[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 201-202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-44]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2000 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 201]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 303 and 381
[Docket No. 99-055R]
Exemption of Retail Operations from Inspection Requirements
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final interpretative rule with an opportunity for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service is advising interested
persons that, in determining whether an establishment is a retail store
or restaurant or a similar retail-type establishment that is exempt
from requirements for inspection under the Federal Meat Inspection Act
or the Poultry Products Inspection Act, the Agency will not consider
sales of products that simply ``pass through'' the establishment
without any processing or handling other than storage and activities
incidental to storage. The effect of this interpretation is to exclude
the value of those products in deciding whether, under the Agency's
regulations, sales to hotels, restaurants, and similar institutions
disqualify the establishment from exemption as a retail store. The
Agency is providing an opportunity to comment on its interpretation in
advance of upcoming rulemaking on the exemption of retail operations
from inspection requirements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Derfler, Deputy Administrator,
Office of Policy, Program Development and Evaluation, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, Washington, DC 20250-3700; (202) 720-2710.
DATES: This interpretative rule is effective January 4, 2000. Comments
may be submitted by February 3, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Submit one original and two copies of written comments to
FSIS Docket Clerk, Docket No. 99-055R, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Food Safety and Inspection Service, Room 102, Cotton Annex, 300 12th
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20250-3700. All comments submitted will be
available for public inspection in the Docket Clerk's office between
8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Food Safety and Inspection Service
(FSIS) administers a regulatory program under the Federal Meat
Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and the Poultry Products
Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) that is designed to
protect the health and welfare of consumers by preventing the
distribution of products that are unwholesome, adulterated, or
misbranded. Both the FMIA and the PPIA include requirements for federal
inspection, and they prohibit selling or transporting, offering for
sale or transportation, or receiving for transportation, in commerce,
products that are adulterated or misbranded and products that are
required to be inspected, unless they have been inspected and passed
(21 U.S.C. 458(a)(2) and 610(c)). Intrastate operations and
transactions are effectively subject to the same requirements and
prohibitions, pursuant to a State inspection program or designation for
federal inspection (21 U.S.C. 454(c)(1) and 661(c)(1)).
Both the FMIA and the PPIA provide that the statutory provisions
requiring inspection of the slaughter of livestock or poultry and the
preparation or processing of products thereof do not apply to
``operations of types traditionally and usually conducted at retail
stores and restaurants, when conducted at any retail store or
restaurant or similar retail-type establishment for sale in normal
retail quantities or service * * * to consumers at such establishments
if such establishments are subject to such inspection provisions only
under this paragraph'' (i.e., establishments that are subject to
federal inspection because they are located in designated States and
territories) (21 U.S.C. 454(c)(2) and 661(c)(2)). In Sec. 303.1(d) and
Sec. 381.10(d), respectively (9 CFR 303.1(d) and 381.10(d)), FSIS
addresses the conditions under which Federal or state inspection
requirements do not apply to retail operations.
A recent FSIS notice advised the public that the Agency is
reviewing its regulations on the exemption of retail operations from
requirements for inspection under the FMIA or the PPIA (64 FR 55694,
October 14, 1999). The notice advised that the Agency intends to
initiate notice-and-comment rulemaking on the application of inspection
requirements and on handling conditions necessary to ensure that
products delivered to consumers are not adulterated or misbranded (see
21 U.S.C. 454, 455, 463(a), 464, 603 through 606, 623, 624, and 661).
As part of this review, the Agency has reevaluated USDA's historical
treatment of products that simply pass through an establishment without
any processing or handling (e.g., unwrapping or rewrapping) other than
storage and activities, such as the unloading of vehicles, that are
incidental to storage.
The FMIA defines ``prepared'' as ``slaughtered, canned, salted,
rendered, boned, cut up, or otherwise manufactured or processed'' (21
U.S.C. 601(l)), and for purposes of the PPIA, ``processed'' means
slaughtered, canned, salted, stuffed, rendered, boned, cut up, or
otherwise manufactured or processed'' (21 U.S.C. 453(w)). The statutory
provisions that require the inspection of slaughter and product
preparation or processing (21 U.S.C. 455 and 603 through 606) do not
require the inspection of storage and related activities. Other
statutory provisions apply to businesses that involve product sales and
storage, such as warehouses (see, e.g., 21 U.S.C. 460(b)(2) and (e),
463(a), 624, 642(a)(2), and 645).
Because products that simply ``pass through'' an establishment do
not undergo any processing or handling other than storage and
activities incidental to storage, sales of these products should not be
considered in determining whether an establishment's operations are
exempt from requirements for Federal or state inspection. Currently,
this question can arise when a store that otherwise meets the
requirements for exemption under Sec. 303.1(d)(2) or Sec. 381.10(d)(2)
has sales to hotels, restaurants, or similar institutions. Under the
regulations (paragraphs (d)(2)(iii)(b) and (d)(2)(vi) of Secs. 303.1
and 381.10), sales of meat or poultry products to hotels, restaurants,
[[Page 202]]
and similar institutions do not disqualify an establishment from
exemption as a retail store so long as they do not exceed either of two
maximum limits: 25 percent of the dollar value of total product sales
and the total calendar year dollar limitation. (The Administrator
adjusts the dollar limitation, which currently is $41,000 under the
FMIA and $39,000 under the PPIA (63 FR 41540, August 4, 1998), when the
Consumer Price Index indicates a change of more than $500 in the price
of the same volume of product.) FSIS applies these limits when it
investigates complaints alleging that retail stores claiming exemption
under Sec. 303.1(d) or Sec. 381.10(d) have been operating in violation
of the conditions prescribed in the regulations (see paragraph (d)(3)
of Secs. 303.1 and 381.10).
Because FSIS's conclusion rests on its views about the scope of the
FMIA and PPIA requirements for inspection (21 U.S.C. 455 and 603
through 606), the Agency has decided that it should begin applying its
interpretation now with respect to sales of products that clearly have
not undergone any processing or handling other than storage and
activities incidental to storage, rather than waiting until the
anticipated rulemaking on the exemption regulations. The effect of this
interpretative rule is to exclude the value of products such as
properly labeled packages of bacon and cans of poultry stew that ``pass
through'' an establishment in deciding whether sales to hotels,
restaurants, and similar institutions exceed either of the two maximum
limits. Future calculations of the total dollar value of an
establishment's sales to hotels, restaurants, and similar institutions
and the proportion of its total product sales that institutional sales
represent will not include the value of products so identified.
Not counting sales of products that clearly ``pass through'' an
establishment without undergoing any processing or handling other than
storage and activities incidental to storage essentially returns FSIS
to USDA's practice during the early years of the retail exemption
regulations. However, USDA then based the practice on a decision that
these sales were traditional and usual for retail stores. That decision
was challenged in 1975, and in January 1976, when commenters did not
provide ``evidence to support a conclusion that such sales of
prepackaged inspected products to nonhousehold consumers had been a
traditional and usual retail operation,'' USDA withdrew a proposed rule
that would have codified rules for applying the exclusion (40 FR
15906).
The basis for FSIS's action today is different, as explained above.
In fact, FSIS views the ``traditionally and usually'' criterion in the
retail operations exemption (21 U.S.C. 454(c)(2) and 661(c)(2)) as only
restricting the types of preparation or processing operations--those
``types traditionally and usually conducted at retail stores and
restaurants''--that an establishment may conduct. This is not the issue
here. Other criteria in the statutory exemption address the product
sales aspects of retail operations.
FSIS does recognize that the views of various members of the public
may differ on the circumstances under which products should be treated
as ``passing through'' an establishment. Therefore, it is providing the
public with an opportunity to submit comments for consideration by the
Agency during development of its proposed rule on the exemption of
retail operations from inspection requirements. Pending any changes in
the regulations as a result of further rulemaking, the Agency will
address questions about particular products on a case-by-case basis.
Additional Public Notification
FSIS has considered the potential civil rights impact of this
interpretative rule on minorities, women, and persons with
disabilities. Public involvement in all segments of rulemaking and
policy development is important. Consequently, in an effort to better
ensure that minorities, women, and persons with disabilities are aware
of this interpretative rule and are informed about the mechanism for
providing comments, FSIS will announce it and provide copies of this
Federal Register publication in the FSIS Constituent Update.
FSIS provides a weekly FSIS Constituent Update, which is
communicated via fax to over 300 organizations and individuals. In
addition, the update is available on line through the FSIS web page
located at http://www.fsis.usda.gov. The update is used to provide
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, recalls, and any other types of
information that could affect or would be of interest to our
constituents/stakeholders. The constituent fax list consists of
industry, trade, and farm groups, consumer interest groups, allied
health professionals, scientific professionals, and other individuals
that have requested to be included. Through these various channels,
FSIS is able to provide information to a much broader, more diverse
audience. For more information and to be added to the constituent fax
list, fax your request to the Congressional and Public Affairs Office,
at (202) 720-5704.
Done at Washington, DC, on: December 27, 1999.
Thomas J. Billy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-44 Filed 1-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P