[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6927-6929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 99-SW-39-AD]


Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model AS-350B, BA, 
B1, B2, and D, and Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing 
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to Eurocopter France Model AS-
350B, BA, B1, B2, and D, and Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N 
helicopters, that currently requires inspecting the main gearbox 
suspension bi-directional cross-beam (cross-beam) for cracks, and 
replacing the cross-beam if a crack is found. This action would require 
the same inspections as the existing AD but would add the time 
intervals for performing repetitive dye-penetrant inspections on cross-
beams with 5,000 or more hours time-in-service (TIS). This proposal is 
prompted by the discovery that time intervals for performing the 
required dye-penetrant inspections are not included in the existing AD. 
The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent 
failure of the cross-beam that could cause the main gearbox to pivot 
resulting in severe vibrations and a subsequent forced landing.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 
Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-SW-39-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, 
Fort Worth, Texas 76137. Comments may be inspected at this location 
between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.
    The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
obtained from American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand 
Prairie, Texas 75053-4005, telephone (972) 641-3460, fax (972) 641-
3527. This information may be examined at the FAA, Office of the 
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort 
Worth, Texas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Grigg, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, 
Rotorcraft Directorate, ASW-111, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 
76137, telephone (817) 222-5490, fax (817) 222-5961.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
light of the comments received.
    Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
to Docket No. 99-SW-39-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
to the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 
Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-SW-39-AD, 2601

[[Page 6928]]

Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

Discussion

    On June 19, 1998, the FAA issued AD 98-14-01, Amendment 39-10635 
(63 FR 35128, June 29, 1998), to require visual and dye-penetrant 
inspections of the cross-beam for cracks and replacement with an 
airworthy cross-beam if a crack is found. That action was prompted by 
several reports of cracks in the cross-beam. The requirements of that 
AD are intended to provide a terminating action to prevent failure of 
the cross-beam that could cause the main gearbox to pivot resulting in 
severe vibrations and a subsequent forced landing.
    Since the issuance of that AD, the FAA has discovered that the time 
intervals for performing the required repetitive dye-penetrant 
inspections on cross-beams with 5,000 or more hours TIS were not 
included. The initial dye-penetrant inspection for cracks must be 
performed when the cross-beams attain 5,000 hours TIS or 2,750 cycles, 
whichever occurs first. Thereafter, repetitive dye-penetrant 
inspections for cracks must be performed at intervals not to exceed 550 
hours TIS or 2,750 operating cycles, whichever occurs first.
    Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
exist or develop on other Eurocopter France Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, 
and D, and Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters of the same type 
design, the proposed AD would supersede AD 98-14-01 to require, at 
specified time intervals or cycles, repetitive visual and dye-penetrant 
inspections of the cross-beam for cracks, and replacing, if necessary, 
the cross-beam with an airworthy cross-beam.
    The FAA estimates that 454 helicopters of U.S. registry would be 
affected by this proposed AD; that it would take approximately 0.5 work 
hour per helicopter to accomplish each visual inspection, with an 
estimated average of 150 visual inspections per helicopter, 3 work 
hours per helicopter to accomplish a dye-penetrant inspection, with an 
estimated average of 3 dye-penetrant inspections per helicopter, and 6 
work hours per helicopter to replace the cross-beam, if necessary; and 
that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Parts would cost 
approximately $6,000 per cross-beam. Based on these figures, the total 
cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
$5,175,600 to perform 150 visual inspections and an average of 3 dye-
penetrant inspections per helicopter and to replace the cross-beam on 
all 454 helicopters.
    The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-10635 (63 FR 
35128, June 29, 1998) and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD) 
to read as follows:

Eurocopter France: Docket No. 99-SW-39-AD. Supersedes AD 98-14-01, 
Amendment 39-10635, Docket No. 97-SW-25-AD.

    Applicability: Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, and D, and Model AS-
355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters, with main gearbox suspension bi-
directional cross-beam (cross-beam), part number (P/N) 350A38-1018-
all dash numbers, installed, certificated in any category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of 
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To prevent failure of the cross-beam that could lead to rotation 
of the main gearbox resulting in severe vibrations and a subsequent 
forced landing, accomplish the following:
    (a) For cross-beams having 2,000 or more hours time-in-service 
(TIS) or 10,000 or more operating cycles, whichever occurs first:

    Note 2: The Master Service Recommendations and the flight log 
contain accepted procedures that are used to determine the 
cumulative operating cycles on the rotorcraft.

    (1) Within 30 hours TIS, and thereafter at intervals not to 
exceed 30 hours TIS or 150 operating cycles, whichever occurs first, 
visually inspect the cross-beam for cracks in accordance with 
paragraph 2.B.1 of Eurocopter France Service Bulletin No. 05.00.28, 
applicable to Model AS-350 helicopters, or Eurocopter France Service 
Bulletin No. 05.00.29, applicable to Model AS-355 helicopters, both 
dated May 26, 1997.
    (2) If a crack is found remove the cross-beam and replace it 
with an airworthy cross-beam.
    (b) For cross-beams having 5,000 or more hours TIS:
    (1) In addition to continuing the repetitive inspections of 
paragraph (a)(1), before further flight, and thereafter at intervals 
not to exceed 550 hours TIS or 2,750 operating cycles, whichever 
occurs first, perform a dye-penetrant inspection in accordance with 
paragraph 2.B.2) of Eurocopter France Service Bulletin No. 05.00.28, 
applicable to Model AS-350 helicopters, or Eurocopter Service 
Bulletin No. 05.00.29, applicable to Model AS-355 helicopters, both 
dated May 26, 1996.
    (2) If a crack is found remove the cross-beam and replace it 
with an airworthy cross-beam.
    (c) Prior to installing any replacement cross-beams, regardless 
of TIS or operating cycles, inspect the replacement cross-beam in 
accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this AD.

[[Page 6929]]

    (d) Modifying the helicopter in accordance with paragraph 2.B of 
the Accomplishment Instructions in Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 
63.00.07, applicable to Model AS-350B, BA, B1, B2, and D 
helicopters, or Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 63.00.13, applicable 
to Model AS-355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters, both dated April 7, 
1997, constitutes terminating action for the requirements of this 
AD.
    (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, FAA, Rotorcraft 
Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an FAA 
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then 
send it to the Manager, Regulations Group.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the Regulations Group.

    (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

    Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Direction 
Generale De L'Aviation Civile (France) AD 96-156-071(B)R1 and AD 96-
155-053(B)R1, both dated June 4, 1997.


    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 4, 2000.
Eric Bries,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 00-3225 Filed 2-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U