[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 145 (Thursday, July 27, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46216-46218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-18399]



[[Page 46216]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2000-NM-35-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series 
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model 
MD-11 series airplanes. This proposal would require an inspection of 
the electrical wires routed above the door actuation cables for minimum 
.50-inch clearance with the door in the open and closed position, 
damage due to chafing or electrical arcing, or damaged door actuation 
cables; and corrective actions, if necessary. This action is necessary 
to prevent damaged electrical wires or damaged door actuation cables 
due to chafing by the cables during operation of the forward passenger 
door, which could result in electrical arcing and consequent smoke in 
the area above the forward passenger door. This action is intended to 
address the identified unsafe condition.

DATES: Comments must be received by September 11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-35-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232. 
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address: 
[email protected]. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must 
contain ``Docket No. 2000-NM-35-AD'' in the subject line and need not 
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached 
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or 
ASCII text.
    The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: 
Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). 
This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Portwood, Aerospace Engineer, 
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount 
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5350; 
fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
light of the comments received.
    Submit comments using the following format:
     Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a 
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the 
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
     For each issue, state what specific change to the proposed 
AD is being requested.
     Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each 
request.
    Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
to Docket Number 2000-NM-35-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
Docket No. 2000-NM-35-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
98055-4056.

Discussion

    As part of its practice of re-examining all aspects of the service 
experience of a particular aircraft whenever an accident occurs, the 
FAA has become aware of an incident of an electrical wire chafed by an 
actuation cable of the forward passenger door when the door was in the 
full open position. This incident occurred on a McDonnell Douglas Model 
MD-11 series airplane. Investigation revealed that the existing routing 
of the electrical wires of the forward passenger door could cause the 
electrical wires to be chafed by the door actuation cables during 
operation of the door. Investigation also revealed that the electrical 
wires were not routed properly during manufacturing of the airplane. 
This condition, if not corrected, could result in damaged electrical 
wires or damaged door actuation cables, which could result in 
electrical arcing and consequent smoke in the area above the forward 
passenger door.
    This incident is not considered to be related to an accident that 
occurred off the coast of Nova Scotia involving a McDonnell Douglas 
Model MD-11 series airplane. The cause of that accident is still under 
investigation.

Other Related Rulemaking

    The FAA, in conjunction with Boeing and operators of Model MD-11 
series airplanes, is continuing to review all aspects of the service 
history of those airplanes to identify potential unsafe conditions and 
to take appropriate corrective actions. This airworthiness directive 
(AD) is one of a series of actions identified during that process. The 
process is continuing and the FAA may consider additional rulemaking 
actions as further results of the review become available.

Explanation of Relevant Service Information

    The FAA has reviewed and approved McDonnell Douglas Alert Service 
Bulletin MD11-24A182, dated April 3, 2000, which describes procedures 
for a one-time general visual inspection of the electrical wires routed 
above the door actuation cables for minimum .50-inch clearance with the 
door in the open and closed position, damage due to chafing or 
electrical arcing, or damaged door actuation cables; and corrective

[[Page 46217]]

actions, if necessary. The corrective actions include loosening the 
wire clamps as necessary; repositioning electrical wires to provide 
minimum clearance; tightening wire clamps; replacing damaged electrical 
wires with new wires or repairing damaged wires; and replacing damaged 
door actuation cables with new cables. Accomplishment of the actions 
specified in the service bulletin is intended to adequately address the 
identified unsafe condition.

Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule

    Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions specified in 
the service bulletin described previously.

Cost Impact

    There are approximately 187 Model MD-11 series airplanes of the 
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 64 
airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that 
it would take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish the 
proposed inspection, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work 
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection 
proposed by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,680, or 
$120 per airplane.
    The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of 
this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in 
the future if this proposed AD were not adopted. The cost impact 
figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time 
necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. 
These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the 
time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time 
necessitated by other administrative actions.

Regulatory Impact

    The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
regulation (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
airworthiness directive:

McDonnell Douglas: Docket 2000-NM-35-AD.

    Applicability: Model MD-11 series airplanes, as listed in 
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A182, dated April 3, 
2000; certificated in any category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To prevent damaged electrical wires or damaged door actuation 
cables due to chafing by the cables during operation of the forward 
passenger door, which could result in electrical arcing and 
consequent smoke in the area above the forward passenger door, 
accomplish the following:

Inspection

    (a) Except as provided by paragarph (b) of this AD, within 6 
months after the effective date of this AD, perform a one-time 
general visual inspection of the electrical wires routed above the 
door actuation cables for minimum .50-inch clearance with the door 
in the open and closed position, damage due to chafing or electrical 
arcing, or damaged door actuation cables, in accordance with 
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A182, dated April 3, 
2000.

    Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection 
is defined as ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior 
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, 
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally 
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, 
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of 
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be 
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''

Condition 1 (Minimum Clearance and No Chafed Electrical Wiring or 
Damaged Door Actuation Cables)

    (1) If minimum .50-inch clearance exists between the electrical 
wires and door actuation cables with the door in the open and closed 
positions, and if no chafed electrical wiring or damaged door 
actuation cable is detected, no further action is required by this 
AD.

Condition 2 (Less Than Minimum Clearance, No Chafed Electrical Wiring 
or Damaged Door Actuation Cables)

    (2) If less than .50-inch clearance exists between the 
electrical wires and door actuation cables with the door in the open 
and closed positions, and if no chafed electrical wiring or damaged 
door actuation cable is detected, before further flight, loosen wire 
clamps as necessary, reposition electrical wires to provide minimum 
clearance, and tighten wire clamps, in accordance with the service 
bulletin.

Condition 3 (Less Than Minimum Clearance, Chafed Electrical Wiring or 
Damaged Door Actuation Cables)

    (3) If less than .50-inch clearance exists between the 
electrical wires and door actuation cables with the door in the open 
and closed positions, and if any chafed electrical wiring or damaged 
door actuation cable is detected, before further flight, replace 
damaged electrical wires with new wires or repair damaged wires, 
loosen wire clamps as necessary, reposition electrical wires to 
provide minimum clearance, tighten wire clamps, and replace damaged 
door actuation cables with new cables, in accordance with the 
service bulletin.

Exception to Inspection Required in Paragraph (a) of This AD

    (b) For Model MD-11 series airplanes, the inspection required by 
paragraph (a) of this AD is only applicable to functioning doors. 
For Model MD-11F series airplanes or Model MD-11 series airplanes 
converted to a freighter configuration, equipped with one or more 
disabled non-functioning doors that do

[[Page 46218]]

not have door acuating cables, the inspection is NOT required for 
those disabled doors.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.

Special Flight Permit

    (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 14, 2000.
John J. Hickey,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-18399 Filed 7-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U