[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81495-81515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-32786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[CFDA No.: 84.133A]


Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, National 
Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; Notice Inviting 
Applications for New Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects 
for Fiscal Year 2001-2002

Note to Applicants

    This notice is a complete application package. Together with the 
statute

[[Page 81496]]

authorizing the programs and applicable regulations governing the 
programs including the Education Department General Administrative 
Regulations (EDGAR), this notice contains information, application 
forms, and instructions needed to apply for a grant under these 
competitions.
    These programs support the National Education Goal that calls for 
all Americans to possess the knowledge and skills necessary to compete 
in a global economy and exercise the rights and responsibilities of 
citizenship.
    The estimates of funding levels in this notice do not bind the 
Department of Education to make awards in any of these categories, or 
to any specific number of awards or funding levels, unless otherwise 
specified in statute.
    Reasonable Accommodations: We will consider, and may fund, requests 
for additional funding as an addendum to an application to reflect the 
costs of reasonable accommodations necessary to allow individuals with 
disabilities to be employed on the project as personnel on project 
activities.
    Applications Available: December 26, 2000.
    Applicable Regulations: The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 
82, 85, and 86; Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and 
Centers Program--34 CFR Part 350, and the Notice of Final Priority 
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.

   Application Notice for Fiscal Year 2001.--Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects, CFDA No. 84-133A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                          Maximum
                                         Deadline for transmittal of        Estimated      award       Project
         Funding priority                       applications                number of   amount (per     period
                                                                              awards       year)*      (months)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
84.133A-11 Spinal Cord Injury      February 26, 2001.....................          4-8     $350,000           60
 collaborative Projects.
84.133A-12: Spinal Cord Injury     February 26, 2001.....................            1      350,000           60
 Data Center.
84.133A-15: Spinal Cord Injury     February 26, 2001.....................            1      150,000          60
 Dissemination Center.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: Consistent with EDGAR 34 CFR 75.104(b), we will reject any application that proposes a project funding
  level for any year that exceeds the stated maximum award amount for that year.

    Program Title: Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and 
Centers Program.
    CFDA Number: 84.133A
    Purpose of the Program: The purpose of the Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to improve the 
effectiveness of services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act of 
1973. The Assistant Secretary takes this action to focus research 
attention on an area of national need. The priorities are intended to 
improve rehabilitation services and outcomes for individuals with 
disabilities.
    Eligible Applicants: Parties eligible to apply for grants under 
this program are States, public or private agencies, including for-
profit agencies, public or private organizations, including for-profit 
organizations, institutions of higher education, and Indian tribes and 
tribal organizations.
    Estimated Average Range of Awards: $150,000-$350,000.

Selection Criteria

Collaborative Spinal Cord Injury Research Selection Criteria

    The Secretary uses the following selection criteria to evaluate 
applications for Collaborative Spinal Cord Injury Research.
    (a) Importance of the problem (10 points total). (1) The Secretary 
considers the importance of the problem.
    (2) In determining the importance of the problem, the Secretary 
considers one or more of the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the applicant clearly describes the need 
and target population (5 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed project will have beneficial 
impact on the target population (5 points).
    (b) Design of research activities (30 points total). (1) The 
Secretary considers the extent to which the design of research 
activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the objectives of 
the project.
    (2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be 
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the research activities constitute a 
coherent, sustained approach to research in the field, including a 
substantial addition to the state-of-the-art (5 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the methodology of each proposed research 
activity is meritorious, including consideration of the extent to 
which--
    (A) The proposed design includes a comprehensive and informed 
review of the current literature, demonstrating knowledge of the state-
of-the-art (5 points);
    (B) Each research hypothesis is theoretically sound and based on 
current knowledge (5 points);
    (C) Each sample population is appropriate and of sufficient size (5 
points);
    (D) The data collection and measurement techniques are appropriate 
and likely to be effective (5 points); and
    (E) The data analysis methods are appropriate (5 points).
    (c) Design of dissemination activities (10 points total). (1) The 
Secretary considers the extent to which the design of dissemination 
activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the objectives of 
the project.
    (2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be 
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the materials to be disseminated are likely 
to be effective and usable, including consideration of their quality, 
clarity, variety, and format (5 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the materials and information to be 
disseminated and the methods for dissemination are appropriate to the 
target population, including consideration of the familiarity of the 
target population with the subject matter, format of the information, 
and subject matter (5 points).
    (d) Plan of operation (10 points total). (1) The Secretary 
considers the quality of the plan of operation.
    (2) In determining the quality of the plan of operation, the 
Secretary considers the adequacy of the plan of operation to achieve 
the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, 
including clearly defined responsibilities, and timelines for 
accomplishing project tasks (10 points).

[[Page 81497]]

    (e) Collaboration (10 points total). (1) The Secretary considers 
the quality of collaboration.
    (2) In determining the quality of collaboration, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the applicant's proposed collaboration with 
one or more agencies, organizations, or institutions is likely to be 
effective in achieving the relevant proposed activities of the project 
(4 points).
    (ii) The extent to which agencies, organizations, or institutions 
demonstrate a commitment to collaborate with the applicant (3 points).
    (iii) The extent to which agencies, organizations, or institutions 
that commit to collaborate with the applicant have the capacity to 
carry out collaborative activities (3 points).
    (f) Adequacy and reasonableness of the budget (5 points total). (1) 
The Secretary considers the adequacy and the reasonableness of the 
proposed budget.
    (2) In determining the adequacy and the reasonableness of the 
proposed budget, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the 
proposed project activities (3 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the budget for the project, including any 
subcontracts, is adequately justified to support the proposed project 
activities (2 points).
    (g) Plan of evaluation (10 points total). (1) The Secretary 
considers the quality of the plan of evaluation.
    (2) In determining the quality of the plan of evaluation, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for 
periodic assessment of progress toward--
    (A) Implementing the plan of operation (3 points); and
    (B) Achieving the project's intended outcomes and expected impacts 
(2 points).
    (iii) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for 
periodic assessment of a project's progress that is based on identified 
performance measures that--
    (A) Are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and 
expected impacts on the target population (3 points); and
    (B) Are objective, and quantifiable or qualitative, as appropriate 
(2 points).
    (h) Project staff (15 points total). (1) The Secretary considers 
the quality of the project staff.
    (2) In determining the quality of the project staff, the Secretary 
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for 
employment from persons who are members of groups that have 
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability (2 points).
    (3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the key personnel and other key staff have 
appropriate training and experience in disciplines required to conduct 
all proposed activities (5 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the commitment of staff time is adequate 
to accomplish all the proposed activities of the project (3 points).
    (iii) The extent to which the key personnel are knowledgeable about 
the methodology and literature of pertinent subject areas (5 points).

Spinal Cord Injury Data Center and Spinal Cord Injury and Dissemination 
Center Selection Criteria

    The Secretary uses the following selection criteria to evaluate 
applications for a Spinal Cord Injury Data Center and a Spinal Cord 
Injury and Dissemination Center.
    (a) Responsiveness to an absolute or competitive priority (20 
points total). (1) The Secretary considers the responsiveness of the 
application to the absolute or competitive priority published in the 
Federal Register.
    (2) In determining the responsiveness of the application to the 
absolute or competitive priority, the Secretary considers the following 
factors:
    (i) The extent to which the applicant addresses all requirements of 
the absolute or competitive priority (5 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the applicant's proposed activities are 
likely to achieve the purposes of the absolute or competitive priority 
(15 points).
    (b) Quality of the project design (40 points total).
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the 
proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be 
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable 
(10 points).
    (ii) The quality of the methodology to be employed in the proposed 
project (10 points).
    (iii) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is 
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target 
population or other identified needs (5 points).
    (iv) The extent to which the proposed development efforts include 
adequate quality controls and, as appropriate, repeated testing of 
products (10 points).
    (v) The extent to which the proposed project will be coordinated 
with similar or related efforts, and with other appropriate community, 
State, and Federal resources (5 points).
    (c) Technical Assistance (10 points total). (1) The Secretary 
considers the extent to which the design of technical assistance 
activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the objectives of 
the project.
    (2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be 
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary 
considers one or more of the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the methods for providing technical 
assistance are of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration (5 
points).
    (ii) The extent to which the technical assistance is appropriate to 
the target population, including consideration of the knowledge level 
of the target population, needs of the target population, and format 
for providing information (5 points).
    (d) Plan of evaluation (10 points total). (1) The Secretary 
considers the quality of the plan of evaluation.
    (2) In determining the quality of the plan of evaluation, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for 
periodic assessment of progress toward--
    (A) Implementing the plan of operation (3 points); and
    (B) Achieving the project's intended outcomes and expected impacts 
(2 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for 
periodic assessment of a project's progress that is based on identified 
performance measures that--
    (A) Are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and 
expected impacts on the target population (3 points); and
    (B) Are objective, and quantifiable or qualitative, as appropriate 
(2 points).
    (e) Project staff (15 points total). (1) The Secretary considers 
the quality of the project staff.
    (2) In determining the quality of the project staff, the Secretary 
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for 
employment from persons who are members of groups that have 
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability (2 points).
    (3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:

[[Page 81498]]

    (i) The extent to which the key personnel and other key staff have 
appropriate training and experience in disciplines required to conduct 
all proposed activities (5 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the commitment of staff time is adequate 
to accomplish all the proposed activities of the project (3 points).
    (iii) The extent to which the key personnel are knowledgeable about 
the methodology and literature of pertinent subject areas (5 points).
    (f) Adequacy and reasonableness of the budget (5 points total). (1) 
The Secretary considers the adequacy and the reasonableness of the 
proposed budget.
    (2) In determining the adequacy and the reasonableness of the 
proposed budget, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the 
proposed project activities (2 points).
    (ii) The extent to which the budget for the project, including any 
subcontracts, is adequately justified to support the proposed project 
activities (3 points).

Additional Selection Criterion

    We will use the selection criteria in 34 CFR 350.54 to evaluate 
applications under these programs. The maximum score for all the 
criteria is 100 points; however, we will also use the following 
criterion so that up to an additional 10 points may be earned by an 
applicant for a total possible score of 110 points.
    Up to 10 points based on the extent to which an application 
includes effective strategies for employing and advancing in employment 
qualified individuals with disabilities in projects awarded under these 
absolute priorities. In determining the effectiveness of those 
strategies, we will consider the applicant's prior success, as 
described in the application, in employing and advancing in employment 
qualified individuals with disabilities. Thus, for purposes of this 
competitive preference, applicants can be awarded up to a total of 10 
points in addition to those awarded under the published selection 
criteria for these priorities. That is, an applicant meeting this 
competitive preference could earn a maximum total of 110 points.

Instructions for Application Narrative

    We will reject without consideration or evaluation any application 
that proposes a project funding level that exceeds the stated maximum 
award amount per year (See 34 CFR 75.104(b)).
    We strongly recommend the following:
    (1) a one-page abstract;
    (2) an application narrative (i.e., Part III that addresses the 
selection criteria that will be used by reviewers in evaluating 
individual proposals) of no more 75 pages for Project applications, 
double-spaced (no more than 3 lines per vertical inch) 8" x 11" pages 
(on one side only) with one inch margins (top, bottom, and sides). The 
application narrative page limit recommendation does not apply to: Part 
I--the electronically scannable form; Part II--the budget section 
(including the narrative budget justification); and Part IV--the 
assurances and certifications; and
    (3) a font no smaller than a 12-point font and an average character 
density no greater than 14 characters per inch.

Instructions for Transmittal of Applications

    (a) If an applicant wants to apply for a grant, the applicant 
must--
    (1) Mail the original and two copies of the application on or 
before the deadline date to: U.S. Department of Education, Application 
Control Center, Attention: (CFDA #84.133A [Applicant should add name of 
program], Washington, DC 20202-4725; or
    (2) Hand deliver the original and two copies of the application by 
4:30 p.m. [Washington, DC time] on or before the deadline date to: U.S. 
Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA 
#84.133A [Applicant should add name of program]), Room 3633, Regional 
Office Building #3, 7th and D Streets, SW., Washington, DC.
    (b) An applicant must show one of the following as proof of 
mailing:
    (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
    (2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the 
U.S. Postal Service.
    (3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial 
carrier.
    (4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary.
    (c) If an application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service, 
the Secretary does not accept either of the following as proof of 
mailing:
    (1) A private metered postmark.
    (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.

    Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a 
dated postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should 
check with its local post office.

    (2) An applicant wishing to know that its application has been 
received by the Department must include with the application a 
stamped self-addressed postcard containing the CFDA number and title 
of this program.
    (3) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and--if not 
provided by the Department--in Item 10 of the Application for 
Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) the CFDA number--and letter, 
if any--of the competition under which the application is being 
submitted.

Application Forms and Instructions

    The appendix to this application is divided into four parts. These 
parts are organized in the same manner that the submitted application 
should be organized. These parts are as follows:
    Part I: Application for Federal Education Assistance (ED 424 (Rev. 
11/12/99)) and instructions.
    Part II: Budget Form--Non-Construction Programs (ED Form 524) and 
instructions.
    Part III: Application Narrative.

Additional Materials

    Estimated Public Reporting Burden.
    Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B).
    Certification Regarding Lobbying, Debarment, Suspension, and Other 
Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED 80-
0013).
    Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and 
Voluntary Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED Form 80-0014) 
and instructions. (NOTE: ED Form 80-0014 is intended for the use of 
primary participants and should not be transmitted to the Department.)
    Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL (if 
applicable) and instructions.
    An applicant may submit information on a photostatic copy of the 
application and budget forms, the assurances, and the certifications. 
However, the application form, the assurances, and the certifications 
must each have an original signature. No grant may be awarded unless a 
completed application form has been received.
    For Applications Contact: The Grants and Contracts Service Team 
(GCST), Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Switzer 
Building, 3317, Washington, DC 20202, or call (202) 205-8207. 
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the TDD number at (202) 205-9860. The preferred method for 
requesting information is to FAX your request to (202) 205-8717.
    Individuals with disabilities may obtain a copy of the application 
package in an alternative format by contacting the GCST. However, the 
Department is not able to reproduce in an alternative format the 
standard forms included in the application package.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Nangle, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,

[[Page 81499]]

room 3414, Switzer Building, Washington, DC 20202-2645. Telephone: 
(202) 205-5880. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number at (202) 205-4475. Internet: 
[email protected].
    Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an 
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer 
diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding 
paragraph.

Electronic Access to This Document

    You may view this document, as well as all other Department of 
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe 
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at either of the 
following sites:

http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
http://www.ed.gov/news.html

    To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available 
free at either of the preceding sites. If you have questions about 
using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free at 
1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.

    Note: The official version of this document is the document 
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the 
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal 
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers: 84.133A, Disability 
and Rehabilitation Research Projects)

    Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(b)(4).

    Dated: December 18, 2000.
Judith E. Heumann,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.

Appendix--Application Forms and Instructions

    Applicants are advised to reproduce and complete the application 
forms in this section. Applicants are required to submit an original 
and two copies of each application as provided in this section. 
However, applicants are encouraged to submit an original and seven 
copies of each application in order to facilitate the peer review 
process and minimize copying errors.

Frequent Questions

1. Can I get an extension of the due date?

    No! On rare occasions the Department of Education may extend a 
closing date for all applicants. If that occurs, a notice of the 
revised due date is published in the Federal Register. However, 
there are no extensions or exceptions to the due date made for 
individual applicants.

2. What should be included in the application?

    The application should include a project narrative, vitae of key 
personnel, and a budget, as well as the Assurances forms included in 
this package. Vitae of staff or consultants should include the 
individual's title and role in the proposed project, and other 
information that is specifically pertinent to this proposed project. 
The budgets for both the first year and all subsequent project years 
should be included.
    If collaboration with another organization is involved in the 
proposed activity, the application should include assurances of 
participation by the other parties, including written agreements or 
assurances of cooperation. It is not useful to include general 
letters of support or endorsement in the application.
    If the applicant proposes to use unique tests or other 
measurement instruments that are not widely known in the field, it 
would be helpful to include the instrument in the application.
    Many applications contain voluminous appendices that are not 
helpful and in many cases cannot even be mailed to the reviewers. It 
is generally not helpful to include such things as brochures, 
general capability statements of collaborating organizations, maps, 
copies of publications, or descriptions of other projects completed 
by the applicant.

3. What format should be used for the application?
    NIDRR generally advises applicants that they may organize the 
application to follow the selection criteria that will be used. The 
specific review criteria vary according to the specific program, and 
are contained in this Consolidated Application Package.

4. May I submit applications to more than one nidrr program 
competition or more than one application to a program?

    Yes, you may submit applications to any program for which they 
are responsive to the program requirements. You may submit the same 
application to as many competitions as you believe appropriate. You 
may also submit more than one application in any given competition.

5. What is the allowable indirect cost rate?

    The limits on indirect costs vary according to the program and 
the type of application. An applicant for an RRTC is limited to an 
indirect rate of 15 percent. An applicant for a Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research Project should limit indirect charges to the 
organization's approved indirect cost rate. If the organization does 
not have an approved indirect cost rate, the application should 
include an estimated actual rate.

6. Can profitmaking businesses apply for grants?

    Yes. However, for-profit organizations will not be able to 
collect a fee or profit on the grant, and in some programs will be 
required to share in the costs of the project.

7. Can individuals apply for grants?

    No. Only organizations are eligible to apply for grants under 
NIDRR programs. However, individuals are the only entities eligible 
to apply for fellowships.

8. Can nidrr staff advise me whether my project is of interest to 
nidrr or likely to be funded?

    No. NIDRR staff can advise you of the requirements of the 
program in which you propose to submit your application. However, 
staff cannot advise you of whether your subject area or proposed 
approach is likely to receive approval.

9. How do I assure that my application will be referred to the most 
appropriate panel for review?

    Applicants should be sure that their applications are referred 
to the correct competition by clearly including the competition 
title and CFDA number, including alphabetical code, on the ED 424, 
and including a project title that describes the project.

10. How soon after submitting my application can I find out if it 
will be funded?

    The time from closing date to grant award date varies from 
program to program. Generally speaking, NIDRR endeavors to have 
awards made within five to six months of the closing date. 
Unsuccessful applicants generally will be notified within that time 
frame as well. For the purpose of estimating a project start date, 
the applicant should estimate approximately six months from the 
closing date, but no later than the following September 30.

11. Can I call nidrr to find out if my application is being funded?

    No. When NIDRR is able to release information on the status of 
grant applications, it will notify applicants by letter. The results 
of the peer review cannot be released except through this formal 
notification.

12. If my application is successful, can I assume I will get the 
requested budget amount in subsequent years?

    No. Funding in subsequent years is subject to availability of 
funds and project performance.

13. Will all approved applications be funded?

    No. It often happens that the peer review panels approve for 
funding more applications than NIDRR can fund within available 
resources. Applicants who are approved but not funded are encouraged 
to consider submitting similar applications in future competitions.
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P

[[Page 81500]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.014


[[Page 81501]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.015


[[Page 81502]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.016


[[Page 81503]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.017


[[Page 81504]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.018


[[Page 81505]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.019


[[Page 81506]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.020


[[Page 81507]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.021


[[Page 81508]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.022


[[Page 81509]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.023


[[Page 81510]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.024


[[Page 81511]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.025


[[Page 81512]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.026


[[Page 81513]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.027


[[Page 81514]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE00.028


[[Page 81515]]


[FR Doc. 00-32786 Filed 12-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-C