[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 26, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8781-8785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-4532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-837]


Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Greenhouse 
Tomatoes From Canada

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final determination of sales at less than fair value.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 5, 2001, the Department of Commerce published its 
preliminary determination of sales at less than fair value of 
greenhouse tomatoes from Canada. The period of investigation is January 
1, 2000, through December 31, 2000. On October 19, 2001, the Department 
published a notice of amended preliminary determination of sales at 
less than fair value and postponement of final determination of 
greenhouse tomatoes from Canada.
    Based on our analysis of the comments received and certain findings 
from the verifications, we have made changes in the margin 
calculations. Therefore, the final determination differs from the 
preliminary determination and the amended preliminary determination.
    We determine that greenhouse tomatoes from Canada are being, or are 
likely to be, sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value prices 
as provided in section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The 
estimated margins of sales at less than fair value are shown in the 
``Final Determination'' section of this notice.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 26, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Ross or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 
Enforcement 3, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone; (202) 
482-4794 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Applicable Statute and Regulations
    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, 
all citations to the Department of Commerce's (the Department's) 
regulations refer to 19 CFR part 351 (April 2000).
Case History
    This investigation was initiated on April 17, 2001. See Initiation 
of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Greenhouse Tomatoes From Canada, 66 
FR 20630 (April 24, 2001) (Initiation Notice). The preliminary 
determination in this investigation was published on October 5, 2001. 
See Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value: Greenhouse Tomatoes From Canada, 66 FR 51010 (October 5, 2001) 
(Preliminary Determination). The Department also issued a Notice of 
Amended Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 
Postponement of Final Determination: Greenhouse Tomatoes From Canada, 
66 FR 53203 (October 19, 2001) (Amended Preliminary Determination and 
Postponement of Final Determination).
    In October, November, and December 2001, we conducted verification 
of the questionnaire responses of the five mandatory respondents in 
this case: BC Hot House Foods, Inc., Red Zoo Marketing (a.k.a. Produce 
Distributors, Inc.), Veg Gro Sales, Inc. (a.k.a. K & M Produce 
Distributors, Inc.), J-D Marketing, Inc., and Mastronardi Produce Ltd. 
We also conducted verification of five cost respondents.
    In January 2002, we received case briefs from the petitioners 
(i.e., Carolina Hydroponic Growers Inc., Eurofresh, HydroAge, Sunblest 
Management LLC, Sunblest Farms LLC, and Village Farms) and the 
mandatory respondents. The Department held a public hearing on January 
22, 2002, at the request of the parties.
Scope of Investigation
    The merchandise subject to this investigation consists of all fresh 
or chilled tomatoes grown in greenhouses in Canada, e.g., common round 
tomatoes, cherry tomatoes, plum or pear

[[Page 8782]]

tomatoes, and cluster or ``on-the-vine'' tomatoes. Specifically 
excluded from the scope of this investigation are all field-grown 
tomatoes.
    The merchandise subject to this investigation may enter the United 
States under item numbers 0702.00.2000, 0702.00.2010, 0702.00.2030, 
0702.00.2035, 0702.00.2060, 0702.00.2065, 0702.00.2090, 0702.00.2095, 
0702.00.4000, 0702.00.4030, 0702.00.4060, 0702.00.4090, 0702.00.6000, 
0702.00.6010, 0702.00.6030, 0702.00.6035, 0702.00.6060, 0702.00.6065, 
0702.00.6090, and 0702.00.6095 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (HTSUS). These subheadings may also cover products that 
are outside the scope of this investigation, i.e., field-grown 
tomatoes. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this 
investigation is dispositive.
    In accordance with our regulations, we set aside a period of time 
for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage and encouraged 
all parties to submit comments within 20 calendar days of publication 
of the Initiation Notice (66 FR 20630). On May 14, 2001, BC Vegetable 
Greenhouse I, L.P. (BCVG), filed comments requesting that the scope be 
limited to include only hydroponic tomatoes and expressly exclude 
``heirloom'' and ``organic'' tomatoes grown in greenhouses. On May 21, 
2001, the petitioners filed comments opposing BCVG's request to limit 
the scope. After considering the respondent's request and the 
petitioners' objections, we determined that the scope of this 
investigation should remain as published in the Initiation Notice. Our 
analysis of this scope issue is detailed in the memorandum from Laurie 
Parkhill, Director, Office 3, to Richard W. Moreland, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary, Group I, dated July 30, 2001, entitled ``Request to Limit 
Scope of Investigation.''
Period of Investigation
    The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2000, through 
December 31, 2000.
Fair Value Comparisons
    To determine whether sales of greenhouse tomatoes from Canada to 
the United States were made at less than fair value, we compared export 
price or constructed export price (CEP) to normal value. Our 
calculations followed the methodologies described in the Preliminary 
Determination, except as noted below, and in the February 19, 2002, 
Decision Memorandum and each individual respondent's calculation 
memorandum, which are on file in the Import Administration's Central 
Records Unit (CRU), Room B-099 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum 
can be accessed directly from the web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov. The 
paper copy and the electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.
Export Price and Constructed Export Price
    For certain sales to the United States, we used export price as 
defined in section 772(a) of the Act. For the remaining sales to the 
United States, we used CEP as defined in section 772(b) of the Act. We 
calculated export price and CEP based on the same methodologies 
described in the Preliminary Determination with the following 
exceptions:
BC Hot House Foods, Inc.
    We accepted the revised U.S. sales list that BC Hot House Foods, 
Inc., submitted on November 13, 2001, to incorporate corrections 
presented at the sales verification. Exhibit 1 of the December 20, 
2001, sales verification report for this respondent contains a detailed 
list of the corrections. Further, as discussed in the Final 
Determination Analysis Memorandum from Mark Ross to the file, dated 
February 19, 2002, we recalculated the credit expenses, direct 
advertising expenses, and indirect selling expenses for BC Hot House 
Foods, Inc.'s U.S. sales. Finally, based on the comments we received on 
the level-of-trade methodology for BC Hot House Foods, Inc. and our 
reexamination of the information on the record relating to this issue, 
we revised the level-of-trade designations for this respondent. See 
comment 8 of the February 19, 2002, Decision Memorandum.
Red Zoo Marketing
    We accepted Red Zoo Marketing's revised U.S. sales list pursuant to 
the corrections it presented at the start of verification, as described 
in Red Zoo Marketing's December 18, 2001, submission. We disregarded a 
billing adjustment that Red Zoo Marketing reported for one invoice 
where we found at verification that it did not make a billing 
adjustment. We adjusted the prices made for one U.S. customer where we 
found the customer only made a partial payment.
Veg Gro Sales, Inc.
    We accepted Veg Gro Sales, Inc.'s revised U.S. sales list submitted 
on November 19, 2001, pursuant to changes incorporated as a result of 
verification. We included two sales which were shipped during the POI 
but invoiced outside the POI and used the shipment date as the sale 
date for these two observations. We adjusted the indirect selling 
expense ratio to reflect corrections submitted by the company and 
verified by us.
Mastronardi Produce Ltd.
    We accepted Mastronardi Produce Ltd.'s revised U.S. sales list 
pursuant to changes incorporated as a result of verification. These 
changes affect the warehousing expenses, brokerage and handling 
expenses, packing expenses, and billing adjustments that Mastronardi 
Produce Ltd. reported as applicable to its U.S. sales.
J-D Marketing, Inc.
    We accepted J-D Marketing, Inc.'s revised U.S. sales list pursuant 
to changes incorporated as a result of verification. These changes 
affect the credit expenses, inland-freight expenses, product codes, 
quantities, packing costs, indirect selling expenses, discounts, and 
brokerage and handling expenses that J-D Marketing, Inc., reported in 
relation to certain U.S. sales.
Normal Value
    We used the same methodology as that described in the Preliminary 
Determination to determine the cost of production and normal value, 
with certain exceptions described below.
1. Cost-of-Production Analysis
BC Hot House Foods, Inc.
    As discussed in the memorandum from Sheikh Hannan to Neal Halper 
entitled ``Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation 
Adjustments for the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 2002, 
concerning Canagro and Pacific Lagoon, we calculated the per-unit cost 
of manufacturing based on the production quantities maintained by two 
producers which supply BC Hot House Foods, Inc. (Canagro and Pacific 
Lagoon). We revised the general and administrative (G&A) amount 
applicable to Canagro and Pacific Lagoon's parent company that had been 
included in the G&A rate calculation. We calculated each company's 
financial-expense rate based on the highest level of consolidation 
normally prepared by the companies.

[[Page 8783]]

    As discussed in the memorandum from Sheikh Hannan to Neal Halper 
entitled ``Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation 
Adjustments for the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 2002, 
concerning the other cost respondent we selected for BC Hot House 
Foods, Inc., we adjusted the reported G&A rate to include the damaged-
goods variance.
    Additionally, as discussed in the memorandum from Sheikh Hannan to 
Neal Halper, ``Weighted-Average Cost of Production and Constructed 
Value Calculation for the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 
2002, concerning BC Hot House Foods, Inc., we calculated BC Hot House 
Foods, Inc.'s cost for each type of tomato by weight-averaging the cost 
of all the cost respondents from which BC Hot House Foods, Inc., 
obtained tomatoes.
Red Zoo Marketing
    As discussed in the memorandum from Laurens van Houten to Neal 
Halper entitled ``Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation 
Adjustments for the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 2002, 
concerning Great Northern Hydroponics, we adjusted its reported costs 
to include the full amount the company incurred for heating costs 
during the POI. We removed the trough-system adjustment because at 
verification the company chose not to pursue those amounts. We included 
the full heating cost and the trough-system costs in the denominator of 
the revised G&A rate calculation. We calculated Great Northern 
Hydroponics's financial-expense rate based on the highest level of 
consolidation normally prepared by the company.
    Additionally, as discussed in the memorandum from Laurens van 
Houten to Neal Halper, ``Weighted-Average Cost of Production and 
Constructed Value Calculation for the Final Determination'' dated 
February 19, 2002, concerning Red Zoo Marketing, we calculated its cost 
for each type of tomato by weight-averaging the cost of all the cost 
respondents from which Red Zoo Marketing obtained tomatoes.
Veg Gro Sales, Inc.
    As discussed in the memorandum from Heidi Norris to Neal Halper, 
``Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for 
the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 2002, concerning Veg Gro 
Inc., we adjusted its reported costs to include the corrections 
presented on the first day of the cost verification. We adjusted Veg 
Gro Inc.'s reported costs to include the full amount the company 
incurred for heating costs during the POI. We also included the full 
amount of depreciation expense normally recorded in the company's 
financial statements that are prepared in accordance with Canadian 
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Additionally, we 
included marketing-board fees and shareholder life-insurance expenses, 
and we revised the G&A rate calculation. In the revised G&A rate 
calculation, we included the full heating cost and depreciation amounts 
in the denominator. Further, we revised Veg Gro Inc.'s financial-
expense rate to exclude imputed short-term interest income and to 
include all interest expense incurred by the company. We also revised 
the reported packing costs to reflect the transfer price paid to an 
affiliate.
    As discussed in the memorandum from Minoo Hatten to File, ``Cost of 
Production and Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for the Final 
Determination'' dated February 19, 2002, concerning Amco Farms, Inc., 
we adjusted its reported costs to include the full amount the company 
incurred for heating costs during the POI. We included the full amount 
of depreciation expense normally recorded in the company's financial 
statements that are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. We 
revised Amco Farms Inc.'s fixed-overhead calculation to include the 
excluded costs for the cooler. We have revised the calculation of Amco 
Farms Inc.'s G&A rate to include management fees. In the revised G&A 
rate calculation, we included the full heating cost and depreciation 
amounts in the denominator. We revised its financial-expense rate to 
include short-term interest income received from affiliates and all 
long-term interest expense incurred by the company.
    Additionally, as discussed in the memorandum from Laurens van 
Houten to Neal Halper, ``Weighted-Average Cost of Production and 
Constructed Value Calculation for the Final Determination'' dated 
February 19, 2002, concerning Veg Gro Sales, Inc., we calculated Veg 
Gro Sales, Inc.'s cost for each type of tomato by weight-averaging the 
cost of all the cost respondents from which Veg Gro Sales, Inc., 
obtained tomatoes.
Mastronardi Produce Ltd.
    As discussed in the memorandum from Sheikh Hannan to Neal Halper, 
``Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for 
the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 2002, concerning Mastron 
Enterprises, we adjusted its reported costs to include the full amount 
the company incurred for heating costs and repairs and maintenance 
during the POI. We revised the cost calculations to be based on acreage 
rather that management estimates. We revised the G&A rate calculation 
to include the full heating cost and repairs and maintenance amounts in 
the denominator. We revised the amount for indirect selling expenses to 
exclude the foreign-exchange gains on accounts payable that were not 
related to the sale of greenhouse tomatoes. We also included office-
administration income and management bonuses in the revised calculation 
of indirect selling expenses.
    Additionally, as discussed in the memorandum from Sheikh Hannan to 
Neal Halper, ``Weighted-Average Cost of Production and Constructed 
Value Calculation for the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 
2002, concerning Mastronardi Produce Ltd., we calculated its cost for 
each type of tomato by weight-averaging the cost of all the cost 
respondents from which Mastronardi Produce Ltd. obtained tomatoes.
J-D Marketing, Inc.
    As discussed in the memorandum from Laurens van Houten to Neal 
Halper, ``Cost of Production and Constructed Value Calculation 
Adjustments for the Final Determination'' dated February 19, 2002, 
concerning I.P.R. Farms Ltd., we adjusted the acreage factors used to 
allocate costs to reflect the actual acreage for each product produced. 
We revised the seed cost to reflect the actual cost of seeds. We 
adjusted its reported costs to include the full amount the company 
incurred for heating costs and depreciation during the POI as recorded 
in its financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. 
We revised the reported G&A expenses to include the full amount 
incurred for executive salaries, marketing-board fees, and travel 
expenses, and we excluded a double-counted expense reimbursement from 
the G&A amount. We included the full amount of interest expense 
incurred by I.P.R. Farms Ltd. in the revised financial-expense 
calculation. In the revised G&A rate calculation, we included the full 
heating cost and depreciation amounts in the denominator. We increased 
the packing costs to include interest and G&A of the packer.
    Additionally, as discussed in the memorandum from Laurens van 
Houten to Neal Halper, ``Weighted-Average Cost of Production and 
Constructed Value Calculation for the Final Determination'' dated 
February 19,

[[Page 8784]]

2002, concerning J-D Marketing, Inc., we calculated J-D Marketing, 
Inc.'s cost for each type of tomato by weight-averaging the cost of all 
the cost respondents from which J-D Marketing, Inc. obtained tomatoes.
2. Calculation of Normal Value
BC Hot House Foods, Inc.
    We accepted the revised home-market sales list that BC Hot House 
Foods, Inc., submitted on November 13, 2001, to incorporate corrections 
presented at the sales verification. Exhibit 1 of the December 20, 
2001, verification report for BC Hot House Foods, Inc., contains a 
detailed list of these corrections. We corrected a billing adjustment 
that BC Hot House Foods, Inc., reported inaccurately for one home-
market sale, and we corrected the quantity that it reported 
inaccurately for another home-market sale. Further, as discussed in the 
final determination analysis memorandum from Mark Ross to the file, 
dated February 19, 2002, we recalculated the credit expenses, direct 
advertising expenses, and indirect selling expenses for BC Hot House 
Foods, Inc.'s home-market sales. Finally, based on the comments we 
received on the level-of-trade methodology for BC Hot House Foods, Inc. 
and our reexamination of the information on the record relating to this 
issue, we revised the level-of-trade designations for this respondent. 
See comment 8 of the February 19, 2002, Decision Memorandum.
Red Zoo Marketing
    We accepted Red Zoo Marketing's revised home-market sales list 
pursuant to the corrections the respondent presented at the start of 
verification as described in its December 18, 2001, submission.
Veg Gro Sales, Inc.
    We accepted Veg Gro Sales, Inc.'s revised home-market sales list 
pursuant to changes incorporated as a result of verification as 
described in its November 19, 2001, submission. We deleted certain 
sales that Veg Gro Sales, Inc., made to an employee, corrected the 
payment date for one sale, and made an adjustment to indirect selling 
expenses to reflect corrections submitted by the company and which we 
verified.
Mastronardi Produce Ltd.
    We accepted Mastronardi Produce Ltd.'s revised home-market sales 
list pursuant to changes incorporated as a result of verification. 
These changes affected the warehousing expenses, credit expenses, 
packing expenses, and billing adjustments Mastronardi Produce Ltd. 
reported for certain home-market sales.
J-D Marketing, Inc.
    We accepted J-D Marketing, Inc.'s revised home-market sales list 
pursuant to changes incorporated as a result of verification. These 
changes affected the quantities, commissions, credit expenses, and 
inland-freight expenses that J-D Marketing, Inc., reported for certain 
home-market sales. The changes also resulted in the addition to the 
sales list of a sale and certain credits that the respondent had 
omitted from the home-market sales list.
3. Calculation of Constructed Value
    For each of the respondents, we calculated the cost of materials 
and fabrication based on the methodology described in the ``Cost-of-
Production Analysis'' section of this notice when calculating 
constructed value.
Currency Conversions
    We made currency conversions in accordance with section 773A of the 
Act in the same manner as in the Preliminary Determination.
Analysis of Comments Received
    All issues raised in the case briefs by parties to this proceeding 
and to which we have responded are listed in the Appendix to this 
notice and addressed in the Decision Memorandum, which is adopted by 
this notice.
Verification
    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we verified the 
information submitted by the respondents for use in our final 
determination. We used standard verification procedures including 
examination of relevant accounting and production records, as well as 
original source documents provided by the respondents.
Final Determination
    We determine that the following percentage weighted-average margins 
exist for the period January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Weighted-average margin
                Exporter/Grower                        (percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BC Hot House Foods, Inc........................                    18.21
Red Zoo Marketing (a.k.a. Produce Distributors,                     1.86
 Inc.).........................................
Veg Gro Sales, Inc. (a.k.a. K & M Produce                           3.85
 Distributors, Inc.)...........................
J-D Marketing, Inc.............................                     1.53
Mastronardi Produce Ltd........................                    14.89
All Others.....................................                    16.22
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A), we have excluded from the 
calculation of the all-others rate margins which are zero, de mimimis, 
or determined entirely on facts available. Because we calculated de 
minimis margins for Red Zoo Marketing and J-D Marketing, Inc., we 
calculated the all-others rate on the basis of the margins applicable 
to BC Hot House Foods, Inc., Mastronardi Produce Ltd., and Veg Gro 
Sales, Inc.
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we are 
directing the Customs Service to continue to suspend liquidation of all 
imports of subject merchandise except for exports by J-D Marketing, 
Inc. (and J-D Marketing, Inc.'s affiliate, Special Edition Marketing), 
and Red Zoo Marketing (which have zero or de minimis weighted-average 
margins), that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after October 5, 2001, the date of publication of the 
Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register. We will instruct the 
Customs Service to continue to require a cash deposit or the posting of 
a bond equal to the weighted-average amount by which the normal value 
exceeds the export price or CEP, as indicated in the chart above, 
effective the date of publication of this final determination.
    Because Red Zoo Marketing and J-D Marketing, Inc. (and its 
affiliate, Special Edition Marketing), are non-producing exporters, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.204(e)(3), we are limiting the exclusion 
from these suspension-of-

[[Page 8785]]

liquidation instructions to entries only of subject merchandise 
exported by Red Zoo Marketing or J-D Marketing, Inc. (and its 
affiliate, Special Edition Marketing), that is produced or supplied by 
the companies that supplied these respondents during the POI. Any 
entries of subject merchandise exported by Red Zoo Marketing or J-D 
Marketing, Inc. (and its affiliate, Special Edition Marketing), which 
is not produced or supplied by the companies that supplied these 
respondents during the POI will be subject to the all-others rate.
    For Red Zoo Marketing, because its estimated weighted-average final 
dumping margin is de minimis, we are directing Customs to terminate 
suspension of liquidation of entries of merchandise from Red Zoo 
Marketing that were produced by the companies that supplied Red Zoo 
Marketing during the POI and refund all bonds and cash deposits posted 
on such subject merchandise exported by Red Zoo Marketing. Because we 
never required suspension of liquidation or the posting of cash 
deposits or bonds for entries of merchandise from J-D Marketing, Inc., 
no such step is necessary.
    These suspension-of-liquidation instructions will remain in effect 
until further notice.
International Trade Commission Notification
    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we have notified the 
International Trade Commission (ITC) of our final determination. As our 
final antidumping determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine, 
within 45 days, whether these imports are causing material injury or 
threat of material injury to the U.S. industry. If the ITC determines 
that material injury or threat of injury does not exist, the proceeding 
will be terminated and all securities posted will be refunded or 
canceled. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the 
Department will issue an antidumping duty order directing Customs 
officials to assess antidumping duties on all imports of the subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation.
    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 
735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    February 19, 2002.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix--Issues in the Decision Memorandum
Common Issues
1. Province-Specific All-Others Rate
2. Extraordinary Costs
3. Payments to Owners
4. Amortization of Assets
5. Averaging Prices Across Grades, Sizes, and Color for the Cost Test
6. Calculating a Difference-in-Merchandise Adjustment Based on Market 
Value
7. Weighted-Average Cost Versus Simple-Average Cost
Company-Specific Issues
BC Hot House Foods, Inc.
8. Level of Trade
9. Allocation of U.S. Advertising Expenses
10. Canagro's Start-Up Adjustment
11. Weight-Averaging the Cost for BCCH's Cost Respondents
12. Combined Interest and General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses
13. Accuracy of Canagro's Production Quantities
14. Use of Corrected BCHH Sales Lists
15. Reclassification of Certain BCHH Customers
16. Representativeness of Cost for BCHH
Red Zoo Marketing
17. Combined Financial Expense
18. Cost-Allocation Errors
Mastronardi Produce Limited
19. Capitalization of Costs
20. Cost Allocations Based on Supplier and Management Representations
21. Calculation of Mastronardi's Indirect Selling Expense Rate
22. Treatment of Mastronardi's Management Bonuses Veg Gro Sales, Inc.
23. Management Estimates
24. Arithmetical Error
25. Clerical Errors With Regard to Amco Farms, Inc.
26. Exporter G&A and Financial-Expense Ratios
27. Clerical Error Affecting COP and CV Calculations
28. Expenses Paid on Behalf of Owners
J-D Marketing, Inc.
29. Accuracy of Cost Data for IPR Farms
30. Representativeness and Accuracy of COP Analysis
31. Exclusion of Cluster-Roma and Cherry Tomatoes from Margin 
Calculations
32. Expenses Paid on Behalf of Owners
[FR Doc. 02-4532 Filed 2-25-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S