[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 157 (Monday, August 14, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49499-49501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-20535]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA-225-0230; FRL-6731-4]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; 
California--Santa Barbara

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve a state implementation 
plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of California to provide for 
attainment of the 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard 
(NAAQS) in Santa Barbara County. EPA is approving the SIP revision 
under provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA) regarding EPA action on SIP 
submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air quality 
standards, and plan requirements for nonattainment areas.

DATES: This action is effective on September 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The rulemaking docket for this action is available for 
public inspection during normal business hours at EPA's Region IX 
office. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying parts of the 
docket.
    Copies of the SIP materials are also available for inspection at 
the following locations:

California Air Resources Board, 2020 L Street, Sacramento, California
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, 26 Castilian Drive 
B-23, Goleta, CA 93117

    Santa Barbara's 1998 Clean Air Plan is available electronically at: 
http://www.sbcapcd.org/capes.htm

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Jesson (AIR-2), EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, (415) 744-1288, or 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:   

I. Background

    We are finalizing approval of Santa Barbara's 1998 Clean Air Plan 
(CAP). The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 
(SBCAPCD) adopted the plan to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements 
for ozone areas classified as serious. The California Air Resources 
Board (CARB) submitted the plan to us on March 19, 1999. EPA determined 
the submittal to be complete on April 28, 1999, pursuant to 40 CFR part 
51, appendix V.
    On March 30, 2000, we proposed approval of the ozone plan with 
respect to its emissions inventories, control measures, 1999 rate-of-
progress (ROP) plan, attainment demonstration, and transportation 
budgets. Please see that document (65 FR 16864-16869) for further 
details on our proposed action, applicable CAA requirements, and 
additional information on the affected area.

II. Public Comments

    We received no public comments.

III. EPA Final Action

    In this document, we are finalizing the following actions on the 
1998 CAP. For each action, we indicate the page on which the element is 
discussed in our proposal.
    (1) Approval of the revised baseline and projected emissions 
inventories under CAA sections 172(c)(3) and 182(a)(1)--16865;
    (2) Approval of the SBCAPCD's measures 333, 352, 353, T13, T18, 
T21, and T22, including the District's commitment to adopt and 
implement the measures by specified dates (if applicable, in the case 
of the contingency measures) to achieve the identified emission 
reduction, under CAA section 110(k)(3)--16866 (Table 1);
    (3) Approval of the rate-of-progress (ROP) plan for the milestone 
year 1999, under CAA sections 182(c)(2)--16866 (Table 2);
    (4) Approval of the attainment demonstration under CAA sections 
182(c)(2)--16867;
    (5) Approval of the revised motor vehicle emissions budgets for 
purposes of transportation conformity under CAA section 176(c)(2)(A)--
16867.
    In addition, EPA finds that the SBCAPCD has established and 
implemented a Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station (PAMS) 
network meeting the requirements of CAA section 182(c)(1)--16868.
    Upon the effective date of our approval of the 1998 CAP, this plan 
replaces and supersedes the 1994 ozone SIP with the exception of the 
approved State control measures, the local control measures that are 
not amended by the 1998 CAP, and the local transportation control 
measures (TCMs) for which the 1998 CAP augments the TCMs and projects 
included in the 1994 SIP. \1\ Our final approval also makes enforceable 
the SBCAPCD commitments to adopt and implement the control measures and 
contingency measures (if applicable) listed in Table 1 (16866), to 
achieve the specified emissions reductions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We approved Santa Barbara's 1994 ozone plan on January 8, 
1997 (62 FR 1187-1190).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory 
Planning and Review.''

B. Executive Order 13045

    Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 
1997), applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically 
significant'' as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns 
an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe 
may have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory 
action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental 
health or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain 
why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective 
and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does 
not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or 
safety risks.

C. Executive Order 13084

    Under Executive Order 13084, Consultation and Coordination with 
Indian Tribal Governments, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the 
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is

[[Page 49500]]

unfunded, EPA must provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a 
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a 
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with 
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature 
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the 
regulation.
    In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop an 
effective process permitting elected and other representatives of 
Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in 
the development of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or 
uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule does not 
significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal 
governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of Executive 
Order 13084 do not apply to this rule.

D. Executive Order 13132

    Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 
1999) revokes and replaces Executive Orders 12612, Federalism and 
12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership. Executive Order 
13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' Under 
Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a regulation that has 
federalism implications, that imposes substantial direct compliance 
costs, and that is not required by statute, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA consults with 
State and local officials early in the process of developing the 
proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation that has 
federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the Agency 
consults with State and local officials early in the process of 
developing the proposed regulation.
    This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 F.R. 
43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule 
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean 
Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do 
not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies 
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small 
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental 
jurisdictions.
    This final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial 
number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and 
subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new 
requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already 
imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create 
any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under 
the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute 
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

    Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; 
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA 
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
    EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of 
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves 
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new 
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or 
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This rule is not a ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

H. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act 
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing 
technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with 
NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards'' 
(VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies 
unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise 
impractical.
    The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's 
action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to 
the use of VCS.

I. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 13, 2000. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it

[[Page 49501]]

extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Nitrogen 
oxides, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: June 23, 2000.
Laura Yoshii,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(275) to read 
as follows:


Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (275) New and amended plan for the following agency was submitted 
on March 19, 1999, by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Control measures 333, 352, 353, T13, T18, T21, and T22; 1999 
rate-of-progress plan; and motor vehicle emissions budgets (cited on 
page 5-4), as contained in the Santa Barbara 1998 Clean Air Plan.
    (ii Additional materials.
    (A) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Baseline and projected emissions inventories, and ozone 
attainment demonstration, as contained in the Santa Barbara 1998 Clean 
Air Plan.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 00-20535 Filed 8-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P