[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2002)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C2-59]



  Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2002 / 
CORRECTIONS  

[[Page 5365]]



OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, 
Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies

Correction

    In notice document 02-59 beginning on page 369 in the issue of 
Thursday, January 3, 2002 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 369, in the second column, under the heading 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, fifth and sixth lines, ``Office of 
Management (OMB)'' should read ``Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB)''.
    2. On page 369, second column, first line from the bottom, a 
semicolon should be inserted, so that it reads, ``disseminated by the 
agency and;''.
    3. On page 369, third column, first full paragraph, eighth line, 
``September 20001'' should read ``September 2001''.
    4. On page 370, second column, first paragraph, thirteenth line, 
should read ``procedures required by these guidelines''.
    5. On page 370, second column, first paragraph, the sentence 
beginning on line 27 should read as follows: ``Under the OMB 
guidelines, agencies need only ensure that their own guidelines are 
consistent with these OMB guidelines, and then ensure that their 
administrative mechanisms satisfy the standards and procedural 
requirements in the new agency guidelines.''
    6. On page 371, first column, first full paragraph, line 12 should 
read ``an annual fiscal year report to OMB (to be''.
    7. On page 371, third column, last line of the column, 
``objective'' should read ``objectivity''.
    8. On page 372, first column, first full paragraph, thirteenth 
line, insert ``a'' between ``in'' and ``particular''
    9. On page 372, first column, first full paragraph, fifteenth line, 
``objective'' should read ``objectivity''.
    10. On page 372, first column, first full paragraph, twenty-sixth 
line, ``disclosed'' should read ``disclose''.
    11. On page 372, first column, second paragraph, fourth line, ``For 
example.'' should read ``For example,''.
    12. On page 372, second column, second paragraph under the heading 
Is Journal Peer Review Always Sufficient?, in the sixth line, ``or'' 
should read ``on''.
    13. On page 372, second column, in line 18 of the indented 
quotation, insert ``a'' between ``as'' and ``whole''.
    14. On page 372, second column, fifth paragraph, third line, 
``significance'' should read ``significant''.
    15. On page 373, second column, ninth line, ``e.g.'' should read 
``e.g.,''.
    16. On page 373, third column, first paragraph, first line, ``no'', 
should read ``not''.
    17. On page 373, third column, first paragraph, tenth line, 
``analytic'' should read ``analytical''.
    18. On page 374, first column, last line, ``date'' should read 
``data''.
    19. On page 374, second column, in the seventh line of the first 
paragraph, insert ``be'', between ``will'' and ``helpful''.
    20. On page 374, second column, third paragraph, first line, 
``Commercial'' should read ``Comments''.
    21. On page 375, second column, second paragraph, ninth line, 
``V.3.ii.C'' should read ``V.3.b.ii.C''.
    22. On page 375, third column, third paragraph, ``OMS's'' should 
read ``OMB's''.
    23. On page 376, second column, paragraph ii, fifth line, ``filed'' 
should read ``file''.
    24. On page 376, second column, paragraph 4., first line, ``The 
Agency's...'' should read ``The agency's...''.
    25. On page 376, second column, paragraph 4., fifth line, 
``administative's'' should read ``administative''.
    26. On page 376, second column, paragraph 4., ninth line, ``October 
1, 2001'' should read ``October 1, 2002''.
    27. On page 376, in the third column, first line, the second ``or'' 
should read ``a''.
    28. On page 376, third column, paragraph 5., fourth line, remove 
the word ``the''.
    29. On page 376, third column, paragraph 5., sixth line, ``July 1, 
2001'' should read ``July 1, 2002''.
    30. On page 376, third column, paragraph 2. under V. Definitions, 
sixth line, ``reconsider'' should read ``consider''.
    31. On page 376, third column, paragraph 2. under V. Definitions, 
seventh line, insert ``the'' after ``from''.
    32. On page 377, first column, paragraph 3., second line, 
``presentations'' should read ``presentation''.
    33. On page 377, first column, paragraph a., sixteenth line, 
``specific'' should read ``scientific''.
    34. On page 377, first column, in the second line from the bottom, 
``vigorous'' should read ``rigorous''.
    35. On page 377, second column, first line, ``response'' should 
read ``responsible''.
    36. On page 377, second column, paragraph A., ninth line, 
``practicable'' should read ``practicably''.
    37. On page 377, second column, paragraph ii., seventeenth line, 
``such'' should read ``which''.
    38. On page 377, second line from the bottom of the second column, 
``equality'' should read ``quality''.
    39. On page 378, first column, paragraph V.10., seventh line, 
``tolerate'' should read ``tolerated''.

[FR Doc. C2-59 Filed 2-4-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D