[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20854-20860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9206]



[[Page 20853]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





Department of Defense

General Services Administration

National Aeronautics and Space Administration





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



48 CFR Parts 30 and 52



Federal Acquisition Regulation; Cost Accounting Standards 
Administration; Proposed Rule

  Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 18, 2000 / 
Proposed Rules  

[[Page 20854]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 30 and 52

[FAR Case 1999-025]
RIN 9000-AI70


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Cost Accounting Standards 
Administration

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense 
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) are proposing to amend the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to delineate the process for 
determining and resolving the cost impact on contracts and subcontracts 
when a contractor makes a compliant change to a cost accounting 
practice or follows a noncompliant practice.

DATES: Interested parties should submit comments in writing on or 
before June 19, 2000 to be considered in the formulation of a final 
rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to: General Services Administration, 
FAR Secretariat (MVRS), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, ATTN: Laurie 
Duarte, Washington, DC 20405. Submit electronic comments via the 
Internet to: [email protected]. Please submit comments only and 
cite FAR case 1999-025 in all correspondence related to this case.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS 
Building, Washington, DC, 20405, at (202) 501-4755 for information 
pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of 
content, contact Mr. Jeremy Olson at (202) 501-0692. Please cite FAR 
case 1999-025.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    FAR Part 30, Cost Accounting Standards Administration, describes 
policies and procedures for applying the Cost Accounting Standards 
Board (CASB) rules and regulations to negotiated contracts and 
subcontracts. The CASB's rules, regulations, and Cost Accounting 
Standards (CAS) are codified at 48 CFR Chapter 99 (FAR Appendix). 
Negotiated contracts not exempt in accordance with 48 CFR 9903.201-1(b) 
are subject to CAS (CAS-covered contracts).
    The CASB found that the Government does not always implement in a 
uniform manner the administrative process for making contract price and 
cost adjustments resulting from contractor changes in cost accounting 
practice. The CASB further found that the procedures and processes are 
not widely understood or adequately documented.
    This proposed FAR rule delineates the entire cost-impact process 
the Government and contractor must follow when a contractor makes a 
compliant change to a cost accounting practice or follows a 
noncompliant practice. The rule should make the cost-impact process 
easier to understand, thereby reducing the overall amount of 
administrative effort currently being expended to resolve individual 
cases. Specifically, the rule--
    1. Defines the cognizant Federal agency official (CFAO) as the 
contracting officer assigned to administer CAS for all contracts in a 
business unit. The CFAO's functions are to make determinations for all 
CAS-covered contracts and subcontracts, including--
    a. Whether a change in cost accounting practice or a noncompliance 
has occurred; and
    b. If a change in cost accounting practice or a noncompliance has 
occurred, how any resulting cost impacts are resolved;
    2. Provides procedures that the Government and the contractor must 
follow when there are voluntary (including desirable) changes to 
disclosed or established cost accounting practices, mandatory changes 
required to comply with new or modified standards, and noncompliances 
with CAS.
    3. Provides a streamlined process that does not require submission 
of cost-impact estimates or contract price adjustments for every CAS-
covered contract affected by the change in cost accounting practice. 
The process creates a three-step sequential process that includes--
    a. An initial evaluation to determine materiality of the changes;
    b. If the cost is material, the use of a general dollar magnitude 
(GDM) proposal, whereby the contractor is provided the opportunity to 
include only the minimum data needed to resolve the cost impact. The 
rule encourages settlement of material cost impacts based on the GDM 
proposal to the maximum extent possible; and
    c. If the GDM proposal is insufficient or inadequately supported, 
the submission of a detailed cost-impact proposal.
    4. Provides revised procedures for negotiating and resolving the 
cost impact, including--
    a. Requiring the CFAO to invite all contracting officers to 
participate in negotiations when the cost or price of any of their 
contracts may be increased or decreased by at least $100,000 (the 
current amount is $10,000);
    b. Providing the CFAO with significant flexibility to resolve the 
cost impact by permitting the CFAO to use an alternate method, rather 
than the method of adjusting all affected contracts, provided the 
Government will not pay more, in the aggregate, than it would have paid 
if the CFAO did not use the alternate method; and
    c. Requiring the CFAO to execute all contract modifications 
concurrently.
    This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review 
under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and 
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 
U.S.C. 804.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Councils do not expect this proposed rule to have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the 
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., 
because contracts and subcontracts with small businesses are exempt 
from all CAS requirements in accordance with 48 CFR 9903.201-1(b)(3). 
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has, therefore, not been 
performed. We invite comments from small businesses and other 
interested parties. The Councils will consider comments from small 
entities concerning the affected FAR subparts in accordance with 5 
U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and 
should cite 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. (FAR case 1999-025), in 
correspondence.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L. 104-13) applies because the 
proposed rule contains information collection requirements. FAR Part 30 
requires certain contractors to provide information on CAS-covered 
subcontractors and to submit cost-impact proposals when there are 
changes in cost accounting practices. The collection of this 
information is currently approved under Office of Management and Budget 
Number 9000-0129. The proposed rule decreases the collection 
requirements, since the rule provides a--

[[Page 20855]]

    1. Specific, but flexible, cost-impact process that should reduce 
the overall administrative burden currently being experienced by 
contractors; and
    2. General format for contractors to use in preparing cost-impact 
proposals. This format includes flexible criteria that permit the 
contractor an opportunity to include only the minimum data needed to 
resolve the cost impact.

Annual Reporting Burden

    Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average 175 hours per response, including the time for 
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information.
    The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows:
    Respondents: 644.
    Responses per respondent: 2.27.
    Total annual responses: 1461.88.
    Preparation hours per response: Reduced from 200.73 to 175.00.
    Total response burden hours: Reduced from 293,471 to 255,829.
    Accordingly, a request for amendment of information collection 
requirements will be submitted to OMB at the final rule stage.

D. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden

    Submit comments, including suggestions for reducing this burden, 
not later than June 19, 2000 to: FAR Desk Officer, OMB, Room 10102, 
NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and a copy to the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, 
Washington, DC 20405.
    Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
functions of the FAR, and whether it will have practical utility; 
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of 
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and ways in which we can minimize the 
burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, 
through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.
    Requester may obtain a copy of the justification from the General 
Services Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVR), Room 4035, Washington, 
DC 20405, telephone (202) 208-7312. Please cite OMB control number 
9000-0129, FAR Case 1999-025, Cost Accounting Administration, in all 
correspondence.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 30 and 52

    Government procurement.

    Dated: April 10, 2000.
Jeremy F. Olson,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
    Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose that 48 CFR parts 30 and 52 
be amended as set forth below:
    1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 30 and 52 continues to 
read as follows:

    Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
U.S.C. 2473(c).

PART 30--COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

    2. Add section 30.001 to read as follows:


30.001  Definition.

    Cognizant Federal agency official (CFAO), as used in this part, 
means the contracting officer assigned by the cognizant Federal agency 
to administer the Cost Accounting Standards.
    3. Amend section 30.202-6 by revising paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) 
to read as follows:


30.202-6  Responsibilities.

* * * * *
    (b) The contracting officer must not award a CAS-covered contract 
until the cognizant Federal agency official (CFAO) (see 30.601) has 
made a written determination that a required Disclosure Statement is 
adequate unless, in order to protect the Government's interest, the 
contracting officer waives the requirement for an adequacy 
determination before award. In this event, the CFAO must make a 
determination of adequacy as soon as possible after the award.
    (c) The auditor is responsible for conducting reviews of Disclosure 
Statements for adequacy and compliance.
    (d) The CFAO is responsible for determinations of adequacy and 
compliance of the Disclosure Statement.
    4. Revise section 30.202-7 to read as follows:


30.202-7    Determinations.

    (a) Adequacy determination. (1) As prescribed by 48 CFR 9903.202-6 
(FAR Appendix), the auditor must--
    (i) Conduct a review of the Disclosure Statement to ascertain 
whether it is current, accurate, and complete; and
    (ii) Report the results to the CFAO.
    (2) The CFAO must determine if the Disclosure Statement adequately 
describes the contractor's cost accounting practices and take one of 
the following actions:
    (i) If the Disclosure Statement is inadequate, request a revised 
Disclosure Statement and identify any areas of inadequacy.
    (ii) If the Disclosure Statement is adequate, notify the contractor 
in writing, with copies to the auditor and contracting officer. The 
notice of adequacy must state that the contractor must not consider a 
disclosed practice, by virtue of such disclosure, an approved practice 
for pricing proposals or accumulating and reporting contract 
performance cost data.
    (3) Generally, the CFAO should furnish the contractor notification 
of adequacy or inadequacy within 30 days after the CFAOs receives the 
Disclosure Statement.
    (b) Compliance determination. (1) After the notification of 
adequacy, the auditor must--
    (i) Conduct a detailed compliance review to ascertain whether or 
not the disclosed practices comply with part 31 and the CAS; and
    (ii) Advise the CFAO of the results.
    (2) The CFAO--
    (i) Must take action regarding noncompliance with CAS under FAR 
30.605;
    (ii) May require a revised Disclosure Statement and adjustment of 
the contract price or cost allowance; and
    (iii) Must process a noncompliance with part 31 separately, in 
accordance with normal administrative practices.
    5. Amend section 30.202-8 by revising paragraph (a) to read as 
follows:


30.202-8  Subcontractor disclosure statements.

    (a) When the Government requires determinations of adequacy or 
inadequacy of subcontractor disclosure statements, the CFAO of the 
subcontractor must provide this determination to the CFAO of the 
contractor or next higher-tier subcontractor. The CFAO(s) of the 
higher-tier subcontractor or contractor must not reverse the 
determination of the CFAO of the subcontractor.
* * * * *
    6. Section 30.601 is revised to read as follows:


30.601  Responsibility.

    (a) The cognizant Federal agency must perform CAS administration 
for all contracts in a business unit even when the contracting officer 
retains other administration functions. The CFAO must make all required 
determinations for all CAS-covered contracts and subcontracts, 
including--

[[Page 20856]]

    (1) Whether a change in cost accounting practice or noncompliance 
has occurred; and
    (2) If a change in cost accounting practice or noncompliance has 
occurred, how any resulting cost impacts are resolved.
    (b) Within 30 days after the award of any new contract or 
subcontract subject to CAS, the contracting officer, contractor, or 
subcontractor making the award must request the CFAO to perform 
administration for CAS matters (see subpart 42.2).


30.602  [Redesignated as 30.603 and revised]

    6a. Remove section 30.603 and redesignate section 30.602 as 30.603 
and revise it to read as follows:


30.603  Changes to disclosed or established cost accounting practices.


30.602  [Added]

    6b. Add a new section 30.602 to read as follows:


30.602  Materiality.

    Agencies must adjust contracts (or use another suitable method (see 
30.606)) and withhold amounts payable for CAS noncompliances, new 
standards, or voluntary changes only if the CFAO determines that the 
amounts involved are material. The CFAO must--
    (a) In determining materiality, use the criteria in 48 CFR 9903.305 
(FAR Appendix); and
    (b) If the CFAO determines that the amount involved is immaterial--
    (1) Make no contract adjustments; and
    (2) In the case of noncompliance issues, inform the contractor that 
if the noncompliance is not corrected, the Government reserves the 
right to make appropriate contract adjustments should the cost impact 
become material in the future.


30.602-1 and 30.602-2  [Removed]

    6c. Sections 30.602-1 and 30.602-2 are removed.
    6d. Section 30.603-1 is added to read as follows:


30.603-1  Mandatory changes required to comply with new or modified 
standards.

    (a) General. (1) Offerors must state whether or not the award of 
the contemplated contract would require a change to established cost 
accounting practices affecting existing contracts and subcontracts (see 
52.230-1). The contracting officer must ensure that the contractor's 
response to the notice is made known to the CFAO.
    (2) A new or modified standard--
    (i) Is applicable prospectively to contracts and subcontracts 
awarded before the effective date of the new or modified standard when 
a new contract or subcontract containing the clause at 52.230-2 or 
52.230-5 is awarded on or after the effective date of the new or 
modified standard; and
    (ii) May require equitable adjustments, but only to those contracts 
or subcontracts awarded before the effective date of the new or 
modified standard (see 52.230-2 or 52.230-5).
    (3) Contracting officers should encourage contractors to submit to 
the CFAO any change in accounting practice in anticipation of complying 
with a new or modified standard as soon as practical after the CASB 
promulgates the new or modified standard.
    (b) Accounting changes. Contractors must submit a description of 
any change in cost accounting practice required to comply with a new or 
modified CAS within 60 days (or other mutually agreed to date) after 
award of a contract requiring a change (see 52.230-6).


30.602-3  [Redesignated as 30.603-2 and revised]

    6e. Section 30.602-3 is redesignated as 30.603-2 and revised to 
read as follows:


30.603-2  Voluntary changes.

    (a) General. The contractor may voluntarily change its disclosed or 
established cost accounting practices. The Government may adjust the 
contract price for voluntary changes. However, the Government must not 
allow increased costs, in the aggregate, resulting from a voluntary 
change unless the CFAO determines that the change is desirable and not 
detrimental to the interests of the Government.
    (b) Accounting changes. The contractor must notify the CFAO and 
submit a description of any voluntary cost accounting practice change 
not less than 60 days (or such other date as may be mutually agreed to) 
before implementation of the voluntary change (see 52.230-6).
    (c) Desirable changes. When a contractor requests that a voluntary 
change be deemed desirable, the CFAO must promptly evaluate the 
contractor's request and must, as soon as practical, notify the 
contractor in writing whether the change is or is not desirable.
    (d) Retroactive changes. If a contractor requests that a voluntary 
change (including those requested to be deemed desirable) include a 
retroactive applicability date (e.g., to the beginning of the current 
contractor fiscal year in which the notification is made), the 
contractor must submit the rationale for the action. The CFAO must 
promptly evaluate the contractor's request and must, as soon as 
practical, notify the contractor in writing whether the change is or is 
not retroactive.
    (e) Contractor changes without Government notification. If a 
contractor implements any change in cost accounting practice without 
submitting the notice required under this subsection, the CFAO must 
consider the change a failure to follow a cost accounting practice 
consistently and process it as a noncompliance in accordance with 
30.605.
    6f. Sections 30.604 through 30.607 are added to read as follows:


30.604  Processing changes to disclosed or established cost accounting 
practices.

    (a) Scope. This section applies to mandatory and voluntary 
(including desirable) changes in cost accounting practices.
    (b) Procedures. Upon receipt of the contractor's notification and 
description of the change in cost accounting practice, the CFAO, with 
the assistance of the auditor, should review the proposed change 
concurrently for adequacy and compliance. If the CFAO--
    (1) Identifies any area of inadequacy, the CFAO must request a 
revised description of the new cost accounting practice;
    (2) Determines that the disclosed practice is noncompliant, the 
CFAO must notify the contractor in writing that, if implemented, the 
CFAO will handle the accounting change as a noncompliance; or
    (3) Determines the description of the change is both adequate and 
compliant, the CFAO must notify the contractor in writing. If the CFAO 
determines--
    (i) The cost impact is material, the CFAO must--
    (A) Request that the contractor submit, by a specified date, a 
general dollar magnitude (GDM) proposal; and
    (B) Attempt to use the contractor's GDM proposal to the maximum 
extent possible to negotiate and resolve the cost impact; or
    (ii) The cost impact is immaterial, the CFAO must provide 
notification to the contractor, and conclude the cost-impact process 
with no contract adjustments.
    (c) General dollar magnitude (GDM) proposal. The GDM proposal--
    (1) Provides information to the CFAO on the estimated overall 
impact of a change in cost accounting practice on affected CAS-covered 
contracts and subcontracts that were awarded based on the previous 
accounting practice; and
    (2) Assists the CFAO in determining whether individual contract or

[[Page 20857]]

subcontract price adjustments are required.
    (d) General dollar magnitude proposal content. The GDM proposal 
must--
    (1) Include a sufficient number of individual contract and/or 
subcontract cost-impact estimates, by contract number and agency, to 
support the GDM estimate (including identification of the individual 
contracts with the largest dollar impact);
    (2) Include by contract type an ``All Other'' category to reflect 
the total cost impact for those contracts not separately identified by 
the contractor in paragraph (d)(1) of this section;
    (3) Provide a computation of the cost impact based on the 
difference between the estimated costs to complete under the current 
practice and the estimated costs to complete under the revised 
practice;
    (4) Provide a computation of the cost impact using a consistent 
cost baseline. A consistent cost baseline means that the amounts before 
and after the change are not based on different scopes of contract 
efforts, levels of operation, methods of operation, or other 
information that is not related specifically to the cost accounting 
practice change. The cost impact must be based on the revised forward 
pricing rates and current contract estimates to complete that 
incorporate the new cost accounting practice;
    (5) Group the CAS-covered contracts by contract type, limited to 
the following contract types:
    (i) Firm-fixed-price.
    (ii) Time-and-materials.
    (iii) Incentive-type (e.g., fixed-price incentive and cost-plus-
incentive-fee).
    (iv) Cost-reimbursement other than incentive-type (e.g., cost-plus-
fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee); and
    (6) Recommend specific contract adjustments to settle the cost 
impact of the cost accounting practice change.
    (e) CFAO evaluation. The CFAO must promptly evaluate the GDM 
proposal. If the cost impact is--
    (1) Material, the CFAO must--
    (i) Negotiate and resolve the cost impact (see 30.606);
    (ii) Request that the contractor submit, by a specified date, a 
revised GDM proposal with specific additional individual contract data 
(e.g., contracts with a dollar impact exceeding a specific dollar 
amount); or
    (iii) Request a detailed cost-impact (DCI) proposal if the CFAO 
determines that the GDM proposal cannot be adequately supported or does 
not contain sufficient data to resolve the cost impact. The CFAO must 
indicate in the written request to the contractor that the DCI proposal 
must include all contracts and subcontracts having an estimate to 
complete exceeding a specified amount, established by the CFAO, that is 
based on the old cost accounting practice. The specified amount must be 
high enough so that the DCI proposal does not contain an excessive 
number of contracts and subcontracts but results in the proposal 
recognizing a reasonably high dollar percentage of the total estimate 
to complete; or
    (2) Immaterial, the CFAO must provide notification to the 
contractor, and conclude the cost-impact process with no contract 
adjustments.
    (f) Detailed cost impact (DCI) proposal. The DCI proposal must--
    (1) Measure the magnitude of the impact of the change on existing 
CAS-covered contracts and subcontracts subject to adjustment;
    (2) Include all contracts and subcontracts having an estimate to 
complete, based on the old accounting practice, exceeding a specified 
amount established by the CFAO;
    (3) Include, by contract type, an ``All Other'' category to reflect 
the total cost impact for those contracts that do not exceed the 
specified amount; and
    (4) Group the CAS-covered contracts by contract type, limited to 
the following contract types:
    (i) Firm-fixed-price.
    (ii) Time-and-materials.
    (iii) Incentive-type (e.g., fixed-price incentive and cost-plus-
incentive-fee).
    (iv) Cost-reimbursement other than incentive-type (e.g., cost-plus-
fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee).
    (g) Contract adjustments. The CFAO--
    (1) Negotiates and resolves the cost impact on behalf of all 
Government agencies;
    (2) Must invite contracting officers to participate in negotiations 
when the cost or price of any of their contracts may be increased or 
decreased by at least $100,000;
    (3) At the conclusion of negotiations, must prepare a negotiation 
memorandum and send copies to auditors and contracting officers;
    (4) If contract adjustments are necessary, must distribute 
modifications to the awarding agencies, requesting signatures by a 
specified date. The awarding agencies must return the signed 
modifications by the specified date or notify the CFAO of the reasons 
for the delay;
    (5) After receipt of the signed modifications described in 
paragraph (f)(4) of this section, must concurrently obtain contractor 
signatures on all the modifications; and
    (6) May unilaterally adjust the contract(s) if the CFAO and the 
contractor fail to agree on the adjustment.
    (h) Remedies. If the contractor does not submit the accounting 
change description or the required cost-impact proposal, the CFAO--
    (1) With the assistance of the auditor, should estimate the general 
dollar magnitude of the cost impact on CAS-covered contracts and 
subcontracts;
    (2) May withhold an amount not to exceed 10 percent of each 
subsequent payment related to the contractor's CAS-covered contracts 
(up to the estimated general dollar magnitude of the cost impact), 
until the contractor furnishes the required information; and
    (3) May unilaterally adjust the contract(s).


30.605  Noncompliance with CAS requirements.

    (a) Types of noncompliances. (1) A cost-estimating noncompliance 
occurs when there is a failure, when estimating proposal costs, to 
follow--
    (i) Applicable CAS requirements; or
    (ii) Consistently disclosed or established accounting practices.
    (2) A cost-accumulation noncompliance occurs when there is a 
failure, when accumulating costs, to follow--
    (i) Applicable CAS requirements; or
    (ii) Consistently disclosed or established accounting practices.
    (b) Determination of noncompliance. (1) The CFAO must make an 
initial finding of compliance or noncompliance and notify the auditor 
within 15 days after receiving a report of alleged noncompliance from 
the auditor.
    (2) If the CFAO makes an initial finding of noncompliance, the CFAO 
must--
    (i) Immediately notify the contractor in writing of the exact 
nature of the noncompliance; and
    (ii) Allow the contractor 60 days to agree or to submit reasons why 
the contractor considers the existing practices to be in compliance.
    (3) The CFAO must--
    (i) Review the reasons why the contractor considers the existing 
practices to be in compliance;
    (ii) Make a determination of compliance or noncompliance;
    (iii) Notify the contractor and the auditor in writing of the 
determination of compliance or noncompliance, including a written 
explanation as to why the CFAO agrees or disagrees with the 
contractor's rationale; and
    (iv) If the CFAO makes a determination of noncompliance, follow the 
procedures in paragraphs (c) through (h) of this section, as 
appropriate.

[[Page 20858]]

    (c) Correcting noncompliances. (1) The contractor must submit a 
description of any cost accounting practice change needed to correct a 
noncompliance (see 52.230-6).
    (2) The CFAO--
    (i) With the assistance of the auditor, should review the proposed 
change concurrently for adequacy and compliance (see 30.202-7); and
    (ii) When the description of the change is both adequate and 
compliant, must notify the contractor in writing; and when the cost 
impact is--
    (A) Material, the CFAO must--
    (1) Request that the contractor submit, by a specified date, a 
general dollar magnitude (GDM) proposal; and
    (2) Attempt to use the contractor's GDM proposal to the maximum 
extent possible to negotiate and resolve the cost impact;
    (B) Immaterial, the CFAO must--
    (1) Inform the contractor in writing that if the noncompliance is 
not corrected, the Government reserves the right to make appropriate 
contract adjustments should the noncompliance become material in the 
future; and
    (2) Conclude the cost-impact process with no contract adjustments.
    (d) General dollar magnitude (GDM) proposal. The GDM proposal 
must--
    (1) Include a sufficient number of individual contract and/or 
subcontract cost-impact estimates, by contract number and agency, to 
support the GDM estimate (including identification of the individual 
contracts with the largest dollar impact);
    (2) Include by contract type an ``All Other'' category to reflect 
the total cost impact for those contracts not separately identified by 
the contractor in paragraph (d)(1) of this section;
    (3) Provide a computation of the cost impact as follows:
    (i) For cost-estimating noncompliances, the impact is the 
difference between--
    (A) The negotiated contract cost or price; and
    (B) What the negotiated contract cost or price would have been had 
the contractor used a compliant practice.
    (ii) For cost-accumulation noncompliances, the impact is the 
difference between--
    (A) The costs that were accumulated under the noncompliant 
practice; and
    (B) The costs that would have been accumulated if the compliant 
practice had been applied (from the time the noncompliant practice was 
first applied until the date the noncompliant practice was replaced 
with a compliant practice).
    (4) Group the CAS-covered contracts by contract type, limited to 
the following contract types:
    (i) Firm-fixed-price.
    (ii) Time-and-materials.
    (iii) Incentive-type (e.g., fixed-price incentive and cost-plus-
incentive-fee).
    (iv) Cost-reimbursement other than incentive-type (e.g., cost-plus-
fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee);
    (5) Include the total overpayments made by the Government during 
the period of noncompliance so that the CFAO can calculate and recover 
the proper interest amount; and
    (6) Recommend specific contract adjustments to settle the cost 
impact resulting from the noncompliance.
    (e) CFAO evaluation. The CFAO must promptly evaluate the GDM 
proposal. If the cost impact is--
    (1) Material, the CFAO must--
    (i) Negotiate and resolve the cost impact (see 30.606);
    (ii) Request the contractor submit, by a specified date, a revised 
GDM proposal with specific additional individual contract data (e.g., 
contracts with a dollar impact exceeding a specific dollar amount); or
    (iii) Request a detailed cost-impact (DCI) proposal if the CFAO 
determines that the GDM proposal cannot be adequately supported or does 
not contain sufficient data to resolve the cost impact. The CFAO must 
indicate in the written request to the contractor that the DCI proposal 
must include all contracts and subcontracts having a contract value 
exceeding a specified amount, established by the CFAO. The specified 
amount must be high enough so that the DCI proposal does not contain an 
excessive number of contracts and subcontracts but results in the 
proposal recognizing a reasonably high dollar percentage of the 
contracts impacted by the noncompliance.
    (2) When the cost impact is immaterial, the CFAO must--
    (i) Inform the contractor in writing that if the noncompliance is 
not corrected, the Government reserves the right to make appropriate 
contract adjustments should the noncompliance become material in the 
future; and
    (ii) Conclude the cost-impact process with no contract adjustments.
    (f) Detailed cost-impact (DCI) proposal. The DCI proposal must--
    (1) Measure the magnitude of the impact of the noncompliance on 
CAS-covered contracts and subcontracts subject to adjustment;
    (2) Include all contracts and subcontracts having a contract value 
exceeding a specified amount established by the CFAO;
    (3) Include by contract type an ``All Other'' category to reflect 
the total cost impact for those contracts that do not exceed the 
specified amount; and
    (4) Group the CAS-covered contracts by contract type, limited to 
the following contract types:
    (i) Firm-fixed-price.
    (ii) Time-and-materials.
    (iii) Incentive-type (e.g., fixed-price incentive and cost-plus-
incentive-fee).
    (iv) Cost-reimbursement other than incentive-type (e.g., cost-plus-
fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee).
    (g) Contract adjustments. The CFAO must--
    (1) Follow the procedures at 30.604(f); and
    (2) In accordance with the clause at 52.230-2, Cost Accounting 
Standards, or 52.230-5, Cost Accounting Standards--Educational 
Institution--
    (i) Include and separately identify, as part of the computation of 
the contract price adjustment(s), applicable interest on any increased 
cost paid to the contractor as a result of the noncompliance;
    (ii) Compute interest from the date of overpayment to the time the 
adjustment is effected in accordance with 26 U.S.C. 6621(a)(2), as 
follows:
    (A) If the costs were incurred and paid evenly over the fiscal 
years during which the noncompliance occurred, use the midpoint of the 
period in which the noncompliance began as the baseline for the 
computation of interest.
    (B) If the costs were not incurred and paid evenly over the fiscal 
years during which the noncompliance occurred, use an alternate method.
    (h) Remedies. If the contractor does not submit the required cost-
impact proposal, the CFAO must follow the procedures at 30.604(h).


30.606  Resolving cost impacts.

    (a) General. (1) The CFAO may resolve a cost impact attributed to a 
change in cost accounting practice or a noncompliance by adjusting a 
single contract, several but not all contracts, all contracts, or any 
other suitable method;
    (2) The CFAO must choose a method to resolve the cost impact that 
approximates the amount, in the aggregate, that would have resulted if 
individual contracts had been adjusted; and
    (3) Where there is a voluntary change (other than a change that the 
CFAO has determined to be desirable) or a noncompliance, the CFAO must 
not agree to a method that results in the payment of increased costs, 
in the aggregate, by the Government.
    (b) Adjusting contracts. The CFAO may adjust some or all contracts 
with a material cost impact. When the adjustments are made to reflect 
increased costs associated with cost-reimbursement contracts, the CFAO

[[Page 20859]]

must prevent payment of the increased costs through a cost 
disallowance.
    (c) Alternate methods. (1) The CFAO may use an alternate method 
instead of adjusting contracts to resolve the cost impact, provided the 
Government will not pay more, in the aggregate, than would be paid if 
the CFAO did not use the alternate method;
    (2) The CFAO may not use an alternate method when the alternate 
method would result in--
    (i) An under-recovery of monies by the Government (e.g., due to 
cost overruns);
    (ii) An inappropriate increase in profit on contracts beyond the 
level negotiated; or
    (iii) Distortions of incentive provisions and relationships between 
target costs, ceiling costs, and actual costs for incentive-type 
contracts.
    (3) When using an alternate method that excludes the costs from an 
indirect cost pool, the CFAO must--
    (i) Make such exclusion only for contractor fiscal years that have 
ended; and
    (ii) Adjust the exclusion to reflect the Government participation 
rate for cost-reimbursement contracts. For example, if there are 
increased costs to the Government of $100,000, and the indirect cost 
pool where the adjustment is to be affected has a Government 
participation rate of 50 percent for cost-reimbursement contracts, the 
contractor must exclude $200,000 from the indirect cost pool ($100,000/
50% = $200,000).
    (d) Offsets. (1) The CFAO may offset increased costs to the 
Government against decreased costs to the Government for some or all 
contracts, depending upon the particular facts and circumstances.
    (2) The CFAO must not use the offset process if it would result in 
the Government paying more, in the aggregate, than would be paid had 
the offset process not been used.
    (3) In determining what contracts should be offset, the CFAO must 
consider the following:
    (i) For any offsets that include incentive contracts, the CFAO must 
assure that the impact on the incentive provisions are not materially 
different from what would be obtained if individual contracts were 
adjusted.
    (ii) Within a segment, the CFAO may combine the effect of several 
changes in accounting practice in the offset consideration if the 
changes have the same effective date.
    (iii) The CFAO may offset cost increases at one segment of a 
company by decreases at another segment if the accounting change 
results in costs flowing between those segments. The CFAO responsible 
for the organizational level that directed the change should administer 
such offsets.
    (iv) When the result of the offset process is net increased costs, 
and the decision is to adjust a cost-reimbursement contract(s), the 
CFAO must prevent payment of the net increased costs through a cost 
disallowance.
    (e) Contract profit or fee. (1) The CFAO must adjust profit or fee 
whenever specifically provided for by law or the terms of the contract.
    (2) The CFAO should make any necessary adjustment to assure that 
the Government pays no more profit or fee, in the aggregate, than would 
have been paid had the change or noncompliance not occurred, unless 
such action is otherwise precluded by law or the terms of the contract.
    (f) Coordination. When resolving cost impacts, the CFAO must 
coordinate with the affected contracting officers (see 30.604(f)) 
before determining the method of resolution (i.e., adjust contracts, 
apply an alternate method, use the offset process). However, the CFAO 
has the sole authority for that determination.


30.607  Subcontract administration.

    When a negotiated CAS price adjustment or a determination of 
noncompliance is required at the subcontract level, the CFAO of the 
subcontractor must make the determination and furnish a copy of the 
negotiation memorandum to the affected CFAO(s) of the contractor or 
next higher-tier subcontractor, as appropriate. The CFAO(s) of higher-
tier subcontractors or contractors must not reverse the determination 
of the CFAO of the subcontractor.

PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

    7. Revise section 52.230-6 to read as follows:


52.230-6  Administration of Cost Accounting Standards.

    As prescribed in 30.201-4(d)(1), insert the following clause:

Administration of Cost Accounting Standards (Date)

    For the purpose of administering the Cost Accounting Standards 
(CAS) requirements under this contract, the Contractor shall take 
the steps outlined in paragraphs (a) through (c) and (e) through (h) 
of this clause:
    (a) Submit to the Cognizant Federal Agency Official (CFAO) a 
description of any cost accounting practice change as outlined in 
paragraphs (a)(1) through (3). If a Contractor implements any change 
in cost accounting practice without submitting the notice required 
by this paragraph, the change will be a failure to follow paragraph 
(a)(4) of the clause at FAR 52.230-3, Disclosure and Consistency of 
Cost Accounting Practices.
    (1) For any change in cost accounting practices required in 
accordance with paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4)(i) of the clause at FAR 
52.230-2, Cost Accounting Standards, or paragraphs (a)(3), 
(a)(4)(i), or (a)(4)(iv) of the clause at FAR 52.230-5, Cost 
Accounting Standards--Educational Institution, submit a description 
of the change within 60 days (or such other date as may be mutually 
agreed to by the CFAO and the Contractor) after award of a contract 
requiring this change.
    (2) For any change in cost accounting practices proposed in 
accordance with paragraphs (a)(4)(ii) or (iii) of the clauses at FAR 
52.230-2, Cost Accounting Standards, and FAR 52.230-5, Cost 
Accounting Standards--Educational Institution, or with paragraph 
(a)(3) of the clause at FAR 52.230-3, Disclosure and Consistency of 
Cost Accounting Practices, submit a description of the change not 
less than 60 days (or such other date as may be mutually agreed to) 
before the effective date of the proposed change. If the change 
includes a proposed retroactive applicability date (e.g., to the 
beginning of the current Contractor fiscal year in which the 
notification is made), submit rationale supporting the proposed 
retroactive applicability date.
    (3) Submit a description of the change necessary to correct a 
failure to comply with an applicable CAS or to follow a disclosed 
practice (as contemplated by paragraph (a)(5) at FAR 52.230-2, Cost 
Accounting Standards, and FAR 52.230-5, Cost Accounting Standards--
Educational Institution; or by paragraph (a)(4) at FAR 52.230-3, 
Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting Practices)--
    (i) Within 60 days (or such other date as may be mutually agreed 
to) after the date of agreement with the initial finding of 
noncompliance; or
    (ii) In the event of Contractor disagreement with the initial 
finding of noncompliance, within 60 days of the date that the CFAO 
notifies the Contractor of the determination of noncompliance.
    (b) When requested by the CFAO, submit a general dollar 
magnitude (GDM) proposal on or before the date specified by the 
CFAO, or other mutually agreed to date.
    (1) For changes subject to paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this 
clause, the GDM proposal shall--
    (i) Include a sufficient number of individual contract and/or 
subcontract cost-impact estimates, by contract number and agency, to 
support the GDM estimate (including identification of the individual 
contracts with the largest dollar impact);
    (ii) Include by contract type an ``All Other'' category to 
reflect the total cost impact for those contracts not separately 
identified;
    (iii) Provide a computation of the cost impact based on the 
difference between the estimated costs to complete under the current 
practice and the estimated costs to complete under the revised 
practice;
    (iv) Provide a computation of the cost impact using a consistent 
cost baseline. A consistent cost baseline means that the

[[Page 20860]]

amounts before and after the change are not based on different 
scopes of contract efforts, levels of operation, methods of 
operation, or other information that is not related specifically to 
the cost accounting practice change. The cost impact shall be based 
on the revised forward pricing rates and current contract estimates 
to complete that incorporate the new cost accounting practice;
    (v) Group the CAS-covered contracts by contract type, limited to 
the following contract types:
    (A) Firm-fixed-price.
    (B) Time-and-materials.
    (C) Incentive-type (e.g., fixed-price incentive and cost-plus-
incentive-fee).
    (D) Cost-reimbursement other than incentive-type (e.g., cost-
plus-fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee); and
    (vi) Recommend specific contract adjustments to settle the cost 
impact of the cost accounting practice change.
    (2) For changes submitted pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this 
clause, the GDM proposal shall--
    (i) Include a sufficient number of individual contract and/or 
subcontract cost impact estimates, by contract number and agency, to 
support the GDM estimate (including identification of the individual 
contracts with the largest dollar impact);
    (ii) Include by contract type an ``All Other'' category to 
reflect the total cost impact for those contracts not separately 
identified;
    (iii) Provide a computation of the cost impact as follows:
    (A) For cost-estimating noncompliances, the impact is the 
difference between--
    (1) The negotiated contract cost or price; and
    (2) What the negotiated contract cost or price would have been 
had the Contractor used a compliant practice.
    (B) For cost-accumulation noncompliances, the impact is the 
difference between--
    (1) The costs that were accumulated under the noncompliant 
practice; and
    (2) The costs that would have been accumulated if the compliant 
practice had been applied (from the time the noncompliant practice 
was first applied until the date the noncompliant practice was 
replaced with a compliant practice);
    (iv) Group the CAS-covered contracts by contract type, limited 
to the following contract types:
    (A) Firm-fixed-price.
    (B) Time-and-materials.
    (C) Incentive-type (e.g., fixed-price incentive and cost-plus-
incentive-fee).
    (D) Cost-reimbursement other than incentive-type (e.g., cost-
plus-fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee);
    (v) Include the total overpayments made by the Government during 
the period of noncompliance so that the CFAO can calculate and 
recover the proper interest amount; and
    (vi) Recommend specific contract adjustments to settle the cost 
impact resulting from the noncompliance.
    (c) When requested by the CFAO, submit a detailed cost-impact 
(DCI) proposal on or before the date specified by the CFAO, or other 
mutually agreed to date. The DCI proposal shall--
    (1) Measure the magnitude of the impact of the change on CAS-
covered contracts and subcontracts subject to adjustment;
    (2) Include all contracts and subcontracts having an estimate to 
complete, based on the old accounting practice, exceeding a 
specified amount established by the CFAO;
    (3) Include by contract type an ``All Other'' category to 
reflect the total cost impact for those contracts that do not exceed 
the specified amount; and
    (4) Group the CAS-covered contracts by contract type, limited to 
the following contract types:
    (i) Firm-fixed-price.
    (ii) Time-and-materials.
    (iii) Incentive-type (e.g., fixed-price incentive and cost-plus-
incentive-fee).
    (iv) Cost-reimbursement other than incentive-type (e.g., cost-
plus-fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee).
    (d) If the Contractor does not submit the information required 
by paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this clause within the specified 
time, or any extension granted by the CFAO, the CFAO may--
    (1) Withhold an amount not to exceed 10 percent of each 
subsequent amount payment to the Contractor's CAS-covered contracts, 
up to the estimated general dollar magnitude of the cost impact, 
until such time as the Contractor provides the required information 
to the CFAO; and
    (2) Unilaterally adjust the contract(s).
    (e) Agree to appropriate contract and subcontract amendments to 
reflect adjustments established in accordance with paragraphs (a)(4) 
and (a)(5) of the clauses at FAR 52.230-2 and 52.230-5; or with 
paragraph (a)(3) or paragraph (a)(4) of the Disclosure and 
Consistency of Cost Accounting Practices clause at FAR 52.230-3.
    (f) For all subcontracts subject to the clauses at FAR 52.230-2, 
52.230-3, or 52.230-5--
    (1) So state in the body of the subcontract, in the letter of 
award, or in both (do not use self-deleting clauses);
    (2) Include the substance of this clause in all negotiated 
subcontracts; and
    (3) Within 30 days after award of the subcontract, submit the 
following information to the Contractor's cognizant contract 
administration office for transmittal to the contract administration 
office cognizant of the subcontractor's facility:
    (i) Subcontractor's name and subcontract number.
    (ii) Dollar amount and date of award.
    (iii) Name of Contractor making the award.
    (g) Notify the Contracting Officer in writing of any adjustments 
required to subcontracts under this contract and agree to an 
adjustment, based on them, to this contract price or estimated cost 
and fee. The Contractor shall--
    (1) Provide this notice within 30 days after the Contractor 
receives the proposed subcontract adjustments; and
    (2) Include a proposal for adjusting the higher-tier subcontract 
or the contract appropriately.
    (h) For subcontracts containing the clause at FAR 52.230-2 or 
FAR 52.230-5, require the subcontractor to comply with all standards 
in effect on the date of award or of final agreement on price, as 
shown on the subcontractor's signed Certificate of Current Cost or 
Pricing Data, whichever is earlier. (End of clause)
[FR Doc. 00-9206 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P