[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30599-30602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-11291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL-7205-9]


Utah: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Immediate final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Utah has applied to EPA for Final authorization of the changes 
to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that these changes satisfy all 
requirements needed to qualify for Final authorization and is 
authorizing the State's changes through this immediate final action. We 
are publishing this rule to authorize the changes without a prior 
proposal because we believe this action is not controversial. Unless we 
receive written comments which oppose this authorization during the 
comment period, the decision to authorize Utah's changes to their 
hazardous waste program will take effect. If we receive comments that 
oppose this action, we will publish a document in the Federal Register 
withdrawing this rule before it takes effect, and a separate document 
in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register will serve as a 
proposal to authorize the changes.

DATES: This Final authorization will become effective on July 8, 2002 
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by June 6, 2002. If EPA 
receives such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal of this 
Immediate Final Rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that 
this authorization will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Kris Shurr, 8P-HW, U.S. EPA, Region 
VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466, phone 
number: (303) 312-6139. Copies of the Utah program revision 
applications and the materials which EPA used in evaluating the 
revisions are available for inspection and copying at the following 
locations: EPA Region VIII, from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, 999 18th Street, 
Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466, contact: Kris Shurr, phone 
number: (303) 312-6139 or Utah Department of Environmental Quality 
(UDEQ), from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, 288 North 1460 West, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84114-4880, contact: Susan Toronto, phone number: (801) 538-6776.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris Shurr, 8P-HW, U.S. EPA, Region 
VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466, phone 
number: (303) 312-6139.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?

    States which have received Final authorization from EPA under RCRA 
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste 
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent 
than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes, States must 
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to 
State programs may be necessary when Federal or State statutory or 
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur. 
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes to 
EPA's regulations in 40 Code

[[Page 30600]]

of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 
and 279.

B. What Decisions Have We Made in This Rule?

    We conclude that Utah's application to revise its authorized 
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements 
established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant Utah Final authorization to 
operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in the 
authorization application. Utah has responsibility for permitting 
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its borders, 
except in Indian Country, and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA 
program described in its revised program application, subject to the 
limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). 
New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal 
regulations that EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA take 
effect in authorized States before they are authorized for the 
requirements. Thus, EPA will implement those requirements and 
prohibitions in Utah, including issuing permits, until the State is 
granted authorization to do so.

C. What Is the Effect of Today's Authorization Decision?

    This decision means that a facility in Utah subject to RCRA will 
now have to comply with the authorized State requirements instead of 
the equivalent Federal requirements in order to comply with RCRA. Utah 
has enforcement responsibilities under its State hazardous waste 
program for violations of such program, but EPA retains its authority 
under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, which include, among 
others, authority to:
     Do inspections, and require monitoring, tests, analyses or 
reports;
     Enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits;
     And take enforcement actions regardless of whether the 
State has taken its own actions.
    This action does not impose additional requirements on the 
regulated community because the regulations for which Utah is being 
authorized by today's action are already effective and are not changed 
by today's action.

D. Why Wasn't There a Proposed Rule Before Today's Rule?

    EPA did not publish a proposal before today's rule because we view 
this as a routine program change. We are providing an opportunity for 
the public to comment now. In addition to this rule, in the proposed 
rules section of today's Federal Register we are publishing a separate 
document that proposes to authorize the State program changes.

E. What Happens if EPA Receives Comments That Oppose This Action?

    If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we will 
withdraw this rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register 
before the rule becomes effective. EPA will base any further decision 
on the authorization of the State program changes on the proposal 
mentioned in the previous paragraph. We will then address all public 
comments in a later final rule. You may not have another opportunity to 
comment. If you want to comment on this authorization, you must do so 
at this time.
    If we receive comments that oppose only the authorization of a 
particular change to the State hazardous waste program, we will 
withdraw that part of this rule but the authorization of the program 
changes that the comments do not oppose will become effective on the 
date specified above. The Federal Register withdrawal document will 
specify which part of the authorization will become effective, and 
which part is being withdrawn.

F. What Has Utah Previously Been Authorized for?

    Utah initially received Final Authorization on October 10, 1984, 
effective October 24, 1984 (49 FR 39683) to implement its base 
hazardous waste management program. Utah received authorization for 
revisions to its program on February 21, 1989 (54 FR 7417), effective 
March 7, 1989; May 23, 1991 (56 FR 23648) and August 6, 1991 (56 FR 
37291), both effective July 22, 1991; May 15, 1992 (57 FR 20770), 
effective July 14, 1992; February 12, 1993 (58 FR 8232) and May 5, 1993 
(58 FR 26689), both effective April 13, 1993; October 14, 1994 (59 FR 
52084), effective December 13, 1994; May 20, 1997 (62 FR 27501), 
effective July 21, 1997; January 13, 1999 (64 FR 02144), effective 
March 15, 1999; and October 16, 2000 (65 FR 61109), effective January 
16, 2001.

G. What Changes Are We Authorizing With Today's Action?

    On April 4, 2000, Utah submitted a final complete program revision 
application, seeking authorization of their changes in accordance with 
40 CFR 271.21. We now make an immediate final decision, subject to 
receipt of written comments that oppose this action, that Utah's 
hazardous waste program revision satisfies all of the requirements 
necessary to qualify for Final authorization. Therefore, we grant Utah 
Final authorization for the following program changes (the Federal 
Citation followed by the analog from the Utah Administrative Code 
(R315), revised September 20, 2001): Clarification of Standards for 
Hazardous Waste LDR Treatment Variances [62 FR 64504, 12/05/97] 
(Checklist 162)/R315-13-1; Organic Air Emission Standards for Tanks, 
Surface Impoundments, & Containers [62 FR 64636, 12/08/97] (Checklist 
163)/R315-3-2.5(b)(5); R315-7-9.6(b); R315-7-12.4; R315-7-26; R315-7-
27; R315-7-30; R315-50-17; R315-8-2.6(b)(4); R315-8-5.3; R315-817, 
R315-8-18; R315-8-22; Kraft Mill Steam Stripper Condensate Exclusion 
[63 FR 18504, 04/15/98] (Checklist 164)/R315-2-4(a)(15); Land Disposal 
Restrictions Phase IV--Treatment Standards for Metal Wastes & Mineral 
Processing Wastes [63 FR 28556, 05/26/98] (Checklist 167A)/R315-13-1; 
Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Hazardous Soils Treatment 
Standards & Exclusions [63 FR 28556, 05/26/98] (Checklist 167B)/R315-
13-1; Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV--Corrections [63 FR 28556, 
05/26/98] (Checklist 167C)/R315-13-1; R315-13-1; Mineral Processing 
Secondary Materials Exclusion [63 FR 28556, 05/26/98] (Checklist 167D)/
R315-2-2(c)(1)(i); R315-2-2(c)(3); R315-2-2(e)(1)(iii); R315-2-
4(a)(16); Bevill Exclusion Revisions & Clarifications [63 FR 28556, 05/
26/98] (Checklist 167E)/R315-2-3(a)(2); R315-2-4(b)(7); Exclusion of 
Recycled Wood Preserving Wastewaters [63 FR 28556, 05/26/98] (Checklist 
167F)/R315-2-4(a)(9); Hazardous Waste Combustors Revised Standards [63 
FR 33782, 06/19/98] (Checklist 168)/R315-2-4(a)(17); R315-2-26; R315-3-
4.3; Petroleum Refining Process Wastes [63 FR 42110, 08/06/98] 
(Checklist 169)/R315-2-3(a)(2)(iv)(C); R315-2-3(c)(2)(ii)(B); 2-
3(c)(2)(ii)(E); R315-2-4(a)(12); R315-2-4(a)(18); R315-2-4(a)(19); 
R315-2-6; R315-210; R315-13-1; R315-14-7; R315-50-9; Land Disposal 
Restrictions Phase IV--Zinc Micronutrient Fertilizers, Amendment [63 FR 
46332, 08/31/98] (Checklist 170)/R315-13-1; Land Disposal Restrictions 
Phase IV--Extension of Compliance Date for Characteristic Slags [63 FR 
48124, 09/09/98] (Checklist 172)/R315-13-1; Land Disposal Restrictions; 
Treatment Standards for Spent Potliners from Primary Aluminum Reduction 
(K088); Final Rule [63 FR 51254, 09/24/98] (Checklist 173)/R315-13-1; 
Post-Closure Permit Requirement & Closure

[[Page 30601]]

Process [63 FR 56710, 10/22/98] (Checklist 174)/R315-3-1.1; R315-3-
2.5(a); R315-3-2.19; R315-7-13.1; R315-7-14; R315-7-15; R315-8-6.1; 
R315-8-7; R315-8-8; Universal Waste Rule--Technical Amendments [63 FR 
71225] (Checklist 176)/R315-14-6; R315-16-1.9(j); Organic Air Emission 
Standards: Clarification and Technical Amendments [64 FR 03382] 
(Checklist 177)/R315-5-3.34; R315-7-30; R315-8-17; R315-8-22; Petroleum 
Refining Process Wastes-Leachate Exemption [64 FR 06806] (Checklist 
178)/R315-2-4(b)(15).

H. Where Are the Revised State Rules Different From the Federal 
Rules?

    In the Federal Register on October 16, 2000 [65 FR 61109, effective 
January 16, 2001], we listed several places where we consider the State 
requirements to be more stringent than the Federal requirements. R315-
5-10 was inadvertently left off the list of citations where the State 
requires notification also be given to the Utah Division of Solid and 
Hazardous Waste, as well as, the Federal entities. These requirements 
are part of Utah's authorized program and are Federally enforceable.

I. Who Handles Permits After the Authorization Takes Effect?

    Utah will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is 
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue 
to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits 
which we issued prior to the effective date of this authorization until 
Utah has equivalent instruments in place. We will not issue any new 
permits or new portions of permits for the provisions listed in the 
Item G after the effective date of this authorization. EPA has 
previously suspended issuance of permits for other provisions on the 
effective date of Utah's Final Authorization for the RCRA base program 
and each of the revisions listed at Item F. EPA will continue to 
implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which Utah is not 
yet authorized.

J. How Does Today's Action Affect Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) 
in Utah?

    This program revision does not extend to ``Indian Country'' as 
defined in 18 U.S.C. Section 1151. Indian Country includes lands within 
the exterior boundaries of the following Indian reservations located 
within or abutting the State of Utah:

1. Goshute Indian Reservation
2. Navajo Indian Reservation
3. Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation of Utah (Washakie) Indian 
Reservation
4. Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Indian Reservation
5. Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Utah Indian Reservation
6. Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (see below)
7. Ute Mountain Indian Reservation

    With respect to the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation, Federal 
courts have determined that certain lands within the exterior 
boundaries of the Reservation do not constitute Indian Country. This 
State program revision approval will extend to those lands which the 
courts have determined are not Indian Country.
    In excluding Indian Country from the scope of this program 
revision, EPA is not making a determination that the State either has 
adequate jurisdiction or lacks jurisdiction over sources in Indian 
Country. Should the State of Utah choose to seek program authorization 
within Indian Country, it may do so without prejudice. Before EPA would 
approve the State's program for any portion of Indian Country, EPA 
would have to be satisfied that the State has authority, either 
pursuant to explicit Congressional authorization or applicable 
principles of Federal Indian law, to enforce its laws against existing 
and potential pollution sources within any geographical area for which 
it seeks program approval and that such approval would constitute sound 
administrative practice.

K. What Is Codification and Is EPA Codifying Utah's Hazardous Waste 
Program as Authorized in This Rule?

    Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and 
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste 
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. We do this by referencing 
the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the amendment 
of 40 CFR part 272, subpart TT for the codification of Utah's program 
until a later date.

L. Administrative Requirements

    The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from 
the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 
1993), and therefore this action is not subject to review by OMB. This 
action authorizes State requirements for the purpose of RCRA 3006 and 
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. 
Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action 
authorizes pre-existing requirements under State law and does not 
impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State 
law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). For the same reason, 
this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
communities of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 
13084 (63 FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This action will not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as 
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), 
because it merely authorizes State requirements as part of the State 
RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the 
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This 
action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and it does not 
make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks.
    Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a State's application for 
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA. 
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it 
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any 
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard 
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required 
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), 
in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate 
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and 
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied 
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining 
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney 
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and 
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order. 
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).

[[Page 30602]]

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this document and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect 
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This 
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This 
action will be effective July 8, 2002.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections 
2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended 
42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).

    Dated: April 26, 2002.
Jack W. McGraw,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 02-11291 Filed 5-6-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P