[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58450-58454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP-301059; FRL-6745-2]
RIN 2070-AB78


Methacrylic Acid-Methyl Methacrylate-Polyethylene Glycol Methyl 
Ether Methacrylate Copolymer; and Maleic Anhydride-]-Methylstyrene 
Copolymer Sodium Salt; Tolerance Exemption

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of two polymers methacrylic acid-methyl 
methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; 
and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt when 
used as an inert ingredient surfactant in or on growing crops or when 
applied to raw agricultural commodities after harvest. Huntsman 
Petrochemical Corporation submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Food Quality Protection 
Act of 1996 requesting an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum 
permissible level for residues of methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-
polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; and maleic 
anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt.

DATES:  This regulation is effective September 29, 2000. Objections and 
requests for hearings, identified by docket control number OPP-301059, 
must be received by EPA on or before November 28, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests may be submitted by 
mail, in person, or by courier. Please follow the detailed instructions 
for each method as provided in Unit XI. of the  SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, your objections and 
hearing requests must identify docket control number OPP-301059 in the 
subject line on the first page of your response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  By mail: Treva Alston, Registration 
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; 
telephone number: (703) 308-8373 and e-mail address: 
[email protected].

[[Page 58451]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be affected by this action if you are an agricultural 
producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 
affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Examples of
           Categories                    NAICS            Potentially
                                                      Affected  Entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry                          111                 Crop production
                                  112                 Animal production
                                  311                 Food manufacturing
                                  32532               Pesticide
                                                       manufacturing
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have 
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular 
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this 
Document and Other Related Documents?

    1. Electronically.You may obtain electronic copies of this 
document, and certain other related documents that might be available 
electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/. 
To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and 
Regulations,'' ``Regulations and Proposed Rules,'' and then look up the 
entry for this document under the `` Federal Register--Environmental 
Documents.'' You can also go directly to the Federal Register listings 
at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
    2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for 
this action under docket control number OPP-301059. The official record 
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, and 
other information related to this action, including any information 
claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official 
record includes the documents that are physically located in the 
docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those 
documents. The public version of the official record does not include 
any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official 
record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic 
comments submitted during an applicable comment period is available for 
inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch 
(PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
Arlington, VA, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of July 10, 2000 (65 FR 42356) (FRL-6594-
5), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, as amended by the Food 
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) (Public Law 104-170) announcing the 
filing of a pesticide petition (PP 0E 6098 and PP 0E 6099) by Huntsman 
Petrochemical Corporation, 3040 Post Oak Blvd., Houston, Tx 77056. This 
notice included a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner. 
There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
     The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.1001(c) be amended by 
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for 
residues of methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol 
methyl ether methacrylate copolymer, PP #OE 6098, CAS #100934-04-1; and 
maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt, PP#0E 
6099, CAS Reg. No. 60092-15-1.
     Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to 
mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including 
all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which 
there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include 
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires EPA to give 
special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the 
pesticide chemical residue in establishing an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable 
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from 
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue...'' and specifies 
factors EPA is to consider in establishing an exemption.

III. Inert Ingredient Definition

    Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active 
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not 
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a 
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and 
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty 
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as 
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing 
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents; 
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply non 
toxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active. 
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a 
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert 
ingredients.

IV. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings

    EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only 
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from 
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably 
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human 
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to 
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the 
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert 
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures 
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA 
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure 
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from 
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
    Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the 
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of 
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability 
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also 
considered available information concerning the variability of the 
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including 
infants and children. In the case of certain chemical substances that 
are defined as polymers, the Agency has established a set of criteria 
to identify

[[Page 58452]]

categories of polymers that should present minimal or no risk. The 
definition of a polymer is given in 40 CFR 723.250(b). The following 
exclusion criteria for identifying these low risk polymers are 
described in 40 CFR 723.250(d).
    1. The polymers, methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene 
glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; and maleic anhydride-
-methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt, are not cationic 
polymers nor are they reasonably anticipated to become cationic 
polymers in a natural aquatic environment.
    2. The polymers do contain as an integral part of their composition 
the atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
    3. The polymers do not contain as an integral part of their 
composition, except as impurities, any element other than those listed 
in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
    4. The polymers are neither designed nor can they be reasonably 
anticipated to substantially degrade, decompose, or depolymerize.
    5. The polymers are manufactured or imported from monomers and/or 
reactants that are already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance 
Inventory or manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
    6. The polymers are not water absorbing polymers with a number 
average molecular weight (MW) greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
    Additionally, the polymers, methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-
polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; and maleic 
anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt, also meet as 
required one of the following exemption criteria specified in 40 CFR 
723.250(e).
    1. The number average molecular weight (MW) of methacrylic acid-
methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate 
copolymer is 3,700, is greater than 1,000 and less than 10,000 daltons. 
The polymer contains less than 10% oligomeric material below MW 500 and 
less than 25% oligomeric material below MW 1,000, and the polymer does 
not contain any reactive functional groups.
    2. The number average molecular weight (MW) of maleic anhydride-
-methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt is 15,000, and is greater 
than or equal to 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains less than 2% 
oligomeric material below MW 500 and less than 5% oligomeric material 
below MW 1,000.
    Thus, methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol 
methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; and maleic anhydride--
methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt meet all the criteria for polymers 
to be considered low risk under 40 CFR 723.250. Based on their 
conformances to the above criteria, no mammalian toxicity is 
anticipated from dietary, inhalation, or dermal exposure to methacrylic 
acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate 
copolymer; and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer 
sodium salt.

V. Aggregate Exposures

    For the purposes of assessing potential exposure under this 
exemption, EPA considered that methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-
polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; and maleic 
anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt could be 
present in all raw and processed agricultural commodities and drinking 
water, and that non-occupational non-dietary exposure was possible. The 
number average molecular weights of methacrylic acid-methyl 
methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; 
and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt are 
3,700 and 15,000 daltons respectively. Generally, polymers of these 
sizes would be poorly absorbed through the intact gastrointestinal 
tract or through intact human skin. Additionally, since these polymers 
are not water-absorbing, it is expected that respirable fractions would 
be cleared from the lungs. Since methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-
polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; and maleic 
anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt conform to the 
criteria that identify low risk polymers, there are no concerns for 
risks associated with any potential exposure scenarios that are 
reasonably foreseeable. The Agency has determined that a tolerance is 
not necessary to protect the public health.

VI. Cumulative Effects

    Section 408 (b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering 
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance or tolerance 
exemption, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the 
cumulative effects of a particular chemical's residues and ``other 
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' The Agency has 
not made any conclusions as to whether or not methacrylic acid-methyl 
methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; 
and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt 
share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other chemicals. However, 
methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether 
methacrylate copolymer; and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene 
copolymer sodium salt conform to the criteria that identify low risk 
polymers. Due to the expected lack of toxicity based on the above 
conformance, the Agency has determined that cumulative risk assessments 
are not necessary.

VII. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population

    Based on the conformance to the criteria used to identify low risk 
polymers, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm 
to the U.S. population from aggregate exposure to residues of 
methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether 
methacrylate copolymer; and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene 
copolymer sodium salt.

VIII. Determination of Safety for Infants and Children

    FFDCA section 408 provides that EPA shall apply an additional 
tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of 
threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and 
the completeness of the data base unless EPA concludes that a different 
margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. Due to the 
expected low toxicity of methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-
polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; and maleic 
anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt, EPA has not 
used a safety factor analysis to assess the risk. For the same reasons 
the additional tenfold safety factor is unnecessary.

IX. Other Considerations

A. Endocrine Disruptors

     There is no available evidence that methacrylic acid-methyl 
methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate copolymer; 
and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer sodium salt are 
endocrine disruptors.

B. Existing Exemptions from a Tolerance

     There are no existing exemptions from tolerances for methacrylic 
acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate 
copolymer; and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer 
sodium salt.

C. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since 
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance without any numerical limitation.

[[Page 58453]]

D. International Tolerances

     The Agency is not aware of any country requiring tolerances for 
methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether 
methacrylate copolymer; and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene 
copolymer sodium salt nor have any CODEX Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) 
been established for any food crops at this time.

X. Conclusion

    Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting residues of methacrylic acid-
methyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate 
copolymer; and maleic anhydride--methylstyrene copolymer 
sodium salt from the requirement of a tolerance will be safe.

XI. Objections and Hearing Requests

    Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any 
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may 
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural 
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for 
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those 
regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to 
the FFDCA by the FQPA of 1996, EPA will continue to use those 
procedures, with appropriate adjustments, until the necessary 
modifications can be made. The new section 408(g) provides essentially 
the same process for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an 
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new 
section 408(d), as was provided in the old FFDCA sections 408 and 409. 
However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 
30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?

    You must file your objection or request a hearing on this 
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit 
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must 
identify docket control number OPP-301059 in the subject line on the 
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and 
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before November 
28, 2000.
    1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific 
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for 
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the 
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a 
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a 
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). 
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing 
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that 
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except 
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion 
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be 
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
    Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460. You may also deliver your request to the Office 
of the Hearing Clerk in Rm. M3708, Waterside Mall, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is 
open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is 
(202) 260-4865.
    2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a 
hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i) or 
request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You must 
mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office 
of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please 
identify the fee submission by labeling it ``Tolerance Petition Fees.''
    EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement ``when in the 
judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and 
not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For additional 
information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may contact James 
Tompkins by phone at (703) 305-5697, by e-mail at [email protected], 
or by mailing a request for information to Mr. Tompkins at Registration 
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection 
fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins, 
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    3. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or 
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit XI.A., you 
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion 
in the official record that is described in Unit I.B.2. Mail your 
copies, identified by docket control number OPP-301059, to: Public 
Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and 
Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. 
In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the PIRIB 
described in Unit I.B.2. You may also send an electronic copy of your 
request via e-mail to: [email protected]. Please use an ASCII file 
format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of 
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will 
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 file format or ASCII 
file format. Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may 
also submit an electronic copy of your request at many Federal 
Depository Libraries.

B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?

    A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator 
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a 
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable 
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would, 
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the 
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the 
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought 
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 
CFR 178.32).

XII. Regulatory Assessment Requirements

    This final rule establishes an exemption from the tolerance 
requirement under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition 
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 
1993). This final rule does not contain any information collections 
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any 
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor does it require any 
prior consultation as specified by Executive Order 13084, entitled 
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR 
27655, May 19, 1998); special considerations as required by Executive

[[Page 58454]]

Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice 
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, 
February 16, 1994); or require OMB review or any Agency action under 
Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 
1997). This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 
note). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the 
basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption 
in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this 
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism 
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to 
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input 
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies 
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism 
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food 
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action 
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).

XIII. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of this rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

     Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.


    Dated: September 19, 2000.

James Jones,

Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

     Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

     1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
follows:

     Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), (346a) and 371.

    2. In Sec. 180.1001 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding 
alphabetically the following two inert ingredients to read as follows:


Sec. 180.1001  Exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Inert ingredients               Limits               Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
     *        *        *        *        *        *        *
Maleic anhydride--                --------                Surfa
 methylstyrene copolymer sodium                       ctant
 salt, minimum number average
 molecular weight (in amu) is
 15,000 (CAS Reg. No. 60092-15-
 1)
     *        *        *        *        *        *        *
Methacrylic acid-methyl                    --------                Surfa
 methacrylate-polyethylene                            ctant
 glycol methyl ether
 methacrylate copolymer, minimum
 number average molecular weight
 (in amu) is 3,700 (CAS Reg. No.
 100934-04-1)
     *        *        *        *        *        *        *
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[FR Doc. 00-24944 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S