[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4248-4249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-2098]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR02-3-000]


Ultramar Inc. Complainant, v. Calnev Pipe Line, L.L.C. 
Respondent; Notice of Complaint

January 23, 2002.
    Take notice that on January 18, 2002, pursuant to Rule 206 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.206) and the 
Procedural Rules Applicable to Oil Pipeline Procedures (18 CFR 343, et 
seq.), Ultramar Inc. (Ultramar) filed a Complaint and Motion for 
Consolidation in the above captioned proceeding. Ultramar alleges that 
Calnev Pipe Line, L.L.C. (Calnev) has violated the Interstate Commerce 
Act, 49 U.S.C. App. Sec. 1, et seq., by charging unjust and 
unreasonable rates for Calnev's jurisdictional interstate services 
associated with its lines originating at Colton in San Bernardino 
County, California, to stations at two interstate destinations in Clark 
County, Nevada, one at McCarran Field and the other at North Las Vegas 
as more fully set forth in the Complaint. To the extent that any of 
Calnev's rates may be deemed just and reasonable under Sec. 1803 of the 
Energy Policy Act of 1992, Public Law 102-486, 106 Stat. 2776 (1992), 
Ultramar alleges that there has been a substantial change in the 
economic circumstances on which the rates are based.
    Ultramar requests that the Commission: (1) Examine the challenged 
rates and charges collected by Calnev for its jurisdictional interstate 
services; (2) order reparations to Ultramar, including appropriate 
interest thereon, for the applicable reparation periods to the extent 
the Commission finds that such rates or charges were unlawful; (3) 
determine just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory rates for Calnev's 
jurisdictional interstate service; (4) award Ultramar reasonable 
attorneys' and experts' fees and costs; and (5) order such other relief 
as may be appropriate.
    Ultramar states that it has served the Complaint on Calnev pursuant 
to Rule 206 of the Commission's Rules of

[[Page 4249]]

Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206(c). Calnev's response to this 
Complaint is due within 20 days of the filing of this Complaint 
pursuant to the Commission's Procedural Rules Applicable to Oil 
Pipeline Proceedings, 18 CFR 343.4.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before February 7, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before 
February 7, 2001. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed 
on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select 
``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-2098 Filed 1-28-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P