[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17147-17149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-7762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Action Affecting Export Privileges; Thane-Coat, Inc., Jerry 
Vernon Ford, and Preston John Engebretson; Decision and Order on 
Renewal of Temporary Denial Order

    On September 21, 2000, then Assistant Secretary for Export 
Enforcement F. Amanda DeBusk issued a Decision and Order on Renewal of 
Temporary Denial Order (hereinafter ``Order'' or ``TDO''), renewing for 
180 days, in a ``non-standard'' format, a May 5, 1997 Order naming, 
inter alia, Thane-Coat, Inc.; Jerry Vernon Ford, president, Thane-Coat, 
Inc.; and Preston John Engebretson, vice-president, Thane-Coat, Inc. 
(hereinafter referred to collectively as the ``Respondents''), as 
persons temporarily denied all U.S. export privileges. 65 FR 58507-
58508 (September 29, 2000). Unless renewed, the Order will expire on 
March 21, 2001.
    On February 23, 2001, pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export 
Administration Regulations (currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730-774 
(2000)) (hereinafter the ``Regulations''), issued pursuant to the 
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C.A. app 2401-
2420 (1991 & Supp. 2000)) (hereinafter the ``Act''), the Office of 
Export Enforcement, Bureau of Export Administration, United States 
Department of Commerce (hereinafter ``BXA''), requested that I renew 
the Order against Thane-Coat, Inc., Jerry Vernon Ford, and Preston John 
Engebretson for 180 days in a non-standard format, consistent with the 
terms agreed to by and between the parties in April 1998.
    In its request, BXA stated that, as a result of an ongoing 
investigation, it had reason to believe that, during the period from 
approximately June 1994 through approximately July 1996, Thane-Coat, 
Inc., through Ford and Engebretson, and using its affiliated companies, 
TIC Ltd. and Export Materials, Inc., made approximately 100 shipments 
of U.S.-origin pipe coating materials, machines, and parts to the Dong 
Ah Consortium in Benghazi, Libya. These items were for use in coating 
the internal surface of prestressed concrete cylinder pipe for the 
Government of Libya's Great Man-Made River Project.\1\ Moreover, BXA's 
investigation gave it reason to believe that the Respondents and the 
affiliated companies employed a scheme to export U.S.-origin products 
from the United States, through the United Kingdom, to Libya, a country 
subject to a comprehensive economic sanctions program, without the 
authorizations required under U.S. law, including the Regulations. The 
approximate value of the 100 shipments at issue was $35 million. In 
addition, the Respondents and the affiliated companies undertook 
several significant and affirmative actions in connection with the 
solicitation of business on another

[[Page 17148]]

phase of the Great Man-Made River Project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ BXA understands that the ultimate goal of this project is to 
bring fresh water from wells drilled in southeast and southwest 
Libya through prestressed concrete cylinder pipe to the coastal 
cities of Libya. This multibillion dollar, multiphase engineering 
endeavor is being performed by the Dong Ah Construction Company of 
Seoul, South Korea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BXA has stated that it believes that the matters under 
investigation and the information obtained to date in that 
investigation support renewal of the TDO issued against the 
Respondents. In that regard, in April 1998, BXA and Respondents reached 
an agreement, whereby BXA sought a renewal of the TDO in a ``non-
standard'' format, denying all of the Respondents' U.S. export 
privileges to the United Kingdom, the Bahamas, Libya, Cuba, Iraq, North 
Korea, Iran, and any other country or countries that may be made 
subject in the future to a general trade embargo by proper legal 
authority. In return, the Respondents agreed that, among other 
conditions, at least 14 days in advance of any export that any of the 
Respondents intends to make of any item from the United States to any 
destination world-wide, the Respondents will provide to BXA's Dallas 
Field Office (i) notice of the intended export, (ii) copies of all 
documents reasonably
related to the subject transaction, including, but not limited to, the 
commercial invoice and bill of lading, and (iii) the opportunity, 
during the 14-day notice period, to inspect physically the item at 
issue to ensure that the intended shipment is in compliance with the 
Export Administration Act, the Export Administration Regulations, or 
any order issued thereunder. BXA has sought renewal of the TDO in a 
``non-standard'' format; respondents have not opposed renewal of the 
TDO in the ``non-standard'' format.
    Based on BXA's showing, I find that it is appropriate to renew the 
order temporarily denying the export privileges of Thane-Coat, Inc., 
Jerry Vernon Ford, and Preston John Engebreston in a ``non-standard'' 
format, incorporating the terms agreed to by and between the parties in 
April 1998. I find that such renewal is necessary in the public 
interest to prevent an imminent violation of the Regulations and to 
give notice to companies in the United States and abroad to cease 
dealing with these persons in any commodity, software, or technology 
subject to the Regulations and exported or to be exported to the United 
Kingdom, the Bahamas, Libya, Cuba, Iraq, North Korea, Iran, and any 
other country or countries that may be made subject in the future to a 
general trade embargo by proper legal authority, or in any other 
activity subject to the Regulations with respect to these specific 
countries. Moreover, I find such renewal is in the public interest in 
order to reduce the substantial likelihood that Thane-Coat, Inc., Ford 
and Engebretson will engage in activities which are in violation of the 
Regulations.
    Accordingly, it is Therefore Ordered: First, that Thane-Coat, Inc., 
12725 Royal Drive, Stafford, Texas 77477, and all of its successors or 
assigns, officers, representatives, agents, and employees when acting 
on its behalf; Jerry Vernon Ford, President, Thane-Coat, Inc., 12725 
Royal Drive, Stafford, Texas 77477, and 7707 Augustine Drive, Houston, 
Texas 77036, and all of his successors, or assigns, representatives, 
agents and employees when acting on his behalf; and Preston John 
Engebretson, Vice-President, Thane-Coat, Inc., 12725 Royal Drive, 
Stafford, Texas 77477 and 8903 Bonhomme Road, Houston, Texas 77074, and 
all of his successors, or assigns, representatives, agents, and 
employees when acting on his behalf (all of the foregoing parties 
hereinafter collectively referred to as the ``denied persons''), may 
not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction 
involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter 
collectively referred to as ``item'') subject to the Export 
Administration Regulations (hereinafter the ``Regulations'') and 
exported or to be exported from the United States to the United 
Kingdom, the Bahamas, Libya, Cuba, Iraq, North Korea, or Iran, or to 
any other country or countries that may be made subject in the future 
to a general trade embargo pursuant to proper legal authority 
(hereinafter the ``Covered Countries''), or in any other activity 
subject to the Regulations with respect to the Covered Countries, 
including, but not limited to:
    A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License 
Exception, or export control document;
    B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, 
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, 
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, 
any transaction involving any item that is subject to the Regulations 
and that is exported or to be exported from the United States to any of 
the Covered Countries, or in any other activity subject to the 
Regulations; or
    C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item 
exported or to be exported from the United States to any of the Covered 
Countries that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity 
subject to the Regulations.
    Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the 
following:
    A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of any of the denied persons 
any item subject to the Regulations to any of the Covered Countries;
    B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition, or attempted 
acquisition by any of the denied persons of the ownership, possession, 
or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will 
be exported from the United States to any of the Covered Countries, 
including financing or other support activities related to a 
transaction whereby any of the denied persons acquires or attempts to 
acquire such ownership, possession or control;
    C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition 
or attempted acquisition from any of the denied persons of any item 
subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United 
States to any of the Covered Countries;
    D. Obtain from any of the denied persons in the United States any 
item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that 
the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States 
to any of the Covered Countries; or
    E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the 
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States to 
any of the Covered Countries, and which is owned, possessed or 
controlled by any of the denied persons, or service any item, of 
whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by any of the 
denied persons if such service involves the use of any item subject to 
the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United 
States to any of the Covered Countries. For purposes of this paragraph, 
servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or 
testing.
    Third, that, at least 14 days in advance of any export that any of 
the denied persons intends to make of any item from the United States 
to any destination world-wide, the denied person will provide to BXA's 
Dallas Field Office (i) notice of the intended export, (ii) copies of 
all documents reasonably related to the subject transaction, including, 
but not limited to, the commercial invoice and bill of lading, and 
(iii) the opportunity, during the 14-day notice period, to inspect 
physically the item at issue to ensure that the intended shipment is in 
compliance with the Export Administration Act, the Export 
Administration Regulations, or any order issued thereunder.
    Fourth, that, after notice and opportunity for comment, as provided 
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or 
business organization related to any of the denied persons by 
affiliation, ownership, control, or position of

[[Page 17149]]

responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services, may also be 
made subject to the provisions of this Order.
    Fifth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or 
other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items 
involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced 
direct product of U.S.-origin technology.
    Sixth, that, in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 766.24(e) of 
the Regulations, Thane-Coat, Ford, or Engebretson may, at any time, 
appeal this Order by filing a full written statement in support of the 
appeal with the Office of Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard 
ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-
4022.
    Seventh, that this Order is effective immediately and shall remain 
in effect for 180 days.
    Eighth, that, in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 766.24(d) 
of the Regulations, BXA may seek renewal of this Order by filing a 
written request not later than 20 days before the expiration date. Any 
respondent may oppose a request to renew this Order by filing a written 
submission with the Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, which 
must be received not later than seven days before the expiration date 
of the Order.
    A copy of this Order shall be served on each Respondent and shall 
be published in the Federal Register.

    Entered this 20th day of March, 2001.
Lisa A. Prager,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 01-7762 Filed 3-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M