[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31733-31736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-11722]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[WV 060-6019a; FRL-7208-4]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
West Virginia; Nitrogen Oxides Budget Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the 
West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision was 
submitted in response to EPA's regulation entitled, ``Finding of 
Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone 
Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes of Reducing Regional 
Transport of Ozone,'' otherwise known as the ``NOX SIP 
Call.'' The revision establishes and requires a nitrogen oxides 
(NOX) allowance trading program for large electric 
generating and industrial units, beginning in 2004, as well as 
requirements for reductions in NOX emissions from cement 
manufacturing kilns. The intended effect of this action is to approve 
West Virginia's NOX Budget Trading Program because it 
addresses the requirements of the NOX SIP Call. On December 
26, 2000, EPA made a finding that West Virginia had failed to submit a 
SIP in response to the NOX SIP Call, thus starting the 18 
and 24 month clocks, respectively, for the mandatory imposition of 
sanctions and the obligation for EPA to promulgate a Federal 
Implementation Plan (FIP). On May 1, 2002, West Virginia submitted, as 
a SIP revision, its NOX Budget Trading Program in response 
to the NOX SIP Call. EPA found that SIP submission complete 
on May 1, 2002, thereby halting the sanctions clocks. Upon approval of 
this SIP revision, both the sanctions clocks and EPA's FIP obligation 
are terminated. EPA is approving this revision in accordance with the 
requirements of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This rule is effective on July 9, 2002 without further notice, 
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by June 10, 2002. If EPA 
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the 
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that 
the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to David L. Arnold, Chief, 
Air Quality Planning and Information Services Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the documents relevant to 
this action are available for public inspection during normal business 
hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 
and West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of 
Air Quality, 7012 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, WV 25304-2943.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cristina Fernandez, (215) 814-2178, or 
by e-mail at [email protected]. Please note any comments on 
this rule must be submitted in writing, as provided in the ADDRESSES 
section of this document.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 1, 2002, the West Virginia Department 
of Environmental Protection submitted a revision to its SIP to address 
the requirements of the NOX SIP Call. The revision consists 
of the adoption of Rule 45CSR26--Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program 
as Means of Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides from Electric 
Generating Units and Rule 45CSR1--Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading 
Program as Means of Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides. The 
information in this section of this document is organized as follows:

I. EPA's Action
    A. What Action Is EPA Taking In This Final Rulemaking?
    B. What Are the General NOX SIP Call Requirements?
    C. What Is EPA's NOX Budget Trading Program?
    D. What Standards Did EPA Use to Evaluate West Virginia's 
Submittal?
II. West Virginia's NOX Budget Trading Program
    A. When Did West Virginia Submit the SIP Revision to EPA in 
Response to the NOX SIP Call?
    B. What Is West Virginia's NOX Budget Program?
    C. What Is the Result of EPA's Evaluation of West Virginia's 
Program?
III. Final Action
IV. Administrative Requirements

I. EPA's Action

A. What Action Is EPA Taking in This Final Rulemaking?

    EPA is taking direct final action to approve the West Virginia 
NOX Budget Trading Program submitted as a SIP revision on 
May 1, 2002. Upon approval of this SIP revision, both the sanctions 
clocks and EPA's FIP obligation are terminated.

B. What Are the General NOX SIP Call Requirements?

    On October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA published a final rule 
entitled, ``Finding of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for 
Certain States in the Ozone Transport Assessment Group Region for 
Purposes of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone,'' otherwise known as 
the ``NOX SIP Call.'' The NOX SIP Call requires 
the District of Columbia and 22 States, including West Virginia, to 
meet statewide NOX emission budgets during the five-month 
period from May 1 through September 30. By meeting these budgets the 
states will reduce the amount of ground level ozone that is transported 
across the eastern United States. EPA has previously determined state-
wide NOX emission budgets for each affected jurisdiction to 
be met by the year 2007. EPA identified NOX emission 
reductions, by source category, that could be achieved by using cost-
effective measures. The source categories included were electric 
generating units (EGUs), non-electric generating units (non-EGUs), area 
sources, nonroad mobile sources and highway sources. However, the 
NOX SIP Call allowed states the flexibility to decide which 
source categories to regulate in order to meet the statewide budgets. 
In the NOX SIP Call rule's preamble, EPA suggested that 
imposing statewide NOX emissions caps on large fossil-fuel 
fired industrial boilers and electricity generating units would provide 
a highly cost effective means for States to meet their NOX 
budgets. In fact, the state-specific budgets were set assuming an 
emission rate of 0.15 pounds NOX per million British thermal 
units (lbs NOX/MMBtu) at EGUs,

[[Page 31734]]

multiplied by the projected heat input (MMBtu) from burning the 
quantity of fuel needed to meet the 2007 forecast for electricity 
demand. See 63 FR 57407, October 27, 1998. The calculation of the 2007 
EGU emissions assumed that an emissions trading program would be part 
of an EGU control program. The NOX SIP Call state budgets 
also assumed, on average, a 30 percent NOX reduction from 
cement kilns, a 60 percent reduction from industrial boilers and 
combustion turbines, and a 90 percent reduction from internal 
combustion engines. The non-EGU control assumptions were applied at 
units where the heat input capacities were greater than 250 MMBtu per 
hour, or in cases where heat input data were not available or 
appropriate, at units with actual emissions greater than one ton per 
day.
    To assist the states in their efforts to meet the SIP Call, the 
NOX SIP Call final rule included a model NOX 
allowance trading regulation, called ``NOX Budget Trading 
Program for State Implementation Plans'' (40 CFR part 96), that could 
be used by states to develop their regulations. The NOX SIP 
Call rulemaking explained that if states developed an allowance trading 
regulation consistent with the EPA model rule, they could participate 
in a regional allowance trading program that would be administered by 
EPA. See 63 FR 57458-57459, October 27, 1998.
    EPA conducted several comment periods on various aspects of the 
NOX SIP Call emissions inventories. On March 2, 2000 (65 FR 
11222), EPA published additional technical amendments to the 
NOX SIP Call. The March 2, 2000 final rulemaking established 
the inventories upon which West Virginia's final budget is based.
    A number of parties, including certain states as well as industry 
and labor groups, challenged the October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356) 
NOX SIP Call Rule. On March 3, 2000, the D.C. Circuit issued 
its decision on the NOX SIP Call ruling in favor of EPA on 
all of the major issues. Michigan v. EPA, 213 F.3d 663 (D.C. Cir. 
2000). However, the Court remanded certain matters for further 
rulemaking by EPA. EPA recently published a final notice that addresses 
one of the remanded issues and expects to publish this year another 
final notice that addresses the remaining remanded issues. Any 
additional emissions reductions required as a result of the final 
rulemaking will be reflected in the second phase portion (Phase II) of 
the NOX SIP Call rule. West Virginia will be required to 
submit SIP revisions to address the Phase II of the NOX SIP 
Call Rule.

C. What Is EPA's NOX Budget Trading Program?

    EPA's model NOX budget and allowance trading rule, 40 
CFR part 96, sets forth a NOX emissions trading program for 
large EGUs and non-EGUs. A state can voluntarily choose to adopt EPA's 
model rule in order to allow sources within its borders to participate 
in regional allowance trading. The October 27, 1998 final rulemaking 
contains a full description of the EPA's model NOX budget 
trading program. See 63 FR 57514-57538 and 40 CFR part 96. In general, 
air emissions trading uses market forces to reduce the overall cost of 
compliance for pollution sources, such as power plants, while 
maintaining emission reductions and environmental benefits. One type of 
market-based program is an emissions budget and allowance trading 
program, commonly referred to as a ``cap and trade'' program.
    In a cap and trade program, the state or EPA sets a regulatory 
limit, or emissions budget, of mass emissions from a specific group of 
sources. The budget limits the total number of allocated allowances 
during a particular control period. When the budget is set at a level 
lower than the current emissions, the effect is to reduce the total 
amount of emissions during the control period. After setting the 
budget, the state or EPA then assigns, or allocates, allowances to the 
participating entities up to the level of the budget. Each allowance 
authorizes the emission of a quantity of pollutant, e.g., one ton of 
airborne NOX. At the end of the control period, each source 
must demonstrate that its actual emissions during the control period 
were less than or equal to the number of available allowances it holds. 
Sources that reduce their emissions below their allocated allowance 
level may sell their extra allowances. Sources that emit more than the 
amount of their allocated allowance level may buy allowances from the 
sources with extra reductions. In this way, the budget is met in the 
most cost-effective manner.

D. What Standards Did EPA Use To Evaluate West Virginia's Submittal?

    The final NOX SIP Call rule included a model 
NOX budget trading program regulation at 40 CFR part 96. EPA 
used the model rule and 40 CFR 51.121 and 51.122 to evaluate West 
Virginia's NOX Budget Trading Program.

II. West Virginia's NOX Budget Trading Program

A. When Did West Virginia Submit the SIP Revision to EPA in Response to 
the NOX SIP Call?

    On May 1, 2002, the West Virginia Department of Environmental 
Protection submitted a revision to its SIP to address the requirements 
of the NOX SIP Call.

B. What Is West Virginia's NOX Budget Program?

    West Virginia's SIP revision to address the requirements of the 
NOX SIP Call consists of the adoption and submittal of Rule 
45CSR26--Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program as Means of Control and 
Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides from Electric Generating Units and Rule 
45CSR1--Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program as Means of Control and 
Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides.
    Rule 45CSR26 establishes and requires a NOX allowance 
trading program for large electric generating units. The sections of 
Rule 45CSR26--Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program as Means of 
Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides from Electric Generating Units 
which comprise West Virginia's SIP revision are as follows: sections 
45-26-1 through 45-26-7, General Provisions; sections 45-26-10 through 
45-26-14, NOX Authorized Account Representative; sections 
45-26-20 through 45-26-24, Permits; sections 45-26-30 through 45-26-31, 
Compliance Certifications; sections 45-26-40 through 45-26-43, 
NOX Allowance Allocations; sections 45-26-50 through 45-26-
57, Accounting Process for Deposit, Use and Transfer of Allowances; 
sections 45-26-60 through 45-26-62, NOX Allowance Transfers; 
and sections 45-26-70 through 45-26-76, Monitoring, Recordkeeping and 
Reporting Requirements.
    Rule 45CSR1 establishes and requires a NOX allowance 
trading program for large non-electric generating units and reductions 
of NOX emissions from cement manufacturing kilns. The 
sections of Rule 45CSR1--Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program as 
Means of Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides which comprise West 
Virginia's SIP revision are as follows: sections 45-1-1 through 45-1-7, 
General Provisions; sections 45-1-10 through 45-1-14, NOX 
Authorized Account Representative; sections 45-1-20 through 45-1-24, 
Permits; sections 45-1-30 through 45-1-31, Compliance Certifications; 
sections 45-1-40 through 45-1-43, NOX Allowance Allocations;

[[Page 31735]]

sections 45-1-50 through 45-1-57, Accounting Process for Deposit, Use 
and Transfer of Allowances; sections 45-1-60 through 45-1-62, 
NOX Allowance Transfers; sections 45-1-70 through 45-1-76, 
Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements; sections 45-1-80 
through 45-1-88, Opt-In Requirements; section 45-1-100, Requirements 
for Emissions of NOX from Cement Manufacturing Kilns.
    Rule 45CSR26 and Rule 45CSR1 establish a NOX cap and 
allowance trading program with a budget of 29,043 tons of 
NOX for the ozone seasons of 2004 and beyond. The 
NOX budgets for large electric generating units and large 
non-electric generating units are 26,859 and 2,184 tons of 
NOX per ozone season, respectively. Cement manufacturing 
kilns are not part of the trading program. West Virginia voluntarily 
chose to follow EPA's model NOX budget and allowance trading 
rule, 40 CFR part 96, that sets forth a NOX emissions 
trading program for large EGUs and non-EGUs. Because West Virginia's 
NOX Budget Trading Program is based upon EPA's model rule, 
West Virginia sources are allowed to participate in the interstate 
NOX allowance trading program that EPA will administer for 
the participating states. West Virginia has adopted regulations that 
are substantively identical to 40 CFR part 96. Therefore, pursuant to 
40 CFR 51.121(p)(1), West Virginia's SIP revision is automatically 
approved as satisfying its portion of NOX emission 
reductions.
    Under the NOX Budget Trading Program, West Virginia 
allocates NOX allowances to the EGUs and non-EGUs units that 
are affected by these requirements. The NOX trading program 
generally applies to fossil fuel fired EGUs with a nameplate capacity 
equal to or greater than 25 MW that sell any amount of electricity as 
well as to non-EGUs that have a heat input capacity equal to or greater 
than 250 MMBtu per hour. Each NOX allowance permits a unit 
to emit one ton of NOX during the seasonal control period. 
NOX allowances may be bought or sold. Unused NOX 
allowances may also be banked for future use, with certain limitations. 
Owners will monitor their unit's NOX emissions by using 
systems that meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 75, subpart H and 
will report resulting data to EPA electronically. Each budget unit 
complies with the program by demonstrating at the end of each control 
period that actual emissions do not exceed the amount of allowances 
held for that period. However, regardless of the number of allowances a 
unit holds, it cannot emit at levels that would violate other federal 
or state limits, for example, reasonably available control technology 
(RACT), new source performance standards, or title IV (the Federal Acid 
Rain program).

C. What Is the Result of EPA's Evaluation of West Virginia's Program?

    EPA has evaluated West Virginia's May 1, 2002 SIP submittal and 
finds it approvable. The West Virginia NOX Budget Trading 
Program is consistent with EPA's guidance and addresses the 
requirements of the NOX SIP Call. EPA finds the 
NOX control measures in West Virginia's NOX 
Budget Trading Program and for the cement manufacturing kilns 
approvable. The May 1, 2002 submittal will strengthen West Virginia's 
SIP for reducing ground level ozone by providing NOX 
reductions beginning in 2004.
    West Virginia's SIP revision does not establish requirements for 
stationary internal combustion engines. West Virginia will be required 
to submit SIP revisions to address any additional emission reductions 
required to meet the State's overall emissions budget. In addition, 
West Virginia's submittal does not rely on any additional reductions 
beyond the anticipated federal measures in the mobile and area source 
categories.
    On December 26, 2000 (65 FR 81366), EPA made a finding that West 
Virginia had failed to submit a SIP response to the NOX SIP 
Call, thus starting 18 and 24 month clocks for the mandatory imposition 
of sanctions and the obligation for EPA to promulgate a Federal 
Implementation Plan (FIP) within 24 months. The effective date of that 
finding was January 25, 2001. On May 1, 2002, West Virginia submitted a 
SIP revision to satisfy the NOX SIP Call. EPA found that SIP 
submission complete on May 1, 2002, thus, halting the sanctions clocks 
and terminating EPA's FIP obligation.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving West Virginia's Rules 45CSR45 and 45CSR1, 
submitted as a SIP revision on May 1, 2002. EPA finds that West 
Virginia's NOX Budget Trading Program and the requirements 
for the cement manufacturing kilns are fully approvable because they 
satisfy the requirements of the NOX SIP Call. Approval of 
this SIP revision fully terminates both the sanctions clocks and EPA's 
FIP obligation which officially started on January 25, 2001, the 
effective date of EPA's December 26, 2000 finding (FR 65 81366).
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's 
Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve 
as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are 
filed. This rule will be effective on July 9, 2002 without further 
notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by June 10, 2002. If EPA 
receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take 
effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule 
based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so 
at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an 
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may 
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those 
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. General Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not 
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct 
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the 
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, 
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 
This

[[Page 31736]]

action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not 
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). 
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal 
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of 
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule 
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children 
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not 
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 9, 2002. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action approving West Virginia NOX 
Budget Trading Program as satisfying the NOX SIP Call may 
not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. 
(See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: May 1, 2002.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart XX--West Virginia

    2. Section 52.2520 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(46) to read 
as follows:


Sec. 52.2520  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (46) Revisions to the West Virginia Rules 45CSR26 and 45CSR1 
submitted on May 1, 2002 by the West Virginia Department of 
Environmental Protection:
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Letter of May 1, 2002 from the Secretary of the West Virginia 
Department of Environmental Protection transmitting rules 45CSR26 and 
45CSR1 to implement West Virginia's NOX Budget Trading 
Program and requirements for reductions in NOX emissions 
from cement manufacturing kilns.
    (B) West Virginia Rule Title 45 Series 26, ``Nitrogen Oxides Budget 
Trading Program as a Means of Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides 
from Electric Generating Units,'' consisting of sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 
6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 30, 31, 40, 41, 42, 43, 
50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, and 
76 effective May 1, 2002.
    (C) West Virginia Rule Title 45 Series 1, ``Nitrogen Oxides Budget 
Trading Program as a Means of Control and Reduction of Nitrogen 
Oxides,'' consisting of sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 
14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 30, 31, 40, 41, 42, 43, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 
56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 
86, 87, 88, and 100, effective May 1, 2002.
    (ii) Additional Material--Other materials submitted by the State of 
West Virginia in support of and pertaining to Rules 45CSR26 and 45CSR1 
listed in paragraphs (c)(46)(i)(B) and (C) of this section.

[FR Doc. 02-11722 Filed 5-9-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P