[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2549-2558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-1305]



 ========================================================================
 Rules and Regulations
                                                 Federal Register
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
 having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
 to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
 under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
 
 The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
 Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
 week.
 
 ========================================================================
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2002 / Rules 
and Regulations  

[[Page 2549]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 301

[TD 8980]
RIN 1545-AW90


Notice and Opportunity for Hearing Before Levy

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the 
provision of notice to taxpayers of a right to a hearing before levy. 
The regulations implement certain changes made by section 3401 of the 
Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. They 
affect taxpayers against whose property or rights to property the 
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intends to levy.

DATES: Effective Date: January 18, 2002.
    Applicability date: These regulations apply to any levy which 
occurs on or after January 19, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerome D. Sekula, (202) 622-3610 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This document contains amendments to the Regulations on Procedure 
and Administration (26 CFR part 301) relating to the provision of 
notice under section 6330 of the Internal Revenue Code to taxpayers of 
a right to a hearing (a collection due process, or CDP, hearing) before 
levy. These final regulations implement certain changes made by section 
3401 of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 
1998 (Pub. L. 105-206; 112 Stat. 685) (RRA 1998). The final regulations 
affect taxpayers against whose property or rights to property the IRS 
intends to levy.
    On January 22, 1999, temporary regulations (TD 8809) implementing 
these changes made by section 3401 of RRA 1998 were published in the 
Federal Register (64 FR 3405). A notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-
117620-98) cross-referencing the temporary regulations was published on 
the same day in the Federal Register (64 FR 3462). No written comments 
were received within the 90-day period provided for comments, although 
two comments were received after this comment period.
    Section 6320 also was added by section 3401 of RRA 1998 and 
provides for notice to taxpayers of a right to a hearing after the 
filing of a notice of federal tax lien (NFTL). A number of the 
provisions in section 6330 concerning the conduct and judicial review 
of a CDP hearing are incorporated by reference in section 6320. On 
January 22, 1999, temporary regulations (TD 8810) under section 6320 
were published in the Federal Register (64 FR 3398). A notice of 
proposed rulemaking (REG-116824-98) cross-referencing the temporary 
regulations was published on the same day in the Federal Register (64 
FR 3461). Final regulations under section 6320 are being published in 
the Federal Register along with these final regulations under section 
6330.
    After consideration of the comments, the proposed regulations, with 
certain changes to reflect IRS administrative practice under section 
6330, are adopted as final regulations. The comments and changes are 
discussed below.

Summary of Comments

    Both commentators urged that final regulations under section 6330 
provide that potentially affected third-parties (i.e., persons not 
liable for the tax at issue) are entitled to notice and a hearing 
before the IRS Office of Appeals (Appeals) before the IRS levies on any 
property or right to property. Treasury and the IRS have concluded that 
the person liable for the tax set out in the collection due process 
notice (CDP Notice), whether issued under section 6320 or section 6330, 
is the person entitled to a CDP Notice and a CDP hearing under those 
sections. Section 6320(a)(1) provides that a CDP Notice provided under 
section 6320 will be sent to the person described in section 6321. The 
person described in section 6321 is the person liable to pay the tax--
i.e., the taxpayer.
    With respect to section 6330, the legislative history to section 
6330 indicates that Congress intended to supplement the existing notice 
requirement under section 6331. Under section 6331, the IRS generally 
must provide a person liable for any tax (and who refuses to pay the 
tax after notice and demand) notice before levying on the property or 
rights to property of that person. Section 6330, in addition to the 
notice required under section 6331, provides for notice of the right to 
an Appeals hearing before levy.
    Accordingly, the final regulations under both section 6320 and 
section 6330 provide that the person entitled to a CDP Notice under 
those sections is the person liable for the tax set out in the CDP 
Notice, or the taxpayer. Generally, when a third party's rights are 
affected by lien or levy, those rights can be protected through other 
administrative and judicial remedies, such as an administrative hearing 
before Appeals under its Collection Appeals Program or a wrongful levy 
or quiet title action.
    One commentator requested that the final regulations establish 
formal procedures for the conduct of a CDP hearing as well as 
procedures for the admission and preservation of evidence to be 
considered by Appeals. Treasury and the IRS have declined to adopt this 
comment. Section 6320 and section 6330 are intended to give all 
taxpayers a right to an impartial Appeals review of the filing of a 
NFTL or of an intended levy action, with an additional right of 
judicial review of the Appeals determination. Section 6330(c) 
(applicable to both sections) and the proposed regulations under 
section 6320 and section 6330 (as modified by final regulations) 
already set out the specific requirements, including the issues to be 
considered, for a CDP hearing and require that Appeals issue a written 
determination (Notice of Determination) setting forth Appeals' findings 
and decisions. Due to the varied circumstances of taxpayers and the 
varied situations in which the filing of a NFTL or an intended levy 
action may arise, the final regulations provide flexibility regarding 
the manner in which a CDP hearing may be conducted.

[[Page 2550]]

    One commentator stated that persons should have a right to judicial 
review in a retained jurisdiction case under section 6330(d)(2). 
Treasury and the IRS decline to adopt this comment. Under section 
6330(b)(2), a taxpayer is entitled to only one CDP hearing with respect 
to the tax set out on a CDP Notice issued under section 6330. Section 
6320(b)(2) provides a similar rule for section 6320. Under section 
6330(d)(1), applicable to both section 6320 and section 6330, a 
taxpayer is entitled to judicial review only after the issuance of the 
determination by Appeals after a CDP hearing. Once the Notice of 
Determination has been issued, any subsequent consideration of the case 
by Appeals, including changed circumstances, based on Appeals' retained 
jurisdiction under section 6330(d)(2), is not part of the CDP hearing 
subject to judicial review.
    One commentator also urged that a taxpayer be allowed to challenge 
the existence or amount of the tax liability set out in a CDP Notice 
issued under section 6330 even if the taxpayer had previously failed to 
raise such a challenge pursuant to a CDP Notice issued under section 
6320. The commentator points to section 6330(c)(4), which provides 
generally that a person who had meaningfully participated in a section 
6320 CDP hearing in which an issue was raised may not raise that same 
issue in a subsequent section 6330 CDP hearing. Treasury and the IRS 
have concluded that section 6330(c)(2)(B), addressing specifically a 
person's right to challenge the underlying tax liability, is clear that 
any prior opportunity to challenge the underlying tax liability, which 
would include a section 6320 CDP hearing, precludes a taxpayer from 
doing so at a later section 6330 CDP hearing.

Explanation of Revisions

    The proposed regulations provided that district directors, 
directors of service centers and the Assistant Commissioner 
(International) would be the officials required to give notice of the 
right to, and the opportunity for, a CDP hearing to a taxpayer prior to 
levy on that taxpayer's property. To reflect the recent reorganization 
of the IRS, paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of the final regulations 
eliminate references to these specific officers and substitutes a 
general authorization to the IRS to provide such notification.
    Examples, similar to those in the corresponding paragraphs of the 
final regulations under section 6320, have been added in paragraphs (b) 
and (c) of these final regulations to illustrate the provisions of 
those paragraphs.
    Question and Answer (Q&A) C1 of the proposed regulations stated 
that a request for a CDP hearing must be signed by the taxpayer or the 
taxpayer's authorized representative. Requests for CDP hearings on 
occasion are not signed by the taxpayer or the taxpayer's authorized 
representative but instead are filed on the taxpayer's behalf by the 
taxpayer's spouse or other personal representative not authorized to 
practice before Appeals. The IRS's administrative practice has been to 
treat these requests as complying with the temporary regulations 
provided that the taxpayer or the taxpayer's authorized representative 
signs the request within a reasonable period of time. Q&A C1 in the 
final regulations is revised to reflect this administrative practice.
    Q&A C6 of the proposed regulations provided that a request for a 
CDP hearing should be filed with the IRS office that issued the CDP 
Notice or, if the taxpayer did not know the address of that IRS office, 
then with one of two alternative IRS offices. Q&A C6 of the final 
regulations requires that a request for a CDP hearing be filed with the 
IRS office and address indicated on the CDP Notice. The final 
regulations change the alternative addresses to reflect the IRS's 
recent reorganization. The final regulations provide that if no address 
is provided in the CDP Notice, then the request must be filed with the 
compliance area director, or his or her successor, serving the 
compliance area in which the taxpayer resides or has its principal 
place of business. The final regulations provide a toll-free number to 
obtain the address of the office of the appropriate compliance area 
director, or his or her successor.
    The proposed regulations did not discuss how a CDP hearing should 
be conducted and where or how it may occur. A new Q&A D6, relating to 
how CDP hearings are conducted, and a new Q&A D7, relating to where in-
person meetings will be held, are added to the final regulations to 
clarify how a CDP hearing may be conducted.
    Paragraph (e)(2) of the proposed regulations, dealing with spousal 
defenses under section 6015, has been revised in the final regulations 
to also address spousal defenses raised under section 66. Q&A E3 of the 
proposed regulations, dealing with the extent of any limitations 
imposed under section 6330(c)(2)(B), has been revised in the final 
regulations to also address the effect of a spousal defense raised 
under section 66. The proposed regulations did not specifically discuss 
whether a taxpayer may raise a spousal defense at a CDP hearing when 
the taxpayer has raised that defense administratively, but has not 
raised it in a judicial proceeding that has become final. A new Q&A E4 
is added to the final regulations to provide that a spousal defense may 
be raised if the IRS has not made a final determination as to that 
spousal defense in a final determination letter or statutory notice of 
deficiency. Q&A E4 of the proposed regulations, dealing with spousal 
defenses that were raised in a prior judicial proceeding, has been 
revised to also discuss the effect of a spousal defense raised under 
section 66, and has been renumbered as Q&A E5 of the final regulations.
    Q&A E8 of the proposed regulations dealt with the question of 
whether there were any time limits on when a Notice of Determination 
must be issued. That Q&A, now Q&A E9 of the final regulations, has been 
revised to clarify the there are no time limitations on when a CDP 
hearing must be held or on when a Notice of Determination must be 
issued, except that both must be done as expeditiously as possible 
under the circumstances.
    Under section 6330(c)(2)(B), a taxpayer may not challenge the 
existence or the amount of the underlying tax liability at a CDP 
hearing if the taxpayer has had a prior opportunity to dispute that 
liability--i.e., the taxpayer had received a statutory notice of 
deficiency or otherwise had an opportunity to dispute the underlying 
tax liability. The final regulations add a new Q&A E11 to address the 
effect of an Appeals officer's or employee's consideration of liability 
issues when the taxpayer has had a prior opportunity to dispute the 
underlying tax liability. In such circumstances, any consideration of 
liability issues by the Appeals officer or employee is discretionary 
and is not treated as part of the CDP hearing. Accordingly, the Appeals 
officer's or employee's determinations, if any, made with respect to 
liability issues are not required to appear in the Notice of 
Determination. Any determinations regarding the underlying tax 
liability that are included in the Notice of Determination are not 
reviewable by a district court or the Tax Court.
    Q&A F2 and Q&A I5 of the proposed regulations, both relating to 
judicial review of CDP cases where a spousal defense under section 6015 
is raised, specifically referred only to paragraphs (b) and (c) of 
section 6015. Q&A F2 and Q&A I5 have been revised in the final 
regulations also to include a denial of relief under section 6015(f).
    Section 6330(e) generally provides for the suspension of the 
periods of limitation under section 6502, section 6531, and section 
6532 after the filing of

[[Page 2551]]

a request for a CDP hearing under section 6330, and also provides that 
levy actions that are the subject of the requested CDP hearing are 
suspended during this same period. A new Q&A G3 is added to the final 
regulations to clarify what collection actions the IRS may take after a 
request for a CDP hearing under section 6330 has been filed.
    As set out in Q&A G3 of the final regulations, the IRS may file 
NFTLs for the tax and tax period covered by the CDP Notice issued under 
section 6330, although such filings may give rise to issuance of a CDP 
Notice under section 6320. The IRS also may take enforcement actions 
for tax periods and taxes not covered by a CDP Notice that is the 
subject of the CDP hearing requested under section 6320. For example, 
the IRS may file NFTLs for tax periods or taxes not covered by the CDP 
Notice (although such filings may give rise to issuance of a CDP Notice 
under section 6320) and may levy for those taxes and tax periods if the 
CDP requirements under section 6330 as to those taxes and tax periods 
have been satisfied and CDP proceedings, if any, concluded. The IRS 
further is not prohibited by section 6330(e) from taking other non-levy 
collection actions such as initiating judicial proceedings to collect 
the tax shown on the CDP Notice issued under section 6330 or from 
offsetting overpayments from other periods, or of other taxes, against 
the tax shown on the CDP Notice. Moreover, the IRS may levy upon any 
state tax refund due the taxpayer, and, under appropriate 
circumstances, make jeopardy levies for the tax and tax periods covered 
by the CDP Notice at issue in the CDP hearing. Finally, section 6330 
does not prohibit the IRS from accepting any voluntary payments made 
for the tax and tax period set out in the CDP Notice.

Special Analyses

    It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a 
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. 
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been 
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations and because these 
regulations do not impose a collection of information on small 
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not 
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the 
preceding temporary regulation was submitted to the Chief Counsel for 
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact 
on small business.

Drafting Information

    The principal author of this regulation is Jerome D. Sekula, of the 
Office of Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure and Administration 
(Collection, Bankruptcy and Summonses Division).

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301

    Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income 
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations

    Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is amended as follows:

PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION

    1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in part as 
follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


    2. Section 301.6330-1 is added under the undesignated centerheading 
``Seizure of Property for Collection of Taxes'' to read as follows:


Sec. 301.6330-1  Notice and opportunity for hearing prior to levy.

    (a) Notification--(1) In general. Except as specified in paragraph 
(a)(2) of this section, the Commissioner, or his or her delegate (the 
Commissioner), will prescribe procedures to provide persons upon whose 
property or rights to property the IRS intends to levy (hereinafter 
referred to as the taxpayer) on or after January 19, 1999, notice of 
that intention and to give them the right to, and the opportunity for, 
a pre-levy Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing with the Internal 
Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Appeals (Appeals). This pre-levy 
Collection Due Process Hearing Notice (CDP Notice) must be given in 
person, left at the dwelling or usual place of business of the 
taxpayer, or sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt 
requested, to the taxpayer's last known address. For further guidance 
regarding the definition of last known address, see Sec. 301.6212-2.
    (2) Exceptions--(i) state tax refunds. Section 6330(f) does not 
require the Commissioner to provide the taxpayer with notification of 
the taxpayer's right to a CDP hearing prior to issuing a levy to 
collect state tax refunds owing to the taxpayer. However, the 
Commissioner will prescribe procedures to give the taxpayer notice of 
the right to, and the opportunity for, a CDP hearing with Appeals with 
respect to any such levy issued on or after January 19, 1999, within a 
reasonable time after the levy has occurred. The notification required 
to be given following a levy on a state tax refund is referred to as a 
post-levy CDP Notice.
    (ii) Jeopardy. Section 6330(f) does not require the Commissioner to 
provide the taxpayer with notification of the taxpayer's right to a CDP 
hearing prior to a levy when there has been a determination that 
collection of the tax is in jeopardy. However, the Commissioner will 
prescribe procedures to provide notice of the right to, and the 
opportunity for, a CDP hearing with Appeals to the taxpayer with 
respect to any such levy issued on or after January 19, 1999, within a 
reasonable time after the levy has occurred. The notification required 
to be given following a jeopardy levy also is referred to as post-levy 
CDP Notice.
    (3) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (a) as follows:
    Q-A1. Who is the person to be notified under section 6330?
    A-A1. Under section 6330(a)(1), a pre-levy or post-levy CDP Notice 
is required to be given only to the person whose property or right to 
property is intended to be levied upon, or, in the case of a levy made 
on a state tax refund or a jeopardy levy, the person whose property or 
right to property was levied upon. The person described in section 
6330(a)(1) is the same person described in section 6331(a)--i.e., the 
person liable to pay the tax due after notice and demand who refuses or 
neglects to pay (referred to here as the taxpayer). A pre-levy or post-
levy CDP Notice therefore will be given only to the taxpayer.
    Q-A2. Will the IRS give notification to a known nominee of, a 
person holding property of, or a person who holds property subject to a 
lien with respect to, the taxpayer of the IRS' intention to issue a 
levy?
    A-A2. No. Such a person is not the person described in section 
6331(a)(1), but such persons have other remedies. See A-B5 of paragraph 
(b)(2) of this section.
    Q-A3. Will the IRS give notification for each tax and tax period it 
intends to include or has included in a levy issued on or after January 
19, 1999?
    A-A3. Yes. The notification of an intent to levy or of the issuance 
of a jeopardy or state tax refund levy will specify each tax and tax 
period that will be or was included in the levy.
    Q-A4. Will the IRS give notification to a taxpayer with respect to 
levies for a tax and tax period issued on or after January 19, 1999, 
even though the IRS had issued a levy prior to January 19,

[[Page 2552]]

1999, with respect to the same tax and tax period?
    A-A4. Yes. The IRS will provide appropriate pre-levy or post-levy 
notification to a taxpayer regarding the first levy it intends to issue 
or has issued on or after January 19, 1999, with respect to a tax and 
tax period, even though it had issued a levy with respect to that same 
tax and tax period prior to January 19, 1999.
    Q-A5. When will the IRS provide this notice?
    A-A5. Beginning on January 19, 1999, the IRS will give a pre-levy 
CDP Notice to the taxpayer of the IRS' intent to levy on property or 
rights to property, other than in state tax refund and jeopardy levy 
situations, at least 30 days prior to the first such levy with respect 
to a tax and tax period. If the taxpayer has not received a pre-levy 
CDP Notice and the IRS levies on a state tax refund or issues a 
jeopardy levy on or after January 19, 1999, the IRS will provide a 
post-levy CDP Notice to the taxpayer within a reasonable time after 
that levy.
    Q-A6. What must a pre-levy CDP Notice include?
    A-A6. Pursuant to section 6330(a)(3), a pre-levy CDP Notice must 
include, in simple and nontechnical terms:
    (i) The amount of the unpaid tax.
    (ii) Notification of the right to request a CDP hearing.
    (iii) A statement that the IRS intends to levy.
    (iv) The taxpayer's rights with respect to the levy action, 
including a brief statement that sets forth--
    (A) The statutory provisions relating to the levy and sale of 
property;
    (B) The procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property;
    (C) The administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with 
respect to the levy and sale and the procedures relating to those 
appeals;
    (D) The alternatives available to taxpayers that could prevent levy 
on the property (including installment agreements); and
    (E) The statutory provisions and the procedures relating to the 
redemption of property and the release of liens on property.
    Q-A7. What must a post-levy CDP Notice include?
    A-A7. A post-levy CDP Notice must include, in simple and 
nontechnical terms:
    (i) The amount of the unpaid tax.
    (ii) Notification of the right to request a CDP hearing.
    (iii) A statement that the IRS has levied upon the taxpayer's state 
tax refund or has made a jeopardy levy on property or rights to 
property of the taxpayer, as appropriate.
    (iv) The taxpayer's rights with respect to the levy action, 
including a brief statement that sets forth--
    (A) The statutory provisions relating to the levy and sale of 
property;
    (B) The procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property;
    (C) The administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with 
respect to the levy and sale and the procedures relating to those 
appeals;
    (D) The alternatives available to taxpayers that could prevent any 
further levies on the taxpayer's property (including installment 
agreements); and
    (E) The statutory provisions and the procedures relating to the 
redemption of property and the release of liens on property.
    Q-A8. How will this pre-levy or post-levy notification under 
section 6330 be accomplished?
    A-A8. The IRS will notify the taxpayer by means of a pre-levy CDP 
Notice or a post-levy CDP Notice, as appropriate. The additional 
information the IRS is required to provide, together with Form 12153, 
Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, will be included with the 
CDP Notice.
    (i) The IRS may effect delivery of a pre-levy CDP Notice (and 
accompanying materials) in one of three ways:
    (A) By delivering the notice personally to the taxpayer.
    (B) By leaving the notice at the taxpayer's dwelling or usual place 
of business.
    (C) By mailing the notice to the taxpayer at the taxpayer's last 
known address by certified or registered mail, return receipt 
requested.
    (ii) The IRS may effect delivery of a post-levy CDP Notice (and 
accompanying materials) in one of three ways:
    (A) By delivering the notice personally to the taxpayer.
    (B) By leaving the notice at the taxpayer's dwelling or usual place 
of business.
    (C) By mailing the notice to the taxpayer at the taxpayer's last 
known address by certified or registered mail.
    Q-A9. What are the consequences if the taxpayer does not receive or 
accept the notification which was properly left at the taxpayer's 
dwelling or usual place of business, or properly sent by certified or 
registered mail, return receipt requested, to the taxpayer's last known 
address?
    A-A9. Notification properly sent to the taxpayer's last known 
address or left at the taxpayer's dwelling or usual place of business 
is sufficient to start the 30-day period within which the taxpayer may 
request a CDP hearing. See paragraph (c) of this section for when a 
request for a CDP hearing must be filed. Actual receipt is not a 
prerequisite to the validity of the CDP Notice.
    Q-A10. What if the taxpayer does not receive the CDP Notice because 
the IRS did not send that notice by certified or registered mail to the 
taxpayer's last known address, or failed to leave it at the dwelling or 
usual place of business of the taxpayer, and the taxpayer fails to 
request a CDP hearing with Appeals within the 30-day period commencing 
the day after the date of the CDP Notice?
    A-A10. When the IRS determines that it failed properly to provide a 
taxpayer with a CDP Notice, it will promptly provide the taxpayer with 
a substitute CDP Notice and provide the taxpayer with an opportunity to 
request a CDP hearing. Substitute CDP Notices are discussed in Q&A-B3 
of paragraph (b)(2) and Q&A-C8 of paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
    (4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of 
this paragraph (a):

    Example 1. Prior to January 19, 1999, the IRS issues a 
continuous levy on a taxpayer's wages and a levy on that taxpayer's 
fixed right to future payments. The IRS is not required to release 
either levy on or after January 19, 1999, until the requirements of 
section 6343(a)(1) are met. The taxpayer is not entitled to a CDP 
Notice or a CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to either 
levy because both levy actions were initiated prior to January 19, 
1999.
    Example 2. The same facts as in Example 1, except the IRS 
intends to levy upon a taxpayer's bank account on or after January 
19, 1999. The taxpayer is entitled to a pre-levy CDP Notice with 
respect to this proposed new levy.

    (b) Entitlement to a CDP hearing--(1) In general. A taxpayer is 
entitled to one CDP hearing with respect to the unpaid tax and tax 
periods covered by the pre-levy or post-levy CDP Notice provided to the 
taxpayer. The taxpayer must request the CDP hearing within the 30-day 
period commencing on the day after the date of the CDP Notice.
    (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (b) as follows:
    Q-B1. Is the taxpayer entitled to a CDP hearing where a levy for 
state tax refunds is issued on or after January 19, 1999, even though 
the IRS had previously issued other levies prior to January 19, 1999, 
seeking to collect the taxes owed for the same period?
    A-B1. Yes. The taxpayer is entitled to a CDP hearing under section 
6330 for the type of tax and tax periods set forth in the state tax 
refund levy issued on or after January 19, 1999.
    Q-B2. Is the taxpayer entitled to a CDP hearing when the IRS, more 
than

[[Page 2553]]

30 days after issuance of a CDP Notice under section 6330 with respect 
to the unpaid tax and periods, provides subsequent notice to that 
taxpayer that the IRS intends to levy on property or rights to property 
of the taxpayer for the same tax and tax periods shown on the CDP 
Notice?
    A-B2. No. Under section 6330, only the first pre-levy or post-levy 
CDP Notice with respect to the unpaid tax and tax periods entitles the 
taxpayer to request a CDP hearing. If the taxpayer does not timely 
request a CDP hearing with Appeals following that first notification, 
the taxpayer foregoes the right to a CDP hearing with Appeals and 
judicial review of Appeals' determination with respect to levies 
relating to that tax and tax period. The IRS generally provides 
additional notices or reminders (reminder notifications) to the 
taxpayer of its intent to levy when no collection action has occurred 
within 180 days of a proposed levy. Under such circumstances, a 
taxpayer may request an equivalent hearing as described in paragraph 
(i) of this section.
    Q-B3. When the IRS provides a taxpayer with a substitute CDP Notice 
and the taxpayer timely requests a CDP hearing, is the taxpayer 
entitled to a CDP Hearing before Appeals?
    A-B3. Yes. Unless the taxpayer provides the IRS a written 
withdrawal of the request that Appeals conduct a CDP hearing, the 
taxpayer is entitled to a CDP hearing before Appeals. Following the 
hearing, Appeals will issue a Notice of Determination, and the taxpayer 
is entitled to seek judicial review of that Notice of Determination.
    Q-B4. If the IRS sends a second CDP Notice under section 6330 
(other than a substitute CDP Notice) for a tax period and with respect 
to an unpaid tax for which a CDP Notice under section 6330 was 
previously sent, is the taxpayer entitled to a section 6330 CDP hearing 
based on the second CDP Notice?
    A-B4. No. The taxpayer is entitled to only one CDP hearing under 
section 6330 with respect to the tax and tax period. The taxpayer must 
request the CDP hearing within 30 days of the date of the first CDP 
Notice provided for that tax and tax period.
    Q-B5. Will the IRS give pre-levy or post-levy CDP Notices to known 
nominees of, persons holding property of, or persons holding property 
subject to a lien with respect to the taxpayer?
    A-B5. No. Such person is not the person described in section 
6331(a) and is, therefore, not entitled to a CDP hearing or an 
equivalent hearing (as discussed in paragraph (i) of this section). 
Such person, however, may seek reconsideration by the IRS office 
collecting the tax, assistance from the National Taxpayer Advocate, or 
an administrative hearing before Appeals under its Collection Appeals 
Program. However, any such administrative hearing would not be a CDP 
hearing under section 6330 and any determination or decision resulting 
from the hearing would not be subject to judicial review.
    (3) Example. The following example illustrates the principles of 
this paragraph (b):

    Example.  Federal income tax liability for 1997 is assessed 
against individual D. D buys an asset and puts it in individual E's 
name. The IRS gives D a CDP Notice of intent to levy with respect to 
the 1997 tax liability. The IRS will not notify E of its intent to 
levy. The IRS is not required to notify E of its intent to levy 
although E holds property of individual D. E is not the taxpayer.

    (c) Requesting a CDP hearing--(1) In general. When a taxpayer is 
entitled to a CDP hearing under section 6330, the CDP hearing must be 
requested during the 30-day period that commences the day after the 
date of the CDP Notice.
    (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (c) as follows:
    Q-C1. What must a taxpayer do to obtain a CDP hearing?
    A-C1. (i) The taxpayer must make a request in writing for a CDP 
hearing. A written request in any form which requests a CDP hearing 
will be acceptable. The request must include the taxpayer's name, 
address, and daytime telephone number, and must be signed by the 
taxpayer or the taxpayer's authorized representative and dated. The CDP 
Notice should include, when appropriate, a Form 12153, Request for a 
Collection Due Process Hearing, that can be used by the taxpayer to 
request a CDP hearing.
    (ii) The Form 12153 requests the following information:
    (A) The taxpayer's name, address, daytime telephone number, and 
taxpayer identification number (SSN or TIN).
    (B) The type of tax involved.
    (C) The tax period at issue.
    (D) A statement that the taxpayer requests a hearing with Appeals 
concerning the proposed collection activity.
    (E) The reason or reasons why the taxpayer disagrees with the 
proposed collection action.
    (iii) Taxpayers are encouraged to use a Form 12153 in requesting a 
CDP hearing so that the request can be readily identified and forwarded 
to Appeals. Taxpayers may obtain a copy of Form 12153 by contacting the 
IRS office that issued the CDP Notice or by calling, toll-free, 1-800-
829-3676.
    (iv) The taxpayer may perfect any timely written request for a CDP 
hearing, which otherwise meets the requirements set forth above and 
which is made or alleged to have been made on the taxpayer's behalf by 
the taxpayer's spouse or any other representative, by filing, within a 
reasonable time of a request from Appeals, a signed written affirmation 
that the request was originally submitted on the taxpayer's behalf.
    Q-C2. Must the request for the CDP hearing be in writing?
    A-C2. Yes. There are several reasons why the request for a CDP 
hearing must be in writing. The filing of a timely request for a CDP 
hearing is the first step in what may result in a court proceeding. A 
written request will provide proof that the CDP hearing was requested 
and thus permit the court to verify that it has jurisdiction over any 
subsequent appeal of the Notice of Determination issued by Appeals. In 
addition, the receipt of the written request will establish the date on 
which the periods of limitation under section 6502 (relating to 
collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal 
prosecutions), and section 6532 (relating to suits) are suspended as a 
result of the CDP hearing and any judicial appeal. Moreover, because 
the IRS anticipates that taxpayers will contact the IRS office that 
issued the CDP Notice for further information or assistance in filling 
out Form 12153, or to attempt to resolve their liabilities prior to 
going through the CDP hearing process, the requirement of a written 
request should help prevent any misunderstanding as to whether a CDP 
hearing has been requested. If the information requested on Form 12153 
is furnished by the taxpayer, the written request also will help to 
establish the issues for which the taxpayer seeks a determination by 
Appeals.
    Q-C3. When must a taxpayer request a CDP hearing with respect to a 
CDP Notice issued under section 6330?
    A-C3. A taxpayer must submit a written request for a CDP hearing 
within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date of the CDP 
Notice issued under section 6330. This period is slightly different 
from the period for submitting a written request for a CDP hearing with 
respect to a CDP Notice issued under section 6320. For a CDP Notice 
issued under section 6320, a taxpayer must submit a written request for 
a CDP hearing within the 30-day period commencing the day after the end 
of the five business day period

[[Page 2554]]

following the filing of the notice of federal tax lien (NFTL).
    Q-C4. How will the timeliness of a taxpayer's written request for a 
CDP hearing be determined?
    A-C4. The rules and regulations under section 7502 and section 7503 
will apply to determine the timeliness of the taxpayer's request for a 
CDP hearing, if properly transmitted and addressed as provided in A-C6 
of this paragraph (c)(2).
    Q-C5. Is the 30-day period within which a taxpayer must make a 
request for a CDP hearing extended because the taxpayer resides outside 
the United States?
    A-C5. No. Section 6330 does not make provision for such a 
circumstance. Accordingly, all taxpayers who want a CDP hearing under 
section 6330 must request such a hearing within the 30-day period 
commencing the day after the date of the CDP Notice.
    Q-C6. Where should the written request for a CDP hearing be sent?
    A-C6. The written request for a CDP hearing must be sent, or hand 
delivered, to the IRS office that issued the CDP Notice at the address 
indicated on the CDP Notice. If the address of that office does not 
appear on the CDP notice, the request must be sent, or hand delivered, 
to the compliance area director, or his or her successor, serving the 
compliance area in which the taxpayer resides or has its principal 
place of business. If the taxpayer does not have a residence or 
principal place of business in the United States, the request must be 
sent, or hand delivered, to the compliance director, Philadelphia 
Submission Processing Center, or his or her successor. Taxpayers may 
obtain the address of the appropriate person to which the written 
request should be sent or hand delivered by calling, toll-free, 1-800-
829-1040 and providing their taxpayer identification number (SSN or 
TIN).
    Q-C7. What will happen if the taxpayer does not request a CDP 
hearing in writing within the 30-day period commencing on the day after 
the date of the CDP Notice issued under section 6330?
    A-C7. If the taxpayer does not request a CDP hearing with Appeals 
within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date of the CDP 
Notice, the taxpayer will forego the right to a CDP hearing under 
section 6330 with respect to the unpaid tax and tax periods shown on 
the CDP Notice. The taxpayer may, however, request an equivalent 
hearing. See paragraph (i) of this section.
    Q-C8. When must a taxpayer request a CDP hearing with respect to a 
substitute CDP Notice?
    A-C8. A CDP hearing with respect to a substitute CDP Notice must be 
requested in writing by the taxpayer prior to the end of the 30-day 
period commencing the day after the date of the substitute CDP Notice.
    Q-C9. Can taxpayers attempt to resolve the matter of the proposed 
levy with an officer or employee of the IRS office collecting the tax 
liability stated on the CDP Notice either before or after requesting a 
CDP hearing?
    A-C9. Yes. Taxpayers are encouraged to discuss their concerns with 
the IRS office collecting the tax, either before or after they request 
a CDP hearing. If such a discussion occurs before a request is made for 
a CDP hearing, the matter may be resolved without the need for Appeals 
consideration. However, these discussions do not suspend the running of 
the 30-day period within which the taxpayer is required to request a 
CDP hearing, nor do they extend that 30-day period. If discussions 
occur after the request for a CDP hearing is filed and the taxpayer 
resolves the matter with the IRS office collecting the tax, the 
taxpayer may withdraw in writing the request that a CDP hearing be 
conducted by Appeals. The taxpayer can also waive in writing some or 
all of the requirements regarding the contents of the Notice of 
Determination.
    (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of 
this paragraph (c):

    Example 1. The IRS mails a CDP Notice of intent to levy to 
individual A's last known address on June 24, 1999. Individual A has 
until July 26, 1999, a Monday, to request a CDP hearing. The 30-day 
period within which individual A may request a CDP hearing begins on 
June 25, 1999. Because the 30-day period expires on July 24, 1999, a 
Saturday, individual A's written request for a CDP hearing will be 
considered timely if it is properly transmitted and addressed to the 
IRS in accordance with section 7502 and the regulations thereunder 
no later than July 26, 1999.
    Example 2.  Same facts as in Example 1, except that individual A 
is on vacation, outside the United States, or otherwise does not 
receive or read the CDP Notice until July 19, 1999. As in Example 1, 
individual A has until July 26, 1999, to request a CDP hearing. If 
individual A does not request a CDP hearing, individual A may 
request an equivalent hearing as to the levy at a later time. The 
taxpayer should make a request for an equivalent hearing at the 
earliest possible time.
    Example 3.  Same facts as in Example 2, except that individual A 
does not receive or read the CDP Notice until after July 26, 1999, 
and does not request a hearing by July 26, 1999. Individual A is not 
entitled to a CDP hearing. Individual A may request an equivalent 
hearing as to the levy at a later time. The taxpayer should make a 
request for an equivalent hearing at the earliest possible time.
    Example 4.  Same facts as in Example 1, except the IRS 
determines that the CDP Notice mailed on June 24, 1999, was not 
mailed to individual A's last known address. As soon as practicable 
after making this determination, the IRS will mail a substitute CDP 
Notice to individual A at individual A's last known address, hand 
deliver the substitute CDP Notice to individual A, or leave the 
substitute CDP Notice at individual A's dwelling or usual place of 
business. Individual A will have 30 days commencing on the day after 
the date of the substitute CDP Notice within which to request a CDP 
hearing.

    (d) Conduct of CDP hearing--(1) In general. If a taxpayer requests 
a CDP hearing under section 6330(a)(3)(B) (and does not withdraw that 
request), the CDP hearing will be held with Appeals. The taxpayer is 
entitled to only one CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to the 
unpaid tax and tax periods shown on the CDP Notice. To the extent 
practicable, the CDP hearing requested under section 6330 will be held 
in conjunction with any CDP hearing the taxpayer requests under section 
6320. A CDP hearing will be conducted by an employee or officer of 
Appeals who, prior to the first CDP hearing under section 6320 or 
section 6330, has had no involvement with respect to the tax for the 
tax periods to be covered by the hearing, unless the taxpayer waives 
this requirement.
    (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (d) as follows:
    Q-D1. Under what circumstances can a taxpayer receive more than one 
pre-levy CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to a tax period?
    A-D1. The taxpayer may receive more than one CDP pre-levy hearing 
under section 6330 with respect to a tax period where the tax involved 
is a different type of tax (for example, an employment tax liability, 
where the original CDP hearing for the tax period involved an income 
tax liability), or where the same type of tax for the same period is 
involved, but where the amount of the unpaid tax has changed as a 
result of an additional assessment of tax (not including interest or 
penalties) for that period or an additional accuracy-related or filing-
delinquency penalty has been assessed. The taxpayer is not entitled to 
another CDP hearing under section 6330 if the additional assessment 
represents accruals of interest, accruals of penalties, or both.
    Q-D2. Will a CDP hearing with respect to one tax period be combined 
with a CDP hearing with respect to another tax period?

[[Page 2555]]

    A-D2. To the extent practicable, a CDP hearing with respect to one 
tax period shown on a CDP Notice will be combined with any and all 
other CDP hearings which the taxpayer has requested.
    Q-D3. Will a CDP hearing under section 6330 be combined with a CDP 
hearing under section 6320?
    A-D3. To the extent it is practicable, a CDP hearing under section 
6330 will be held in conjunction with a CDP hearing under section 6320.
    Q-D4. What is considered to be prior involvement by an employee or 
officer of Appeals with respect to the tax and tax period or periods 
involved in the hearing?
    A-D4. Prior involvement by an employee or officer of Appeals 
includes participation or involvement in an Appeals hearing (other than 
a CDP hearing held under either section 6320 or section 6330) that the 
taxpayer may have had with respect to the tax and tax periods shown on 
the CDP Notice.
    Q-D5. How can a taxpayer waive the requirement that the officer or 
employee of Appeals have no prior involvement with respect to the tax 
and tax period or periods involved in the CDP hearing?
    A-D5. The taxpayer must sign a written waiver.
    Q-D6. How are CDP hearings conducted?
    A-D6. The formal hearing procedures required under the 
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., do not apply to CDP 
hearings. CDP hearings are much like Collection Appeal Program (CAP) 
hearings in that they are informal in nature and do not require the 
Appeals officer or employee and the taxpayer, or the taxpayer's 
representative, to hold a face-to-face meeting. A CDP hearing may, but 
is not required to, consist of a face-to-face meeting, one or more 
written or oral communications between an Appeals officer or employee 
and the taxpayer or the taxpayer's representative, or some combination 
thereof. A transcript or recording of any face-to-face meeting or 
conversation between an Appeals officer or employee and the taxpayer or 
the taxpayer's representative is not required. The taxpayer or the 
taxpayer's representative does not have the right to subpoena and 
examine witnesses at a CDP hearing.
    Q-D7. If a taxpayer wants a face-to-face CDP hearing, where will it 
be held?
    A-D7. The taxpayer must be offered an opportunity for a hearing at 
the Appeals office closest to taxpayer's residence or, in the case of a 
business taxpayer, the taxpayer's principal place of business. If that 
is not satisfactory to the taxpayer, the taxpayer will be given an 
opportunity for a hearing by correspondence or by telephone. If that is 
not satisfactory to the taxpayer, the Appeals officer or employee will 
review the taxpayer's request for a CDP hearing, the case file, any 
other written communications from the taxpayer (including written 
communications, if any, submitted in connection with the CDP hearing), 
and any notes of any oral communications with the taxpayer or the 
taxpayer's representative. Under such circumstances, review of those 
documents will constitute the CDP hearing for the purposes of section 
6330(b).
    (e) Matters considered at CDP hearing--(1) In general. Appeals has 
the authority to determine the validity, sufficiency, and timeliness of 
any CDP Notice given by the IRS and of any request for a CDP hearing 
that is made by a taxpayer. Prior to issuance of a determination, the 
hearing officer is required to obtain verification from the IRS office 
collecting the tax that the requirements of any applicable law or 
administrative procedure have been met. The taxpayer may raise any 
relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax at the hearing, including 
appropriate spousal defenses, challenges to the appropriateness of the 
proposed collection action, and offers of collection alternatives. The 
taxpayer also may raise challenges to the existence or amount of the 
tax liability specified on the CDP Notice for any tax period shown on 
the CDP Notice if the taxpayer did not receive a statutory notice of 
deficiency for that tax liability or did not otherwise have an 
opportunity to dispute that tax liability. Finally, the taxpayer may 
not raise an issue that was raised and considered at a previous CDP 
hearing under section 6320 or in any other previous administrative or 
judicial proceeding if the taxpayer participated meaningfully in such 
hearing or proceeding. Taxpayers will be expected to provide all 
relevant information requested by Appeals, including financial 
statements, for its consideration of the facts and issues involved in 
the hearing.
    (2) Spousal defenses. A taxpayer may raise any appropriate spousal 
defenses at a CDP hearing unless the Commissioner has already made a 
final determination as to spousal defenses in a statutory notice of 
deficiency or final determination letter. To claim a spousal defense 
under section 66 or section 6015, the taxpayer must do so in writing 
according to rules prescribed by the Commissioner or the Secretary. 
Spousal defenses raised under sections 66 and 6015 in a CDP hearing are 
governed in all respects by the provisions of sections 66 and section 
6015 and the regulations and procedures thereunder.
    (3) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (e) as follows:
    Q-E1. What factors will Appeals consider in making its 
determination?
    A-E1. Appeals will consider the following matters in making its 
determination:
    (i) Whether the IRS met the requirements of any applicable law or 
administrative procedure.
    (ii) Any issues appropriately raised by the taxpayer relating to 
the unpaid tax.
    (iii) Any appropriate spousal defenses raised by the taxpayer.
    (iv) Any challenges made by the taxpayer to the appropriateness of 
the proposed collection action.
    (v) Any offers by the taxpayer for collection alternatives.
    (vi) Whether the proposed collection action balances the need for 
the efficient collection of taxes and the legitimate concern of the 
taxpayer that any collection action be no more intrusive than 
necessary.
    Q-E2. When is a taxpayer entitled to challenge the existence or 
amount of the tax liability specified in the CDP Notice?
    A-E2. A taxpayer is entitled to challenge the existence or amount 
of the tax liability specified in the CDP Notice if the taxpayer did 
not receive a statutory notice of deficiency for such liability or did 
not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such liability. Receipt of 
a statutory notice of deficiency for this purpose means receipt in time 
to petition the Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiency 
asserted in the notice of deficiency. An opportunity to dispute a 
liability includes a prior opportunity for a conference with Appeals 
that was offered either before or after the assessment of the 
liability.
    Q-E3. Are spousal defenses subject to the limitations imposed under 
section 6330(c)(2)(B) on a taxpayer's right to challenge the tax 
liability specified in the CDP Notice at a CDP hearing?
    A-E3. The limitations imposed under section 6330(c)(2)(B) do not 
apply to spousal defenses. When a taxpayer asserts a spousal defense, 
the taxpayer is not disputing the amount or existence of the liability 
itself, but asserting a defense to the liability which may or may not 
be disputed. A spousal defense raised under section 66 or section 6015 
is governed by section 66 or section 6015 and the regulations and 
procedures thereunder. Any limitation under those sections, 
regulations, and procedures therefore will apply.

[[Page 2556]]

    Q-E4. May a taxpayer raise at a CDP hearing a spousal defense under 
section 66 or section 6015 if that defense was raised and considered 
administratively and the Commissioner has issued a statutory notice of 
deficiency or final determination letter addressing the spousal 
defense?
    A-E4. No. A taxpayer is precluded from raising a spousal defense at 
a CDP hearing when the Commissioner has made a final determination 
(under section 66 or section 6015) as to spousal defenses in a final 
determination letter or statutory notice of deficiency. However, a 
taxpayer may raise spousal defenses in a CDP hearing when the taxpayer 
has previously raised spousal defenses, but the Commissioner has not 
yet made a final determination regarding this issue.
    Q-E5. May a taxpayer raise at a CDP hearing a spousal defense under 
section 66 or section 6015 if that defense was raised and considered in 
a prior judicial proceeding that has become final?
    A-E5. No. A taxpayer is precluded by the doctrine of res judicata 
and by the specific limitations under section 66 or section 6015 from 
raising a spousal defense in a CDP hearing under these circumstances.
    Q-E6. What collection alternatives are available to the taxpayer?
    A-E6. Collection alternatives would include, for example, a 
proposal to withhold the proposed or future collection action in 
circumstances that will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, 
an installment agreement, an offer-in-compromise, the posting of a 
bond, or the substitution of other assets.
    Q-E7. What issues may a taxpayer raise in a CDP hearing under 
section 6330 if the taxpayer previously received a notice under section 
6320 with respect to the same tax and tax period and did not request a 
CDP hearing with respect to that notice?
    A-E7. The taxpayer may raise appropriate spousal defenses, 
challenges to the appropriateness of the proposed collection action, 
and offers of collection alternatives. The existence or amount of the 
tax liability for the tax for the tax period specified in the CDP 
Notice may be challenged only if the taxpayer did not already have an 
opportunity to dispute that tax liability. Where the taxpayer 
previously received a CDP Notice under section 6320 with respect to the 
same tax and tax period and did not request a CDP hearing with respect 
to that earlier CDP Notice, the taxpayer already had an opportunity to 
dispute the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability.
    Q-E8. How will Appeals issue its determination?
    A-E8. (i) Taxpayers will be sent a dated Notice of Determination by 
certified or registered mail. The Notice of Determination will set 
forth Appeals' findings and decisions. It will state whether the IRS 
met the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure; 
it will resolve any issues appropriately raised by the taxpayer 
relating to the unpaid tax; it will include a decision on any 
appropriate spousal defenses raised by the taxpayer; it will include a 
decision on any challenges made by the taxpayer to the appropriateness 
of the collection action; it will respond to any offers by the taxpayer 
for collection alternatives; and it will address whether the proposed 
collection action represents a balance between the need for the 
efficient collection of taxes and the legitimate concern of the 
taxpayer that any collection action be no more intrusive than 
necessary. The Notice of Determination will also set forth any 
agreements that Appeals reached with the taxpayer, any relief given the 
taxpayer, and any actions the taxpayer or the IRS are required to take. 
Lastly, the Notice of Determination will advise the taxpayer of the 
taxpayer's right to seek judicial review within 30 days of the date of 
the Notice of Determination.
    (ii) Because taxpayers are encouraged to discuss their concerns 
with the IRS office collecting the tax, certain matters that might have 
been raised at a CDP hearing may be resolved without the need for 
Appeals consideration. Unless, as a result of these discussions, the 
taxpayer agrees in writing to withdraw the request that Appeals conduct 
a CDP hearing, Appeals will still issue a Notice of Determination, but 
the taxpayer can waive in writing Appeals' consideration of some or all 
of the matters it would otherwise consider in making its determination.
    Q-E9. Is there a period of time within which Appeals must conduct a 
CDP hearing or issue a Notice of Determination?
    A-E9. No. Appeals will, however, attempt to conduct a CDP hearing 
and issue a Notice of Determination as expeditiously as possible under 
the circumstances.
    Q-E10. Why is the Notice of Determination and its date important?
    A-E10. The Notice of Determination will set forth Appeals' findings 
and decisions with respect to the matters set forth in A-E1 of this 
paragraph (e)(3). The 30-day period within which the taxpayer is 
permitted to seek judicial review of Appeals' determination commences 
the day after the date of the Notice of Determination.
    Q-E11. If an Appeals officer considers the merits of a taxpayer's 
liability in a CDP hearing when the taxpayer had previously received a 
statutory notice of deficiency or otherwise had an opportunity to 
dispute the liability prior to the issuance of a notice of intention to 
levy, will the Appeals officer's determination regarding those 
liability issues be considered part of the Notice of Determination?
    A-E11. No. An Appeals officer may consider the existence and amount 
of the underlying tax liability as a part of the CDP hearing only if 
the taxpayer did not receive a statutory notice of deficiency for the 
tax liability in question or otherwise have a prior opportunity to 
dispute the tax liability. Similarly, an Appeals officer may not 
consider any other issue if the issue was raised and considered at a 
previous hearing under section 6320 or in any other previous 
administrative or judicial proceeding in which the person seeking to 
raise the issue meaningfully participated. In the Appeals officer's 
sole discretion, however, the Appeals officer may consider the 
existence or amount of the underlying tax liability, or such other 
precluded issues, at the same time as the CDP hearing. Any 
determination, however, made by the Appeals officer with respect to 
such a precluded issue shall not be treated as part of the Notice of 
Determination issued by the Appeals officer and will not be subject to 
any judicial review. Because any decision made by the Appeals officer 
on such precluded issues is not properly a part of the CDP hearing, 
such decisions are not required to appear in the Notice of 
Determination issued following the hearing. Even if a decision 
concerning such precluded issues is referred to in the Notice of 
Determination, it is not reviewable by a district court or the Tax 
Court because the precluded issue is not properly part of the CDP 
hearing.
    (4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of 
this paragraph (e):

    Example 1. The IRS sends a statutory notice of deficiency to the 
taxpayer at his last known address asserting a deficiency for the 
tax year 1995. The taxpayer receives the notice of deficiency in 
time to petition the Tax Court for a redetermination of the asserted 
deficiency. The taxpayer does not timely file a petition with the 
Tax Court. The taxpayer is precluded from challenging the existence 
or amount of the tax liability in a subsequent CDP hearing.
    Example 2. Same facts as in Example 1, except the taxpayer does 
not receive the notice of deficiency in time to petition the Tax 
Court and did not have another prior opportunity to dispute the tax 
liability. The taxpayer is not precluded from challenging

[[Page 2557]]

the existence or amount of the tax liability in a subsequent CDP 
hearing.
    Example 3. The IRS properly assesses a trust fund recovery 
penalty against the taxpayer. The IRS offers the taxpayer the 
opportunity for a conference with Appeals at which the taxpayer 
would have the opportunity to dispute the assessed liability. The 
taxpayer declines the opportunity to participate in such a 
conference. The taxpayer is precluded from challenging the existence 
or amount of the tax liability in a subsequent CDP hearing.

    (f) Judicial review of Notice of Determination--(1) In general. 
Unless the taxpayer provides the IRS a written withdrawal of the 
request that Appeals conduct a CDP hearing, Appeals is required to 
issue a Notice of Determination in all cases where a taxpayer has 
timely requested a CDP hearing. The taxpayer may appeal such 
determinations made by Appeals within the 30-day period commencing the 
day after the date of the Notice of Determination to the Tax Court or a 
district court of the United States, as appropriate.
    (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (f) as follows:
    Q-F1. What must a taxpayer do to obtain judicial review of a Notice 
of Determination?
    A-F1. Subject to the jurisdictional limitations described in A-F2, 
the taxpayer must, within the 30-day period commencing the day after 
the date of the Notice of Determination, appeal the determination by 
Appeals to the Tax Court or to a district court of the United States.
    Q-F2. With respect to the relief available to the taxpayer under 
section 6015, what is the time frame within which a taxpayer may seek 
Tax Court review of Appeals' determination following a CDP hearing?
    A-F2. If the taxpayer seeks Tax Court review not only of Appeals' 
denial of relief under section 6015, but also of relief with respect to 
other issues raised in the CDP hearing, the taxpayer should request Tax 
Court review within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date 
of the Notice of Determination. If the taxpayer only seeks Tax Court 
review of Appeals' denial of relief under section 6015, the taxpayer 
should request review by the Tax Court, as provided by section 6015(e), 
within 90 days of Appeals' determination. If a request for Tax Court 
review is filed after the 30-day period for seeking judicial review 
under section 6330, then only the taxpayer's section 6015 claims may be 
reviewable by the Tax Court.
    Q-F3. Where should a taxpayer direct a request for judicial review 
of a Notice of Determination?
    A-F3. If the Tax Court would have jurisdiction over the type of tax 
specified in the CDP Notice (for example, income and estate taxes), 
then the taxpayer must seek judicial review by the Tax Court. If the 
tax liability arises from a type of tax over which the Tax Court would 
not have jurisdiction, then the taxpayer must seek judicial review by a 
district court of the United States in accordance with Title 28 of the 
United States Code.
    Q-F4. What happens if the taxpayer timely appeals Appeals' 
determination to the incorrect court?
    A-F4. If the court to which the taxpayer directed a timely appeal 
of the Notice of Determination determines that the appeal was to the 
incorrect court (because of jurisdictional, venue or other reasons), 
the taxpayer will have 30 days after the court's determination to that 
effect within which to file an appeal to the correct court.
    Q-F5. What issue or issues may the taxpayer raise before the Tax 
Court or before a district court if the taxpayer disagrees with the 
Notice of Determination?
    A-F5. In seeking Tax Court or district court review of Appeals' 
Notice of Determination, the taxpayer can only ask the court to 
consider an issue that was raised in the taxpayer's CDP hearing.
    (g) Effect of request for CDP hearing and judicial review on 
periods of limitation and collection activity--(1) In general. The 
periods of limitation under section 6502 (relating to collection after 
assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), and 
section 6532 (relating to suits) are suspended until the date the IRS 
receives the taxpayer's written withdrawal of the request for a CDP 
hearing by Appeals or the determination resulting from the CDP hearing 
becomes final by expiration of the time for seeking judicial review or 
the exhaustion of any rights to appeals following judicial review. In 
no event shall any of these periods of limitation expire before the 
90th day after the date on which the IRS receives the taxpayer's 
written withdrawal of the request that Appeals conduct a CDP hearing or 
the Notice of Determination with respect to such hearing becomes final 
upon either the expiration of the time for seeking judicial review or 
upon exhaustion of any rights to appeals following judicial review.
    (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (g) as follows:
    Q-G1. For what period of time will the periods of limitation under 
section 6502, section 6531, and section 6532 remain suspended if the 
taxpayer timely requests a CDP hearing concerning a pre-levy or post-
levy CDP Notice?
    A-G1. The suspension period commences on the date the IRS receives 
the taxpayer's written request for a CDP hearing. The suspension period 
continues until the IRS receives a written withdrawal by the taxpayer 
of the request for a CDP hearing or the Notice of Determination 
resulting from the CDP hearing becomes final upon either the expiration 
of the time for seeking judicial review or upon exhaustion of any 
rights to appeals following judicial review. In no event shall any of 
these periods of limitation expire before the 90th day after the day on 
which there is a final determination with respect to such hearing. The 
periods of limitation that are suspended under section 6330 are those 
which apply to the taxes and the tax period or periods to which the CDP 
Notice relates.
    Q-G2. For what period of time will the periods of limitation under 
section 6502, section 6531, and section 6532 be suspended if the 
taxpayer does not request a CDP hearing concerning the CDP Notice, or 
the taxpayer requests a CDP hearing, but his request is not timely?
    A-G2. Under either of these circumstances, section 6330 does not 
provide for a suspension of the periods of limitation.
    Q-G3. What, if any, enforcement actions can the IRS take during the 
suspension period?
    A-G3. Section 6330(e) provides for the suspension of the periods of 
limitation discussed in paragraph (g)(1) of these regulations. Section 
6330(e) also provides that levy actions that are the subject of the 
requested CDP hearing under that section shall be suspended during the 
same period. The IRS, however, may levy for other taxes and periods not 
covered by the CDP Notice if the CDP requirements under section 6330 
for those taxes and periods have been satisfied. The IRS also may file 
NFTLs for tax periods and taxes, whether or not covered by the CDP 
Notice issued under section 6330, and may take other non-levy 
collection actions such as initiating judicial proceedings to collect 
the tax shown on the CDP Notice or offsetting overpayments from other 
periods, or of other taxes, against the tax shown on the CDP Notice. 
Moreover, the provisions in section 6330 do not apply when the IRS 
levies for the tax and tax period shown

[[Page 2558]]

on the CDP Notice to collect a state tax refund due the taxpayer, or 
determines that collection of the tax is in jeopardy. Finally, section 
6330 does not prohibit the IRS from accepting any voluntary payments 
made for the tax and tax period stated on the CDP Notice.
    (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of 
this paragraph (g):
    Example 1. The period of limitation under section 6502 with 
respect to the taxpayer's tax period listed in the CDP Notice will 
expire on August 1, 1999. The IRS sent a CDP Notice to the taxpayer 
on April 30, 1999. The taxpayer timely requested a CDP hearing. The 
IRS received this request on May 15, 1999. Appeals sends the 
taxpayer its determination on June 15, 1999. The taxpayer timely 
seeks judicial review of that determination. The period of 
limitation under section 6502 would be suspended from May 15, 1999, 
until the determination resulting from that hearing becomes final by 
expiration of the time for seeking review or reconsideration before 
the appropriate court, plus 90 days.
    Example 2. Same facts as in Example 1, except the taxpayer does 
not seek judicial review of Appeals' determination. Because the 
taxpayer requested the CDP hearing when fewer than 90 days remained 
on the period of limitation, the period of limitation will be 
extended to October 13, 1999 (90 days from July 15, 1999).

    (h) Retained jurisdiction of Appeals--(1) In general. The Appeals 
office that makes a determination under section 6330 retains 
jurisdiction over that determination, including any subsequent 
administrative hearings that may be requested by the taxpayer regarding 
levies and any collection actions taken or proposed with respect to 
Appeals' determination. Once a taxpayer has exhausted his other 
remedies, Appeals' retained jurisdiction permits it to consider whether 
a change in the taxpayer's circumstances affects its original 
determination. Where a taxpayer alleges a change in circumstances that 
affects Appeals' original determination, Appeals may consider whether 
changed circumstances warrant a change in its earlier determination.
    (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (h) as follows:
    Q-H1. Are the periods of limitation suspended during the course of 
any subsequent Appeals consideration of the matters raised by a 
taxpayer when the taxpayer invokes the retained jurisdiction of Appeals 
under section 6330(d)(2)(A) or (B)?
    A-H1. No. Under section 6330(b)(2), a taxpayer is entitled to only 
one CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to the tax and tax 
periods specified in the CDP Notice. Any subsequent consideration by 
Appeals pursuant to its retained jurisdiction is not a continuation of 
the original CDP hearing and does not suspend the periods of 
limitation.
    Q-H2. Is a decision of Appeals resulting from a retained 
jurisdiction hearing appealable to the Tax Court or a district court?
    A-H2. No. As discussed in A-H1, a taxpayer is entitled to only one 
CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to the tax and tax period 
or periods specified in the CDP Notice. Only determinations resulting 
from CDP hearings are appealable to the Tax Court or a district court.
    (i) Equivalent hearing--(1) In general. A taxpayer who fails to 
make a timely request for a CDP hearing is not entitled to a CDP 
hearing. Such a taxpayer may nevertheless request an administrative 
hearing with Appeals, which is referred to herein as an ``equivalent 
hearing.'' The equivalent hearing will be held by Appeals and generally 
will follow Appeals procedures for a CDP hearing. Appeals will not, 
however, issue a Notice of Determination. Under such circumstances, 
Appeals will issue a Decision Letter.
    (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers illustrate the 
provisions of this paragraph (i) as follows:
    Q-I1. What issues will Appeals consider at an equivalent hearing?
    A-I1. In an equivalent hearing, Appeals will consider the same 
issues that it would have considered at a CDP hearing on the same 
matter.
    Q-I2. Are the periods of limitation under sections 6502, 6531, and 
6532 suspended if the taxpayer does not timely request a CDP hearing 
and is subsequently given an equivalent hearing?
    A-I2. No. The suspension period provided for in section 6330(e) 
relates only to hearings requested within the 30-day period that 
commences the day following the date of the pre-levy or post-levy CDP 
Notice, that is, CDP hearings.
    Q-I3. Will collection action be suspended if a taxpayer requests 
and receives an equivalent hearing?
    A-I3. Collection action is not required to be suspended. 
Accordingly, the decision to take collection action during the pendency 
of an equivalent hearing will be determined on a case-by-case basis. 
Appeals may request the IRS office with responsibility for collecting 
the taxes to suspend all or some collection action or to take other 
appropriate action if it determines that such action is appropriate or 
necessary under the circumstances.
    Q-I4. What will the Decision Letter state?
    A-I4. The Decision Letter will generally contain the same 
information as a Notice of Determination.
    Q-I5. Will a taxpayer be able to obtain court review of a decision 
made by Appeals with respect to an equivalent hearing?
    A-I5. Section 6330 does not authorize a taxpayer to appeal the 
decision of Appeals with respect to an equivalent hearing. A taxpayer 
may under certain circumstances be able to seek Tax Court review of 
Appeals' denial of relief under section 6015. Such review must be 
sought within 90 days of the issuance of Appeals' determination on 
those issues, as provided by section 6015(e).
    (j) Effective date. This section is applicable with respect to any 
levy which occurs on or after January 19, 1999.


Sec. 301.6330-1T  [Removed]

    3. Section 301.6330-1T is removed.

Robert E. Wenzel,
Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
    Approved: January 14, 2002.
Mark A. Weinberger,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 02-1305 Filed 1-17-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P