[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 1999)] [Notices] [Pages 56560-56562] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 99-27369] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-41996; File No. SR-NYSE-98-47] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Rule 440 I Requiring Records of Compensation Arrangements Concerning Floor Brokerage October 8, 1999. I. Introduction On December 23, 1998, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'' or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to adopt Rule 440 I, requiring records of compensation arrangements concerning floor brokerage. On May 14, 1999, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Letter to Richard Strasser, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation (``Division''), SEC, from James E. Buck, Senior Vice President and Secretary, NYSE, dated May 12, 1999. In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange explained why the proposed rule change would apply only to floor members and member organizations but not to ``upstairs'' members and member organizations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change and Amendment No. 1 were published for comment in the Federal Register on June 2, 1999.\4\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. On June 23, 1999, the NYSE submitted Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\5\ This notice and order approves the proposed rule change as amended and seeks comment from interested persons concerning Amendment No. 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41441 (May 24, 1999), 64 FR 29723. \5\ See Letter to Richard Strasser, Assistant Director, Division, SEC, from Daniel Parker Odell, Assistant Secretary, NYSE, dated June 22, 1999. In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange revised the proposed rule test in Supplementary Material .10(a) to exclude compensation arrangements involving gross compensation of less than $5,000, rather than the originally proposed level of $10,000. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposal Proposed Rule 440 I would require that every member not associated with a member organization, and each member organization primarily engaged as an agent in executing transactions on the Floor of the Exchange, maintain a [[Page 56561]] written record of each type of compensation arrangement that they enter into with other members, member organizations, non-member organizations, or customers relating to transactions on the Floor. The written record would include a description of each type of arrangement and identify, by name, the parties to each type of arrangement in effect. In addition, proposed Rule 440 I, Supplementary Material .10 would exclude the following compensation arrangements from the requirement to maintain a written record: (1) Arrangements involving gross compensation of less than $5,000 per year; \6\ and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Arrangements involving orders transmitted solely through the Exchange's electronic order routing system.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The NYSE is proposing to exclude orders transmitted solely through the Exchange's electronic order routing system because the Exchange believes the automatic feature of this system prevents manipulation by independent floor brokers. Telephone conversation between Mary Anne Furlong, Director, Rule and Interpretive Standards, NYSE, and Heather Traeger, Attorney, Division, SEC, on July 16, 1999. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 440 I, Supplementary Material .20 would provide that a member or member organization is deemed to be primarily engaged as an agent in executing transactions on the Floor of the Exchange if at least 75% of its revenue is derived from floor brokerage. The proposed would apply to members and member organizations primarily engaged as agents in executing transactions on the Floor of the Exchange. It would specify a type of record, records of compensation arrangements, in addition to the records required to be maintained under Exchange Act Rules 17a-3 \8\ and 17a-4,\9\ that the Exchange believes is critical to providing the Exchange the ability to monitor floor broker activities. The proposed would not apply to ``upstairs'' (i.e., off the Floor) members and member organizations. The proposal explains that independent brokers do not generally have independent supervisory structures nor are they subject to the same formalized internal supervisory oversight as ``upstairs'' organizations because many independent brokers act as sole proprietors with a limited customer and product base. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ 17 CFR 240.18a-3. \9\ 17 CFR 240.18a-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b).\10\ Specifically, the Commission believes that by strengthening the Exchange's ability to examine and surveil activities on the Exchange Floor, the proposal is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \12\ In approving this rule, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change is intended to fulfill some of the requirements of the undertakings contained in the order issued by the Commission relating to the settlement of an enforcement action against the NYSE for failure to enforce compliance with Section 11(a) and Rule 11a-1 of the Exchange Act and NYSE Rules 90, 95 and 111.\3\ The SEC Order found that the NYSE's floor broker regulatory program suffered from two major deficiencies: (1) The NYSE failed to take appropriate action to police for profit-sharing or other performance-based compensation of independent floor brokers; and (2) the NYSE suspended its routine independent floor broker surveillance for extensive periods of time.\14\ Pursuant to the SEC Order, among other things, the NYSE agreed and was ordered to enhance and improve by June 28, 2000 its regulation of independent floor brokers, member firm floor brokers, specialists, registered competitive market makers and competitive traders (collectively ``Floor Members'') by: (a) examining the floor trading activities of all floor members every two years; (b) ongoing, continuous surveillance of all floor members; (c) thoroughly investigating indications of possible violations by floor members; (d) ensuring that members of its regulatory staff are present on the NYSE trading floor during trading hours to surveil for potential trading violations; (e) ensuring adequate coordination among all staff responsible for floor members surveillance, investigations, and disciplinary matters; and (f) increasing staff with adequate expertise in the regulations of floor members within the Department of Member Trading Analysis. The Commission believes that, by strengthening the Exchange's ability to examine and surveil independent floor brokers' activities on the Exchange Floor, the proposed rule change is consistent with and is an important step toward satisfying certain of the undertakings relating to floor broker oversight. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See In the Matter of New York Stock Exchange, Inc., SEC Release No. 34-41574, June 29, 1999; Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-9925 (``SEC Ordeer''). \14\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposal requires members and member organizations primarily engaged as agents in executing transactions on the Floor of the Exchange (i.e., firms where 75% of revenue is derived from floor brokerage) to maintain a detailed written record of their compensation agreements, unless the arrangement involves gross compensation of less than $5,000 per year or involves orders transmitted solely through the Exchange's electronic order routing system. The Commission finds that requiring members and member organizations to maintain records of these compensation arrangements will facilitate the Exchange's review of such arrangements on an ongoing basis is part of the routine examination process, as well as on a for cause basis, for compliance with Section 11(a) of the Act \15\ in terms of whether any such arrangement constitutes a member or member organization having an interest in an account. The Commission also finds that enhancing the recordkeeping requirement of this limited group of Exchange members with respect to compensation arrangements is consistent with the Exchange's responsibility, under Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ Subject to certain exemptions, Section 11(a) prohibits a member or member organization from executing on the Exchange an order for that member's or member organization's ``own account'' or any account in which the member or member organization has an interest. 15 U.S.C. 78k(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange clarifies that the scope of the proposal encompasses ``$2 brokers'' or ``independent brokers'' but excludes ``upstairs'' members and member organizations. The proposal explains that independent brokers do not generally have independent supervisory structures nor are they subject to the same formalized internal supervisory oversight as ``upstairs'' organizations because many independent brokers act as sole proprietors with a limited customer and product base. Requiring independent floor brokers to maintain records of [[Page 56562]] compensation arrangements will facilitate the Exchange's ability to monitor independent floor broker activities, which may lack the internal safeguards in place at upstairs firms. The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment No. 2 to proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register. Amendment No. 2 revises the proposed rule text in Supplementary Material .10(a) to exclude compensation arrangements involving gross compensation of less than $5,000, rather than the originally proposed level of $10,000. The Commission believes that the change in the compensation threshold is consistent with proposed Rule 440 I's intent to help the Exchange surveil for potentially abusive compensation arrangements without adding an undue burden of those firms required to keep records under the proposed rule. Accordingly, the Commission finds that good cause exists, consistent with Section 6(b)(5) \16\ and Section 19b(b)(2) of the Act,\17\ to grant accelerated approval of Amendment No. 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning Amendment No. 2, including whether Amendment No. 2 is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submission should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the above-mentioned self-regulatory organization. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-98-47 and should be submitted by November 10, 1999. V. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\18\ that the proposed change (SR-NYSE-98-47), as amended, is approved. \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 99-27369 Filed 10-19-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-M