[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 146 (Friday, July 28, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46366-46370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-18480]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

43 CFR Part 2

RIN 1090-AA76


Legal Process: Testimony of Employees and Production of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Final rule and statement of policy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation amends 43 CFR Part 2, Subpart E, Compulsory 
Process and Testimony of Employees. It generally provides that 
Department employees may not appear as witnesses, concerning 
information acquired in the course of performing official duties or 
because of their official status, or to produce Department records in 
litigation either voluntarily or in response to a subpoena, without the 
consent of the Department. The intended effect of this regulation is to 
conserve the ability of the Department to conduct official business, 
preserve its employee resources, minimize involvement in matters 
unrelated to its mission and programs, preserve its impartially, avoid 
spending public time and money for private purposes, and to help avoid 
needless litigation. This regulation does not apply to Congressional 
inquiries, Federal court

[[Page 46367]]

civil proceedings in which the United States is a party, criminal 
cases, or to Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act requests.

Dates: This regulation is effective July 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy S. Elliott, Deputy Associate 
Solicitor, Division of General Law, Office of the Solicitor, Department 
of the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, telephone: 
(202) 208-4722; Randolph J. Myers, Attorney, Division of Parks and 
Wildlife, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, 1849 C 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, telephone: (202) 208-4338.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Department employees are frequently 
requested or subpoenaed to provide testimony or produce records in 
litigation. Current Department regulations do not clearly specify when 
its employees are required to respond to subpoenas or produce 
Department records. This has resulted in an employee giving testimony 
or providing records, which diverts such employee from performing his/
her duties, and has, at times, created the appearance that the 
Department is taking sides in private litigation. This regulation is 
intended to address this situation by generally prohibiting both 
voluntary appearances and compliance with subpoenas unless authorized 
by the Department.
    Subpoenas to testify concerning information which employees have 
acquired in the course of performing official duties, or to produce 
records, are essentially legal actions against the United States for 
which there has been no waiver of sovereign immunity. The courts have 
recognized the authority of Federal agencies to limit compliance with 
such subpoenas. United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 
(1951). See also United States v. Williams, 170 F.3d 431 (4th Cir. 
1999); Smith v. Cromer, 159 F.3d 875 (4th Cir. 1998); Boron Oil Company 
v. Downie, 873 F.2d 67 (4th Cir. 1989); Davis Enterprises v. E.P.A., 
877 F.2d 1181 (3rd Cir. 1989); Moore v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co., 927 
P.2d 1194 (11th Cir. 1991).
    Moreover, subpoenas by State, territorial or Tribal courts, and 
legislative or administrative bodies, which attempt to assert 
jurisdiction over Federal agencies and their employees, are 
inconsistent with the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. A 
Federal regulation, such as this one prohibiting compliance with such 
subpoenas, is consistent with the Supremacy Clause principle. See 
McCulloch v. Maryland, 7 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819); Houston Business 
Journal, Inc. v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 86 F.3d 
1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996); United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734 (5th Cir. 
1967); Giza v. Secretary of HEW, 628 P.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1980). 
Accordingly, this regulation restricts a Department employee from 
complying with subpoenas from State, territorial or Tribal courts, and 
legislative or administrative bodies without the approval of the 
official in charge of the employee's bureau, division, office or agency 
of the Department.
    In addition, this regulation describes procedures by which the 
Department will make its employees and records available in response to 
subpoenas in Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States 
is not a party. In the event that the Department or its Solicitor's 
Office fails to reach an agreement regarding the proper scope of a 
subpoena, the Solicitor's Office will coordinate with the Department of 
Justice to file appropriate motions, including motions to quash or for 
a protective order. In the case of the Department's Office of Inspector 
General, its General Counsel will attempt to reach an agreement or will 
coordinate with the Department of Justice to file appropriate motions. 
Exxon Shipping Co. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 34 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 
1994) and Comsat Corp. v. National Science Foundation, 190 F.3d 269 
(4th Cir. 1999).
    The regulation does not apply to congressional proceedings. This 
regulation also does not apply to Federal court civil proceedings in 
which the United States is a party, because the Department of Justice 
is already representing the Department's interests and may file 
appropriate protective motions under the Federal Rules of Civil 
Procedure. This regulation likewise does not apply to either Freedom of 
Information Act or Privacy Act requests.
    We also recognize that there are situations in which the Department 
should cooperate with Federal, State, territorial and Tribal 
authorities as part of the Department's responsibility for developing 
and enforcing land and resource standards and other policies. This 
regulation does not preclude these efforts, and the official in charge 
of the employee's bureau, division, office or agency of the Department 
is empowered to authorize such testimony.
    Further, this regulation does not apply to criminal cases before 
Federal, State and Tribal courts where Department employees and records 
are involved. The Department has over 5,000 employees who perform law 
enforcement functions. These and other employees regularly testify in 
Federal, State or Tribal courts in thousands of criminal cases. The 
Department has long-standing procedures with prosecutors which 
adequately address the proper scope of discovery, record production 
requests and witness subpoenas. Once prosecutors are advised by the 
Department of an inappropriate witness subpoena or subpoena duces 
tecum, prosecutors traditionally file motions to quash or for a 
protective order to protect the interests of the Department. As such, 
the Department sees no need to include criminal cases in this 
regulation.
    While this regulation applies to information which employees 
acquire in the course of performing official duties, to production of 
records in Department files and to testimony concerning such records, 
we recognize that there are situations where Department employees may 
properly serve as expert witnesses on subjects outside the scope of 
their official duties and on behalf of private parties. Such situations 
are treated as outside activities under 5 CFR Part 2635, Subpart H, and 
employees providing this testimony are required to comply with those 
regulations and to perform those activities on their own time or while 
in an approved leave status. Employees must also review and comply with 
5 CFR 2635.805, which details a separate authorization procedure for an 
employee to testify as an expert witness, not on behalf of the United 
States, in any proceeding before a court or agency in which the United 
States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. In both 
instances, we require employees to state for the record that they are 
appearing as private individuals and that their testimony does not 
necessarily represent the official views of the Department of the 
Interior.
    We also recognize that employees may, on their own time or while in 
an approved leave status, appear as private citizens in proceedings in 
which Department policies and programs are not at issue. This 
regulation does not restrict such activities.
    Finally, the Department of the Interior is sometimes asked to 
authenticate copies of official records for purposes of admissibility 
under 28 U.S.C. 1733, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44, or comparable 
State or Tribal law. Since official actions and policies can best be 
proved by Department records, and since this regulation provides that 
it is generally inappropriate for employees to appear as witnesses to 
discuss the background of Department policies and action in private 
litigation, this

[[Page 46368]]

regulation provides that we will authenticate a copy of Department 
records on request. See 43 U.S.C. 1460.

Public Comment Procedures

    Since this regulation establishes internal policy for Department 
employees, the Administrative Procedure Act does not require that it be 
published as a proposed regulation for notice and public comment. 5 
U.S.C. 553(a)(2). This regulation revises current regulations and 
provides immediate clarifying guidance on how Department employee 
testimony and Department records may be obtained. As such, the 
Department finds that good cause exists for making the regulation 
effective less than thirty days after publication. 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(3)(B).
    We welcome and encourage public comment by any one of several 
methods. You may mail comments to the Office of the Solicitor, 
Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., Room 6510, Washington, 
DC 20240. For the next six months, you may also comment via e-mail on 
the Internet addressed to: [email protected]. Please submit 
Internet comments as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
characters and any form of encryption. Please also include ``Attn: 
1090-AA76'' and your name and return address in your Internet message. 
If you do not receive a confirmation from the system that we have 
received your Internet message, contact us directly at Office of the 
Solicitor, Division of Parks and Wildlife at (202) 208-4338. Finally, 
you may also fax comments to Office of the Solicitor at (202) 208-1790. 
These are not toll-free numbers.
    Our practice is to make comments, including names and home 
addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular 
business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold 
their home address from the regulation making record, which we will 
honor to the extent allowed by law. There also may be circumstances in 
which we would withhold from the regulation making record a 
respondent's identity, as allowed by law. If you wish us to withhold 
your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the 
beginning of your comment. However, we will not consider anonymous 
comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or 
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as 
representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available 
for public inspection in their entirety.

Drafting Information

    The following persons participated in the writing of this 
regulation: Randolph J. Myers, Arthur E. Gary, Robert H. Moll, Timothy 
S. Elliott, Karen Sprecher Keating, and David A. Watts, Office of the 
Solicitor, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20240.

Compliance With Other Laws

Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)

    This regulation is not a significant rule and is not subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866.
    (1) This regulation will not have an effect of $100 million or more 
on the economy. This regulation regulates how and when Department 
employees and documents may be provided in certain situations. As such, 
it will not adversely affect in a material way the economy, 
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or communities.
    (2) This regulation will not create a serious inconsistency or 
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
    (3) This regulation does not alter the budgetary effects or 
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or 
obligations of their recipients.
    (4) This regulation is consistent with well-established 
constitutional and statutory principles and does not raise novel legal 
or policy issues.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Department of the Interior certifies that this regulation will 
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small 
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. et seq.). This 
regulation merely regulates how and when Department employees may 
testify and that documents may be provided in certain situations.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This regulation is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. Because this 
regulation only regulates how and when Department employees may testify 
and that Department documents may be provided in certain situations, 
this regulation:
    a. Dies not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or 
more.
    b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, local government 
agencies or geographic regions.
    c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation or the ability of 
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This regulation does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, 
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 
million per year. This regulation does not have a significant or unique 
effect on State, local or tribal governments or the private sector 
because this regulation only regulates how and when Department 
employees may testify and Department documents my be provided in 
certain situations. A statement containing the information required by 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not 
required.

Takings (E.O. 12630)

    In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this regulation does not 
have significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment 
is not required.

Federalism (E.O. 13132)

    The Department of the Interior has determined this regulation 
conforms to the Federalism principals of Executive Order 13132. It also 
certifies that to the extent a regulatory preemption occurs, it is 
because the exercise of State and Tribal authority conflicts with the 
exercise of Federal authority under the U.S. Constitution's supremacy 
clause and Federal statute. This regulation is, however, restricted to 
the minimum level necessary to achieve the objections of 5 U.S.C. 301 
pursuant to which this regulation is promulgated.

Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)

    In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the 
Solicitor has determined that this regulation does not unduly burden 
the judicial system, under United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 
U.S. 462 (1951), and does meet the requirements of section 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of the Order.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This regulation contains no reporting or record keeping 
requirements which require approval by the Office of Management and 
Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3510 et seq.

[[Page 46369]]

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

    This regulation is of an administrative, legal and procedural 
nature and therefore is categorically excluded from NEPA, 516 DM 2 
Appendix 1.10. This regulation also does not constitute a major Federal 
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment 
under NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. A detailed statement under the NEPA 
is not required.

List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2

    Administrative practice and procedure, Classified information, 
Freedom of information, and Government employees.

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Department amends 43 CFR 
Part 2, Subpart E as set forth below:
    1. The authority citation for Subpart E is revised to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552 and 552a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 43 U.S.C. 
1460; and Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950, 15 FR 3174.


    2. Sections 2.80 and 2.82 are removed and Title 43, Part 2, Subpart 
E of the Code of Federal Regulations is revised to read as follows:

Subpart E--Legal Process: Testimony by Employees and Production of 
Records

General Information

Sec.
2.80   What does this subpart cover?
2.81   What is the Department's policy on granting requests for 
employee testimony or Department records?

Responsibilities of Requesters

2.82   How can I obtain employee testimony or Department records?
2.83   If I serve a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, must I also 
submit a request under United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 
U.S. 462 (1951)?
2.84   What information must I put in my Touhy Request?
2.85   How much will I be charged?
2.86   Can I get an authenticated copy of a Department record?

Responsibilities of the Department

2.87   How will the Department process my Touhy Request?
2.88   What criteria will the Department consider in responding to 
my Touhy Request?

Responsibilities of Employees

2.89   What must I, as an employee, do upon receiving a request?
2.90   Must I get approval before testifying as an expert witness on 
a subject outside the scope of my official duties?

General Information


Sec. 2.80  What does this subpart cover?

    (a) This subpart describes how the Department of the Interior 
(including all its bureaus and offices) responds to requests or 
subpoenas for:
    (1) Testimony by employees in State, territorial or Tribal 
judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings concerning 
information acquired while performing official duties or because of an 
employee's official status;
    (2) Testimony by employees in Federal court civil proceedings in 
which the United States is not a party concerning information acquired 
while performing official duties or because of an employee's official 
status;
    (3) Testimony by employees in any judicial or administrative 
proceeding in which the United States, while not a party, has a direct 
and substantial interest;
    (4) Official records or certification of such records for use in 
Federal, State, territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative or 
administrative proceedings.
    (b) In this subpart, ``employee'' means a current or former 
Department employee, including a contract or special government 
employee.
    (c) This subpart does not apply to:
    (1) Congressional requests or subpoenas for testimony or records;
    (2) Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States is a 
party;
    (3) Federal administrative proceedings;
    (4) Federal, State and Tribal criminal court proceedings;
    (5) Employees who voluntarily testify, while on their own time or 
in approved leave status, as private citizens as to facts or events 
that are not related to the official business of the Department. The 
employee must state for the record that the testimony represents the 
employee's own views and is not necessarily the official position of 
the Department. See 5 CFR Secs. 2635.702(b), 2635.807 (b).
    (6) Testimony by employees as expert witnesses on subjects outside 
their official duties, except that they must obtain prior approval if 
required by Sec. 2.90.
    (d) This subpart does not affect the rights of any individual or 
the procedures for obtaining records under the Freedom of Information 
Act (FOIA), Privacy Act, or statutes governing the certification of 
official records. The Department FOIA and Privacy Act regulations are 
found at 43 CFR Part 2, subparts B and D.
    (e) Nothing in this subpart is intended to impede the appropriate 
disclosure under applicable laws of Department information to Federal, 
State, territorial, Tribal, or foreign law enforcement, prosecutorial, 
or regulatory agencies.
    (f) This subpart only provides guidance for the internal operations 
of the Department, and neither creates nor is intended to create any 
enforceable right or benefit against the United States.


Sec. 2.81  What is the Department's policy on granting requests for 
employee testimony or Department records?

    (a) Except for proceedings covered by Sec. 2.80(c) and (d), it is 
the Department's general policy not to allow its employees to testify 
or to produce Department records either upon request or by subpoena. 
However, if you request in writing, the Department will consider 
whether to allow testimony or production of records under this subpart. 
The Department's policy ensures the orderly execution of its mission 
and programs while not impeding any proceeding inappropriately.
    (b) No Department employee may testify or produce records in any 
proceeding to which this subpart applies unless authorized by the 
Department under Secs. 2.80 through 2.90 United States ex rel. Touhy v. 
Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951).

Responsibilities of Requesters


Sec. 2.82  How can I obtain employee testimony or Department records?

    (a) To obtain employee testimony, you must submit:
    (1) A written request (hereafter a ``Touhy Request;'' see Sec. 2.84 
and United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951)); and
    (2) A statement that you will submit a check for costs to the 
Department of the Interior, in accordance with Sec. 2.85, if your Touhy 
Request is granted.
    (b) To obtain official Department records, you must submit:
    (1) A Touhy Request; and
    (2) A Statement that you agree to pay the costs of duplication in 
accordance with 43 CFR Part 2, appendix A, if your Touhy Request is 
granted.
    (c) You must send your Touhy Request to:
    (1) The employee's office address;
    (2) The official in charge of the employee's bureau, division, 
office or agency; and
    (3) The appropriate unit of the Solicitor's Office.
    (d) To obtain employee testimony or records of the Office of 
Inspector General, you must send your Touhy Request to the General 
Counsel for the Office of Inspector General.
    (e) 43 CFR Part 2, Appendix B contains a list of the addresses of 
the

[[Page 46370]]

Department's bureaus and offices and the units of the Solicitor's 
Office. The General Counsel for the Inspector General is located at the 
address for the Office of the Inspector General. If you do not know the 
employee's address, you may obtain it from the employee's bureau or 
office.


Sec. 2.83  If I serve a subpoena duces tecum, must I also submit a 
Touhy request?

    Yes. If you serve a subpoena for employee testimony, you also must 
submit a request under United States ex rel. Touhy v. Regan, 340 U.S. 
462 (1951)? If you serve a subpoena duces tecum for records in the 
possession of the Department, you also must submit a Touhy Request.


Sec. 2.84  What information must I put in my Touhy Request?

    Your Touhy Request must:
    (a) Identify the employee or record;
    (b) Describe the relevance of the desired testimony or records to 
your proceeding and provide a copy of the pleadings underlying your 
request;
    (c) Identify the parties to your proceeding and any known 
relationships they have to the Department's mission or programs;
    (d) Show that the desired testimony or records are not reasonably 
available from any other source;
    (e) Show that no record could be provided and used in lieu of 
employee testimony;
    (f) Provide the substance of the testimony expected of the 
employee; and
    (g) Explain why you believe your Touhy Request complies with 
Sec. 2.88.


Sec. 2.85  How much will I be charged?

    We will charge you the costs, including travel expenses, for 
employees to testify under the relevant substantive and procedural laws 
and regulations. You must pay costs for record production under 43 CFR 
Part 2, Appendix A. Costs must be paid by check or money order payable 
to the Department of the Interior.


Sec. 2.86  Can I get an authenticated copy of a Department record?

    Yes. We may provide an authenticated copy of a Department record, 
for purposes of admissibility under Federal, State or Tribal law. We 
will do this only if the record has been officially released or would 
otherwise be released under Sec. 2.13 or this Subpart.

Responsibility of the Department


Sec. 2.87  How will the Department process my Touhy Request?

    (a) The appropriate Department official will decide whether to 
grant or deny your Touhy Request. Our Solicitor's Office or, in the 
case of the Office of Inspector General, its General Counsel, may 
negotiate with you or your attorney to refine or limit both the timing 
and content of your Touhy Request. When necessary, the Solicitor's 
Office or, in the case of the Office of Inspector General, its General 
Counsel, also will coordinate with the Department of Justice to file 
appropriate motions, including motions to remove the matter to Federal 
court, to quash, or to obtain a protective order.
    (b) We will limit our decision to allow employee testimony to the 
scope of your Touhy Request.
    (c) If you fail to follow the requirements of this Subpart, we will 
not allow the testimony or produce the records.
    (d) If your Touhy Request is complete, we will consider the request 
under Sec. 2.88.


Sec. 2.88  What criteria will the Department consider in responding to 
my Touhy Request?

    In deciding whether to grant your Touhy Request, the appropriate 
Department official will consider:
    (a) Your ability to obtain the testimony or records from another 
source;
    (b) The appropriateness of the employee testimony and record 
production under the relevant regulations of procedure and substantive 
law, including the FOIA or the Privacy Act; and
    (c) Our ability to:
    (1) Conduct our official business unimpeded;
    (2) Maintain impartiality in conducting our business;
    (3) Minimize the possibility that we will become involved in issues 
that are not related to our mission or programs;
    (4) Avoid spending public employee's time for private purposes;
    (5) Avoid the negative cumulative effect of granting similar 
requests;
    (6) Ensure that privileged or protected matters remain 
confidential; and
    (7) Avoid undue burden on us.

Responsibilities of Employees


Sec. 2.89  What must I, as an employee, do upon receiving a request?

    (a) If you receive a request or subpoena that does not include a 
Touhy Request, you must immediately notify your supervisor and the 
Solicitor's Office, or the General Counsel of the Office of the 
Inspector General, as applicable, for assistance in issuing the proper 
response.
    (b) If you receive a Touhy Request, you must promptly notify your 
supervisor and forward the request to the head of your bureau, division 
or office. After consulting with the Solicitor's Office or, in the case 
of the Office of Inspector General, its General Counsel, the official 
in charge will decide whether to grant the Touhy Request under 
Sec. 2.88.
    (c) All decisions granting or denying a Touhy Request must be in 
writing. The official in charge must ask the applicable unit of the 
Solicitor's Office or, in the case of the Office of Inspector General, 
its General Counsel, for advice when preparing the decision.
    (d) Under 28 U.S.C. 1733, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1), 
or comparable State or Tribal law, a request for an authenticated copy 
of a Department record may be granted by the person having the legal 
custody of the record. If you believe that you have custody of a 
record:
    (1) Consult your delegated authority to determine if you can grant 
a request for authentication of records; and
    (2) Consult the Solicitor's Office or, in the case of the Office of 
Inspector General, its General Counsel, concerning the proper form of 
the authentication (as authentication requirements may vary by 
jurisdiction).


Sec. 2.90  Must I get approval before testifying as an expert witness 
on a subject outside the scope of my official duties?

    (a) You must comply with 5 CFR 2635.805(c), which details the 
authorization procedure for an employee to testify as an expert 
witness, not on behalf of the United States, in any judicial or 
administrative proceeding in which the United States is a party or has 
a direct and substantial interest. This procedure means:
    (1) You must obtain the written approval of your Deputy Ethics 
Official;
    (2) You must be in an approved leave status if you testify during 
duty hours; and
    (3) You must state for the record that you are appearing as a 
private individual and that your testimony does not represent the 
official views of the Department.
    (b) If you testify as an expert witness on a matter outside the 
scope of yoru official duties, and which is not covered by paragraph 
(a) of this section, you must comply with 5 CFR 2635.802 and 5 CFR 
3501.105.

    Dated: July 11, 2000.
John D. Leshy,
Solicitor.
[FR Doc. 00-18480 Filed 7-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M.