[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58340-58344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-27197]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MD081-3043a; FRL-6449-3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
State of Maryland; Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are converting our conditional approval of the State of 
Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for an enhanced 
vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program, which was granted on 
July 31, 1997 (61 FR 40938), to a full approval. In the State of 
Maryland the I/M program is known as the vehicle emissions inspection 
program (VEIP). In our July 31, 1997 conditional approval, we imposed 
fifteen conditions for full approval. We have determined that Maryland 
has met all of those conditions for full approval. The intent of this 
action is to convert our conditional approval of Maryland's VEIP SIP to 
a full approval.

DATES: This rule is effective on December 28, 1999 without further 
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by November 29, 
1999. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely 
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform 
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to David L. Arnold, Chief, 
Ozone and Mobile Sources Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air 
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103; the Air and 
Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460; and the Maryland 
Department of the Environment, 2500 Broening Highway, Baltimore, 
Maryland, 21224. Please contact Christopher Cripps at (215) 814-2179 if 
you wish to arrange an appointment to view the docket at the 
Philadelphia office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Cripps, (215) 814-2179, at 
the EPA Region III address above, or by e-mail at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    This Supplementary Information section is organized as follows:

I. What action is EPA taking today?
II. Who is affected by this action?
III. Who will benefit from this action?
IV. What Maryland SIP revision is the topic of this action?
V. What were the requirements for full approval of the Maryland 
program?
VI. How did Maryland fulfill these requirements for full approval?
VII. What is EPA doing Regarding Vehicles at Federal Facilities?
VIII. EPA Action
IX. Administrative Requirements

I. What Action is EPA Taking Today?

    In this action, we are converting our conditional approval of 
Maryland's I/M program as a revision to the SIP to a full approval.

II. Who is Affected by This Action?

    Residents of the following jurisdictions in Maryland: Anne Arundel 
County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Carroll County, Cecil County, 
Charles County, Frederick County, Harford County, Howard County, 
Montgomery County, Queen Anne's County, Washington County and Baltimore 
City. It is important to note that our action today does not impose any 
new requirements on Maryland residents; we are merely granting full 
approval (versus the conditional approval previously granted) to the 
Maryland laws and regulations already in place at the state level to 
implement enhanced I/M in Maryland. These laws and regulations were 
made part of the Maryland SIP by the conditional approval that was 
published on July 31, 1997.

III. Who Will Benefit From This Action?

    The residents of Maryland will benefit from this program, which is 
designed to keep vehicles maintained and operating within pollution 
control standards. Because air pollution does not recognize political 
boundaries, neighboring states' residents will also benefit from 
implementation of this program, designed to prevent excessive vehicle 
pollution.

IV. What Maryland SIP Revision is the Topic of this Action?

    This notice deals with a revision to the State of MD SIP entitled 
``Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program (SIP Revision 98-13)'' 
which was submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the 
Environment (MDE) September 25, 1998 and supplemented on May 25, 1999. 
Today we are acting only upon this September 25, 1998, SIP revision and 
supplemental submittals to determine that Maryland satisfied certain 
deficiencies of its conditionally approved enhanced I/M plan, and in so 
doing we are not reopening our July 31, 1997, final rulemaking granting 
conditional approval of Maryland's enhanced I/M SIP submitted on July 
10, 1995, as supplemented on March 27, 1996.

V. What Were the Requirements for Full Approval of the Maryland 
Program?

    Approval of Maryland's I/M program SIP was subject to 15 conditions 
which are summarized in Table 1. These were also discussed in detail in 
our July 31, 1997 conditional approval.

VI. How Did Maryland Fulfill These Requirements for Full Approval?

    On September 25, 1998, Maryland submitted revisions to its enhanced 
I/M SIP to EPA in order to correct conditions for full approval, as 
detailed in Table 1.

[[Page 58341]]



       Table 1.--Satisfaction of the Conditions for Full Approval
     [Major Conditions `` As Summarized from the July 31, 1997 Rule]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            How Maryland Satisfied the
     Requirement for Full Approval                 Requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Submit fully adopted regulations     Maryland submitted copies of
 for the enhanced I/M program.            fully adopted enhanced I/M
                                          regulations, COMAR 26.11.14
                                          ``Vehicle Emissions Inspection
                                          Program'', adopted on November
                                          21, 1997, and on September 16,
                                          1998.
(2) Provide an opinion from the          Maryland submitted a
 Attorney General's Office or             Certification by the Maryland
 legislation that demonstrates that the   Attorney General's Office that
 legislative authority for the program    Maryland's Transportation
 expires no earlier than November 15,     Article authorizes the
 2005.                                    Maryland I/M program for as
                                          long as is required by federal
                                          law.
(3) Submit a modeling demonstration of   Maryland submitted an
 the program using appropriate            acceptable modeling
 assumptions for the years 2002 and       demonstration of their
 2005.                                    program.
(4) Demonstrate that adequate funding    Maryland submitted staffing and
 and tools exist for the years 1997 and   budget data for the years 1997
 1998 for running the program. This       and 1998.
 included information on the numbers of
 personnel dedicated to the I/M program
 areas and budget allocations for
 equipment resources.
(5) Provide an explanation of how all    Maryland provided information
 vehicles in the I/M program will be      on how vehicles in the I/M
 identified Maryland provided             program are identified.
 information on how vehicles in the I/M   Maryland law requires
 program are identified.                  residents residing in the
                                          program area to register these
                                          vehicles properly. This is
                                          enforced by checking
                                          registration information
                                          whenever a vehicle is stopped
                                          by police for any reason and
                                          by surveys of parked vehicles
                                          to identify vehicles with out-
                                          of-state tags that are
                                          operated routinely in or by de
                                          facto residents of the program
                                          area.
(6) Provide information on applicable    Maryland submitted a copy the
 Maryland law and regulations on how      Maryland law that prohibits
 ``engine switching is handled'' and      any modification to the
 how vehicles without a certified         vehicle's original emission
 configuration will be testing.           control system Maryland
                                          submitted a procedures
                                          document which specifies that
                                          Maryland's engine switch
                                          guidelines require that a
                                          switched engine must meet or
                                          exceed the requirements for
                                          the vehicles model year and
                                          class and that owners of
                                          vehicles with a non-certified
                                          engine configuration or
                                          replacement engine may request
                                          a one-time extension, which
                                          may not exceed one-year, to
                                          the emission testing
                                          requirements in order to bring
                                          the vehicle into compliance.
(7) Submit written specifications for    Maryland submitted written
 gas cap testing.                         specifications for gas cap
                                          testing.
(8) Submit a description of Maryland's   Maryland submitted the
 practice of issuing short-term time      procedures and documentation
 extensions due to economic hardship      that adequately address the
 and the time limit(s) for such           issuance of short-term time
 exemptions.                              extensions due to economic
                                          hardship and the time limit
                                          for such exemptions.
(9) Submit documentation regarding: (a)  Maryland submitted the
 aspects of the I/M program as applied    procedures for handling
 to exemptions for residents out-of-      exemptions for residents out-
 state, to residents newly located in     of-state, the procedures and
 the I/M program area, and to require     documentation that adequately
 confirmation of exempt status, and (b)   address residents newly
 citation of owners for noncompliance     located in The I/M program
 with Maryland's registration             areas and that require
 requirements and practices regarding     verification of exempt status.
 impounding of vehicles.                  Maryland submitted the
                                          procedures and documentation
                                          that adequately address
                                          citation of owners for
                                          noncompliance with Maryland's
                                          registration requirements and
                                          practices regarding impounding
                                          of vehicles.
(10) Demonstrate that Maryland's         Maryland submitted acceptable
 enforcement program oversight is         quality assurance oversight
 quality controlled and quality assured.  procedures and documentation.
(11) Provide a description of            Maryland submitted a
 Maryland's auditing program.             description of Maryland's
                                          auditing program.
(12) Submit documentation regarding the  Maryland submitted the current
 penalty schedule applicable to the I/M   penalty schedule for the I/M
 program contractor.                      program contractor.
(13) Submit evidence that inspectors     Maryland submitted a procedures
 must be re-certified at least every      document that requires such
 two years or less.                       recertification every 24
                                          months.
(14) Submit documentation on how it      Maryland submitted a procedures
 investigates and responds to motorist    document that outlines the
 complaints, and submit documentation     procedures used to investigate
 relating to protection of whistle        and respond to complaints
 blowers.                                Maryland submitted a copy of
                                          Maryland Code Title 5,
                                          subtitle 3 which provides for
                                          whistle blower protection.
(15) Start mandatory testing of all      On October 1, 1997 Maryland
 subject vehicles as soon as possible,    commenced implementation of
 or by November 15, 1997 at the latest.   its VEIP and required affected
                                          vehicles to pass I/M testing
                                          as a condition of eligibility
                                          for registration.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

VII. What is EPA Doing Regarding Vehicles at Federal Facilities?

    EPA is not requiring Maryland to implement section 40 CFR 
51.356(a)(4) of the I/M rule which deals with federal installations 
within I/M areas at this time. The Department of Justice has 
recommended to EPA that this regulation be revised since it appears to 
grant states authority to regulate federal installations in 
circumstances where the federal government has not waived sovereign 
immunity. Federally owned vehicles operated in Maryland are required to 
meet the same requirements as Maryland registered vehicles, but it 
would not be appropriate to require compliance with this regulation if 
it is not constitutionally authorized. EPA will be revising this 
provision in the future and will review state I/M SIPs with respect to 
this issue when this new rule is final. EPA is not approving or 
disapproving requirements which apply to federal facilities at this 
time.

VIII. EPA Action

    EPA is converting its conditional approval of Maryland's enhanced 
I/M program to a full approval the exception of the provisions 
regarding federal facilities. EPA is not approving or disapproving 
requirements which apply to federal facilities at this time. An 
extensive discussion of Maryland's enhanced I/M program and our 
rationale for our approval action was provided in the previous final 
rule that

[[Page 58342]]

conditionally approved the enhanced
I/M program (see 62 FR 40938 and 61 FR 56194). This action to convert 
our conditional approval to a full approval is being published without 
prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and 
because we anticipate no adverse comments. In a separate document in 
the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register publication, we 
are proposing to convert our conditional approval of Maryland's 
enhanced I/M program SIP revision to a full approval if adverse 
comments are filed. This action will be effective without further 
notice unless we receive relevant adverse comment by November 29, 1999. 
If we receive such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take 
effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule 
based on the proposed rule. Any parties interested in commenting must 
do so at this time. If no such comments are received by November 29, 
1999, you are advised that this action will be effective on December 
28, 1999.

IX. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
regulatory action from review under E.O. 12866, entitled ``Regulatory 
Planning and Review.''

B. Executive Orders on Federalism

    Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a state, local, or 
tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds 
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those 
governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. requires EPA to 
provide to the Office of Management and Budget a description of the 
extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected 
state, local, and tribal governments, the nature of their concerns, 
copies of written communications from the governments, and a statement 
supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875 
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected 
officials and other representatives of state, local, and tribal 
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development 
of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.'' 
Today's rule does not create a mandate on state, local or tribal 
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these 
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 
do not apply to this rule. On August 4, 1999, President Clinton issued 
a new executive order on federalism, Executive Order 13132, (64 FR 
43255 (August 10, 1999),) which will take effect on November 2, 1999. 
In the interim, the current Executive Order 12612 (52 FR 41685 (October 
30, 1987)) on federalism still applies. This rule will not have a 
substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the 
national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified 
in Executive Order 12612. The rule affects only one State, and does not 
alter the relationship or the distribution of power and 
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.

C. Executive Order 13045

    E.O. 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies 
to any rule that the EPA determines (1) is ``economically 
significant,'' as defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) the environmental 
health or safety risk addressed by the rule has a disproportionate 
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the 
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the 
planned rule on children and explain why the planned regulation is 
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible 
alternatives considered by the Agency. This final rule is not subject 
to E.O. 13045 because it is not an economically significant regulatory 
action as defined by E.O. 12866, and it does not address an 
environmental health or safety risk that would have a disproportionate 
effect on children.

D. Executive Order 13084

    Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the 
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by the tribal governments. If EPA complies by 
consulting, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to provide to the Office 
of Management and Budget, in a separately identified section of the 
preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
consultation with representatives of affected tribal governments, a 
summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the 
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected and 
other representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide 
meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory policies 
on matters that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' 
Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities 
of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve or impose 
any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the 
requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies 
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small 
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental 
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under 
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create 
any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is 
already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not 
create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the 
Clean Air Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute 
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

    Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; 
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA 
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
that

[[Page 58343]]

achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory 
requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for 
informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly 
or uniquely impacted by the rule. EPA has determined that the approval 
action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that may result 
in estimated annual costs of $100 million or more to either State, 
local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private 
sector. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under 
State or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no 
additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the 
private sector, result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

H. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action to convert our conditional approval of 
Maryland's enhanced I/M program to a full approval must be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 
28, 1999. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of 
this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the 
purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a 
petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the 
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action converting our 
conditional approval of the Maryland enhanced I/M SIP to a full 
approval may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone.

    Dated: September 28, 1999.
W. Michael McCabe,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    Chapter I, title 40, of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart V--Maryland

    2. Section 52.1070 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(144) to read 
as follows:


Sec. 52.1070  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (144) Revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan submitted 
by the Maryland Department of the Environment on July 10, 1995, March 
27, 1996, and September 25, 1998 as supplemented on May 25, 1999:
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Letter of July 10, 1995, from the Maryland Department of the 
Environment transmitting an Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection 
Program.
    (B) Regulations for the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program COMAR 
11.14.08. adopted by the Secretary of the Environment on August 1, 
1994, effective January 2, 1995:
    (1) COMAR 11.14.08.01 through COMAR 11.14.08.02, inclusive.
    (2) COMAR 11.14.08.03A.
    (3) COMAR 11.14.08.03A(1).
    (4) COMAR 11.14.08.03A(2) except the word ``federal,'' in the first 
line.
    (5) COMAR 11.14.08.03B.
    (6) COMAR 11.14.08.04.
    (7) COMAR 11.14.08.05, section A.
    (8) COMAR 11.14.08.05 sections B(1) through (7), inclusive.
    (9) COMAR 11.14.08.05 sections C. through F., inclusive.
    (10) COMAR 11.14.08.06 through COMAR 11.14.08.42, inclusive.
    (C) Letter of March 27, 1996, from the Maryland Department of the 
Environment transmitting amendments to the Enhanced Vehicle Emissions 
Inspection Program.
    (D) Letter of September 25, 1998, from the Maryland Department of 
the Environment transmitting amendments to the Enhanced Vehicle 
Emissions Inspection Program.
    (E) The following revisions to the provisions of COMAR 11.14.08 
adopted by the Secretary of the Environment on November 21, 1996, 
effective December 16, 1996:
    (1) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.03B.
    (2) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.03C.
    (3) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.05B(4).
    (4) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.06D(7).
    (5) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.09A to .09B, .09B to .09C, .09C to 
.09D and .09D to. 09E, .09E to .09F, and .09F to .09G.
    (6) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09A, A(1) and A(3).
    (7) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(1), B(1)(a), B(1)(b), B(2), 
B(3), B(3)(a), B(3)(b) and B(4).
    (8) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09E.
    (9) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09-1 except the phrase 
``and, to the extent allowed by federal law, a vehicle owned by the 
federal government'' in section COMAR 11.14.08.09-1A.
    (10) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.06B(3) to B(4), B(4) to B(5), B(5) 
to B(6), and B(6) to B(7).
    (11) Creation of a new COMAR 11.14.08.06B(3) from the last two 
sentences of COMAR 11.14.08.06B(2).
    (12) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10B(3).
    (13) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10C.
    (14) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.10C(1), C(1)(a) through C(1)(c), 
inclusive, and C(2).
    (15) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.10C(2)(a) to C(1), C(2)(b) to C(2), 
C(2)(c) to C(3), C(2)(d) to C(4), C(2)(e) to C(5), and C(2)(f) to C(6).
    (16) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.11-1 except the phrase 
``and, to the extent allowed by federal law, a vehicle owned by the 
federal government'' in section COMAR 11.14.08.11-1A.
    (17) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.12A.
    (18) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.12A(1) through .12A(6), inclusive.
    (19) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.12B(1).
    (20) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.29A(2).
    (21) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.30D(2).
    (22) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32A.
    (23) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32B(5).
    (24) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.42.
    (F) The following revisions to the provisions of COMAR 11.14.08 
adopted by the Secretary of the Environment on September 16, 1998, 
effective October 19, 1998:

[[Page 58344]]

    (1) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.02B(40), B(40(a), and B(40)(b).
    (2) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.03C.
    (3) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.03C and .03D.
    (4) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.06A(2).
    (5) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.06A(3)(k), (p), (q) and (r).
    (6) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.06A(3)(s) and (t) to COMAR 
11.14.08.06A(3)(t) and (u), respectively.
    (7) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.06A(3)(s).
    (8) Amendment of COMAR 11.14.08.06D(7).
    (9) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.07C.
    (10) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09A.
    (11) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.09A(1) through .09A(3), inclusive.
    (12) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09A(1).
    (13) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09A(2), A(2)(a) and A(2)(b).
    (14) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B, B(1), B(1)(a) and 
B(1)(a)(i).
    (15) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(1)(b).
    (16) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(2) and B(2)(a).
    (17) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(3).
    (18) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(3)(a) and (b).
    (19) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09A(4).
    (20) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09A(4)(a).
    (21) Renumbering of COMAR 11.14.08.09E to .09F, .09F to .09G, and 
.09G to .09H.
    (22) Reservation with notes of COMAR 11.14.08.09C and .09D,
    (23) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.09E.
    (24) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09F and .09G.
    (25) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10B(1)(c) and B(1)(d).
    (26) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10C(6)(b).
    (27) Renumbering of COMAR 11.14.08.11 to COMAR 11.14.08.11-1.
    (28) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.11.
    (29) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.11-1, .11-1A(3), .11-1A(4), 11-
1B, 11-1B(4) and 11-1B(5).
    (30) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.11-1C.
    (31) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.11-1D(1) and 11-1D(2).
    (32) Amendment to COMAR 11.14.08.12.
    (33) Renumbering of COMAR 11.14.08.12B to .12C.
    (34) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.12A.
    (35) Addition a new COMAR 11.14.08.12B and .12B(1).
    (36) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.12B(2).
    (37) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.12C(1) and C(3).
    (38) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.15C(7)(c).
    (39) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.16.
    (40) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.16C to COMAR 11.14.08.16D.
    (41) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.16A and .16B.
    (42) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.16C.
    (43) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.16D.
    (44) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.22C to COMAR 11.14.08.22D.
    (45) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.22A and .22B.
    (46) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.22C.
    (47) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.27C(2).
    (48) The deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.27C(3).
    (49) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.27C(4) to COMAR 11.14.08.27C(3).
    (50) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.28A.
    (51) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32A.
    (52) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32B(5).
    (53) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.42.
    (G) Letter of May 25, 1999, from the Maryland Department of the 
Environment transmitting amendments to the Enhanced Vehicle Emissions 
Inspection Program.
    (ii) Additional material.
    (A) Remainder of the July 10, 1995, submittal;
    (B) Remainder of March 27, 1996, submittal;
    (C) Remainder of September 25, 1998, submittal; and
    (D) Remainder of May 25, 1999, submittal.


Sec. 52.1072  [Amended]

    3. In Sec. 52.1072, paragraph (a) is removed and reserved.

[FR Doc. 99-27197 Filed 10-28-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P