[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71194-71226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-32708]



[[Page 71193]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part II





Department of Justice





_______________________________________________________________________



Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention



_______________________________________________________________________



Comprehensive Program Plan for Fiscal Year 2000; Notice

  Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 243 / Monday, December 20, 1999 / 
Notices  

[[Page 71194]]



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
[OJP(OJJDP)-1252f]
RIN No. 1121-ZB86


Comprehensive Program Plan for Fiscal Year 2000

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Final Program Plan for fiscal year 2000.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is 
publishing this notice of its Final Program Plan for fiscal year (FY) 
2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen M. Garry, Director, Information 
Dissemination Unit, at 202-307-5911. [This is not a toll-free number.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is a component of the Office of Justice 
Programs in the U.S. Department of Justice. Pursuant to the provisions 
of Section 204 (b)(5)(A) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 
Prevention Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 5601 et seq. (JJDP 
Act), the Administrator of OJJDP published for public comment a 
Proposed Comprehensive Plan describing the program activities that 
OJJDP proposed to carry out during fiscal year (FY) 2000 under Parts C 
and D of Title II of the JJDP Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. 5651-5665a, 
5667, 5667a. The public was invited to comment on the Proposed Plan 
(published on October 15, 1999, at 64 FR 56084) by November 29, 1999. 
The OJJDP Administrator analyzed the public comments received, and the 
comments and OJJDP's responses are provided below. The Administrator 
took these comments into consideration in developing this Final 
Comprehensive Plan describing the particular program activities that 
OJJDP intends to fund during FY 2000, using in whole or in part funds 
appropriated under Parts C and D of Title II of the JJDP Act.
    OJJDP acknowledged in the Proposed Plan that at the time of 
publication its reauthorization legislation was still in conference and 
its FY 2000 appropriation was not yet final. OJJDP indicated that, 
depending on the outcome of those legislative actions, it might alter 
how its programs are structured and make any necessary modifications in 
the Final Plan following the public comment period. This Final Plan is 
consistent with OJJDP's FY 2000 appropriation and reflects its response 
to the public comments on the Proposed Plan.
    Notice of the official solicitation of grant or cooperative 
agreement applications for competitive programs to be funded under the 
Final Comprehensive Plan will be published at a later date in the 
Federal Register. No proposals, concept papers, or other forms of 
application should be submitted at this time.

Background

    In developing its program plan for Parts C and D each year, OJJDP 
takes into consideration the latest available data on juvenile crime 
and victimization in the United States and views these statistics in 
relation to those of recent years. To know where the Nation's juveniles 
are headed, it is necessary to know where they are and where they have 
been. OJJDP has two primary source materials that provide a 
comprehensive picture of the nature of juvenile crime and violence 
across the Nation: Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report 
(National Report) which assembles the latest data available on juvenile 
crime, victimization, and risk behavior; and Juvenile Arrests 1998, an 
OJJDP Bulletin that highlights just-released data from the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation regarding juvenile arrests and violence. 
1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the National Report or Juvenile Arrests 1998 can 
be obtained by calling OJJDP's Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 
800-638-8736 or by visiting OJJDP's Web site at www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org 
and clicking on ``Publications.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the end of the 1990's, juvenile crime and violence are 
continuing a downward trend that began in 1994, bringing a halt to the 
dramatic annual increases that had alarmed the Nation since 1988. 
Juvenile Arrests 1998 indicates that for the fourth consecutive year, 
the total number of juvenile arrests for violent crimes--murder, 
forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault--declined (p. 1). 
Specifically, serious violence by juveniles dropped 19 percent between 
1994 and 1998, compared with a reduction of 6 percent in violence by 
adults in the same period (Juvenile Arrests, p.1). Between 1993 and 
1998, juvenile arrests for murder declined about half, with the number 
of arrests in 1998 (2,100) about 15 percent above the 1987 level 
(Juvenile Arrests, p. 1). Despite well-publicized instances of shocking 
school violence, students are safer at school than elsewhere, and 
school crime declined from 1993 through 1996 (National Report, p. 31).
    On the other hand, gang problems now affect more jurisdictions than 
ever before--including rural and suburban areas (p. 77). Illicit drug 
use by juveniles, which had declined during the 1980's, has increased 
since 1992 (p. 74), although the National Household Survey on Drug 
Abuse reported that the percentage of 12- to 17-year-olds who reported 
using illegal drugs in the preceding month dropped from 11.4 percent in 
1997 to 9.9 percent in 1998. Looking at arrest data, while drug arrests 
continued to increase for both juveniles and adults between 1993 and 
1997, arrests for most serious violent offenses and property offenses 
declined--with violent crime arrests down 6 percent for juveniles and 
property crime arrests down 3 percent (p. 117). In 1997, the juvenile 
violent crime arrest rate, which had increased 62 percent from 1988 to 
1994, was at its lowest level in this decade: just 7 percent above the 
1989 rate, but still 25 percent above the 1988 rate (p. 120).
    Even in the area of violent behaviors that do not reach the 
attention of the justice system, positive trends are seen. A recent 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) biennial survey of 
16,000 9th through 12th graders found sharp decreases in certain 
categories of violent activity by teenagers between 1991 and 1997. For 
example, 18.3 percent of the students surveyed in 1997 reported having 
carried a gun, knife, or club in the previous month, compared with 26.1 
percent of those surveyed in 1991, and the percentage carrying such 
weapons on school property decreased from 11.8 percent in 1993 to 8.5 
percent in 1997. The frequency of fighting also declined, with 37 
percent of the 1997 surveyed youth reporting involvement in a physical 
fight in the previous year, compared with nearly 43 percent of those 
surveyed in 1991.
    This mixture of some reassuring and some still troubling statistics 
serves as a reminder that while great progress has been made in 
reducing juvenile delinquency, violence, and victimization, much more 
needs to be done. Although it is impossible to definitively identify 
the reasons for the downward trend in juvenile violence, factors cited 
by the authors of the CDC study include community policing and an 
expansion of violence prevention programs. As research and evaluation, 
much of it supported by OJJDP funding, continue to provide information 
about what works in the areas of prevention and intervention, 
policymakers, practitioners, and citizens can make informed decisions 
as to what programs and approaches will best serve to reinforce and 
continue existing trends away from juvenile delinquency, violence, and 
victimization.
    In this Final Comprehensive Plan, OJJDP describes its funding 
activities

[[Page 71195]]

authorized under Part C (National Programs) and Part D (Gang-Free 
Schools and Communities; Community-Based Gang Intervention) of Title II 
of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (JJDP) Act. The 
activities authorized under Parts C and D constitute part, but not all, 
of OJJDP's overall responsibilities, which are outlined briefly below.
    In 1974, the JJDP Act established OJJDP as the Federal agency 
responsible for providing national leadership, coordination, and 
resources to develop and implement effective methods to prevent and 
reduce juvenile delinquency and improve the quality of juvenile justice 
in the United States. OJJDP administers State Formula Grants under Part 
B of Title II, State Challenge Grants under Part E of Title II, and 
Community Prevention Grants under Title V of the JJDP Act to assist 
States and territories to fund a range of delinquency prevention, 
control, and juvenile justice system improvement activities. OJJDP 
provides support activities for these and other programs under 
statutory set-asides that are used to provide related research, 
evaluation, statistics, demonstration, and training and technical 
assistance services.
    Under Part C of Title II of the JJDP Act, OJJDP funds Special 
Emphasis programs and--through its National Institute for Juvenile 
Justice and Delinquency Prevention--numerous research, evaluation, 
statistics, demonstration, training and technical assistance, and 
information dissemination activities. OJJDP funds school and community-
based gang prevention, intervention, and suppression programs under 
Part D and mentoring programs under Part G of Title II of the JJDP Act. 
OJJDP also coordinates Federal activities related to juvenile justice 
and delinquency prevention through the Concentration of Federal Efforts 
Program and serves as the staff agency for the Coordinating Council on 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; both of these activities 
are authorized in Part A of Title II of the JJDP Act. Another OJJDP 
responsibility under the JJDP Act is to administer the Title IV Missing 
and Exploited Children's Program.
    Other programs administered by OJJDP include the Drug Prevention 
Program, the Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws Program, the Safe Schools 
Initiative, the Tribal Youth Program, the Safe Start: Children Exposed 
to Violence Initiative, and the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block 
Grants program. OJJDP also administers programs under the Victims of 
Child Abuse Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 13001 et seq.
    OJJDP focuses its assistance funding and support activities on the 
development and implementation of programs with the greatest potential 
for reducing juvenile delinquency and improving the juvenile justice 
system by establishing partnerships with State and local governments, 
American Indian and Alaska Native jurisdictions, and public and private 
agencies and organizations. OJJDP performs its role of national 
leadership in juvenile justice and delinquency prevention through a 
cycle of activities. These include collecting data and statistics to 
determine the extent and nature of issues affecting juveniles; funding 
research and studies that can lead to demonstrations funded by 
discretionary grants; evaluating demonstration projects; sharing 
lessons learned from the field with practitioners through a range of 
information dissemination vehicles; providing seed money to States and 
local governments through formula and block grants to implement 
programs, projects, or reform efforts; and providing training and 
technical assistance to assist States and local governments to 
implement programs effectively and to maintain the integrity of model 
programs as they are being replicated.
    As noted previously, OJJDP is a component of the Office of Justice 
Programs (OJP). This Department of Justice agency emphasizes the 
importance of coordination among its components and with other Federal 
agencies whenever possible in order to obtain maximum results from OJP 
programs and initiatives. OJJDP's coordination efforts include joint 
funding, interagency agreements, and partnerships to develop, 
implement, and evaluate projects. This Final Plan reflects OJJDP's 
coordination efforts. For a more complete picture of OJP program 
activities that affect the field of juvenile justice, readers are 
encouraged to review the Office of Justice Programs Fiscal Year 2000 
Program Plan when it becomes available. (Readers should check the OJP 
Web site at www.ojp.usdoj.gov periodically for an announcement of the 
availability of the OJP Program Plan.)

Fiscal Year 2000 Program Planning Activities

    The OJJDP program planning process for FY 2000 was coordinated with 
the Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs, and all OJP 
components. The program planning process involved the following steps:
     Internal review of existing programs by OJJDP staff.
     Internal review of proposed programs by OJP bureaus and 
Department of Justice components.
     Review of information and data from OJJDP grantees and 
contractors.
     Review of information contained in State comprehensive 
plans.
     Review of comments from youth service providers, juvenile 
justice practitioners, and researchers who provide input in proposed 
new program areas.
     Consideration of suggestions made by juvenile justice 
policymakers concerning State and local needs.
     Consideration of all comments received during the period 
of public comment on the Proposed Comprehensive Plan.

Discretionary Grant Continuation Policy

    OJJDP has listed on the following pages continuation projects 
currently funded in whole or in part with Part C and Part D funds and 
eligible for continuation funding in FY 2000, either within an existing 
project period or through an extension for an additional project or 
budget period. A grantee's eligibility for continued funding for an 
additional budget period within an existing project period depends on 
the grantee's compliance with funding eligibility requirements and 
achievement of the prior year's objectives. The amount of award is 
based on prior projections, demonstrated need, and fund availability.
    The only projects described in this Final Program Plan are those 
that will receive Part C or Part D FY 2000 continuation funding under 
project period or discretionary continuation assistance awards. The 
Final Program Plan also references new program areas that OJJDP is 
considering for awards under Part C or D in FY 2000. This plan does not 
include descriptions of other OJJDP programs, including mentoring 
programs under Part G of Title II of the JJDP Act, the Drug Prevention 
Program, the Drug-Free Communities Support Program, the Enforcing 
Underage Drinking Laws Program, the Safe Schools Initiative, the Tribal 
Youth Program, the Safe Start: Children Exposed to Violence Initiative, 
and the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants program. When 
appropriate, OJJDP issues separate solicitations for applications for 
funding for these or other programs that are not authorized under Parts 
C and D. Readers interested in learning about all OJJDP funding 
opportunities are encouraged to call

[[Page 71196]]

OJJDP's Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 800-638-8736 or visit OJJDP's 
Web site at www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org and click on ``Grants & Funding.''
    Consideration for continuation funding for an additional project 
period for previously funded discretionary grant programs was based on 
several factors, including the following:
     The extent to which the project responds to the applicable 
requirements of the JJDP Act.
     Responsiveness to OJJDP and Department of Justice FY 2000 
program priorities.
     Compliance with performance requirements of prior grant 
years.
     Compliance with fiscal and regulatory requirements.
     Compliance with any special conditions of the award.
     Availability of funds (based on appropriations and program 
priority determinations).
    In accordance with Section 262 (d)(1)(B) of the JJDP Act, as 
amended, 42 U.S.C. 5665a, the competitive process for the award of Part 
C funds is not required if the Administrator makes a written 
determination waiving the competitive process:
    1. With respect to programs to be carried out in areas in which the 
President declares under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act codified at 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. that a 
major disaster or emergency exists, or
    2. With respect to a particular program described in Part C that is 
uniquely qualified.

Summary of Public Comments on the Proposed Comprehensive Plan for 
Fiscal Year 2000

    OJJDP published its Proposed Comprehensive Plan for FY 2000 in the 
Federal Register (Vol. 64 , No. 199) on October 15, 1999, for a 45-day 
public comment period. OJJDP received 42 letters commenting on the 
Proposed Plan. Forty-one letters had one signature (although one of the 
single-signature letters provided comments from three law enforcement 
units). One letter was signed by two officials of an organization. All 
comments have been considered in the development of OJJDP's Final 
Comprehensive Plan for Fiscal Year 1999.
    Thirteen law enforcement officers, including police chiefs, 
deputies, and lieutenants, commented. (One of the law enforcement 
letters was from an individual with a tribal police department, and one 
was the director of research and development for the police 
department.) In related fields, OJJDP heard from one individual in 
corrections, one in probation, one in court evaluation, and one in a 
domestic violence agency. A psychologist wrote, as did the director of 
a psychiatric clinic and a professor of nursing. An associate school 
superintendent also wrote. Comments were received from an Assistant 
Commonwealth Attorney and from two individuals in State juvenile 
justice agencies. Thirteen persons who commented were associated with a 
variety of organizations, associations, agencies, and programs, and one 
vice president of a private firm provided comments. Four commenters did 
not mention any profession or affiliation.
    The writers expressed support for one or more of the 10 proposed 
priority areas, and several writers praised the list of 10 priority 
areas as a whole. Many of the commenters also wrote in support of 
prevention programming, and others expressed appreciation for OJJDP's 
publications and Web site. One or two writers supported one of several 
general programming areas, including truancy, teen courts, learning 
disabled youth in the juvenile justice system, capacity building, 
overrepresentation of minorities in the juvenile justice system, 
cooperation between police and the juvenile justice system, and mental 
health needs. Several writers expressed support for demonstration 
programs and training and technical assistance. Some writers indicated 
their interest in obtaining funding for their programs.
    All comments received are summarized below together with OJJDP's 
responses. Those writers who supported various new program areas were 
all told that their comments will be considered in the planning process 
for FY 2000 and beyond, but that the funding available for this fiscal 
year limits OJJDP's ability to support new programming. In other 
instances where more than one writer commented on a particular program 
or area of programming, to avoid needless repetition in this summary, 
after an initial response below, subsequent responses refer the reader 
to the first response on that topic.
    Comment: One writer, a law enforcement planner with a tribal police 
department, expressed concern that only one program in the Proposed 
Plan (the Tribal Youth Program) targeted American Indians. The writer 
noted that Indian Reservations are in rural areas and that most 
programs and services are located in cities and therefore not available 
to American Indian youth, who face a variety of problems, such as 
exposure to violence and child abuse, drugs, underage drinking, and 
violence in the schools and on the streets. ``Tribal resources to fund 
prevention and intervention activities,'' the writer indicated, ``are 
limited.'' The writer also stated that many tribes do not have the 
staff needed to prepare competitive grant applications and pointed out 
that, although the Proposed Plan mentions funds for technical 
assistance to tribes, no information was given as to how to contact the 
grantee, the American Indian Development Associates. Finally, the 
commenter asked if funds spent on ``numerous research, evaluation and 
data collection projects'' would not ``be better used in actual program 
implementation?''
    Response: OJJDP recognizes the severity of the issues facing Native 
American youth. A recent Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) 
publication, American Indians and Crime, provides some statistics that 
demonstrate the growing problem of violence and crime in Indian 
country, including the following:
     American Indians experience per capita rates of violence 
that are more than twice those of the U.S. resident population.
     Nearly a third of all American Indian victims of violence 
are between the ages of 18 and 24.
     The 1997 arrest rate among American Indians for alcohol-
related offenses (driving under the influence, liquor law violations, 
and public drunkenness) was more than double that found among all 
races.
    These and other data provided in the BJS report show the need for 
increased funding, resource enhancement, and infrastructure/capacity 
building within Indian country. Research is a critical factor in 
documenting the need for increased funding to tribes. By funding and 
conducting research and evaluation programs, we obtain valuable 
information about what works and about best practices in the areas of 
program development and effective approaches for working with tribes.
    OJJDP has had several funding opportunities for which all 
communities could apply, and, depending on the availability of funding, 
we expect to offer such opportunities again in the future. Examples of 
these programs include the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the SafeFutures 
initiative, Safe Start, Healthy Students/Safe Schools, and the Drug-
Free Communities Support Program, to name a few. Indian communities 
have applied for and been selected to participate in some of these 
programs. However, with the Tribal Youth Program, Congress for the 
first time appropriated funds to OJJDP solely for the American Indian 
community. This program is part of the joint U.S. Department of Justice 
(DOJ) and U.S.

[[Page 71197]]

Department of the Interior Indian Country Law Enforcement Initiative, 
which addresses the compelling need to improve law enforcement and the 
administration of criminal and juvenile justice in Indian country. It 
should be noted that no more than 10 percent of the Tribal Youth 
Program funds may be used for research.
    In addition to the Tribal Youth Program, there are several 
initiatives either in development or being implemented to address some 
of the issues that the writer raised. Three such initiatives are 
described briefly below:
     Native American Mental Health Initiative. A project of the 
White House's Domestic Policy Council designed to bring together 
several agencies within DOJ and the U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services (HHS) in an effort to provide services to American Indian 
country.
     Comprehensive Indian Resources for Community and Law 
Enforcement (CIRCLE). A project of the U.S. Attorney General that 
brings together several DOJ agencies to provide funding and resources 
to three pilot sites in Indian country.
     Substance Abuse. OJJDP and other Office of Justice 
Programs agencies are beginning discussions with the Center for 
Substance Abuse Treatment and the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention 
(within the HHS Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration) on working together to provide services, programs, and 
funding to Native Americans. These discussions are expected to lead to 
interagency collaboration and possibly result in joint funding 
opportunities.
    In addition to recognizing the obvious need in Indian country, 
OJJDP is also committed to providing training and technical assistance 
to tribes that have juvenile justice issues and programs. An OJJDP Fact 
Sheet (Training and Technical Assistance for Indian Nation Juvenile 
Justice Systems, FS 99105) provides information about the technical 
assistance available via OJJDP's grant with American Indian Development 
Associates. Copies of the Fact Sheet can be obtained by calling OJJDP's 
Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 800-638-8736 or by sending an e-mail 
request to [email protected]. The Fact Sheet is also available online 
at www.ncjrs.org/jjfact.htm#99105.
    OJJDP's response suggested that the writer might want to be put on 
the mailing list for OJJDP's program announcements by calling the 
Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 800-638-8736 or send an e-mail 
request to [email protected]. Program announcements are also posted 
online at www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org (click on ``Grants & Funding'').
    Most of OJJDP's funding is not provided under Parts C and D but is 
distributed to the States and territories through our Formula Grants, 
Challenge, and Title V (Community Prevention) programs. One example is 
the Native American Pass-Through Program. The Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention Act specifies that a portion of each State's 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Formula Grant program 
funding be made available to fund programs for Indian tribes. This 
allocation, known as the Native American Pass-Through Program, provides 
funds to Indian tribes to perform law enforcement functions pertaining 
to the custody of children and youth. Areas receiving funding include 
police efforts to prevent, control, and reduce crime and delinquency; 
apprehension of criminal and delinquent offenders; and activities of 
juvenile corrections, probation, or parole authorities. The minimum 
pass-through for FY 1998 was $358,842. This amount was allocated to 
Indian tribes in 36 States. Historically, in many States, the actual 
amount awarded to tribes by States far exceeds the statutorily required 
amount. The name, address, and telephone number of the Juvenile Justice 
Specialist for the writer's State were provided, so that the writer 
could pursue these possible sources of funding.
    Comment: A psychologist who works with juvenile offenders 
recommended that the plan include provisions for ``direct job placement 
services to help older juvenile offenders obtain and maintain 
employment.'' The writer suggested funding for either demonstration 
projects or research studies that could lead to more effective ways at 
helping this population find work.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's interest in job readiness 
training, placement, and retention for older juvenile offenders and 
shares his views that such activities are important in deterring 
delinquent activity and providing meaningful career opportunities for 
youth. Over the past 2 years, OJJDP has partnered with the U.S. 
Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration in the 
development of a comprehensive strategy to create education, training, 
and employment opportunities for at-risk and delinquent youth. 
Recently, the Department of Labor funded three sites to develop a model 
school-to-work education and job training curriculum in a correctional 
setting that emphasizes the importance of developing competency and 
life skills in a multitude of professions and providing the necessary 
support, advocacy, and followup upon a youth's return to the community. 
These sites are located in Florida, Ohio, and Indiana. OJJDP is 
providing the funding for a 12-month process evaluation and impact 
feasibility assessment at two of the three sites. It is intended that 
the comprehensive services developed under these grants will serve as 
models for other juvenile correctional facilities across the country.
    OJJDP is also collaborating with the Department of Labor's 
Employment and Training Administration across several other program 
areas:
     OJJDP and the Department of Labor have provided funding 
support to the Boys & Girls Clubs of America to implement the 
TeenSupreme Career Preparation Initiative. This program provides 
employment training and other related services to at-risk youth through 
41 local Boys and Girls Clubs.
     In order to encourage local communities to adapt best 
practices to improve the employability of at-risk and delinquent youth, 
the two departments are working toward having juvenile justice agencies 
represented on local youth councils. The Workforce Investment Act of 
1998 established local youth councils to guide the development and 
operation of programs for youth at the local level. Youth councils are 
composed of members of the local workforce investment boards and 
representatives of youth service agencies, local public housing 
authorities, parents of youth seeking assistance, youth, the Job Corps 
and others as deemed appropriate.
     The two departments are providing collaborative technical 
assistance to both youth employment programs and OJJDP programs that 
involve juvenile offenders and high-risk youth.
     A live satellite videoconference is planned for the coming 
year to disseminate information concerning the programs available 
throughout the country that address employment issues and court-
involved youth.
    OJJDP is committed to developing model programs that address these 
issues and is equally concerned with supporting evaluations of these 
efforts that will measure both process and outcome variables.
    Comment: An Assistant Commonwealth Attorney wrote in support of 
programming for three categories of offenders: female offenders, sex 
offenders, and status offenders, singling out programming for female 
offenders as the area he thought to be of primary concern in his

[[Page 71198]]

community. He also called for more emphasis on prevention. He indicated 
that before funding programs in Native American and Alaskan Native 
communities, OJJDP should ``strongly consider whether or not your 
programs are working in the rest of the country.'' The writer found the 
field-initiated research and evaluation programs ``too vague for 
comment'' and was unaware of ``many cases in our area involving lead or 
environmental hazards for children, although it is always important to 
do everything possible to protect children.'' Finally, the letter 
stated that OJJDP's focus should not be on research but on applying 
``some of the knowledge from research to treatment and prevention.''
    Response: OJJDP appreciates knowing the writer's view that, of the 
10 areas proposed for consideration for new programming, the need for 
programs for female offenders is the area of most concern to his 
community.
    In regard to the development of more programs and treatment for sex 
offenders, in FY 1998, OJJDP funded two projects designed to assess the 
feasibility of creating a juvenile sex offender typology based on 
national-level data. The researchers, one with the University of 
Baltimore, the other with the University of Virginia, each used a 
different method for typology construction. The University of Baltimore 
project relied on archival (information from official records) data, 
while the University of Virginia project used a combination of archival 
and prospective (interviews and questionnaire completed by juvenile sex 
offenders themselves) data.
    As a result of their feasibility studies, both researchers 
concluded that it would be possible to create a juvenile sex offender 
typology based on a large, national sample of juvenile sex offenders. 
Each researcher has therefore submitted a new proposal to create this 
typology, and these proposals are currently under peer review. The goal 
of creating such a typology is to identify different subgroups of 
juvenile sex offenders who may present different levels of risk and 
need. Some juvenile offenders, for example, may safely be placed in 
community-based programs, while others will require institutional 
placement. At present, the tools are not available to make these 
distinctions easily or well. Additionally, a comprehensive typology may 
facilitate better decisionmaking about which youth will benefit from 
which type(s) of treatment.
    OJJDP agrees with the writer's comment on the importance of 
prevention and treatment programs for status offenders. As noted in the 
Proposed Plan, prevention and treatment efforts at the early stages of 
delinquency are ``less expensive and more effective than efforts to 
change subsequent delinquent behavior.''
    In regard to the writer's statement that OJJDP's focus ``should not 
be on research,'' OJJDP responded that the Office is continually 
striving to attain the appropriate balance among three vital and 
interrelated elements of OJJDP's mission: research, demonstration 
projects, and training and technical assistance. OJJDP believes that 
the Proposed Plan achieved a reasonable apportioning of resources among 
these three elements.
    Comment: A chief of police wrote in support of prevention 
initiatives, such as programs to keep young people in school. The chief 
commented that parents who are ``victims of the social welfare system'' 
are likely to have children who will repeat their experience, and he 
offered specific suggestions for shoring up the welfare system. The 
chief also labeled the juvenile justice system ``inept'' and ``the 
major contributor to juvenile delinquency.''
    Response: OJJDP agrees that it is imperative to focus strongly on 
prevention, and believes that the Proposed Plan does reflect such an 
emphasis. From mentoring programs to programs that seek to prevent the 
use and abuse of alcohol and other drugs'and from violence prevention 
to early intervention programs, OJJDP is committed to supporting a 
comprehensive, communitywide approach as an effective way to promote 
healthy childhood development and address the problems affecting our 
youth. For example, collaborative efforts among OJJDP, the U.S. 
Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services are under way to address some of the very issues raised in the 
writer's letter regarding school attendance, societal influences, and 
family issues that contribute to the delinquency of our youth.
    Without directly responding to the writer's negative view of the 
juvenile justice system, OJJDP sent him information about current 
levels of juvenile crime and violence and the juvenile justice system 
response and about OJJDP's comprehensive approach to preventing and 
intervening with juvenile delinquency. One document was the recently 
released Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report, which 
includes up-to-date data and offers an indispensable resource for 
informed policy decisions that will shape the juvenile justice system 
in the 21st century. A brochure on OJJDP's Comprehensive Strategy for 
Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders was also provided. 
This brochure outlines a strategy that, when implemented, can provide 
appropriate prevention methods to children, families, and communities 
and intervene in the lives of first-time offenders with structured 
programs and services.
    Comment: An individual who works in State law enforcement training 
as a curriculum specialist suggested the need for more emphasis on 
interactive dialog and cooperation between police and juvenile justice 
agencies. He also indicated that OJJDP publications are valuable in his 
work.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's suggestion about the need 
for interactive dialog between police and juvenile justice agencies. 
The Department of Justice's Office of Community Oriented Policing 
Services (COPS) and OJJDP are sponsoring the Community Policing and 
Youth Study as part of our Youth Focused Community Policing program. 
This project is designed to assist the Department of Justice in 
planning youth and law enforcement issues. The project will provide 
communities across the country with current information on the 
innovative and promising practices of law enforcement agencies in 
addressing youth issues through community policing. Through this 
project, information will be developed and shared with the field 
through product dissemination, training and technical assistance, and a 
national conference in 2001.
    In addition to this study, OJJDP has sponsored the replication of a 
unique collaborative effort between the New Haven Department of Police 
Services and the Child Study Center at Yale University that addresses 
the psychological impact of chronic exposure to violence on children 
and families. The Child Development-Community Policing Program brings 
police and mental health professionals together to provide each other 
with training, consultation and support and to provide direct 
interdisciplinary interventions to children who are victims of or 
witnesses to violent crimes.
    Comment: A police chief wrote in support of teen courts, which he 
reports have been extremely successful in his county.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates learning of the success of teen courts 
in the writer's jurisdiction. In 1999, the National Youth Court Center 
was created by OJJDP and funded by the

[[Page 71199]]

Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants program, in 
collaboration with the U.S. Departments of Education, Health and Human 
Services, and Transportation. The National Youth Court Center at the 
American Probation and Parole Association and four affiliated agencies 
will offer training and technical assistance; develop products such as 
volunteer youth membership training materials, national guidelines on 
youth courts, and regional training programs; and provide a wide range 
of other services.
    Youth courts are the fastest growing crime prevention program in 
the country, with more than 650 youth court programs in 49 States at 
this time. Youth court programs provide swift and immediate sanctions 
for youth experiencing their first contact with the juvenile justice 
system.
    Most of OJJDP's funding is not provided under Parts C and D but is 
distributed to the States and territories through OJJDP's Formula 
Grants, Challenge, and Title V (Community Prevention) programs. OJJDP 
encouraged the writer to explore these possible sources of funding and 
referred him to the Juvenile Justice Specialist for his State.
    Comment: A police lieutenant wrote that OJJDP's 10 areas being 
considered for funding priorities are ``appropriate and worthy'' but 
suggested that another priority area be added: information exchange 
among a wide variety of human service providers. He also indicated that 
he found OJJDP's Web site and publications ``helpful and informative.''
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's support of the 10 program 
areas presented for consideration in the Proposed Plan and positive 
feedback about OJJDP's Web site and publications. OJJDP recognizes the 
importance of information exchange among a wide variety of human 
service providers.
    In regard to the need for additional emphasis on confidentiality in 
the Proposed Program plan, for several years the issue of information 
sharing and confidentiality has been at the foundation of many of the 
programs and activities supported by the Missing and Exploited 
Children's Program (MECP) and other components within OJJDP. As such, 
issues relating to confidentiality and information sharing are 
addressed throughout the many programs, activities, training, and 
technical assistance activities supported by OJJDP.
    MECP supports a number of training programs that focus on improving 
the systems response to missing and exploited children's issues. 
Several of these training programs are multidisciplinary in nature, 
requiring the participation of various agencies within a community. In 
addition to providing information on ways to improve the system's 
response to child sexual abuse and exploitation issues, topics relating 
to cooperation, interagency collaboration, information sharing, and 
confidentiality of juvenile records are addressed in these training 
sessions.
    Recognizing the complexity of this issue and its broad implications 
for the various components of the juvenile justice system, in June 
1997, OJJDP, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Education, 
published Sharing Information: A Guide to the Family Educational Rights 
and Privacy Act and Participation in Juvenile Justice Programs. This 
publication, which is available at no cost from OJJDP's Juvenile 
Justice Clearinghouse (800-638-8736), provides educators, law 
enforcement personnel, juvenile justice professionals, and community 
leaders with information to help them forge partnerships, improve 
information sharing, and enhance the operation and functioning of the 
juvenile justice system.
    In addition to these activities, OJJDP's Youth Focused Community 
Policing initiative is working with communities to help them tackle 
difficult issues relating to information sharing and confidentiality. 
OJJDP is preparing a Bulletin on information sharing, which should be 
ready early next year. In addition, OJJDP, in cooperation with the 
Department of Education, is currently developing a solicitation for an 
information-sharing training and technical assistance program. OJJDP 
provided the writer with information on how to be put on the mailing 
list for program announcements and how to access them online.
    Comment: An individual commented that behavior must have ``sure and 
swift'' consequences and that sanctions must be appropriate and timely.
    Response: To address these concerns, OJJDP described the 
comprehensive approach to juvenile delinquency that it has been 
pursuing for the past several years. Since OJJDP published the 
Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile 
Offenders in 1993, it has advocated that States, local governments, and 
communities adopt a research-based comprehensive strategy approach to 
address the problems of juvenile crime and victimization. OJJDP has 
synthesized decades of research and practice from practitioners and 
established a framework for implementing an effective juvenile justice 
system. Through support of research, demonstration programs, and 
training and technical assistance, OJJDP encourages States, local 
governments, and communities to use the Comprehensive Strategy to 
develop coordinated, community-wide approaches to preventing and 
intervening with juvenile delinquency and victimization. OJJDP focuses 
its support on programs and initiatives that further one or more of the 
basic principles of the Comprehensive Strategy:
     Strengthen families in their role of guiding, 
disciplining, and instilling sound values in their children.
     Support core social institutions and their role in 
supporting families and helping children develop to their maximum 
potential.
     Promote prevention strategies and activities that reduce 
the impact of negative (risk) factors and enhance the influence of 
positive (protective) factors in the lives of youth at greatest risk of 
delinquency.
     Intervene immediately and appropriately at the first signs 
of trouble in a child's life.
     Establish a system of graduated sanctions and a continuum 
of services, including aftercare, to respond appropriately to the needs 
of each juvenile offender.
     Protect the public from the most serious, violent, and 
chronic juvenile offenders by providing for their incapacitation while 
at the same time addressing their treatment needs.
    OJJDP believes that, as the Comprehensive Strategy and its 
principles are implemented in communities throughout the country, we 
will see a continued decline in juvenile violent crime, which has been 
decreasing for each of the past 4 years, and an increase in public 
safety and in the well-being of the Nation's youth.
    Comment: A deputy chief of police expressed concern that OJJDP's 
support for assessment centers focused exclusively on what he called 
``the Florida model.'' He urged OJJDP to look at other programs that 
may be as effective and that are designed for the local community.
    Response: OJJDP has supported the concept of assessment centers 
through its Community Assessment Center (CAC) demonstration effort. 
CAC's provide a 24-hour centralized point of intake and assessment for 
juveniles who have or are likely to come into contact with the juvenile 
justice system. The main purpose of a CAC is to facilitate earlier and 
more efficient prevention

[[Page 71200]]

and intervention service delivery at the ``front end'' of the juvenile 
justice system. OJJDP's CAC concept was not based on the Florida 
Juvenile Assessment Centers; it was developed from the Office's 
Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile 
Offenders.
    In FY 1997, two communities (Denver, CO, and Lee County, FL) began 
or enhanced their ongoing CAC planning process. Two additional 
communities with existing assessment centers (Jefferson County, CO, and 
Orlando, FL) also began enhancing their operations to become more 
consistent with OJJDP's CAC concept. The selection of the sites for 
this demonstration effort was not related to the implementation of the 
``Florida model'' but was directly related to the implementation of the 
CAC concept as outlined in OJJDP's concept paper Community Assessment 
Centers: A Discussion of the Concept's Efficacy. In addition, a 2-year 
independent evaluation of the funded projects was initiated, and a 
separate grantee began providing training and technical assistance to 
the project sites. OJJDP believed this program provided the opportunity 
to examine OJJDP's CAC concept, while allowing communities to customize 
it to their local needs.
    During the second year of the demonstration effort, a limited 
competition was held among the four CAC sites for increased funding to 
two sites to develop a fully operational CAC, including all four CAC 
conceptual elements. Although the Jefferson Center for Mental Health 
did not choose to apply for the increased funding to implement all four 
elements of OJJDP's concept, OJJDP provided funding for another 12 
months to further enhance the Jefferson County Assessment Center by 
conducting an intensive review of existing assessment tools and 
enhancing the case management process. The two sites that received 
increased funding to develop a fully operational CAC were Denver and 
Orlando.
    OJJDP sent the writer copies of the original concept paper, 
Community Assessment Centers: A Discussion of the Concept's Efficacy, 
the Fact-Finding Report on Community Assessment Centers, and a recent 
OJJDP Fact Sheet on CAC. As mentioned in the CAC Fact Sheet, OJJDP 
anticipates the publication of a CAC Bulletin in a few months. OJJDP 
referred the writer to the appropriate Program Manager for specific 
questions regarding OJJDP's CAC demonstration effort.
    Comment: One individual wrote in support of prevention programming 
such as teen centers and Neighborhood Watch.
    Response: OJJDP agrees with the writer's position on the importance 
of focusing on prevention and provided a brief summary of its 
Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile 
Offenders. (See detailed response: to the comment: on ``sure and 
swift'' consequences, above.)
    Comment: An official with the American Psychological Association 
expressed support for OJJDP's comprehensive and empirically based plan 
and its efforts to address critical concerns related to juvenile 
justice, delinquency prevention, and child maltreatment. The writer 
especially praised the emphasis on prevention and early intervention 
and lauded the 10 areas being considered for new programming. In regard 
to research needs, the writer suggested continued efforts in the areas 
of mental health, educational services for children within the juvenile 
justice system (including those with disabilities and those who are 
gifted and talented), and minority overrepresentation in the system. 
The letter also included specific recommendations for additional text 
to be added to the plan, generally consisting of references to cultural 
competence and mental health needs.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's expression of strong 
support for the Comprehensive Plan and shares his concern about the 
need to address issues of cultural competence. OJJDP explained how 
several of the writer's specific suggestions for changes will be 
incorporated into the Final Program Plan. These changes are reflected 
in the following paragraphs.

Introduction to Fiscal Year 2000 Program Plan (64 FR 56086, Nov. 
29, 1999)

    Goals three and four:
     OJJDP supports efforts in the area of corrections, 
detention, and community-based alternatives to preserve the public 
safety in a manner that serves the appropriate development and best use 
of secure detention and corrections options, while at the same time 
fostering the use of community-based programs for juvenile offenders 
that provide developmentally appropriate, culturally competent mental 
health and other critical services.
     OJJDP seeks to support law enforcement, public safety, and 
other justice agency efforts to prevent juvenile delinquency, intervene 
in the development of chronic delinquent careers, and collaborate with 
the juvenile justice system to meet the needs of dependent, neglected, 
and abused children, children who need mental health interventions, and 
children with disabilities.

Sentence 3 Under ``Public Safety and Law Enforcement'' (64 FR 
56086, Nov. 29, 1999)

    Funds would also be provided to a partnership between youth and 
health and mental health agencies to continue school-based activities 
and efforts to address the effects on children of exposure to domestic 
violence.
    OJJDP did not include the writer's recommended changes for new 
program areas because funding restraints have limited the Office's 
ability to consider new programming and thus it would serve no purpose 
to modify the areas of interest this year. OJJDP assured the writer 
that his concerns will be given serious consideration in the planning 
process for FY 2001.
    Comment: A lieutenant in a sheriff's office commented that he would 
like to see more sex offender programs, more burglary reduction 
efforts, and more violence prevention programs for the juvenile 
population. He also called for strengthening public education efforts 
with all juveniles.
    Response: OJJDP described its programming efforts that focus on 
preventing and intervening with serious violent offending, particularly 
those that further one or more of the principles outlined in the 
Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile 
Offenders. (See earlier, detailed response to the comment on ``sure and 
swift'' consequences.)
    Comment: An officer with a private nonprofit agency working in the 
area of substance abuse assessments and treatment found all 10 broad 
programming areas relevant to her agency but singled out 5 top 
priorities (listed in order): status offender programs; female offender 
programs; ``blueprint'' program development, replication, and 
evaluation; improvements in sanctioning; and sex offender programs. 
While recognizing the usefulness of research and development, the 
writer would give higher priority to demonstrations and training and 
technical assistance. The commenter described OJJDP's Web site as a 
useful resource but noted that materials mailed by OJJDP did not always 
arrive in a timely fashion.
    Response: In the area of research and development versus 
demonstrations and training and technical assistance, OJJDP is 
continually striving to attain the appropriate balance among these 
three vital and interrelated elements of OJJDP's mission and believes 
that the Proposed Plan did achieve a reasonable

[[Page 71201]]

apportioning of resources among research, demonstrations, and training 
and technical assistance.
    OJJDP appreciates the writer's positive feedback on the usefulness 
of the Office's Web site as well as her concern about the mailing 
delays she has experienced in receiving information from OJJDP. The 
Office will try to identify any possible problem that may be causing 
the delays she has encountered in receiving OJJDP mailings.
    Comment: The vice president of a private firm strongly supported 
one of OJJDP's 10 broad areas being considered for new program funding. 
The ninth area (prevention and treatment programs for status 
offenders), according to the writer, is one that should be reviewed to 
see what progress has been made and to identify best practices that 
help divert status offenders from the juvenile corrections system. The 
commenter also approved of OJJDP's renewed emphasis on school truancy, 
which ``can influence a child's path toward delinquency.''
    Response: OJJDP appreciates learning of the writer's support for 
developing prevention and treatment programs for status offenders. 
OJJDP agrees that this is an important area of work and has been 
pleased by both the positive response from the field and the work 
already under way in this area as part of the Office's ongoing 
programs.
    With regard to school truancy and its effect on children, OJJDP is 
in the process of evaluating truancy reduction projects in eight 
demonstration sites: Athens, GA; Contra Costa, CA; Honolulu, HI; 
Houston, TX; Jacksonville, FL; King County, WA; Suffolk County, NY; and 
Tacoma, WA. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine how community 
collaboration can impact truancy reduction and lead to systemic reform 
and assist OJJDP in the development of a community collaborative 
truancy reduction program model.
    Comment: A manager of a gender-specific program in juvenile 
correctional services encouraged OJJDP to take a leadership role on 
programs for female juvenile offenders, particularly in locating and 
funding a model program, with guidelines for staffing and training. The 
individual expressed appreciation for OJJDP grants, site evaluations, 
training opportunities, and publications.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's comments on the proposed 
priority area of programming for female juvenile offenders and is 
pleased to learn that OJJDP funding has been beneficial to the youth 
served at the Rhode Island Training School.
    OJJDP noted that at the present time it is addressing some of the 
important issues raised in the letter through its training and 
technical assistance co-agreement with Greene, Peters, and Associates 
and Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. For example, OJJDP plans 
include the following:
     Developing and piloting training curriculums for 
decisionmakers and entry- to mid-level staff.
     Offering ``training of trainers'' courses to staff with 
training responsibilities in their jurisdictions to ensure quality and 
consistency of the training approach and design. (Selection will be 
made through a competitive application process.)
     Developing and piloting an advanced training series on 
emerging topic-specific gender issues affecting adolescent girls.
     Establishing a Web site with a capacity for delivering 
timely information on trends and challenges in juvenile justice to aid 
policymakers and program staff in improving gender programming in their 
jurisdictions.
     Recruiting, orienting, and managing a diverse cadre of 
consultants able to address the training and technical assistance needs 
of those who work with girls.
     Developing an educational media package for use by 
community leaders, agency staff, and decisionmakers to build awareness 
of gender-specific issues.
    Comment: The director of a psychiatric institute and clinic wrote 
that there is a need to enhance the quality of research and program 
evaluations in the area of juvenile sex offending. The writer 
encouraged OJJDP to make considerable funding available to conduct 
field-initiated research and evaluation programs in this field.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's thoughtful comments on the 
importance of addressing the problem of juvenile sex offending and 
support for more programs and treatment in this area. For a detailed 
description of OJJDP's work in this area, readers should refer to the 
earlier response to the comment from the Assistant Commonwealth 
Attorney.
    While OJJDP agreed that field-initiated research and evaluation 
programs offer the potential to expand knowledge of juvenile offending 
and develop methods to assess and treat these types of problems, 
funding available for this fiscal year will impact the Office's ability 
to support new programming under Parts C and D.
    Comment: The director of public policy in an organization that 
provides comprehensive youth development programming to school-age 
girls wrote that the ``increased general level of domestic violence, 
violence in the media, and the apparent increasing tolerance for 
violence in society'' should be addressed in the new program area 
focusing on female offenders. The writer proposed that in the program 
description ``unique needs'' of female offenders be changed to 
``additional needs'' of female offenders and suggested that when 
specifying these needs OJJDP should include ``sexual abuse, teen 
pregnancy, and responsibility for their children.'' Because a high 
proportion of status offenders are females, this individual suggested 
that OJJDP develop prevention and early intervention programs in a 
gender-sensitive manner, with recognition of the additional needs of 
young women. Lastly, the writer expressed surprise that OJJDP is 
planning to fund capacity building to help a program ``establish itself 
in an already crowded field.''
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's specific comments and 
suggestions on 2 of the 10 programming areas presented for 
consideration in the Program Plan: those dealing with female offenders 
and prevention and treatment programs for status offenders. In regard 
to using ``additional'' instead of ``unique'' to describe the needs of 
female juvenile offenders in the description of the proposed new 
program area, the descriptions of the 10 program areas included for 
consideration for new funding in the Proposed Plan are not being 
repeated in the Final Plan. However, in future documents addressing 
this issue, OJJDP will reword the phrase to read ``additional and 
unique needs'' of female juvenile offenders. The writer also 
recommended that OJJDP acknowledge the responsibility of single 
parenthood many female offenders are faced with. OJJDP believes this is 
important and provided the writer with copies of two OJJDP Fact Sheets 
that discuss adolescent motherhood and responsible fatherhood.
    OJJDP agreed with the writer's position that prevention and early 
intervention programs should be developed in a gender-sensitive manner, 
with full recognition of the additional needs that young women often 
carry. OJJDP is funding a program in Cook County, IL, that is directed 
at juvenile female offenders. The county has developed gender-specific 
needs, strengths, and risk assessments for juvenile female offenders; 
provided training in implementing gender-appropriate programming; and 
designed a pilot program with a community-

[[Page 71202]]

based continuum of care and a unique case management system. OJJDP 
hopes to see this approach replicated across the country.
    OJJDP noted the writer's disagreement with its plans to fund 
America's Promise. It is true that there are many such organizations in 
existence, but OJJDP believes that, when possible, it is worth 
supporting organizations that are in a unique position to mobilize and 
energize communities and provide role models for young people. As part 
of its commitment to this effort, OJJDP chairs the Public/Private 
Mentoring Alliance, which is composed of Federal and private 
organizations involved in mentoring. OJJDP looks forward to working 
with a number of alliances and groups in the coming year in an effort 
to help young people develop into healthy, productive adults.
    Comment: The assistant coordinator of a project that addresses the 
need for gender-specific programs for female juveniles wrote about the 
program's goals and stated that OJJDP's support will assist the program 
to continue their work with female juvenile offenders.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates learning about the writer's Girls 
Advocacy Project and support for the Office's continued work in the 
area of developing and studying programs addressing female offenders. 
OJJDP is supporting several projects that address the unique needs of 
female offenders. In 1996, OJJDP awarded a grant to design pilot 
training and technical assistance resources for entry-level staff in 
detention and correctional facilities, social service agencies, and 
youth-serving organizations responsible for working with female 
juvenile offenders or those at high risk of offending. This training 
will help improve gender programming services in many jurisdictions.
    Most of OJJDP's funding is not provided under Parts C and D, but is 
distributed to the States and territories through the Formula Grants, 
Challenge, and Title V (Community Prevention) programs. OJJDP provided 
the writer with contact information for the Juvenile Justice Specialist 
in his State to explore these possible sources of funding.
    Comment: The commissioner for a State juvenile justice agency wrote 
that OJJDP should perhaps focus on the target age population most at 
risk for offending, rather than early childhood prevention programs 
(citing the OJJDP priority to reduce lead and environmental hazards) 
that could be served by the U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services. The writer also stated that there is a need for opportunities 
for major Federal agencies to partner for children and that it would be 
extremely helpful to have Federal assistance and support for efforts to 
build community mobilization efforts. The writer considers status 
offenders to be an ongoing priority area in his State and asked that 
OJJDP take a leadership role in this area. Lastly, this individual 
wrote that OJJDP could be far more effective in providing technical 
assistance and suggested an alternative approach for responding to such 
requests.
    Response: OJJDP agrees that Federal assistance can be helpful to 
communities seeking to ``grow capacity.'' OJJDP is involved in 
extensive capacity-building efforts, particularly through its training 
and technical assistance programs, projects, and activities.
    Including the reduction of lead and environmental hazards as one 
OJJDP's program priorities for consideration fits within the Office's 
strong emphasis on prevention activities. This Administration has 
aggressively pursued interagency partnerships in crossover areas of 
interest, and it is clear that the effects of elevated levels of lead 
in the bloodstream can cause children to suffer from physical, 
neurobiological, and cognitive problems that may lead to aberrant 
behavior, including aggression and delinquency.
    With respect to the writer's concern regarding the provision of 
technical assistance, OJJDP has recently awarded a contract to operate 
the Formula Grants Training and Technical Assistance Program to 
Developmental Associates, Inc. (DA). The transition from the previous 
technical assistance provider, Community Research Associates, is now 
complete. The mission of OJJDP's partnership with DA continues to be 
the effective and expedient delivery of technical assistance to States 
and local agencies for implementing the provisions of the comprehensive 
State Plan. OJJDP will continue to explore the most efficient manner to 
provide States and local agencies technical assistance in a wide 
variety of policy and program areas dealing with planning and 
evaluation, delinquency prevention, diversion and early intervention, 
secure detention and alternatives to it use, corrections, graduated 
sanctions, and other specialized priorities delineated in the Juvenile 
Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act.
    Comment: A deputy director of public safety wrote that the programs 
most worthy of funding are those that ``demonstrate success upon which 
other financially assisted departments could build.'' He also 
acknowledged three areas of OJJDP's focus that would provide the most 
benefits to his community: Developing Blueprint Programs Through 
Replication and Evaluation, Developing Prevention and Treatment 
Programs for Status Offenders, and Supporting Field-Initiated Research 
and Evaluation Programs.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates learning which programming areas 
presented for consideration in the Program Plan would, in the writer's 
view, be most beneficial to the his community. OJJDP agreed that these 
are particularly important areas of work and has been pleased by both 
the positive response from the field and the work already under way in 
these areas as part of the Office's ongoing programs.
    Comment: The associate executive director of a child-and family-
focused agency expressed appreciation for OJJDP publications. Although 
agreeing that the program priorities in the Proposed Plan were 
appropriate, the writer identified the following additional areas for 
more OJJDP attention: family violence--focus on family prevention 
strategies; early childhood violence and primary prevention alcohol/
drug prevention models; violence prevention in schools--alternatives to 
suspension for ``zero tolerance'' policies; and models for early 
identification of troubled youth. This individual supported funding 
demonstration projects and program evaluations and encouraged OJJDP to 
sponsor training events. Lastly, the writer indicated that direct 
Federal discretionary grants to community programs is a better 
opportunity than block grant funding.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's positive feedback on its 
priority areas and its publications program and noted that information 
dissemination will remain a priority for the Office. During FY 1999, 
OJJDP produced more than 90 documents and distributed almost 4 million 
publications. During FY 1999, the OJJDP home page received almost 
750,000 ``hits.'' The site is continually updated with ``subpages'' 
highlighting specific OJJDP programs to provide users with the most 
current information.
    With regard to the writer's comment on block grant funding, both 
the Congress and OJJDP seek to establish a balance between State and 
local block and formula grant funding and categorical discretionary 
grants. Block and formula grants allow States and local communities to 
meet priority problems and needs identified through planning efforts 
that are suggested through Federal research, evaluation, training and 
technical assistance, and

[[Page 71203]]

information resources. Innovation and expansion of services are 
hallmarks of these programs. Discretionary grants provide an 
opportunity to meet national needs through demonstration and 
replication programs. Demonstration programs are based on research and 
seek to determine whether program models are effective in a variety of 
settings. Replications establish proven effective programs in 
communities across the country. OJJDP believes that this is currently 
an appropriate balance of these program types.
    Comment: A chief of police wrote in support of OJJDP's funding 
priority areas and expressed the need for more programs that assist law 
enforcement officers who must process juvenile offenders and more 
information for those officers processing juvenile offenders who commit 
serious offenses. The writer stated that enhanced training and 
technical assistance from OJJDP would be of greater benefit to the law 
enforcement community than research and development. He also indicated 
that his department made use of OJJDP's Web site.
    Response: OJJDP is pleased to learn that each of the 10 programming 
areas listed as priorities in the Program Plan were relevant to the 
writer's agency. OJJDP noted the writer's comment on the importance of 
enhanced training and technical assistance for the law enforcement 
community, especially in the area of interagency computer network 
access.
    OJJDP also appreciated hearing that the Crime Analysis/Planning and 
Research Division in the writer's department uses the Office's Web site 
to stay informed about grants and publications. The OJJDP home page is 
an important dissemination tool, and it is continually updated with 
``subpages'' on specific programs to provide users with the most 
current information.
    Comment: An adult probation and parole supervisor wrote in support 
of partnerships between juvenile justice and the Department of 
Education and discussed the necessity for both departments to adopt 
prevention efforts for students with learning disabilities.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's comments about the need 
for juvenile justice and education agencies to work together to address 
the needs of learning disabled youth. OJJDP and the U.S. Department of 
Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, 
recently awarded a grant to the University of Maryland to establish a 
new Center for Students with Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice 
System. The Secretary of Education and the Attorney General expect this 
project to have a significant impact on the improvement of services for 
students with disabilities in the justice system. Improvements in the 
areas of prevention, educational services, and reintegration based on a 
combination of research, training, and technical assistance will lead 
to improved results for children and youth with disabilities. The 
Center will provide guidance and assistance to States, schools, justice 
programs, families, and communities on designing, implementing, and 
evaluating comprehensive education programs. These programs will be 
based on research-validated practices for students with disabilities in 
the juvenile justice system. OJJDP referred the writer to the 
appropriate contacts for more information about the Center.
    Comment: A professor of nursing wrote to support the priorities for 
funding, particularly field-initiated research. The writer described an 
interdisciplinary, university-based research and service program that 
features home visitation and support group intervention. She also 
stated that it is imperative for university-based programs developed in 
collaboration with communities to have the ability to compete for OJJDP 
funding.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates hearing the writer's support for the 10 
broad priority areas for new funding in the Proposed Plan and of her 
particular interest in funding for field-initiated research. OJJDP 
thanked the writer for providing articles describing the success of the 
Project Healthy Grandparents program that supports positive development 
in children. OJJDP suggested that the writer watch for program 
announcements on OJJDP's Web site during the coming months for possible 
funding opportunities from funding streams other than those that 
support programs under Parts C and D of the JJDP Act.
    Comment: The director of a youth services organization wrote in 
support of funding prevention programs for youth and commented on the 
usefulness of OJJDP services, publications, and national statistics.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates hearing that its publications with 
national statistics and information on juvenile justice issues help the 
writer to shape programs on a local level. One of OJJDP's most recent 
publications, Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report, 
provides a comprehensive overview of juvenile crime, violence, and 
victimization and the response of the juvenile justice system. It 
illustrates OJJDP's efforts to make critical information available to 
local and national juvenile justice policymakers and community leaders.
    Disseminating information about research, statistics, and programs 
that work has been, and remains, a priority at OJJDP. During FY 1999, 
OJJDP produced more than 90 documents and distributed almost 4 million 
publications. OJJDP referred the writer to its Web site 
(www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org) for more information about the National Report 
and other OJJDP publications.
    Comment: A mental health advocate wrote to support OJJDP's 
publications, its Web site, and particularly its ``fax on demand'' 
service.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates hearing that its publications program 
is helpful. As noted above, disseminating quality information continues 
to be a priority and several OJJDP publications have won national 
awards. OJJDP encouraged the writer to access other electronic 
resources besides the ``fax-on-demand'' service, including OJJDP's 
electronic mailing list, JUVJUST, and the Office's recently redesigned 
Web site (www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org). JUVJUST alerts subscribers to new 
documents, funding opportunities, and other OJJDP news.
    Comment: An individual suggested that OJJDP develop a set of 
``value-screens'' and provided mathematical instructions on how 
decisions should be made. The writer provided a list of priorities in 
order of importance based on his intuition and another list based on a 
matrix of values, using the value-screen method.
    Response: OJJDP is intrigued by the writer's idea about using 
value-screens for decisionmaking and noted that the information would 
be passed along to the program planning team for their consideration.
    Comment: An individual wrote to share his personal priorities, 
including getting parents-- especially fathers--involved with their 
children, extending services for children from childhood to young 
adulthood, sharing news/information about children in other States with 
children across the country, providing summer activities for students, 
and developing community centers/sports for youth.
    Response: OJJDP believes that its proposed program priorities for 
FY 2000 reflect a commitment to prevention activities similar to the 
personal priorities shared in the comment letter. OJJDP provided the 
writer with a recent OJJDP Fact Sheet on the topic of responsible 
fatherhood.
    Comment: A police sergeant identified five areas that he believes 
would have the most direct impact on his jurisdiction, including 
improvement of the juvenile sanctioning system;

[[Page 71204]]

programs for female offenders; developing, evaluating, and replicating 
blueprint programs; juvenile sex offending; and prevention and 
treatment programs for status offenders. The writer indicated that it 
is important to fund new and innovative programs, but provision of 
enhanced training and technical assistance should not be overlooked.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates learning of the five program areas that 
would have the most impact in the writer's jurisdiction. OJJDP agreed 
that these are important areas of work and has been pleased by both the 
positive response to them from the field and the work already under way 
in these areas as part of the Office's ongoing programs.
    OJJDP appreciates the positive feedback about the Office's training 
seminars and agrees with the writer's statement that providing enhanced 
training and technical assistance to juvenile justice practitioners is 
essential. OJJDP will continue to keep this activity a priority.
    Comment: The executive director for an agency that provides support 
to families of incarcerated persons wrote about the need for attention 
to youth who have an immediate family member in prison. The writer 
indicated that mentoring programs are not reaching this population of 
youth and that they are particularly at high risk for incarceration 
themselves as juveniles.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's sharing information about 
her program and agrees with the need for prevention programs that 
address the issues she raises. In all of OJJDP's efforts, consistent 
with the OJJDP Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic 
Juvenile Offenders, emphasis is placed on risk-focused prevention. The 
youth referenced in the letter, assuming that there are other 
community, individual, peer and/or family-related risk factors present, 
are definitely considered at risk and are recommended for priority 
targeting in any OJJDP-supported program.
    OJJDP advised the writer that most of OJJDP's funding is not 
provided under Parts C and D, but is distributed to the States and 
territories through our Formula Grants, Challenge, and Title V 
(Community Prevention) programs. OJJDP provided the writer with contact 
information for the Juvenile Justice Specialist in her State to explore 
these possible sources of funding.
    With regard to funding for mentoring programs, Part G of the 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (JJDP) Act of 1974, as 
amended, authorizes OJJDP to fund a Juvenile Mentoring Program (JUMP). 
In fiscal year 2000, Congress appropriated $12 million to support this 
program, including demonstration projects, technical assistance, 
evaluation, and support for other specific programs such as the Big 
Brothers Big Sisters program. The goal of the JUMP program is to reduce 
juvenile delinquency and gang participation by at-risk youth, to 
improve academic performance of at-risk youth, and to reduce the 
dropout rate for at-risk youth through the establishment of one-to-one 
mentoring between an adult and a juvenile. OJJDP encouraged the writer 
to consider submitting an application for a forthcoming competitive 
solicitation the Office will issue in early 2000 to fund additional 
mentoring sites around the country.
    Comment: The executive director of the agency designated to 
administer a State's OJJDP funds wrote in support of the OJJDP Plan's 
broad view and its programs tailored to specific needs of special 
populations, including status offenders, female offenders, and Native 
American young people, with an emphasis on research and evaluation. The 
writer expressed the need for programs that address the mental health 
needs of young people and aftercare programs for juveniles leaving the 
system.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's positive comments about 
the work of the Office. With regard to meeting the mental health needs 
of youth in the juvenile justice system, the writer was provided with a 
copy of an OJJDP Fact Sheet entitled Mental Health Disorders and 
Substance Abuse Problems Among Juveniles. OJJDP intends to keep mental 
health needs of juveniles at the forefront as new programs are 
developed within the juvenile justice system. In the near future, OJJDP 
will release a new competitive solicitation for a multiyear research 
and development effort to examine current research and theoretical 
literature on mental health and related substance abuse issues among 
juvenile offenders.
    OJJDP has committed extensive resources in the area of aftercare/
reintegration services for juvenile offenders. Since 1987, OJJDP has 
supported a long-term research, demonstration, and testing project 
focused on aftercare. The Intensive Aftercare Program (IAP) model has 
evolved from this research. The goal of the IAP model is to reduce 
recidivism among high-risk parolees. The model assumes that effective 
intervention requires not only intensive supervision and services 
following institutional release, but also a focus on reintegration 
during incarceration. In addition, the IAP proposes a highly structured 
and gradual transitional process that serves as a bridge between 
institutionalization and aftercare. An independent outcome evaluation 
will examine recidivism using a followup period of 1 year after release 
from the institution and multiple measures of reoffending behavior. 
These measures will include arrest, arrest with adjudication, and days 
to recidivism. OJJDP is sharing its interim findings with the Attorney 
General's ``reentry court'' project team. The writer was provided 
copies of relevant OJJDP publications on the topic of aftercare.
    In addition to the IAP, OJJDP has been collaborating with the Boys 
& Girls Clubs of America to implement a pilot project known as 
``Targeted Reintegration.'' This project is an effort to provide Boys & 
Girls Club services to youth in residential placement and, upon their 
reentry to the community, to encourage youth to become involved in 
activities sponsored by the Boys & Girls Clubs. Once released, youth 
are provided a mentor through the Boys & Girls Club, are seen by their 
parole officer, and are expected to attend a Boys & Girls Club at least 
three times a week.
    Comment: The director for policy advocacy for a faith-based 
organization that is part of the Boston Ten Point Coalition and that 
works on gang prevention and intervention, youth crime, and delinquency 
wrote that to his knowledge, only one faith-based organization (FBO) is 
receiving direct funding from OJJDP. The writer provided suggestions 
for how OJJDP might help ``to get more FBO's eligible for OJJDP 
funding.'' This individual indicated that his organization has been 
doing much work with at-risk girls and OJJDP should consider FBO's as 
possible recipients of these grants. Faith-based organizations are also 
providing arts programs, and the writer would like funding expanded to 
include cultural education curriculums offered by such organizations to 
incarcerated and at-risk youth.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's interest in seeing greater 
involvement of faith-based organizations in gang prevention and 
intervention and other youth delinquency programs. OJJDP further 
requested the writer's assistance in enhancing the Office's current 
mailing list to include a special tier of faith-based organizations and 
provided the appropriate agency staff contact to start a dialog on this 
matter.
    As to direct funding, OJJDP informed the writer that it is 
currently providing

[[Page 71205]]

funding to faith-based Juvenile Mentoring Program (JUMP) sites. In 
addition, to be eligible for OJJDP's Drug-Free Communities program, 
applicants had to ``demonstrate that a community coalition has been 
established,'' containing at least one representative of several 
specified groups, including ``religious or fraternal organizations.''
    OJJDP supports the work being done by the Ten Point Coalition and 
looks forward to joining the ongoing discussions within the U.S. 
Department of Justice to help promote the good work the Coalition is 
doing.
    The writer's comments concerning FBO's, arts programs for 
incarcerated youth, and programs for female offenders will all be 
considered in OJJDP's planning process for FY 2000 and beyond.
    Comment: The directors of program development and research for a 
law enforcement agency wrote to suggest modification of the plan to 
incorporate projects that develop the role of community policing for 
the prevention and reduction of juvenile crime. The writers suggested 
three projects that would further these efforts: a publication series 
that would educate law enforcement personnel as to the potential of 
community-oriented approaches to juvenile crime, demonstration projects 
modeled after the faith-based approach initiated in Boston by the Ten 
Point Coalition working in cooperation with police departments, and the 
development of evaluation of efforts that expand on the school-based 
problem-solving model.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writers' thoughtful and insightful 
synopses of the three project areas that would further the role of 
community policing in juvenile crime reduction and prevention. OJJDP is 
particularly excited about the work being done by the Ten Point 
Coalition and is involved in ongoing discussions about promoting work 
in the juvenile justice area by faith-based organizations. OJJDP looks 
forward to continuing its dialog with the Police Executive Research 
Forum concerning the areas of interest they raised in their letter.
    Comment: Three units within a police department reviewed OJJDP's 
plan and provided comments. The commander of the investigative services 
unit indicated that equal priority and emphasis should be given to 
research, practical application, and training for intervening 
professionals and to continuation and growth of a national resource 
center for safe schools that could provide technical assistance, 
research, and information. The supervisor of the sex crimes unit noted 
an increase in juveniles involved in sexual offenses and would like a 
focus on the impact of pornography films and VCR's on these offenses. 
He also is concerned about child victims not showing up for court and 
suggests that OJJDP investigate why this happens and how often. A 
supervisor of a gang squad listed, in order of priority, the areas that 
he thinks could be implemented by his department: juvenile crime 
trends; field-initiated research and evaluation programs; developing, 
replicating, and evaluating model programs; prevention and treatment 
programs for status offenders; and improving the juvenile sanctions 
system. This individual listed programs that he believes should be 
given consideration in his community and suggested future studies and 
research in the following areas: transient and migrating gangs; Asian 
gang factions; skinhead/white supremacist factions of gangs; 
coordination of a national strategy to identify and combat these 
criminal groups, including immigration issues, teamed with State, 
Federal, and local authorities; and studies and research into the 
sources of firearms used in violent crimes.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates hearing comments from the 
representatives of the police department units and their suggestions 
for directing OJJDP programming resources. OJJDP acknowledged the 
concern about the nationwide incidents of school violence and the need 
for training and technical assistance on the issue. OJJDP plans to 
continue funding the National Resource Center for Safe Schools in 
Portland, OR, which produces a number of training and technical 
assistance materials to combat this issue. OJJDP also promised to look 
into the questions raised about trends in the increase of Part II sex 
offenses and the number of child abuse cases dropped. A representative 
from the Office's Research and Program Development Division will 
respond to the commenter directly on those issues. Finally, OJJDP noted 
the five programming areas judged as having the most impact on the 
writers' department and agreed with their importance. The Office has 
been pleased by the positive response from the field about the work 
already under way in these areas as part of its ongoing programs.
    Finally, in response to the need for continued emphasis to combat 
juvenile gangs, OJJDP reaffirmed that gang prevention, intervention, 
and suppression remains one of the Office's highest priorities. OJJDP 
appreciates the positive comments about its National Youth Gang Center 
as well as interest in its Gang-Free Communities Initiative, which will 
likely entail a replication of the OJJDP Comprehensive Gang Model in 
multiple U.S. cities. Early evaluation data from the five existing 
demonstration sites indicate promising preliminary evaluation results 
in terms of reducing gang crime, violence, drug use, and drug sales. 
OJJDP is excited about the possibility of replicating this model with 
local adaptations around the country. OJJDP acknowledged the comment 
that many communities lack good research on intervening with migratory 
gangs of various ethnicities and on white supremacist/skinhead groups.
    Comment: The program director of a military academy that works with 
at-risk youth wrote to suggest the use of intervention and education to 
positively impact youth's behaviors. The writer noted that there is a 
lack of programs for middle and high school students and for youth who 
are marginally involved in the juvenile justice system. Information 
about the academy's program, which includes elements of mentoring, was 
provided. The writer closed with a request that OJJDP look into this 
type of program.
    Response: OJJDP noted that the writer's program fulfills a need to 
support youth at risk of entering the juvenile justice system or youth 
who have marginally been involved with the juvenile justice system and 
agreed that there is a need to address these youth. OJJDP provided a 
brief summary of its comprehensive approach and sent the writer a copy 
of its Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic 
Juvenile Offenders, which lists a variety of model intermediate 
sanctions programs that provide structure, education, and leadership 
training to youth. (See the detailed response to the comment on ``sure 
and swift'' consequences above for more information about the 
Comprehensive Strategy.)
    Most of OJJDP's funding is not provided under Parts C and D, but is 
distributed to the States and territories through Formula Grants, 
Challenge, and Title V (Community Prevention) programs. OJJDP provided 
contact information for the writer's State Juvenile Justice Specialist 
to explore these possible sources of funding and an agency contact for 
more information about the Office's programs.
    Comment: A law enforcement officer wrote that field-initiated 
research and evaluation is most important and that there is a need for 
the development, replacement, and evaluation of model ``blueprint'' 
programs and for model practices in delinquency and dependency courts. 
The writer also expressed a need for facilities for

[[Page 71206]]

troubled youth and for appropriate sanctions for their actions. 
Finally, there is a need for prevention and treatment programs for 
status offenders.
    Response: OJJDP is actively engaged in advancing the program areas 
raised by the writer. OJJDP will pass on the writer's concerns about 
the issues facing his jurisdiction to the Office's program planning 
team for their consideration.
    Comment: The director of a truancy center described the program's 
approach, including targeting of middle school-age children and 
younger, to enhance successful intervention. The program works closely 
with probation, counselors, judges, law enforcement, school 
administrators, social workers, and parents to provide coordinated 
services and case management. The writer asks that OJJDP recognize the 
center's approach as ``unique and worthy of consideration'' during 
evaluation and prioritization of funding activities. He also indicated 
the two programming areas that would be most useful in his work.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates learning that, of the 10 programming 
areas presented for consideration in the Program Plan, two--
``blueprint'' program development and prevention and treatment programs 
for status offenders--would best serve the writer's needs.
    In response to the writer's description of his truancy program, 
OJJDP acknowledged truancy as a major problem in this country that 
negatively influences the future of youth and costs taxpayers thousands 
of dollars. OJJDP is in the process of evaluating truancy reduction 
projects in eight demonstration sites: Athens, GA; Contra Costa, CA; 
Honolulu, HI; Houston, TX; Jacksonville, FL; King County, WA; Suffolk 
County, NY; and Tacoma, WA. The purpose of the evaluation is to 
determine how community collaboration can impact truancy reduction and 
lead to systemic reform and assist OJJDP in the development of a 
community collaborative truancy reduction program model.
    Most of OJJDP's funding is not provided under Parts C and D, but is 
distributed to the States and territories through our Formula Grants, 
Challenge, and Title V (Community Prevention) programs. OJJDP referred 
the writer to his State Juvenile Justice Specialist to explore these 
possible sources of funding.
    Comment: The program coordinator of a court evaluation unit wrote 
in support of three of the proposed priority areas: developing and 
studying programs addressing female offenders, developing prevention 
and treatment programs for status offenders, and developing and 
evaluating model practices regarding the efficacy of delinquency and 
dependency courts. The writer also noted that ``prevention and initial 
treatment is often a less costly approach to addressing delinquent 
behavior.''
    Response: OJJDP appreciates learning of the writer's choice of 
priority program areas and strongly agrees with the observation about 
the cost-effectiveness of prevention and initial treatment.
    Comment: The domestic violence coordinator at a county agency wrote 
that OJJDP needs to more directly address the problem of gender 
violence, specifically male to female violence, and to include school 
violence programs that consider the violence directed at girls, not 
just gang or gun violence. The writer also stated that ``young men are 
assaulting others in their families, but especially their mothers.'' It 
was noted that curriculums and responses that address domestic/dating 
violence by young men are beginning to be developed in the writer's 
county.
    Response: OJJDP shares the writer's concern about violence 
perpetrated against female adolescents, particularly in light of 
research that indicates the median age at which girls report first 
becoming victims of sexual assault is 13. In response to this concern, 
OJJDP has awarded funds to Greene, Peters, and Associates of Nashville, 
TN, to foster comprehensive gender-specific programming for female 
juvenile offenders and girls at risk of offending, with work in this 
area including attention to the critical issue of victimization. The 
grantee also will provide training and technical assistance to help 
policymakers, service providers, detention workers, educators, service 
providers, parents, and community leaders address the complex needs of 
female adolescents who are at risk for delinquent behavior.
    OJJDP is supporting several school-based programs that address 
problems of interpersonal violence and promote peaceful resolution. The 
National Center for Conflict Resolution Education in Urbana, IL, and 
the National Resource Center for Safe Schools in Portland, OR, are 
working with schools to teach students alternatives to violence, 
including date violence. The National Hate Crime Prevention Center in 
Newton, MA, is examining the complexities of gender violence in its 
trainings with domestic violence and law enforcement personnel.
    OJJDP is also a collaborator with the National Advisory Council on 
Violence Against Women. The Council is charged with designing a 
national agenda on violence against women. When completed, this 
document will serve as a call to action and a guide to specific 
strategies to end violence against women and girls. OJJDP will continue 
to give priority to this area of activity.
    Comment: The president and CEO of a mental health organization 
wrote that it is important for OJJDP to continue to promote evidence-
based programs and would like OJJDP to take a greater leadership role 
in contradicting punitive measures and policies that do not work. The 
writer also stated that his organization would like OJJDP to decrease 
its emphasis on programs addressing a small number of serious and 
violent offenders and concentrate more on prevention of delinquency and 
early intervention with at-risk youth. The writer indicated OJJDP's 
investment in reducing child abuse, neglect, and dependency seems 
inadequate, particularly among girls, but was pleased about the focus 
on mental health. Other areas the writer supported for potential new 
funding were studying and developing programs that address female 
offenders, prevention and treatment programs for status offenders, and 
expansion of blueprint programs. This individual questioned why OJJDP 
would fund a program to reduce lead and environmental hazards based on 
the scope of the mission of OJJDP and suggested that the focus should 
be broadened to address the relationship between health status and 
delinquency. Other thoughts included concerns that efforts be closely 
coordinated, that treatment should not be viewed as a sanction, and 
that OJJDP is not focusing enough attention on the overrepresentation 
of minority youth in the juvenile justice system, while focusing too 
much on gang prevention and suppression. The letter listed four 
``unaddressed'' or ``insufficiently addressed'' areas: a focused effort 
to evaluate and replicate promising community-based models, the 
prevalence of violence exposure and trauma among justice system-
involved youth, conditions of confinement issues for youth with mental 
health and other treatment needs, and an emphasis on family outreach 
and meaningful inclusion in the juvenile justice system.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's comments concerning where 
OJJDP's program emphasis should lie as it provides the kind of feedback 
necessary for sound decisionmaking. OJJDP noted that the writer's 
comments also highlight the ever-present challenge of balancing 
resources among competing needs while addressing the continuum of 
juvenile justice and delinquency prevention needs.

[[Page 71207]]

    OJJDP acknowledged the writer's support for new programming in the 
areas of female offenders and replication of the ``Blueprints'' 
programs. With regard to his inquiry about the inclusion of ``the 
reduction of lead and environmental hazards'' in the 10 areas proposed 
for consideration, OJJDP responded that this area is consonant with the 
Office's strong emphasis on prevention activities. This Administration 
has aggressively pursued interagency partnerships in crossover areas of 
interest, and it is clear that the effects of elevated levels of lead 
in the bloodstream can cause children to suffer from physical, 
neurobiological, and cognitive problems that may lead to aberrant 
behavior, including aggression and delinquency.
    OJJDP is committed to promoting research-based programs that 
demonstrate a positive impact on the lives of at-risk and delinquent 
youth and their families. This commitment extends to all of the 
Office's work, including those projects in the area of mental health. 
This area has gained increasing emphasis in recent years, concomitant 
with an increasing recognition of the interconnections among mental 
health, substance abuse, and juvenile justice.
    In FY 2000, OJJDP will be funding several efforts in the area of 
mental health. OJJDP is pleased to support an update of the 1992 
monograph, Responding to the Mental Health Needs of Youth in the 
Juvenile Justice System. The 1992 document remains the single-most 
comprehensive source of information on issues related to the mental 
health needs of youth in the juvenile justice system, but a new 
publication is needed to capture the progress and innovation that has 
occurred during the past 8 years. In addition, OJJDP is supporting a 
project to review the issue of screening and assessment in the juvenile 
justice system. The goal is to determine what instruments and models 
are currently in use, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and 
produce recommendations regarding best practices and future research 
needs.
    OJJDP is also sponsoring basic research to identify the prevalence 
of mental health and substance abuse disorders in a large population of 
detained youth in Cook County, Illinois. In addition to prevalence 
rates, this study will explore service needs and service provision for 
this population. In combination with a similar study in New York City, 
this research may provide the clearest evidence yet of the level of 
unmet mental health needs among youth in the juvenile justice system. 
Another project, supported through an interagency agreement with the 
National Institute of Mental Health, is examining the connections 
between different types of treatment for attention deficit/
hyperactivity disorder (a known risk factor for delinquency) and 
youth's later contact with the juvenile justice system.
    Finally, OJJDP is in the midst of planning a major mental health 
demonstration project, which is still in the developmental stages and 
which will be highly dependent on future funding levels. However, the 
goal of this project will be to develop a comprehensive model for 
delivering mental health services to youth at all points in the 
juvenile justice system, from intake to aftercare. Subsequently, this 
comprehensive model would be implemented and evaluated at diverse 
sites, to determine its ability to meet the mental health needs of 
youth in the juvenile justice system.
    All the writer's comments, including suggestions of four 
unaddressed or insufficiently addressed areas, will be considered in 
the planning process for FY 2000 and beyond.
    Comment: The associate superintendent of public schools wrote to 
discuss her collaborative work with the State department of juvenile 
justice. As part of a pilot program, probation officers were placed in 
a cluster of schools to provide assistance and support in preventing 
violence. The writer believes that ``this program has had a significant 
influence in assisting delinquency reduction in the community'' and 
therefore should be carefully considered as policy decisions are made 
regarding future funding.
    Response: OJJDP commends the collaborative efforts between the 
Prince Georges County Public Schools and the State of Maryland 
Department of Juvenile Justice. OJJDP acknowledged that the work of 
these two agencies in providing a seamless mesh of services to an at-
risk population has become a statewide model for Maryland's Spotlight 
on Schools initiative. OJJDP is pleased to learn that this program has 
had a significant influence in assisting in delinquency reduction in 
the community.
    Most of OJJDP's funding is not provided under Parts C and D, but is 
distributed to the States and territories through our Formula Grants, 
Challenge, and Title V (Community Prevention) programs. OJJDP referred 
the writer to the Juvenile Justice Specialist in her State to explore 
these possible sources of funding
    Comment: The director of research and development in a law 
enforcement agency wrote in support of all of OJJDP's proposed areas as 
critical issues, with attention to what works and guidelines for 
replication. The writer indicated that improving the juvenile 
sanctioning system is of key importance and that development and 
implementation of transition programs for juvenile offenders is 
critical. It would be useful to have a focus on understanding juvenile 
crime trends, particularly if applied research is part of the 
methodology. The individual wrote that OJJDP should continue to 
encourage, if not mandate, collaboration with community organizations 
as well as the development of a continuum of services. The writer also 
stated that ``the need for training and technical assistance for public 
and community organizations and service providers is paramount,'' 
urging OJJDP to include a training component with additional support in 
the development and implementation of local initiatives.
    Response: OJJDP appreciates the writer's support for all 10 program 
areas and acknowledged her assessment that improving the juvenile 
sanctioning system is of key importance. In response to the writer's 
comment about the need for useful and timely information to help law 
enforcement agencies understand the ``whys'' behind juvenile crime 
trends, OJJDP sent a copy of the recently published, Juvenile Offenders 
and Victims: 1999 National Report. The National Report is the most 
comprehensive and up-to-date source of information about juvenile 
crime, violence, and victimization and about the response of the 
juvenile justice system to these problems.
    OJJDP agrees with the writer's position on the need for 
collaboration between community and resident organizations, the 
development of a continuum of services, and training and technical 
assistance. The Office has been pleased by the positive response from 
the field about the work already under way in these areas as part of 
OJJDP's ongoing programs and intends to continue to promote them.

Introduction to Fiscal Year 2000 Program Plan

    In administering the discretionary grants program under Parts C and 
D of Title II, OJJDP has identified four goals as the major elements of 
a sound policy that ensures public safety and security while 
establishing effective juvenile justice and delinquency prevention 
programs. Achieving these goals, which are discussed below, is vital to 
protecting the long-term safety of the public from juvenile delinquency 
and violence.

[[Page 71208]]

     OJJDP promotes delinquency prevention and early 
intervention efforts that reduce the flow of juvenile offenders into 
the juvenile justice system, the numbers of serious and violent 
offenders, and the development of chronic delinquent careers. While 
removing serious and violent juvenile offenders from the street serves 
to protect the public, long-term solutions lie primarily in taking 
aggressive steps to stop delinquency before it starts or becomes a 
pattern of behavior.
     OJJDP seeks to improve the juvenile justice system and the 
response of the system to juvenile delinquents, status offenders, and 
dependent, neglected, and abused children.
     OJJDP supports efforts in the area of corrections, 
detention, and community-based alternatives to preserve the public 
safety in a manner that serves the appropriate development and best use 
of secure detention and corrections options, while at the same time 
fostering the use of community-based programs for juvenile offenders 
that provide developmentally appropriate, culturally competent mental 
health and other critical services.
     OJJDP seeks to support law enforcement, public safety, and 
other justice agency efforts to prevent juvenile delinquency, intervene 
in the development of chronic delinquent careers, and collaborate with 
the juvenile justice system to meet the needs of dependent, neglected, 
and abused children, children who need mental health interventions, and 
children with disabilities.
    In 1993, OJJDP published its Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, 
Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders, which set forth a research-
based comprehensive approach for addressing the problems of juvenile 
crime and victimization and for achieving its program goals. The 
Comprehensive Strategy was developed to assist States and local 
communities in preventing at-risk youth from becoming serious, violent, 
and chronic juvenile offenders and in crafting a practical response to 
those who do. Over the past few years, OJJDP has tested and refined the 
prevention and graduated sanctions components of the Comprehensive 
Strategy. In 1996, OJJDP began assisting three pilot sites to formulate 
the Comprehensive Strategy plans at the local level. Lessons learned 
from those sites are being used in eight States to implement a 
strategic planning and implementation process through State 
partnerships with up to six local jurisdictions that are developing and 
implementing their own comprehensive strategies.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\  For more information about the Comprehensive Strategy, 
readers can request a copy of OJJDP Fact Sheet No. 9883, An Update 
on the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic 
Juvenile Offenders, by calling the Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 
800-638-9736. Additional information is available from the 
Comprehensive Strategy program section of OJJDP's Web site at 
www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org/strategy/index.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This Final Plan also supports the Coordinating Council's 1996 
National Juvenile Justice Action Plan, which grew out of the 
Comprehensive Strategy. This Action Plan, which the Coordinating 
Council is currently updating, provides eight objectives to reduce 
juvenile violence and describes ways to meet these objectives. 
Together, the Comprehensive Strategy and the Action Plan constitute a 
sound strategy for translating research findings and innovative 
programs into action.

Continuation Programs

    OJJDP organizes its proposed programs under four broad categories 
that reflect its program goals and the principles of the Comprehensive 
Strategy. The following summaries briefly describe some of the types of 
activities that will receive continuation funding in each category.
    Public Safety and Law Enforcement. Eight programs related to the 
important public policy issue of proliferating youth gangs are a major 
focus of OJJDP's proposals in this category. The programs range from 
demonstrations and replication of models to technical assistance and 
from evaluation to data collection and analysis. Funds will also be 
provided to a partnership between law enforcement and mental health 
services agencies to continue school-based activities and efforts to 
address the effects on children of exposure to domestic violence. Two 
programs deal with a problem of increasing public concern, gun 
violence. An evaluation is looking at the effect of transferring the 
responsibility for child protective investigations to law enforcement 
agencies.
    Delinquency Prevention and Intervention. OJJDP will fund a range of 
programs that focus on reducing risk factors and increasing protective 
factors in children's lives. The types of programs include 
demonstrations, pilots, and replication of model programs; outreach; 
studies and evaluations; and training and technical assistance. 
Beginning with early programs such as prenatal nurse home visitation, 
OJJDP's delinquency prevention and intervention efforts feature arts 
programs for at-risk youth and for those in detention and corrections 
facilities; programs that assess the role of alcohol, illegal drugs, 
mental health problems, and learning disorders in juvenile delinquency 
and programs that study effective interventions for these risk factors. 
Funding will also be provided for programs to reduce truancy and keep 
students from dropping out of school and to evaluate those efforts, 
conflict resolution programs, programs that discourage violence, and 
programs that provide opportunities for positive development and 
promote public awareness of effective solutions to juvenile crime.
    Strengthening the Juvenile Justice System. In this category, OJJDP 
will support efforts to develop comprehensive approaches to juvenile 
justice and delinquency prevention, including programs designed to 
reform juvenile justice systems in specific locations. Research-based 
guidance will be provided to States and others to improve juvenile 
justice services for students with disabilities. Some programs attempt 
to increase youth's accountability for their behavior and to prevent 
violence, while others seek to improve the quality of youth's legal 
representation and the equity and efficiency of the treatment of youth 
(including girls and minorities) at all points within the juvenile 
justice system, including points where the justice and mental health 
systems intersect and the time when youth return to the community from 
residential facilities. In addition, OJJDP will fund programs focusing 
on providing the information base necessary for sound policymaking. 
Examples include censuses and surveys of juveniles in facilities and on 
probation, an accurate program directory for use in the censuses and 
surveys, and a data analysis project.
    Child Abuse and Neglect and Dependency Courts. Three programs fall 
within this category: Safe Kids/Safe Streets: Community Approaches to 
Reducing Abuse and Neglect and Preventing Delinquency, its national 
evaluation, and a research program focusing specifically on the issue 
of child neglect.
    Overarching. In addition to the activities in the four categories 
described above, OJJDP supports programs in a broader, overarching 
category. These are programs with significant elements common to more 
than one of the other four categories. Among the overarching programs 
is a major longitudinal study of the causes and correlates of 
delinquency, which is also providing an opportunity for an

[[Page 71209]]

examination of the intergenerational transmission of antisocial 
behavior. School violence is addressed by a university-based consortium 
and by a national resource center. One initiative is assisting six 
communities in implementing comprehensive programs to reduce youth 
violence and delinquency. OJJDP will continue to fund a crime 
prevention center whose tasks include investigating the reasons for the 
overrepresentation of minorities in the Texas juvenile justice system. 
Finally, national-level statistical support, training and technical 
assistance programs, and a clearinghouse are included in the 
overarching category, as are an OJJDP management evaluation contract 
and telecommunications assistance.
    Descriptions of the specific programs in each of the five 
categories follow the discussion of new programs.

New Programs

    Because the Proposed Plan was published before the FY 2000 
appropriation was enacted, possible new programming was discussed only 
in the most general terms with descriptions of 10 broad areas in which 
new programs might be funded in FY 2000. The public was asked to 
comment on the proposed areas, which are listed below.
    1. Improving the Juvenile Sanctioning System
    2. Developing and Studying Programs Addressing Female Offenders
    3. Monitoring and Understanding the ``Whys'' Behind Juvenile Crime 
Trends
    4. Developing Blueprint Programs Through Replication and Evaluation
    5. Replicating Effective Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and 
Treatment Program Models on Native American Tribal Lands and in Alaskan 
Native Communities
    6. Developing and Evaluating Model Practices Regarding the Efficacy 
of Delinquency and Dependency Courts
    7. Reducing Lead and Environmental Hazards
    8. Addressing the Problem of Juvenile Sex Offending
    9. Developing Prevention and Treatment Programs for Status 
Offenders
    10. Supporting Field-Initiated Research and Evaluation Programs
    It appears that the funding available to OJJDP for this fiscal year 
limits its ability to support new programming. Information regarding 
the FY 2000 appropriation, feedback from the juvenile justice field, 
other public comments on the Proposed Plan, and staff review have 
resulted in a narrowing down and refinement of the 10 proposed priority 
areas. Final determination of all FY 2000 programs will depend, 
however, on the completion of the review of congressional program 
priorities for OJJDP and funding availability.
    OJJDP will give priority to funding two new program areas: 
improving the juvenile sanctioning system and improving the response to 
juvenile sex offenders. If additional monies become available or 
interagency agreements can be negotiated, other areas of interest that 
OJJDP would prioritize for funding include the following: evaluation of 
model dependency courts; survey of correctional education; a national 
survey of youth; and reducing lead and environmental hazards.
    In addition, depending on availability of funds, the Office intends 
to enhance or restructure existing efforts to better focus its work in 
the following areas: girls in the juvenile justice system; 
disproportionate minority confinement; hate crime prevention; gang-free 
schools and communities initiatives; State and local juvenile justice 
policymaking; the engagement of faith-based organizations; 
``Blueprint'' program replication and evaluation; detention and 
corrections programming; and monitoring and understanding the ``whys'' 
behind juvenile crime trends.
    Two additional points should be made concerning new programming 
listed for consideration in the Proposed Plan:
    First, consistent with the public comments received, OJJDP is 
cognizant of the need to give the States good guidance on the handling 
of status offenders. The Office is currently conducting work around 
underage drinking, family strengthening, runaways and missing youth, 
and truancy programs. In addition, OJJDP will explore possible ways to 
gather and disseminate the best information available about status 
offending, including training and technical assistance support through 
its new training and technical assistance provider.
    Second, it may be possible to support some field-initiated research 
in FY 2000 by identifying funding streams other than those that support 
programs under Parts C and D of the JJDP Act (e.g., Juvenile 
Accountability Incentive Block Grants).
    Those who commented on the Proposed Plan and other interested 
parties should watch for program announcements on OJJDP's Web site 
(www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org--click on ``Grants & Funding'') during the coming 
months to learn of any new programming that may be funded in FY 2000. 
Readers can also obtain this information by calling the Juvenile 
Justice Clearinghouse (800-638-8736) or subscribing to OJJDP's 
electronic newsletter, JUVJUST, by sending an e-mail message to 
[email protected], leaving the subject line blank, and typing 
subscribe juvjust your name in the body of the message.

Fiscal Year 2000 Programs

    The following are the programs that OJJDP intends to continue to 
fund in FY 2000. These programs are listed alphabetically and 
summarized within each of the five categories: Overarching, Public 
Safety and Law Enforcement, Strengthening the Juvenile Justice System, 
Delinquency Prevention and Intervention, and Child Abuse and Neglect 
and Dependency Courts.
    With regard to implementation sites and other descriptive data and 
information, program priorities within each category will be determined 
based on grantee performance, application quality, fund availability, 
and other factors.
    As part of the appropriations process, Congress identified a number 
of programs for priority funding consideration by OJJDP with regard to 
the grantee(s), the amount of funds, or both. These programs, which are 
listed below, are not included in the program descriptions.

Achievable Dream After School Program
Catholic Charities, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky
Center on Crimes/Violence Against Children
Culinary Arts for At-Risk Youth
Innovative Partnerships for High Risk Youth
Juvenile Justice Tribal Collaboration and Technical Assistance
Kids With A Promise Program
L.A. Best Youth Program
L.A. Dads/Family Programs
L.A. Bridges After School Program
Lincoln Action Programs-Youth Violence Alternative Project
Low Country Children's Center Program
Mecklenburg County's Domestic Violence HERO Program
Milwaukee Safe and Sound Program
Mount Hope Center
National Association of State Fire Marshals-Juvenile Firesetters 
Initiative
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
Law-Related Education
No Workshops * * * No Jump Shots Program
Operation Quality Time Program
Parents Anonymous
Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, After School Program
Suffolk University Center for Juvenile Justice

[[Page 71210]]

University of Missouri-Kansas City Juvenile Justice Research Center
University of Montana Juvenile After School Program
Vermont Association of Court Diversion
Youth Crime Watch Initiative of Florida
Youth Challenge Program

    In addition, OJJDP is directed to examine each of the following 
proposals, provide grants if warranted, and report to the Committees on 
Appropriations on both the House and Senate on its intentions for each 
proposal.

At Risk Youth Program in Wausau, Wisconsin
Consortium on Children, Families, and the Law
Hawaii Lawyers Care Na Keiki Law Center
Juvenile Justice program in Kansas City, Missouri
Learning for Life Program
New Mexico Cooperative Extension Service 4-H Youth Development Program
OASIS
Oklahoma State Transition and Reintegration Services (STARS)
Rapid Response Program, Washington/Hancock County, Maine
St. Louis City Regional Violence Prevention Initiative
University of South Alabama's Youth Violence Project

Fiscal Year 2000 Program Listing

Overarching

Coalition for Juvenile Justice
Hamilton Fish National Institute on School and Community Violence
Insular Area Support
Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse
Juvenile Justice Statistics and Systems Development
National Resource Center for Safe Schools
National Training and Technical Assistance Center
OJJDP Management Evaluation Contract
OJJDP Technical Assistance Support Contract--Juvenile Justice Resource 
Center
Program of Research on the Causes and Correlates of Delinquency
SafeFutures: Partnerships To Reduce Youth Violence and Delinquency
Technical Assistance for State Legislatures
Telecommunications Assistance
Texas Juvenile Crime Prevention Center at Prairie View A&M University--
Enhancing Personal Training and Understanding Minority 
Overrepresentation in the Juvenile Justice System
Training and Technical Assistance Coordination for the SafeFutures and 
Safe Kids/Safe Streets Initiatives

Public Safety and Law Enforcement

Child Development-Community-Oriented Policing (CD-CP)
Education on Gun Violence and Safety
Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community-Wide Approach to Gang 
Prevention; Intervention, and Suppression Program
Evaluation of the Partnerships To Reduce Juvenile Gun Violence Program
Evaluation of the Rural Gang Initiative
Evaluation of the Transfer of Responsibility for Child Protective 
Investigations to Law Enforcement Agencies
Gang Prevention Through Targeted Outreach (Boys & Girls Clubs)
Juvenile Justice Law Enforcement Training and Technical Assistance 
Program
National Youth Gang Center
Partnerships To Reduce Juvenile Gun Violence
Rural Gang Initiative Demonstration Sites
Technical Assistance to Gang-Free Schools and Communities Initiatives
Training and Technical Assistance for the Rural Gang Initiative

Delinquency Prevention and Intervention

America's Promise: Enhanced Collaboration
Arts and At-Risk Youth
Arts Programs for Juvenile Offenders in Detention and Corrections
Assessing Alcohol, Drug, and Mental Health Disorders
Communities in Schools--Federal Interagency Partnership
A Demonstration Afterschool Program
Diffusion of State Risk- and Protective-Factor Focused Prevention
Evaluation of the Truancy Reduction Program
Hate Crime
Intergenerational Transmission of Antisocial Behavior Project
Investing in Youth for a Safer Future--A Public Education Campaign
Multisite, Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention 
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
National Center for Conflict Resolution Education
Partnerships for Preventing Violence
Proactive Youth Program
Professional Development in Effective Classroom and Conflict Management
Risk Reduction Via Promotion of Youth Development
Strengthening Services for Chemically Involved Children, Youth, and 
Families
Training and Technical Assistance Program for the Arts Programs for 
Juvenile Offenders in Detention and Corrections Initiative
Truancy Reduction Demonstration Program

Strengthening the Juvenile Justice System

Balanced and Restorative Justice (BARJ) Training Project
Building Blocks for Youth
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement
Center for Students with Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice System
Circles of Care Program
Community Assessment Center
Comprehensive Children and Families Mental Health Training and 
Technical Assistance
Development of the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and 
Chronic Juvenile Offenders
Evaluation of the Department of Labor's Education and Training for 
Youthful Offenders Initiative
Evaluation of the Intensive Community-Based Aftercare Program
Evaluation of Teen Courts
Helping Communities To Promote Youth Development
Intensive Community-Based Aftercare Demonstration and Technical 
Assistance Program
Juvenile Defender Training, Technical Assistance, and Resource Center
The Juvenile Justice Prosecution Unit
Juvenile Residential Facility Census
Linking Balanced and Restorative Justice and Adolescents (LIBRA)
Longitudinal Study To Examine the Development of Conduct Disorder in 
Girls
National Juvenile Justice Data Analysis Project
National Juvenile Justice Program Directory
The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 97
Performance-Based Standards for Juvenile Correction and Detention 
Facilities
San Francisco Juvenile Justice Local Action Plan--Delancy Street 
Initiative
Survey of Juvenile Probation
Technical Assistance to Native American Tribes and Alaskan Native 
Communities
TeenSupreme Career Preparation Initiative
Training and Technical Support for State and Local Jurisdictional Teams 
To Focus on Juvenile Corrections and Detention Overcrowding

Child Abuse and Neglect and Dependency Courts

National Evaluation of the Safe Kids/Safe Streets Program
Nurse Home Visitation

[[Page 71211]]

Research on Child Neglect
Safe Kids/Safe Streets: Community Approaches to Reducing Abuse and 
Neglect and Preventing Delinquency

Overarching

Coalition for Juvenile Justice
    This project supports the Coalition in its efforts to meet the 
statutory mandates through the development of a technical assistance 
capability that provides training, technical assistance, and 
information to the State Juvenile Justice Advisory Groups. This will be 
accomplished through a series of regional training and information 
workshops and a national conference designed to address the needs of 
the membership of the Coalition.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Coalition for Juvenile Justice. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Hamilton Fish National Institute on School and Community Violence
    The Institute, with assistance from OJJDP, was founded in 1997 to 
serve as a national resource to test the effectiveness of school 
violence prevention methods and to develop more effective violence 
prevention strategies. The Institute's goal is to determine what works 
and what can be replicated to reduce violence in America's schools and 
their immediate communities. The Institute works with a consortium of 
seven universities whose key staff have expertise in adolescent 
violence, criminology, law enforcement, substance abuse, juvenile 
justice, gangs, public health, education, behavior disorders, social 
skills development and prevention programs. The George Washington 
University develops and tests violence prevention strategies in 
collaboration with the following universities: Eastern Kentucky 
University, Florida State University, Morehouse School of Medicine, 
Syracuse University, University of Oregon, and University of Wisconsin-
Milwaukee.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, George 
Washington University. No additional applications will be solicited in 
FY 2000.
Insular Area Support
    The purpose of this statutorily required program is to provide 
support to the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Funds are available to 
address the special needs and problems of juvenile delinquency in these 
insular areas, as specified by Section 261(e) of the JJDP Act of 1974, 
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 5665(e).
Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse
    A component of the National Criminal Justice Reference Service 
(NCJRS), the Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse (JJC) collects, 
synthesizes, and disseminates information on all aspects of juvenile 
justice. OJJDP established the Clearinghouse in 1979 to serve the 
juvenile justice community, legislators, the media, and the public. JJC 
offers toll-free telephone access to information; prepares specialized 
responses to information requests; produces, warehouses, and 
distributes OJJDP publications; exhibits at national conferences; 
maintains a comprehensive juvenile justice library and database; and 
administers several electronic information resources. NCJRS is 
administered by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) under a 
competitively awarded contract to Aspen Systems Corporation.
    This program will be implemented by the current contractor, Aspen 
Systems Corporation. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Juvenile Justice Statistics and Systems Development Program
    The Juvenile Justice Statistics and Systems Development (SSD) 
Program was competitively awarded in 1990 to the National Center for 
Juvenile Justice (NCJJ) to improve national, State, and local 
statistics on juveniles as victims and offenders. The SSD project has 
traditionally consisted of three tracks of work: National Statistics, 
Dissemination, and Systems Development. In FY 2000, NCJJ will continue 
many activities under the first two tracks, including maintaining an 
extensive library of data files, producing Easy Access software 
packages and the Web-based OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book, and 
continuing to service requests for juvenile justice information. In FY 
2000, additional funding from OJJDP will also enable NCJJ to enhance 
activities under the Systems Development track of the project.
    To meet the challenge of managing the cases of youth within their 
jurisdiction effectively and efficiently, juvenile court administrators 
and judges need ready access to information that will support the 
operation, management, and decisionmaking of the full-service juvenile 
court system. Knowledge and decisionmaking (which should be the 
hallmark of every juvenile justice system) requires not just the 
collection of data, but the collaboration of the community leaders who 
will give meaning to the data. This is the focus of the forthcoming 
book, Juvenile Justice With Eyes Open, which will be published in FY 
2000 as part of the Statistics and Systems Development Project (Systems 
Development Track). Also in FY 2000, NCJJ will use the principles 
outlined in this publication to develop and field-test an approach that 
local jurisdictions can employ to systematically identify and then 
fulfill their local information needs. This includes training local 
juvenile justice leaders in the rational decisionmaking model (RDM) as 
a design tool for management information systems; developing data 
specifications for an effective information system to meet operational, 
management, and research needs; identifying data needs from collateral 
service providers and data that will be of use to collaterals; and 
modeling agreements and protocols with collateral service providers to 
share case-level and/or aggregate data.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Center for Juvenile Justice. No additional applications will 
be solicited in FY 2000.
National Resource Center for Safe Schools
    Since 1984, OJJDP and the U.S. Department of Education have 
provided joint funding to promote safe schools. This work has focused 
national attention on cooperative solutions to problems that disrupt 
the educational process. Because an estimated 3 million incidents of 
crime occur in America's schools each year, it is clear that this 
problem continues to plague many schools, threatening students' safety 
and undermining the learning environment. With FY 1998 funding, the 
U.S. Department of Education's Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program and 
OJJDP established the National Resource Center for Safe Schools under a 
3-year project period. This project expanded the scope and provision of 
previous training and technical assistance to communities and school 
districts across the country. The grantee is working to help schools 
develop and put in place comprehensive safe school plans. It does this 
through onsite training and consultation to schools and communities, by 
creating and distributing resource materials and tools, through Web-
based information services, and by partnering with State-level agencies 
to build State capacity to assist local education agencies. Through the 
inclusion on the project's Advisory Committee of representatives of 
Hamilton Fish National Institute on School and Community Violence and

[[Page 71212]]

other school-related training and technical assistance providers, this 
project has developed training materials and information resources 
based on the latest research findings on effective programs and best 
practices.
    The project will continue to be implemented by the current grantee, 
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
National Training and Technical Assistance Center
    The National Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Training 
and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) was established in FY 1995 
under a competitive 3-year project period award. NTTAC serves as a 
national training and technical assistance clearinghouse, inventorying 
and coordinating the integrated delivery of juvenile justice training 
and technical assistance resources and establishing a database of these 
resources.
    NTTAC's funding in FY 1996 provided services in the form of 
coordinated technical assistance support for OJJDP's SafeFutures and 
gang program initiatives, continued promotion of collaboration between 
OJJDP training and technical assistance providers, developed training/
technical assistance materials, and completed and disseminated the 
first OJJDP Training and Technical Assistance Resource Catalog.
    In FY 1997, NTTAC disseminated a second, updated Training and 
Technical Assistance Resource Catalog; created a Web site for the 
Center and a ListServe for the Children, Youth and Affinity Group; held 
three focus groups on needs assessments; and coordinated and provided 
38 instances of technical assistance in conjunction with OJJDP's 
training and technical assistance grantees and contractors.
    In FY 1998, NTTAC finalized the jurisdictional team training and 
technical assistance packages on critical needs in the juvenile justice 
system, updated the resource catalog, facilitated the annual OJJDP 
training and technical assistance grantee and contractor meeting, 
continued to update the repository of training and technical assistance 
materials and the electronic database of training and technical 
assistance materials, and continued to respond to training and 
technical assistance requests from the field.
    In FY 1999, NTTAC was operated by OJJDP staff with the support of 
the Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse, providing clearinghouse services 
and maintenance of the 800 number. The Fourth Grantee-Contractor 
meeting was conducted by OJJDP staff in Chicago and the training and 
technical protocols developed in 1998 were discussed for final issue. 
These are being finalized and will be disseminated in FY 2000. A 
contract was awarded to Caliber Associates to continue implementation 
of the Center.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, Caliber 
Associates. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
OJJDP Management Evaluation Contract
    This contract was competitively awarded in FY 1999 to Caliber 
Associates for a period of 3 years to provide OJJDP with an expert 
resource to perform independent program evaluations and assist in 
implementing evaluation activities. Evaluations may be conducted on 
OJJDP-funded programs and on other programs designed to prevent and 
treat juvenile delinquency. The time and cost of each evaluation 
depends on program complexity, availability of data, and purpose of the 
evaluation. Because the purpose of many evaluations is to inform 
management decisions, the completion of an evaluation and submission of 
a report may be required in a specific and, often, short time period.
    This program will be implemented by the current contractor, Caliber 
Associates. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
OJJDP Technical Assistance Support Contract--Juvenile Justice Resource 
Center
    This contract has been competitively awarded since the mid-1980's 
when OJJDP identified the need for technical assistance support in 
carrying out its mission. The Juvenile Justice Resource Center (JJRC) 
provides technical assistance and support to OJJDP, its grantees, and 
the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 
in the areas of program development, evaluation, training, and 
research. With assistance from expert consultants, JJRC coordinates the 
peer review process for OJJDP grant applications and grantee reports, 
conducts research and prepares reports on current juvenile justice 
issues, plans meetings and conferences, and provides administrative 
support to various Federal councils and boards.
    This contract will be implemented by the current contractor, Aspen 
Systems Corporation. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Program of Research on the Causes and Correlates of Delinquency
    Since 1986, this longitudinal study has addressed a variety of 
issues related to juvenile violence and delinquency and has produced a 
massive amount of information on the causes and correlates of 
delinquent behavior. Three project sites participate: Institute of 
Behavioral Science, University of Colorado at Boulder; Western 
Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh; and 
Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center, University at Albany, State 
University of New York. These projects are designed to improve the 
understanding of serious delinquency, violence, and drug use by 
examining how youth develop within the context of family, school, 
peers, and community. The three sites engage in both collaborative and 
site-specific research. From the beginning, the three research teams 
have worked together to ensure that certain core measures are identical 
across the sites. This strengthens the findings from these projects by 
allowing for replications of findings in individual sites and enabling 
cross-site analyses.
    Results from the study have been used extensively in the field of 
juvenile justice and contributed significantly to the development of 
OJJDP's Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic 
Juvenile Offenders and other program initiatives. Over the years, 
findings from the Causes and Correlates research have been presented in 
a number of OJJDP Bulletins and Fact Sheets. In an effort to make these 
important findings increasingly accessible to the public, OJJDP 
recently added to its Web site a subpage devoted to the Program of 
Research on the Causes and Correlates of Delinquency. This subpage, 
under the ``Programs'' topic of the OJJDP Web site, includes 
descriptions of the individual projects and a bibliography of all the 
publications resulting from these projects.
    In the upcoming year, the Causes and Correlates projects will 
continue collaborative and site-specific analyses of the data. Topics 
for upcoming reports will include defining characteristics and 
predictors of very young offending, delinquency and victimization at 
school, and the causes of violence in disadvantaged neighborhoods. In 
addition, there are plans for a meeting to bring together all the 
Federal agencies that have contributed to the Program of Research on 
the Causes and Correlates of Delinquency to discuss future plans and 
directions for these projects.

[[Page 71213]]

    This program will be implemented by the current grantees. No 
additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Safe Futures: Partnerships To Reduce Youth Violence and Delinquency
    OJJDP is awarding grants of up to $1.4 million annually to each of 
six communities for a 5-year project period that began in FY 1995, to 
assist in implementing comprehensive community programs designed to 
reduce youth violence and delinquency. Boston, MA; Contra Costa County, 
CA; Fort Belknap, MT (tribal site); Imperial County, CA (rural site); 
St. Louis, MO; and Seattle, WA, were competitively selected to receive 
awards under the SafeFutures program on the basis of their substantial 
planning and progress in community assessment and strategic planning to 
address delinquency.
    SafeFutures seeks to prevent and control youth crime and 
victimization through the creation of a continuum of care in 
communities. This continuum enables communities to be responsive to the 
needs of youth at critical stages of their development by providing an 
appropriate range of prevention, intervention, treatment, and sanctions 
programs.
    Each of the six sites will continue to provide a set of services 
that builds on community strengths and existing services and fills in 
gaps within their existing continuum. These services include family 
strengthening; after school activities; mentoring; treatment 
alternatives for juvenile female offenders; mental health services; day 
treatment; graduated sanctions for serious, violent, and chronic 
juvenile offenders; and gang prevention, intervention, and suppression. 
During the fourth year of the project, specific attention will be given 
to care coordination and program sustainability.
    A national evaluation is being conducted by the Urban Institute to 
determine the success of the initiative and track lessons learned at 
each of the six sites. OJJDP has also committed a cadre of training and 
technical assistance (TTA) resources to SafeFutures through a full-time 
TTA coordinator for SafeFutures and a host of partner organizations 
committed to assisting SafeFutures sites.
    SafeFutures activities will be carried out by the six current 
grantees. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Technical Assistance for State Legislatures
    Since FY 1995, OJJDP has awarded annual grants to the National 
Conference of State Legislatures to provide relevant, timely 
information on comprehensive approaches in juvenile justice to aid 
State legislators in improving State juvenile justice systems. Nearly 
every State has enacted, or is considering, statutory changes affecting 
the juvenile justice system. This project has helped policymakers 
understand the ramifications and nuances of juvenile justice reform. 
The grant has improved capacity for the delivery of information 
services to legislatures. The project also supports increased 
communication between State legislators and State and local leaders who 
influence decisionmaking regarding juvenile justice issues.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Conference on State Legislatures. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Telecommunications Assistance
    OJJDP uses information technology and distance training to 
facilitate access to information and training for juvenile justice 
professionals. This cost-effective medium enhances OJJDP's ability to 
share with the field salient elements of the most effective or 
promising approaches to various juvenile justice issues. In FY 1995, 
OJJDP awarded a competitive grant to Eastern Kentucky University (EKU) 
to produce live satellite teleconferences. To date, EKU has produced 21 
telecasts. In FY 1999, OJJDP continued the cooperative agreement with 
EKU to provide program support and technical assistance for a variety 
of information technologies and to explore linkages with key 
constituent groups to advance mutual information goals and objectives. 
During the past year, EKU has experimented with cybercasting ``live'' 
satellite videoconferences on the Internet.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, Eastern 
Kentucky University. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Texas Juvenile Crime Prevention Center at Prairie View A&M University--
Enhancing Personal Training and Understanding Minority 
Overrepresentation in the Juvenile Justice System
    This 3-year project was initially funded in FY 1998. The purpose of 
the program was to create the Texas Juvenile Crime Prevention Center at 
Prairie View A&M University (the Center) and to have the Center 
undertake three initial tasks. These tasks included the development of 
a master's degree in Forensic Psychology, the development of a training 
institute for the coordinators of 13 community youth development 
projects, and a study to investigate the factors contributing to the 
disproportionate representation of minority youth in the Texas juvenile 
justice system.
    The master's degree in Forensic Psychology includes a minimum of 30 
semester hours, exclusive of thesis. The development of the curriculum 
and an instrument to test its effectiveness will occur in the first 2 
years of the grant. The courses for the master's degree will be taught 
in the second and third years with the testing of the effectiveness of 
the curriculum being completed by the end of the third year. The 
objectives of this curriculum development are to increase the 
understanding, knowledge, and skills of in-service professionals 
regarding juvenile behaviors; to increase the number of qualified 
professionals working with juvenile offenders; and to decrease the 
number of juveniles who become repeat offenders.
    The training institute at Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU) will 
focus training on the coordinators of the Texas Department of 
Protective and Regulatory Services Community Youth Development Project. 
The 12 counties in Texas with the highest number of juvenile arrests 
were selected to design comprehensive approaches to support families 
and enhance the positive development of youth. PVAMU is offering the 
project coordinators program management and evaluation skills courses. 
Each year for 3 years an intensive 2-week course will be offered to the 
coordinators on managing and monitoring service delivery and basic 
research and evaluation skills development.
    Funding in FY 2000 will allow PVAMU to implement and test the 
curriculum that has been developed in the first 2 years, hold a third 
2-week seminar that develops skills in managing and monitoring services 
and basic research and evaluation skills of the youth development 
coordinators, and continue support for the study of the 
overrepresentation of minorities in the Waller County Juvenile Court.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, the Texas 
Juvenile Crime Prevention Center at Prairie View A&M University. No 
additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.

[[Page 71214]]

Training and Technical Assistance Coordination for the SafeFutures and 
Safe Kids/Safe Streets Initiatives
    OJJDP will continue funding for long-term training and technical 
assistance to the SafeFutures and Safe Kids/Safe Streets initiatives. 
This coordination effort builds local capacity for implementing and 
sustaining effective continuum-of-care and systems chance approaches in 
six SafeFutures and five Safe Kids/Safe Streets sites. Project 
activities include assessment, identification, and coordination of the 
implementation of training and technical assistance needs at each of 
the sites and the administration of cross-site training.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, Patricia 
Donahue. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.

Public Safety and Law Enforcement

Child Development-Community-Oriented Policing (CD-CP)
    The Child Development-Community-Oriented Policing (CD-CP) program 
is an innovative partnership between the New Haven Department of Police 
Services and the Child Study Center at the Yale University School of 
Medicine that addresses the psychological burdens on children, 
families, and the broader community as children witness increasing 
levels of community violence. In FY 1993, OJJDP provided support to 
document Yale-New Haven's child-centered, community-oriented policing 
model. The model consists of interrelated training of police officers, 
consultation, and teaming mental health clinicians with law enforcement 
in intervening onsite with children and families who witness violence. 
OJJDP, with first-year support from the Office of Justice Programs' 
Bureau of Justice Assistance, funded a 3-year replication of the model 
in Buffalo, NY; Charlotte, NC; Nashville, TN; and Portland, OR. Other 
OJP components joined OJJDP in funding an expansion of CD-CP in FY 
1998. This expansion moved the project into school-based activities and 
the area of addressing exposure to violence in domestic settings and 
will continue to do so in FY 2000.
    This project will be continued by the current grantee, the Yale 
University School of Medicine, in collaboration with the New Haven 
Department of Police Services. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Education on Gun Violence and Safety
    OJJDP will continue partnering with the Bureau of Justice 
Assistance to support Education on Gun Violence and Safety. This 
project seeks to educate gunowners and parents about how to safely use 
and store guns and how to protect children from gun violence. Through a 
coordinated communications, education, grassroots, and media campaign, 
the project will reach gunowners and other caring adults with important 
information on preventing youth's illegal access to and unlawful use of 
guns. In FY 2000, based upon critical communications research with 
gunowners, the communications campaign will disseminate appropriate 
educational materials.
    The program will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Crime Prevention Council and the Ad Council. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community-Wide Approach to Gang 
Prevention, Intervention, and Suppression Program
    OJJDP will continue funding this evaluation in FY 2000. Under a 
competitive cooperative agreement awarded in FY 1995, the evaluation 
grantee assisted the five program sites (Bloomington, IL; Mesa, AZ; 
Riverside, CA; San Antonio, TX; and Tucson, AZ) in establishing 
realistic and measurable objectives, documenting program 
implementation, and measuring the impact of this comprehensive 
approach. It has also provided interim feedback to the program 
implementors and trained the local site interviewers. The grantee will 
continue to gather and analyze data required to evaluate the program, 
monitor and oversee the quality control of data, provide assistance for 
completion of interviews, and provide ongoing feedback to project 
sites.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration. No 
additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Evaluation of the Partnerships To Reduce Juvenile Gun Violence Program
    This project began with a competitive award in FY 1997 to document 
and evaluate the process of community mobilization, planning, and 
collaboration needed to develop a comprehensive, collaborative approach 
to reducing gun violence involving juveniles. The Partnerships to 
Reduce Juvenile Gun Violence Program is being implemented in three 
sites: Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Oakland, California; and Syracuse, New 
York. The grantee, COSMOS Corporation, will complete data collection 
for the impact portion of this evaluation and submit a final report in 
the next year. In addition to working with the three Partnership sites, 
COSMOS Corporation completed work in FY 1998 on the Promising 
Strategies To Reduce Gun Violence Report. COSMOS will develop a 
training and technical assistance protocol based on its experience with 
the Partnership sites and the gun violence report. This training and 
technical assistance package will be used with additional communities 
across the country that are focused on reducing gun violence through a 
collaborative planning process.
    This evaluation and training development will be implemented by the 
current grantee, COSMOS Corporation. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Evaluation of the Rural Gang Initiative
    This initiative is a continuation of ongoing efforts to test 
OJJDP's Comprehensive Gang Model. In FY 1999, four rural sites began 
conducting comprehensive assessments of their local gang problem and 
engaging in program design to implement the Comprehensive Gang Model. 
These sites are Elk City, OK; Glenn County, CA; Mt. Vernon, IL; and 
Longview, WA. The National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) is 
conducting case studies to document and analyze the 1-year community 
assessment and program planning efforts in the four sites. These case 
studies will contribute to the development of a model approach to 
assessment of community gang problems in rural areas. NCCD will also be 
developing an outcome evaluation design for sites that are funded to 
implement the model in subsequent years. FY 2000 funding will support 
the first year of the outcome evaluation.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Council on Crime and Delinquency. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Evaluation of the Transfer of Responsibility for Child Protective 
Investigations to Law Enforcement Agencies
    In response to concerns about the increasing demands on public 
child welfare agencies, the safety of children, and the effectiveness 
of law enforcement and social service agencies to deliver critical 
services, the State of Florida has passed legislation that allows for 
the transfer of the entire responsibility for child protective 
investigations to a law enforcement agency. Currently, three counties 
in Florida are in various stages of

[[Page 71215]]

implementing this transfer of responsibility. This project will compare 
the outcomes in the three counties where responsibility is being 
transferred to the Sheriff's Office with three comparison counties in 
the State of Florida. The project will primarily be concerned with 
whether children are safer, whether perpetrators of severe child abuse 
are more likely to face criminal sanctions, and whether there are 
impacts on other parts of the child welfare system. Also, a thorough 
process evaluation will be conducted to describe and compare the 
implementation process across the three counties.
    This project will be conducted by the School of Social Work at the 
University of Pennsylvania. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Gang Prevention Through Targeted Outreach (Boys & Girls Clubs)
    The purpose of this program is to enable local Boys & Girls Clubs 
to prevent youth from entering gangs, intervene with gang members in 
the early stages of gang involvement, and divert youth from gang 
activities into more constructive programs. This program reflects the 
ongoing collaboration between OJJDP and the Boys & Girls Clubs to 
reduce problems of juvenile delinquency and violence. The Boys & Girls 
Clubs of America provides training and technical assistance to local 
gang prevention and intervention sites, including some at SafeFutures 
and OJJDP Comprehensive Gang sites, and other clubs and organizations 
through regional trainings and national conferences. In FY 1999, the 
Boys & Girls Clubs added as many as 30 new gang prevention sites, 5 new 
gang intervention sites, and at least 2 ``Targeted Reintegration'' 
sites where clubs work to provide services to youth returning to the 
community from juvenile correctional facilities to prevent them from 
returning to gangs and violence. The Boys & Girls Clubs of America will 
also hold a Delinquency and Gang Prevention Symposium in March 2000. A 
national evaluation of this program is being implemented by Public/
Private Ventures.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, the Boys & 
Girls Clubs of America. No additional applications will be solicited in 
FY 2000.
Juvenile Justice Law Enforcement Training and Technical Assistance 
Program
    Over the past decade, alarming reports of youth violence have 
appeared with increasing frequency in publications and the news media. 
Law enforcement agencies across the Nation are responding to this sense 
of national emergency by changing many of their policies and practices 
to cope with juvenile crime and victimization.
    The Juvenile Justice Law Enforcement Training and Technical 
Assistance Program examines adolescent violence in the United States 
both as a social phenomenon and a policy issue. The program covers the 
range of youth violence issues from crime statistics to new 
legislation. The program also sets forth comprehensive analysis of key 
areas of youth violence policy and practice: youth firearm possession 
and use, school violence and safety, youth-oriented community policing, 
gang and drug involvement, serious habitual offenders, 
multidisciplinary communitywide youth violence reduction strategies, 
police management of youth programs, tribal juvenile crime, and Chief 
Executive Officer responses to delinquency and violence.
    Throughout the program, the core issues of youth violence are 
examined through an appropriate set of responses to youth violence that 
are consistent with effective police practice and a positive future for 
America's youth. In addition, key leaders from law enforcement, 
prosecution services, the courts, corrections, probation, and other 
juvenile justice agencies are offered information, materials, solutions 
to management issues, and technical assistance in the prevention and 
control of youth crime.
    FY 1998 and 1999 funds supported the continuation of eight State, 
local, and tribal program workshops: The Chief Executive Officer Youth 
Violence Forum (CEO Forum); Managing Juvenile Operations (MJO); Gang, 
Gun, and Drug Policy; School Administrators for Effective Operations 
Leading to Improved Children and Youth Services (SAFE POLICY); Youth-
Oriented Community Policing; Tribal Justice Training and Technical 
Assistance; the Serious Habitual Offender Comprehensive Action Program 
(SHOCAP); and the Youth Violence Reduction Comprehensive Action 
Program.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
International Association of Chiefs of Police under a cooperative 
agreement with OJJDP. No additional applications will be solicited in 
FY 2000.
National Youth Gang Center
    The proliferation of gang problems over the past two decades led 
OJJDP to develop a comprehensive, coordinated response to America's 
gang problem. This response involved five program components, one of 
which was implementation and operation of the National Youth Gang 
Center (NYGC). Competitively funded with FY 1994 funds to expand and 
maintain the body of critical knowledge about youth gangs and effective 
responses to them, NYGC provides support services to the National Youth 
Gang Consortium, composed of Federal agencies with responsibilities in 
this area. NYGC is also providing technical assistance for the Rural 
Gang Initiative planning and assessment phase. OJJDP will extend the 
NYGC project an additional year and provide FY 2000 funds to NYGC to 
(1) conduct more indepth analyses of the National Youth Gang Survey 
results that track changes in gang membership and gang-related crime, 
(2) produce timely information on the nature and scope of the youth 
gang problem, and (3) continue efforts to foster integration of gang-
related items into other relevant surveys and national data collection 
efforts.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Institute for Intergovernmental Research. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Partnerships To Reduce Juvenile Gun Violence
    OJJDP will award continuation grants to each of three competitively 
selected communities that initially received funds in FY 1997 to 
increase the effectiveness of existing youth gun violence reduction 
strategies by enhancing and coordinating prevention, intervention, and 
suppression strategies and strengthening linkages among community 
residents, law enforcement, and the juvenile justice system. Baton 
Rouge, LA; Oakland, CA; and Syracuse, NY, were selected to receive 3-
year awards. The goals of this initiative are to reduce juveniles' 
illegal access to guns and address the reasons they carry and use guns 
in violent exchanges. A national evaluation currently under way will 
document the process of community mobilization, planning, and 
collaboration needed to develop a comprehensive, collaborative approach 
to reducing juvenile gun violence.
    The Partnerships To Reduce Juvenile Gun Violence program will be 
carried out by the three current grantees, Baton Rouge, LA; Oakland, 
CA; and Syracuse, NY. No additional applications will be solicited in 
FY 2000.

[[Page 71216]]

Rural Gang Initiative Demonstration Sites
    In FY 1999, OJJDP supported four rural communities (Elk City, OK; 
Glenn County, CA; Longview, WA; and Mount Vernon, IL) to conduct a 
comprehensive assessment of the local youth gang problem in these 
communities. Each site has collected relevant data from multiple 
sources, including police, schools, courts, and community residents, 
and has gathered various types of data, including gang crime data, data 
on the presence of risk factors for gang membership, community 
demographics, and community surveys and focus groups. Once data 
collection is complete, the communities will use these data in a 
comprehensive program planning process to adapt and implement the OJJDP 
Comprehensive Gang Model. In FY 2000, OJJDP will support these 
communities in the implementation of the OJJDP Comprehensive Gang 
Model. An independent evaluation of this effort will also be conducted, 
along with technical assistance through the National Youth Gang Center.
    This initiative will be implemented by the four current grantees: 
Elk City, OK; Glenn County, CA; Longview, WA; and Mount Vernon, IL. No 
additional applications will be solicited for this initiative in FY 
2000.
Technical Assistance to Gang-Free Schools and Communities Initiatives
    In FY 1999, OJJDP began planning for a potential school-centered 
gang initiative and a multisite replication of the OJJDP Comprehensive 
Gang Model. In FY 2000, OJJDP will fund the National Youth Gang Center 
to provide technical assistance during the developmental stages of this 
initiative and during the implementation of these efforts in selected 
communities across the country. The National Youth Gang Center is 
currently providing technical assistance on OJJDP's model to 
communities involved in OJJDP's Rural Gang Initiative and to other 
OJJDP grantees.
    OJJDP will provide a supplemental award to the National Youth Gang 
Center to provide the technical assistance. No new applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Training and Technical Assistance for the Rural Gang Initiative
    In FY 1998, OJJDP provided supplemental funding support to the 
National Youth Gang Center to provide training and technical assistance 
to demonstration sites under OJJDP's Rural Gang Initiative. In FY 2000, 
training and technical assistance will continue to be provided to those 
sites chosen to implement the OJJDP Comprehensive Gang model. Training 
and technical assistance will focus on adapting the OJJDP model to 
rural jurisdictions and on implementing the model in a theoretically 
sound manner. Assistance will be delivered through onsite visits, 
conferences, meetings, and other means such as telephone and electronic 
media.
    This initiative will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Youth Gang Center. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.

Delinquency Prevention and Intervention

America's Promise: Enhanced Collaboration
    The Presidents' Summit for America's Future held in April 1997 in 
Philadelphia represented the first-ever call to action by all living 
Presidents on a social initiative to encourage concerned citizens, 
communities, and the business, nonprofit, and government sectors to 
work together to improve the lives of children in the United States. 
The goals of America's Promise, the 501.c.3 established by General 
Colin Powell in response to this summit, state that young people should 
have access to five fundamental resources that are necessary to 
maximize their potential: (1) An ongoing relationship with a caring 
adult (mentor, tutor, coach); (2) safe places and structured activities 
during nonschool hours to learn and grow; (3) a healthy start; (4) 
marketable skills through effective education; and (5) an opportunity 
to give back through community service. Hundreds of communities and 
organizations have made commitments to reaching these goals. OJJDP has 
been supporting those commitments through its various programs and 
initiatives over the past 2 years but now will commit funding support 
to America's Promise, to enhance the program's focus on volunteerism, 
and to support further coordination and expansion of existing community 
resources, service programs, and initiatives that address the needs of 
the Nation's children and youth.
    The program will be implemented by America's Promise. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Arts and At-Risk Youth
    OJJDP will provide continuation funding for an afterschool and 
summer arts program that combines the arts with job training and 
conflict resolution skills. This project includes summer jobs or paid 
internships to enable youth to put into practice the job and conflict 
resolution skills they are learning. By combining the arts with 
practical life experiences, at-risk youth gain valuable insights into 
their own abilities and the possibilities that await them in the world 
of work if they continue to attend school, study, and graduate. The 
goal of this program is to prevent and reduce the incidence of juvenile 
delinquency, crime, and other problem behaviors (e.g., substance abuse, 
teen pregnancy, truancy, and dropping out of school) in at-risk youth 
14 to 17 years old by providing a multicomponent arts program that 
includes life skills training, the link between art and employment, and 
practical experiences in the workforce. In FY 1999, in collaboration 
with the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Safe and Drug-Free Schools 
Program of the U.S. Department of Education, the National Endowment for 
the Arts, and the U.S. Department of Labor, OJJDP awarded grants to 
three competitively selected communities (Chicago, IL; Philadelphia, 
PA; and Tulsa, OK) to develop and implement this pilot demonstration 
program in the arts. The grantees are receiving training and technical 
assistance support through a provider selected by the National 
Endowment for the Arts and OJJDP.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantees, Chicago, 
Philadelphia, and Tulsa. No additional applications will be solicited 
in FY 2000.
Arts Programs for Juvenile Offenders in Detention and Corrections
    OJJDP will provide continuation support for arts programs for youth 
in juvenile detention centers and corrections facilities. This 
initiative is designed to increase opportunities to establish visual, 
performing, media, and literacy artist-in-residence programs in 
juvenile detention centers and corrections facilities. The corrections 
and detention sites are encouraging the development of these programs 
by convening interested arts organizations and juvenile justice 
agencies to provide training in arts program development to three 
competitively selected demonstration sites (Gainesville, TX; Riviera 
Beach, FL; and Rochester, NY) and three competitively selected 
enhancement sites (Bronx, NY; Seattle, WA; and Whittier, CA). The 
demonstration sites will develop and implement new arts-based programs 
for adjudicated youth, and the enhancement sites will demonstrate 
practices that have achieved sustainable programs. In addition to being 
required

[[Page 71217]]

to provide juvenile offenders in detention and corrections facilities 
with arts programming, sites also are required to develop collaborative 
arts programs for youth returning to their communities. The grantees 
are receiving training and technical assistance support through a 
provider selected by the National Endowment for the Arts and OJJDP.
    This program will be implemented by the six current grantees. No 
additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Assessing Alcohol, Drug, and Mental Health Disorders Among Juvenile 
Detainees
    This project will supplement an ongoing National Institute of 
Mental Health longitudinal study assessing alcohol, drug, and mental 
health disorders among juveniles in detention in Cook County, Illinois. 
The project has three primary goals: (1) To determine how alcohol, 
drug, and mental disorders develop over time among juvenile detainees; 
(2) to investigate whether juvenile detainees receive needed 
psychiatric services after their cases reach disposition (and they are 
back in the community or serving sentences); and (3) to study the 
development of dangerous and risky behaviors related to violence, 
substance use, and HIV/AIDS. The study is investigating how violence, 
drug use, and HIV/AIDS risk behaviors develop over time, what the 
antecedents of these behaviors are, and how these behaviors are 
interrelated. This project is unique because the sample is so large: it 
includes 1,833 youth from Chicago who were arrested and interviewed 
between 1996 and 1998. The sample is stratified by gender, race 
(African American, non-Hispanic white, Hispanic), and age (10-13, 14-
17). Initial interviews have been completed, and extensive archival 
data (arrest and incarceration history, health and mental health 
treatment, etc.) collected on each subject. The investigators have been 
tracking the subjects, and are now beginning to reinterview the 
adolescents. Because of their extensive and thorough tracking 
procedures, the investigators will be able to reinterview subjects 
regardless of whether they are back in the community, incarcerated, or 
have left the immediate area. The large sample size will provide 
sufficient statistical power to study rarer disorders (especially 
comorbidity), patterns of drug use, and risky, life-threatening 
behaviors. OJJDP funding for this project began in FY 1998.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, 
Northwestern University. No additional applications will be solicited 
in FY 2000.
Communities In Schools, Inc.--Federal Interagency Partnership
    This program will continue an ongoing national school dropout 
prevention model developed and implemented by Communities In Schools, 
Inc. (CIS). CIS, Inc., provides training and technical assistance in 
adapting and implementing the CIS model in States and local 
communities. The model brings social, employment, mental health, drug 
prevention, entrepreneurship, and other resources to high-risk youth 
and their families in the school setting. Where they exist, CIS State 
organizations assume primary responsibility for local program 
replication during the Federal Interagency Partnership. The Partnership 
is based on enhancing (1) CIS, Inc., training and technical assistance 
capabilities; (2) CIS capability to introduce selected initiatives for 
youth at the local level; (3) the information dissemination capability 
of CIS; and (4) the capability of CIS to network with Federal agencies 
on behalf of State and local CIS programs. With OJJDP's support, CIS, 
Inc. will place a special focus within the CIS Network on family 
strengthening initiatives that benefit both youth and their families.
    The program will be implemented by the current grantee, Communities 
In Schools, Inc. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
A Demonstration Afterschool Program
    The Demonstration Afterschool Program was funded in FY 1998 as a 
pilot afterschool program to reduce juvenile delinquency and increase 
school retention. This program, known as Estrella, offers the basic 
building blocks that are critical for preventing juvenile delinquency 
and provides youth with a chance to succeed academically and physically 
in an environment that is conducive to learning. Through a curriculum 
of hands-on science and reading projects and supervised recreation, 
Estrella is providing a constructive alternative to afternoons of 
unsupervised free time. Elementary students are the target population 
for this effort. New Mexico Mathematics, Engineering, Science 
Achievement (NM MESA) provides the academic component of the program, 
and middle and high school students act as mentors to the elementary 
students in a highly interactive learning environment. The Regents of 
the University of New Mexico's Institute for Social Research designed 
this program and is evaluating it, using both qualitative and 
quantitative methods. This project is at two sites, Loma Linda and 
Desert Trail Schools in the Gadsden Independent School District, in Don 
Ana County, New Mexico, and serves approximately 50 middle school 
students and 100 elementary school students from the six Gadsden High 
School feeder schools.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Regents of the University of New Mexico. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Diffusion of State Risk- and Protective-Factor-Focused Prevention
    Since FY 1997, OJJDP has provided funds to the National Institute 
on Drug Abuse, through an interagency agreement, to support this 5-year 
study of the public health approach to prevention, focusing on risk and 
protective factors for substance abuse at the State and community 
levels. The study is identifying factors that influence the adoption of 
the public health approach and assessing the association between this 
approach and the levels of risk and protective factors and substance 
abuse among adolescents. The study will also examine State substance 
abuse data gathered from 1988 through 2001 and use interviews to 
describe the process of implementing the epidemiological risk- and 
protective-factor approach in Colorado, Kansas, Illinois, Maine, 
Oregon, Utah, and Washington.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the Social 
Development Research Group at the University of Washington School of 
Social Work. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Evaluation of the Truancy Reduction Demonstration Program
    In FY 1999, OJJDP awarded funds to eight sites around the country 
to implement truancy reduction projects. These sites included Athens, 
GA; Contra Costa, CA; Honolulu, HI ; Houston, TX; Jacksonville, FL; 
King County, WA; Suffolk County, NY; and Tacoma, WA. Grantees represent 
a diversity of models and geographic locations. OJJDP also selected the 
Colorado Foundation for Families and Children (CFFC) to conduct the 
national evaluation of the Truancy Reduction Demonstration Program. As 
part of the evaluation, CFFC will (1) determine how community 
collaboration can impact truancy reduction and lead to systemic reform, 
and (2) assist OJJDP in the development of a community collaborative 
truancy reduction program model and identify the essential

[[Page 71218]]

elements of that model. To this end, CFFC is helping project sites to 
further identify and document the nature of the truancy problem in 
their communities, enhance the process of effective truancy reduction 
planning and collaboration, and incorporate that process into the 
implementation of the Truancy Reduction Demonstration Program at each 
site. In addition, CFFC is assisting sites in collecting information on 
truant youth and documenting services. The project is scheduled to last 
3\1/2\ years.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, Colorado 
Foundation for Families and Children. No additional applications will 
be solicited in FY 2000.
Intergenerational Transmission of Antisocial Behavior Project
    The purpose of this project is to expand on the Rochester Youth 
Development Study by examining the development of antisocial behavior 
and delinquency in the children of the original Rochester, NY, subjects 
of OJJDP's Program of Research on the Causes and Correlates of 
Delinquency. By age 21, 40 percent of the original Rochester subjects 
were parents. This provides a unique opportunity to examine and track 
the development of delinquent behavior across three generations in a 
particularly high-risk sample. Results of the study should provide 
useful findings with policy implications for prevention programs. The 
program is being funded under an FY 1998 interagency agreement between 
OJJDP and the National Institute of Mental Health.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, SUNY 
Research Foundation. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Investing in Youth for a Safer Future--A Public Education Campaign
    OJJDP will continue its support, which began in FY 1997, of the 
National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC) advertising campaign Investing 
in Youth for A Safer Future through the transfer of funds to the Bureau 
of Justice Assistance (BJA) under an intra-agency agreement. OJJDP and 
BJA are working with the NCPC Media Unit to produce, disseminate, and 
support effective public service advertising and related media to 
inform the public of effective solutions to juvenile crime and to 
motivate young people and adults to get involved and support these 
solutions. The featured solutions include effective prevention programs 
and intervention strategies.
    The program will be administered by the Bureau of Justice 
Assistance through its existing grant to the National Crime Prevention 
Council. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Multisite, Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention 
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    OJJDP will transfer funds under an interagency agreement with the 
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) to support this research, 
funded principally by NIMH. In 1992, NIMH began a study of the long-
term efficacy of stimulant medication and intensive behavioral and 
educational treatment for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity 
disorder (ADHD). Although ADHD is classified as a childhood disorder, 
up to 70 percent of afflicted children continue to experience symptoms 
in adolescence and adulthood. The study will continue through 2000 and 
will follow the original families and a comparison group. OJJDP's 
participation, which began in FY 1998, will allow for investigation 
into the subjects' delinquent behavior and contact with the legal 
system, including arrests and court referrals.
    OJJDP will support this study through an interagency agreement with 
the National Institute of Mental Health. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
National Center for Conflict Resolution Education
    Funded under a competitively awarded cooperative agreement in FY 
1995, the National Center for Conflict Resolution Education works to 
integrate conflict resolution education (CRE) programming into all 
levels of education in schools, juvenile facilities, and youth-serving 
organizations. In FY 1998, OJJDP entered into a partnership with the 
U.S. Department of Education to expand and enhance this project. The 
grantee provides training and technical assistance through onsite 
training and consultation for teams from schools, communities, and 
juvenile facilities; by providing resource materials including Conflict 
Resolution Education: A Guide to Implementing Programs in Schools, 
Youth-Serving Organizations, and Community and Juvenile Justice 
Settings and an enhanced, interactive CD-ROM that teaches conflict 
resolution skills through the presentation of real-life situations that 
confront young people; and by partnering with State-level agencies to 
establish State training institutes and otherwise build local capacity 
to implement successful CRE programs for youth. The Center also 
facilitates peer-to-peer mentoring.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Illinois State Bar Association--Illinois LEARN. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Partnerships for Preventing Violence
    This program will continue for a second year in a multiple funding 
agreement among OJJDP, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services to provide support for distance 
training using satellite videoconferencing as the medium. The project, 
funded under a 3-year grant, consists of a series of six live, 
interactive satellite training broadcasts that focus on violence 
prevention programs and strategies that have proven promising or 
effective. The training is targeted to school and community violence 
prevention personnel, health care providers, law enforcement officials, 
and other service providers representing a variety of community-based 
and youth-serving organizations. To date, three events have been held 
with a fourth planned by October 15, 1999.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, Harvard 
University School of Public Health. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Proactive Youth Program
    In FY 1998, OJJDP funded the New Mexico Proactive Youth Program. 
The New Mexico Police Activities League (PAL) has implemented a 
statewide prevention project consisting of recreational, educational, 
and cultural activities for at-risk youth and their families. The goal 
of this effort is to reduce negative behavior and promote healthy 
behavioral patterns among New Mexico's youth by providing activities 
that unite youth with law enforcement officers, educators, and other 
positive adult role models. PAL programs and activities are open to all 
youth between the ages of 5 and 18 and their families. Special outreach 
efforts are made to target at-risk youth, including children from 
persistently low-income families, children with incarcerated family 
members, Native American youth living on reservations, and juveniles 
involved in gang activities. Local PAL programs have been initiated in 
the following New Mexico communities: Bloomfield, Cochiti, Gallup, Las 
Cruces, Lordsburg, Roswell, Santa Fe, and Tohatchi. During FY 2000, 
additional programs will be developed in Clovis, Grants, and Silver 
City and in Dona Ana County. This

[[Page 71219]]

program is being evaluated by the Regents of the University of New 
Mexico's Institute for Social Research. The research design includes a 
process and outcome evaluation that will document and assess the 
implementation, effectiveness, and impact of this program.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Regents of the University of New Mexico. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Professional Development in Effective Classroom and Conflict Management
    This North Carolina pilot initiative was designed to improve 
classroom management and to assist in the creation of safe learning 
environments. Funds will be awarded in FY 2000 to the current grantee, 
the Center for the Study of School Violence, to complete the initial 
phase of its pilot in partnership with the University of North Carolina 
and the North Carolina State Board of Education. The purpose of the 
pilot program is to increase the ability of teachers and administrators 
to model and use sound conflict resolution practices by integrating 
skills training into preservice curriculums at North Carolina schools 
of education and by working with the North Carolina State Board of 
Education to change curriculum requirements to include conflict 
resolution skills training in the context of effective classroom 
management.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, the Center 
for the Study of School Violence. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Risk Reduction Via Promotion of Youth Development
    This program, also known as Early Alliance, is a large-scale 
prevention study involving hundreds of African American and Caucasian 
children in several elementary schools in lower socioeconomic 
neighborhoods of Columbia, SC. This project is designed to promote 
coping-competence and reduce risk for conduct problems, aggression, 
substance use, delinquency and violence, and school failure beginning 
in early elementary school. Children are being followed longitudinally 
throughout the 5 years of the project. The program is funded through an 
interagency agreement with the National Institute of Mental Health 
(NIMH), whose grantee is the University of South Carolina. Funding has 
also been provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
    This program will be implemented under the interagency agreement 
with the National Institute of Mental Health by the current grantee, 
the University of South Carolina. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Strengthening Services for Chemically Involved Children, Youth, and 
Families
    The U.S. Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services (HHS) 
provide services to children affected by parental substance use or 
abuse. OJJDP administers this training and technical assistance 
program, which began in FY 1998, with funds transferred to OJJDP by 
HHS's Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 
through a cooperative agreement with the Child Welfare League of 
America (CWLA), a nonprofit organization. CWLA recognizes that children 
and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems are among 
the most at risk for developing an alcohol or other drug problem (AOD). 
Typically these children have more risk factors than other children and 
fewer protective factors. This is especially true of youth in 
residential placement who have often witnessed or committed violent 
acts, have been physically or psychologically abused, have experienced 
failure and truancy in school, and have mental health and substance 
abuse problems.
    Staff members in the residential child care system often have 
little or no substance abuse training. CWLA's 1997 AOD survey 
documented that less than 25 percent of State child welfare agencies 
provide training to group residential staffs on recognizing and dealing 
with AOD problems. What further complicates this matter is that 
partnerships between AOD programs and child welfare facilities rarely 
exist, creating a lack of coordinated services for children of 
substance abusers and/or for substance abusing youth in residential 
care.
    As a 2-year project, CWLA will identify five residential child 
welfare sites, one in each of the CWLA's five regions, to demonstrate 
the effectiveness of integrating AOD prevention/treatment strategies 
into existing child welfare and juvenile justice programs and services, 
in order to educate staff and improve outcomes for adolescents 
participating in the programs. CWLA will also provide technical 
assistance to other member agencies replicating the various program 
models identified through their evaluations of the programs.
    This jointly funded project will be implemented by CWLA. No 
additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Training and Technical Assistance Program for the Arts Programs for 
Juvenile Offenders in Detention and Corrections Initiative
    OJJDP is collaborating with the National Endowment for the Arts in 
providing the technical assistance program for the Arts Programs for 
Juvenile Offenders in Detention and Corrections Initiative. Grady 
Hillman has been awarded a grant to provide technical assistance in the 
area of art-based programming for juvenile offenders to support program 
development and implementation; provide ongoing technical assistance, 
and publish a document on the implementation of arts programming in 
juvenile corrections and detention. The technical assistance will be 
for the purpose of ensuring focused, professional technical support for 
program development and implementation, including program design, 
artist selection and training, and interaction between the arts 
organizations and the juvenile justice system. The technical assistance 
materials that will be developed through this national initiative will 
provide a blueprint for communities that seek to undertake similar 
programs. The nature of the Arts Programs for Juvenile Offenders in 
Detention and Corrections affords a unique opportunity to develop new 
programs and enhance existing programs while creating documentation 
instrumentations for the juvenile justice system. The sites provided 
technical assistance are Bronx, NY; Gainesville, TX; Riviera Beach, FL; 
Rochester, NY; Seattle, WA; and Whittier, California.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, Grady 
Hillman. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Truancy Reduction Demonstration Program
    In FY 1998, OJJDP, the Executive Office for Weed and Seed within 
the Office of Justice Programs, and the U.S. Department of Education 
jointly engaged in a grant program to address truancy. This program 
specifically outlines four major comprehensive components: (1) System 
reform and accountability, (2) a service continuum to address the needs 
of children and adolescents who are truant, (3) data collection and 
evaluation, and (4) a community education and awareness program from 
kindergarten through grade 12 that addresses the need to prevent 
truancy and to intervene with youth who are truant. The goals of this

[[Page 71220]]

program are to develop and implement or expand and strengthen 
comprehensive truancy programs that pool education, justice system, law 
enforcement, social services and community resources; identify truant 
youth; cooperatively design and implement comprehensive, systemwide 
programs to meet the needs of truants; and design and maintain systems 
for tracking truant youth. OJJDP has awarded funds for this program to 
eight sites: three non-Weed-and-Seed sites received up to $100,000 each 
(Honolulu, HI; Jacksonville, FL; and King County, WA), and five Weed 
and Seed sites received up to $50,000 each (Athens, GA; Houston, TX; 
Martinez, CA; Tacoma, WA; and Yaphank, NY). All sites are currently 
involved in a 6-month planning phase.
    It is anticipated that during the next 2 years, this program will 
focus on the development of implementation and evaluation plans that 
link youth and adolescents who are truant with community-based services 
and programs, as well as on a full implementation of the community's 
comprehensive systemwide plan to prevent and intervene with the problem 
of truancy. This program will be evaluated by the Colorado Foundation 
for Families and Children who will conduct a process evaluation that 
will identify factors contributing or impeding the successful 
implementation of a truancy program.
    Truancy activities will be carried out by the current grantees. No 
additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Strengthening the Juvenile Justice System
Balanced and Restorative Justice (BARJ) Training Project
    The BARJ project's goal is to control juvenile delinquency through 
increased use of restitution, community service, and other innovative 
programs as part of a jurisdictionwide juvenile justice change from 
traditional retributive or rehabilitative system models to balanced and 
restorative justice orientation and procedures. The specific steps for 
achieving this goal involve preparation of materials and training of 
personnel interested in restorative justice and the ``balanced 
approach.'' The steps also include providing onsite technical 
assistance to selected State and local jurisdictions committed to 
implementing the balanced approach. Materials development in FY 2000 
will include documents containing information on restorative justice 
programs, practices, and policy directions. The materials will be 
useful for training juvenile justice system practitioners and managers 
on the BARJ model and for onsite technical assistance. The training and 
technical assistance will be delivered at regional and national 
roundtables, juvenile justice conferences, and specialized workshops. 
``Training of trainers'' programs will also be offered. There will be 
some concentration of BARJ technical assistance at the State level and 
on advancing judges' and prosecutors' leadership in the area of 
restorative justice. Further, there will be an effort to involve 
corporations and foundations in supporting BARJ and initial exploration 
of introducing BARJ in higher education.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, Florida 
Atlantic University. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Building Blocks for Youth
    The goals of this initiative are to protect minority youth in the 
justice system and promote rational and effective juvenile justice 
policies. These goals are accomplished by the following components: (1) 
Conducting research on issues such as the impact on minority youth of 
new State laws and the implications of privatization of juvenile 
facilities by profit-making corporations; (2) undertaking an analysis 
of decisionmaking in the justice system and development of model 
decisionmaking criteria that reduce or eliminate disproportionate 
impact of the system on minority youth; (3) building a constituency for 
change at the national, State, and local levels; and (4) developing 
communication strategies for dissemination of information. A fifth 
component, direct advocacy for minority youth, is funded by sources 
other than OJJDP. Funding by OJJDP began in FY 1998. Youth Law Center 
has undertaken tasks to move this initiative forward and will require 
additional time and funding to complete the initial identified goals.
    This continuation will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Youth Law Center. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement
    In FY 1997, the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) 
replaced the biennial Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, 
Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, known as the Children in Custody 
census. CJRP collects detailed information on the population of 
juveniles who are in juvenile residential placement facilities as a 
result of contact with the juvenile justice system. New methods 
developed for CJRP are expected to produce more accurate, timely, and 
useful data on the juvenile population, with less reporting burden for 
facility respondents. The CJRP was conducted for the second time in 
October 1999. Data collection efforts will continue into 2000. OJJDP 
anticipates delivery of the final data file by the end of FY 2000.
    This program will be implemented through an existing interagency 
agreement with the Bureau of the Census. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Center for Students With Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice System
    During FY 1999, OJJDP undertook a joint initiative with the Office 
of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of 
Education to establish a Center for Students with Disabilities in the 
Juvenile Justice System. The Secretary of Education and the Attorney 
General expect this project to have a significant impact on the 
improvement of juvenile justice system services for students with 
disabilities. Improvements in the areas of prevention, educational 
services, and reintegration based on a combination of research, 
training, and technical assistance will lead to improved results for 
children and youth with disabilities. The Center for Students with 
Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice System will provide guidance and 
assistance to States, schools, justice programs, families, and 
communities to design, implement, and evaluate comprehensive 
educational programs, based on research-validated practices, for 
students with disabilities who are within the juvenile justice system.
    This program will be implemented by the University of Maryland 
through an award by the U.S. Department of Education. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Circles of Care Program
    In FY 1998, the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) initiated 
a program entitled ``Circles of Care'' to build the capacity of 
selected Native American Tribes to develop a continuum of care for 
Native American youth at risk of mental health, substance abuse, and 
delinquency problems. As part of multiyear joint efforts with CMHS, 
OJJDP entered into a 3-year interagency agreement to provide funding 
support to the Circles of Care Program. OJJDP transferred funds in FY's 
1998 and 1999 to CMHS to support the funding of one of nine sites. The

[[Page 71221]]

Circles of Care Program is designed to facilitate the planning and 
development of a continuum of care.
    The currently funded projects will continue in FY 2000 through an 
interagency agreement with the Center for Mental Health Services. No 
additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Community Assessment Center
    The Community Assessment Center (CAC) program is a multicomponent 
demonstration initiative designed to test the efficacy of the CAC 
concept. CAC's provide a 24-hour centralized point of intake and 
assessment for juveniles who have or are likely to come into contact 
with the juvenile justice system. The main purpose of a CAC is to 
facilitate earlier and more efficient prevention and intervention 
service delivery at the ``front end'' of the juvenile justice system. 
In FY 1997, OJJDP funded two planning grants and two enhancement grants 
to existing assessment centers for a 1-year project period, a CAC 
evaluation, and a technical assistance component.
    Based on a limited competition among the four sites, in FY 1998, 
OJJDP provided additional funding for 12 months to one of the initial 
planning sites (Lee County Sheriff's Office in Lee County, FL) and to 
one of the initial enhancement sites (Jefferson Center for Mental 
Health in Jefferson County, CO). The two other sites (Human Service 
Associates, Inc. (HSA) in Orlando, FL, and the Denver Juvenile Court in 
Denver, CO) received increased funding from Juvenile Accountability 
Incentive Block Grant funds to develop a fully operational CAC, 
including all four CAC conceptual elements. Increased funding was also 
provided to the national evaluator, the National Council on Crime and 
Delinquency.
    During year 2, the Lee County Sheriff's Office worked to design and 
implement a comprehensive management information system that will serve 
as the backbone of the future assessment center. The Jefferson Center 
for Mental Health further enhanced its assessment center by conducting 
an intensive review of existing assessment tools and enhancing the case 
management process. In addition, both Denver and Orlando (HSA) began 
developing fully operational CAC's.
    In FY 2000, OJJDP will provide additional funding to support the 
full implementation of OJJDP's CAC concept to the current grantees in 
Denver and Orlando. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Comprehensive Children and Families Mental Health Training and 
Technical Assistance
    Under an FY 1999 interagency agreement, OJJDP transferred funds to 
the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) to support the new 
contract for training and technical assistance for the CMHS-funded 
Comprehensive Mental Health sites. These funds will be used to enhance 
the involvement of the juvenile justice system in the systems of care 
that are being developed in each of the CMHS-funded sites. Funds will 
again be transferred to CMHS in FY 2000 to support the training and 
technical assistance and to meet the terms of the 3-year interagency 
agreement.
    OJJDP will support this initiative through an interagency agreement 
with the Center for Mental Health Services. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Development of the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and 
Chronic Juvenile Offenders
    OJJDP has been providing support for development of its 
Comprehensive Strategy for several years. This project will complete 
ongoing strategic planning efforts in two States, Oregon and Wisconsin, 
and provide implementation support in six States that have completed 
the strategic planning process. OJJDP will also explore the addition of 
two or more Comprehensive Strategy States in FY 2000. As in the 
original eight States, up to six local jurisdictions will be identified 
to receive Comprehensive Strategy planning training and technical 
assistance. OJJDP will continue to provide technical assistance to 
further assist States and local jurisdictions, through training and 
technical assistance, in developing and implementing the Comprehensive 
Strategy. Further development and update of the Guide for Implementing 
the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile 
Offenders will be completed in FY 2000.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantees, the 
National Council on Crime and Delinquency and Developmental Research 
and Programs, Inc. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Evaluation of the Department of Labor's Education and Training for 
Youthful Offenders Initiative
    This evaluation will document the activities undertaken by two 
States awarded grants under the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL's) 
Education and Training for Youthful Offenders Initiative. Each DOL 
grantee will provide comprehensive school-to-work education and 
training within a juvenile correctional facility and followup and job 
placement services as youth return to the community. It is intended 
that the comprehensive services developed under these grants will serve 
as models for other juvenile correctional facilities across the 
country.
    The OJJDP-sponsored evaluation of these projects will be conducted 
in two phases. During Phase I, a process evaluation will be conducted 
at each site to document the extent to which educational, job training, 
and aftercare services were enhanced with DOL funding. Also, the 
feasibility of conducting an impact evaluation at each site will be 
determined during Phase I. Phase II will entail conducting an impact 
evaluation at one or both sites. For those sites where a rigorous 
impact evaluation can be conducted, the effects of the program on job-
related skills, employment, earnings, academic performance, and 
recidivism will be measured.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Council on Crime and Delinquency. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Evaluation of the Intensive Community-Based Aftercare Program
    In FY 1995, OJJDP competitively awarded a grant to the National 
Council on Crime and Delinquency to perform a process evaluation and 
design an outcome evaluation of the Intensive Community-Based Aftercare 
Demonstration and Technical Assistance Program. In FY 1998, the project 
was supplemented and extended for an additional 2 years to continue the 
outcome evaluation, which seeks to determine the extent of the 
differences between the Intensive Community-Based Aftercare Program 
(IAP) participants and the ``regular'' parolees, the supervision and 
services provided to both groups, and the cost-effectiveness of IAP. 
Data collection is being accomplished using several methods including 
searching State police records to measure recidivism and analyzing 
State agency and juvenile court data to estimate costs.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Council on Crime and Delinquency. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Evaluation of Teen Courts
    This project, which OJJDP began in FY 1997, is measuring the effect 
of

[[Page 71222]]

handling young, relatively nonserious law violators in teen courts 
rather than in traditional juvenile or family courts. Researchers are 
collecting data on several dimensions of program outcomes, including 
postprogram recidivism and changes in teens' perceptions of justice and 
their ability to make more mature judgments. Analyses of these 
dimensions will be used to compare youth handled in at least three 
separate teen court programs with those processed by the traditional 
juvenile justice system. In addition, the study will conduct a process 
evaluation of the teen court programs, exploring legal, administrative, 
and case processing factors that affect the ability of the programs to 
achieve their goals.
    This evaluation will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Urban Institute. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Helping Communities To Promote Youth Development
    OJJDP will continue to provide support to the Institute of 
Medicine/National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences for a 
review and synthesis of existing evidence regarding the effectiveness 
of community-level interventions and service programs designed to 
promote positive youth development. The strengths and limitations of 
measurement and methodologies used to evaluate these interventions will 
be assessed, as well as policy and programmatic implications of this 
research. In addition to a final report that will synthesize the work 
of the committee, brief summary ``fact sheets'' will be widely 
disseminated to policymakers, local decisionmakers, program 
administrators, service providers, researchers, community organizers, 
and other key stakeholders.
    OJJDP will implement this program through an interagency agreement 
with the National Academy of Sciences. No additional applications will 
be solicited in FY 2000.
Intensive Community-Based Aftercare Dissemination and Technical 
Assistance Program
    This initiative supports implementation, training and technical 
assistance, and an independent evaluation of an intensive community-
based aftercare model in three competitively selected demonstration 
sites. The overall goal of the intensive aftercare model is to identify 
and assist high-risk juvenile offenders to make a gradual transition 
from secure confinement back into the community. The Intensive 
Aftercare Program (IAP) model has three distinct, yet overlapping 
segments: (1) Prerelease and preparatory planning activities during 
incarceration, (2) structured transitioning involving the participation 
of institutional and aftercare staffs both prior to and following 
community reentry, and (3) long-term reintegrative activities to ensure 
adequate service delivery and the required level of social control. The 
three sites will complete 5 years of program development and 
implementation in FY 2000. Followup data collection will continue into 
FY 2000 to capture information on youth who transitioned back into the 
community. In late FY 1999, Johns Hopkins University, the current 
grantee, will shift its focus from primarily providing training and 
technical assistance to grantees to developing a comprehensive 
dissemination, training, and technical assistance effort to State 
juvenile justice systems throughout the United States.
    The IAP project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Johns Hopkins University. No additional applications will be solicited 
in FY 1999.
Juvenile Defender Training, Technical Assistance, and Resource Center
    In FY 1999, OJJDP competitively funded the American Bar Association 
(ABA) to develop and implement the Juvenile Defender Training, 
Technical Assistance, and Resource Center (Juvenile Defender Center) to 
support training and technical assistance and to serve as a 
clearinghouse and resource center for juvenile defenders in this 
country. Recognizing that a lack of training, technical assistance, and 
resources for juvenile defenders weakens the juvenile justice system 
and results in a lack of due process for juvenile offenders, OJJDP 
provided seed money in FY 1999 to fund the initial planning and 
implementation of a Juvenile Defender Center. The grantee is expected 
to develop a partnership with other agencies and organizations that 
will provide or help develop financial resources to assist in 
sustaining a permanent Center. The Center will be designed to provide 
both general and specialized training and technical assistance to 
juvenile defenders in the United States. The design will also 
incorporate a resource center for purposes such as serving as a 
repository for the most recent litigation on key issues, a collection 
of sample briefs, and information on expert witnesses.
    This project will be carried out by the current grantee, the 
American Bar Association. No additional applications will be solicited 
in FY 2000.
Juvenile Justice Prosecution Unit
    This American Prosecutors Research Institute project's goal is to 
increase and improve prosecutor involvement in juvenile justice. The 
Project will pursue continuing needs assessment by a working group of 
experienced prosecutors regarding district attorney requirements in the 
juvenile area. The project will design and present specialized training 
events for elected and appointed district attorneys and for juvenile 
unit chiefs. The training will deal with prosecutor leadership roles in 
the juvenile justice system and with the clarification or resolution of 
important juvenile justice issues. Such issues are expected to include 
juvenile policy, code revisions, resource allocation, charging, 
transfer to criminal courts, alternative juvenile programs, 
confinement, record confidentiality, and collaboration with other 
agencies. Training will also address certain evolving juvenile justice 
areas, such as community prosecution, community justice, restorative 
justice, community assessment centers, and mental health concerns, 
among others. In addition, the project will continue to develop 
training and reference materials pertaining to significant juvenile 
justice topics.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
American Prosecutors Research Institute. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Juvenile Residential Facility Census
    As part of a long-term relationship with the Bureau of the Census, 
OJJDP will continue to fund the development and testing of a new census 
of juvenile residential facilities. This census will focus on those 
facilities that are authorized to hold juveniles based on contact with 
the juvenile justice system. From interviews with facility 
administrators and staff at 20 locations, project staff have produced a 
detailed report discussing how best to capture information on 
education, mental health and substance abuse treatment, health 
services, conditions of custody, staffing, and facility capacity. 
Project staff have also drafted and tested a questionnaire based on the 
interview results. The census was tested in October 1998. Census Bureau 
staff will prepare a report on the results of this test and make 
specific recommendations concerning changes and census implementation. 
In 2000, OJJDP and Census will work together to finalize the census 
format and data collection methods. The census will be administered for 
the first time in October 2000.

[[Page 71223]]

    This project will be conducted through an interagency agreement 
with the Bureau of the Census, Governments Division and Statistical 
Research Division. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
Linking Balanced and Restorative Justice and Adolescents (LIBRA)
    This project addresses effective interventions with the at-risk and 
delinquent youthful population of Vermont, combined with Vermont's 
determination to raise, support, teach, and nurture youth in their 
communities. As a rural state, Vermont faces many of the same issues 
plaguing larger, urban States, including underage drinking, drug abuse, 
education failure, and mental health issues. The goal of this program 
is to continue development of a comprehensive, integrated, balanced, 
and restorative system of justice for youthful offenders that holds 
them accountable for their actions to victims, protects the community, 
builds offender skills and competencies, and offers opportunities for 
positive connections to community members. OJJDP funding for the 
program began in FY 1998. Based on the Balanced and Restorative Justice 
(BARJ) philosophy of reparation, rather than retribution, the LIBRA 
project has created a network of Juvenile Reparative Boards, which hold 
youth immediately accountable for their actions and provide direct 
services to youth, parents, victims, and community members. The project 
will also continue to pilot Community Justice Centers, which 
demonstrate that the community is the core of the justice process and 
recognize youth as a vital part of the community. Also, a curriculum of 
Competency Training Classes for youthful offenders and youth at risk of 
delinquency will be maintained and will focus on conflict resolution, 
social skills, problem solving, and decisionmaking.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Vermont Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Longitudinal Study To Examine the Development of Conduct Disorder in 
Girls
    The purpose of this project is to examine the development of 
conduct disorder in a sample of 2,500 inner-city girls who are ages 6 
to 8 at the beginning of the study. The study will follow the girls 
annually for 5 years and will provide information that is critical to 
the understanding of the etiology, comorbidity, and prognosis of 
conduct disorder in girls. This project is important because 
delinquency in girls has been steadily increasing over the past decade 
and a better understanding of the developmental processes in girls will 
help in identifying effective means of prevention and provide direction 
for juvenile justice responses to delinquent girls. The program is 
being funded under an FY 1999 interagency agreement between OJJDP and 
the National Institute of Mental Health.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
University of Pittsburgh. No additional applications will be solicited 
in FY 2000.
National Juvenile Justice Data Analysis Project
    In 1998, OJJDP established the National Juvenile Justice Data 
Analysis Project (NJJDAP) to serve the critical information needs of 
the juvenile justice community and OJJDP. The NJJDAP produces analyses 
and disseminates statistical information to the public and to State and 
local policymakers. The project serves as a principal resource to 
accentuate and enhance OJJDP's ability to provide quality information 
to the field of juvenile justice. The project uses many national data 
sources to examine issues critical to the juvenile justice system. The 
data sources used are not limited to criminal justice or juvenile 
justice data. In 1999, the NJJDAP has produced analyses based on the 
National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY), operated by the Bureau of 
Labor Statistics. The NLSY is a national self-report survey of youth 
that includes several measures of juvenile offending. Also, the NJJDAP 
has produced analyses of the Census of Juveniles in Residential 
Placement.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Center for Juvenile Justice. No additional applications will 
be solicited in FY 2000.
National Juvenile Justice Program Directory
    To conduct its statistical functions, OJJDP must maintain a current 
and accurate list of all entities surveyed either in the various 
censuses or in surveys. This list currently consists of a complete list 
of juvenile residential facilities and a list of juvenile probation 
offices. As OJJDP expands its statistical work, it will need to expand 
this listing as well. The list needs to contain contact information for 
the various facilities or agencies and appropriate information for 
sampling. During 2000, the Census Bureau will continue to maintain the 
currently available portions of the directory and will explore 
expansions needed to monitor other areas of juvenile justice such as 
nonresidential correctional programs and juvenile court staff.
    This project will be conducted through an interagency agreement 
with the Bureau of the Census, Governments Division. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 97
    OJJDP will continue to support the third round of data collection, 
begun in FY 1997, by the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 97 
(NLSY97) through an interagency agreement with the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics (BLS). The NLSY97 is studying school-to-work transition in a 
nationally representative sample of 8,700 youth ages 12 to 16 years 
old. BLS is also collecting data on the involvement of these youth in 
antisocial and other behavior that may affect their transition to 
productive work careers. The survey provides information about risk and 
protective factors related to the initiation, persistence, and 
desistance of delinquent and criminal behavior and provides an 
opportunity to determine the generalizability of findings from OJJDP's 
Program of Research on the Causes and Correlates of Delinquency and 
other longitudinal studies to a nationally representative population of 
youth.
    The program will be implemented by the BLS under an interagency 
agreement. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Performance-Based Standards for Juvenile Correction and Detention 
Facilities
    Performance-Based Standards for Juvenile Correction and Detention 
Facilities Program, which began with a competitive OJJDP cooperative 
agreement awarded to the Council of Juvenile Correctional 
Administrators (CJCA) in FY 1995, has developed a performance 
management system for the management of juvenile correctional 
facilities. The system provides tools for monitoring and improving 
outcomes in six critical facility functions: providing security, 
safety, order, health care, educational, and mental health programming 
within a context that protects individual rights. Currently, 32 
facilities, including 2 State systems, have begun the implementation 
process, which consists of the data collection and analysis of baseline 
data; the development of an initial facility improvement plan, which 
may include financial support to make improvements; and reassessment 
and revision of the facility improvement

[[Page 71224]]

plan. During FY 2000, the program itself is undergoing refinements to 
improve management of the process for the facilities. In addition, 
approximately 15 new sites will begin the process, using streamlined 
data collection and new diagnostic tools. In addition to working with 
the participating facilities during this funding period, the project 
will finalize the implementation model; revise instruments, as needed; 
and develop criteria for determining full implementation, including the 
testing of community release measures. Where appropriate, the project 
will establish performance benchmarks and develop analytical reports 
regarding facility and system change that has occurred in the test 
sites.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
San Francisco Juvenile Justice Local Action Plan--Delancy Street 
Initiative
    In FY 1998, OJJDP provided funding to the City and County of San 
Francisco, CA, to support the implementation of a comprehensive effort 
to reform the city's juvenile justice system. San Francisco's 
Comprehensive Juvenile Justice Local Action Plan, facilitated by the 
Delancy Street Foundation CIRCLE (Coalition to Revitalize Communities, 
Lives and Environments), represents the culmination of a unique, 
collaborative needs assessment of the existing juvenile justice system. 
Based on this assessment, San Francisco identified six of the most 
critical gaps in the juvenile justice system and proposed programs to 
fill those gaps: Community Assessment and Referral Center, Early Risk 
and Resiliency, Safe Haven, Safe Corridor, the Life Learning Academy, 
and the Life Learning Residential Center for Girls. These six programs 
originated from the needs assessment and are a product of teams 
composed of representatives from San Francisco and its diverse 
communities.
    In FY 1999, OJJDP provided funding to enhance services offered at 
the Life Learning Residential Center (Academy), an intensive life-
changing, day treatment program designed to turn around the lives of 
youth with multiple problems that include multigenerational poverty, 
gang involvement, drug abuse, disciplinary problems, and school 
dropouts and failure. The Academy aims to strengthen a youth's bond 
with his family and extended family and the community, while providing 
complete ``life learning'' instruction and education. Funding will also 
be used for program replication throughout the country.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the City 
and County of San Francisco, in FY 2000. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.
Survey of Juvenile Probation
    OJJDP will continue to support the development of a survey of 
juvenile probation offices. This survey will lead directly to national 
estimates of the numbers of juveniles on probation at a given time. 
OJJDP began this effort in 1996 with assessments of current knowledge 
of probation and the need for information on this aspect of juvenile 
justice. The development efforts have so far included site visits to 
three State probation departments and local probation departments in 
those States. An additional seven States will be visited in the coming 
year. Based on this information, the Center for Survey Methods Research 
(CSMR) at the Bureau of the Census will develop a survey methodology 
and a survey questionnaire. The plans for this survey have expanded by 
necessity to include efforts (already under way under a separate 
agreement with the Bureau of the Census) to list and categorize 
juvenile probation offices nationally. Working with OJJDP, the Census 
Bureau will develop a list of probation offices and several 
categorizations of these offices to facilitate the development of a 
sampling scheme. In the coming year, OJJDP and the Census Bureau will 
continue working on the specifications for this list and continue 
efforts to develop the list. Also, working with the Governments 
Division of the Bureau of the Census, OJJDP will continue to take the 
steps needed to implement the survey. OJJDP anticipates the first 
Survey of Juvenile Probation will take place in calendar year 2002.
    This project will be conducted through an interagency agreement 
with the Bureau of the Census. No additional applications will be 
solicited in FY 2000.
Technical Assistance to Native American Tribes and Alaskan Native 
Communities
    The Technical Assistance to Native American Tribes and Alaskan 
Native Communities Program is designed to equip tribal governments with 
the necessary information and tools to enhance or develop 
comprehensive, systemwide approaches to reduce juvenile delinquency, 
violence, and victimization and increase the safety of their 
communities. In FY 1997, OJJDP awarded a 3-year cooperative agreement 
to the American Indian Development Associates (AIDA) to provide 
training and technical assistance to Indian nations seeking to improve 
juvenile justice services to children, youth, and families.
    Throughout FY's 1998 and 1999, AIDA continued to provide technical 
assistance to Indian nations and developed information materials for 
Indian juvenile justice practitioners, administrators, and 
policymakers. Topic areas covered Indian youth gangs; personnel 
competency building, such as conducting effective preadjudication 
investigations and preparing reports; developing protocols to implement 
State Children's Code provisions that affect Native American children; 
establishing sustainable, comprehensive community-based planning 
processes that focus on the needs of tribal youth; and developing and 
implementing culturally relevant policies, programs, and practices. The 
technical assistance and materials also addressed the overlapping roles 
and jurisdiction of Federal, State, and tribal justice systems, 
particularly in understanding the laws and public policies applicable 
to or effective in Indian communities.
    In FY 2000, OJJDP will continue to promote and provide technical 
assistance to tribes seeking to develop and enhance their juvenile 
justice systems. AIDA will provide training and technical assistance in 
the following emphasis areas: Developing a community-based secondary 
prevention program; developing a tribal justice probation system; 
developing multidisciplinary approaches to youth gang violence 
prevention; establishing risk assessment and classification systems; 
developing comprehensive strategies to handle offenders; expanding 
referral and service delivery systems; developing cooperative 
interagency and intergovernmental relationships; and developing 
technology to improve systems and increased access to juvenile justice 
information.
    This program will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
American Indian Development Associates. No additional applications will 
be solicited in FY 2000.
TeenSupreme Career Preparation Initiative
    In FY 1998, OJJDP, in partnership with the U.S. Department of 
Labor's (DOL's) Employment and Training Administration, provided 
funding support to the Boys & Girls Clubs of America to demonstrate and 
evaluate the TeenSupreme Career Preparation Initiative. This initiative 
provides

[[Page 71225]]

employment training and other related services to at-risk youth through 
local Boys & Girls Clubs with TeenSupreme Centers. In FY 1998, DOL 
funds supported program staffing in the existing 41 TeenSupreme 
Centers, and in 1999, the number of sites was expanded to 45. These 45 
clubs are provided funding support to hire an employment specialist to 
work with the youth. Boys & Girls Clubs of America provides intensive 
training and technical assistance to each site and administrative and 
staffing support to the program from the national office. OJJDP funds 
support the evaluation component of the program, which is being 
implemented by an independent evaluator.
    This jointly funded Department of Labor and OJJDP initiative will 
be implemented by the current grantee, the Boys & Girls Clubs of 
America. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 1999.
Training and Technical Support for State and Local Jurisdictional Teams 
To Focus on Juvenile Corrections and Detention Overcrowding
    Through systemic change within local juvenile detention systems or 
statewide juvenile corrections systems, this project seeks to reduce 
overcrowding in facilities where juveniles are held. Competitively 
awarded in FY 1994 to the National Juvenile Detention Association 
(NJDA), in partnership with the San Francisco Youth Law Center, the 
project provides training and technical assistance materials for use by 
State and local jurisdictional teams. NJDA selected three jurisdictions 
(Camden, NJ; Oklahoma City, OK; and the Rhode Island Juvenile 
Corrections System) for onsite development, implementation, and testing 
of procedures to reduce crowding. All three original sites have 
completed their work. The grantee is exploring additional sites for 
comprehensive training and technical assistance in FY 2000. NJDA will 
also be initiating its Jurisdictional Team Training Course in FY 2000 
at three sites that are experiencing overcrowding in their juvenile 
facilities.
    This project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
National Juvenile Detention Association. No additional applications 
will be solicited in FY 2000.

Child Abuse and Neglect and Dependency Courts

National Evaluation of the Safe Kids/Safe Streets Program
    OJJDP will continue funding the grant competitively awarded in FY 
1997 to Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD, for a national evaluation to 
document and explicate the process of community mobilization, planning, 
and collaboration that has taken place before and during the Safe Kids/
Safe Streets awards; to inform program staff of performance levels on 
an ongoing basis; and to determine the effectiveness of the implemented 
programs in achieving the goals of the Safe Kids/Safe Streets program. 
The initial 18-month grant began a process evaluation and an assessment 
of the feasibility of an impact evaluation. Westat will continue the 
process evaluation, which will now focus on tracking the implementation 
efforts at each of the sites; continue developing the national impact 
evaluation; and continue working with local evaluators to develop their 
capacity to evaluate programs. Also, Westat will add a fifth site to 
the evaluation.
    This evaluation will be implemented by the current grantee, Westat, 
Inc. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Nurse Home Visitation
    In FY 2000, OJJDP will continue the integration of Prenatal and 
Early Childhood Nurse Home Visitation into five Operation Weed and Seed 
sites (Clearwater, FL; Fresno, CA; Los Angeles, CA; Oakland, CA; and 
Oklahoma City, OK) and one combined Weed and Seed/Safe Futures site 
(St. Louis, MO). Operation Weed and Seed is a national initiative to 
make communities safe through law enforcement activities and to rebuild 
crime-ridden communities across the country through social services and 
economic redevelopment. SafeFutures is an OJJDP initiative to assist in 
implementing comprehensive community programs designed to reduce youth 
violence, delinquency, and victimization through the creation of a 
continuum of care in communities. The integration of the Prenatal and 
Early Childhood Nurse Home Visitation Program is co-funded by OJJDP, 
OJP's Executive Office for Weed and Seed, and the U.S. Department of 
Health and Human Services.
    Several rigorous studies of the Prenatal and Early Childhood Nurse 
Home Visitation Program model indicate that it reduces the risks for 
early antisocial behavior and prevents problems associated with youth 
crime and delinquency, such as child abuse, maternal substance abuse, 
and maternal criminal involvement. A 15-year followup of the original 
Nurse Home Visitation program found that adolescents whose mothers 
received home visitation services over a decade earlier were less 
likely to have run away, been arrested, and been convicted of a crime 
than those whose mothers had not received a nurse home visitor. They 
also had lower levels of cigarette and alcohol use.
    The current program being implemented in the six sites targets low 
income, first-time mothers and their infants to accomplish three goals: 
(1) Improve pregnancy outcomes by helping women alter their health-
related behaviors, including use of cigarettes, alcohol and drugs; 
improve their nutrition; and reduce risk factors for premature 
delivery; (2) improve child health and development by helping parents 
provide more responsible and competent care for their children; and (3) 
improve families' economic self-sufficiency by helping parents develop 
a vision for their own future, plan future pregnancies, continue their 
education, and find work.
    The project will be implemented by the current grantee, the 
University of Colorado Health Services Center. No additional 
applications will be solicited in FY 2000.
Research on Child Neglect
    In FY 2000, OJJDP will continue to join several other Federal 
agencies, including the Office of Justice Program's National Institute 
of Justice, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Department of 
Health and Human Services' National Institutes of Health and 
Administration on Children, Youth, and Families (the Neglect 
Consortium), in funding research projects that will enhance 
understanding of the etiology, extent, services, treatment, management, 
and prevention of child neglect. This multiagency effort addresses the 
lack of research focusing specifically on the issue of child neglect. 
Child neglect may relate to profound health consequences, place 
children at higher risk for a variety of diseases and conditions, and 
interfere with normal social, cognitive, and affective development. 
Thus, child neglect is a serious public health, justice, social 
services, and education problem, not only compromising the immediate 
health of the Nation's children, but also threatening their growth and 
intellectual development, their long-term physical and mental health 
outcomes, their propensity for prosocial behavior, their future

[[Page 71226]]

parenting practices, and their economic productivity.
    The research studies funded by this initiative can focus on a range 
of issues, including, but not limited to, the following: the 
antecedents of neglect; the consequences of neglect; the processes and 
mediators accounting for or influencing the effects of neglect; and 
treatment, preventive intervention, and service delivery.
    This program will be implemented through an interagency agreement 
with the National Institutes of Health. No additional applications will 
be solicited in FY 2000.
Safe Kids/Safe Streets: Community Approaches To Reducing Abuse and 
Neglect and Preventing Delinquency
    This 5\1/2\ year demonstration program is designed to foster 
coordinated community responses to child abuse and neglect. Several 
components of the Office of Justice Programs joined in FY 1996 to 
develop this coordinated program response to break the cycle of early 
childhood victimization and later criminality and to reduce child abuse 
and neglect and resulting child fatalities. OJJDP awarded competitive 
cooperative agreements in FY 1997 to five sites (Chittenden County, VT; 
Huntsville, AL; Kansas City, MO; the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 
Indians, MI; and Toledo, OH). Funds were provided by OJJDP, the 
Executive Office for Weed and Seed, and the Violence Against Women 
Office.
    In FY 2000, continuation awards will be made to each of the current 
demonstration sites. No additional applications will be solicited in FY 
2000.
    The programs described above will further OJJDP's goals and help to 
consolidate and continue the gains made in the past few years in 
combating juvenile delinquency and victimization. OJJDP welcomes 
comments on this Proposed Program Plan.

    Dated: December 13, 1999.
Shay Bilchik,
Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
[FR Doc. 99-32708 Filed 12-17-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P