[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44304-44307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-21334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[Docket ID-01-003; FRL-7042-5]


Finding of Attainment for PM-10; Shoshone County (City of 
Pinehurst and Pinehurst Expansion Area)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has determined that two areas in Shoshone County, Idaho, 
have attained the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for 
particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than, or equal 
to a nominal ten micrometers (PM-10) by the respective attainment dates 
for the areas. One area is the City of Pinehurst, which has an 
attainment date of December 31, 1994. The other area is an area 
immediately adjacent to the City of Pinehurst, known as the ``Pinehurst 
expansion area,'' which has an attainment date of December 31, 2000.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective October 22, 2001, 
unless EPA receives adverse comment by September 24, 2001. If adverse 
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the 
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the 
rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to Steven K. Body, Office 
of Air Quality, Mailcode OAQ-107, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 
Seattle, Washington, 98101. Copies of documents relevant to this action 
are available for public review during normal business hours (8 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m.) at this same address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven K. Body, Office of Air Quality, 
EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle Washington, 98101 (206) 553-
0782.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this notice, the words ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' means the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 
words ``Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area'' means the City of 
Pinehurst in Shoshone County, Idaho, that is designated nonattainment 
for PM-10 in 40 CFR 81.313. The words ``Pinehurst expansion area'' or 
``Pinehurst expansion PM-10 nonattainment area'' mean that portion of 
Shoshone County, Idaho, immediately adjacent to the City of Pinehurst, 
that is designated nonattainment for PM-10 in 40 CFR 81.313.

Table of Comments

I. Background
    A. Designation and Classification of PM-10 Nonattainment Areas
    B. How Does EPA Make Attainment Determinations?
    C. What PM-10 Planning has Occurred for the Pinehurst PM-10 
Nonattainment Area and the Pinehurst Expansion PM-10 Nonattainment 
Area?
    D. What Does the Monitoring Data Show?
    1. Hi-Vol SSI Sampler
    2. TEOM Sampler
II. EPA's Action
    A. Pinehurst PM-10 Nonattainment Area
    B. Pinehurst Expansion PM-10 Nonattainment Area
    C. Effect of EPA's Findings
III. Administrative Requirements

I. Background

A. Designation and Classification of PM-10 Nonattainment Areas

    Areas meeting the requirements of section 107(d)(4)(B) of the Clean 
Air Act (CAA) were designated nonattainment for PM-10 by operation of 
law and classified ``moderate'' upon enactment of the 1990 Clean Air 
Act Amendments. See generally 42 U.S.C. 7407(d)(4)(B). These areas 
included all former Group I PM-10 planning areas identified in 52 FR 
29383 (August 7, 1987), as further clarified in 55 FR 45799 (October 
31, 1990), and any other areas violating the NAAQS for PM-10 prior to 
January 1, 1989. A Federal Register document announcing the areas 
designated

[[Page 44305]]

nonattainment for PM-10 upon enactment of the 1990 Amendments, known as 
``initial'' PM-10 nonattainment areas, was published on March 15, 1991 
(56 FR 11101) and a subsequent Federal Register document correcting the 
description of some of these areas was published on August 8, 1991 (56 
FR 37654). See also 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991). The Pinehurst PM-10 
nonattainment area was one of these initial PM-10 nonattainment areas. 
All initial PM-10 nonattainment areas, such as the Pinehurst PM-10 
nonattainment area, had the same applicable attainment date of December 
31, 1994 and were classified as moderate nonattainment areas by 
operation of law. See CAA sections 188(a) and (c).
    In 1991, Idaho requested that EPA expand the Pinehurst PM-10 
nonattainment area to include an area adjacent to the City of Pinehurst 
because Idaho believed other areas of the Silver Valley contributed to 
violations of the PM-10 NAAQS in the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment 
area. EPA declined to expand the boundaries of the original 
nonattainment area because there was no evidence that the original 
description of the nonattainment problem was in error. Instead, EPA 
considered the information submitted by Idaho as an unsolicited request 
by the State to create a new nonattainment area under section 
107(d)(3)(D) of the Act. Accordingly, after notice and an opportunity 
for public comment, EPA designated the area identified by the State, 
which lies in Shoshone County, Idaho, and adjacent to the City of 
Pinehurst as nonattainment for PM-10, effective January 20, 1994. See 
58 FR 67334, 67339 (December 21, 1993). As discussed above, this area 
is generally known as the ``Pinehurst expansion area.'' EPA published a 
correction to the boundary description for the Pinehurst area on May 
11, 1995. See 60 FR 25146.
    As a newly designated PM-10 nonattainment area, the Pinehurst 
expansion area was classified as a moderate nonattainment area by 
operation of law. See CAA section 188(a). Pursuant to section 188(c)(1) 
of the Act, the attainment date for the Pinehurst expansion area was to 
be no later than the end of the sixth calendar year after the area was 
designated nonattainment. Because the Pinehurst expansion area was 
designated nonattainment for PM-10 effective January 20, 1994, the 
attainment date for the Pinehurst expansion area is December 31, 2000.

B. How Does EPA Make Attainment Determinations?

    All PM-10 nonattainment areas are initially classified ``moderate'' 
by operation of law when they are designated nonattainment. See section 
188(a). Pursuant to sections 179(c) and 188(b)(2) of the Act, we have 
the responsibility of determining within six months of the applicable 
attainment date whether, based on air quality data, PM-10 nonattainment 
areas attained the PM-10 NAAQS by the attainment date. Determinations 
under section 179(c)(1) of the Act are to be based upon the area's 
``air quality as of the attainment date.'' Section 188(b)(2) is 
consistent with this requirement.
    Generally, we determine whether an area's air quality is meeting 
the PM-10 NAAQS for purposes of section 179(c)(1) and 188(b)(2) based 
upon data gathered at established state and local air monitoring 
stations (SLAMS) and national air monitoring stations (NAMS) in the 
nonattainment area and entered into the EPA Aerometric Information 
Retrieval System (AIRS). Data entered into the AIRS has been determined 
to meet federal monitoring requirements (see 40 CFR 50.6; 40 CFR part 
50, appendix J; 40 CFR part 53; 40 CFR part 58, appendix A & B) and may 
be used to determine the attainment status of an area. We will also 
consider air quality data from other air monitoring stations in the 
nonattainment area provided that the stations meet the federal 
monitoring requirements for SLAMS. All data are reviewed to determine 
the area's air quality status in accordance with our guidance at 40 CFR 
part 50, appendix K.
    Attainment of the annual PM-10 standard is achieved when the annual 
arithmetic mean PM-10 concentration over a three-year period \1\ is 
equal to or less than 50 micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3). 
Attainment of the 24-hour standard is determined by calculating the 
expected number of days in a year with PM-10 concentrations greater 
than 150 g/m3. The 24-hour standard is attained when the 
expected number of days with levels above 150 g/m3 (averaged 
over a three-year period) is less than or equal to one. Three 
consecutive years of air quality data are generally required to show 
attainment of the annual and 24-hour standards for PM-10. See 40 CFR 
part 50 and appendix K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For example 1992, 1993, and 1994 for areas with a December 
31, 1994 attainment date and 1998, 1999, and 2000 for areas with a 
December 31, 2000 attainment date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. What PM-10 Planning H has Occurred for the Pinehurst PM-10 
Nonattainment Area and the Pinehurst Expansion PM-10 Nonattainment 
Area?

    The State of Idaho has addressed the PM-10 planning requirements 
for the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area and the Pinehurst expansion 
PM-10 nonattainment area as part of a single planning process. After 
the original initial Pinehurst area was designated nonattainment for 
PM-10, the State of Idaho, in cooperation with local officials, 
developed a control strategy that consisted of a residential wood 
combustion emission reduction program for the City of Pinehurst and the 
adjacent area. The program included public education and outreach 
efforts on how to burn wood with reduced emissions as well as a 
voluntary wood stove curtailment program designed to reduce wood 
burning during periods of adverse meteorology. In addition, through a 
combination of federal, state, and local grant and loan programs, the 
State of Idaho worked with local residents to improve home 
weatherization and to convert a number of residences from reliance on 
wood stoves to cleaner heating devices, such as natural gas furnaces, 
pellet stoves, and phase II wood stoves. Idaho submitted a SIP revision 
for the two areas containing these control measures in April 1992. On 
August 25, 1994, EPA took final action approving the PM-10 SIP for the 
Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area. See 59 FR 43745. On May 26, 1995, 
EPA took final action approving the PM-10 SIP for the Pinehurst 
expansion area. See 60 FR 27891.

D. What Does the Monitoring Data Show?

    As discussed above, the State of Idaho has addressed the PM-10 
planning requirements for the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area and 
the Pinehurst expansion PM-10 nonattainment area as part of a single 
planning process. The areas are covered by the same ambient air quality 
monitoring network, which consists of one monitoring site, located at 
the Pinehurst elementary school in the City of Pinehurst. There is no 
monitor located in the Pinehurst expansion area. The Pinehurst 
elementary school monitoring site has been determined to represent air 
quality for both nonattainment areas and to measure maximum PM-10 
levels expected to occur in both areas. The monitoring site meets EPA 
SLAMS network design and siting requirements, set forth at 40 CFR part 
58, appendices

[[Page 44306]]

D and E, and continues to monitor for PM-10.
    The State of Idaho has operated two different types of PM-10 
samplers at the Pinehurst elementary school site. Since 1988, the State 
has operated a sampler (called the Hi-Vol SSI) that collects 
particulate matter on a filter over a 24-hour period. The filter is 
then analyzed in a laboratory to determine the mass concentration. The 
Hi-Vol SSI sampler in Pinehurst does not sample every day. Instead, the 
sampling frequency varies depending on the season.
    Since July 1, 1998, the State has also operated a continuous 
sampler (called a TEOM) that collects PM-10 and provides hourly PM-10 
concentrations which are then averaged for a 24-hour PM-10 
concentration. The TEOM provides continuous, ``real time'' data and is 
often used for residential wood smoke curtailment programs. Both 
samplers are Federal Reference or Equivalent samplers and provide data 
that can be used in determining compliance with the NAAQS for PM-10. A 
listing of samplers designated as federal reference method or 
equivalent can be found at the EPA website, ``www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/
pm.html''.
1. Hi-Vol SSI Sampler
    Between January 1, 1992 through December 31, 2000, there has been 
only one exceedance of the level of the 24-hour standard measured by 
the Hi-Vol SSI sampler: a level of 177 g/m3 on February 19, 
1998. During the time the exceedance was measured in February 1998, the 
sampler was operating every third day. Therefore, each exceedance is 
counted as three expected exceedances.
2. TEOM Sampler
    A review of the PM-10 data in AIRS from the TEOM sampler at the 
Pinehurst elementary school site shows no exceedances of the 24-hour 
standard from July 1, 1998 for the remainder of the year and no 
exceedances of the 24-hour standard during 2000. During 1999, a 24-hour 
exceedance of 290 g/m3 was recorded at the TEOM sampler on 
September 25, 1999. The Hi-Vol SSI sampler did not operate on September 
25, 1999.
    Under section 107(d)(4)(B)(ii) of the CAA and 40 CFR part 50, 
appendix K, section 2.4, specific exceedances due to uncontrollable 
natural events, such as unusually high winds, may be discounted or 
excluded entirely from decisions regarding an area's air quality status 
in appropriate circumstances. See Memorandum from EPA's Assistant 
Administrator for Air and Radiation to EPA Regional Air Directors 
entitled ``Areas Affected by Natural Events,'' dated May 30, 1996 
(EPA's Natural Events Policy). Under the policy, where a state believes 
natural events have caused a violation of the NAAQS, the state enters 
the exceedance in the AIRS data base, flags the exceedance as being 
attributable to a natural event, documents a clear causal relationship 
between the measured exceedance and the natural event, and develops a 
natural events action plan (NEAP) to address future natural events. In 
the case of high-wind events where the sources of dust are 
anthropogenic, the state should also document that Best Available 
Control Measures (BACM) were required for those sources and that 
sources were in compliance with BACM at the time-of the high-wind 
event. EPA's Natural Events Policy also contains guidance for notifying 
the public of the occurrence of natural events and the health effects 
of such events, as well as minimizing public exposure to high 
concentrations of PM-10 due to natural events.
    The State of Idaho submitted a letter to EPA dated October 29, 
1999, requesting that EPA concur in Idaho's determination that the 
September 25, 1999 exceedance was attributable to high winds under 
EPA's Natural Events Policy.\2\ EPA concurred with the State's 
determination in a letter dated September 20, 2000.\3\ Therefore, EPA 
has excluded this exceedance from consideration in making attainment 
determinations for the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area and the 
Pinehurst expansion area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Idaho only recently entered the data from the TEOM sampler, 
including the September 25, 1999 exceedance, into the AIRS data 
base. In doing so, Idaho flagged the September 25, 1999 exceedance 
as attributable to a natural event.
    \3\ Now that the Idaho has entered the September 25, 1999 
exceedance into the AIRS data base, EPA intends to attach a 
concurrence flag for the exceedance in AIRS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. EPA's Action

    As discussed above, whether an area has attained the PM-10 NAAQS is 
based exclusively upon measured air quality levels over the most recent 
and complete three calendar year period. See 40 CFR part 50 and 40 CFR 
part 50, appendix K.

A. Pinehurst PM-10 Nonattainment Area

    The attainment date for the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area is 
December 31, 1994. Therefore, EPA considers the data reported for 
calendar years 1992, 1993, and 1994 in making the attainment 
determination. A review of the PM-10 data in AIRS for the Hi-Vol SSI 
sampler at the Pinehurst elementary school site for this period shows 
the three-year arithmetic average of the annual PM-10 average for 1992, 
1993, and 1994 is 42.7 g/m3, which is below the level of the 
annual standard of 50 g/m3. The TEOM sampler was not in place 
during this time. Therefore, EPA finds that the Pinehurst PM-10 
nonattainment area attained the annual PM-10 standard as of the 
December 31, 1994 attainment date for the area.
    There were also no exceedences of the 24-hour standard in AIRS for 
the Hi-Vol SSI sampler during 1992, 1993, and 1994. As discussed above, 
the TEOM sampler was not in place during this time. EPA therefore also 
has determined that the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area attained the 
24-hour PM-10 standard as of the December 31, 1994 attainment date for 
the area.

B. Pinehurst Expansion PM-10 Nonattainment Area

    The attainment date for the Pinehurst expansion area is December 
31, 2000. Therefore, EPA considers the data reported for calendar years 
1998, 1999, and 2000 in making the attainment determination. The three-
year average of the annual average for 1998 through 2000 from the Hi-
Vol SSI is 22.7 g/m3, which is below the level of the annual 
standard of 50 g/m3.There is currently insufficient data from 
the TEOM to make an attainment determination for the annual standard 
because the sampler was not operating during the first two quarters of 
1998. Therefore, based on the available data from the Hi- Vol SSI 
sampler, EPA believes that the Pinehurst expansion area attained the 
annual PM-10 standard as of December 31, 2000.
    As discussed above, there was one exceedance of the 24-hour PM-10 
standard recorded at the Hi-Vol SSI sampler at the Pinehurst elementary 
school site in February 1998. At that time, the Hi-Vol SSI sampler was 
monitoring once every three days. Therefore, this measured exceedance 
is counted as three expected exceedances, resulting in an expected 
exceedance rate for the 1998 calendar year of 3.0. No measured values 
above the level of the 24-hour NAAQS were recorded in the remainder of 
1998, 1999, or 2000, which results in a three-year average (1998, 1999, 
2000) expected exceedance rate at the Hi-Vol SSI sampler of 1.0. 
Because the expected exceedance rate at the Hi-Vol SSI sampler does not 
exceed 1.0, the data from this sampler show that the Pinehurst 
extension PM-10 nonattainment area attained the 24-hour PM-10 standard 
by the attainment date of December 31, 2000.

[[Page 44307]]

    As discussed above, the TEOM sampler recorded an exceedance on 
September 25, 1999, which has been claimed by Idaho and determined by 
EPA to be attributable to a natural event. No other exceedances of the 
24-hour standard were recorded at the TEOM sampler from 1998 through 
2000. Therefore, the data from the TEOM sampler does not indicate a 
violation of the 24-hour PM-10 standard. Even if the September 25, 1999 
exceedance was not excluded from consideration as a natural event, 
however, there is insufficient data from the TEOM to make an 
unambiguous determination that the Pinehurst expansion area did not 
attain the standard because the TEOM did not begin operating until July 
1998. There are therefore not three full years of data from the TEOM 
for the period from 1998 though 2000.

C. Effect of Finding

    In summary, EPA finds that the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area 
was in attainment of the PM-10 standards as of its attainment date of 
December 31, 1994. EPA also finds that the Pinehurst expansion PM-10 
nonattainment area attained the PM-10 standards as of its attainment 
date of December 31, 2000. Consistent with CAA section 188, the areas 
will remain moderate PM-10 nonattainment area sand will avoid the 
additional planning requirements that apply to serious PM-10 
nonattainment areas.
    These findings of attainment should not be confused, however, with 
a redesignation to attainment under CAA section 107(d) because Idaho 
has not, for either the Pinehurst PM-10 nonattainment area or the 
Pinehurst expansion PM-10 nonattainment area, submitted a maintenance 
plan as required under section 175(A) of the CAA or met the other CAA 
requirements for redesignations to attainment. The designation status 
in 40 CFR part 81 will remain moderate nonattainment for both areas in 
Shoshone County until such time as Idaho meets the CAA requirements for 
redesignations to attainment.

III. Administrative Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the 
Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also 
not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations 
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use'' (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001). Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.), the Administrator certifies that this action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities because it merely makes a determination based on air quality 
data and does not impose any requirements. This action does not contain 
any unfunded mandates and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) because it does not impose any enforceable duties.
    This action also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175, 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it will not have substantial direct effects on the 
states, on the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, 
``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). The action merely makes 
a determination based on air quality data and does not impose any 
requirements and therefore does not alter the relationship or the 
distribution of power and responsibilities between the state and the 
Federal government established in the Clean Air Act.
    This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it is not a significant 
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
    This action does not involved technical standards. Thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. In addition, 
this action does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2). This rule will be effective October 22, 2001 unless EPA 
receives adverse written comments by September 24, 2001.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 22, 2001. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 
relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: August 3, 2001.
Charles E. Findley,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 01-21334 Filed 8-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P