined limits must 
include citations to all subsumed requirements and must include any 
additional terms and conditions necessary to assure compliance with the 
streamlined limit and all subsumed requirements. Permits containing 
streamlined limits must be issued pursuant to the permit issuance, 
renewal, or significant modification requirements of Indiana's title V 
rule. EPA finds this rule provision to be consistent with 40 CFR part 
70 and, in today's action, is approving 326 IAC 2-7-24 as a revision to 
the Indiana title V program.

K. Other NOD Issues

    Indiana had two additional NOD issues listed in the December 11, 
2001, Federal Register notice. Resolution of these two issues required 
revisions to portions of the Indiana rules that are not part of the 
state's title V regulations. Indiana has adopted these required 
revisions to their state rules and the revisions became effective, as a 
matter of state law, on January 19, 2002. Since these rule revisions 
are not part of the state's title V regulations, they were not included 
in the February 7, 2002, submittal and they will not be included in 
this action as revisions to the Indiana title V program. As explained 
in further detail below, the revision addressing one of these NOD 
issues will require no further action by EPA. Indiana has submitted, as 
a SIP revision, the other NOD issue and EPA will address that submittal 
in a separate Federal Register document.
(i) Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, Volatile Organic 
Compounds, and Lead Exemption Levels
    Indiana rule 326 IAC 2-1.1-3(d) allowed the state to exempt from 
the title V minor or significant modification

[[Page 34847]]

requirements sulfur dioxide, NOX, and VOC emission increases 
of up to 10 tons per year and carbon monoxide emission increases of up 
to 25 tons per year. In addition, 326 IAC 2-1.1-3(g) allows the state 
to exempt from the title V minor or significant modification 
requirements lead emissions increases of up to 5 tons per year. Because 
40 CFR 70.6(e) does not allow the permitting authority to create 
exemptions from the permit modification requirements, Indiana's program 
did not meet the program approval requirements of title V and 40 CFR 
part 70. Indiana has corrected this deficiency by removing language 
from 326 IAC 2-1.1-3(d) and 326 IAC 2-1.1-3(g) which apply these 
provisions to title V sources and title V modifications. This rule 
revision became effective on January 19, 2002.
    This rule provision is intended for minor sources and is not part 
of Indiana's title V regulations. Therefore, it will not be included as 
a change to the Indiana title V program. Since this rule provision was 
never approved into the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP), no SIP 
revision is required to accommodate this correction. EPA considers this 
program deficiency, which was identified in the NOD, to be resolved.
(ii) Supersession
    Indiana's construction permits expire upon issuance of a valid 
title V permit; therefore, the construction permit conditions do not 
exist independently of title V permits. Applicable requirements must 
exist independently of title V permits. Allowing the underlying 
applicable requirements to expire could cause Indiana to lose the 
authority to include such conditions in renewed title V permits. 
Because Indiana's rules did not assure that construction permit 
conditions exist independently of title V permits, this issue was 
identified in the December 11, 2001 NOD as not meeting the program 
approval requirements of title V and 40 CFR part 70.
    Indiana subsequently revised the state regulations in 326 IAC 2-
1.1-9.5 to say that ``any condition established in a permit issued 
pursuant to a permitting program approved into the state implementation 
plan shall remain in effect until: (1) The condition is modified in a 
subsequent permit action; or (2) the emission unit to which the 
condition pertains permanently ceases operation.'' ``Subsequent permit 
action'' in this rule refers to a permit action taken pursuant to 
Indiana's construction permit authority. Since title V authority cannot 
modify existing applicable requirements, including construction permit 
conditions, ``subsequent permit action'' does not include permit 
actions taken pursuant to Indiana's title V program. This rule 
provision is not part of Indiana's title V regulations and, therefore, 
will not be included as a change to the Indiana title V program. 
Indiana submitted this rule provision for approval into the Indiana SIP 
on March 5, 2002, and EPA will take action on this submittal in a 
separate Federal Register document. The public will have an opportunity 
to comment on this provision when EPA publishes a Federal Register 
notice taking action on the March 5, 2002, SIP submittal.

What Is Involved in This Final Action?

    The EPA is granting approval to the Indiana title V operating 
permits program revisions submitted by IDEM on February 7, 2002. These 
revisions meet the minimum program requirements of 40 CFR part 70, 
resolve issues raised in EPA's December 11, 2001 NOD of the Indiana 
title V program, and strengthen Indiana's program.

Administrative Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this final approval is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the 
Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also 
not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations 
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting 
federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond 
those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies 
that this final approval will not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing 
requirements under state law and does not impose any additional 
enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain 
an unfunded mandate nor does it significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(Public Law 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal 
government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175, 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000). This rule also does not have federalism 
implications because it will not have substantial direct effects on the 
states, on the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, 
``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule merely 
approves existing requirements under state law, and does not alter the 
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the state and the federal government established in the Act.
    This final approval is also not subject to Executive Order 13045, 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not a significant 
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. This action will not 
impose any collection of information subject to the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., other than those 
previously approved and assigned OMB control number 2060-0243. For 
additional information concerning these requirements, see 40 CFR part 
70. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.
    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (NTTA), 15 U.S.C. 272 note, requires federal agencies to 
use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary 
consensus to carry out policy objectives, so long as such standards are 
not inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impracticable. In 
reviewing state operating permit programs submitted pursuant to title V 
of the Act, EPA will approve state programs provided that they meet the 
requirements of the Act and EPA's regulations codified at 40 CFR part 
70. Absent a prior existing requirement for the state to use voluntary 
consensus standards, EPA has no authority to disapprove a state 
operating permit program for failure to use such standards, and it 
would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use voluntary 
consensus standards in place of a state program that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Act. Therefore, the requirements of 
section 12(d) of the NTTA do not apply.

[[Page 34848]]

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by July 15, 2002. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2) of the Act.)

List of Subjects in Part 70

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits, 
and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 3, 2002.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 70 is amended as follows:

PART 70--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. sections 7401 et seq.

    2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (c) in the 
entry for Indiana to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating 
Permits Programs

* * * * *

Indiana

    (a) * * *
    (b) * * *
    (c) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management: program 
revisions submitted on February 7, 2002. These revisions are hereby 
granted final approval effective June 17, 2002.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 02-12281 Filed 5-15-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P