[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54541-54543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-25747]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

25 CFR Part 516

RIN 3141-AA20


Administrative Practice and Procedure; Testimony; Information; 
Response to Subpoena

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming Commission issues a final rule 
describing the duties of its personnel and former personnel with 
respect to litigation involving the National Indian Gaming Commission 
or the official responsibilities of National Indian Gaming Commission 
employees.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 8, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard B. Schiff, National Indian 
Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street, NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20036; 
telephone: 202-632-7003 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because the National Indian Gaming 
Commission is regularly associated with a variety of matters which have 
the potential for resulting in litigation, the National Indian Gaming 
Commission has a requirement for regulations describing the duties of 
its personnel with respect to such litigation. On July 1, 1999, the 
Commission proposed such regulations. Federal Register: July 15, 1999 
(Volume 64, Number 135) page 38164-38165. The Commission requested 
comments on those proposed regulations. Below is the Commission's 
analysis of the comments received during the comment period and the 
text of the final regulations.

General Comments

    A commenter pointed out that, although the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION published with the Proposed Rule had noted that the 
regulations were intended to be the Commission's ``Touhy regulations,'' 
and cited United States Ex. Rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951), 
the statutory basis for Touhy regulations, 5 U.S.C. 301, was omitted. 
The Final Rule corrects this oversight.
    Concern was expressed by a commenter that application of these 
rules to litigation in which the National Indian Gaming Commission is a 
party would be inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 
The Commission considers it self-evident that it may not relieve itself 
of its obligations as a litigant by promulgating a housekeeping 
regulation, and that there will be circumstances under which the 
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rather than these regulations will 
guide the actions of Commission personnel. Nonetheless, the Commission, 
like any public or private party to litigation, may protect itself 
against unauthorized disclosures of information, and, even when the 
Commission is a party to the proceeding, it has authority to prescribe 
regulations for the conduct of its employees relating to disclosure of 
information to the opposing party.
    Comment was received which referenced 25 U.S.C. 2716(a) and the 
Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905, and expressed the view that the 
regulation should address concerns of gaming tribes respecting 
protection of confidential information submitted to the National Indian 
Gaming Commission by such tribes. The comment suggested that the Final 
Rule should: (a) Restrict disclosure of such information in court, and 
(b) Require notification to tribes in the event third parties request 
such information.
    The Commission is issuing these regulations to guide the conduct of 
Commission personnel and former personnel with respect to requests or 
demands for information that are

[[Page 54542]]

litigation-related or otherwise arise out of judicial, administrative 
or other legal proceedings. The regulations do not, and under 5 U.S.C. 
301, could not, provide a substantive basis for limiting the 
availability of Commission records. In the context, however, of the 
decision of the Chairman or General Counsel to allow a person to whom 
the regulation applies to comply with a subpoena or other demand, the 
Commission agrees that the interests of the submitter in confidential 
material must be considered. See the discussion below of Section 516.2.

516.1 What does this part cover?

    One commenter noted that the phrase ``litigation-related,'' 
standing alone, made applicability of the proposed rule uncertain with 
respect to requests or demands such as those which might originate, for 
example, in state grand juries or licensing boards. The Commission 
agrees and has modified the language of this part to provide 
clarification.

516.2 When may a person to whom this part applies give testimony, make 
a statement or submit to interview?

    A commenter noted that the term ``public interest,'' the basis on 
which the Chairman or General Counsel determines whether to grant a 
request for a statement or testimony under this section, or for 
documents under section 516.3, is not defined.
    The Commission considers the term ``public interest'' to be 
sufficiently precise in this context. Depending upon the circumstances 
of the request, an official making the ``public interest'' 
determination might look at any number of factors, including such 
matters as: whether allowing the statement or testimony would serve the 
goals of the regulation; whether allowing the statement or testimony is 
necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice; and whether the 
Commission or the United States has any important interests which may 
be affected by the outcome of the legal proceeding. With respect to 
confidential commercial or proprietary information, the determination 
of the Chairman or General Counsel will also include consideration of 
the views of the submitter, consistent with the policy embodied in 
Executive Order 12600, June 23, 1987, and 25 CFR 517.5. Recognizing 
that, except when the Commission is a party to the litigation, the 
decision to deny a request for testimony or documents under this part 
may be subjected to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure 
Act, 5 U.S.C. 702, a clear articulation of the basis for such a 
determination will be made routinely.

516.3 When may a person to whom this part applies produce records?

    A comment identified a discrepancy between this section and section 
516.2 in that the two sections, as proposed, did not provide a parallel 
process for the determination to respond to a subpoena ad 
testificandum, on the one hand, and the determination to respond to a 
subpoena duces tecum, on the other. The Final Rule modifies this 
section to eliminate the discrepancy.

516.4 How are records certified or authenticated?

    Comment was received suggesting that certification as to the 
authenticity of copies be made mandatory by substituting the word 
``shall'' for the word ``may.''
    While accommodation of such requests will be the norm, the 
Commission prefers non-mandatory language, thereby allowing a flexible 
response in the event of receipt of a certification request which is 
unreasonable or unnecessarily burdensome.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
the Commission has determined that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Because this rule is procedural in nature, it will not impose 
substantive requirements that could be deemed impacts within the scope 
of the Act.

National Environmental Policy Act

    The Commission has determined that this rule does not constitute a 
major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment and that no detailed statement is required pursuant to the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 516

    Administrative practice and procedure, Gambling, Indians--Lands, 
Reporting and record keeping requirements.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Commission amends 25 
CFR chapter III by adding a new Part 516 to read as follows:

PART 516--TESTIMONY OF COMMISSIONERS AND EMPLOYEES AND FORMER 
COMMISSIONERS AND FORMER EMPLOYEES RESPECTING OFFICIAL DUTIES; 
RESPONSE TO SUBPOENA

Sec.

516.1 What is the purpose of this part and to whom does it apply?
516.2 When may a person to whom this part applies give testimony, 
make a statement or submit to interview?
516.3 When may a person to whom this part applies produce records?
516.4 How are records certified or authenticated?

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2706; 25 U.S.C. 2716(a); 18 
U.S.C. 1905.


Sec. 516.1  What is the purpose of this part and to whom does it apply?

    (a) The purpose of this part is to promulgate regulations regarding 
the release of official National Indian Gaming Commission information 
and provision of testimony by National Indian Gaming Commission 
personnel with respect to litigation or potential litigation and to 
prescribe conduct on the part of National Indian Gaming Commission 
personnel in response to a litigation-related request or demand.
    (b) This part applies to requests or demands that are litigation-
related or otherwise arise out of judicial, administrative or other 
legal proceedings (including subpoena, order or other demand) for 
interview, testimony (including by deposition) or other statement, or 
for production of documents relating to the business of the National 
Indian Gaming Commission, whether or not the National Indian Gaming 
Commission or the United States is a party to the litigation. It does 
not, however, apply to document requests covered by 25 CFR parts 515 
and 517.
    (c) To the extent the request or demand seeks official information 
or documents, the provisions of this part are applicable to 
Commissioners, employees, and former Commissioners and former 
employees, of the National Indian Gaming Commission.


Sec. 516.2  When may a person to whom this part applies give testimony, 
make a statement or submit to interview?

    (a) No person to whom this part applies, except as authorized by 
the Chairman or the General Counsel pursuant to this regulation, shall 
provide testimony, make a statement or submit to interview.
    (b) Whenever a subpoena commanding the giving of any testimony has 
been lawfully served upon a person to whom this part

[[Page 54543]]

applies, such individual shall, unless otherwise authorized by the 
Chairman or the General Counsel, appear in response thereto and 
respectfully decline to testify on the grounds that it is prohibited by 
this regulation.
    (c) A person who desires testimony or other statement from any 
person to whom this part applies may make written request therefor, 
verified by oath, directed to the Chairman setting forth his or her 
interest in the matter to be disclosed and designating the use to which 
such statement or testimony will be put in the event of compliance with 
such request: provided, that a written request therefor by an official 
of any federal, state or tribal entity, acting in his or her official 
capacity need not be verified by oath. If it is determined by the 
Chairman or the General Counsel that such statement or testimony will 
be in the public interest, the request may be granted. Where a request 
for a statement or testimony is granted, one or more persons to whom 
this part applies may be authorized or designated to appear and testify 
or give a statement with respect thereto.


Sec. 516.3  When may a person to whom this part applies produce 
records?

    (a) Any request for records of the National Indian Gaming 
Commission shall be handled pursuant to the procedures established in 
25 CFR parts 515 and 517 and shall comply with the rules governing 
public disclosure as provided in 25 CFR parts 515 and 517.
    (b) Whenever a subpoena duces tecum commanding the production of 
any record has been lawfully served upon a person to whom this part 
applies, such person shall forward the subpoena to the General Counsel. 
If commanded to appear in response to any such subpoena, a person to 
whom this part applies shall respectfully decline to produce the record 
on the ground that production is prohibited by this part and state that 
the production of the record(s) of the National Indian Gaming 
Commission is a matter to be determined by the Chairman or the General 
Counsel.


Sec. 516.4  How are records certified or authenticated?

    (a) Upon request, the person having custody and responsibility for 
maintenance of records which are to be released under this part or 25 
CFR parts 515 or 517 may certify the authenticity of copies of records 
that are requested to be provided in such format.
    (b) A request for certified copies of records or for authentication 
of copies of records shall be sent to the National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005, 
Attention: Freedom of Information Act Officer.

Authority and Signature

    This proposed rule was prepared under the direction of the 
Commissioners, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L St. NW, Suite 
9100, Washington DC 20005.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of September, 1999.
Montie R. Deer,
Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-25747 Filed 10-6-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P