[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36173-36175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-17072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[FRL-7009-6]


Approval of Section 112(l) Program of Delegation; Ohio

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving, 
through a ``direct final'' procedure, a request for delegation of the 
Federal air toxics program. The State's mechanism of delegation 
involves the straight delegation of all existing and future section 112 
standards unchanged from the Federal standards. The actual delegation 
of authority of individual standards, except standards addressed 
specifically in this action, will occur through a mechanism set forth 
in a memorandum of agreement (MOA) between the Ohio Environmental 
Protection Agency (OEPA) and EPA. This request for approval of a 
mechanism of delegation encompasses all part 70 and non-part 70 sources 
subject to a section 112 standard with the exception of the Coke Oven 
standard.

DATES: The ``direct final'' is effective on September 10, 2001, unless 
EPA receives adverse or critical written comments by August 10, 2001. 
If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 
the rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule 
will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Pamela Blakely, Chief, 
Permits and Grants Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the State's submittal and other supporting information 
used in developing the approval are available for inspection during 
normal business hours at the following location: EPA Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, AR-18J, Chicago, Illinois, 60604. Please contact 
Genevieve Damico at (312) 353-4761 to arrange a time if inspection of 
the submittal is desired.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Genevieve Damico, AR-18J, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, (312) 353-4761, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Why Are We Delegating This Program to OEPA?

    Section 112(l) of the Act enables the EPA to delegate Federal air 
toxics programs or rules to be implemented by States in State air 
toxics programs. The Federal air toxics program implements the 
requirements found in section 112 of the Act pertaining to the 
regulation of hazardous air pollutants. Approval of an air toxics 
program is granted by the EPA if the Agency finds that the State 
program: (1) Is no less stringent than the corresponding Federal 
program or rule, (2) the State has adequate authority and resources to 
implement the program for all sources, (3) the schedule for 
implementation and compliance is sufficiently expeditious, and (4) the 
program is otherwise in compliance with Federal guidance. Once approval 
is granted, the air toxics program can be implemented and enforced by 
State or local agencies, as well as EPA. Implementation by local 
agencies is dependent upon appropriate subdelegation.

II. What Is the History of This Request for Delegation?

    On March 31, 1995, Ohio submitted to EPA a request for delegation 
of authority to implement and enforce the air toxics program under 
section 112 of the Act. Additional letters supplementing this request 
were sent on June 27, 1995, August 23, 1996, June 1, 1999, and July 8, 
1999. On July 22, 1999, EPA found the State's submittal complete. OEPA 
notified us through a letter dated December 13, 2000, that it is not 
requesting delegation of the Coke Oven standard (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart L). In this document EPA is taking final action to approve the 
program of delegation for Ohio for part 70 and non-part 70 sources with 
the exception of sources subject to the Coke Oven standard (40 CFR part 
63, subpart L).

III. How Will OEPA Implement This Delegation?

    Requirements for approval, specified in section 112(l)(5), require 
that a State's program contain adequate authorities, adequate resources 
for implementation, and an expeditious compliance schedule. These 
requirements are also requirements for an adequate operating permits 
program under part 70 (40 CFR 70.4). In an August 15, 1995 rulemaking, 
EPA promulgated a final full approval under part 70 of the State of 
Ohio's Operating Permit Program. The document did not include the 
approval of a 112(l) mechanism for delegation of all section 112 
standards for sources subject to the part 70 program. Sources subject 
to the part 70 program are those sources that are operating pursuant to 
a part 70 permit issued by the State, local agency or EPA. Sources not 
subject to the part 70 program are those sources that are not required 
to obtain a part 70 permit from either the State, local agency or EPA 
(see 40 CFR 70.3).
    This Ohio program of delegation will not include delegation of 
section 112(r) authority. (The 112(r) program has been delegated to 
OEPA under a separate document.) The program will, however, include the 
delegation of the 40 CFR part 63 general provisions to the extent that 
they are not reserved to the EPA and are delegable to the State, as set 
forth at 65 FR 55810 (September 14, 2000).
    As stated above, this document constitutes EPA's approval of Ohio's 
program of straight delegation of all existing and future air toxics 
standards, except for section 112(r) standards and the Coke Oven 
standard. Straight delegation means that the State will not promulgate 
individual State rules for each section 112 standard promulgated by 
EPA, but will implement and enforce without change the section 112 
standards promulgated by EPA. The Ohio program of straight delegation 
is as follows: Upon promulgation of a section 112 standard, OEPA will 
issue or reopen the appropriate permit to include the section 112 
standard for sources which are subject according to the permit issuance 
schedule in the MOA. OEPA will be able to implement and enforce the 
terms of the permit containing the section 112 standard requirement. 
OEPA must notify EPA within 45 days of the final promulgation of the 
standard if OEPA does not intend to take delegation of the standard. 
OEPA will incorporate section 112 standards into the Title V permits, 
new source review

[[Page 36174]]

permits and federally enforceable state operating permits according to 
the schedule of implementation in the MOA for each source in Ohio 
subject to the section 112 standard. The delegation will be implemented 
on a source by source basis upon the issuance of the applicable permit 
to that source. Ohio will assume responsibility for the timely 
implementation and enforcement required by each standard, as well as 
any further activities agreed to by OEPA and EPA. Some activities 
necessary for effective implementation of a standard include receipt of 
initial notifications, recordkeeping, reporting and generally assuring 
that sources subject to a standard are aware of its existence. When 
deemed appropriate, OEPA will utilize the resources of its Small 
Business Assistance Program to assist in general program 
implementation. The details of this delegation mechanism will be set 
forth in a memorandum of agreement between EPA and OEPA, copies of 
which will be placed in the docket associated with this rulemaking.

IV. What Requirements Did OEPA Meet To Receive Today's Approval?

    On November 26, 1993, EPA promulgated regulations to provide 
guidance relating to the approval of State programs under section 
112(l) of the Act. 40 FR 62262. These rules were revised on September 
14, 2000. 40 FR 55809. That rulemaking outlined the requirements of 
approval with respect to various delegation options. The requirements 
for approval pursuant to section 112(l)(5) of the Act, for a program to 
implement and enforce Federal section 112 rules as promulgated without 
changes, are found at 40 CFR 63.91. Any request for approval must meet 
all section 112(l) approval criteria, as well as all approval criteria 
of Sec. 63.91. A more detailed analysis of the State's submittal 
pursuant to Sec. 63.91 is contained in the Technical Support Document 
included in the official file for this rulemaking.
    Under section 112(l) of the Act, approval of a State program is 
granted by the EPA if the Agency finds that: (1) It is ``no less 
stringent'' than the corresponding Federal program, (2) the State has 
adequate authority and resources to implement the program for all 
sources, (3) the schedule for implementation and compliance is 
sufficiently expeditious, and (4) the program is otherwise in 
compliance with Federal guidance.

V. How Did OEPA Meet the Approval Criteria?

    EPA is approving Ohio's mechanism of delegation because the State's 
submittal meets all requirements necessary for approval under section 
112(l). The first requirement is that the program be no less stringent 
than the Federal program. The Ohio program is no less stringent than 
the corresponding Federal program or rule because the State has 
requested straight delegation of all standards unchanged from the 
Federal standards. Second, the State has shown that it has adequate 
authority and resources to implement the program. The Ohio Statutes 
authorize OEPA to require and issue Title V permits to part 70 sources 
and new source review permits and federally enforceable state operating 
permits to non-part 70 sources of regulated pollutants to assure 
compliance with all applicable requirements of the Act. The authority 
to issue permits includes the authority to incorporate permit 
conditions that implement Federal section 112 standards. Furthermore, 
Ohio has the authority to implement each section 112 regulation, 
emission standard or requirement, perform inspections, request 
compliance information, incorporate requirements into permits, and 
bring civil and criminal enforcement actions to recover penalties and 
fines. OEPA will enforce section 112 standards applicable to part 70 
sources by including such section 112 standards in Title V operating 
permits according to the schedule in the MOA. For section 112 standards 
applicable to non-part 70 sources by including such section 112 
standards in new source review and federally enforceable state 
operating permits according to the schedule in the MOA. Regardless of 
type of permit holding the requirements of the standard, the permit 
must be effective prior to the first substantial compliance date for 
all future standards. Adequate resources will be obtained through State 
matching funds, and through any monies from the State's Title V program 
that can be used to fund acceptable Title V activities.
    Third, upon promulgation of a standard, Ohio will immediately begin 
activities necessary for timely implementation of the standard. These 
activities will involve identifying sources subject to the applicable 
requirements and notifying these sources of the applicable 
requirements. Such schedule is sufficiently expeditious for approval.
    Fourth, nothing in the Ohio program for straight delegation is 
contrary to Federal guidance.

VI. How Are Sources Subject to the Coke Oven Standard (40 CFR Part 
63, Subpart L) Going To Be Handled Since OEPA Did Not Accept 
Delegation of This Standard?

    OEPA notified us through a letter dated December 13, 2000, that it 
is not requesting delegation of the Coke Oven standard (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart L). Since OEPA is not accepting delegation of the Coke Oven 
standard, EPA will be the primary enforcement authority. The Coke Oven 
standard remains an applicable requirement for the sources subject to 
this standard. Therefore, OEPA must include the standard as an 
applicable requirement in Title V permits for subject sources and 
sources subject to this standard must continue to comply with its 
requirements.

VII. How Will Applicability Determinations Under Section 112 Be 
Made?

    In approving this delegation, the State will obtain concurrence 
from EPA on any matter involving the interpretation of section 112 of 
the Clean Air Act or 40 CFR part 63 to the extent that implementation, 
administration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered 
by EPA determinations or guidance.

VIII. What Is Today's Final Action?

    The EPA is promulgating final approval of the June 1, 1999, request 
by the State of Ohio of a mechanism for straight delegation of section 
112 standards unchanged from Federal standards because the request 
meets all requirements of 40 CFR 63.91 and section 112(l) of the Act as 
it applies to part 70 and non-part 70 sources. After the effective date 
of this document, upon signing of the MOA and the issuance of the 
appropriate permit, the implementation and enforcement of all existing 
section 112 standards applicable to the part 70 or non-part 70 sources, 
excluding the Coke Oven standard (40 CFR part 63, subpart L) and 
section 112(r), which have been incorporated into the appropriate 
permits (Title V, New Source Review, or federally enforceable state 
operating permit), are delegated to the State of Ohio. As for the 
section 112 standards which have not yet been incorporated into 
permits, the implementation authority for these standards is delegated 
to the State of Ohio after the effective date of this action, upon 
signing of the MOA, and the issuance of the appropriate permit 
containing that standard. The enforcement authority and the future 
delegation of the section 112 standards to the State will occur

[[Page 36175]]

according to the procedures outlined in the MOA.
    Effective immediately, all notifications, reports and other 
correspondence required under section 112 standards should be sent to 
the State of Ohio after the permit is issued. Affected sources should 
send this information to: Robert F. Hodanbosi, Division of Air 
Pollution Control, OEPA, 122 South Front Street, P.O. Box 1049, 
Columbus, Ohio 43266-7049
    EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because EPA 
views this action as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no 
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the State Plan should 
adverse or critical written comments be filed. This action will be 
effective without further notice unless EPA receives relevant adverse 
written comment by August 10, 2001. Should EPA receive such comments, 
it will publish a final rule informing the public that this action will 
not take effect. Any parties interested in commenting on this action 
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public 
is advised that this action will be effective on September 10, 2001.
    Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing 
or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any 
State plan. Each request for revision to a State Plan shall be 
considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and 
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and 
regulatory requirements.

IX. Administrative Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This action 
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not 
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified 
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it 
merely approves a state rule implementing a federal standard, and does 
not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and 
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is 
not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), 
because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3 
of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing 
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting 
errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a 
clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied with 
Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the 
takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney 
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and 
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings' issued under the executive order. 
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2). This rule will be effective September 10, 2001 unless EPA 
receives adverse written comments by August 10, 2001.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 10, 2001. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air Pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental 
relations.

    (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.)

    Dated: June 19, 2001.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 01-17072 Filed 7-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P