[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 1999)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 66124-66126] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 99-30700] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 310 ``Do-Not Call ``Provisions of Telemarketing Sales Rule; Meeting AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Announcement of public forum on the ``Do-Not-Call'' provision of the telemarketing sales rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission plans to hold a public [[Page 66125]] forum on January 11, 2000, to discuss issues relating to the ``do-not- call'' provision of the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR Part 310. DATES: The public forum will be held on January 11, 2000, in Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. Notification of interest in participating in the forum must be submitted on or before December 10, 1999. ADDRESSES: Notification of interest in participating in the public forum should be submitted in writing to Carole I. Danielson, Division of Marketing Practices, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 238, Washington, DC 20580. The public forum will be held at the Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 432, Washington, DC 20580. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine C. Harrington-McBride (202) 326-2452 (email [email protected]), Karen Leonard (202) 326-3597, (email [email protected]), or Carole I. Danielson (202) 326-3115 (email [email protected]), Division of Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section A. Background On August 16, 1994, President Clinton signed into law the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (``Telemarketing Act'' or ``the Act''),1 which directed the Commission to prescribe rules prohibiting deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts or practices. In response to this Congressional directive, the Commission promulgated its Telemarketing Sales Rule (``the Rule''), 16 CFR Part 310, which became effective on December 31, 1995.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 6101 et seq. \2\ 60 FR 43842 (August 23, 1995). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Telemarketing Act directed the Commission to include in its rules ``a requirement that telemarketers may not undertake a pattern of unsolicited telephone calls which the reasonable consumer would consider coercive or abusive of such consumer's right to privacy.'' 3 Section 310.4(b) of the Rule sets forth two prohibitions on sellers and telemarketers which were intended to effectuate this requirement of the Act. First, Sec. 310.4(b)(1)(i) prohibits causing any telephone to ring, or engaging any person in telephone conversation, repeatedly or continuously with the intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.4 The second provision in the Rule intended to limit unsolicited telephone calls is the ``do-not-call'' requirement set forth in Sec. 310.4(b)(1)(ii). This section prohibits any telemarketer from initiating, or any seller from causing a telemarketer to initiate, an outbound telephone call to a person when that person previously has stated that he or she does not wish to receive such a call made by or on behalf of the seller whose goods or services are being offered. This provision is modeled on a similar provision included in the FCC's regulations,5 adopted pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (``TCPA'').6 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ 15 U.S.C. 6102(a)(3)(A). \4\ This provision is modeled on a similar provision in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (``FDCPA''). 15 U.S.C. 1692(d)(5). The legislative history of the Telemarketing Act indicated Congress' intent that the Commission consider the FDCPA in establishing prohibited abusive telemarketing acts or practices. See, e.g., H.R. Rep. No. 20, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess. at 8. \5\ 47 CFR 64.1200(a)-(f), 64.1200(e). \6\ 47 U.S.C. 227. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Although both the FTC and the FCC have similar regulations prohibiting sellers or telemarketers from calling persons who have stated that they do not wish to be called, there are differences in the enforcement of the TCPA and the Telemarketing Sales Rule. The Rule may be enforced by the Commission or the States.7 In addition to injunctions, each violation can result in a court's assessment of civil penalties up to $11,000 per violation, or an order to pay redress or disgorgement under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 53(b). By contrast, the TCPA ``do-not-call'' provisions primarily have been enforced by consumers. The TCPA provides a private right of action for a consumer who receives more than one telephone call within any 12- month period by or on behalf of the same entity in violation of the FCC's regulation.8 Such a plaintiff can recover the greater of $500 or actual damages. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 15 U.S.C. 6102(c), 6103. In addition, a person who suffers more than $50,000 in actual damages has a private right of action under the Rule. See 15 U.S.C. 6104. \8\ See 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because of the differences in the agencies' ``do-not-call'' provisions, the Commission declined to make a blanket pronouncement that compliance with the TCPA's ``do-not-call'' procedures would constitute compliance with the Telemarketing Sales Rule.9 Nonetheless, the Commission has clarified that sellers and telemarketers need compile only one list of consumers who wish not to be called in order to comply with the recordkeeping provisions of both the TCPA and the Rule.10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 60 FR at 43855. \10\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- While much of the TSR takes aim against fraudulent telemarketing, an equally important goal of the TSR is to protect consumers' right to privacy. In the five years since the Rule became effective, consumers increasingly have become interested in choosing what information is available about them and with whom and under what circumstances that information may be shared. In response to these concerns, local telephone companies and others have begun to market products that allow consumers to screen out calls from telemarketers, for example, by playing a message stating that no telemarketing calls are accepted or by blocking all calls except those from specific numbers selected by the consumer. Many states have responded to consumer concerns by enacting ``no call'' legislation,11 under which consumers may have their names placed on a list maintained by a centralized list- holder of persons who do not wish to receive telemarketing calls.12 Sellers or telemarketers who call any of the persons on that list would be in violation of state law. Increased consumer awareness of the right to be placed on a ``do-not-call'' list also has resulted in the Commission receiving numerous consumer inquiries on how to stop receiving telemarketing calls and how to assert the right to sue an offending seller or telemarketer under the TCPA.13 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See, e.g.!, Alabama, 1999 Ala. Acts 589; Alaska, 1996 Alaska Sess. Laws 142; Arkansas, 1999 Ark. Acts 1465; Florida, Fla. Stat. Sec. 501.059; Georgia, Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 515-14-1; Kentucky, 1999 Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. Sec. 367.46951 (Michie 1999); Oregon, 1999 Ore. Laws 564; Tennessee,1999 Tenn. Pub. Acts 478. \12\ The idea of a central ``no-call'' list is not new. For many years, Direct Marketing Association (``DMA'') has maintained a no- call database called the ``Telephone Preference Service.'' Consumers may place their names and numbers on a list, which is provided to all DMA members. To remain in good standing with the DMA, its members agree to check the list regularly and remove from their call lists any person who has requested not to be called. \13\ FTC staff refers consumers to the FCC for assistance on how to assert their rights under the TCPA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- During the year 2000, the Commission will be conducting a review of its Telemarketing Sales Rule.14 Simultaneously with this rule review, the Commission intends to conduct a broader study of telemarketing. The planned result is a separate report on the technological, social, business, and [[Page 66126]] other forces that have shaped the practice of telemarketing over the past two decades. The report will also look forward, assessing emerging trends for the future. The Commission will publish a separate Federal Register notice shortly to solicit comments and opinions in connection with both the rule review and the broader report on the telemarketing industry. In addition to requesting written comments and academic studies, the Commission plans to hold a series of public forums to afford staff and interested parties an opportunity to explore relevant issues. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ The Telemarketing Act directs the Commission to conduct a review of the Rule and its impact on fraudulent telemarketing after 5 years following its promulgation, and to report the results to Congress. 15 U.S.C. 6108. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The first forum in this series will address the ``do-not-call'' issue. By devoting an entire forum to this single topic, the Commission staff expects that interested parties will have sufficient time to explore the many facets of this important topic. This forum will be held in advance of the deadline for submitting written comments in the overall rule review so that participants will be able to use the ``do- not-call'' discussion to advance alternative approaches, to gain deeper insight into the forces motivating the various interested parties, and to make their subsequent written comments more focused than they might otherwise be. After analyzing the complete record of the rule review, which will include the information provided at all the forums as well as all written comments and academic studies, the Commission will determine whether to propose amendments to the ``do-not-call'' provision or any of the other Rule provisions. The Commission will also use the information gathered during the review process in its report on telemarketing. Section B. Public Forum The FTC staff will conduct a public forum to discuss the issues raised by the ``do-not-call'' requirement set forth in Sec. 310.4(b)(1)(ii) of the Telemarketing Sales Rule. The purpose of the forum is to facilitate a discussion among members of industry, consumer groups, state regulators, and law enforcement agencies about issues raised by this provision, and possible solutions to any concerns raised in the forum. Section C. Request To Participate The FTC invites members of the public, industry, and other interested parties to participate in the forum. To be eligible to participate, you must file a request to participate by December 10, 1999. If the number of parties who request to participate in the forum is so large that including all requesters would inhibit effective discussion among participants, FTC staff will select as participants a limited number of parties to represent the relevant interests. Selection will be based on the following criteria: 1. The party submitted a request to participate by December 10, 1999. 2. The party's participation would promote the representation of a balance of interests at the forum. 3. The party's participation would promote the consideration and discussion of the issues to be presented in the forum. 4. The party has expertise in issues to be raised in the forum. 5. The party adequately reflects the views of the affected interest(s) which it purports to represent. If it is necessary to limit the number of participants, those who requested to participate but were not selected will be afforded an opportunity, if at all possible, to present statements during a limited time period at the end of the session. The time allotted for these statements will be based on the amount of time necessary for discussion of the issues by the selected parties, and on the number of persons who wish to make statements. Requesters will be notified as soon as possible after December 10, 1999, whether they have been selected to participate. By direction of the Commission. Donald S. Clark, Secretary. [FR Doc. 99-30700 Filed 11-23-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6750-01-P