[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 170 (Thursday, August 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53146-53156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-22384]



[[Page 53145]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV





Environmental Protection Agency





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Solicitation Notice: Environmental Education Grants Program; Fiscal 
Year 2001; Notice

  Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 170 / Thursday, August 31, 2000 / 
Notices  

[[Page 53146]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6861-4]


Solicitation Notice: Environmental Education Grants Program; 
Fiscal Year 2001

Contents

Section I--Overview and Deadlines
Section II--Eligible Applicants and Activities
Section III--Funding Priorities
Section IV--Requirements for Proposals & Matching Funds
Section V--Review and Selection Process
Section VI--Grantee Responsibilities
Section VII--Resource Information & Mailing List
Appendices--Federal Forms and Instructions

Section I.--Overview and Deadlines

A. Purpose of Solicitation

    This document solicits grant proposals from education institutions, 
environmental and educational public agencies, and not-for-profit 
organizations to support environmental education projects, as defined 
in this notice. This solicitation notice contains all the information 
and forms necessary to prepare a proposal. If your project is selected 
as a finalist after the evaluation process is concluded, EPA will 
provide you with additional Federal forms needed to process your 
proposal. These grants require non-federal matching funds for at least 
25% of the total cost of the project.
    The Environmental Education Grants Program provides financial 
support for projects which design, demonstrate, or disseminate 
environmental education practices, methods, or techniques, including 
assessing environmental and ecological conditions or specific 
environmental issues or problems. This program is authorized under 
Section 6 of the National Environmental Education Act of 1990 (the Act) 
(Pub. L. 101-619).

B. Environmental Education versus Environmental Information

    Environmental Education: Increases public awareness and knowledge 
about environmental issues and provides the skills to make informed 
decisions and take responsible actions. It does not advocate a 
particular viewpoint or course of action. It teaches individuals how to 
weigh various sides of an issue through critical thinking and it 
enhances their own problem-solving skills.
    Environmental Information: Proposals that simply disseminate 
``information'' will not be funded. These would be projects that 
provide facts or opinions about environmental issues or problems, but 
may not enhance critical-thinking, problem solving or decision-making 
skills. Although information is an essential element of any educational 
effort, environmental information is not, by itself, environmental 
education.

C. Due Date and Grant Schedule

    (1) Due Date--November 15, 2000. This is the postmark due date for 
an original proposal signed by an authorized representative plus one 
copy to be mailed to EPA. Proposals mailed or sent after this date will 
not be considered for funding.
    (2) Rejection Letters--EPA Headquarters and 10 Regional Offices 
send these out at different times as determined by scheduling to 
accommodate review teams. Letters are usually sent between April and 
June.
    (3) Start Date for Projects--July 1, 2001 is the earliest start 
date that applicants should plan on and enter on their application 
forms and timelines.

D. Addresses for Mailing Proposals

    Proposals requesting over $25,000 in Federal environmental 
education grant funds must be mailed to EPA Headquarters in Washington, 
DC; proposals requesting $25,000 or less must be mailed to the EPA 
Regional Office where the project takes place. The Headquarters address 
and the list of Regional Office mailing addresses by state is included 
at the end of this notice.

E. Funding Limits Per Proposal

    EPA anticipates funding of less than $3 million for this annual 
grant cycle, subject to appropriations and the availability of funds. 
Since implementation of this grants program in 1992, there has been a 
great deal of public enthusiasm for developing environmental education 
projects. Consequently, EPA has consistently received many more 
applications for these grants than can be supported with available 
funds. The competition for grants is intense, especially at 
Headquarters which usually receives about 250 proposals and is able to 
fund less than 5% of the applicants. Regional offices generally fund 
about 15% of proposals seeking over $5,000 and more than 30% of 
proposals for $5,000 or less.
    Grants in excess of $150,000 have seldom been awarded through this 
program. Although the Act sets a maximum limit of $250,000 in 
environmental education grant funds for any one project, because of 
limited funds, EPA prefers to award smaller grants to more recipients. 
Also, Congress requires that at least 25% of available funds go to 
small grants of $5,000 or less. In summary, you will significantly 
increase your chance of being funded if you request $5,000 or less from 
a Regional Office or $100,000 or less from Headquarters.

Section II.--Eligible Applicants and Activities

F. Eligible Applicants

    Any local education agency, state education or environmental 
agency, college or university, not-for-profit organization as described 
in Section 501(C)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or noncommercial 
educational broadcasting entity may submit a proposal. ``Tribal 
education agencies'' which may also apply include a school or community 
college which is controlled by an Indian tribe, band, or nation, which 
is recognized as eligible for special programs and services provided by 
the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians and 
which is not administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. These terms 
are defined in Section 3 of the Act and 40 CFR 47.105.
    Applicant organizations must be located in the United States and 
the majority of the educational activities must take place in the 
United States, Canada and/or Mexico. A teacher's school district, an 
educator's nonprofit organization, or a faculty member's college or 
university may apply, but an individual teacher, educator, or faculty 
member may not. Tribal organizations also do not qualify unless they 
meet the criteria listed above.

G. Multiple or Repeat Proposals

    An organization may submit more than one proposal if the proposals 
are for different projects. No organization will be awarded more than 
one grant for the same project during the same fiscal year. Applicants 
who received one of these grants in the past may submit a new proposal 
to expand a previously funded project or to fund an entirely different 
one. Each new proposal will be evaluated based upon the specific 
criteria set forth in this solicitation and in relation to the other 
proposals received in this fiscal year. Due to limited resources, EPA 
does not generally sustain projects beyond the initial grant period. 
This grant program is geared toward providing seed money to initiate 
new projects or to advance existing projects that are ``new'' in some 
way, such as reaching new audiences or new locations. If you have 
received a grant from this program in the past, it is essential that 
you explain how your current proposal is ``new.''

[[Page 53147]]

H. Restrictions on Curriculum Development

    EPA strongly encourages applicants to demonstrate or disseminate 
existing environmental education materials (curricula, training 
materials, activity books, etc.) rather than designing new materials, 
because experts indicate that a significant amount of quality 
educational materials have already been developed and are under-
utilized. EPA will consider funding new materials only where the 
applicant demonstrates that there is a need, e.g., that existing 
educational materials cannot be adapted well to a particular local 
environmental concern or audience, or existing materials are not 
otherwise accessible. The applicant must specify what steps they have 
taken to determine this need, e.g., you may cite a conference where 
this need was discussed, the results of inquiries made within your 
community or with various educational institutions, or a research paper 
or other published document. Further, EPA recommends the use of a 
publication entitled Environmental Education Materials: Guidelines for 
Excellence which was developed in part with EPA funding. These 
guidelines contain recommendations for developing and selecting quality 
environmental education materials. On our website ``www.epa.gov/
enviroed/resources'' you may view these guidelines and find information 
about ordering copies.

I. Ineligible Activities

    Environmental education funds cannot be used for:
    (1) Technical training of environmental management professionals;
    (2) Environmental ``information'' projects that have no educational 
component, as described in Section I (B);
    (3) Lobbying or political activities, in accordance with OMB 
Circulars A-21, A-87 and A-122;
    (4) Non-educational research and development; or
    (5) Construction projects  EPA will not fund construction 
activities such as the acquisition of real property (e.g., buildings) 
or the construction or modification of any building. EPA may, however, 
fund activities such as creating a nature trail or building a bird 
watching station as long as these items are an integral part of the 
environmental education project, and the cost is a relatively small 
percentage of the total amount of federal funds requested.

Section III.--Funding Priorities

J. Educational Priorities

    All proposals must satisfy the definition of ``environmental 
education'' under Section I(B) and also address one of the following 
educational priorities. Headquarters will fund the proposals for larger 
grants (over $25,000 in Federal funds) that address any of the top 
three categories listed below; and regional offices will fund grants in 
any of seven categories listed below. The order of the list is random 
and does not indicate a ranking. Please read the definitions that are 
included in this section to prevent your application from being 
rejected for failure to correctly address a priority.
    Headquarters Priorities (Federal funds in excess of $25,000):
    (1) Capacity Building: Increasing capacity to develop and deliver 
coordinated environmental education programs across a state or across 
multiple states.
    (2) Education Reform: Utilizing environmental education as a 
catalyst to advance state, local, or tribal education reform goals.
    (3) Community Issues: Designing and implementing model projects to 
educate the public about environmental issues and/or health issues in 
their communities through community-based organizations or through 
print, film, broadcast, or other media.
    Regional Office Priorities ($25,000 or less in Federal funds):
    (1-3) All of the Above
    (4) Health: Educating teachers, students, parents, community 
leaders, or the public about human-health threats from environmental 
pollution, especially as it affects children, and how to minimize human 
exposure to preserve good health.
    (5) Teaching Skills: Educating teachers, faculty, or nonformal 
educators about environmental issues to improve their environmental 
education teaching skills, e.g., through workshops.
    (6) Career Development: Educating students in formal or nonformal 
settings about environmental issues to encourage environmental careers.
    (7) Environmental Justice: Educating low-income or culturally-
diverse audiences about environmental issues, thereby advancing 
environmental justice.
    Definitions: The terms used above and in Section IV are defined as 
follows:
    Capacity Building refers to developing effective leaders and 
organizations that design, implement, and link environmental education 
programs across a state or states to promote long-term sustainability 
of the programs. Effective efforts address both leadership and 
organizational needs, as well as coordination to decrease fragmentation 
of effort and duplication across programs. Coordination should involve 
all major education and environmental education providers (e.g. state 
education and natural resource agencies, tribal education agencies, 
schools and school districts, professional education associations, and 
nonprofit education and environmental education organizations). 
Examples of capacity building activities include identifying and 
assessing needs and setting priorities; identifying, evaluating and 
linking programs; developing and implementing strategic plans; 
identifying funding sources and resources; facilitating communication 
and networking; promoting sustained professional development; and 
sponsoring leadership seminars. For purposes of this definition, States 
and tribal lands are equivalent and thus capacity building can take 
place ``across'' either or both.

    Note: Proposals must identify existing capacity building 
efforts, if any, and discuss how the proposed project will support 
these efforts.

    Education Reform refers to state, local, or tribal efforts to 
improve student academic achievement. Where feasible, collaboration 
with private sector providers of technology and equipment is 
recommended. Education reform efforts often focus on changes in 
curriculum, instruction, assessment or how schools are organized. 
Curriculum and instructional changes may include inquiry and problem 
solving, real-world learning experiences, project-based learning, team 
building and group decision-making, and interdisciplinary study. 
Assessment changes may include developing content and performance 
standards and realigning curriculum and instruction to the new 
standards and new assessments. School site changes may include creating 
magnet schools or encouraging parental and community involvement.

    Note: All proposals must identify existing educational 
improvement needs and goals and discuss how the proposed project 
will address these needs and goals.

    Environmental issue is one of importance to the community, state, 
or region being targeted by the project, e.g., one community may have 
significant air pollution problems which makes teaching about human 
health effects from it and solutions to air pollution important, while 
rapid development in another community may threaten a nearby wildlife 
habitat, thus making habitat or ecosystem protection a high priority 
issue.

[[Page 53148]]

    Environmental Justice refers to the fair treatment of people of all 
races, cultures, and income with respect to the development, 
implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and 
policies. Fair treatment means that no racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic 
group should bear a disproportionate share of the negative 
environmental consequences that might result from the operation of 
industrial, municipal, and commercial enterprises and from the 
execution of federal, state, local, and tribal programs and policies.
    Partnerships refers to the forming of a collaborative working 
relationship between two or more organizations such as governmental 
agencies, not-for-profit organizations, educational institutions, and/
or the private sector. It may also refer to intra-organizational unions 
such as the science and art departments within a university 
collaborating on a project.
    Wide application refers to a project that targets a large and 
diverse audience in terms of numbers or demographics; or that can serve 
as a model program elsewhere.

Section IV.--Requirements for Proposals and Matching Funds

K. Contents of Proposal and Scoring

    The proposal must contain two standard federal forms, a work plan 
with budget, and appendices, as described below. Please follow 
instructions and do not submit additional items. EPA will make copies 
of your proposal for use by grant reviewers. Unnecessary attachments 
and forms create a paperwork burden for the reviewers.
    Federal Forms: Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) and 
Budget Information (SF-424A): The SF-424 and SF-424A are required for 
all federal grants and must be submitted as part of your proposal. 
These two forms, along with instructions and examples, are included at 
the end of this notice. Only finalists will be asked to submit 
additional federal forms needed to process their proposal.
    Work Plan and Appendices: A work plan describes your proposed 
project and your budget. Appendices establish your timeline, your 
qualifications, and your partnerships with other organizations, where 
applicable. Include all five sections described below which will be 
evaluated and scored by reviewers. The highest possible score per 
proposal is 100 points as outlined in this section and in paragraph 
(N).
    (1) Project Summary: Provide the following overview of your entire 
project in this format and on one page only:
    (a) Organization: Describe: (1) your organization, and (2) list 
your key partners for this grant, if applicable. Partnerships are 
encouraged and considered to be a major factor in the success of 
projects.
    (b) Summary Statement: Provide an overview of your project that 
explains the concept and your goals and objectives. This should be a 
very basic explanation in layman's terms to provide a reviewer with an 
understanding of the purpose and expected outcome of your educational 
project.
    (c) Educational Priority: Identify which priority listed in Section 
III you will address, such as education reform. Proposals may address 
several educational priorities, however, EPA cautions against losing 
focus on projects. Evaluation panels often select projects with a 
clearly defined purpose, rather than projects that attempt to address 
multiple priorities at the expense of a quality outcome.
    (d) Delivery Method: Explain how you will reach your audience, such 
as workshops, conferences, interactive programs, etc.
    (e) Audience: Describe the demographics of your target audience 
including the number and types you expect to reach, such as, teachers, 
students, specific grade levels, ethnic composition, members of the 
general public, etc.
    (f) Costs: List the types of activities for which the EPA portion 
of grant funds will be spent.
    The project summary will be scored on how well you provide an 
overview of your entire project using the format and topics stated 
above.
Summary--Maximum Score: 10 Points
    (2) Project Description: Describe precisely what your project will 
achieve--why, how, when, with what, and who will benefit. Explain each 
aspect of your proposal in enough detail to answer a grant reviewer's 
questions. This section is intended to provide you with the flexibility 
to be creative and does not require any specific format for describing 
your project. However, you should address the following to ensure that 
grant reviewers can fully comprehend and score your project. Address 
each criteria in any sequence that best demonstrates the strengths of 
your project.
    This subsection will be scored on how well you design and describe 
your project and how effectively your project meets the following 
criteria:
    (a) Why: Explain the purpose of your project and how it will 
address an educational priority listed in Section III, such as 
education reform or children's health; and address an environmental 
issue, such as clean air, ecosystem protection, or cross-cutting 
issues. Explain the importance to your community, state, or region. 
Specify if the project has the potential for wide application, and/or 
can serve as a model for use in other locations with a similar 
audience.
    (b) Who: Explain who will conduct the project; identify the target 
audience and demonstrate an understanding of the needs of that audience 
(including cultural diversity where appropriate); explain your 
recruitment plan to attract your target audience; and clarify if you 
have incentives such as stipends or continuing education credits.
    (c) How: Explain your strategy, objectives, activities, delivery 
methods, and outcomes to establish for reviewers that you have 
realistic goals and objectives and will use effective methods to 
achieve them. Clarify for the reviewers how you will complete all basic 
steps from beginning to end. Do not omit steps that lead up to or 
follow the actual delivery methods, e.g., if you plan to make a 
presentation about your project at a local or national conference, 
specify where.
    (d) With What: Demonstrate that the project uses or produces 
quality educational products or methods that teach critical-thinking, 
problem-solving, and decision-making skills. (Please note restrictions 
on the development of curriculum and educational materials in Section 
H.)
Description--Maximum Score: 40 Points (10 Points for Each of (a) 
Through (d))
    (3) Project Evaluation: Explain how you will ensure that you are 
meeting the goals and objectives of your project. Evaluation plans may 
be quantitative and/or qualitative and may include, for example, 
evaluation tools, observation, or outside consultation.
    The project evaluation will be scored on how well your plan will: 
(a) measure the project's effectiveness; and (b) apply evaluation data 
gathered during your project to strengthen it.
Evaluation--Maximum Score: 10 Points (5 Points Each for (a) and (b))
    (4) Budget and Timeframe: Clarify how EPA funds and non-federal 
matching funds will be used for specific items or activities, such as 
personnel/salaries, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, 
contract costs, and indirect costs. Include a table which

[[Page 53149]]

lists each major proposed activity, and the amount of EPA funds and/or 
matching funds that will be spent on each activity. Smaller grants with 
uncomplicated budgets may have a table that lists only a few 
activities. Budget periods not to exceed one-year are preferred by EPA 
for all grants and are mandatory for small grants of $5,000 or less. 
Budget periods for larger grants cannot exceed two-years.
    Please Note the following funding restrictions:
    --Indirect costs may be requested only if your organization has 
already prepared an indirect cost rate proposal and has it on file, 
subject to audit.
    --Funds for salaries and fringe benefits may be requested only for 
those personnel who are directly involved in implementing the proposed 
project and whose salaries and fringe benefits are directly related to 
specific products or outcomes of the proposed project. EPA strongly 
encourages applicants to request reasonable amounts of funding for 
salaries and fringe benefits to ensure that your proposal is 
competitive.
    --EPA will not fund the acquisition of real property (including 
buildings) or the construction or modification of any building.
    Matching Funds Requirement: Non-federal matching funds of at least 
25% of the total cost of the project are required, and EPA encourages 
additional matching funds where possible. The match may be provided by 
the applicant or a partner organization or institution, and may be 
provided in cash or by in-kind contributions and other non-cash 
support. In-kind contributions often include salaries or other 
verifiable costs and this value must be carefully documented. In the 
case of salaries, applicants may use either minimum wage or fair market 
value. If the match is provided by a partner organization, the 
applicant is still responsible for proper accountability and 
documentation. All grants are subject to Federal audit.
    Important: The matching non-federal share is a percentage of the 
entire cost of the project. For example, if the 75% federal portion is 
$10,000, then the entire project should, at a minimum, have a budget of 
$13,333, with the recipient providing a contribution of $3,333. To 
assure that your match is sufficient, simply divide the Federally 
requested amount by three. Your match must be at least one-third of the 
requested amount to be sufficient. For a $5,000 EPA grant your match 
cannot be less than $1,667.
    Other Federal Funds: You may use other Federal funds in addition to 
those provided by this program, but not for activities that EPA is 
funding. You may not use any federal funds to meet any part of the 
required 25% match described above, unless it is specifically 
authorized by statute. If you have already been awarded federal funds 
for a project for which you are seeking additional support from this 
program, you must indicate those funds in the budget section of the 
work plan. You must also identify the project officer, agency, office, 
address, phone number, and the amount of the federal funds.
    This subsection will be scored on: (a) how well the budget 
information clearly and accurately shows how funds will be used; (b) 
whether the funding request is reasonable given the activities 
proposed; and (c) whether the funding provides a good return on the 
investment.
Budget--Maximum Score: 15 points (5 Points for each of (a) Through (c))
    (5) Appendices:
    (a) Timeline--Include a ``timeline'' to link your activities to a 
clear project schedule and indicate at what point over the months of 
your budget period each action, event, product, development, etc. 
occurs.
    (b) Key Personnel--Attach a one page resume for the key personnel 
conducting the project (Maximum of three resumes please).
    (c) Letters of Commitment--If the applicant organization has 
partners, such as schools, state agencies, or other organizations, 
include one page letters of commitment from partners explaining their 
role in the proposed project. Do not include letters of endorsement or 
recommendation or have them mailed in later; they will not be 
considered in evaluating proposals.
    Please do not submit other appendices or attachments such as video 
tapes or sample curricula. EPA may request such items if your proposal 
is among the finalists under consideration for funding.
    This subsection will be scored based upon: (1) Whether the timeline 
clarifies the workplan and allows reviewers to determine that the 
project is well thought out and feasible as planned; (2) whether the 
key personnel are qualified to implement the proposed project; and (3) 
whether letters of commitment are included (if partners are used) and 
the extent to which a firm commitment is made.
Appendices--Maximum Score: 15 Points (5 Points Each (a) Through (c))
    (6) Bonus Points: Reviewers have the flexibility to provide up to 
10 bonus points for exceptional projects based on the following 
criteria. (a) A maximum of 5 bonus points for: addressing an 
educational priority or environmental issue well, strong partnerships, 
solid recruitment plan for teachers or other target audience, creative 
use of resources, innovation, or other strengths noted by the 
reviewers. (b) A maximum of 5 bonus points for a well explained and 
easily read proposal. Factors for points could include: clear and 
concise, well organized, no unnecessary jargon, or other strengths 
noted by the reviewers who evaluate and compare proposals.
Bonus Points--Maximum Score: 10 Points (5 Points Each for (a) and (b))

L. Page Limits

    The Work Plan should not exceed 5 pages. ``One page'' refers to one 
side of a single-spaced typed page. The pages must be letter sized (8 
\1/2\ x 11 inches), with margins at least one-half inch wide and with 
normal type size (10 or 12 font), rather than extremely small type. 
This page limit applies to Parts 1, 2, and 3 of the Work Plan, (i.e., 
the Summary, Project Description, and Project Evaluation). Parts 4 and 
5 (i.e. Budget and Appendices) are not included in these page limits.

M. Submission Requirements and Copies

    The applicant must submit one original and one copy of the proposal 
(a signed SF-424, an SF-424A, a work plan, a budget, and the appendices 
listed above). Do not include other attachments such as cover letters, 
tables of contents, additional federal forms or appendices other than 
those listed above. Grant reviewers often lower scores on proposals for 
failure to follow instructions. The SF-424 should be the first page of 
your proposal and must be signed by a person authorized to receive 
funds. Blue ink for signatures is preferred. Proposals must be 
reproducible; they should not be bound. They should be stapled or 
clipped once in the upper left hand corner, on white paper, and with 
page numbers. Mailing addresses for submission of proposals are listed 
at the end of this document.

Section V.--Review and Selection Process

N. Proposal Review

    Proposals submitted to EPA headquarters and regional offices will 
be evaluated using the same criteria, as defined here and in Section IV 
of this solicitation. Proposals will be reviewed in two phases--the 
screening phase and the evaluation phase. During the screening phase, 
proposals will be reviewed to determine whether they meet the basic 
requirements of this

[[Page 53150]]

document. Only those proposals which meet all of the basic requirements 
will enter the full evaluation phase of the review process. During the 
evaluation phase, proposals will be evaluated based upon the quality of 
their work plans. Reviewers conducting the screening and evaluation 
phases of the review process will include EPA officials and external 
environmental educators approved by EPA. At the conclusion of the 
evaluation phase, the reviewers will score work plans based upon the 
scoring system described in more detail in Section IV. In summary, the 
maximum score of 100 points can be reached as follows:
    (1) Project Summary--10 Points
    (2) Project Description--40 Points
    (3) Project Evaluation--10 Points
    (4) Budget--15 Points
    (5) Appendices--15 Points
    (6) Bonus Points--10 Points (Only for outstanding proposals)

O. Final Selections

    After individual projects are evaluated and scored by reviewers, as 
described under Section IV, EPA officials in the regions and at 
headquarters will select a diverse range of finalists from the highest 
ranking proposals. In making the final selections, EPA will take into 
account the following:
    (1) Effectiveness of collaborative activities and partnerships, as 
needed to successfully develop or implement the project;
    (2) Environmental and educational importance of the activity or 
product;
    (3) Effectiveness of the delivery mechanism (i.e., workshop, 
conference, etc.);
    (4) Cost effectiveness of the proposal; and
    (5) Geographic distribution of projects.

P. Notification to Applicants

    Applicants will receive a confirmation that EPA has received their 
proposal once EPA has received all proposals and entered them into a 
computerized database, usually within two months of receipt. EPA will 
contact finalists no later than early summer to request additional 
federal forms and other items as recommended by reviewers.

Section VI.--Grantees Responsibilities

Q. Responsible Officials

    The Act requires that projects be performed by the applicant or by 
a person satisfactory to the applicant and EPA. All proposals must 
identify any person other than the applicant who will assist in 
carrying out the project. These individuals are responsible for 
receiving the grant award agreement from EPA and ensuring that all 
grant conditions are satisfied. Recipients are responsible for the 
successful completion of the project.

R. Incurring Costs

    Grant recipients may begin incurring costs on the start date 
identified in the EPA grant award agreement. Activities must be 
completed and funds spent within the time frames specified in the 
document.

S. Reports and Work Products

    Specific financial and other reporting requirements will be 
identified in the EPA grant award agreement. Grant recipients receiving 
more than $100,000 from EPA will be required to submit formal semi-
annual progress reports; and grantees for less may be required to 
submit brief semi-annual reports. Grant recipients will submit two 
copies of their final report and two copies of all work products to the 
EPA project officer within 90 days after the expiration of the budget 
period. This report will be accepted as the final requirement unless 
the EPA project officer notifies you that changes must be made.

Section VII.--Resource Information and Mailing List

T. Internet: www.epa.gov/enviroed

    Resources: Please visit our website where you can view and download 
this solicitation notice, tips for developing successful grant 
applications, descriptions of projects funded under this program by 
state, and other education links and resource materials. The 
``Excellence in EE'' series of publications listed there includes 
guidelines for: developing and evaluating educational materials; the 
initial preparation of environmental educators; and using environmental 
education in grades K-12 to support state and local education reform 
goals. In addition, a tutorial for grant applicants is available at: 
www.epa.gov/seahome/grants/src/grant.htm
    Forms: If you receive this solicitation electronically and if the 
standard federal forms for Application (SF-424) and Budget (SF-424A) 
cannot be printed by your equipment, you may locate them the following 
ways (but please read our instructions which have been modified for 
this grant program): The Federal Register in which this document is 
published contains the forms and is available to be copied at many 
public libraries; many federal offices use the forms and have copies 
available; or you may call or write the appropriate EPA office listed 
at the end of this document.

U. Other Funding

    Please note that this is a very competitive grants program. Limited 
funding is available and many grant applications are expected to be 
received. Therefore, EPA cannot fund all applications. If your project 
is not funded, you may wish to review a listing of other EPA grant 
programs in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. This 
publication is available at local libraries, colleges, and 
universities.

V. Regulatory References

    The Environmental Education Grant Program Regulations, published in 
the Federal Register on March 9, 1992, provides additional information 
on EPA's administration of this program (57 FR 8390; Title 40 CFR, part 
47 or 40 CFR part 47). Also, EPA's general assistance regulations at 40 
CFR part 31 applies to state, local, and Indian tribal governments and 
40 CFR part 30 applies to all other applicants such as nonprofit 
organizations.

W. Classification of Notice

    Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report 
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the 
General Accounting Office prior to publication of this rule in today's 
Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
U.S.C. 804 (2).
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the 
information collection requirements contained in this solicitation 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq. and has assigned OMB control number 2030-0006.

X. Mailing List for Year 2002 Environmental Education Grants

    EPA develops an entirely new mailing list for the grants program 
each year. The Fiscal Year 2002 mailing list will automatically include 
all applicants who submit proposals for a FY 2001 grant and anyone who 
specifically requests the next Solicitation Notice. If you do not 
submit a proposal for the year 2001 and wish to be added to our future 
mailing list, mail your request--please do not telephone--along with 
your name, organization, address, and phone number to: Environmental 
Education Grant Program (Year 2002), EPA Office of Environmental 
Education,

[[Page 53151]]

(1704 A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

    Dated: August 25, 2000.
John Kasper,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Communications, 
Education, and Media Relations.

Mailing Addresses and Information

    Applicants who need more information about this grant program or 
clarification about specific requirements in this Solicitation Notice, 
may contact the Environmental Education Office in Washington, D.C. for 
grant requests of more than $25,000 or their EPA regional office for 
grant requests of $25,000 or less.

U.S. EPA Headquarters--For Proposals Requesting More Than $25,000 From 
EPA

    Mail proposals to: Environmental Education Grant Program, Office of 
Environmental Education (1704 A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, D.C. 20460.
    Information: Diane Berger and Sheri Jojokian, (202) 260-8619.

U.S. EPA Regional Offices--For Proposals Requesting $25,000 or Less

    Mail the proposal to the Regional Office where the project will 
take place, rather than where the applicant is located, if these 
locations are different.
EPA Region I--CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region I, Enviro Education Grants 
(MGM), 1 Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114.
    Hand-deliver to: 10th Floor Mail Room, Boston, MA (M-F 8am-4pm).
    Information: Kristen Conroy, (617) 918-1069.
EPA Region II--NJ, NY, PR, VI
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region II, Enviro Education Grants, 
Grants and Contracts Management Branch, 290 Broadway, 27th Floor, New 
York, NY 10007-1866.
    Information: Teresa Ippolito, (212) 637-3671.
EPA Region III--DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region III, Enviro Education Grants, 
Grants Management Section (3PM70), 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 
19103-2029.
    Information: Nan Ides, (215) 814-5546.
EPA Region IV--AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region IV, Enviro Education Grants, 
Office of External Affairs, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Atlanta, GA 30303.
    Information: Benjamin Blair, (404) 562-8321.
EPA Region V--IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region V, Enviro Education Grants, 
Grants Management Section (MC-10J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
IL 60604.
    Information: Megan Gavin, (312) 353-5282.
Region VI--AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region VI, Enviro Education Grants 
(6XA), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202.
    Information: Jo Taylor, (214) 665-2204.
Region VII--IA, KS, MO, NE
    Mail proposal to: U.S. EPA, Region VII, Enviro Education Grants, 
Office of External Programs, 901 N. 5th Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.
    Information: Denise Morrison, (913) 551-7402.
Region VIII--CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region VIII, Enviro Education Grants, 
999 18th Street (80C), Denver, CO 80202-2466.
    Information: Cece Forget, (303) 312-6605.
Region IX--AZ, CA, HI, NV, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Marianas
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region IX, Enviro Education Grants, 
Commun. & Gov't Relations (CGR-3), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 
CA 94105.
    Information: Stacey Benfer, (415) 744-1161.
Region X--AK, ID, OR, WA
    Mail proposals to: U.S. EPA, Region X, Enviro Education Grants, 
Public Environmental Resource Center, 1200 Sixth Avenue (EXA-124), 
Seattle, WA 98101
    Information: Sally Hanft, (800) 424-4372, (206) 553-1207.

Instructions for the SF 424-Application

    This is a standard Federal form to be used by applicants as a 
required face sheet for the Environmental Education Grants Program. 
These instructions have been modified for this program only and do not 
apply to any other Federal program.
    1. Check the box marked ``Non-Construction'' under ``Application.''
    2. Date application submitted to Federal agency (or State if 
applicable) & applicant's control number (if applicable).
    3. State use only (if applicable).
    4. If you are currently funded for a related project, enter present 
Federal identifier number. If not, leave blank.
    5. Legal name of applicant organization, name of primary 
organizational unit which will undertake the grant activity, complete 
address of the applicant organization, and name and telephone number of 
the person to contact on matters related to this application.
    6. Enter Employer Identification Number (EIN) as assigned by the 
Internal Revenue Service. You can obtain this number from your payroll 
office. It is the same Federal Identification Number which appears on 
W-2 forms. If your organization does not have a number, you may obtain 
one by calling the Taxpayer Services number for the IRS.
    7. Enter the appropriate letter in the space provided.
    8. Check the box marked ``new'' since all proposals must be for new 
projects.
    9. Enter U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
    10. Enter 66.951 Environmental Education Grants Program.
    11. Enter a brief descriptive title of the project.
    12. List only the largest areas affected by the project (e.g., 
State, counties, cities).
    13. Self-explanatory (see Section IV, K4 in Solicitation Notice).
    14. In (a) list the Congressional District where the applicant 
organization is located; and in (b) any District(s) affected by the 
program or project. If your project covers many areas, several 
congressional districts will be listed. If it covers the entire state, 
simply put in STATEWIDE. If you are not sure about the congressional 
district, call the County Voter Registration Department.
    15. Amount requested or to be contributed during the funding/budget 
period by each contributor. Line (a) is for the amount of money you are 
requesting from EPA. Lines (b-e) are for the amounts either you or 
another organization are providing for this project. Line (f) is for 
any program income which you expect will be generated by this project. 
Examples of program income are fees for services performed, income 
generated from the sale of a brochure produced with the grant funds, or 
admission fees to a conference financed by the grant funds. The total 
of lines (b-e) must be at least 25% of line (g), as this grant has a 
match requirement of 25% of the Total Allowable Project Costs. Value of 
in-kind contributions should be included on appropriate lines as 
applicable. If both basic and supplemental amounts

[[Page 53152]]

are included, show breakdown on an attached Budget sheet. For multiple 
program funding, use totals and show breakdown using same categories as 
item 15.
    16. Check (b) (NO) since your application does not have to be sent 
through the state clearinghouse for review.
    17. This question applies to the applicant organization, not the 
person who signs as the authorized representative. Categories of debt 
include delinquent audit disallowances, loans and taxes.
    18. The authorized representative is the person who is able to 
contract or obligate your agency to the terms and conditions of the 
grant. (Please sign with blue ink.) A copy of the governing body's 
authorization for you to sign this application as official 
representative must be on file in the applicant's office.

Instructions for the SF-424A--Budget

    This is a standard Federal form used by applicants as a basic 
budget. These instructions have been modified for this grant program 
only and do not apply to any other Federal Program. Do not fill in 
Section A--Budget Summary.
Complete Section B--Budget Categories--Columns (1), (2) and (5)
    For each major program, function or activity, fill in the total 
requirements for funds by object class categories. Please round figures 
to the nearest dollar.
    All applications should contain a breakdown by the relevant object 
class categories shown in Lines (a-h): columns (1), (2), and (5) of 
Section B. Include Federal funds in column (1) and non-Federal 
(matching) funds in column (2), and put the totals in column (5). Many 
applications will not have entries in all object class categories. Line 
6(i)--Show the totals of lines 6(a) through 6(h) in each column. Line 
6(j)--Show the amount of indirect costs, but ONLY if your organization 
has already prepared an ``indirect cost rate'' proposal and has it on 
file, subject to audit. Line 6(k)--Enter the total of amounts of Lines 
6(i) and 6(j). Line 7--Program Income--Enter the estimated amount of 
income, if any, expected to be generated from this project. Do not add 
or subtract this amount from the total project amount. Describe the 
nature and source of income in the detailed budget description.
    Detailed Itemization of Costs: The proposal must also contain a 
detailed budget description as specified in the Notice in Section IV, 
K4, and should conform to the following:
    Personnel: List all participants in the project by position title. 
Give the percentage of the budget period for which they will be fully 
employed on the project (e.g., half-time for half the budget period 
equals 25%, full-time for half the budget period equals 50%, etc.). 
Give the annual salary and the total cost over the budget period for 
all personnel listed.
    Travel: If travel is budgeted, show destination and purpose of 
travel as well as costs.
    Equipment: Identify all equipment to be purchased and for what 
purpose it will be used.
    Supplies: If the supply budget is less than 2% of total costs, you 
do not need to itemize.
    Contractual: Specify the nature and cost of such services. EPA may 
require review of contracts for personal services prior to their 
execution to assure that all costs are reasonable and necessary to the 
project.
    Construction: Not allowable for this program.
    Other: Specify all other costs under this category.
    Indirect Costs: Provide an explanation of how indirect charges were 
calculated for this project.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

[[Page 53153]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31AU00.006


[[Page 53154]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31AU00.007


[[Page 53155]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31AU00.008


[[Page 53156]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31AU00.009

[FR Doc. 00-22384 Filed 8-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-C