[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16016-16018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-8079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD01-01-181]
RIN 2115-AE84 and 2115-AA97


Regulated Navigation Area and Safety and Security Zones; New York 
Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the effective period of the 
regulated navigation area (RNA) and safety and security zones published 
October 10, 2001. This change will extend the effective date of the 
temporary final rule until August 15, 2002, allowing adequate time for 
informal rulemaking to develop a permanent rule. This rule will 
continue to prohibit vessels from entering certain areas of the port 
and

[[Page 16017]]

impose restrictions on vessel operations in other areas.

DATES: Sections 165.T01-165 and 165.T01-166 added at 66 FR 15161 
effective September 28, 2001 through April 8, 2002 are extended in 
effect through August 15, 2002. Sections 165.T01-165(c) and 165.T01-
166(b) are revised effective April 4, 2002 and will remain effective 
until August 15, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Documents as indicated in this preamble are available for 
inspection and copying at Coast Guard Activities New York, 212 Coast 
Guard Drive, room 204, Staten Island, New York 10305, between 8 a.m. 
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant M. Day, Waterways Oversight 
Branch, Coast Guard Activities New York (718) 354-4012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On October 10, 2001, we published a temporary final rule (TFR) 
entitled ``Regulated Navigation Area and Safety and Security Zones; New 
York Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone'' in the 
Federal Register (66 FR 51558-51562). The effective period for this 
rule was from September 28, 2001, through April 8, 2002. Although the 
rule was published without advance notice of proposed rulemaking, an 
opportunity for public comment was provided. The comment period closed 
on December 10, 2001. The Coast Guard received no letters commenting on 
the temporary rule. No public hearing was requested, and none was held.
    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The original TFR was urgently 
required to facilitate emergency services responding to terrorist 
attacks upon the World Trade Center in Manhattan, NY, and to prevent 
future terrorist strikes within and adjacent to the Port of New York/
New Jersey.
    It was anticipated that we would assess the security environment at 
the end of the effective period to determine whether continuing 
security precautions were required and, if so, to propose regulations 
responsive to existing conditions. We have determined the need for 
continued security regulations exists. The Coast Guard will utilize the 
extended effective period of this TFR to engage in notice and comment 
rulemaking to develop permanent regulations tailored to the present and 
foreseeable security environment within the Port of New York.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. The measures contemplated by the 
rule were intended to facilitate ongoing response efforts and prevent 
future terrorist attack. The Coast Guard will be publishing a NPRM to 
establish permanent safety and security zones that are temporarily 
effective under this rule. This revision preserves the status quo 
within the Port while permanent rules are developed. There is no 
indication that the present TFR has been burdensome on the maritime 
public. The public was invited to comment upon or suggest modifications 
to the scope of the existing TFR by submitting written comments within 
60 days of its publication in the Federal Register. None were received.

Background and Purpose

    Terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center in Manhattan, New 
York on September 11, 2001 inflicted catastrophic human casualties and 
property damage. Federal, state and local personnel are engaged in 
ongoing efforts to secure other potential terrorist targets from 
attack. The Coast Guard established regulated navigation areas (RNAs) 
and safety and security zones within defined areas of water in order to 
facilitate emergency response and rescue activities, protect human 
life, and safeguard vessels and waterfront facilities from sabotage or 
terrorist attacks.
    As we mentioned in the original TFR, these regulations were 
designed to provide the Captain of the Port of New York with maximum 
flexibility to respond to emergent threats and dangerous conditions. 
When less stringent security measures are required, the Captain of the 
Port communicates relaxed enforcement policies to the public. As a 
result, the full scope of these regulations is rarely imposed. 
Nevertheless, the flexibility to utilize those measures permitted by 
the TFR and required by the circumstances is vital to ensure port 
security in the present environment.
    The temporary rule is only effective until April 8, 2002. The Coast 
Guard is extending the effective date of this rule until August 15, 
2002, to allow the establishment of permanent safety and security zones 
by notice and comment rulemaking.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12886, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation 
(DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979).
    The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this final rule to 
be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of 
the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary. This 
finding is based on the sizes of the zones are the minimum necessary to 
provide adequate protection for the public, vessels, and vessel crews. 
Any vessels seeking entry into or movement within the safety and 
security zones must request permission from the Captain of the Port or 
his authorized patrol representative. Any hardships experienced by 
persons or vessels are considered minimal compared to the national 
interest protecting the public, vessels, and vessel crews from the 
further devastating consequences of the aforementioned acts of 
terrorism, and from potential future sabotage or other subversive acts, 
accidents, or other causes of a similar nature.
    The Coast Guard will be publishing a NPRM to establish permanent 
safety and security zones that are temporarily effective under this 
rule.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    For the reasons addressed under the Regulatory Evaluation above, 
the Coast Guard expects the impact of this regulation to be minimal and 
certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601-612) that this final rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Maritime 
advisories will be initiated by normal methods and means and will be 
widely available to users of the area.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121),

[[Page 16018]]

we offered to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that 
they could better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the 
rulemaking process. If the rule would affect your small business, 
organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions 
concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact 
Lieutenant M. Day, Waterways Oversight Branch, Coast Guard Activities 
New York (718) 354-4012.
    Small Businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information requirements 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking Of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Environment

    We have considered the environmental impact of this rule and 
concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g), of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.1D, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' 
is available in the docket for inspection or copying where indicated 
under ADDRESSES.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that Order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.

Regulation

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.


    2. In temporary Sec. 165.T01-165, revise paragraph (c) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 165.T01-165  Regulated Navigation Area: New York Marine Inspection 
Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

* * * * *
    (c) Effective dates. This section is effective from September 28, 
2001 through August 15, 2002.
* * * * *

    3. In temporary Sec. 165.T01-166, revise paragraph (b) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 165.T01-166  Safety and Security Zones: New York Marine Inspection 
Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

* * * * *
    (b) Effective dates. This section is effective from September 28, 
2001 through August 15, 2002.
* * * * *

    Dated: March 27, 2002.
G.N. Naccara,
Rear Admiral, Coast Guard, District Commander, First Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 02-8079 Filed 4-3-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P