[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34137-34139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16039]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 918

[SPATS No. LA-020-FOR]


Louisiana Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public 
hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) 
is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Louisiana 
regulatory program (Louisiana program) under the Surface Mining Control 
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Louisiana proposes to add 
standards for measuring revegetation success on pastureland. Louisiana 
intends to revise the Louisiana program to be consistent with the 
corresponding Federal regulations and to improve operational 
efficiency.
    This document gives the times and locations that the Louisiana 
program and the proposed amendment to that program are available for 
your inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written 
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for 
the public hearing, if one is requested.

DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., c.d.t., July 27, 
2001. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on the amendment on 
July 23, 2001. We will accept requests to speak at the hearing until 4 
p.m., c.d.t. on July 12, 2001.

ADDRESSES: You should mail or hand deliver written comments and 
requests to speak at the hearing to Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa 
Field Office, at the address listed below.
    You may review copies of the Louisiana program, the amendment, a 
listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments 
received in response to this document at the addresses listed below 
during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding 
holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting 
OSM's Tulsa Field Office.
    Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface 
Mining, 5100 East Skelly Drive, Suite 470, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135-6547, 
Telephone: (918) 581-6430.
    Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Conservation, 
Injection and Mining Division, 625 N . 4th Street, P. O. Box 94275, 
Baton Rouge, LA 70804, Telephone: (504) 342-5540.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa 
Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581-6430. Internet: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Louisiana Program

    On October 10, 1980, the Secretary of the Interior approved the 
Louisiana program. You can find background information on the Louisiana 
program, including the Secretary's findings and the disposition of 
comments in the October 10, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 67340). You 
can find later actions concerning the Louisiana program at 30 CFR 
918.15 and 918.16.

II. Description of the Proposed Amendment

    By letter dated June 1, 2001 (Administrative Record No. LA-365.04), 
Louisiana sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA and the 
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(b). Louisiana sent the amendment 
in response to our letters dated March 24, 1999, and August 16, 2000, 
that we sent to Louisiana under 30 CFR 732.17 (Administrative Record 
Nos. LA-365 and LA365.01, respectively). Below is a summary of the 
revegetation success guidelines proposed by Louisiana. The full text of 
the program amendment is available for your inspection at the locations 
listed above under ADDRESSES.

1. Section A: Introduction

    Section A describes the purpose of the revegetation success 
guidelines for pastureland. It also summarizes the State regulation at 
Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) 43:XV.5423 that applies to ground 
cover and production success on pastureland.

2. Section B: General Revegetation Requirements

    Section B describes the determinations that the Commissioner of 
Conservation (Commissioner) must make in order for the requirements of 
LAC 43:XV.5417 to be considered satisfied. LAC 43:XV.5417 provides 
general requirements for revegetation of all approved post-mining land 
uses.

3. Section C: Success Standards and Measurement Frequency

    Section C provides success standards and measurement frequency 
information for ground cover and forage production. It also provides 
requirements for reference areas.

4. Section D: Sampling Procedures

    Section D.1. provides standards for sampling pastureland. Section 
D.2.a. describes approved methods for measuring ground cover. Section 
D.2.b. describes factors that may affect production yields. It also 
describes approved methods for evaluating production. Section D.3. 
provides criteria for choosing and using test plots. Finally, section 
D.4. describes how to determine the size of a sample for ground cover 
and productivity.

5. Section E: Data Submission and Analysis

    Section E describes when and how a permittee should submit data to 
the Commissioner for review.

6. Section F: Maps

    Section F describes what a permittee must include on the maps he or 
she submits when submitting a proposed reclamation phase III release or 
data from a previously approved plan to the Commissioner.

7. Section G: Mitigation Plans

    Section G describes when a permittee must submit a mitigation plan 
to the Commissioner. It also describes what the mitigation plan must 
include.

8. Appendices

    Appendix A describes how to choose horizontal and vertical 
coordinates in establishing the location of sampling sites on the 
reclaimed area. Appendices B, C, and D provide formats for submitting 
data on ground cover, sampling frames, and whole release area 
harvesting, respectively. Appendix E provides T-Tables for use in 
calculating sample adequacy of ground cover and productivity data. 
Appendices F and G

[[Page 34138]]

provide examples of using the sample adequacy formula for ground cover 
and hay production measurements, respectively. Appendices H, I, and J 
provide examples for performing statistical analysis on ground cover 
measurements, sampling frame data, and whole release area harvesting, 
respectively. Appendix K provides the average yields per acre of 
pasture by soil for DeSoto and Red River Parishes. It also describes 
how to calculate yield adjustments when test plots and reference plots 
fall on different soil series. Appendix L provides examples of some 
acceptable plant species for permanent ground cover. Finally, Appendix 
M provides a list of references.

III. Public Comment Procedures

    Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking comments 
on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the applicable program 
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it 
will become part of the Louisiana program.
    Written Comments: If you submit written or electronic comments on 
the proposed rule during the 30-day comment period, they should be 
specific, should be confined to issues pertinent to the notice, and 
should explain the reason for your recommendation(s). We may not be 
able to consider or include in the Administrative Record comments 
delivered to an address other than the one listed above (see 
ADDRESSES).
    Electronic Comments: Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII, 
WordPerfect, or Word file avoiding the use of special characters and 
any form of encryption. Please also include ``Attn: SPATS NO. LA-020-
FOR'' and your name and return address in your Internet message. If you 
do not receive a confirmation that we have received your Internet 
message, contact the Tulsa Field Office at (918) 581-6430.
    Availability of Comments: Our practice is to make comments, 
including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public 
review during regular business hours at OSM's Tulsa Field Office (see 
ADDRESSES). Individual respondents may request that we withhold their 
home address from the administrative record, which we will honor to the 
extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we 
would withhold from the administrative record a respondent's identity, 
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or 
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your 
comment. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make 
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals 
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations 
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
    Public Hearing: If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact 
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., 
c.d.t. on July 12, 2001. We will arrange the location and time of the 
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests 
an opportunity to speak at the public hearing, the hearing will not be 
held.
    To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we 
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing 
provide us with a written copy of his or her testimony. The public 
hearing will continue on the specified date until all persons scheduled 
to speak have been heard. If you are in the audience and have not been 
scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you will be allowed to speak 
after those who have been scheduled. We will end the hearing after all 
persons scheduled to speak and persons present in the audience who wish 
to speak have been heard.
    If you are disabled and need a special accommodation to attend a 
public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.
    Public Meeting: If only one person requests an opportunity to speak 
at a hearing, a public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be 
held. If you wish to meet with us to discuss the proposed amendment, 
you may request a meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings are open to the public 
and, if possible, we will post notices of meetings at the locations 
listed under ADDRESSES. We will also make a written summary of each 
meeting a part of the Administrative Record.

IV. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and 
Budget under Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 12630--Takings

    This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is 
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal 
regulations.

Executive Order 13132--Federalism

    This rule does not have federalism implications. SMCRA delineates 
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the 
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of 
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect 
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal 
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State 
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in 
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) 
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent 
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary under SMCRA.

Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform

    The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required 
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that, to the 
extent allowed by law, this rule meets the applicable standards of 
subsections (a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are 
not applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and 
program amendments since each program is drafted and promulgated by a 
specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 
U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), 
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments 
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of 
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing 
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 
730, 731, and 732 have been met.

National Environmental Policy Act

    Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that a 
decision on a proposed State regulatory program provision does not 
constitute a major Federal action within the meaning of section 
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 
4332(2)(C)). A determination has been made that such decisions are 
categorically excluded from the NEPA process (516 DM 8.4.A).

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not contain information collection requirements that 
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.).

[[Page 34139]]

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon 
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was 
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a 
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small 
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements 
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In 
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a 
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and 
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
    a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million.
    b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government 
agencies, or geographic regions.
    c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
    This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal 
which is the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal 
regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made 
that the Federal regulation was not considered a major rule.

Unfunded Mandates

    This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any 
given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 918

    Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

    Dated: June 11, 2001.
John W. Coleman,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 01-16039 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P