[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 77 (Monday, April 22, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19546-19550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-9802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-848]


Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of 
China; Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 12, 2001, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of its administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat 
from the People's Republic of China (PRC). See Freshwater Crawfish Tail 
Meat from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Partial 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 66 FR 52100 
(October 12, 2001). The administrative review covers the period 
September 1, 1999, through August 31, 2000.
    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made 
changes to the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ 
from the preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping 
margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled 
``Final Results of Review.''

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 22, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Campau or Maureen Flannery; 
Office of Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Enforcement VII, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230;

[[Page 19547]]

telephone (202) 482-1395 or (202) 482-3020, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
references to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). In 
addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department's 
regulations are to the provisions codified at 19 CFR part 351 (2000).

Background

    On October 12, 2001, the Department published, in the Federal 
Register, the preliminary results of the antidumping duty 
administrative review on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the PRC. 
See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 66 FR 52100 (October 12, 2001). Since the publication of the 
preliminary results, the following events have occurred. On October 29, 
2001, Ningbo Nanlian Frozen Foods Company, Ltd. (Ningbo Nanlian) and 
Louisiana Packing Company submitted a study on the Spanish crawfish 
industry published by the Government of Andalucia, Spain. On November 
1, 2001, Ningbo Nanlian and Louisiana Packing Company, Fujian Pelagic 
Fishery Group Co. (Fujian Pelagic), Qingdao Zhengri Seafood Company, 
Ltd. (Qingdao Zhengri), Yangzhou Lakebest Co. Ltd. (Lakebest), Qingdao 
Rirong Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Qingdao Rirong), Yancheng Haiteng Aquatic 
Products & Foods Co., Ltd. (Haiteng), and Suquian Foreign Trade Co., 
Ltd. (Suquian FTC), submitted timely information on surrogate values. 
The Crawfish Processors Alliance, the petitioners, as well as the 
Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry and Bob Odom, 
Commissioner, also submitted timely information on proposed surrogate 
values on November 1, 2001. On November 27, 2001, we received timely 
case briefs from the following respondents: Lakebest, Qingdao Rirong, 
Haiteng, and Suqian FTC (collectively, Lakebest et al); Fujian Pelagic, 
Huaiyin 30, Yancheng Foreign Trade, Ltd. (YFT), and Yancheng Yaou 
(collectively Fujian Pelagic et al); Ningbo Nanlian and Louisiana 
Packing Company; and Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corporation (5) (Huaiyin 5), 
renamed Jiangsu Hilong International Trading Company Ltd., subsequent 
to the POR (Jiangsu Hilong). We also received comments from 
petitioners.
    On December 4, 2001, we received rebuttal briefs from Lakebest, et 
al; Ningbo Nanlian and Louisiana Packing Company; and petitioners.
    During the week of February 25, 2002, the Department sent a team to 
Spain to discuss with government and industry officials the study of 
the Spanish freshwater crawfish industry printed by the Junta de 
Andalucia, Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca (Government of Andalucia, 
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (the Spanish Study).
    On March 12, 2002, the Department released its reports regarding 
these meetings to all interested parties. We received comments from 
parties on March 19, 2002, and rebuttals on March 21, 2002.
    Both petitioner and certain respondents submitted untimely new 
factual information in their surrogate value submissions, in comments 
on the Department's Spain trip reports, or in their briefs. We rejected 
this new factual information pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2) and 
(c)(3) and requested that the parties refile their comments on the 
Department's Spain trip reports, surrogate value submissions, and 
briefs, which they did on March 21, 2002, April 1, 2002, and April 2, 
2002, respectively. On March 21, 2002, April 1, 2002, and April 5, 
2002, objections were filed by either petitioner or the respondent 
party concerning the Department's return of the untimely new factual 
information. We addressed the comments concerning the Department's 
decision to reject these submissions in two separate memos to the file: 
``Memorandum to the File Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from The 
People's Republic of China: Rejection of New Factual Information 
Submitted By Petitioner''and ``Memorandum to the File Freshwater 
Crawfish Tail Meat from The People's Republic of China: Rejection of 
New Factual Information Submitted By Ningbo Nanlian'' (dated April 10, 
2002).
    On March 22, 2002, the Department conducted a public hearing on the 
issues presented by interested parties in their case and rebuttal 
briefs.
    The Department has now completed this review in accordance with 
section 751 of the Act.

Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order

    The product covered by the antidumping duty order is freshwater 
crawfish tail meat, in all its forms (whether washed or with fat on, 
whether purged or unpurged), grades, and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, 
or chilled; and regardless of how it is packed, preserved, or prepared. 
Excluded from the scope of the order are live crawfish and other whole 
crawfish, whether boiled, frozen, fresh, or chilled. Also excluded are 
saltwater crawfish of any type, and parts thereof. Freshwater crawfish 
tail meat is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (HTS) under item numbers 1605.40.10.10, 
1605.40.10.90, 0306.19.00.10 and 0306.29.00.00. The HTS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and Customs purposes only. The written 
description of the scope of this order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum from Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration, Group III, to Faryar Shirzad, Assistant 
Secretary for Import Administration: Issues and Decision Memorandum for 
the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: 
September 1, 1999 through August 31, 2000, dated April 10, 2002 
(Decision Memo), which is hereby adopted by this notice.
    A list of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have 
responded, all of which are in the Decision Memo, is attached to this 
notice as an appendix. Parties can find a complete discussion of all 
issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in 
this public memorandum which is on file in the Central Records Unit, 
room B-099 of the main Commerce Building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Decision Memo can be accessed directly on the Web at 
http://ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy and electronic version of the 
Decision Memo are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made certain 
changes in the margin calculations. We have also corrected certain 
clerical errors from our preliminary results. Finally, for packing 
materials, we are using updated Indian import statistics for the period 
April 2000 through January 2001. See the April 10, 2002 memorandum 
entitled ``Packing Material Surrogates Used for the Final Results of 
the 1999-2000 Administrative Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat 
from the People's Republic of China.'' For a discussion of the issues 
and changes made for each company, refer to the Decision Memo.

[[Page 19548]]

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    In our preliminary results, we concluded that YFT did not have any 
sales to the United States during the period of review, and thus was 
not entitled to a review under section 751(a) of the Act. For a further 
discussion of this issue, see the relevant sections of the Decision 
Memo; see also Memorandum to Barbara E. Tillman through Maureen 
Flannery from Elfi Blum: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC); Yancheng Foreign Trade, Ltd. (YFT), 
formerly Yancheng Foreign Trade Corporation (YFTC): Intent to Rescind 
Administrative Review (September 24, 2001). After reviewing the 
comments received with respect to YFT, we have concluded that our 
preliminary determination was appropriate because YFT had no sales to 
the United States during the POR. Therefore, we are rescinding the 
administrative review of YFT.
    Furthermore, we did not receive any comments regarding our 
preliminary decision to rescind the review with respect to Anhui Chaohu 
Daxin Meat Poultry Co, Ltd.; Anhui Provincial Aquatic Co.; Baoluu 
Waterstuff Co., Ltd.; Baoying Freezing Plant; Baoying County Freezing 
Plant; Beijing Farenco; Ever Concord; Feidong Freezing Plant; Fubao 
Aquatic Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; Fujian Hualong Aquatic Trade Development 
Co. Lianjian Seafood Processing Plant; Fujian Hualong Aquatic Trade 
Development; Funing County Frozen Food; Guangzhou Xinye Plastic 
Products; Hengji Trading Co., Ltd.; Hexing Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; Hongze 
County Laoshan Danxian Freezing Factory; Hongze Lake Green Food Co., 
Ltd.; Hongze County Aquatic Freezing Factory; Hua Yin; Huai Yin; 
Huaiyin County Freezing Factory; Huaiyin Foreign Economic Relations and 
Trade Committee; Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. Shunda Branch; Huaiyin 
Foreign Trade Corporation; Huaiyin Foreign Trading; Huaiyin Luky Trade 
Corp.; Huaiyin Shunda Economic and Technology Trading Co.; JAS 
Forwarding; Jiangsu Zhenfeng Group Foodstuff; Jiangsu Zhenfeng Group; 
Jiangsu Lukang Foodstuffs; Jin Hu Foreign Trading; Jinghu Aquatic 
Foodstuff Processing Plant; Jinpeng Agriculture and By-Product 
Development Co.; Laoshan Brother Freezing Plant; Liaoning Limeng 
Exports & Imports; Neptune International; Panwin Logistics; Qidong 
Baoluu Aquatic Food Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Shun Hang Forwarding; Qingshan 
Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; Rich Shipping; Seatrade International, aka 
Seatrade Enter.; Shanghai Guangxum Trading; Toyo Warehouse, aka TKK 
Toyo; Weishan Jinmuan Foodstuff; Y & Z International, aka Y & Z 
International Trading; Yancheng Baolong Biochemical Products, Co., 
Ltd.; Yancheng Haibao Foods; Mr. Yang Yi Xiang; Yangzhou Foreign 
Trading; Yiaxian No. 2 Freezing Factory; Yundong Aquatic Products 
Processing Factory; Yundong Waterstuff Processing Plant; Zegao Daxin 
Foodstuff Freezing Plant; Zegao Foodstuff Freezing Plant; Zhenfeng 
Foodstuff Co.; Zhenfeng Group Food Co.; Ocean Harvest and Nantong Delu; 
Anhui Cereals, Oils & Foodstuffs; Fujian Hualong Aquatic Trade 
Development Co. Lianjian Seafood Processing Plant; Huaiyin Foreign 
Trade Corporation (1); Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corporation (3); Mr. 
Edward Lee; Lianyungang Haiwang Aquatic Products Co., Ltd.; Mr. Lin 
Zhong Nan; Mr. Ma Guo Zhong; Pacific Coast Fisheries Corp.; Shanghai 
Zhongjian International Trading; Suyang Shuangyu Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; 
Mr. Wei Wei, aka Philip Wei; Mr. Wei Zhang, aka Zhang Wei; Weishan 
Hongfa Lake Foodstuff Co., Ltd., aka Weishan Fongfa Lake Foodstuff; 
Yancheng Fubao Aquatic Food Co., Ltd.; and Mr. Yang Yi Xiang. 
Therefore, we are rescinding the review with respect to these 
companies.
    In the preliminary results, the Department determined that Qingdao 
Zhengri and Yancheng Seafood should be treated as a single entity for 
purposes of this administrative review. Qingdao Zhengri and Yancheng 
Seafood's consolidated supplemental response states that Yancheng 
Seafood negotiates the price with U.S. customers on behalf of Qingdao 
Zhengri, and that Qingdao Zhengri receives payment for such sales. The 
sales for which Qingdao Zhengri produced the merchandise account for a 
significant portion of Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng Seafood's reported U.S. 
sales. We also note that in their response to the Department's 
questionnaire, the total volume and value of sales for both Qingdao 
Zhengri and Yancheng Seafood were consolidated in Yancheng Seafood's 
section A response. See Yancheng Seafood's January 22, 2001, response 
to section A of the Department's questionnaire. Furthermore, the 
companies submitted a consolidated response to sections C and D of the 
Department's questionnaire, and to the Department's supplemental 
questionnaire for sections A, C, and D. See Yancheng Seafood and 
Qingdao Zhengri's July 23, 2001, response to the Department's 
supplemental questionnaire. For the reasons cited above, the Department 
is treating these two companies as a single entity for these final 
results.
    In the preliminary results, the Department erroneously stated that 
it was preliminarily rescinding the review of Fujian Pelagic. To 
clarify, the Department has conducted an administrative review of 
Fujian Pelagic for this POR.

Determination to Apply Facts Available

    The Department received no comments on its preliminary 
determination to apply facts available to Shantou SEZ Yangfeng Marine 
Products Co. (Yangfeng Marine). Therefore, we have not altered our 
decision to apply facts available to Yangfeng Marine for these final 
results of review.
    Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides that if any interested party: 
(A) withholds information that has been requested by the Department; 
(B) fails to provide such information in a timely manner or in the form 
or manner requested; (C) significantly impedes an antidumping 
investigation; or (D) provides such information but the information 
cannot be verified, as provided in section 782(i) of the Act, the 
Department shall, subject to section 782(d) of the Act, use the facts 
otherwise available in reaching the applicable determination under this 
title.
    Yangfeng Marine failed to respond to sections C and D of the 
Department's questionnaire. As a result, we were unable to obtain the 
information necessary to conduct a review. Therefore, in accordance 
with section 776(a)(2)(A) of the Act, we are applying facts available 
to Yangfeng Marine. See, e.g., Silicon Metal from the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 63 FR 37850 (July 14, 1998); and Silicon Metal From the 
People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 63 FR 37850 (July 14, 1998). Because Yangfeng 
Marine failed to provide section C and D questionnaire responses on the 
record, section 782(d) does not apply. Further, absent these sections, 
the Department cannot calculate export price or normal value, and thus 
any remaining information cannot form the basis for this determination 
under section 782(e). Therefore, in accordance with section 776(a)(2), 
we are applying facts available to Yangfeng Marine.
    As noted above, we have determined that Qingdao Zhengri and 
Yancheng Seafood should be treated as a single entity. Since Qingdao 
Zhengri did not allow verification of its portion of the

[[Page 19549]]

consolidated response, the Department considers the whole of the 
consolidated response to be unverifiable. Therefore, in accordance with 
section 776(a)(2)(D) of the Act, we are applying facts available to 
Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng Seafood. For a discussion of why we are 
continuing to apply facts available to Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng Yaou 
Seafood (Yancheng Seafood), see the Decision Memo at Comment 18.
    Section 776(b) of the Act provides that the Department may apply 
adverse facts available to a respondent when that respondent fails to 
cooperate to the best of its ability. As noted above, in the instant 
administrative review, Yangfeng Marine and Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng 
Seafood failed to provide complete and/or verifiable responses. With 
respect to Yangfeng Marine, this company failed to provide full section 
C and D questionnaire responses. These responses are necessary for the 
Department to calculate an accurate margin. Without section C and D 
information, the record is devoid of information concerning U.S. sales 
and factors of production. At no time did Yangfeng Marine indicate to 
the Department that it was having difficulties complying with the 
Department's requests for information, nor did it seek assistance from 
the Department. Therefore, we conclude that Yangfeng Marine has failed 
to cooperate in this review.
    With respect to Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng Seafood, after the 
Department received a letter from Qingdao Zhengri indicating that it 
would not submit to verification, the Department issued Qingdao 
Zhengri/Yancheng Seafood a letter indicating that it would not be 
possible for the Department to verify only parts of the companies' 
consolidated response. The letter pointed out that if a company objects 
to verification, the Department will not conduct verification and may 
disregard any or all information submitted by the company in favor of 
the use of the facts available. Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng Seafood never 
responded to the Department's letter, and made no subsequent efforts to 
contact or arrange verification with the Department. Therefore, we 
determine that these entities did not cooperate by acting to the best 
of their ability in complying with the Department's requests for 
information.
    We are treating all the above companies, together with all other 
PRC companies that have not established that they are entitled to 
separate rates, as a single enterprise subject to government control. 
Furthermore, we have determined the rate to be applied to this single 
enterprise is a PRC-wide rate based on adverse facts available, in 
accordance with section 776(b) of the Act. Section 776(b) of the Act 
states that adverse facts available may include information derived 
from the petition, the final determination, a previous administrative 
review, or other information placed on the record. As adverse facts 
available, we are using the rate of 223.01 percent for Huaiyin 30, the 
highest calculated rate in this segment of the proceeding, which is 
also the highest rate from any segment of the proceeding.
    We received documentation from the U.S. Customs service regarding 
entries of crawfish tail meat made during the POR. On January 11, 2002, 
we sent letters to Huaiyin 5 and Huaiyin 30, stating that entry 
documentation indicated entries of merchandise exported by them during 
the POR that had not been reported by them to the Department, or that 
had been reported differently than shown on the Customs documentation. 
These respondents indicated that certain entries of crawfish tail meat 
during the POR purported to have been exported by respondents were not, 
in fact, exported by them. See letter to the Department from Huaiyin 5, 
dated January 18, 2002; letter to the Department from Huaiyin 5, dated 
January 25, 2002; letter to the Department from Ningbo Nanlian, dated 
January 25, 2002 (in support of Huaiyin 5); and letter to the 
Department from Huaiyin 30, dated January 16, 2002. The details of 
these letters and the identity of the importer(s), which Huaiyin 5 and 
Huaiyin 30 deny they ever exported to, are proprietary; however, based 
on the information certified by Ningbo Nanlian, Huaiyin 5, and Huaiyin 
30, we conclude that these are entries of subject merchandise from an 
exporter that does not have a separate rate, and will instruct the 
Customs Service to liquidate these entries at the PRC-wide rate.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average margins exist for 
the period September 1, 1999 through August 31, 2000:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Manufacturer/Exporter                            Time Period            Margin (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ningbo Nanlian/ Huaiyin5 (a.k.a. Jiangsu Hilong International            9/1/99-8/31/00            62.51 percent
 Trading Company, Ltd.).......................................
Yancheng Haiteng..............................................           9/1/99-8/31/00            65.81 percent
Huaiyin 30....................................................           9/1/99-8/31/00           223.01 percent
Fujian Pelagic................................................           9/1/99-8/31/00           174.04 percent
Yangzhou Lakebest.............................................           9/1/99-8/31/00            41.93 percent
Suqian FTC....................................................           9/1/99-8/31/00            41.41 percent
Qingdao Rirong................................................           9/1/99-8/31/00             9.76 percent
Nantong Shengfa...............................................           9/1/99-8/31/00            45.40 percent
PRC-Wide Rate.................................................           9/1/99-8/31/00           223.01 percent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment of Antidumping Duties

    Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall 
determine, and the U.S. Customs Service shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries. The Department will issue 
appraisement instructions directly to the U.S. Customs Service. For 
assessment purposes, where possible, we calculated importer-specific 
assessment rates for freshwater crawfish tail meat from the PRC. We 
divided the total dumping margins (calculated as the difference between 
normal value and export price or constructed export price) for each 
exporter/importer by the total quantity of subject merchandise sold by 
that exporter to that importer during the POR. Upon the completion of 
this review, we will direct Customs to multiply the resulting quantity-
based rates by the weight in kilograms of each entry of the subject 
merchandise on an importer-specific basis for the POR.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of these final results for this administrative review for 
all shipments of freshwater crawfish tail meat from the PRC entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of 
publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 
exporters with separate rates listed above, we will establish a per 
kilogram cash deposit

[[Page 19550]]

rate which will be equivalent to the company-specific cash deposit 
established in this review except that, for firms whose weighted-
average margins are less than 0.5 percent and therefore de minimis, the 
Department shall require no deposit of estimated antidumping duties; 
(2) for previously-reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters with separate 
rates, the cash deposit rate will be the company-specific rate 
established for the most recent period; (3) for all other PRC 
exporters, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate, 223.01 
percent; and (4) for all other non-PRC exporters of the subject 
merchandise, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the 
PRC supplier of that exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain 
in effect until publication of the final results of the next 
administrative review.
    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and subsequent assessment 
of double antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the Department's 
regulations. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: April 10, 2002.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.

APPENDIX

List of Issues
Comment 1: Use of Australia Bureau of Agriculture and Resource 
Economics (ABARE) Statistics or Mulataga Information to Value Live 
Crawfish
Comment 2: Whether the Spanish Study is a Reliable Source of Live 
Crawfish Prices and Represents the Best Available Information
Comment 3: Size and Weight of Live Spanish Crawfish
Comment 4: Whether Crawfish Capture in Spain Is Performed with Unbaited 
Nets
Comment 5: Whether Spanish Crawfish Prices Are Aberrational
Comment 6: Similarity of Spanish GDP to That of China
Comment 7: The Spain Trip Versus the Australia and Mexico Trips
Comment 8: Use of Mexican Data as a Surrogate Value for Whole, Live 
Crawfish
Comment 9: Comparability of Economies
Comment 10: Suggested Wet-Dry Weight Conversion Factor for Crawfish 
Scrap, Based on Information from an Indian Chitosan Producer
Comment 11: The Appropriate Factor for Use in Calculating a Wet-Dry 
Conversion Factor
Comment 12: Suggested Wet-Dry Weight Conversion Ratio of 50 Percent for 
Crawfish Scrap
Comment 13: Incorporation of a Wet-Dry Weight Conversion Factor for 
Scrap for Yangzhou Lakebest (Lakebest)
Comment 14: Suqian's Wet-Dry Conversion
Comment 15: Suqian's and Yancheng Haiteng's Coal Freight Expense
Comment 16: Rescission of Review for Yancheng Foreign Trade, Ltd. (YFT)
Comment 17: The Department's Refusal to Review Certain Sales of Huaiyin 
Foreign Trade Corporation (30) (Huaiyin 30)
Comment 18: Whether the Department Improperly Determined that Fujian 
Pelagic and Pacific Coast are not Affiliated Parties
Comment 19: Whether the Department Improperly Applied Facts Available 
to Yancheng Yaou
Comment 20: Single Rate for Huaiyin 5 and Ningbo Nanlian
Comment 21: Yancheng Haiteng's Indirect Selling Expenses Ratio
Comment 22: Yancheng Haiteng's Marine Insurance Factor
Comment 23: Certain Domestic Parties' Status as Interested Parties
Application of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 
(Byrd Amendment)
[FR Doc. 02-9802 Filed 4-19-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S