[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 579-580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP02-53-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, Dominion Transmission, 
Inc.; Notice of Application

December 28, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 13, 2001, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel), 10 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York 
14203 and Dominion Transmission, Inc. (Dominion), 445 West Main Street, 
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301, filed a joint application pursuant to 
section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and part 157 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations for a certificate of public convenience and necessity 
to construct and operate facilities that will increase capacity on the 
jointly-owned Ellisburg, Pennsylvania to Leidy, Pennsylvania pipeline 
(Ellisburg-Leidy Line) all as more fully set forth in the application 
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket#'' and 
follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Specifically, the applicants seek authorization to: (1) Install a 
new 8,010 horsepower compressor unit at National Fuel's Ellisburg 
Compressor Station in Potter County, Pennsylvania, (2) uprate the 
maximum allowable operating pressure of the jointly-owned pipeline 
(downstream of the Ellisburg Compressor Station) above the current 
level of 1405 psig, and (3) modify the Leidy M&R Station in Clinton 
County, Pennsylvania. The applicants state that these facility 
additions would allow an additional 150,000 Dth per day of firm 
capacity to the Ellisburg-Leidy Line. Of this total, 130,000 Dth per 
day of capacity would be allocated to National Fuel and 20,000 Dth per 
day would be allocated to Dominion. The applicants state that this 
incremental capacity, along with other capacity owned by Dominion and 
National Fuel, will be leased to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee). The leases are the subject of other jointly-filed 
applications.\1\ The estimated cost of the proposed facilities is $9.4 
million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The lease between Tennessee and Dominion is the subject of 
Docket No. CP02-47-000. The lease between Tennessee and National 
Fuel is the subject of Docket No. CP02-48-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to David 
W. Reitz, Assistant General Counsel, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation, 10 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York 14203 at 716-857-
7949 or by E-mail at [email protected] and Sean R. Sleigh, 
Certificates Manager, Dominion Transmission, Inc., 445 West Main 
Street, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301 at 304-627-3462 or by E-mail at 
[email protected].
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of 
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by 
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or 
before January 18, 2002, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a motion to 
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's rules 
of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the 
regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary 
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the 
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of 
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant 
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the 
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the 
proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have 
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with 
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and 
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. 
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will 
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's 
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project 
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly 
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of 
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments 
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be 
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive 
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings

[[Page 580]]

associated with the Commission's environmental review process. 
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed 
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will 
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by 
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents 
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court 
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non-
environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the 
environmental aspects of the project. This preliminary determination 
typically considers such issues as the need for the project and its 
economic effect on existing customers of the applicant, on other 
pipelines in the area, and on landowners and communities. For example, 
the Commission considers the extent to which the applicant may need to 
exercise eminent domain to obtain rights-of-way for the proposed 
project and balances that against the non-environmental benefits to be 
provided by the project. Therefore, if a person has comments on 
community and landowner impacts from this proposal, it is important 
either to file comments or to intervene as early in the process as 
possible.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically 
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site under the ``e-Filing'' 
link.
    If the Commission decides to set the application for a formal 
hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Commission will issue 
another notice describing that process. At the end of the Commission's 
review process, a final Commission order approving or denying a 
certificate will be issued.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-173 Filed 1-3-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P