[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20410-20411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-9909]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[AAG/A Order No. 228-2001]


Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Joint Automated Booking 
System (JABS) Program Office proposes to establish its new Privacy Act 
regulations. The DOJ proposes to exempt a new Privacy Act system of 
records entitled, ``Nationwide Joint Automated Booking System (JABS), 
DOJ-005'' from subsections (c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1), (2) and (3), 
(4)(G) and (H), (e)(5) and (8), (f) and (g) of the Privacy Act (5 
U.S.C. 552a), pursuant to 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2). Information in this 
system of records relates to matters of law enforcement, and the 
exemptions are necessary to avoid interference with law enforcement 
responsibilities and to protect the privacy of third parties. The 
reasons for the exemptions are set forth in the text below.

DATES: Submit any comments by May 23, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments to Mary Cahill, Management Analyst, 
Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 
20530 (Room 1400, National Place Building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Cahill, (202) 307-1823.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the notice section of today's Federal 
Register, the Department of Justice provides a description of this 
system of records.
    This order relates to individuals rather than small business 
entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby stated that the order 
will not have ``a significant economic impact on a substantial number 
of small entities.''

List of Subjects in Part 16

    Administrative Practices and Procedure, Courts, Freedom of 
Information Act, Government in the Sunshine Act, and the Privacy Act.

    Dated: April 9, 2001.
Janis A. Sposato,
Acting Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 
U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78, 
it is proposed to amend 28 CFR part 16, as follows.

PART 16--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority for part 16 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), 553; 18 U.S.C. 
4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717, 901.

    2. It is proposed to add Sec. 16.131 to read as follows:


Sec. 16.131  Exemption of Department of Justice (DOJ)/Nationwide Joint 
Automated Booking System (JABS), DOJ-005.

    (a) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c) 
(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1), (2), (3), (4) (G) and (H), (e)(5) and (8), 
(f) and (g): Nationwide Joint Automated Booking System, Justice/DOJ-
005. These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in the 
system is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and 
(k)(2). Where compliance would not interfere with or adversely affect 
the law enforcement process, the DOJ may waive the exemptions, either 
partially or totally.
    (b) Exemption from the particular subsections are justified for the 
following reasons:
    (1) From subsections (c)(3), (c)(4), and (d) to the extent that 
access to records in this system of records may impede or interfere 
with law enforcement efforts, result in the disclosure of information 
that would constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy 
of collateral record subjects or other third parties, and/or jeopardize 
the health and/or safety of third parties.
    (2) From subsection (e)(1) to the extent that it is necessary to 
retain all information in order not to impede, compromise, or interfere 
with law enforcement efforts, e.g., where the significance of the 
information may not be readily determined and/or where such information 
may provide leads or assistance to federal and other law enforcement 
agencies in discharging their law enforcement responsibilities.
    (3) From subsection (e)(2) because, in some instances, the 
application of this provision would present a serious impediment to law 
enforcement since it may be necessary to obtain and verify information 
from a variety of sources other than the record subject to ensure 
safekeeping, security, and effective law enforcement. For example, it 
may be necessary that medical and psychiatric personnel provide 
information regarding the subject's behavior, physical health, or 
mental stability, etc. to ensure proper care while in custody, or it 
may be necessary to obtain information from a case agent or the court 
to ensure proper disposition of the subject individual.
    (4) From subsection (e)(3) because the requirement that agencies 
inform each individual whom it asks to supply information of such 
information as is required by subsection (e)(3) may, in some cases, 
impede the information gathering process or otherwise interfere with or 
compromise law enforcement efforts, e.g., the subject may deliberately

[[Page 20411]]

withhold information, or give erroneous information.
    (5) From subsection (4) (G) and (H) because the application of 
these provisions would present a serious impediment to law enforcement 
efforts.
    (6) From subsection (e)(5) because in the collection of information 
for law enforcement purposes it is impossible to determine in advance 
what information is accurate, relevant, timely and complete. With the 
passage of time, seemingly irrelevant or untimely information may 
acquire new significance and the accuracy of such information can only 
be determined in a court of law. The restrictions imposed by subsection 
(e)(5) would restrict the ability to collect information for law 
enforcement purposes, may prevent the eventual development of the 
necessary criminal intelligence, or otherwise impede law enforcement or 
delay trained law enforcement personnel from timely exercising their 
judgment in managing the arrestee.
    (7) From subsection (e)(8) to the extent that such notice may 
impede, interfere with, or otherwise compromise law enforcement and 
security efforts.
    (8) From subsection 5 U.S.C. 552a(f) to the extent that compliance 
with the requirement for procedures providing individual access to 
records could impede, compromise, or interfere with law enforcement 
efforts.
    (9) From subsection (g) to the extent that this system is exempt 
from the access and amendment provisions of subsection (d).

[FR Doc. 01-9909 Filed 4-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FB-M