[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 22, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15240-15244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-6972]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 224-0213a; FRL-6549-7]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California 
State Implementation Plan Revision, Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution 
Control District, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control 
District, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, South 
Coast Air Quality Air Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the 
California State Implementation Plan. The revisions concern rules from 
the following districts: Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control 
District, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, and South Coast 
Air Quality Air Management District. This approval action will 
incorporate these rules into the federally approved SIP. The intended 
effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of volatile 
organic compounds (VOCs) according to the requirements of the Clean Air 
Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). The revised rules control VOC 
emissions from the coating of wood products and wood flat stock. Thus, 
EPA is finalizing the approval of these

[[Page 15241]]

revisions into the California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding 
EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary 
ambient air quality standards and plan requirements for nonattainment 
areas.

DATES: This rule is effective on May 22, 2000 without further notice, 
unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 21, 2000. If EPA receives 
such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal Federal Register 
informing the public that this rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments must be submitted to Andrew Steckel at the 
Region IX office listed below. Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's 
evaluation report for each rule are available for public inspection at 
EPA's Region IX office during normal business hours. Copies of the 
submitted rule revisions are available for inspection at the following 
locations:

Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105;
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street, 
SW., Washington, D.C. 20460;
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812;
Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, 24580 Silver Cloud 
Court, Monterey, CA 93940;
San Joaquin Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1999 Tuolumne 
Street, Suite 200, Fresno, CA 93721;
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 26 Castilian Drive, 
Suite B-23, Goleta, CA 93117; and,
South Coast Air Quality Management District, 218 East Copley Drive, 
Diamond Bar, CA 91765.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerald S. Wamsley, Rulemaking Office, 
AIR-4, Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744-
1226.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Applicability

    The rules being approved into the California SIP include: Monterey 
Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District (MBUAPCD) Rule 429--
Applications of Nonarchitectural Coatings; San Joaquin Valley Unified 
Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) Rule 4606--Wood Products 
Coating Operations; Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 
(SBCAPCD) Rule 351--Surface Coating of Wood Products; South Coast Air 
Quality Management District(SCAQMD) Rule 1104--Wood Flat Stock Coating 
Operations. These rules were submitted by the California Air Resources 
Board (CARB) to EPA on these respective dates: March 23, 1988; February 
16, 1999; May 13, 1999; and, October 29, 1999.

II. Background

    On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment 
areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 
(1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the Monterey Bay, San 
Joaquin Valley, Santa Barbara County, and the South Coast air basin. 43 
FR 8964, 40 CFR 81.305. On May 26, 1988, EPA notified the Governor of 
California, pursuant to section 110(a)(2)(H) of the 1977 Act, that the 
above districts' portions of the California SIP were inadequate to 
attain and maintain the ozone standard and requested that deficiencies 
in the existing SIP be corrected (EPA's SIP-Call). On November 15, 
1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Public Law 
101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. In amended 
section 182(a)(2)(A) of the CAA, Congress statutorily adopted the 
requirement that nonattainment areas fix their deficient reasonably 
available control technology (RACT) rules for ozone and established a 
deadline of May 15, 1991 for states to submit corrections of those 
deficiencies.
    Section 182(a)(2)(A) applies to areas designated as nonattainment 
prior to enactment of the amendments and classified as marginal or 
above as of the date of enactment. It requires such areas to adopt and 
correct RACT rules pursuant to pre-amended section 172(b) as 
interpreted in pre-amendment guidance.\1\ EPA's SIP-Call used that 
guidance to indicate the necessary corrections for specific 
nonattainment areas. The nonattainment areas subject to this rulemaking 
were classified as follows: Monterey Bay--moderate; San Joaquin Valley 
and Santa Barbara--serious; and South Coast--extreme.\2\ Therefore, 
these areas are subject to the RACT fix-up requirement and the May 15, 
1991 deadline. The Monterey Bay Area was redesignated as an attainment 
area for the ozone standard on January 17, 1997 (see 62 FR 2597.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of 
those portions of the proposed Post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide 
policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); ``Issues 
Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, 
Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register 
document'' (Blue Book) (notice of availability was published in the 
Federal Register on May 25, 1988); and the existing control 
technique guidelines (CTGs).
    \2\ The Monterey Bay, San Joaquin Valley, Santa Barbara County 
and South Coast nonattainment areas retained their designation of 
nonattainment and were classified by operation of law pursuant to 
sections 107(d) and 181(a) upon the date of enactment of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Along with many other revised RACT rules, the State of California 
submitted the rules being acted on in this document for incorporation 
into its SIP on the following dates: March 23, 1988 (MBUAPCD Rule 429); 
February 16, 1999 (SJVUAPCD Rule 4606); May 13, 1999 (SBCAPCD Rule 
351); and October 29, 1999 (SCAQMD Rule 1104.) MBUAPCD adopted Rule 429 
on September 16, 1987, prior to EPA's promulgation of its completeness 
criteria for SIP submittals. SJVUAPCD adopted Rule 4606 on December 17, 
1998. SBCAPCD adopted Rule 351 on August 20, 1998. SCAQMD adopted Rule 
1104 on August 13, 1999. These submitted rules were found to be 
complete on April 23, 1999 (SJVUAPCD Rule 4606), June 10, 1999 (SBCAPCD 
Rule 351), and December 16, 1999 (SCAQMD Rule 1104), pursuant to EPA's 
completeness criteria that are set forth in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V 
\3\ and are being finalized for approval into the SIP. This document 
addresses EPA's direct-final action for MBUAPCD Rule 429--Applications 
of Nonarchitectural Coatings; SJVUAPCD Rule 4606--Wood Products Coating 
Operations; SBCAPCD Rule 351--Surface Coating of Wood Products; SCAQMD 
Rule 1104--Wood Flat Stock Coating Operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990 
(55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA, 
revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SJVUAPCD Rule 4606, SBCAPCD Rule 351, and SCAQMD Rule 1104 regulate 
the VOC content of various coatings applied to wood products such as 
furniture, cabinets, and interior and exterior wood paneling. VOCs 
contribute to the production of ground level ozone and smog. MBUAPCD 
Rule 429 regulates spray gun work practices. These rules were adopted 
originally as part of each air district's effort to achieve the 
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone and in response 
to EPA's SIP-Call and the section 182(a)(2)(A) CAA requirement. EPA's 
evaluation and final action for these four rules follow below.

III. EPA Evaluation and Action

    In determining the approvability of a VOC rule, EPA must evaluate 
the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA 
regulations, as found in section 110 and part D of the CAA and 40 CFR 
part 51 (Requirements for

[[Page 15242]]

Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans). The EPA 
interpretation of these requirements, which forms the basis for today's 
action, appears in the various EPA policy guidance documents listed in 
footnote one. Among those provisions is the requirement that a VOC rule 
must, at a minimum, provide for the implementation of RACT for 
stationary sources of VOC emissions. This requirement was carried forth 
from the pre-amended Act.
    For the purpose of assisting state and local agencies in developing 
RACT rules, EPA prepared a series of Control Technique Guideline (CTG) 
documents. The CTGs are based on the underlying requirements of the Act 
and specify the presumptive norms for what is RACT for specific source 
categories. Under the CAA, Congress ratified EPA's use of these 
documents, as well as other Agency policy, for requiring States to 
``fix-up'' their RACT rules. See section 182(a)(2)(A). The CTG 
applicable to SJVUAPCD Rule 4606 and SBCAPCD Rule 351 is the following: 
``Guideline Series: Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from 
Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations,'' USEPA, April, 1996. The CTG 
applicable to SCAQMD Rule 1104 is the following: ``Guideline Series: 
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Existing Stationary 
Sources Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of Flatwood Panelling;'' 
USEPA, June 1978; EPA-450/2-78-032.
    Further interpretations of EPA policy are found in the Blue Book, 
referred to in footnote one. In general, these guidance documents have 
been set forth to ensure that VOC rules are fully enforceable and 
strengthen or maintain the SIP. Each of the subject rules within this 
action will now be reviewed briefly.
    There is no version of MBUAPCD Rule 429--Applications of 
Nonarchitectural Coatings in the SIP. The submitted rule includes the 
following provisions:

--Applicability;
--Definitions of terms used within the rule; and,
--Spray application requirements.

    EPA has evaluated the submitted MBUAPCD Rule 429 and has determined 
that it is consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. 
Therefore, MBUAPCD Rule 429--Applications of Nonarchitectural Coatings 
is being approved under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the 
requirements of section 110(a) and part D.
    There is no version of SJVUAPCD Rule 4606--Wood Products Coating 
Operations in the SIP. The submitted rule includes the following 
provisions:
--A statement of purpose;
--Applicability;
--Definitions of terms used within the rule;
--Exemptions from the rule;
--Requirements concerning VOC (volatile organic compounds) content of 
coatings, application equipment, prohibition of specification, and 
storage of ROC containing materials;
--Recordkeeping to demonstrate compliance with the rule;
--Test methods for determining compliance with the rule; and,
--Compliance schedules.

    EPA has evaluated the submitted SJVUAPCD Rule 4606 and has 
determined that it is consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA 
policy. Therefore, SJVUAPCD Rule 4606--Wood Products Coating Operations 
is being approved under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the 
requirements of section 110(a) and part D.
    There is no version of SBCAPCD Rule 351--Surface Coating of Wood 
Products in the SIP. The submitted rule includes the following 
provisions:

--Applicability;
--Exemptions from the rule;
--Definitions of terms used within the rule;
--Requirements concerning ROC (reactive organic compounds) content of 
coatings, transfer efficiency, prohibition of specification, and 
storage of ROC containing materials;
--Test methods for determining compliance with the rule; and,
--Recordkeeping to demonstrate compliance with the rule.

    EPA has evaluated the submitted rule and has determined that it is 
consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. Therefore, 
SBCAPCD Rule 351--Surface Coating of Wood Products is being approved 
under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the requirements of 
section 110(a) and part D.
    On June 23, 1994 (see 59 FR 32354), EPA approved into the SIP a 
version of Rule SCAQMD Rule 1104--Wood Flat Stock Coating Operations 
adopted by the SCAQMD on March 1, 1991. SCAQMD's submitted Rule 1104 
includes the following significant changes from the current SIP-
approved rule:

--The allowable VOC content for inks is reduced from 300 grams/liter 
(gr/l) to 250 gr/l;
--The allowable VOC content for exterior siding coatings is reduced 
from 300 gr/l to 250 gr/l; and,
--The exempt compounds and volatile organic compound definitions were 
deleted and SCAQMD Rule 102--Definitions is referenced in their place.

    The modified VOC content limits within submitted Rule 1104 do not 
interfere with reasonable further progress or attainment of the NAAQS, 
because the VOC content limits have been lowered. The changes to Rule 
1104 increase VOC emission reductions compared to the 1991 version of 
the rule within the SIP. SCAQMD calculated that VOC emissions are 
reduced by an additional 7.9 pounds per day. For these reasons, the 
changes within submitted Rule 1104 are consistent with the requirements 
of section 110(l) of the CAA.
    EPA has evaluated the submitted SCAQMD Rule 1104 and has determined 
that it is consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. 
Therefore, SCAQMD Rule 1104--Wood Flat Stock Coating Operations is 
being approved under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the 
requirements of section 110(a) and part D.
    EPA is publishing this rulemaking without prior proposal because 
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates 
no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this 
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should 
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective May 22, 2000 
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by 
April 21, 2000.
    If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule 
will not take effect. All public comments received will then be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The 
EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested 
in commenting on this rule should do so at this time. If no such 
comments are received, the public is advised that this rule is 
effective on May 22, 2000 and no further action will be taken on the 
proposed rule.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory 
Planning and Review.''

B. Executive Order 13132

    Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) revokes and replaces 
Executive

[[Page 15243]]

Orders 12612, Federalism and 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental 
Partnership. Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an 
accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State 
and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have 
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism 
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a 
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless 
the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct 
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA 
consults with State and local officials early in the process of 
developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation 
that has federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the 
Agency consults with State and local officials early in the process of 
developing the proposed regulation.
    This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule 
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean 
Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do 
not apply to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13045

    Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) Is 
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under 
Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or 
safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate 
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the 
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the 
planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is 
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible 
alternatives considered by the Agency.
    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does 
not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or 
safety risks.

D. Executive Order 13084

    Under Executive Order 13084, Consultation and Coordination with 
Indian Tribal Governments, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the 
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is unfunded, 
EPA must provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a 
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a 
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with 
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature 
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the 
regulation.
    In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop an 
effective process permitting elected and other representatives of 
Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in 
the development of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or 
uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule does not 
significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal 
governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of Executive 
Order 13084 do not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies 
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small 
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental 
jurisdictions.
    This final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial 
number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and 
subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new 
requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already 
imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create 
any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under 
the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute 
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

    Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; 
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA 
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
    EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of 
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves 
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new 
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or 
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule

[[Page 15244]]

cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This rule is not a ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

H. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act 
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing 
technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with 
NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards'' 
(VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies 
unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise 
impractical.
    The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's 
action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to 
the use of VCS.

I. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 22, 2000. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 15, 2000.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(176)(i)(D), 
(c)(262)(i)(D), (c)(263)(i)(B)(2), and (c)(270)(i)(c)(2) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (176) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 429 adopted on September 16, 1987.
* * * * *
    (262) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 4606 adopted on December 19, 1991 and amended on December 
17, 1998.
* * * * *
    (263) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (2) Rule 351 adopted on August 24, 1993 and amended on August 20, 
1998.
* * * * *
    (270) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (2) Rule 1104 adopted on April 7, 1978 and amended on August 13, 
1999.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 00-6972 Filed 3-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P