[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33694-33695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15903]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 
Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested

June 12, 2001.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public 
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the 
following information collection, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for 
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control 
number. Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information 
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's 
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of 
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of 
automated

[[Page 33695]]

collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before August 24, 
2001. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find 
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, 
you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Les Smith, Federal Communications 
Commissions, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 1-A804, Washington, DC 20554 or 
via the Internet to [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies 
of the information collections contact Les Smith at (202) 418-0217 or 
via the Internet at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control No.: 03060-0820.
    Title: Transfer of Control.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Type of Review: Revision of currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business, Individuals, and Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Number of Respondents: 4.
    Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Total Annual Burden: 4 hours.
    Cost to Respondents: $0.
    Needs and Uses: This information will be used to determine that the 
transaction is complete, accurate, and complies with the Commission's 
rules. The information will also be used to update the Commission's 
records concerning ownership and to correct names and addresses of 
licensees.

    OMB Approval No.: 3060-0660.
    Title: Section 21.937 Negotiated Interference Protection.
    Form No.: N/A
    Type of Review: Extension of currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 75.
    Estimated Hours Per Response: 30 hours (6 hours respondent, 8 hours 
contract attorney, 16 hours consulting engineer).
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Cost to Respondents: $300,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 450 hours.
    Needs and Uses: Under Section 21.937, the level of acceptable 
electromagnetic interference that occurs at or within the boundaries of 
an adjacent Basic Trading Area (BTA), partitioned service area or an 
incumbent MDS station's protected service area, can be negotiated and 
established with the written consent of the affected licensee. Thus, 
Section 21.937 permits negotiated interference agreements among these 
parties. These written agreements must be submitted to the Commission 
within thirty days of ratification. (These agreements are often 
included with the submission of the FCC 304 attached as Exhibits.) 
These agreements allow the parties to establish acceptable levels of 
interference based on the design of their stations and service needs. 
These agreements are the most effective means of regulating 
interference and they provide flexibility in designing MDS systems.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15903 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P