[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61000-61013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-29173]



[[Page 60999]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV





Department of Housing and Urban Development





_______________________________________________________________________



Notice of Funding Availability for the HUD-Administered Small Cities 
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program--Fiscal Year 2000; 
Notice

  Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 215 / Monday, November 8, 1999 / 
Notices  

[[Page 61000]]



DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4538-N-01]


Notice of Funding Availability for the HUD-Administered Small 
Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program--Fiscal Year 
2000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of funding availability for Fiscal Year 2000.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) announces the 
availability of approximately $ 54,558,000 in Fiscal Year 2000 funding 
for the HUD-administered Small Cities in New York State under the 
Community Development Block Grant Program. The funds announced in this 
NOFA provide small communities and counties in New York State with an 
opportunity to propose programs that focus on creating or expanding job 
opportunities, addressing housing needs, or meeting local public 
facilities needs. HUD encourages communities to propose programs that 
are creative and innovative in addressing the needs of their community. 
A community may propose a program that is ``single purpose'' in nature 
addressing a specific area of need. The maximum amount for a Single 
Purpose grant is $400,000 ($600,000 for counties). In the body of this 
NOFA, is information regarding allocation amounts, eligibility, 
selection criteria and rating factors, and the application submission 
process.
    This NOFA is the first step in a transitional process to transfer 
administration of the Small Cities program to the State of New York, as 
provided for in the FY 2000 Appropriations Act for HUD. According to 
state officials, New York is required under state law to take certain 
actions prior to making funding available to Small Cities participants. 
In addition, there are certain federal law requirements which must be 
fulfilled. In order to ensure an uninterrupted flow of CDBG funds to 
Small Cities while the State executes the steps necessary to run the 
program, the Department will accept applications for funding at this 
time. Applicants should follow the normal application process during 
this transitional period. It is anticipated that the CDBG funding 
process will be entirely assumed by the State upon completion of the 
necessary actions by the State. The Department will work closely with 
the State and with Small Cities participants during this period to 
effect a smooth transition.

APPLICATION DUE DATE: Applications are due no later than March 7, 2000. 
This application deadline is firm as to date and hour. In the interest 
of fairness to all competing applicants, HUD will treat as ineligible 
for consideration any application that is not received by 4 p.m. on, or 
postmarked by, March 7, 2000. Applicants should take this procedure 
into account and make early submission of their materials to avoid any 
risk of loss of eligibility brought about by unanticipated delays or 
other delivery-related problems.

ADDRESSES, APPLICATION SUBMISSION PROCEDURES, AND APPLICATION KITS:
    Addresses for Submitting Applications: Applications must be 
submitted to either HUD's New York or Buffalo Office. (The addresses 
for these offices are provided in Section II. of this NOFA.)
    Mailed Applications. Applications, if mailed, must be postmarked no 
later than midnight on March 7, 2000 and received within 10 calendar 
days of the deadline.
    Hand Carried Applications. If an application is hand-delivered to 
the New York or the Buffalo Office, the application must be delivered 
to the appropriate office by no later than 4 p.m. (local time) on March 
7, 2000.
    Application Kits. Application kits may be obtained from HUD's New 
York or Buffalo Office. (The addresses for these offices are provided 
in Section II. of this NOFA.) In addition, application kits and 
additional information are available on HUD's website located at: 
www.hud.gov or by contacting Community Connections at 1-800-998-9999. 
Application kits will be made available by a date that affords 
applicants no fewer than 45 days to respond to this NOFA. For further 
information on obtaining and submitting applications, please see 
Section II. of this NOFA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvette Aidara, State and Small Cities 
Division, Office of Community Planning and Development, Department of 
Housing and Urban Development, Room 7184, 451 Seventh Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1322 (this is not a toll-free 
number). Hearing or speech-impaired individuals may access this number 
via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 
1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Purpose and Substantive Description
    A. Authority and Background
    1. Authority
    2. Background
    3. Other Program Requirements
    a. Abbreviated Consolidated Plan
    b. Section 3
    4. Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance
    a. HUD Responsibilities
    (1) Documentation and Public Access
    (2) Disclosures
    b. Units of Local Government Responsibilities
    B. Allocation Amounts
    1. Total Available Funding
    2. Imminent Threats
    C. Eligibility
    1. Eligible Applicants
    2. Previous Grantees
    3. Eligible Activities and National Objectives
    4. Anti-pirating provision
    5. Environmental Review Requirements
    D. Grants
    1. General
    2. Grant Limits and Funding Requirements
    3. Applications with Multiple Projects
    E. Selection Criteria/Ranking Factors and Final Selection
    1. General
    2. Performance Evaluation
    a. Community Development Activities
    b. Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations
    c. Performance Assessment Reports
    3. Five Factor Rating
    a. Need--Absolute Number of Persons in Poverty
    b. Need--Percent of Persons in Poverty
    c. Program Impact
    (1) Program Impact--Housing
    (a) Housing Rehabilitation
    (b) Creation of New Housing
    (c) Direct Homeownership Assistance
    (2) Program Impact--Public Facilities Affecting Public Health 
and Safety
    (3) Program Impact--Economic Development Projects
    (a) Scoring
    (b) The Appropriate Determination
    (c) CDBG Assistance Must Minimize Business and Job Displacement
    (d) Section 105(a)(17) Requirements
    (e) National Objectives
    (f) Application Requirements
    d. Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Evaluation
    (1) Housing Achievements
    (a) Provision of Fair Housing Choice
    (b) Implementation of a Fair Housing Strategy that Affirmatively 
Furthers Fair Housing
    (2) Entrepreneurial Efforts and Local Equal Opportunity 
Performance
    (3) Equal Opportunity Employment
    e. Welfare to Work Initiative
    4. Final Selection
II. Application and Funding Award Process
    A. Obtaining Applications
    B. Submitting Applications
    C. The Application
    1. Application Requirements
    2. Streamlined Application Requirements for Certain Applicants
    D. Funding Award Process
III. Technical Assistance
IV. Checklist of Application Submission Requirements

[[Page 61001]]

V. Corrections to Deficient Applications
VI. Findings and Certifications

I. Purpose and Substantive Description

A. Authority and Background

1. Authority
    Title I, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
5301-5320) (the ``1974 HCD Act''); 24 CFR part 570, subpart F, for the 
New York State Small Cities program.
2. Background
    Title I of the 1974 HCD Act authorizes the Community Development 
Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Section 106(d) of Title I permits States, 
in such manner and at such time as the Secretary of HUD shall 
prescribe, to elect to assume the administrative responsibility for the 
CDBG Program for nonentitled areas within their jurisdiction. Section 
106 provides that HUD will administer the CDBG Program for nonentitled 
areas within any State that does not elect to assume the administrative 
responsibility for the program. HUD's regulations at 24 CFR part 570, 
subpart F describe the requirements for HUD's administration of the 
CDBG Program in nonentitled areas (the ``Small Cities Program''). This 
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) supplements subpart F of 24 CFR 
part 570.
    In accordance with 24 CFR 570.421(b), and with the requirements of 
section 102 of the Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (42 
U.S.C. (the ``HUD Reform Act''), HUD is issuing this NOFA for New York 
State's Small Cities Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2000. This NOFA 
announces the allocation of funds for a Single Purpose grant 
competition, and establishes the deadline for filing grant 
applications. The NOFA explains how HUD will apply the regulatory 
threshold requirements for funding eligibility, and the selection 
criteria for rating and scoring applications for Single Purpose grants. 
Communities are encouraged to apply for projects which support the 
Canal Corridor Initiative, an economic development effort funded 
through the Small Cities program.
    Other information about the Small Cities Program will be provided 
in the application kit, which will be made available to applicants by 
HUD's New York Office and Buffalo Office (see Section II. of this 
NOFA). In addition, application kits and additional information are 
available on HUD's website located at: www.hud.gov or by contacting 
Community Connections at 1-800-998-9999.
3. Other Program Requirements
    a. Abbreviated Consolidated Plan. Each jurisdiction that applies 
for funds under this NOFA must have submitted a consolidated plan, as 
provided in 24 CFR part 91. An applicant for more than one grant under 
this NOFA need submit only one consolidated plan or abbreviated 
consolidated plan, as applicable, covering the activities proposed in 
all applications. A jurisdiction that does not expect to be a 
participating jurisdiction in the HOME program under 24 CFR part 92 may 
submit an abbreviated consolidated plan that is appropriate to the 
types and amounts of assistance sought from HUD (see 24 CFR 91.235). 
Any applicant that plans to undertake a housing activity with funds 
under this NOFA needs to prepare and submit, at a minimum, an 
abbreviated consolidated plan that is appropriate to the types and 
amounts of housing assistance sought under this NOFA.
    Even if the community's Small Cities application is approved, HUD 
must also approve an abbreviated consolidated plan that covers 
activities proposed in such application(s) before the community may 
receive Small Cities funding. Further, that applicant must also include 
a certification that the housing activities in its CDBG Small Cities 
application are consistent with the consolidated plan. The applicant's 
consolidated plan must describe the jurisdiction's priority nonhousing 
community development needs eligible for assistance under the CDBG 
program by eligibility category, reflecting the needs of families for 
each type of activity, as appropriate, in terms of dollar amounts 
estimated to meet the priority need for the type of activity (see 24 
CFR 91.235(c)(2)).
    The abbreviated consolidated plan is subject to the same citizen 
participation requirements as is the jurisdiction's Small Cities CDBG 
application. Both must meet the citizen participation requirements 
before they may be submitted to HUD (see 24 CFR 570.431).
    If possible, an applicant should submit the abbreviated 
consolidated plan in advance of the Small Cities application due date. 
The latest time at which the abbreviated consolidated plan will be 
accepted by HUD for the HUD-administered Small Cities Program in New 
York will be March 7, 2000 (the application due date for the Small 
Cities application). Failure to submit the abbreviated consolidated 
plan by the due date is not a curable technical deficiency. Questions 
regarding the abbreviated consolidated plan should be directed to the 
appropriate HUD field office.
    Any application that is fundable but does not have an approved 
consolidated plan will receive a conditional approval subject to HUD's 
approval of the abbreviated consolidated plan. If HUD is unable to 
approve the abbreviated consolidated plan within a reasonable period of 
time (but not more than 60 days from the date that the conditional 
approval is announced), HUD will rescind the award. In such event the 
funding will be awarded to the highest rated fundable applicant that 
did not receive funding under this competition.
    b. Section 3. Assistance provided under this NOFA is subject to the 
requirements of section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u), and HUD's implementing regulations in 24 CFR 
part 135. One of the purposes of this NOFA, which is consistent with 
section 3, is to give, to the greatest extent feasible and consistent 
with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, job training, 
employment and other contracting opportunities generated from certain 
HUD financial assistance to low-and very low-income persons. Public 
entities awarded funds under this NOFA that intend to use the funds for 
housing rehabilitation, housing construction, or other public 
construction must comply with the applicable requirements set forth in 
24 CFR part 135.
4. Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance: Documentation and 
Public Access Requirements; Applicant/Recipient Disclosures
    Section 102 of the HUD Reform Act and the regulations codified in 
24 CFR part 4, subpart A, contain a number of provisions that are 
designed to ensure greater accountability and integrity in the 
provision of certain types of assistance administered by HUD. On 
January 14, 1992 (57 FR 1942), HUD published a notice that also 
provides information on the implementation of section 102. The 
documentation, public access, and disclosure requirements of section 
102 are applicable to assistance awarded under this NOFA as follows:
    a. HUD Responsibilities. (1) Documentation and Public Access. HUD 
will ensure that documentation and other information regarding each 
application submitted pursuant to this NOFA are sufficient to indicate 
the basis upon which assistance was provided or denied. This material, 
including any letters of support, will be made available for public 
inspection for a 5-year period beginning not less than 30 days after 
the award of the assistance.

[[Page 61002]]

Material will be made available in accordance with the Freedom of 
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and HUD's implementing regulations at 24 
CFR part 15. In addition, HUD will include the recipients of assistance 
pursuant to this NOFA in its Federal Register notice of all recipients 
of HUD assistance awarded on a competitive basis.
    (2) Disclosures. HUD will make available to the public for 5 years 
all applicant disclosure reports (HUD Form 2880) submitted in 
connection with this NOFA. Update reports (also Form 2880) will be made 
available along with the applicant disclosure reports, but in no case 
for a period less than 3 years. All reports--both applicant disclosures 
and updates--will be made available in accordance with the Freedom of 
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and HUD's implementing regulations at 24 
CFR part 15.
    b. Units of General Local Government Responsibilities. Units of 
general local government awarded assistance under this NOFA must ensure 
that documentation and other information regarding each application 
submitted to the recipient by a subsequent recipient applicant are 
adequate to indicate the basis upon which assistance was provided or 
denied. The unit of general local government must make this material, 
including any letters of support, available for public inspection for a 
5-year period beginning not less than 30 days after the award of the 
assistance. Unit of general local government recipients must also 
notify the public of the subsequent recipients of the assistance. Each 
recipient will develop documentation, public access, and notification 
procedures for its programs.

B. Allocation Amounts

1. Total Available Funding
    The nonentitlement CDBG funds for New York State for FY 2000 total 
approximately $54,558,000. The exact amount of funds available for this 
Small Cities CDBG funding competition is not known at this time.
    In FY 1997 HUD carried out the Canal Corridor Initiative (see the 
NOFA for this initiative published in the Federal Register on December 
3, 1996 (61 FR 64196) and subsequently amended on December 18, 1996 (61 
FR 66692)). In FY 1999 HUD carried out a second canal Corridor 
Initiative (see the NOFA for this initiative published in the Federal 
Register on November 25, 1998 (63 FR 65456)). Pursuant to those NOFAs, 
HUD approved Canal Corridor applications for approximately $6.5 million 
and $1 million in FY 1997 and FY 1999 New York Small Cities funds, 
respectively.
    HUD must also be prepared, pursuant to 24 CFR 570.432, to use CDBG 
funds each year, as necessary, for the sole purpose of paying any 
amounts due on debt obligations, for up to 20 years, issued by units of 
general local government (or their designated public agencies) and 
guaranteed by the Secretary pursuant to section 108 of the 1974 HCD 
Act, as amended, for projects approved under the Canal Corridor 
Initiative NOFA. HUD approved approximately $6.55 million in FY 1997 
Small Cities funds for Canal Corridor grants. However, at this time, 
the exact amount of CDBG funds that will be needed to meet required 
debt obligation payments during FY 1999 is not known.
    Of the approximately $54,558,000 available under this NOFA, 
approximately $47,024,000 (87.8%) is allocated for distribution to 
eligible units of general local government within the jurisdiction of 
HUD's New York Buffalo Field Office. Approximately $6,534,000 (12.2%) 
is allocated for distribution to eligible units of general local 
government within the jurisdiction of HUD's New York Office.
    Once HUD has determined the final amount of funds available for 
competitive distribution under this NOFA, HUD will allocate such funds 
in the same ratio as above to HUD's Buffalo and New York Offices. 
However, HUD has the option to revise these final allocations between 
offices by up to $400,000 in order to assure full distribution of 
funds. Finally, HUD reserves the right, in its sole discretion, not to 
award all of the funds available under this NOFA and to make any such 
funds available in a future NOFA, if an insufficient number of 
applications are determined fundable under this NOFA.
2. Imminent Threats
    All imminent threat projects must meet the national objective of 
benefitting low-and moderate-income persons. HUD may elect to set aside 
up to 15 percent of the FY 2000 allocations for imminent threat 
projects. These funds will be available until the rating and ranking 
process for funds distributed under this NOFA is completed.

C. Eligibility

1. Eligible Applicants
    Eligible applicants are units of general local government in New 
York State, excluding:
    a. Metropolitan cities;
    b. Urban counties;
    c. Units of government which are participating in urban counties or 
metropolitan cities even if only part of the participating unit of 
government is located in the urban county or metropolitan city; and
    d. Indian tribes (as defined in section 102(a)(17) of the 1974 HCD 
Act).
    Applications may be submitted individually, or jointly, as 
described in 24 CFR 570.422.
2. Previous Grantees
    Eligible applicants that previously have been awarded Small Cities 
Program CDBG grants are also subject to an evaluation of capacity and 
performance (see generally, section I.E.2. of this NOFA). Numerical 
thresholds for drawdown of funds have been established to assist HUD in 
evaluating a grantee's progress in implementing its program activities. 
(These standards apply to all CDBG Program grants received by the 
community.)
    In FY 1996 an additional threshold was established which relates to 
the submission of annual Performance Assessment Reports (PARs). A PAR 
was due on October 31, 1999, for each grant which a local government 
received prior to April 1, 1998. Failure to submit a PAR is not a 
curable technical deficiency under this NOFA.
    Applicants generally will be determined to have performed 
adequately in the area(s) where the thresholds are met. Where a 
threshold has not been met, HUD will evaluate the documentation of any 
mitigating factors, particularly with respect to actions taken by the 
applicant to accelerate the implementation of its program activities.
3. Eligible Activities and National Objectives
    Eligible activities under the Small Cities CDBG Program are those 
identified in subpart C of 24 CFR part 570. Each activity must meet one 
of the national objectives (i.e., benefit to low-and moderate-income 
persons, elimination of slums or blighting conditions, or meeting 
imminent threats to the health and safety of the community; see 
Sec. 570.208), and each grant must meet the requirements for compliance 
with the primary objective of principally benefiting low- and moderate-
income persons, as required under Sec. 570.420(e).
    The CDBG program requires that not less than 70 percent of the 
total of grant funds from a grant made under this NOFA and any Section 
108 Loan Guarantee funds received within a fiscal year must be expended 
for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons under the 
criteria of 24 CFR

[[Page 61003]]

570.208(a). The method of calculating the use of these funds for 
compliance with the 70 percent overall benefit requirement is set forth 
in Sec. 570.420(e). In general, all applications must describe the 
projects and activities proposed in sufficient detail that compliance 
with these and other applicable statutory, regulatory, and NOFA 
provisions can be determined.
4. Anti-Pirating Prohibition
    Section 588 of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 
1998 (Pub. L. 105-276, approved October 21, 1998) amended section 
105(h) of the 1974 HCD Act as follows:

    (h) prohibition on use of assistance for employment relocation 
activities. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amount 
from a grant under section 106 made in fiscal year 1999 or any 
succeeding fiscal year may be used to assist directly in the 
relocation of any industrial or commercial plant, facility, or 
operation, from 1 area to another area, if the relocation is likely 
to result in a significant loss of employment in the labor market 
area from which the relocation occurs.

    Accordingly, HUD will not award any grant for any project that 
would violate this prohibition.
5. Environmental Review Requirement
    The HUD environmental review procedures contained in 24 CFR part 58 
apply to this program. Under part 58, grantees assume all of the 
responsibilities for environmental review, decisionmaking and action 
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.) and the other provisions of law specified by the 
Secretary in 24 CFR part 58 that would apply to the Secretary were he 
to undertake such projects as Federal projects.

D. Grants

1. General
    HUD will fund only Single Purpose grants which are designed to 
address and resolve a specific community development need. A Single 
Purpose grant may consist of more than one project. A project may 
consist of one activity or a set of activities. Each project must 
address community development needs in one of the following problem 
areas:
    a. Housing;
    b. Public Facilities; or
    c. Economic Development.
    Each project will be rated against all other projects addressing 
the same problem area, according to the criteria outlined below. It 
should be noted that each project within an application will be given a 
separate impact rating, if each one is clearly designated by the 
applicant as a separate and distinct project (i.e., separate Needs 
Description, Community Development Activities, Impact Description and 
Program Schedule forms have been filled out, indicating project names).
    In some cases, it may be to the applicant's advantage to designate 
separate projects for activities that can ``stand on their own'' in 
terms of meeting the described need, especially where a particular 
project would tend to weaken the impact rating of the other activities, 
if they were rated as a whole, as has been the case with some economic 
development and housing projects. If, however, the projects tend to 
meet impact criteria to the same extent, or the weaker element is only 
a small portion of the overall project, there is no discernable benefit 
in designating separate projects.
2. Grant Limits and Funding Requirements
    The maximum annual grant for a Single Purpose grant is $400,000, 
except that counties may apply for up to $600,000 in Single Purpose 
funds, if the project will be carried out in more than one community. 
If other sources of funds are to be used with respect to a project, the 
source of those funds must be identified and the level of commitment 
indicated.
    With respect to grant limits for joint applicants, the maximum 
amount that may be awarded pursuant to a joint application is the 
maximum single grant limit established above for communities and 
counties multiplied by the number of participants in the cooperation 
agreement, provided that for purposes of determining such a multiple 
grant limit, and in order to receive that amount, a participating joint 
applicant must receive a substantial direct benefit from the activities 
proposed in the application and must not be acting solely on behalf of 
or in conjunction with another jurisdiction for the sole purpose of 
raising the maximum grant amount that may be awarded. In addition, the 
statistics of each participant counted for maximum grant limits 
purposes shall also be used for purposes of the selection factors under 
section I.E.3. of this NOFA.
3. Applications With Multiple Projects
    If an application contains more than one project, each project will 
be rated separately for program impact. Applicants should note that 
regardless of the number of projects, the total grant amount cannot 
exceed the limits identified in section I.D.2. of this NOFA.

E. Selection Criteria/Ranking Factors and Final Selection

1. General
    Complete applications received from eligible applicants by March 7, 
2000 will be rated and scored by HUD. Applications are rated and scored 
against five factors. These five factors are discussed in more detail 
in section I.E.3. of this NOFA.
    Applicants should note that when an applicant proposes to use 
Section 108 Loan Guarantee assistance as a partial funding resource for 
a proposed project under this NOFA, HUD, when applying the rating 
factors to such projects, will consider the applicant's description of 
the Section 108 assisted project in arriving at the score for a 
particular factor. An applicant may have an approved 108 Loan Guarantee 
application, submit a full Section 108 Loan Guarantee application or 
provide a description of the Section 108 Loan Guarantee application. 
(The description must be specific as to the amount of the Section 108 
Loan Guarantee commitment that the applicant will request and the 
purpose for which the 108 Loan Guarantee proceeds will be used.)
    However, any such CDBG application under this NOFA that is fundable 
and relies upon Section 108 Loan Guarantee assistance to partially 
carry out the activities and does not have an approved Section 108 Loan 
Guarantee commitment will receive a conditional approval. If the 
applicant does not submit and HUD does not approve the required Section 
108 Loan Guarantee application within a reasonable period of time (see 
section II.C.1.(f)(2) of this NOFA), HUD may rescind the award. In such 
event the funding will be awarded to the highest rated fundable 
applicant that did not receive funding under this competition.
2. Performance Evaluation
    As noted in section I.C. of this NOFA, previous recipients of Small 
Cities Program CDBG grants are subject to an evaluation of performance 
and continuing capacity to undertake the proposed program. For purposes 
of making performance evaluations, HUD will use any information that 
becomes available before grant awards are announced. Performance also 
will be evaluated using information which may be available already to 
HUD, including previously submitted performance reports, site visit 
reports, audits, monitoring reports and annual community assessments. 
The HUD office may request and consider additional information in cases 
where it

[[Page 61004]]

is essential to make the required performance judgments (see 24 CFR 
570.423(d), captioned ``Thresholds'').
    No grants will be made to an applicant that does not have the 
capacity to undertake the proposed program. A performance determination 
will be made by an evaluation of the following areas:
    a. Community Development Activities. The following thresholds for 
performance in expending CDBG funds have been established for FY 2000 
and pertain to all Single Purpose Grants, including grants pursuant to 
approved multiyear plans:
    (1) FY 1994 and earlier--Grants must be closed out.
    (2) FY 1995--Grant funds 100 percent expended.
    (3) FY 1996--Grant funds 75 percent expended.
    (4) FY 1997--Grant funds 30 percent expended.
    (5) FY 1998 and FY 1999--Recipients must be on target with respect 
to the latest Small Cities Program Schedule received by HUD.

    Note: These standards will be used as benchmarks in judging 
program performance, but will not be the sole basis for determining 
whether the applicant is ineligible for a grant due to a lack of 
capacity to carry out the proposed project or program. Any applicant 
that fails to meet the percentages specified above may wish to 
provide updated data to HUD, either in conjunction with the 
application submission or under separate cover, but in no case will 
data received by HUD after March 7, 2000 be accepted, unless 
specifically requested by HUD.

    b. Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations. An applicant 
will be considered to have performed inadequately if the applicant:
    (1) Has not substantially complied with the laws, regulations, and 
Executive Orders applicable to the CDBG Program, including applicable 
civil rights laws as may be evidenced by:
    (a) An outstanding finding of civil rights noncompliance, unless 
the applicant demonstrates that it is operating in compliance with a 
HUD-approved compliance agreement designed to correct the area(s) of 
noncompliance;
    (b) An adjudication of a civil rights violation in a civil action 
brought against it by a private individual, unless the applicant 
demonstrates that it is operating in compliance with a court order 
designed to correct the area(s) of noncompliance;
    (c) A deferral of Federal funding based upon civil rights 
violations;
    (d) A pending civil rights suit brought against it by the 
Department of Justice; or
    (e) An unresolved charge of discrimination issued against it by the 
Secretary under section 810(g) of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented 
by 24 CFR 103.400;
    (2) Has not resolved or attempted to resolve findings made as a 
result of HUD monitoring; or
    (3) Has not resolved or attempted to resolve audit findings.
    An applicant will be ineligible for a grant where the inadequate 
performance in compliance with applicable laws and regulations 
evidences a lack of capacity to carry out the proposed project or 
program. For example, an application will not be accepted from a unit 
of general local government which has an outstanding audit finding or 
monetary obligation for any HUD program. Additionally, applications 
will not be accepted from any entity which proposes an activity in a 
unit of general local government that has an outstanding audit finding 
or monetary obligation for any HUD program.
    The Director of the Community Planning and Development Division of 
the HUD field office may provide an exception to this prohibition if 
the unit of general local government has made a good faith effort to 
clear the audit finding. No exception will be provided if funds are due 
HUD, unless a satisfactory arrangement for repayment of the debt has 
been made.
    c. Performance Assessment Reports. Under 24 CFR 570.507, Small 
Cities CDBG grantees are required to submit Performance Assessment 
Reports (PARs) on October 31st, for the period ended September 30th, 
for all open grants awarded before April 1st of the same year. For an 
application for FY 2000 funds to be considered for funding, the 
applicant must be current in its submission of PARs. Failure to submit 
a PAR is not a curable technical deficiency under section V. of this 
NOFA.
3. Five Factor Rating
    As noted in section I.E.1. of this NOFA, all applications are rated 
and scored against five factors. These five factors are:
     Need based on absolute number of persons in poverty;
     Need based on the percent of persons in poverty;
     Program Impact;
     Outstanding performance in fair housing and equal 
opportunity; and
     Welfare to Work Initiative
    A maximum of 605 points is possible under this system with the 
maximum points for each factor being:
     Need--absolute number of persons in poverty (up to 75 
points)
     Need--percent of persons in poverty (up to 75 points)
     Program Impact (up to 400 points)
     Outstanding performance--FHEO
     a. Provision of fair housing choice (up to 20 points)
     b. New Horizons Fair Housing Assistance Project (up to 20 
points)
     c. Equal opportunity employment (up to 10 points)
     Welfare to Work Initiative (up to 5 points)
    Total: 605 points
    Each of the five factors is outlined below. All awarded points for 
each factor will be rounded to the nearest whole number.
    a. Need--Absolute number of persons in poverty (Up to 75 points). 
HUD uses 1990 census data to determine the absolute number of persons 
in poverty residing within the applicant unit of general local 
government. Applicants which are county governments are rated 
separately from all other applicants. For applications from joint 
applicants, data from each participating unit of general local 
government (as described in 24 CFR 570.422) will be aggregated. 
Applicants in each group are compared in terms of the number of persons 
whose incomes are below the poverty level. Individual scores are 
obtained by dividing each applicant's absolute number of persons in 
poverty by the greatest number of persons in poverty of any applicant 
and multiplying by 75.
    b. Need--Percent of persons in poverty (up to 75 points). HUD uses 
1990 census data to determine the percent of persons in poverty 
residing within the applicant unit of general local government. 
Applicants in each group are compared in terms of the percentage of 
their population below the poverty level. For applications from joint 
applicants, data from each participating unit of general local 
government will be aggregated. Individual scores are obtained by 
dividing each applicant's percentage of persons in poverty by the 
highest percentage of persons in poverty of any applicant and 
multiplying by 75.
    c. Program Impact (up to 400 points). In evaluating program impact, 
HUD will consider various factors. Within each activity type described 
below is a set of factors and scoring weights that will be used. Each 
proposal will be rated using the factors and scoring weights described 
in the selection criteria below.
    Assessments are done on a comparative basis and, as a result, it is 
important that each applicant present information in a detailed and 
uniform manner.
    For projects consisting of more than one activity, the activity 
that directly

[[Page 61005]]

addresses the need must represent at least the majority of funds 
requested. Other activities must be incidental to and in support of the 
principal activity. For example, public improvements included in a 
rehabilitation project that addresses housing need must: (1) be a 
relatively small amount in terms of funds requested; (2) clearly be in 
support of the housing objective; and (3) demonstrate a positive and 
direct link to the national objective. For incidental activities 
claiming benefit to low- and moderate-income persons on an area basis, 
the application must document that at least 51 percent of the residents 
of the service area meet the low- and moderate-income requirement. 
Funds should not be requested for activities that are not incidental to 
and in support of the principal activity.
    In addressing program impact criteria, applicants should adhere to 
the following general guidelines for quantification. Where appropriate, 
absolute and percentage figures should be used to describe the extent 
of community development needs and the impact of the proposed program. 
This includes, but is not limited to, appropriate units of measure 
(e.g., number of housing units or structures, linear feet of pipe, 
pounds per square inch, etc.), and costs per unit of measure. These 
quantification guidelines apply to the description of need, the nature 
of proposed activities and the extent to which the proposed program 
will address the identified need.
    Appropriate documentation should be provided to support the degree 
of need described in the application. Basically, the sources for all 
statements and conclusions relating to community needs should be 
included in the application or incorporated by reference. Examples of 
appropriate documentation include planning studies, letters from public 
agencies, newspaper articles, photographs and survey data.
    Generally, the most effective documentation is that which 
specifically addresses the subject matter and has a high degree of 
credibility. Applicants which intend to conduct surveys to obtain data 
are advised to contact the appropriate HUD office prior to conducting 
the survey for a determination as to whether the survey methodology is 
statistically acceptable.
    There are a number of program design factors related to feasibility 
which can alter significantly the award of impact points. Accordingly, 
it is imperative that applicants provide adequate documentation in 
addressing these factors. Common feasibility issues include site 
control, availability of other funding sources, validity of cost 
estimates, and status of financial commitments as well as evidence of 
the status of regulatory agency review and approval.
    Past productivity and administrative performance of prior grantees 
will be taken into consideration when reviewing the overall feasibility 
of the program. Overall program design, administration and guidelines 
are other feasibility issues that should be articulated and presented 
in the application, since they are critical in assessing the 
effectiveness and impact of the proposed program.
    Each project will be rated against other projects addressing the 
same problem area, so that, for example, housing projects only will be 
compared with other housing projects, according to the criteria 
outlined below. It should be noted that each project within an 
application will be given a separate impact rating, if each one is 
clearly designated by the applicant as a separate and distinct project 
(i.e., separate Needs Descriptions, Community Development Activities, 
and Impact Description and Program Schedule forms have been filled out, 
indicating separate project names).
    In some cases, it may be to the applicant's advantage to designate 
separate projects for activities that can ``stand on their own'' in 
terms of meeting the described need, especially where a particular 
project would tend to weaken the impact rating of the other activities, 
if they were all related as a whole, as has been the case with some 
economic development projects. If, however, the projects tend to meet 
the impact criteria to the same extent, or the weaker element is only a 
small portion of the overall program, there is no discernible benefit 
in designating separate projects.
    Applicants should bear in mind that the impact of the proposed 
project will be judged by persons who may not be familiar with the 
particular community. Accordingly, individual projects will be rated 
according to how well the application demonstrates in specific, 
measurable terms, the extent to which the impact criteria are met. 
General statements of need and impact alone will not be sufficient to 
obtain a favorable rating. HUD will not make a Small Cities grant when 
it determines that the grant will only have a minimal or insignificant 
impact on the grantee. For the purposes of this NOFA, any application 
not scoring above 100 points of the possible 400 points for the Program 
Impact factor will be deemed to have a minimal or insignificant impact 
on the grantee and will not be funded regardless of the number of 
points the applicant may otherwise receive or the ranking it attains as 
a result of its score due to points received on other rating factors.
    (1) Program Impact--Housing. There are three distinct types of 
Housing projects: Housing Rehabilitation, Creation of New Housing and 
Direct Homeownership Assistance. Separate rating criteria are provided 
for each type of project.
    (a) Housing Rehabilitation. The following factors and weights will 
be used to evaluate proposed housing rehabilitation projects:
    (i) Severity of Need (proportion of units that are substandard and 
extent of disrepair) (up to 160 points of the total Program Impact 
score). Each application should provide information on the total number 
of units in the project area, the number that are substandard, and the 
number of substandard units occupied by low- and moderate-income 
households. The purpose of this information is to establish the 
relative severity of housing conditions within the designated project 
area compared to other housing rehabilitation applications.
    The application also should describe the date and methodology of 
any surveys used to obtain the information, including any explicit and 
detailed definition of ``substandard.'' Surveys of housing conditions 
serve several purposes in evaluating applications for housing 
rehabilitation activities. These include establishing the seriousness 
of need for such assistance in the project area, providing a basis for 
estimating overall budgetary needs, and providing an indication of the 
marketability of the project.
    (ii) Extent to which proposed program will resolve the identified 
problem (up to 50 points of the total Program Impact score). Applicants 
should note that programs that propose minimal rehabilitation may not 
necessarily be addressing the identified problem.
    (iii) Feasibility (marketability, project design affecting timely 
completion of the project) (up to 50 points of the total Program Impact 
score). The application should describe the project in sufficient 
detail to allow the reviewer to assess its feasibility and its probable 
impact on the conditions described. It also should describe project 
requirements in such a way that regulatory and policy concerns will be 
addressed.
    HUD encourages communities to support the Healthy Homes Secretarial 
initiative. Applicants applying for Small Cities CDBG funds to 
rehabilitate housing and/or construct new housing

[[Page 61006]]

units may support these initiatives by including Healthy Homes features 
in their program design, such as window locks, deadbolt locks on doors, 
locks or safety latches on medicine cabinets, smoke detectors, carbon 
monoxide detectors, energy efficient windows, elimination of lead-based 
paint, and any other activities that contribute to Healthy Homes, 
especially regarding children.
    (iv) Leveraging of other resources (up to 60 points of the total 
Program Impact score). HUD encourages communities to design projects 
supplementing Small Cities rehabilitation funds with private funds 
wherever feasible and appropriate, especially in the case of rental 
units and housing not occupied by lower-income persons. In such cases, 
the Small Cities grant subsidy should be as low as possible, while 
retaining sufficient incentive to attract local participants. On the 
other hand, projects designed for low-income homeowners should not 
require private contributions at a level that puts the project out of 
reach of potential participants.
    (v) Cost per unit (up to 80 points of the Program Impact score). 
HUD will review the applicant's documentation to determine whether the 
applicant's cost-per-unit is lower than other applicants' costs-per-
unit. All applications should provide documentation to justify the 
cost-per-unit estimates, particularly grantees where past performance 
does not support the estimates in the applications. In reviewing 
applications from grantees with prior housing rehabilitation projects, 
reasonableness of cost-per-unit, stated in the application, will be 
compared against the grantee's actual past performance.
    (b) Creation of New Housing. CDBG funds may be used to support the 
construction of new housing units, the creation of new units proposed 
through conversion of existing structures (currently vacant structures 
or conversion of nonresidential structures for residential use) and, in 
certain circumstances, to finance the actual cost of constructing new 
units. New construction may be carried out by an eligible nonprofit 
entity pursuant to 24 CFR 570.204, or as last resort housing. Note that 
for purposes of specific uses of Section 108 Loan Guarantee proceeds, 
eligibility is limited to assistance for community economic development 
projects under Sec. 570.204(a)(2).
    See also 24 CFR 570.703(i)(2). Support of new construction could 
include nonconstruction assistance such as the acquisition and/or 
clearance of land, the provision of infrastructure, or the payment of 
certain planning costs.
    The following factors and weights will be used to evaluate proposed 
projects for the creation of new housing:
    (i) Severity of need for new housing affordable to low- and 
moderate-income persons shown in the project area (up to 160 points of 
the total Program Impact score). Where the creation of new units is 
proposed, the application should document the need for additional units 
based on vacancy rates, waiting lists, and other pertinent information.
    (ii) Extent to which the proposed program will create new housing 
units affordable to low- and moderate-income persons (up to 50 points 
of the total Program Impact score). The proposed project clearly must 
support, or result in, additional units for low- and moderate-income 
persons. The units may result from new construction projects for which 
the proposed project will provide nonconstruction assistance.
    (iii) Feasibility (marketability, project design affecting timely 
completion of the project) (up to 50 points of the total Program Impact 
score). Applicants should address issues of site control and 
marketability, in addition to addressing feasibility from the 
standpoint of market financing.
    (iv) Leveraging of other resources (up to 60 points of the total 
Program Impact score). Where the proposed project involves the use of 
Federally assisted housing, the applicant must identify and document 
the current commitment status of the Federal assistance. Lack of a firm 
financial commitment for assistance may adversely affect project 
impact.
    (v) Cost per unit (up to 60 points of the total Program Impact 
score). HUD will review the applicant's documentation to determine 
whether the applicant's cost-per-unit is lower than other applicants' 
costs-per-unit. All applications should provide documentation to 
justify the cost-per-unit estimates, particularly grantees where past 
performance does not support the estimates in the applications. In 
reviewing applications from grantees with prior housing projects, 
reasonableness of cost-per-unit, stated in the application, will be 
compared against the grantee's actual past performance.
    (vi) Extent to which the project would affirmatively further fair 
housing (either through spatial deconcentration of minorities 
throughout the community or through spatial deconcentration of low-and 
moderate-income households if there are no areas of minority 
concentration) (up to 20 points of the total Program Impact score).
    (c) Direct Homeownership Assistance. Homeownership activities are 
defined as activities which would promote homeownership within the 
applicant jurisdiction, focusing particularly on aiding low- and 
moderate-income persons in becoming homeowners. This may include 
activities authorized under 24 CFR 570.201(n) for purposes of use of 
Small Cities grant funding. However, activities eligible solely under 
24 CFR 570.201(n) are not permitted uses of Section 108 loan guarantee 
proceeds. While declining to identify any particular type of proposed 
project as superior, HUD is identifying several criteria which must be 
addressed within the project design, in order for the application to 
receive the maximum project impact.
    Applications must include a well developed description of 
homeownership needs in the applicant jurisdiction, focusing 
particularly on the needs of low-and moderate-income persons. The 
description also should include, if applicable, any alternative 
approaches which have been considered in meeting homeownership needs. 
Project feasibility must be addressed as part of the application.
    The application must demonstrate that the proposed project would 
make effective use of all available funds. This would include any 
local, State or other Federal funds which would be utilized by the 
proposed project. If other such funds are included as part of the 
proposed project, the applicant must demonstrate that such funds are 
committed and truly available for the project. Any efforts which would 
affirmatively further fair housing, by promoting homeownership among 
minorities as well as homeownership throughout the community, must be 
outlined in the application.
    The application must explain how the project would benefit low- and 
moderate-income homebuyers, particularly focusing on first-time and 
minority homebuyers. The application also should address any 
homeownership counseling services, including counseling pertaining to 
Federal, State, and local fair housing laws and requirements, which 
would be provided to persons selected to participate in the proposed 
project. Finally, the application should describe how the project would 
utilize public/private partnerships to promote homeownership, 
particularly in the sense that private sector financing would be 
accessible, as necessary, to project participants to complement 
available public sector funds, including CDBG money.
    The following factors and weights will be used to evaluate proposed 
direct homeownership assistance projects:

[[Page 61007]]

    (i) The extent to which the application demonstrates severity of 
homeownership needs in the community (up to 160 points of the total 
Program Impact score).
    (ii) The extent to which: the project design is appropriate to meet 
demonstrated homeownership needs; the project would make effective use 
of available funds; alternative approaches to meeting the homeownership 
needs have been considered; and the proposed project would target 
first-time homebuyers (up to 60 points of the total Program Impact 
score).
    (iii) The extent to which the project is feasible and likely to be 
implemented in accordance with a project schedule (up to 50 points of 
the total Program Impact score).
    (iv) The extent to which the proposed project would: complement 
other Federal, State or local programs that promote homeownership; and 
utilize public/private partnerships in attempting to promote 
homeownership, particularly in regard to participation by local 
financial institutions considering the cost per unit (up to 80 points 
of the total Program Impact score).
    (v) The extent to which the proposed project would provide 
homeownership counseling to project participants (up to 30 points of 
the total Program Impact score).
    (vi) The extent to which the project would affirmatively further 
fair housing through proposed initiatives to reach out to potential 
minority homeowners and/or to promote homeownership opportunities 
throughout the community (up to 20 points of the total Program Impact 
score).
    (2) Program Impact--Public Facilities Affecting Public Health and 
Safety. In the case of public facility projects, documentation of the 
problem by outside, third-party sources is of primary importance. In 
the case of water and sewer projects, documentation from public 
agencies is particularly helpful, especially where such agencies have 
pinpointed the exact cause of the problem and have recommended courses 
of action which would eliminate the problem. Such supporting 
documentation should be as up-to-date as possible; the older the 
supporting material, the more doubt arises that the need is current and 
immediate. Applicants also should be sure to indicate how the project 
would address public health and safety needs and conditions. 
Quantification also is essential in describing needs. Documentation 
from those affected should be included.
    The following factors and weights will be used to evaluate proposed 
public facilities projects affecting the public health and safety:
    (a) Severity of Need (up to 160 points of the total Program Impact 
score). The applicant should describe, including appropriate 
documentation, as best as possible, the degree to which the need is 
serious, current and requires prompt attention.
    (b) Extent to which the proposed program will resolve the 
identified problem and public health and safety concerns (up to 50 
points of the total Program Impact score). The applicant should 
demonstrate that the project will completely solve the problem and, if 
applicable, the applicant should address whether the proposal would be 
satisfactory to other State/local agencies which have jurisdiction over 
the problem.
    (c) Feasibility (up to 50 points of the total Program Impact 
score). The applicant should address whether the proposal is the most 
cost effective and efficient among the possible alternatives 
considered, and the funding requested will be sufficient to resolve the 
problem. Total project costs should be documented by qualified third-
party estimates, and be as recent as possible.
    (d) Extent of benefit to affected persons and the cost per 
household (up to 80 points of the total Program Impact score).
    (e) Leveraging other resources to minimize project costs (up to 40 
points of the total Program Impact score). To the extent that Small 
Cities grant funds will not cover all costs, the source of other funds 
should be identified and committed. If local funds are to be used, the 
applicant should show both the willingness and the ability to provide 
the funds.
    (f) Extent to which the project addresses deficiencies in 
accessibility for disabled persons and/or provides a significant 
increase in the number of public facilities accessible to disabled 
persons (up to 20 points of the total Program Impact score).
    (3) Program Impact--Economic Development Projects.
    As discussed earlier in this section of the NOFA, each individual 
Single Purpose project will receive a separate impact rating. 
Applicants whose proposed economic development program will include 
multiple proposals should determine the most appropriate form of 
submission. This determination will require a choice as to either the 
incorporation of all proposals into a single project or the submission 
of separate projects for each proposal (each transaction will be 
considered a separate project). The single project format presents an 
``all or nothing'' situation. In determining the appropriate submission 
format, applicants should consider the ability of a transaction to rate 
well on its own, based on the magnitude of employment impact, size of 
the financial transaction and the other factors discussed in this 
section.
    The submission of proposals as separate projects must be clearly 
designated by the applicant with individual Needs Descriptions, 
Community Development Activities, Impact Descriptions and Program 
Schedule forms, including an appropriate name for each project on HUD 
Form 4124.1.
    Section 807(c)(3) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1992 (42 U.S.C. 5305 note) provides that it is the sense of Congress 
that each grantee should devote one percent of its grant for the 
purpose of providing assistance under section 105(a)(23) of the 1974 
HCD Act to facilitate economic development through commercial 
microenterprises. A ``microenterprise'' is defined as a commercial 
enterprise with five or fewer employees, one or more of whom owns the 
enterprise. While not a requirement, this intent should be considered 
in developing an economic development application.
    It is noted that in accordance with section 105 of the 1974 HCD 
Act, HUD published on January 5, 1995 (60 FR 1922), a final rule 
relating to evaluation and selection of Economic Development activities 
by grantees, including evaluation of public benefit (generally codified 
at 24 CFR 570.209). Economic Development applications must be specific 
enough to permit a determination that such threshold public benefit 
standards are met.
    HUD encourages applicants to submit economic development 
applications which build on or are related to Canal Corridor Initiative 
activities.
    (a) Scoring. The following factors and weights will be used to 
evaluate proposed economic development projects:
    (i) The extent to which the project will have a direct and positive 
impact on employment opportunities for persons from low- and moderate-
income households (up to 160 points of the total Program Impact score). 
Applicants are reminded that for an activity to be consistent with the 
statutory objective of low- and moderate-income benefit, as a result of 
the creation or retention of jobs, at least 51 percent of created or 
retained employment opportunities must be held by, or made available 
to, persons from low- and moderate-income families. Applicants must 
fully document and describe employment

[[Page 61008]]

benefits. In addition, applicants should address the following issues:
    a. All employment data must be expressed in terms of full-time 
equivalents (FTEs). Only permanent jobs may be counted, and applicants 
must take into account such factors as seasonal and part-time 
employment. A seasonal job may be considered permanent if the season is 
long enough to be considered the person's principal occupation; 
permanent part-time jobs must be converted to the full-time equivalent.
    b. The amount of CDBG assistance required to produce each full-time 
equivalent job will affect the impact assessment by HUD. Lower CDBG 
costs per job are preferable to higher CDBG costs per job. Such 
assessments of impact will be done on a comparative basis among all 
projects submitted, rather than by comparison to a given standard.
    c. The use of CDBG funds to assist a business with transferring to 
a different community will generally be considered as having no 
employment impact. Exceptions to this rule may include an expansion to 
the business as a result of, or concurrent with, the transfer; or if 
the business can demonstrate that it is infeasible to continue 
operations at the current site. An applicant that fails to document a 
basis for such an exception could receive a substantially lower score 
under this ranking factor. Applicants are encouraged to use CDBG funds 
for projects that provide as many jobs as possible for individuals that 
are currently receiving public assistance. Providing employment to 
recipients of public assistance will help break the cycle of dependency 
and empower low-income citizens to take control of their lives.
    (ii) The extent to which market analysis and other risk data 
provides assurance that the proposed project will be successful (up to 
50 points of the total Program Impact score).
    (iii) The extent to which the proposed project addresses all 
appropriate feasibility issues (including extent of firm private 
financing commitments) and the extent to which there is reasonable 
assurance that the project will be completed in a timely manner (up to 
50 points of the total Program Impact score). Projects that are likely 
to encounter feasibility issues which would hinder the timely 
completion of the project will receive a lower score under this 
criterion. Such issues include, but are not limited to: site control, 
zoning, public approvals and permits, infrastructure, environment, and 
relocation. Applicants should address these and any other applicable 
issues and provide documentation where appropriate.
    Applicants also must demonstrate the reasonable likelihood of the 
project's success, from both a financial and employment standpoint. An 
analysis or market data, which indicates an inordinate risk in the 
undertaking of the project, will affect the overall rating of program 
impact. In order to receive a higher rating, the costs must be 
reasonable (i.e., not inflated).
    (iv) Extent to which the project provides Public Benefits relative 
to other proposals' cost per job (up to 80 points of the total Program 
Impact score).
    (v) The extent to which Small Cities grant funds will leverage the 
investment of private and other dollars and the extent to which Small 
Cities grant funds are NOT used to substitute for private financing (up 
to 60 points of the total Program Impact score). Leverage is defined as 
the amount of private debt and equity to be invested as a direct result 
of the CDBG-funded activity. Projects which provide the maximum 
feasible level of private investment will be considered as having 
appropriate leverage. The extent of firm commitments for private 
financing will be reviewed as well as the amount of equity investment. 
The project will be reviewed to determine whether CDBG funds are 
replacing private sources of funds. In order to receive maximum impact 
CDBG funds may not replace private financing, CDBG assistance must be 
limited to the amount necessary to fund the project without replacing 
CDBG funds for private funds, and equity funds should bear the greatest 
risk in the project.
    In addition to the standard submission requirements, HUD will 
evaluate the following as part of its Eligibility Review prior to 
considering an application for funding in the FY 2000 competition.
    (b) The Appropriate Determination. HUD has developed guidelines for 
review of economic development activities undertaken with CDBG funds. 
These guidelines are composed of two components: guidelines for 
evaluating project costs and financial requirements; and standards for 
evaluating public benefit. The standards for evaluating public benefit 
are mandatory, but the guidelines for evaluating project costs and 
financial requirements are not. The guidelines for evaluating project 
costs are to ensure:
    (i) Reasonableness of Proposed Costs. The applicant must review 
each project cost element and determine that the cost is reasonable and 
consistent with third-party, fair-market prices for that cost element. 
The general principle is that the level of CDBG assistance cannot be 
adequately determined if the project costs are understated or inflated.
    (ii) Commitment of Other Sources of Funds. The applicant shall 
review all projected sources of funds necessary to complete the project 
and shall verify that all sources (in particular private debt and 
equity financing) have been firmly committed to the extent practicable, 
and are available to be invested in the project. Verification means 
ascertaining that: the source of funds is committed; that the terms and 
conditions of the committed funds are known; and the source has the 
capacity to deliver.
    (iii) No Substitution of CDBG Funds (including Section 108 Loan 
Guarantee proceeds) for Private Sources of Funds. The applicant shall 
financially underwrite the project and ensure to the extent possible 
that CDBG funds are not being substituted for available private debt 
financing or equity capital. The analysis must be tailored to the type 
of project being assisted (e.g., real estate, user project, capital 
equipment, working capital, etc.). Real estate projects require 
different financial analysis than working capital or machinery and 
equipment projects. Applicants should ensure that both a significant 
equity commitment by the for-profit business exists and that the level 
of certainty of the end use of the property or project is sufficient to 
ensure the achievement of national objectives within a reasonable 
period of time.
    (iv) Establishment of Small Cities Grant Financing Terms. The 
amount of Small Cities grant assistance provided to a for-profit 
business ideally should be limited to the amount, with appropriate 
repayment terms, sufficient to go forward without substituting Small 
Cities grant funds for available private debt or cash equity. The 
applicant should structure its repayment terms so that the business is 
allowed a reasonable rate of return on invested equity, considering the 
level of risk of the project. Equity funds generally should bear the 
greatest risk of all funds invested in a project.
    (v) Public Benefit Determination. The applicant's activities must 
meet the public benefit standards found in 24 CFR 570.209(b). 
Activities covered by these guidelines (subject to certain exceptions) 
must, in the aggregate, either:
     Create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, 
permanent job per $35,000 of CDBG funds used; or
     Provide goods or services to residents of an area, such as 
the number of low- and moderate-income persons

[[Page 61009]]

residing in the areas served by the assisted businesses amounts to at 
least one low- and moderate-income person per $350 of CDBG funds used.
    (c) CDBG Assistance Must Minimize Business and Job Displacement. 
Each applicant will evaluate the potential of each economic development 
project for causing displacement of existing businesses and lost jobs 
in the neighborhood where the project is proposed to be located. When 
the grantee concludes that the potential exists to cause displacement, 
given the size, scope or nature of the business, then the grantee must, 
to the extent practicable, take steps to minimize such displacement. 
The project file must document the grantee's review conclusions and, if 
applicable, the steps the grantee will take to minimize displacement.
    (d) Section 105(a)(17) Requirements. Section 105(a)(17) of the 1974 
HCD Act requires that an activity assisted under that section achieve 
one of the following criteria:
    (i) Creates or retains jobs for low- and moderate-income persons 
(note that a project which meets the national objective of principally 
benefitting low- and moderate-income persons by creating or retaining 
jobs, 51 percent of which are for low- and moderate-income persons, 
will be deemed to have met this criterion without any additional 
documentation);
    (ii) Prevents or eliminates slums or blight (note that a project 
which meets the national objective of aiding in the prevention or 
elimination of slums or blight on an area basis will be deemed to have 
met this criterion without any additional documentation);
    (iii) Meets an urgent need (note that a project which meets the 
national objective of meeting community development needs having a 
particular urgency will be deemed to have met this criterion without 
any additional documentation);
    (iv) Creates or retains businesses owned by community residents;
    (v) Assists businesses that provide goods or services needed by and 
affordable to low- and moderate-income residents;
    (vi) Provides technical assistance to promote any of the activities 
under (i) through (v) of this subsection.
    (e) National Objectives. As previously stated in this NOFA, all 
CDBG-assisted activities must address one of the three broad national 
objectives. Since economic development projects usually result in new 
employment or the retention of existing jobs, these activities most 
likely would be categorized as principally benefitting low- and 
moderate-income persons in this manner. Such projects will be 
considered to benefit low- and moderate-income persons where the 
criteria of 24 CFR 570.208(a)(4) are met. HUD will consider an activity 
to qualify under this provision where the activity involves jobs at 
least 51 percent of which are taken by or made available to such 
persons, or retained by such persons. The extent to which the proposed 
project will directly address employment opportunities for low- and 
moderate-income persons in the applicant jurisdiction will be a primary 
factor in HUD's assessment of the proposed program.
    The application must contain adequate documentation to explain 
fully, and to support, the process that will be used to ensure that 
project(s) comply with the low- and moderate-income employment 
requirements. The documentation must be sufficient to show that the 
process has been developed and that program participants have agreed to 
adhere to that process. In determining whether the person is a low- and 
moderate-income person for these activities, it is the person's family 
income at the time the CDBG assistance is provided that is 
determinative. When making judgments concerning whether an individual 
qualifies as a low- and moderate-income person, both family size and 
the income of the entire family must be considered. This consideration 
is necessary because a ``low- and moderate-income person'' is defined 
as a member of a low- and moderate-income family.
    HUD will accept a written certification by a person of his or her 
family income and size to establish low- and moderate-income status. 
The certification may simply state that the person's family income is 
below that required to be low- and moderate-income in that area. The 
form for such certification must include a statement that the 
information is subject to verification.
    In addition to person-by-person income certifications discussed 
above, under section 105(c)(4) of the 1974 HCD Act, an employee may be 
presumed to be a low- and moderate-income person if the employee 
resides in a census tract where not less than 70 percent of the 
residents are low- and moderate-income persons, and a presumption of 
low- and moderate-income may also be made if the business is located in 
and/or the employee resides in a census tract (or block numbering 
group) where 20 percent of the residents are in poverty. The key 
consideration in this presumption is the location of the business or 
employee. The documentation to support the presumption must contain the 
location. (See 24 CFR 570.209(b)(2)(v) for more information on this 
subject.)
    In cases where an activity (e.g., a shopping center or a super 
market) provides goods and services to residents of an area, the low- 
and moderate-income objective may be met by the area benefit 
requirements at 24 CFR 570.208(a)(1). To document low and moderate 
income, 51 percent of the residents of the area or block numbering 
group must be low- and moderate-income persons.
    (f) Application Requirements. To the extent feasible, the material 
listed below should be submitted for economic development projects. The 
material should be submitted for each proposed activity, whether the 
proposed activity is presented as a separate project or as part of a 
project involving multiple activities. Since economic development 
projects are rated against each other, the more completely these 
submission requirements are met, the greater the potential exists for 
enhancing the impact score of the project.
    (i) A letter from each appropriate developmental entity which 
includes at least the following information:
    a. A detailed physical description of the project with a schedule 
of events and maps or drawings as appropriate.
    b. The estimated costs for the project, including any working 
capital requirements.
    c. A discussion of all financing sources, including the need for 
CDBG, the terms of the CDBG assistance, and the proposed lien 
structure. The amount, source, and nature of any equity investment(s) 
must also be provided as well as a commitment to invest the equity.
    d. A discussion of employment impact which includes a schedule of 
newly created positions. The schedule should identify the number, 
salary and skill level of each permanent position to be created. If 
jobs are made available to low- and moderate-income persons, the 
applicant must also demonstrate and document how persons from low- and 
moderate-income households will be accorded first consideration for 
employment opportunities.
    e. A discussion of all appropriate feasibility issues including, 
but not limited to: site control, zoning, public approvals and permits, 
impact fees, corporate authorizations, infrastructure, environment and 
relocation.
    f. An analysis and summary of market and other data which supports 
the anticipated success of the project.
    g. A statement as to whether or not the project will result in the 
relocation

[[Page 61010]]

of any industrial or commercial plant, facility, or operation from one 
area to another. If the CDBG funded project will result in the 
relocation of a plant, facility, or operation, then the application 
shall include a statement as to the total number of jobs that are 
currently filled at the existing/current plant, facility, or operation 
and the number of jobs that are projected to exist at that former 
plant, facility, or operation after the proposed CDBG funded project is 
complete and fully operational.
    (ii) A development budget showing all costs for the project, 
including professional fees and working capital.
    (iii) Documentation to support project costs. Documentation 
generally should be from a third-party source and be consistent with 
the following guidelines:
    a. Acquisition costs should be supported by an appraisal.
    b. Construction/renovation costs should be certified by an 
architect, engineer or contractor. Use of Federal Prevailing Wage Rates 
should be cited where applicable.
    c. Machinery and equipment costs should be supported by vendor 
quotes.
    d. Soft costs (e.g., legal, accounting, title insurance) need be 
substantiated only where such costs are anticipated to be abnormally 
high.
    (iv) Letters from all financing sources discussing (at a minimum) 
the amount and terms of the proposed financing, and the current status 
of the application for funding.
    (v) Historical financial data of the development entity, preferably 
for the last 3 years. This information may be submitted under separate 
cover with confidentiality requested. It is recognized that historical 
financial data may be unavailable or inappropriate for some projects 
(e.g., start-up companies and real estate transactions).
    (vi) A 2- to 5-year cash flow pro forma with accompanying notes 
citing basic assumptions.
    (vii) The applicant's assessment of the project's consistency with 
the CDBG program eligibility requirements and standards for evaluating 
project cost, financial requirements and public benefit.
    d. Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Evaluation. Documentation for 
the 50 points for these items is the responsibility of the applicant. 
Claims of outstanding performance must be based upon actual 
accomplishments. Clear, precise documentation will be required. Maps 
must have a census tract or block numbering area (BNA), and they must 
be in accordance with the 1990 Census data. Additionally, maps must 
identify the locations of areas with minorities by census tract or BNA. 
If there are no minority areas, state so on the map. Only population 
data from the 1990 Census will be acceptable for purposes of this 
section.
    Please note that a ``minority'' is a person belonging to, or 
culturally identified as, a member of any one of the following racial/
ethnic categories: Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, and 
American Indian or Alaskan Native. For the purposes of this section, 
the separate category of ``women'' is not considered a minority.
    Counties claiming points under this criterion must use county-wide 
statistics (excluding entitlement communities). In the case of joint 
applications, points will be awarded based on the performance of the 
lead entity only.
    The following factors will be used to judge outstanding performance 
in these areas. Please note that points for outstanding performance may 
be claimed under each criterion:
    (1) Housing Achievements (40 points total). (a) Provision of Fair 
Housing Choice (20 points). (i) HUD will consider the extent to which 
the applicant demonstrates that it has provided housing assistance for 
low and moderate income families that results in housing choice in 
areas outside of minority or low- and moderate income concentration. 
Such actions may include the construction or rehabilitation of housing 
in areas outside of minority or low and moderate income concentration; 
the provision of Section 8 Existing Certificate or Voucher assistance 
in ways that lessen concentration of such assisted units within 
minority and low- and moderate income concentrated areas; or the 
provision of direct homeownership assistance such as homeownership 
counseling, downpayment assistance, or first-time homebuyer assistance. 
If applicable, the applicant may use a map to show the general 
location(s) of individual projects and/or housing occupied by Section 8 
Existing Program participants.
    (ii) Points also may be awarded for efforts which enable low- and 
moderate-income persons to remain in their neighborhood when such 
neighborhoods are experiencing revitalization and substantial 
displacement as a result of private reinvestment. Applicants requesting 
points under this criterion would not need to meet the requirements of 
paragraphs (a) and (b) in order to receive points. Points will be 
awarded where more than one-half of the families displaced were able to 
remain in their original neighborhood through the assistance of the 
applicant. Applicants must show that:
     The neighborhood experienced revitalization;
     The amount of displacement was substantial;
     Displacement was caused by private reinvestment;
     Low- and moderate-income persons were permitted to remain 
in the neighborhood as a result of action taken by the applicant.
    If the community is inhabited predominantly by persons who are 
members of minority and/or low-income groups, points will be awarded 
where there is a balanced distribution of assisted housing throughout 
the community.
    (b) Implementation of a Fair Housing Strategy that Affirmatively 
Furthers Fair Housing (20 points). The applicant must demonstrate that 
it is implementing or plans to implement a Fair Housing Strategy on its 
own or demonstrate that it does or plans to participate in a county/
State or regional analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. A 
fair housing strategy must include the following elements:
     Local compliance activities;
     Educational programs to enhance the clarity and 
understanding of the community's fair housing policy. For communities 
with few or no minorities, this should include publication in the 
surrounding communities of the applicant's policy of fair housing for 
minorities and persons with disabilities;
     Assistance to minority families;
     Special programs (e.g., utilization of Community Housing 
Resource Board (CHRB) Programs, efforts to encourage local realtors to 
enter into voluntary agreements to encourage equal access to financial 
institutions, etc.);
     Assistance to minority families through mobility 
counseling programs and other activities that encourage such families 
to pursue such housing opportunities outside of minority concentrated 
areas;
     Special programs targeted at lenders, builders, realtors, 
and other housing industry groups; and
     Affirmative marketing strategies targeted at those groups 
in the eligible population considered least likely to apply without 
special outreach.
    The fair housing strategy must include goals for each of the above 
elements. The date of adoption or development of the strategy should be 
indicated, as well as the date proposed activities will be or have been 
implemented.
    (2) Entrepreneurial Efforts and Local Equal Opportunity 
Performance. HUD encourages the use of minority

[[Page 61011]]

contracting, although it will not be used as an evaluation factor in 
this NOFA.
    (3) Equal Opportunity Employment (10 points). Under this factor, 
the applicant must document that its percentage of minority, permanent 
full-time employees is greater than the percentage of minorities within 
the county or the community, whichever is higher. Applicants with no 
full-time employees may claim points based on part-time employment 
provided that they document that the only permanent employment is on a 
part-time basis.
    e. Welfare to Work Initiative (5 points). Five bonus points will be 
added to proposals which support the Welfare to Work Initiative. These 
points will be added to those proposals that include activities which 
will provide assistance to persons moving from welfare to work. 
Examples of such activities are: jobs, day care slots, training or 
transportation assistance.
4. Final Selection
    The total points received by a project for all of the selection 
factors are added, and the project is ranked against all other projects 
from all applications, regardless of the program areas in which the 
projects were rated. The highest ranked projects will be funded to the 
extent funds are available. If an applicant submits two applications 
under this NOFA, it may receive up to two single grants in the amounts 
of the project or projects applied for in those applications which were 
ranked high enough to be funded. In the case of ties at the funding 
line, HUD will use the following criteria in order to break ties:
     The project receiving the highest program impact rating 
will be funded;
     If tied projects have the same program impact rating, the 
project having the highest combined score on the needs factors will be 
funded;
     If tied projects have the same program impact ratings and 
equal needs factor scores, the project having the highest score on the 
percent of persons in poverty needs factor will be funded; and
     If tied projects have the same program impact ratings, 
equal needs factor scores, and an equal percent of persons in poverty 
needs factor score, the application having the most outstanding 
performance in fair housing and equal opportunity will be funded.
    As soon as possible after the rating and ranking process has been 
completed, HUD will notify all applicants regarding their rating scores 
and funding status. Thereafter, applicants may contact HUD to discuss 
scores or any aspects of the selection process.

II. Application and Funding Award Process

A. Obtaining Applications

    All nonentitled communities in New York State may obtain 
application kits through HUD's New York or Buffalo Offices. The 
addresses for HUD's Buffalo and New York offices are:

Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Community 
Planning and Development, Attention: Small Cities Coordinator, 26 
Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278-0068. Telephone (212) 264-2885 x3401,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Planning and 
Development Division, Attention: Small Cities Coordinator 465 Main 
Street, Lafayette Court, Buffalo, NY 14203, Telephone (716) 551-5755 
x5800.

    In addition, application kits and additional information are 
available on the HUD website located at: www.hud.gov or by contacting 
Community Connections at (800) 998-9999.

B. Submitting Applications

    A final application must be submitted to HUD no later than March 7, 
2000. A final application includes an original and two photocopies. 
Final applications may be mailed, and if they are received after the 
deadline, must be postmarked no later than midnight, March 7, 2000. If 
an application is hand-delivered to the New York or Buffalo Offices, 
the application must be delivered by 4:00 p.m. on the application 
deadline date. Applicants in the counties of Sullivan, Ulster, Putnam, 
and in nonparticipating jurisdictions in the urban counties of 
Dutchess, Orange, Rockland, Westchester, Nassau, and Suffolk should 
submit applications to the New York Office. All other nonentitled 
communities in New York State should submit their applications to the 
Buffalo Office. Applications must be submitted to the HUD office at the 
addresses listed above in section II.A. of this NOFA.
    The above-stated application deadline is firm as to date and hour. 
In the interest of fairness to all competing applicants, HUD will treat 
as ineligible for consideration any application that is not received 
on, or postmarked by March 7, 2000. Applicants should take this 
practice into account and make early submission of their materials to 
avoid any risk of loss of eligibility brought about by unanticipated 
delays or other delivery-related problems.

C. The Application

1. Application Requirements
    An application for the Small Cities Program CDBG Grants is made by 
the submission of:
    (a) A completed HUD Form 4124, including HUD Forms 4124.1 through 
4124.6 and all appropriate supporting material;
    (b) A completed Standard Form 424;
    (c) A signed copy of certifications required under the CDBG 
Program, including, but not limited to the Drug-Free Workplace 
Certification, and the Certification Regarding Lobbying pursuant to 
section 319 of the Department of the Interior Appropriations Act for 
Fiscal Year 1990 (31 U.S.C. 1352), generally prohibiting use of 
appropriated funds, and, if applicable, Disclosure of Lobbying 
Activities (SF-LLL);
    (d) Form HUD-2880, Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/Update Report, as 
required under subpart A of 24 CFR part 4 (Accountability in the 
Provision of HUD Assistance); and, if applicable,
    (e) Abbreviated Consolidated Plan.
    (f) A Section 108 Loan Guarantee application or request, if 
applicable, consisting of one of the following:
    (1) A formal application for Section 108 Loan Guarantee(s), 
including the documents listed at Sec. 570.704(b);
    (2) A brief description of a Section 108 Loan Guarantee 
application(s) to be submitted within 60 days (with HUD reserving the 
right to extend such period for good cause on a case-by-case basis) of 
a notice of CDBG Small Cities grant award. (The CDBG grant award will 
be conditioned on approval of actual Section 108 Loan Guarantee 
commitments within a stated period of time.) This description must be 
sufficient to support the basic eligibility of the proposed project or 
activities for Section 108 assistance; or
    (3) If applicable, a copy of a Section 108 Loan Guarantee approval 
document with grant number and date of approval.
2. Streamlined Application Requirements for Certain Applicants
    Single Purpose applications submitted under the FY 1997/98 NOFA but 
not selected for funding will be reactivated for consideration under 
this NOFA, if the applicant notifies HUD in writing by March 7, 2000 
that the applicant wishes the prior application to be considered in 
this competition. Applications which are reactivated may be updated, 
amended or supplemented by the applicant provided that such amendment 
or supplementation is received no later than the due date for 
applications under this NOFA. If there

[[Page 61012]]

is no significant change in the application involving new activities or 
alteration of proposed activities that will significantly change the 
scope, location or objectives of the proposed activities or 
beneficiaries, there will be no further citizen participation 
requirement to keep the application active for a succeeding round or 
competition.

D. Funding Award Process

    In accordance with section 102 of the HUD Reform Act and HUD's 
regulation in 24 CFR part 4, HUD will notify the public by notice 
published in the Federal Register of all award decisions made by HUD 
under this competition. In accordance with the requirements of section 
102 of the Reform Act and HUD's regulations at 24 CFR part 4, HUD also 
will ensure that documentation and other information regarding each 
application submitted under this NOFA is sufficient to indicate the 
basis upon which assistance was provided or denied. Additionally, in 
accordance with Sec. 4.5(b) of these regulations, HUD will make this 
material available for public inspection for a period of 5 years, 
beginning not less than 30 calendar days after the date on which 
assistance is provided.

III. Technical Assistance

    Prior to the application deadline, the Buffalo and New York offices 
will provide technical assistance on request to individual applicants, 
including explaining and responding to questions regarding program 
regulations, and defining terms in the application package. In 
addition, HUD will conduct informational meetings around the State to 
discuss the Small Cities Program, and will conduct application 
workshops in conjunction with these meetings. Please contact the New 
York or Buffalo Office for further information regarding these 
meetings. Application kits will be available at these meetings, as well 
as from the New York or Buffalo Offices. In order to ensure that the 
application deadline is met, it is strongly suggested that applicants 
begin preparing their applications immediately and not wait for the 
informational meetings.

IV. Checklist of Application Submission Requirements

    The following checklist is intended to aid applicants in 
determining whether their application is complete:

Application Completeness Checklist

    Applicant: ________
    Amount Requested $________
    1. Is amount of funds requested within established maximum?
    2. Part I--Needs Description (HUD Form 4124.1)
    a. Program Area
    ____Housing
    ____Target Area
    ____Nontarget Area
    ____Public Facilities
    ____Economic Development (If an ``appropriate'' analysis is 
required but is not included, the application cannot be rated.)
    b. Is description of community development needs included in 
application?
    3. Part II--Community Development Activities (HUD Form 4124.2)
    a. Has national objective been identified for each activity?
    b. Will 70 percent of grant funds primarily benefit low-and 
moderate-income persons? (If not, the application cannot be rated.)
    4. Part III--Impact Description (HUD Form 4124.3)
    5. Part IV--Outstanding Performance (HUD Form 4124.4)
    6. Part V--Program Schedule (HUD Form 4124.5)
    7. Part VI--Maps
    a. Location of proposed activities. (Applicants must show the 
boundaries of the defined area or areas.)
    b. Location of areas with minorities by census tract. (If there are 
no minority areas, state so on the map.)
    c. Housing conditions if project involves housing rehabilitation. 
(Number and location of each standard and substandard unit should be 
clearly identified.)
    8. a. Is Standard Form 424 complete?
    Yes    No
    b. Is original signature on at least one copy?
    Yes    No
    9. Is Certification signed with original signature?
    Yes    No
    10. Has the abbreviated consolidated plan been prepared and 
submitted to HUD (or included with this application)?
    11. Form HUD-2880, Application/Recipient Disclosure/Update Report.
    12. Do proposed economic development activities meet the public 
benefit standards as defined in 24 CFR 570.209?

V. Corrections to Deficient Applications

    Under no circumstances will HUD accept from the applicant 
unsolicited information regarding the application after the application 
deadline has passed.
    HUD may advise applicants of technical deficiencies in applications 
and permit them to be corrected. A technical deficiency would be an 
error or oversight which, if corrected, would not alter, in either a 
positive or negative fashion, the review and rating of the application. 
Examples of curable technical deficiencies would be a failure to submit 
the proper certifications or failure to submit an application 
containing an original signature by an authorized official. Situations 
not considered curable would be, for example, a failure to submit 
program impact descriptions.
    HUD will notify applicants in writing of any curable technical 
deficiencies in applications. Applicants will have 14 calendar days 
from the date of HUD's correspondence to reply and correct the 
deficiency. If the deficiency is not corrected within this time period, 
HUD will reject the application as incomplete.
    Applicants should note that if an abbreviated consolidated plan is 
not submitted, the failure to submit it in a timely manner is not 
considered a curable deficiency.

VI. Findings and Certifications

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

    The information collection requirements related to this CDBG 
program have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520), and have been assigned OMB approval number 2506-0020. An agency 
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, 
a collection of information unless the collection displays a valid 
control number.

Environmental Impact

    This NOFA provides funding under, and does not alter environmental 
requirements of, a regulation previously published in the Federal 
Register. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(5), this NOFA is 
categorically excluded from environmental review under the National 
Environmental Policy Act. The environmental review provisions of this 
regulation are in 24 CFR 570.604.

Federalism

    The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under section 6(a) 
of Executive Order 12612, Federalism, has determined that this NOFA 
will not have substantial, direct effects on States, on their political 
subdivisions, or on their relationship with the Federal Government, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between them and 
other levels of government.

[[Page 61013]]

While the NOFA will provide financial assistance to the Small Cities 
Program of New York State, none of its provisions will have an effect 
on the relationship between the Federal Government and New York State, 
or the State's political subdivisions.

Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance

    See Section I.A.4. of this NOFA.

Prohibition Against Lobbying Activities

    Applicants for funding under this NOFA are subject to the 
provisions of section 319 of the Department of Interior and Related 
Agencies Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (31 U.S.C. 1352) (the 
Byrd Amendment) and to the provisions of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 
1995 (Pub. L. 104-65; December 19, 1995).
    The Byrd Amendment, which is implemented in regulations at 24 CFR 
part 87, prohibits applicants for Federal contracts and grants from 
using appropriated funds to attempt to influence Federal executive or 
legislative officers or employees in connection with obtaining such 
assistance, or with its extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or 
modification. The Byrd Amendment applies to the funds that are the 
subject of this NOFA. Therefore, applicants must file a certification 
stating that they have not made and will not make any prohibited 
payments and, if any payments or agreement to make payments of 
nonappropriated funds for these purposes have been made, a form SF-LLL 
disclosing such payments must be submitted. The certification and the 
SF-LLL are included in the application package.
    The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, which repealed section 112 of 
the HUD Reform Act and resulted in the elimination of the regulations 
at 24 CFR part 86, requires all persons and entities who lobby covered 
executive or legislative branch officials to register with the 
Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
and file reports concerning their lobbying activities.

Prohibition Against Advance Information on Funding Decisions

    Section 103 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development 
Reform Act of 1989, and HUD's implementing regulation codified at 
subpart B of 24 CFR part 4, applies to the funding competition 
announced today. These requirements continue to apply until the 
announcement of the selection of successful applicants. HUD employees, 
including those conducting technical assistance sessions or workshops 
and those involved in the review of applications and in the making of 
funding decisions, are limited by section 103 from providing advance 
information to any person (other than an authorized employee of HUD) 
concerning funding decisions, or from otherwise giving any applicant an 
unfair competitive advantage. Persons who apply for assistance in this 
competition should confine their inquiries to the subject areas 
permitted under section 103 and subpart B of 24 CFR part 4.
    Applicants who have ethics related questions should contact the HUD 
Ethics Law Division at (202) 708-3815. (This is not a toll-free 
number.)

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number for this program 
is 14.219.

    Dated: October 29, 1999.
Joseph A. D'Agosta,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development.
[FR Doc. 99-29173 Filed 11-5-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-33-P