[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52398-52421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-25155]



[[Page 52397]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part III





Department of the Interior





_______________________________________________________________________



Fish and Wildlife Service



_______________________________________________________________________



50 CFR Part 20



Migratory Bird Hunting; Late Seasons and Bag and Possession Limits for 
Certain Migratory Game Birds; Final Rule

  Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 1999 / 
Rules and Regulations  

[[Page 52398]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AF24


Migratory Bird Hunting; Late Seasons and Bag and Possession 
Limits for Certain Migratory Game Birds

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule prescribes the hunting seasons, hours, areas, and 
daily bag and possession limits for general waterfowl seasons and those 
early seasons for which States previously deferred selection. Taking of 
migratory birds is prohibited unless specifically provided for by 
annual regulations. This rule permits the taking of designated species 
during the 1999-2000 season.

DATE: This rule takes effect on October 1, 1999.

ADDRESSES: You may inspect comments during normal business hours in 
room 634, Arlington Square Building, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, 
Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Andrew, Chief, or Ron W. 
Kokel, Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, (703) 358-1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulations Schedule for 1999

    On May 3, 1999, we published in the Federal Register (64 FR 23742) 
a proposal to amend 50 CFR part 20. The proposal dealt with the 
establishment of seasons, limits, and other regulations for migratory 
game birds under Sec. 20.101 through 20.107, 20.109, and 20.110 of 
subpart K. On June 17, we published in the Federal Register (64 FR 
32758) a second document providing supplemental proposals for early- 
and late-season migratory bird hunting regulations frameworks and the 
proposed regulatory alternatives for the 1999-2000 duck hunting season. 
The June 17 supplement also provided detailed information on the 1999-
2000 regulatory schedule and announced the Service Migratory Bird 
Regulations Committee and Flyway Council meetings.
    On June 22-23, we held meetings that reviewed information on the 
current status of migratory shore and upland game birds and developed 
1999-2000 migratory game bird regulations recommendations for these 
species plus regulations for migratory game birds in Alaska, Puerto 
Rico, and the Virgin Islands; special September waterfowl seasons in 
designated States; special sea duck seasons in the Atlantic Flyway; and 
extended falconry seasons. In addition, we reviewed and discussed 
preliminary information on the status of waterfowl as it relates to the 
development and selection of the regulatory packages for the 1999-2000 
regular waterfowl seasons. On July 22, we published in the Federal 
Register (64 FR 39460) a third document specifically dealing with the 
proposed frameworks for early-season regulations for the 1999-2000 duck 
hunting season. The July 22 supplement also established the final 
regulatory alternatives for the 1999-2000 duck hunting season.
    On August 3-4, 1999, we held meetings, as announced in the May 3 
and June 17 Federal Registers, to review the status of waterfowl. On 
August 27, 1999, we published a fourth document (64 FR 47048) which 
dealt specifically with proposed frameworks for the 1999-2000 late-
season migratory bird hunting regulations. On August 27, 1999, we also 
published a fifth document (64 FR 47072) containing final frameworks 
for early migratory bird hunting seasons from which wildlife 
conservation agency officials from the States, Puerto Rico, and the 
Virgin Islands selected early-season hunting dates, hours, areas, and 
limits for the 1999-2000 season. On August 31, 1999, we published in 
the Federal Register (64 FR 47418) a sixth document consisting of a 
final rule amending subpart K of title 50 CFR part 20 to set hunting 
seasons, hours, areas, and limits for early seasons. We published final 
late-season frameworks for migratory game bird hunting regulations, 
from which State wildlife conservation agency officials selected late-
season hunting dates, hours, areas, and limits for 1999-2000 in a 
seventh document in the September 27, 1999, Federal Register.
    The final rule described here is the eighth and final in the series 
of proposed, supplemental, and final rulemaking documents for migratory 
game bird hunting regulations for 1999-2000 and deals specifically with 
amending subpart K of 50 CFR part 20 to set hunting seasons, hours, 
areas, and limits for species subject to late-season regulations and 
those for early seasons that States previously deferred.

NEPA Consideration

    NEPA considerations are covered by the programmatic document, 
``Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Issuance of Annual 
Regulations Permitting the Sport Hunting of Migratory Birds (FSES 88-
14),'' filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on June 9, 1988. 
We published a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register on June 
16, 1988 (53 FR 22582). We published our Record of Decision on August 
18, 1988 (53 FR 31341). Copies are available from the address indicated 
under the caption ADDRESSES.

Endangered Species Act Considerations

    As in the past, we design hunting regulations to remove or 
alleviate chances of conflict between migratory game bird hunting 
seasons and the protection and conservation of endangered and 
threatened species. We conducted consultations to ensure that actions 
resulting from these regulatory proposals will not likely jeopardize 
the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result 
in the destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat. 
Findings from these consultations are included in a biological opinion 
and may have caused modification of some regulatory measures previously 
proposed. Final frameworks reflect any modifications. The biological 
opinions resulting from Section 7 consultation are public documents 
available for inspection in either the Service's Division of Endangered 
Species or MBMO, at the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES.

Executive Order (E.O.) 12866

    Collectively, the rules covering the overall frameworks for 
migratory bird hunting are economically significant and have been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under E.O. 12866. 
This rule is a small portion of the overall migratory bird hunting 
frameworks and was not individually submitted and reviewed by OMB under 
E.O. 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    These regulations have a significant economic impact on substantial 
numbers of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). We analyzed the economic impacts of the annual 
hunting regulations on small business entities in detail and issued a 
Small Entity Flexibility Analysis (Analysis) in 1998. The Analysis 
documented the significant beneficial economic effect. The primary 
source of information about hunter expenditures for migratory game bird 
hunting is the National Hunting and Fishing Survey, which is conducted 
at 5-year intervals. The Analysis was based on the 1996 National 
Hunting and Fishing Survey and the U.S. Department of Commerce's County 
Business Patterns from which it

[[Page 52399]]

was estimated that migratory bird hunters would spend between $429 and 
$1,084 million at small businesses in 1998. Copies of the Analysis are 
available upon request.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This rule is a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. For the reasons outlined above, 
this rule has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. 
However, because this rule establishes hunting seasons, we do not plan 
to defer the effective date under the exemption contained in 5 U.S.C. 
808(1).

Paperwork Reduction Act

    We examined these regulations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. We utilize the various recordkeeping and reporting requirements 
imposed under regulations established in 50 CFR Part 20, Subpart K, in 
the formulation of migratory game bird hunting regulations. 
Specifically, OMB has approved the information collection requirements 
of the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program and assigned 
clearance number 1018-0015 (expires 09/30/2001). This information is 
used to provide a sampling frame for voluntary national surveys to 
improve our harvest estimates for all migratory game birds in order to 
better manage these populations.
    A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    We have determined and certify in compliance with the requirements 
of the Unfunded Mandates Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this 
rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given 
year on local or State government or private entities.

Civil Justice Reform--Executive Order 12988

    The Department, in promulgating this rule, has determined that 
these regulations meet the applicable standards provided in Sections 
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.

Takings Implication Assessment

    In accordance with Executive Order 12630, these rules, authorized 
by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, do not have significant takings 
implications and do not affect any constitutionally protected property 
rights. These rules will not result in the physical occupancy of 
property, the physical invasion of property, or the regulatory taking 
of any property. In fact, these rules allow hunters to exercise 
privileges that would be otherwise unavailable; and, therefore, reduce 
restrictions on the use of private and public property.

Federalism Effects

    Due to the migratory nature of certain species of birds, the 
Federal government has been given responsibility over these species by 
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually prescribe frameworks from 
which the States make selections and employs guidelines to establish 
special regulations on Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands. 
This process preserves the ability of the States and Tribes to 
determine which seasons meet their individual needs. Any State or Tribe 
may be more restrictive than the Federal frameworks at any time. The 
frameworks are developed in a cooperative process with the States and 
the Flyway Councils. This allows States to participate in the 
development of frameworks from which they will make selections, thereby 
having an influence on their own regulation. These rules do not have a 
substantial direct effect on fiscal capacity, change the roles or 
responsibilities of Federal or State governments, or intrude on State 
policy or administration. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 
12612, these regulations do not have significant federalism effects and 
do not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes

    In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994, 
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American tribal 
Governments'' (59 FR 22951) and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated possible 
effects on Federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined that 
there are no effects.

Regulations Promulgation

    The rulemaking process for migratory game bird hunting must, by its 
nature, operate under severe time constraints. However, we intend that 
the public be given the greatest possible opportunity to comment on the 
regulations. Thus, when the preliminary proposed rulemaking was 
published, we established what we believed were the longest periods 
possible for public comment. In doing this, we recognized that when the 
comment period closed, time would be of the essence. That is, if there 
were a delay in the effective date of these regulations after this 
final rulemaking, the States would have insufficient time to implement 
their selected season dates and limits and start their seasons in a 
timely manner.
    We therefore find that ``good cause'' exists, within the terms of 5 
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, and these 
regulations will, therefore, take effect immediately upon publication. 
Accordingly, with each conservation agency having had an opportunity to 
participate in selecting the hunting seasons desired for its State or 
Territory on those species of migratory birds for which open seasons 
are now prescribed, and consideration having been given to all other 
relevant matters presented, certain sections of title 50, chapter I, 
subchapter B, part 20, subpart K, are hereby amended as set forth 
below.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20

    Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.

    Dated: September 15, 1999.
Donald J. Barry
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.

PART 20--[AMENDED]

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Service amends title 
50, chapter I, subchapter B, part 20, subpart K as follows:
    1. The authority citation for part 20 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712; and 16 U.S.C. 742 a-j.

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P

[[Page 52400]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.018



[[Page 52401]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.019



[[Page 52402]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.020



[[Page 52403]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.021



[[Page 52404]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.022



[[Page 52405]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.023



[[Page 52406]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.024



[[Page 52407]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.025



[[Page 52408]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.026



[[Page 52409]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.027



[[Page 52410]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.028



[[Page 52411]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.029



[[Page 52412]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.030



[[Page 52413]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.031



[[Page 52414]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.032



[[Page 52415]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.033



[[Page 52416]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.034



[[Page 52417]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.035



[[Page 52418]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.036



[[Page 52419]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.037



[[Page 52420]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.038



[[Page 52421]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28SE99.039



[FR Doc. 99-25155 Filed 9-27-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-C