[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 165 (Thursday, August 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 51601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-21665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-212-003]


NUI Corporation (City of Gas Company of Florida Division) v. 
Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Filings

August 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on August 14, 2000, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT), and Enron North America Corp. (ENA) each tendered for 
filing in the above referenced docket to comply with the requests for 
information in the Commission's Order on Complaint, Requiring Tariff 
Filing, And Requiring Filing of Information (Order on Complaint) issued 
on July 14, 2000, in this proceeding.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 92 FERC para.61,044 (2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FGT and ENA filed information relating to ENA's need for capacity 
on the FGT system and ENA's decision to submit a bid on an expiring 
contract of NUI Corporation (City Gas Company of Florida Division) 
(NUI) during the right-of-first-refusal process.
    FGT and ENA both request privileged and confidential treatment for 
some of the filed information because they assert the information 
sought relates to both FGT's and ENA's on-going business and personnel 
matters and, therefore, is proprietary and sensitive and would cause 
FGT, or its customers, and ENA substantial competitive harm if 
disclosed. Accordingly, FGT and ENA request that the Commission treat 
their respective filings and the information contained therein as 
confidential and proprietary and not disclose such information, or 
require FGT or ENA to disclose such information to third parties 
pursuant to Sec. 388.112 of the Commission's Regulations.
    It is not clear from the filings whether FGT or ENA has served a 
redacted copy of their filings on the parties to the proceeding. As set 
forth in Sec. 385.213(c)(5)(ii) of the Commission's regulations, FGT 
and ENA must provide a redacted copy of its filing without the 
privileged information to all parties on the official service list. In 
addition, both FGT and ENA must provide each party with a proposed form 
of protective agreement.
    Under the July 14, 2000 order, parties were to have thirty days 
from the date of the filings within which to file a response to the FGT 
and ENA filings. The time period will be extended to October 13, 2000 
to permit sufficient time to execute protective agreements and review 
the filings. Copies of these filings are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (Call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-21665 Filed 8-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M