[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16435-16439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-7403]



[[Page 16435]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 131

[FRL-6934-8]


Withdrawal of Certain Federal Human Health and Aquatic Life Water 
Quality Criteria Applicable to Vermont, the District of Columbia, 
Kansas and New Jersey

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In 1992, EPA promulgated Federal regulations establishing 
water quality criteria for toxic pollutants for fourteen States and 
jurisdictions, including Vermont, the District of Columbia, Kansas and 
New Jersey. These States have now adopted, and EPA has approved, human 
health and aquatic life water quality criteria for many of these 
pollutants. In this action, EPA is proposing to amend the Federal 
regulations to withdraw certain human health and aquatic life criteria 
applicable to these States. EPA is providing an opportunity for public 
comment on the proposed withdrawal of the Federal criteria applicable 
to these States because the States' adopted criteria are less stringent 
than the Federal criteria.

DATES: EPA will accept public comments on its proposed withdrawal of 
these criteria until May 25, 2001. Comments postmarked after this date 
may not be considered.

ADDRESSES: An original and three copies of comments should be submitted 
to W-00-23, WQCR Comment Clerk; Water Docket (MC-4101), 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460. Alternatively, comments may 
be submitted electronically in ASCII or Word Perfect 5.1, 5.2, 6.1, or 
8.0 formats to [email protected]. Hand delivered comments should be 
submitted to W-00-23, WQCR Comment Clerk, Water Docket, EB 57, 401 M 
St. SW, Washington DC 20460.
    The administrative record for consideration of Vermont's human 
health criteria is available for public inspection at EPA Region 1, 
Office of Water, 1 Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston MA 02114-1505 
during normal business hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The 
administrative record for consideration of the District of Columbia 
human health criteria is available at EPA Region 3, Water Protection 
Division, 1650 Arch St, Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 during normal 
business hours of 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. The administrative record for 
consideration of Kansas' human health and aquatic life criteria is 
available for public inspection at EPA Region 7, Water, Wetland and 
Pesticides Division, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101 
during normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The 
administrative record for consideration of New Jersey's human health 
and aquatic life criteria is available for public inspection at EPA 
Region 2, Division of Environmental Planning and Protection, 290 
Broadway, New York, New York 10007 during normal business hours of 8:00 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Gardner at EPA Headquarters, 
Office of Water (4305), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C., 
20460 (tel: 202-260-7309, fax 202-260-9830) or email 
[email protected]. Alternatively, for questions regarding Vermont, 
contact Bill Beckwith in EPA's Region 1 at 617-918-1544; for questions 
regarding the District of Columbia, contact Garrison Miller in EPA's 
Region 3 at 215-814-5745; for questions regarding Kansas, contact Ann 
Jacobs in EPA's Region 7 at 913-551-7930; and for questions regarding 
New Jersey, contact Wayne Jackson in EPA's Region 2 at 212-637-3807.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Potentially Affected Entities

    Citizens concerned with water quality in Vermont, Kansas, the 
District of Columbia and New Jersey may be interested in this proposed 
rulemaking. Entities discharging toxic pollutants to waters of the 
United States in these States could be affected by this proposed 
rulemaking since criteria are used in determining NPDES permit limits. 
Potentially affected categories and entities include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Examples of potentially
                Category                        affected entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry...............................  Industries discharging toxic
                                          pollutants to surface waters
                                          in Vermont, the District of
                                          Columbia, Kansas and New
                                          Jersey.
Municipalities.........................  Publicly-owned treatment works
                                          discharging toxic pollutants
                                          to surface waters in Vermont,
                                          the District of Columbia,
                                          Kansas and New Jersey.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be potentially affected 
by this action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now 
aware could potentially be affected by this action. Other types of 
entities not listed in the table could also be affected. To determine 
whether your facility is affected by this action, you should carefully 
examine the applicability criteria in section 131.36 of title 40 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations. If you have any questions regarding the 
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the 
appropriate person(s) listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section.

Background

    In 1992, EPA promulgated a final rule (known as the ``National 
Toxics Rule'', or ``NTR'') to establish numeric water quality criteria 
for 12 States and two Territories (hereafter ``States'') that had not 
complied fully with section 303(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Water Act 
(``CWA'') (57 FR 60848). The criteria, codified at 40 CFR 131.36, 
became the applicable water quality standards in those 14 jurisdictions 
for all purposes and programs under the CWA effective February 5, 1993.
    When a State adopts and EPA approves water quality criteria that 
meet the requirements of the CWA, EPA will issue a rule amending the 
NTR to withdraw its criteria. If the State's criteria are no less 
stringent than the promulgated Federal criteria, EPA will withdraw its 
criteria without notice and comment rulemaking because additional 
comment on the criteria is unnecessary (see 65 FR 19659). However, if a 
State adopts criteria that are less stringent than the federally 
promulgated criteria, but that in the Agency's judgment fully meet the 
requirements of the Act, EPA will withdraw the federally promulgated 
criteria after notice and opportunity for public comment. (see 57 FR 
60860)
    In today's action, EPA is proposing to amend the Federal 
regulations to withdraw certain human health and aquatic life criteria 
applicable to these States, and providing an opportunity for

[[Page 16436]]

public comment. In addition, this action proposes certain non 
substantive revisions to the regulatory language at 40 CFR 131.36 to 
make it more user-friendly and to reflect format changes in water 
quality standards that have occurred in the corresponding state 
regulations cited at 40 CFR 131.36.

Vermont

    On July 12, 1994, Vermont adopted revisions to its surface water 
quality standards (Appendix C, Vermont Water Quality Standards, 
effective August 1, 1994). EPA Region 1 approved the State's adoption 
of criteria for all toxics contained in the NTR on December 5, 1996, 
because they are consistent with the CWA and EPA's implementing 
regulations at 40 CFR Part 131.11. EPA Region 1 requested that the 
Agency withdraw the Federal criteria applicable to Vermont for which 
the State now has numeric criteria.
    In an earlier action, EPA withdrew Vermont from the NTR for certain 
human health and aquatic life criteria where the State adopted criteria 
that are no less stringent than the Federal criteria (see 65 FR 19659, 
April 12, 2000). Today's action addresses an arsenic criterion Vermont 
adopted that is less stringent than the corresponding Federal criteria 
in the NTR, but that nonetheless meets the requirements of the CWA and 
EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR 131.11. In reviewing Vermont's 
submission, EPA Region 1 concluded that the State's calculation of the 
arsenic human health criterion for the consumption of fish (organisms 
only) of 1.5 ug/L was scientifically defensible. EPA solicits comment 
on removing the Federal organism only human health criterion for 
arsenic applicable to Vermont (see column D2 of the table at 40 CFR 
131.36 for the currently applicable Federal criterion).

District of Columbia

    On March 4, 1994, the District of Columbia adopted revisions to its 
surface water quality standards [amended Chapter 11 of Title 21 DCMR 
pursuant to the authority set forth in Section 5 of the Water Pollution 
Control Act of 1984, D.C. Law 5-188, effective March 16,1985, D.C. Code 
Section 6-924(1988) and Mayor's Order 85-152, September 12,1985], 
adopting human health criteria to protect from effects related to fish 
consumption and removing the public water supply use designation. EPA 
Region 3 approved these revisions on November 4, 1996, because they are 
consistent with the CWA and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR 
Part 131.11. EPA Region 3 requested that the Agency withdraw the 
Federal human health-- water and organism criteria and human health--
organism only criteria applicable to the District (see columns D1 and 
D2, respectively, of the Table at 40 CFR 131.36) now that the District 
no longer has any waters designated as public water supply.
    In an earlier action, EPA withdrew the District of Columbia from 
the NTR for human health--organism only criteria where the District 
adopted criteria that are no less stringent than the Federal criteria 
(see 65 FR 19659, April 12, 2000). Today's action addresses the 
District's removal of the public water supply use designation and the 
human health criteria for water and organisms. The District no longer 
has any waterbodies designated for public water supply and therefore no 
longer has need for human health criteria for water and organisms. EPA 
solicits comment on removing the District from the NTR for human health 
water and organism criteria (See column D2 of the Table at 40 CFR 
131.36 for the currently applicable Federal criteria).

Kansas

    On June 28, 1994, Kansas adopted revisions to its water quality 
standards (K.A.R. 28-16-28) regarding both human health and aquatic 
life criteria, and submitted them to EPA Region 7 for review and 
approval on October 31, 1994. On February 19, 1998, EPA Region 7 
approved certain new or revised water quality criteria for the 
protection of human health and aquatic life because they are consistent 
with the CWA and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR 131.11, and 
requested that the Agency withdraw the Federal criteria applicable to 
Kansas for which the State now has numeric criteria. Also, on June 29, 
1999, Kansas adopted new and revised ambient water quality criteria for 
additional pollutants. They were submitted to EPA for review and 
approval on August 10, 1999. On January 19, 2000, EPA Region 7 approved 
these additional criteria because they are also consistent with the CWA 
and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR 131.11, and requested that 
the Agency withdraw the Federal criteria applicable to Kansas for which 
the State now has numeric criteria.
    In an earlier action, EPA withdrew Kansas from the NTR for certain 
human health and aquatic life criteria where the State adopted criteria 
that are no less stringent than the Federal criteria. (See 65 FR 19659, 
April 12, 2000) Today's action addresses arsenic and cadmium criteria 
Kansas adopted that are less stringent than the corresponding criteria 
in the NTR, but that nonetheless meet the requirements of the CWA and 
EPA's implementing regulation at 40 CFR 131.11. In reviewing Kansas's 
submission, EPA Region 7 concluded that the State's calculation of an 
arsenic human health criteria for the consumption of fish (organisms 
only) of 20.5 ug/L was scientifically defensible; that the State's 
calculation of a cadmium freshwater aquatic life criteria (Criteria 
Maximum Concentration) of 4.5 ug/l was scientifically defensible; that 
the State's calculation of a cadmium freshwater aquatic life criteria 
(Criteria Continuous Concentration) of 2.5 ug/L was scientifically 
defensible, and that these criteria meet the requirements of the CWA 
and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR 131.11. In today's action, 
EPA is soliciting comment on removing the Federal human health--
organisms only criteria for arsenic (see column D2 of the table at 40 
CFR 131.36 for the currently applicable Federal criteria) and acute and 
chronic cadmium criteria (see columns B1 and B2, respectively, of the 
table at 40 CFR 131.36 for the currently applicable Federal criteria) 
for Kansas.

New Jersey

    On August 4, 1994, New Jersey submitted to EPA Region 2 adopted 
revisions to its surface water quality standards (New Jersey 
Administrative Code 7:9B), including aquatic life and human health 
criteria. New Jersey adopted aquatic life and human health criteria for 
some of the toxic pollutants contained in the NTR and reorganized 
certain designated use classifications and requirements pertaining to 
the Deleware River and Bay. EPA Region 2 approved the State's criteria 
(with the exception of the State's PCB human health criteria) on March 
17, 2000, because New Jersey's numeric criteria for the protection of 
aquatic life and human health were consistent with the CWA and EPA's 
implementing regulations at 40 CFR 131.11. EPA Region 2 requested that 
the Agency withdraw the Federal criteria applicable to New Jersey for 
which the State now has numeric criteria.
    For many pollutants, New Jersey adopted water quality criteria as 
stringent as the Federal criteria. In a separate upcoming final action, 
EPA will withdraw without public comment those criteria that are no 
less stringent than the Federal criteria. Today's action addresses the 
criteria New Jersey adopted for aquatic life and human health that are 
less stringent than the promulgated Federal criteria, but that 
nonetheless meet the requirements of

[[Page 16437]]

the CWA and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 131.11. New 
Jersey adopted the following less stringent criteria (ug/L):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  A                                          B  Freshwater               C  Saltwater               D  Human health
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                 Water &      Organisms
                                                                      CMC  (g/L)        m>g/L)        m>g/L)        m>g/L)     (g/  (g/
                                                                                                                                   L)            L)
                                                                                B1            B2            C1            C2            D1            D2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7  Lead................................................      7439921  ............     b, c 16.0  ............  ............  ............  ............
14  Cyanide............................................        57125  ............  ............  ............  ............         a 768  ............
21  Carbon Tetrachloride...............................        56235  ............  ............  ............  ............       a 0.363        a 6.31
27  Dichlorobromomethane...............................        75274  ............  ............  ............  ............       b 0.559        b 55.7
30  1,1-Dichloroethylene...............................        75354  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 4.81
33  Ethylbenzene.......................................       100414  ............  ............  ............  ............        b 3120
39  Toluene............................................       108883  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 7440     b 201,000
42  1,1,2-Trichloroethane..............................        79005  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 13.5
49  2,4-Dinitrophenol..................................        51285  ............  ............  ............  ............  ............      b 14,300
54  Phenol.............................................       108952  ............  ............  ............  ............  ............   b 4,620,000
67  Bis2(Chloroisopropyl) Ether........................   39638-32-9  ............  ............  ............  ............  ............      b 17,400
75  1,2-Dichorobenzene.................................        95501  ............  ............  ............  ............  ............      b 17,400
76  1,3-Dichorobenzene.................................       541731  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 2620      b 22,200
77  1,4-Dichorobenzene.................................       106467  ............  ............  ............  ............           419        a 3870
80  Dimethyl-Phthalate.................................       131113  ............  ............  ............  ............  ............   b 2,990,000
81  Di-n-Butyl Phthalate...............................        84742  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 3530      a 15,700
82  2,4-Dinitrotoluene.................................       121142  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 69.2        b 5670
86  Fluoranthene.......................................       206440  ............  ............  ............  ............         a 310         a 393
87  Fluorene...........................................        86737  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 1340
89  Hexachlorobutadiene................................        87683  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 6.94
90  Hexachlorocyclopentadiene..........................        77474  ............  ............  ............  ............  ............      b 17,400
91  Hexachloroethane...................................        67721  ............  ............  ............  ............        a 2.73        a 12.4
93  Isophorone.........................................        78591  ............  ............  ............  ............         a 552        b 2590
102  Aldrin............................................       309002  ............  ............  ............  ............     a 0.00189      b 0.0226
109  4,4'-DDE..........................................        72559  ............  ............  ............  ............      b 0.0054     b 0.00585
110  4,4'-DDD..........................................        72548  ............  ............  ............  ............     b 0.00432     b 0.00436
112  alpha-Endosulfan..................................       959988  ............  ............  ............  ............         b 111         b 239
113  beta-Endosulfan...................................     33213659  ............  ............  ............  ............         b 111        b 239
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Number applies statewide. More restrictive criteria may apply in portions of the Delaware River and its tributaries.
b Number applies only in certain portions of the Delaware River.
c The freshwater criterion for this metal is expressed as a function of hardness in the water column. The value given here corresponds to a hardness of
  100 mg/l.

    In reviewing New Jersey's submission, EPA Region 2 concluded that 
the State's adopted criteria are scientifically defensible. EPA 
solicits comment on removing the Federal criteria for these pollutants 
in New Jersey (see the currently applicable Federal criteria for the 
individual pollutants in the table at 40 CFR 131.36).
    In 1994, NJ reorganized certain use classification requirements 
pertaining to the Delaware River and Bay, including a definition of the 
appropriate points of application for criteria in these waters. EPA is 
here proposing corresponding revisions to 40 CFR 131.36 (d)(3) to be 
consistent with the State regulations that the Federal regulations are 
intended to augment. In addition, on November 9, 1999, EPA amended the 
NTR criteria for PCBs-human health (columns D1 and D2 of the table at 
40 CFR 131.36) to provide for a total criteria for this pollutant, in 
lieu of criteria for individual isomers (see 64 FR 61181). EPA is here 
proposing corresponding revisions to 40 CFR 131.36 (d)(3) to be 
consistent with this change. These proposed changes do not result in 
any substantive changes to the Federal criteria applicable to New 
Jersey. These proposed revisions clarify the existing Federal 
regulations.

Administrative Requirements

    This proposed withdrawal of Federal criteria is deregulatory in 
nature and would impose no additional regulatory requirements or costs 
on anyone. Therefore, it has been determined that this proposed action 
is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive 
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject 
to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For the same reason, 
pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.), I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA has 
determined that this action contains no Federal mandates for State, 
local or tribal governments, or the private sector, nor does it contain 
in regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. Thus, today's action is not subject to the 
requirements of sections 202, 203 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-4). Further, this rule does not significantly 
or uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments, as specified 
by Executive Order 13084 (63 FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This rule will 
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). 
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    This action does not involve technical standards; thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement

[[Page 16438]]

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not 
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 131

    Environmental protection, Indians-lands, Intergovernmental 
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution 
control.

    Dated: March 20, 2001.
Christine Todd Whitman,
Administrator.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble title 40, Chapter I, part 
131 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as 
follows:

PART 131--WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

    1. The authority citation for part 131 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

    2. Section 131.36 is amended by:
    a. Revising the table in paragraph (d)(2)(ii).
    b. Revising the table in paragraph (d)(3)(ii).
    c. Revising the table in paragraph (d)(5)(ii).
    d. Revising the table in paragraph (d)(9)(ii).
    The revisions read as follows:


Sec. 131.36  Toxics criteria for those states not complying with Clean 
Water Act section 303(c)(2)(B).

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (ii) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Use classification                  Applicable criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class A, B and C Waters................  These classifications are
                                          assigned the criteria in:
                                          Column B2-#105
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (3) * * *
    (ii) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Use classification                  Applicable criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freshwater Pinelands, FW2..............  These classifications are each
                                          assigned the criteria in:
                                         Column B1--all except #102,
                                          105, 107, 108, 111, 112, 113,
                                          115, 117 and 118.
                                         Column B2--all except #105,
                                          107, 108, 111, 112, 113, 115,
                                          117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122,
                                          123, 124, and 125a.
                                         Column D1--all at a 10-\6\ risk
                                          level except #14, 21, 23, 30,
                                          37, 38, 39, 42, 68, 76, 81,
                                          86, 87, 89, 91, 93, 104, and
                                          105.
                                         Column D1--#23, 30, 37, 38, 42,
                                          68, 89, 91, 93, 104, 105 at a
                                          10-\5\ risk level.
                                         Column D2--all at a 10-\6\ risk
                                          level except #23, 30, 37, 38,
                                          42, 68, 89, 91, 93, 104, 105.
                                         Column D2--#23, 30, 37, 38, 42,
                                          68, 89, 91, 93, 104, 105 at a
                                          10-\5\ risk level.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PL (Saline Water Pinelands), SE1, SE2,   These classifications are each
 SE3, SC, Delaware Bay Zone 6.            assigned the criteria in:
                                         Column C1-- all except #102,
                                          105, 107, 108, 111, 112, 113,
                                          115, 117 and 118.
                                         Column C2--all except 105, 107,
                                          108, 111, 112, 113, 115, 117,
                                          118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123,
                                          124, and 125a.
                                         Column D2--all at a 10-\6\ risk
                                          level except #14, 21, 23, 30,
                                          37, 38, 42, 68, 76, 77, 81,
                                          86, 89, 91, 93, 104, 105.
                                         Column D2--#23, 30, 37, 38, 42,
                                          68, 89, 91, 93, 104 and 105 at
                                          10-\5\ risk level.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delaware River zones 1C, 1D, 1E, 2, 3,   Column B1--all.
 4, and 5.
                                         Column B2--all except #7.
                                         Column D1--all at a 10-\6\ risk
                                          level except #14, 23, 27, 30,
                                          33, 37, 38, 42, 68, 76, 77,
                                          81, 82, 89, 91, 93, 102, 104,
                                          105, 109, 110, 112, 113.
                                         Column D1--#23, 30, 37, 38, 42,
                                          68, 89, 91, 93, 104, 105 at a
                                          10-\5\ risk level.
                                         Column D2--all at a 10-\6\ risk
                                          level except #23, 27, 30, 37,
                                          38, 39, 42, 49, 54, 67, 68,
                                          75, 76, 77, 80, 81, 82, 86,
                                          89, 90, 91, 93, 102, 104, 105,
                                          109, 110, 112, 113.
                                         Column D2--#23, 30, 37, 38, 42,
                                          68, 89, 91, 93, 104, 105 at a
                                          10-\5\ risk level.
Delaware River Zones 3, 4, and 5.......  These classifications are each
                                          assigned the criteria in:
                                         Column C1--all.
                                         Column C2--all.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (5) * * *
    (ii) * * *

[[Page 16439]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Use classification                  Applicable criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class C................................  This classification is assigned
                                          the additional criteria in:
                                          Column B2: #10, 118, 126.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (9) * * *
    (ii) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Use classification                  Applicable criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections (2)(A), (2)(B), (2)(C), (4)...  These classifications are each
                                          assigned criteria as follows:
                                         Column B1, #2.
                                         Column D2, #12, 21, 29, 39, 46,
                                          68, 79, 81, 86, 93, 104, 114,
                                          118.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section (3)............................  This classification is assigned
                                          all criteria in: Column D1,
                                          all except #1, 9, 12, 14, 15,
                                          17, 22, 33, 36, 39, 44, 75,
                                          77, 79, 90, 112, 113, and 115.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 01-7403 Filed 3-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U