[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10324-10325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-5463]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[COTP St. Louis-02-002]
RIN 2115-AA97


Security Zone; Missouri River, Mile Marker 532.9 to 532.5, 
Brownville, NE

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone 
encompassing all waters extending 250 feet from the shoreline of the 
right descending bank on the Missouri River, beginning from mile marker 
532.9 and ending at mile marker 532.5. This security zone is necessary 
to protect the Nebraska Public Power District Brownville Cooper Nuclear 
Power Plant in Brownville, Nebraska from any and all subversive actions 
from any groups or individuals whose objective it is to cause 
disruption to the daily operations of the Brownville Cooper Nuclear 
Power Plant. Entry of vessels into this security zone is prohibited 
unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port St. Louis or 
his designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 12 p.m. on January 7, 2002 through 8 
a.m. on June 15, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket, are part of docket [COTP St. Louis-02-002] and are 
available for inspection or copying at Marine Safety Office St. Louis, 
1222 Spruce St., Rm. 8.104E, St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2835, between 8 
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT David Webb, Marine Safety 
Detachment Quad Cities, Rock Island, IL at (309) 782-0627.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM, and, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), 
good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days 
after publication in the Federal Register. The catastrophic nature of, 
and resulting devastation from, the September 11, 2001 attacks on the 
World Trade Center towers in New York City and the Pentagon in 
Washington DC, makes this rulemaking necessary for the protection of 
national security interests. National security and intelligence 
officials warn that future terrorist attacks against United States 
interests are likely. Any delay in making this regulation effective 
would be contrary to the public interest because immediate action is 
necessary to protect against the possible loss of life, injury, or 
damage to property.

Background and Purpose

    On September 11, 2001, both towers of the World Trade Center and 
the Pentagon were attacked by terrorists. In response to these 
terrorist acts, heightened awareness and security of our ports and 
harbors is necessary. To enhance security the Captain of the Port, St. 
Louis is establishing a temporary security zone.
    This security zone includes all water extending 250 feet from the 
shoreline of the right descending bank on the Missouri River beginning 
from mile marker 532.9 to 532.5. This security zone is necessary to 
protect the public, facilities, and surrounding area from possible acts 
of sabotage or other subversive acts at the Brownville Cooper Nuclear 
Power Plant. All vessels and persons are prohibited from entering the 
zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port St. Louis or his 
designated representative.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The 
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. 
It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures 
of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26, 
1979).
    The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this proposal to be 
so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of 
the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This security zone will not have an impact on a substantial number 
of small entities because this rule will not obstruct the regular flow 
of vessel traffic and will allow vessel traffic to pass safely around 
the security zone. If you are a small business entity and are 
significantly affected by this regulation please contact LT Dave Webb, 
U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Detachment Quad Cities, Rock Island 
Arsenal Bldg 218, Rock Island, IL 61299-0627 at (309) 782-0627.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small 
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who 
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to 
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and 
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman 
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness 
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of 
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct

[[Page 10325]]

effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law 
or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have 
analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does 
not have implications for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
so discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Environment

    We have considered the environmental impact of this rule and 
concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g), of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.1D, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' 
is available for inspection or copying where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.

    2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T08-002 is added to read as follows:


Sec. 165.T08-002  Security Zone; Missouri River Miles 532.9 to 532.5, 
Brownville, NE.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: The waters of 
the Missouri River, extending 250 feet from the shoreline of the right 
descending bank beginning from mile marker 532.9 and ending at mile 
marker 532.5.
    (b) Effective date. This section is effective from 12 p.m. on 
January 7, 2002 through 8 a.m. on June 15, 2002.
    (c) Authority. The authority for this section is 33 U.S.C. 1226, 33 
U.S.C. 1231, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), and 49 CFR 1.46.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Entry into this security zone is prohibited 
unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port St. Louis or 
his designated representative.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the 
zone must request permission from the Captain of the Port St. Louis, or 
his designated representative. They may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 
or via telephone at (309) 782-0627 or (314) 539-3091, ext. 540.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of 
the Captain of the Port St. Louis and designated on-scene U.S. Coast 
Guard patrol personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel 
include commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the U.S. Coast 
Guard.

    Dated: January 7, 2002.
E.A. Washburn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port St. Louis.
[FR Doc. 02-5463 Filed 3-6-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U