[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70232-70233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-32534]



[[Page 70232]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP00-40-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Application

December 10, 1999.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1999, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box 1188, Houston, Texas 77251-
1188, filed in Docket No. CP00-40-000 an application pursuant to 
Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Regulations, for a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing FGT to: (1) 
Construct, own and operate certain pipeline facilities on FGT's system; 
(2) acquire an undivided interest in an existing interstate supply 
lateral; (3) roll-in the costs associated with the proposed expansion 
of its facilities; (4) approve certain rate and accounting treatment 
related to the proposed facilities; and (5) approve the submitted pro 
forma tariff sheets, all as more fully set forth in the application 
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/
rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Specifically, FGT proposes to: (1) Acquire an undivided interest in 
Koch Gateway Pipeline Company's (Koch Gateway) Mobile Bay Lateral in 
Mobile County, Alabama that will give FGT capacity of 300,000 Dth per 
day; (2) construct approximately 215 miles of various diameter 
pipeline, additional compression totaling 89,765 horsepower, four 
delivery points, one new supply measurement station, and various other 
miscellaneous facilities (located in George County, Mississippi; Mobile 
and Baldwin Counties, Alabama; and Suwannee, Columbia; Bradford, Clay, 
Putnam, Marion, Citrus, Hernando, Hillsborough, Polk, Lake, Seminole, 
Volusia, Washington, Bay, Gadsden, Orange, Osceola, Santa Rosa, 
Gadsden, Taylor, and Gilchrist Counties, Florida); and (3) rehabilitate 
and re-certificate 15.7 miles of pipeline located in Washington County, 
Florida that was previously abandoned in place. FGT refers to the 
proposed project as the Phase V Expansion and estimates the total cost 
to be $436.8 million, including an estimated $10 million for the 
proposed acquisition of an interest in the Mobile Bay Lateral. Koch 
Gateway filed a concurrent application in Docket No. CP00-39-000 for 
permission and approval to abandon, by sale to FGT, an undivided 
interest in its Mobile Bay Lateral facilities.
    It is indicated in FGT's application that the additional summer 
capacity that will be created by the proposed Phase V Expansion is 
371,015 MMBtu per day. FGT states that it held open seasons for 
transportation service on the Phase V Expansion and for turnback 
capacity. As a result of those open seasons, 2,364 MMBbtu per day of 
capacity (on an annual daily average) was turned back, and FGT executed 
firm transportation service agreements having 20 year terms with eight 
parties for service pursuant to FGT's Rate Schedule FTS-2. The maximum 
daily transportation quantities in the agreements are set forth on a 
seasonal basis and, net of turn-back volumes, amount to 371,015 MMBtu 
per day for the summer months and, over the entire year, amount to an 
annual daily average of 269,695 MMBtu per day.
    FGT requests that the Commission find that the costs of the 
proposed Phase V Expansion can be rolled-in to establish rates for 
service under its incrementally priced Rate Schedule FTS-2. FGT states 
that the maximum rates applicable to Rate Schedule FTS-2 are expected 
to be lower as a result of such rolling-in of costs and thus, will not 
requires subsidies from existing shippers. FGT has agreed to a 
negotiated rate with one shipper, Southern Company Services, Inc. 
(Southern Company), that is below the currently effective maximum 100% 
load factor rate applicable to Rate Schedule FTS-2. FGT has submitted, 
for approval, pro forma tariff sheets reflecting the negotiated rate 
with Southern Company, and changes to the General Terms and Conditions 
of FGT's tariff to permit FGT to track and recover certain power costs 
associated with the installation of two electric drive compressor 
units.
    FGT requests that the Commission issue a preliminary determination 
on non-environmental issues by July 1, 2000, and a final determination 
on all certificate issues on or before January 1, 2001, to enable FGT 
to render service on a proposed in-service date of April 1, 2002. 
However, FGT asks that it be allowed to phase-in gas deliveries to two 
expansion shippers (Florida Power & Light Company, and Southern 
Company) requiring early deliveries, commencing on October 1, 2001, for 
power generating plant preparation and testing. At the time that 
certain Phase V Expansion facilities are placed in-service to provide 
such early deliveries, FGT requests authorization to cease calculating 
AFUDC on those specific facilities and capture and defer, as a 
regulatory asset, depreciation and a calculated amount for pretax 
return, from the time these certain facilities are placed in-service 
until the entire Phase V Expansion is placed in-service.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to Mr. 
Stephen T. Veatch, Director of Certificates and Regulatory Reporting, 
Suite 3997, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002 or call (713) 853-
6549.
    Any person desiring to be heard or making any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before December 30, 1999, 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE, Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission 
will be considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be 
taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. The Commission's rules require that protestors provide 
copies of their protests to the party or person to whom the protests 
are directed. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or 
to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion to 
intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
    A person obtaining intervenor status will be placed on the service 
list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive 
copies of all documents issued by the Commission, filed by the 
applicant, or filed by all other intervenors. An intervenor can file 
for rehearing of any Commission order and can petition for court review 
of any such order. However, an intervenor must serve copies of comments 
or any other filing it makes with the Commission to every other 
intervenor in the proceeding, as well as filing an original and 14 
copies with the Commission.
    A person does not have to intervene, however, in order to have 
comments considered. A person, instead, may submit two copies of such 
comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Commenters will be placed 
on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of 
environmental documents, and will be able to participate in meetings 
associated with the Commission's environmental review process. 
Commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on 
all other parties. However, commenters will not receive copies of all 
documents filed by other parties or issued by the

[[Page 70233]]

Commission, and will not have the right to seek rehearing or appeal the 
Commission's final order to a Federal court.
    The Commission will consider all comments and concerns equally, 
whether filed by commenters or those requesting intervenor status.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the NGA and the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be held 
without further notice before the Commission or its designee on these 
applications if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that a grant of the certificate is required by the public 
convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely 
filed, or if the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal 
hearing is required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for FGT to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 99-32534 Filed 12-15-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M