[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31844-31845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-11732]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and as part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the National Science Foundation 
(NSF) is inviting the general public and other Federal agencies to 
comment on this proposed continuing information collection. This is the 
second notice for public comment; the first was published in the 
Federal Register at 67 FR 8563 and no comments were received. NSF is 
forwarding the proposed submission to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously with the publication of this 
second notice.

DATES: Comments regarding these information collections are best 
assured of having their full effect if received by OMB within 30 days 
of publication in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding (a) whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
NSF, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) 
the accuracy of NSF's estimate of burden including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; or (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for 
National Science Foundation, 725--17th Street, NW., Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503, and to Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance 
Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 295, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230 or send e-mail to [email protected]. Copies of 
the submission may be obtained by calling (703) 292-7556.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne H. Plimpton, NSF Reports 
Clearance Officer at (703) 292-7556 or send email to [email protected].
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB 
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to 
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not 
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title of Collection: National Science Foundation Science Honorary 
Awards.
    OMB Control No.: 3145-0035.
    Abstract: The National Science Foundation (NSF) administers several 
honorary awards, among them the President's National Medal of Science, 
the Alan T. Waterman Award, the NSB Vannevar Bush Award, and the NSB 
Public Service Award.
    Use of the Information: The Foundation has the following honorary 
award programs:
     President's National Medal of Science. Statutory authority 
for the President's National Medal of Science is contained in 42 U.S.C. 
1881 Pub. L. 86-209), which established the award and stated that 
``(t)he President shall * * * award the Medal on the recommendations 
received from the National Academy of Sciences or on the basis of such 
other information and evidence as * * * appropriate.''
    Subsequently, Executive Order 10961 specified procedures for the 
Award by establishing a National Medal of Science Committee which would 
``receive recommendations made by any other nationally representative 
scientific or engineering organization.'' On the basis of these 
recommendations, the Committee was directed to select its candidates 
and to forward its recommendations to the President.
    In 1962, to comply with these directives, the Committee initiated a 
solicitation form letter to invite these nominations. In 1979, the 
Committee initiated a nomination form as an attachment to the 
solicitation letter. A slightly modified version of the nomination form 
was used in 1980. The Committee agreed that such a form standardized 
the nomination format, benefiting the nomiminator, making the 
Committee's review process more efficient and permitted better staff 
work in a shorter period of time. Form NSF-1122 will be used to further 
standardize the nomination procedures, thus continuing to allow for 
more effective committee review, and permitting better staff work in a 
shorter period of time.
    The Committee has established the following guidelines for 
selection of candidates:
    1. The total impact of an individual's work on the present state of 
physical, biological, mathematical, engineering, or social and 
behavioral sciences is to be the principal criterion.
    2. Achievement of an unusually significant nature in relation to 
the potential effects of such achievement on the development of 
scientific thought.
    3. Unusually distinguished service in the general advancement of 
science and engineering, when accompanied by substantial contributions 
to the content of science at some time.
    4. Recognition by peers within the scientific community.
    5. Contributions to innovation and industry.
    6. Influence on education through publications, students.
    7. Must be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident who has applied for 
citizenship.
    Nominations remain active for a period of four years, including the 
year of nomination. After that time, candidates must be renominated 
with a new nomination package for them to be considered by the 
Committee.
    Nomination forms should be typewritten, single-spaced using a font 
no smaller than 12 characters per inch. Renominations may be submitted 
via an updated nomination form.
     Alan T. Waterman Award. Congress established the Alan T. 
Waterman Award in August 1975 (42 U.S.C. 1881a (Pub. L. 94-86) and 
authorized NSP to ``establish the Alan T. Waterman Award for resrach or 
advanced study in any of

[[Page 31845]]

the sciences or engineering'' to mark the 25th anniversary of the 
National Science Foundation and to honor its first Director. The annual 
award recognizes an outstanding young researcher in any field of 
science or engineering supported by NSF. In addition to a medal, the 
awardee receives a grant of $500,000 over a three-year period for 
scientific research or advanced study in the mathematical, physical, 
medical, biological, engineering, social, or other sciences at the 
institution of the recipient's choice.
    The Alan T. Waterman Award Committee was established by NSF to 
comply with the directive contained in Public Law 94-86. The Committee 
solicits nominations from members of the National Academy of Sciences, 
National Academy of Engineering, scientific and technical 
organizations, and any other source, public or private, as appropriate.
    In 1976, the Committee initiated a form letter to solicit these 
nominations. In 1980, a nomination form was used which standardized the 
nomination procedures, allowed for more effective Committee review, and 
permitted better staff work in a short period of time. On the basis of 
its review, the Committee forwards its recommendations to the Director, 
NSF, and the National Science Board (NSB).
    Candidates must be U.S. citizens or permanent residents and must be 
35 years of age or younger or not more than seven years beyond receipt 
of the PhD degree by December 31 of the year in which they are 
nominated. Candidates should have demonstrated exceptional individual 
achievements in scientific or engineering research of sufficient 
quality to place them at the forefront of their peers. Criteria include 
originality, innovation, and significant impact on the field.
     Vannevar Bush Award. The NSB established the Vannevar Bush 
Award in 1980 to honor Dr. Bush's unique contributions to public 
service. The annual award recognizes an individual who, through public 
service activities in science and technology, has made an outstanding 
``contribution toward the welfare of mankind and the Nation.''
    The NSB ad hoc Vannevar Bush Award Committee annually solicits 
nominations from selected scientific engineering and educational 
societies. Candidates must be a senior stateperson who is an American 
citizen and meets two or more of the following criteria:
    1. Distinguished him/herself through public service activities in 
science and technology.
    2. Pioneered the exploration, charting and settlement of new 
frontiers in science, technology, education and public service.
    3. Leadership and creativity has inspired others to distinguished 
careers in science and technology.
    4. Contributed to the welfare of the Nation and mankind through 
activities in science and technology.
    5. Leadership and creativity has helped mold the history of 
advancements in the Nation's science, technology, and education.
    Nomination submissions are in letter format, accompanied by a 
curriculum vitae (without publication), a brief citation summarizing 
the nominee's scientific or technological contributions to our national 
welfare in promotion of the progress of science, and two reference 
letters. Nominations remain active for three years, including the year 
of nomination.
     NSB Public Service Award. The NSB Public Service Award 
Committee was established in November 1996. This annual award 
recognizes people and organizations who have increased the public 
understanding of science or engineering. The award is given to an 
individual and to a group (company, corporation, or organization), but 
not to members of the U.S. Government.
    Eligibility includes any individual or group (company, corporation 
or organization) that has increased the public understanding of science 
or engineering. Members of the U.S. Government are not eligible for 
consideration.
    Candidates for the individual and group (company, corporation or 
organization) award must have made contributions to public service in 
areas other than research, and should meet one or more of the following 
criteria:
    1. Increased the public's understanding of the processes of science 
and engineering through scientific discovery, innovation and its 
communication to the public.
    2. Encouraged others to help raise the public understanding of 
science and technology.
    3. Promoted the engagement of scientists and engineers in public 
outreach and scientific literacy.
    4. Contributed to the development of broad science and engineering 
policy and its support.
    5. Influenced and encouraged the next generation of scientist and 
engineers.
    6. Achieved broad recognition outside the nominee's area of 
specialization.
    7. Fostered awareness of science and technology among broad 
segments of the population.
    Nomination procedures:
    1. Prepare a summary of the nominee's activities as they relate to 
the selection criteria. Include the nominator's name, address and 
telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of the 
nominee, as well as the nominee's vita, if appropriate (no more than 
three pages).
    2. The selection committee recommends the most outstanding 
candidate(s) for each category to the NSB, which approves the awardees.
    3. Nominations remain active for a period of three years, including 
the year of nomination. After that time, candidates must be renominated 
with a new nomination package for them to be considered by the 
selection committee.
    4. Nominations should be mailed or faxed to the NSB Public Service 
Award Advisory Committee. Electronic mail does not protect 
confidentiality and should not be used for this purpose.
    Estimate of Burden: These are annual award programs with 
application deadlines varying according to the program. Public burden 
also may vary according to program; however, it is estimated that each 
submission is averaged to be 15 hours per respondent for each program. 
If the nominator is thoroughly familiar with the scientific background 
of the nominee, time spent to complete the nomination may be 
considerably reduced.
    Respondents: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
organizations, universities, non-profit institutions, and Federal and 
State governments.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Award: 137 responses, broken down 
as follows: For the President's National Medal of Science, 55; for the 
Alan T. Waterman Award, 50; for the Vannevar Bush Award, 12; for the 
Public Service Award, 20.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,242 hours, broken 
down by 450 hours for the President's National Medal of Science (10 
hours per 45 respondents); 600 hours for the Alan T. Waterman Award (10 
hours per 60 respondents); 72 hours for the Vannevar Bush Award (6 
hours per 12 respondents); and 120 hours for the Public Service Award 
(6 hours per 20 respondents.
    Frequency of Responses: Annually.

    Dated: May 6, 2002.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 02-11732 Filed 5-9-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M