[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 22, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15290-15297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-6353]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration

49 CFR Parts 190, 191, 192, and 195

[Docket No. RSPA-99-6106]
RIN 2137-AD35


Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates to Pipeline Safety Regulations 
(1999)

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule is part of a periodic effort by RSPA to 
revise and update the pipeline safety regulations to improve clarity, 
ensure consistency, and remove unnecessary requirements on the 
regulated pipeline community. Revisions include incorporation by 
reference of the most recent editions of voluntary consensus standards 
and specifications to enable pipeline operators to utilize current 
technology, materials, and practices. This document also proposes to 
increase the pressure limitation for new thermoplastic pipe, to allow 
plastic pipe on bridges, to clarify welding requirements, to revise the 
definition of hazardous liquid pipeline accident, and to make numerous 
minor clarifications.

DATES: Comments on the subject of this proposed rule must be received 
on or before May 22, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. RSPA-99-6106, and be 
mailed to the Dockets Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You 
should submit the original and one copy. If you wish to receive 
confirmation of receipt of your comments, you must include a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard. The Dockets Facility is open from 10:00 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays. The 
public may also submit or review comments in this docket by accessing 
the Dockets Management System's home page at http://dms.dot.gov. An 
electronic copy of any rulemaking document or comment may be downloaded 
from the OPS home page at http://ops.dot.gov or from the Government 
Printing Office

[[Page 15291]]

Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202) 512-1661.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard D. Huriaux by telephone at 
(202) 366-4565, by fax at (202) 366-4566, by e-mail at 
[email protected], or by mail at U.S. Department of 
Transportation, RSPA/Office of Pipeline Safety, Room 7128, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Copies of this document or other 
material in the docket can be reviewed by accessing the Docket 
Management System's home page at http://dms.dot.gov. General 
information on the pipeline safety program is available at the Office 
of Pipeline Safety web site at http://ops.dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This rulemaking is a periodic update of the pipeline safety 
regulations to ensure that the pipeline safety regulations incorporate 
the most current technical standards and specifications, to improve 
clarity, consistency, and accuracy, and to reduce unnecessary burdens 
on the regulated community.
    In a March 1995 memorandum, President Clinton directed Federal 
regulatory agencies to, among other things, conduct a page-by-page 
review of all agency regulations, cutting or revising those that were 
obsolete, intrusive, or better handled by parties other than the 
Federal government (i.e., private business, State, or local 
government). In response to the President's directive, RSPA issued a 
final rule on May 24, 1996 (61 FR 26121) that updated references to 
voluntary specifications and standards. Subsequently, RSPA issued 
another periodic update on February 17, 1998, to incorporate by 
reference the latest editions of voluntary consensus standards and to 
make corrections and clarifications. RSPA intends to issue future 
periodic updates to ensure that the pipeline safety regulations reflect 
current practice and to improve compliance by the pipeline industry 
with safety standards.

Standards Incorporated by Reference

    The ``National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995'' 
(Public Law 104-113) directs Federal agencies to use voluntary 
consensus standards in lieu of government-written standards whenever 
possible. Voluntary consensus standards are standards developed or 
adopted by voluntary bodies that develop, establish, or coordinate 
technical standards using agreed-upon procedures.
    RSPA's Office of Pipeline safety participates in more than 25 
national voluntary consensus standards committees. RPSA's policy is to 
adopt voluntary consensus standards when they are applicable. In recent 
years, RSPA has adopted dozens of voluntary consensus standards into 
its gas pipeline, hazardous liquid pipeline, and liquefied natural gas 
(LNG) regulations. RSPA has not adopted a government-written standard 
in lieu of a voluntary consensus standard and does not plan to do so in 
the future.
    RSPA has reviewed the voluntary consensus standards currently 
referred to in the pipeline safety regulations and in its appendices, 
and proposes to adopt the latest editions of the standards that are 
incorporated by reference in 49 CFR Parts 192 and 195. The 
organizations responsible for producing these standards often update or 
revise them to incorporate the most current technology.
    Parts 192 and 195 incorporate by reference all or portions of over 
60 standards and specifications developed and published by technical 
organizations, including the American Petroleum Institute, American Gas 
Association, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society 
for Testing and Materials, Manufacturers Standardization Society of the 
Valve and Fittings Industry, National Fire Protection Association, and 
Plastics Pipe Institute. The most recent editions of these documents 
represent a consensus on the best current practice and modern 
technology in the pipeline industry.
    OPS proposes to adopt the most recent editions of the standards 
into the pipeline safety regulations. These are set forth by name and 
date in the proposed amendments to appendices A and B of Part 192 and 
Sec. 195.3 of Part 195. The order and appearance in the CFR of the 
consensus standards has also been updated and clarified. In general, 
the only substantive change is reference the new edition and year of 
publication.
    One entirely new standard is proposed for incorporation by 
reference in the gas pipeline safety regulations. We propose to adopt 
the Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc.'s technical recommendation, 
``Policies and Procedures for Developing Hydrostatic Design Bases 
(HDB), Pressure Design Bases (PDB), and Minimum Required Strength (MRS) 
Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping Materials'' (PPI TR-3/2000). This 
standard would be referenced in the gas pipeline safety regulations at 
Sec. 192.121, Design of plastic pipe. It will provide a method for 
determining hydrostatic design basis (HDB) for pipelines operating at 
any operating temperature by using the arithmetic interpolation 
procedure in Part E, Policy for determining long term strength (LTHS) 
by temperature interpolation, of PPI TR-3/2000. This will provide gas 
distribution pipeline operators with the flexibility to design safe 
plastic pipeline systems at any operating temperature.
    In addition, RSPA proposes to update the addresses for each of the 
standards' organizations, to correct the numbering system, and to edit 
for clarity and typographical errors.

Petition to Limit Pressure of Thermoplastic Gas Pipe to a Maximum of 
125 p.s.i.g.

    On December 10, 1998 and November 23, 1999, the American Gas 
Association (AGA) petitioned RSPA to amend Sec. 192.123 to allow the 
design pressure for thermoplastic pipe to be determined by its 
dimensions and the material's long-term strength as represented by the 
HDB in accordance with Sec. 192.121 and to be limited to a maximum of 
862 kPa (125 p.s.i.g.) instead of the current limitation of 689 kPa 
(100 p.s.i.g.). AGA stated that this increase in the pressure 
limitation for thermoplastic pipe used in gas distribution systems is 
clearly supported by the proven performance of modern polyethylene pipe 
and the successful operation of pipe at greater than 100 p.s.i.g. under 
the authority of waivers granted by state pipeline regulators. Further, 
their position is supported by laboratory and field analysis of the 
long-term hydrostatic strength of these piping materials. Copies of the 
AGA petitions are included in the docket.
    This proposal would apply only to plastic pipe produced after the 
effective date of this rule. Existing pipes would continue to be 
limited to operation at the 689 kPa (100 p.s.i.g.). RSPA proposes to 
increase the pressure limitation for thermoplastic pipe to 862 kPa (125 
p.s.i.g.).

Petition for Rule Change to Allow the Installation of Plastic Gas Pipe 
on Bridges

    In 1993, the Gas Piping Technology Committee (GPTC) petitioned RSPA 
to allow the installation of plastic pipe on bridges. GPTC is 
designated as an American National Standards Institute standards 
committee for the purpose of developing and publishing the ``Guide for 
Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems'', to assist natural 
gas pipeline operators in efforts to comply with Part 192, to comment 
on proposed amendments to Part 192, and to propose amendments to Part 
192. RSPA's Office

[[Page 15292]]

of Pipeline Safety is represented on this committee.
    GPTC requested that Sec. 192.321 be amended to allow the use of 
plastic pipe on bridges provided that the plastic pipe is:
    (1) Protected from mechanical damage, such as by installation in a 
metallic casing.
    (2) Installed so that the temperature of the pipe will not exceed 
the limits specified in Sec. 192.321.
    (3) Protected from ultraviolet radiation.
    In support of its petition the GPTC provided a technical report on 
Installation of Plastic Gas Pipeline Across Bridges, which is available 
in this docket.
    Since 1993, RSPA has granted a number of waivers incorporating the 
GPTC conditions for installation of plastic pipe across bridges. There 
is no record of failure of plastic pipe that has been installed under 
these waivers. In addition, continued progress in the design, 
manufacture, and installation of plastic pipe have rendered it ever 
more fit for broad application in gas pipeline systems.
    RSPA proposes to revise Sec. 192.321 to allow the routine 
installation of plastic pipe on bridges subject to the conditions 
suggested by GPTC.

Confirmation or Revision of MAOP After a Change in Class Location

    Section 192.611(d) allows 18 months for a gas pipeline operator to 
confirm or revise the maximum allowable operating pressure of a 
pipeline after a change in Class Location. A change is Class Location 
occurs when new buildings along a pipeline are ready for occupancy, not 
when the operator discovers that there are new buildings or completes 
its review. The time it takes for the operator to determine that the 
area has changed its Class Location and the time it takes to obtain the 
required environmental and land-use permits to complete the pressure 
testing to confirm a new MAOP may exhaust the current 18 month 
allowance. In addition, the internal budget process of the pipeline 
operators may cause further delay.
    In light of these constraints on operators and the fact that there 
have been no pressure-related failures following class location 
changes, we propose to increase the allowable time to confirm or revise 
MAOP after a Class Location change from 18 months to 24 months.

Updates in Response to Recommendations on Welding in the SIRRC Report

    In October 1997 the National Association of Pipeline Safety 
Representatives (NAPSR), the American Public Gas Association (APGA), 
and the American Gas Association (AGA) formed the State Industry 
Regulatory Review Committee (SIRRC), to discuss differences of opinion 
on NAPSR's proposed gas pipeline safety rule changes in Docket No. PS-
124. AGA and APGA had proposed to coordinate discussions between the 
industry and NAPSR in an attempt to resolve those differences, as well 
as other items of mutual interest. NAPSR welcomed the opportunity to 
work with the industry, and passed a resolution in May of 1997 
authorizing the NAPSR Liaison Committee to work with the industry 
representatives on these issues. The committee held four formal 
meetings on this initiative. At each meeting, the proposed PS-124 
recommendations were discussed in-depth to ensure that representatives 
on both sides understood the issues from each of their perspectives. 
Members of the SIRRC agreed on many of the issues in the proposal (or 
subsequent modifications to the proposal), and agreed to disagree with 
some of the proposals. A copy of the SIRRC Summary Report (April 26, 
1999) is available in this docket.
    Although all 39 recommendations in the SIRRC report will be 
addressed in a subsequent rulemaking in Docket No. PS-124, several of 
the welding recommendations appear to be noncontroversial and will be 
dealt with in this periodic update docket. Specifically, SIRRC reached 
a consensus that Sec. 192.255(a) should be amended to specify that 
welders must be qualified under ``welding procedures qualified under 
American Petroleum Institute (API), American Society of Mechanical 
Engineers (ASME), or other accepted pipeline welding standards.'' RSPA 
agrees that the specific references to the two widely accepted pipeline 
industry welding standards will make clear that operators should be 
using accepted welding standards in pipeline construction and repair. 
However, we are not aware of any ``other accepted pipeline welding 
standards'' that could be relied on by an operator for pipeline 
welding. In addition, we believe a more specific citation to the API 
and ASME standards is appropriate.
    Therefore, RSPA proposes to amend Sec. 192.255(a) to read ``(a) 
Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each welder must 
be qualified in accordance with Section 6 of API 1104 or Section IX of 
the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. However, a welder qualified 
under an earlier edition than listed in Appendix A of this part may 
weld but may not requalify under that earlier edition.'' RSPA commits 
to updating these references to accepted welding standards in periodic 
updates of the regulations, including the inclusion of additional 
pipeline welding standards as necessary.
    SIRRC also proposed that Sec. 192.241 be amended to make clear that 
visual inspection of welding must be conducted ``by an inspector 
qualified by appropriate training and experience.'' RSPA agrees and is 
proposing that this change be included in the pipeline safety rules.

Definition of Injury in Part 195

    The hazardous liquid pipeline safety regulations at Sec. 195.50 
require an accident report for any event that includes a release of 
hazardous liquid from a pipeline with:
    (1) An explosion or fire not intentionally set by the operator.
    (2) Loss of 50 or more barrels of hazardous liquid.
    (3) Escape to the atmosphere of more than 5 barrels a day of highly 
volatile liquids.
    (4) Death of any person.
    (5) Bodily harm to any person in one or more of the following:

--Loss of consciousness.
--Necessity to carry the person from the scene.
--Necessity for medical treatment.
--Disability which prevents the discharge of normal duties or the 
pursuit of normal activities beyond the day of the accident.

    This means that even the most minor injury during a pipeline event 
can result in the entire accident being reportable if the person 
receives any ``medical treatment''. The lack of a definition of medical 
treatment means that any kind of treatment, even a bandage applied at 
the scene or out-patient services received at a local clinic could make 
the accident reportable, even if it does not meet any of the other 
requirements for reportability.
    In contrast, the gas pipeline safety regulations define a 
reportable gas pipeline event as one that includes a release of gas 
from a pipeline with
    (1) A death or personal injury requiring in-patient 
hospitalization,
    (2) Estimated property damage of $50,000 or more, or
    (3) Any event that is significant in the judgment of the operator.
    For gas pipelines, an injury treated at the scene or at a local 
clinic would not

[[Page 15293]]

result in the incident being reportable, unless it meets one of the 
other requirements.
    RSPA proposes to eliminate the reporting criteria discrepancy 
between Parts 192 and 195 to ensure that accident reporting is uniform 
for both gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. The reporting language in 
Part 192 was adopted before the language in Part 195 and embodies the 
original intent relative to the injury criteria for reportability of 
pipeline accidents. We do not believe that this change would cause any 
reportable hazardous liquid pipeline accidents to become non-
reportable. For example, the 1994 San Jacinto River accident would 
still have been reportable based on product loss and property damage.
    Therefore, RSPA proposes to revise Sec. 195.50 by deleting the 
existing language in paragraph (e) and substituting the same language 
used for gas pipeline events, i.e., ``[a] personal injury necessitating 
in-patient hospitalization.''

Petition of the GPTC on Strength Test Requirements for Flanges

    In a November 27, 1996 letter the GPTC noted that most gas 
operators ``have assumed that flange manufacturers test a prototype as 
described in 192.505(d)(2).'' This turns out to be incorrect. Rather, 
most manufacturers meet the requirements by use of ASME/ANSI B16.5, 
B16.47, or MSS SP44, which contain standard pressure ratings. In 
addition, flange manufacturers have developed ratings of nonstandard 
flanges through unit stress calculations as described in Sec. 192.143.
    GPTC stated that each part of a pipeline must be able to stand the 
internal gas pressures and other mechanical loadings without impairment 
of serviceability with unit stresses equivalent to those allowed for 
comparable material in the pipe. If a design based on unit stresses is 
impractical for a particular pipeline component, GPTC suggests that 
design be based on a pressure rating established by pressure testing 
that component or a prototype of the component.
    To clarify this situation and ensure that flanges and other 
components of a pipeline system can safely contain anticipated 
pressures and loadings, GPTC urges that we add the following paragraph 
to 192.505(d): (3) Flanges and components carrying a pressure rating 
established through ASME/ANSI, MSS specification, or by unit strength 
calculations as described in 192.143, General Requirements, do not 
require a strength test.''
    The proposed language incorporates this language as a new paragraph 
Sec. 192.505(d)(3) to ensure that flanges and other components of 
pipeline systems can safely contain the pressures to which they are 
subjected in the course of pipeline operations.

Clarifications, Corrections, and Edits

    This document revises the pipeline safety regulations to correct 
language or clarify meaning in a number of sections, including:
    1. Sec. 190.11--The telephone number for Office of Pipeline Safety 
information and assistance would be changed to (202) 366-4431.
    2. Sec. 190.233--The title of Sec. 190.233 would be corrected to 
read ``Corrective action orders.''
    3. Sec. 191.7--The address for written reports would be changed to 
Room 7128.
    4. Sec. 192.3--The definition of Transmission line would be 
clarified by inserting a new paragraph in subsection (c) to make clear 
that the sentence, ``A large volume customer may receive similar 
volumes of gas as a distribution center, and includes factories, power 
plants, and institutional users of gas'', is a general comment on the 
entire definition, and not a modifier of only item (c).
    5. Sec. 195.58--The address for written reports would be revised to 
correct the room number to Room 7128.
    6. Sec. 195.440--The paragraph would be revised to indicate that 
the education program required by this section includes reporting of 
hazardous liquid pipeline emergencies to qualified one-call centers, as 
well as ``the operator or the fire, police, or other appropriate public 
officials.''

Rulemaking Analyses

Executive Order 12866

    This final rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735) and, therefore, was 
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The 
final rule is not significant under the Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures of the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034).

Executive Order 13132

    The proposed rule has been analyzed in accordance with the 
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 
(``Federalism''). This proposed rule does not propose any regulation 
that:
    (1) Has substantial direct effected on the States, the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or the distribution of 
power and responsibilities among the various levels of government;
    (2) Imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and local 
governments; or
    (3) Preempts state law.
    Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of Executive 
Order 13132 do not apply.

Executive Order 13084

    The proposed rule has been analyzed in accordance with the 
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13084, 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments.'' 
Because the proposed rules would not significantly or uniquely affect 
the Indian tribal governments, the funding and consultation 
requirements of Executive Order 13084 do not apply.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This rulemaking will not impose additional requirements on pipeline 
operators, including small entities that operate regulated pipelines. 
Rather, the proposed rule clarifies parts of the pipeline safety 
regulations, incorporates the most recent editions of voluntary 
consensus standards, and provides additional operating flexibility to 
gas and hazardous liquid pipeline companies. Thus, this rulemaking may 
reduce costs to operators, including small entities. Based on the facts 
available about the expected impact of this rulemaking, I certify, 
under Section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605), 
that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.

National Environmental Policy Act

    We have analyzed the proposed rule changes for purposes of the 
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Because the 
changes would require that alternative repair methods be as safe as the 
methods now allowed, we have preliminarily determined that the proposed 
changes would not significantly affect the quality of the human 
environment. An environmental assessment document is available for 
review in the docket.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    There are no new information collection requirements in this final 
rule.

Impact on Business Processes and Computer Systems

    We do not want to impose new requirements that would mandate 
business process changes when the

[[Page 15294]]

resources necessary to implement those requirements would otherwise be 
applied to ``Y2K'' or related computer problems. This proposed rule 
would not mandate business process changes or require modifications to 
computer systems. Because this proposed rule would not affect 
organizations' ability to respond to those problems, we are not 
proposing to delay the effectiveness of the requirements.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of $100 
million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments, in the 
aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome 
alternative that achieves the objective of the rule.

List of Subjects

49 CFR Part 190

    Administrative practice and procedures, Penalties, Pipeline safety.

49 CFR Part 191

    Pipeline safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

49 CFR Part 192

    Incorporation by reference, Natural gas, Pipeline safety, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

49 CFR Part 195

    Anhydrous ammonia, Carbon dioxide, Incorporation by reference, 
Petroleum, Pipeline safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    In consideration of the foregoing, RSPA proposes to amend 49 CFR 
Parts 190, 191, 192, and 195 as follows:

PART 190--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 190 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321; 49 U.S.C. 5101-5127, 60101 et seq.; 
Sec. 212-213, Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857; 49 CFR 1.53.

    2. Paragraph (a)(1) of Sec. 190.11 would be amended by revising the 
last sentence to read as follows:


Sec. 190.11  Availability of informal guidance and interpretive 
assistance.

    (a) Availability of telephonic and Internet assistance. (1) * * * 
The telephone number for OPS information is (202) 366-4431 and the OPS 
website can be accessed via the Internet at http://ops.dot.gov.
* * * * *
    3. The heading of Sec. 190.233 would be revised to read as follows:


Sec. 190.233  Corrective action orders.

* * * * *

PART 191-- [AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 191 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5121, 60102, 60103, 60104, 60108, 60117, 
60118, and 60124; and 49 CFR 1.53

    2. Section 191.7 would be amended by revising the first sentence to 
read as follows:


Sec. 191.7  Addressee for written reports.

    Each written report required by this part must be made to the 
Information Resources Manager, Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and 
Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Room 7128, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. * * *

PART 192--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 192 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, 60108, 60109, 60110, 
60113, and 60118; and 49 CFR 1.53.

    2. The definition of Transmission line in Sec. 192.3 would be 
revised to read as follows:


Sec. 192.3  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Transmission line means:
    (1) A pipeline, other than a gathering line, that:
    (i) Transports gas from a gathering line or storage facility to a 
distribution center, storage facility, or large volume customer that is 
not downstream from a distribution center;
    (ii) Operates at a hoop stress of 20 percent or more of SMYS; or
    (iii) Transports gas within a storage field.
    (2) A large volume customer may receive similar volumes of gas as a 
distribution center, and includes factories, power plants, and 
institutional users of gas.
* * * * *
    3. Section 192.121 would be amended by revising the definition for 
``S'' following the equation to read as follows:


Sec. 192.121  Design of plastic pipe.

* * * * *
Where:
* * * * *
S=For thermoplastic pipe, the HDB determined in accordance with the 
listed specification at a temperature equal to 73 deg.F (23  deg.C), 
100 deg.F (38 deg.C), 120 deg.F (49 deg.C), or 140 deg.F (60 deg.C). 
In the absence an HDB established at the specified temperature, the 
HDB of a higher temperature may be used in determining a design 
pressure rating at the specified temperature by arithmetic 
interpolation using the procedure in Part E, Policy for determining 
long term strength (LTHS) by temperature interpolation, of PPI TR-3/
2000. For reinforced thermosetting plastic pipe, 11,000 psi (75,842 
kPa).
* * * * *
    4. Section 192.123 would be amended by revising paragraphs (a) 
introductory text and (b)(2)(i) and adding paragraph (e) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.123  Design limitations for plastic pipe.

    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the design 
pressure may not exceed a gauge pressure of 689 kPa (100 p.s.i.g.) for 
plastic pipe used in:
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) For thermoplastic pipe, the temperature at which the HDB used 
in the design formula under Sec. 192.121 is determined. However, if the 
pipe was manufactured before May 18, 1978, and its HDB was determined 
at 73 deg.F (23 deg.C), it may be used at temperatures up to 100 deg.F 
(38 deg.C).
* * * * *
    (e) The design pressure for thermoplastic pipe produced after 
[effective date of final rule] may exceed a gauge pressure of 689 kPa 
(100 p.s.i.g.) provided that:
    (1) The design pressure does not exceed 862 kPa (125 p.s.i.g.);
    (2) The material is a PE2406 or a PE3408 as specified within ASTM 
D2513;
    (3) The pipe size is nominal pipe size (IPS) 12 or less; and
    (4) The design pressure is determined in accordance with the design 
equation defined in Sec. 192.121.
    5. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 192.145 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.145  Valves.

    (a) Except for cast iron and plastic valves, each valve must meet 
the minimum requirements of API 6D. A valve may not be used under 
operating conditions that exceed the applicable pressure-temperature 
ratings contained in those requirements.
* * * * *
    6. Section 192.225 would be amended by revising the section heading 
and paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec. 192.225  Welding procedures.

    (a) Welding must be performed by a qualified welder in accordance 
with welding procedures qualified under Section 5 of API 1104 or 
Section IX of

[[Page 15295]]

the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The quality of the test welds 
used to qualify the procedure shall be determined by destructive 
testing.
* * * * *
    7. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 192.227 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.227  Qualification of welders.

    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each 
welder must be qualified in accordance with Section 6 of API 1104 or 
Section IX of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. However, a 
welder qualified under an earlier edition than listed in Appendix A of 
this part may weld but may not requalify under that earlier edition.
* * * * *
    8. Paragraph (c)(1) of Sec. 192.229 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.229  Limitations on welders.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) May not weld on pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces 
a hoop stress of 20 percent or more of SMYS unless within the preceding 
7\1/2\ calendar months, but at least twice each calendar year, the 
welder has had one weld tested and found acceptable under section 6 or 
9 of API 1104, except that a welder qualified under an earlier edition 
previously listed in Appendix A of this part may weld but may not 
requalify under that earlier edition; and
* * * * *
    9. Section 192.241 would be amended by revising paragraph (a) 
introductory text and the last sentence of paragraph (c) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.241  Inspection and test of welds.

    (a) Visual inspection of welding must be conducted by an inspector 
qualified by appropriate training and experience to ensure that:
* * * * *
    (c) * * * However, if a girth weld is unacceptable under those 
standards for a reason other than a crack, and if Appendix A to API 
1104 applies to the weld, the acceptability of the weld may be further 
determined under that appendix.
    10. The heading of Sec. 192.283 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.283  Plastic pipe: Qualifying joining procedures.

* * * * *
    11. The heading of Sec. 192.285 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.285  Plastic pipe: Qualifying persons to make joints.

* * * * *
    12. The heading of Sec. 192.287 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.287  Plastic pipe: Inspection of joints.

* * * * *
    13. Section 192.321 would be amended by revising paragraph (a) and 
adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:


Sec. 192.321  Installation of plastic pipe.

    (a) Plastic pipe must be installed below ground level except as 
provided by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section.
* * * * *
    (h) Plastic pipe may be installed on bridges provided that it is:
    (1) Installed with protection from mechanical damage, such as 
installation in a metallic casing;
    (2) Protected from ultraviolet radiation; and
    (3) Not allowed to exceed the pipe temperature limits specified in 
Sec. 192.123.
    14. Section 192.505 would be amended by revising paragraphs (d)(1), 
(d)(2), and (d)(3) to read as follows:


Sec. 192.505  Strength test requirements for steel pipeline to operate 
at a hoop stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) The component was tested to at least the pressure required for 
the pipeline to which it is being added;
    (2) The component was manufactured under a quality control system 
that ensures that each item manufactured is at least equal in strength 
to a prototype and that the prototype was tested to at least the 
pressure required for the pipeline to which it is being added; or
    (3) The component carries a pressure rating established through 
ASME/ANSI, MSS specification, or a pressure rating established by unit 
strength calculations as described in Sec. 192.143.
* * * * *
    15. Paragraph (d) of Sec. 192.611 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.611  Change in class location: Confirmation or revision of 
maximum allowable operating pressure.

* * * * *
    (d) Confirmation or revision of the maximum allowable operating 
pressure that is required as a result of a study under Sec. 192.609 
must be completed within 24 months of the change in class location. 
Pressure reduction under paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section 
within the 24-month period does not preclude establishing a maximum 
allowable operating pressure under paragraph (a)(3) of this section at 
a later date.
    16. Section 192.614 would be amended by republishing paragraph (d) 
introductory text and revising paragraphs (c)(5), (d)(1), (d)(2), and 
(e) introductory text to read as follows:


Sec. 192.614  Damage prevention program.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) Provide for temporary marking of buried pipelines in the area 
of excavation activity before the activity begins, except in 
emergencies.
* * * * *
    (d) A damage prevention program under this section is not required 
for the following pipelines:
    (1) Pipelines located offshore.
    (2) Pipelines to which access is physically controlled by the 
operators.
* * * * *
    (e) Pipelines operated by persons other than municipalities 
(including operators of master meter systems) whose primary activity 
does not include the transportation of gas need not comply with the 
following:
* * * * *
    17. Paragraph (b)(2) of Sec. 192.723 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 192.723  Distribution systems: Leakage surveys.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) A leakage survey with leak detector equipment must be conducted 
outside of business districts as frequently as necessary at intervals 
not exceeding 63 months, but at least once every 5 calendar years. 
However, for cathodically unprotected distribution lines subject to 
Sec. 192.465(e) on which electrical surveys for corrosion are 
impractical, leakage surveys must be conducted at intervals not 
exceeding 39 months, but at least once every 3 calendar years.
    18. Appendix A of Part 192 would be revised to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 192--Incorporated by Reference

I. List of Organizations and Addresses

    A. American Gas Association (AGA), 400 North Capitol Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20001.
    B. American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20005.
    C. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr 
Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.
    D. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 3 Park 
Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.
    E. Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and 
Fittings Industry, Inc. (MSS), 127 Part Street, NW, Vienna, VA 
22180.

    F. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch 
Park, P.O. Box 9101, Quincy, MA 02269-9101.
    G. Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI), 1825 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW, Suite 680, Washington, DC 20009.

[[Page 15296]]

II. Documents Incorporated by Reference (Numbers in Parentheses 
Indicate Applicable Editions)

    A. American Gas Association (AGA):
    (1) AGA Pipeline Research Committee, Project PR-3-805, ``A 
Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded 
Pipe'' (December 22, 1989).
    B. American Petroleum Institute (API):
    (1) API Specification 5L ``Specification for Line Pipe'' (42nd 
edition, 2000)
    (2) API Recommended Practice 5L1 ``Recommended Practice for 
Railroad Transportation of Line Pipe'' (4th edition, 1990).
    (3) API Specification 6D ``Specification for Pipeline Valves 
(Gate, Plug, Ball, and Check Valves)'' (21st edition, 1994).
    (4) API 1104 ``Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities'' 
(19th edition, 1999).
    C. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):
    (1) ASTM Designation: A 53 ``Standard Specification for Pipe, 
Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless'' 
(A53-99).
    (2) ASTM Designation: A106 ``Standard Specification for Seamless 
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service'' (A106-99).
    (3) ASTM Designation: A333/A333M ``Standard Specification for 
Seamless and Welded Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service'' (A333/
A333M-99).
    (4) ASTM Designation: A372/A372M ``Standard Specification for 
Carbon and Alloy Steel Forgings for Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels'' 
(A372/A372M-99).
    (5) ASTM Designation: A381 ``Standard Specification for Metal-
Arc-Welded Steel Pipe for Use With High-Pressure Transmission 
Systems'' (A381-96).
    (6) ASTM Designation: A671 ``Standard Specification for 
Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower 
Temperatures'' (A671-96).
    (7) ASTM Designation: A672 ``Standard Specification for 
Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure Service at 
Moderate Temperatures'' (A672-96).
    (8) ASTM Designation: A691 ``Standard Specification for Carbon 
and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure 
Service at High Temperatures'' (A691-98).
    (9) ASTM Designation: D638 ``Standard Test Method for Tensile 
Properties of Plastics'' (D638-97).
    (10) ASTM Designation: D2513 ``Standard Specification for 
Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings'' (D2513-87 
edition for Sec. 192.63(a)(1), otherwise D2513-98).
    (11) ASTM Designation: D 2517 ``Standard Specification for 
Reinforced Epoxy Resin Gas Pressure Pipe and Fittings'' (D2517-98)
    (12) ASTM Designation: F1055 ``Standard Specification for 
Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside Diameter 
Controlled Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing'' (F1055-98).
    D. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME):
    (1) ASME/ANSI B16.1 ``Cast Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged 
Fittings'' (1998).
    (2) ASME/ANSI B16.5 ``Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings'' (1996, 
includes 1998 Addenda).
    (3) ASME/ANSI B31G ``Manual for Determining the Remaining 
Strength of Corroded Pipelines'' (1991).
    (4) ASME/ANSI B31.8 ``Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping 
systems'' (1995).
    (5) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section I ``Power 
Boilers'' (1998).
    (6) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 
1 ``Pressure Vessels'' (1998).
    (7) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 
2 ``Pressure Vessels: Alternative Rules'' (1998).
    (8) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX ``Welding 
and Brazing Qualifications'' (1998).
    E. Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and 
Fittings Industry, Inc. (MSS):
    (1) MSS SP44-96 ``Steel Pipe Line Flanges'' (includes 1996 
errata) (1996).
    (2) [Reserved]
    F. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA):
    (1) NFPA 30 ``Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code'' (1996).
    (2) ANSI/NFPA 58 ``Standard for the Storage and Handling of 
Liquefied Petroleum Gases'' (1998).
    (3) ANSI/NFPA 59 ``Standard for the storage and Handling of 
Liquefied Petroleum Gases at Utility Gas Plants'' (1998).
    (4) ANSI/NFPA 70 ``National Electrical Code'' (1999).
    G. Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI):
    (1) PPI TR-3/2000 ``Policies and Procedures for Developing 
Hydrostatic Design Bases (HDB), Pressure Design Bases (PDB), and 
Minimum Required Strength (MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping 
Materials'' (2000).

    19. Appendix B to Part 192 would be amended by revising part I and 
the heading of part II.A. to read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 192--Qualification of Pipe

I. Listed Pipe Specifications (Numbers in Parentheses Indicate 
Applicable Editions)

API 5L--Steel pipe (2000)
ASTM A 53-Steel pipe (A 53-99).
ASTM A 106--Steel pipe (A 106-99)
ASTM A 333/A 333M--Steel pipe (A 333/A 333M-99)
ASTM A 381--Steel pipe (A 381-96)
ASTM D 671--Steel pipe (A 671-96)
ASTM D 672--Steel pipe (A 672-96)
ASTM D 691--Steel pipe (A 691-98)
ASTM D 2513--Thermoplastic pipe and tubing (D 2513-98)
ASTM D 2517--Thermosetting plastic pipe and tubing (D 2517-98)

II. Steel Pipe of Unknown or Unlisted Specification

    A. Bending properties. * * *
* * * * *

PART 195--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 195 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, 60108, 60109, 60118; 
and 49 CFR 1.53

    2. Section 195.2 would be amended by adding a definition in 
alphabetical order to read as follows:


Sec. 195.2  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Maximum operating pressure (MOP) means the maximum pressure at 
which a pipeline or segment of a pipeline may be normally operated 
under this part.
* * * * *
    3. Section 195.3 would be amended by revising paragraphs (b) and 
(c) to read as follows:


Sec. 195.3  Matter incorporated by reference.

* * * * *
    (b) All incorporated materials are available for inspection in the 
Research and Special Programs Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC, and at the office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
Capitol Street, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC. These materials have 
been approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the 
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 
In addition, materials incorporated by reference are available as 
follows:
    (1) American Gas Association (AGA), 400 North Capitol Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20001.
    (2) American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20005.
    (3) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 3 Park Avenue, 
New York, NY 10016-5990.
    (4) Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings 
Industry, Inc. (MSS), 127 Part Street, NW, Vienna, VA 22180.
    (5) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr 
Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.
    (6) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch 
Park, P.O. Box 9101, Quincy, MA 02269-9101.
    (c) The full titles of publications incorporated by reference 
wholly or partially in this part are as follows. Numbers in parentheses 
indicate applicable editions:
    (1) American Gas Association (AGA):
    (i) AGA Pipeline Research Committee, Project PR-3-805, ``A Modified 
Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe'' 
(December 22, 1989). The RSTRENG program may be used for calculating 
remaining strength.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (2) American Petroleum Institute (API):

[[Page 15297]]

    (i) API Specification 5L ``Specification for Line Pipe'' (42nd 
edition, 2000)
    (ii) API Specification 6D ``Specification for Pipeline Valves 
(Gate, Plug, Ball, and Check Valves)'' (21st edition, 1994).
    (iii) API Specification 12F ``Specification for Shop Welded Tanks 
for Storage of Production Liquids'' (11th edition, November 1994).
    (iv) API 510 ``Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: Maintenance 
Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration'' (8th edition, June 1997).
    (v) API Standard 620 ``Design and Construction of Large, Welded, 
Low-Pressure Storage Tanks'' (8th edition, 1990).
    (vi) API 650 ``Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage'' (1998).
    (vii) API Recommended Practice 651 ``Cathodic Protection of 
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks'' (2nd edition, December 1997).
    (viii) API Recommended Practice 652 ``Lining of Aboveground 
Petroleum Storage Tank Bottoms'' (2nd edition, December 1997).
    (ix) API Standard 653 ``Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and 
Reconstruction'' (2nd edition, December 1995, including Addenda 1, 
December 1996).
    (x) API 1104 ``Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities'' (19th 
edition, 1999).
    (xi) API Standard 2000 ``Venting Atmospheric and Low-Pressure 
Storage Tanks'' (4th edition, September 1992).
    (xii) API Recommended Practice 2003 ``Protection Against Ignitions 
Arising out of Static, Lightning, and Stray Currents'' (6th edition, 
December 1998).
    (xiii) API Publication 2026 ``Safe Access/Egress Involving Floating 
Roofs of Storage Tanks in Petroleum Service'' (2nd edition, April 
1998).
    (xiv) API Recommended Practice 2350 ``Overfill Protection for 
Storage Tanks In Petroleum Facilities'' (2nd edition, January 1996).
    (xv) API Standard 2510 ``Design and Construction of LPG 
Installations'' (7th edition, May 1995).
    (3) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME):
    (i) ASME/ANSI B16.9 ``Factory-Made Wrought Steel Buttwelding 
Fittings'' (1993).
    (ii) ASME/ANSI B31.4 ``Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid 
Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids'' (1998).
    (iii) ASME/ANSI B31.8 ``Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping 
Systems'' (1995).
    (iv) ASME/ANSI B31G ``Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength 
of Corroded Pipelines'' (1991).
    (v) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII ``Pressure 
Vessels,'' Divisions 1 and 2 (1998).
    (vi) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX ``Welding and 
Brazing Qualifications'' (1998).
    (4) Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings 
Industry, Inc. (MSS):
    (i) MSS SP-75 ``Specification for High Test Wrought Butt Welding 
Fittings'' (1993).
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (5) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):
    (i) ASTM Designation: A53 ``Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, 
Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated Welded and Seamless'' (A53-99).
    (ii) ASTM Designation: A106 ``Standard Specification for Seamless 
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service'' (A106-99).
    (iii) ASTM Designation: A 333/A 333M ``Standard Specification for 
Seamless and Welded Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service'' (A 333/A 
333M-99).
    (iv) ASTM Designation: A 381 ``Standard Specification for Metal-
Arc-Welded Steel Pipe for Use With High-Pressure Transmission Systems'' 
(A 381-96).
    (v) ASTM Designation: A 671 ``Standard Specification for Electric-
Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures'' (A 
671-96).
    (vi) ASTM Designation: A 672 ``Standard Specification for Electric-
Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure Service at Moderate 
Temperatures'' (A 672-96).
    (vii) ASTM Designation: A 691 ``Standard Specification for Carbon 
and Alloy Steel Pipe Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure Service 
at High Temperatures'' (A 691-98).
    (6) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA):
    (i) ANSI/NFPA 30 ``Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code'' (1996).
    (ii) [Reserved]
    4. Paragraph (e) of Sec. 195.50 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 195.50  Reporting accidents.

* * * * *
    (e) A personal injury necessitating in-patient hospitalization.
* * * * *
    5. Section 195.58 would be amended by revising the first sentence 
to read as follows:


Sec. 195.58  Address for written reports.

    Each written report required by this subpart must be made to the 
Information Resources Manager, Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and 
Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Room 7128, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. * * *
    6. Section 195.214 would be amended by revising the section heading 
and paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec. 195.214  Welding procedures.

    (a) Welding must be performed by a qualified welder in accordance 
with welding procedures qualified under Section 5 of API 1104 or 
Section IX of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The quality of 
the test welds used to qualify the procedure shall be determined by 
destructive testing.
* * * * *
    7. Section 195.222 would be revised to read follows:


Sec. 195.222  Welders: Qualification of welders.

    Each welder must be qualified in accordance with Section 6 of API 
1104 or Section IX of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, except 
that a welder qualified under an earlier edition than listed in 195.3 
may weld but may not requalify under that earlier edition.
    8. Paragraph (b) of Sec. 195.228 would be revised to read as 
follows:


Sec. 195.228  Welds and welding inspection: Standards of acceptability.

* * * * *
    (b) The acceptability of a weld is determined according to the 
standards in Section 9 of API 1104. However, if a girth weld is 
unacceptable under those standards for a reason other than a crack, and 
if Appendix A to API 1104 applies to the weld, the acceptability of the 
weld may be determined under that appendix.
    9. Section 195.440 would be amended by revising the first sentence 
to read as follows:


Sec. 195.440  Public education.

    Each operator shall establish a continuing education program to 
enable the public, appropriate government organizations and persons 
engaged in excavation-related activities to recognize a hazardous 
liquid or a carbon dioxide pipeline emergency and to report it to the 
qualified one-call system, the operator, or the fire, police, or other 
appropriate public officials. * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 8, 2000.
Richard B. Felder,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 00-6353 Filed 3-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P