[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57555-57556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-27791]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-SW-59-AD; Amendment 39-11390; AD 99-22-12]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model AS332C, L, and
L1 Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to Eurocopter France Model AS332C, L, and L1 helicopters,
that requires replacing certain electrical modules with airworthy
electrical modules. This amendment is prompted by the discovery of
several defective electrical modules. The actions specified by this AD
are intended to prevent loss of electrical continuity, which could
cause loss of critical systems and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 30, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McCallister, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, Fort
Worth, Texas 76193-0110, telephone (817) 222-5121, fax (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to Eurocopter France Model AS332C, L,
and L1 helicopters was published in the Federal Register on May 20,
1999 (64 FR 27483). That action proposed to require replacing certain
electrical modules with airworthy electrical modules.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the
proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public. The FAA
has determined that air safety and the public interest require the
adoption of the rule as proposed except for two nonsubstantive changes
that have been made to paragraph (b) and Note 2 of the AD. In paragraph
(b), the NPRM incorrectly states that alternative methods of compliance
(AMOC) or adjustments of the compliance time may be approved by the
``Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate.''
This is incorrect and has been changed to state that the Manager,
Regulations Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, is responsible for approving
any AMOC or adjustment of the compliance time. Note 2 of the NPRM
states that information concerning the existence of approved AMOC may
be obtained from the ``Rotorcraft Certification Office;'' this is also
incorrect and has been changed to state that information may be
obtained from the ``Regulations Group.'' The FAA has determined that
these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator
nor increase the scope of the AD.
The FAA estimates that 3 helicopters of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 320 work hours per
helicopter to replace all affected modules, and that the average labor
rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately
$23,484, but the helicopter manufacturer has stated that the parts will
be provided at no cost. Based on these figures, the total cost impact
of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $57,600 to replace all
affected modules.
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 57556]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
AD 99-22-12 Eurocopter France: Amendment 39-11390. Docket No. 98-
SW-59-AD.
Applicability: Model AS332C, L, and L1 helicopters, certificated
in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required within 300 hours time-in-service (TIS) or
within the next 3 calendar months, whichever occurs first, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent loss of electrical continuity, which could cause loss
of critical systems, and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Remove and replace each ``CONNECTRAL'' green electrical
module that does not have a white dot on the face and that has a
manufacturing code 95/16 through 96/21 engraved on a side, with an
airworthy electrical module. Those manufacturing codes identify
modules manufactured between the beginning of the 16th week of 1995
and the end of the 21st week of 1996.
Note 1: Eurocopter France Service Bulletin No. 01.00.51, dated
May 4, 1998, pertains to the subject of this AD.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and
then send it to the Manager, Regulations Group.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Regulations Group.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) This amendment becomes effective on November 30, 1999.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in Direction
Generale De L'Aviation Civile (France) AD No. 98-254-070(A), dated
July 1, 1998.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 18, 1999.
Eric Bries,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 99-27791 Filed 10-25-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P