[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 170 (Thursday, September 2, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48099-48103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-22627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL-6431-2]


Louisiana: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Immediate final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Louisiana has applied for final authorization to 
revise its Hazardous Waste Program under the Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA has determined that these changes satisfy 
all requirements needed to qualify for final authorization. The EPA 
reviewed Louisiana's application, and now makes an immediate final 
decision, subject to receipt of adverse written comment, that 
Louisiana's Hazardous Waste Program revision satisfies all of the 
requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. 
Consequently, EPA intends to grant Louisiana final authorization for 
the program modifications contained in the revision.

DATES: This action is effective on November 1, 1999 without further 
notice, unless the EPA receives relevant adverse comments by October 4, 
1999. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely 
withdrawal of the immediate final rule or identify the issues raised, 
respond to the comments, and affirm that the immediate final rule will 
take effect as scheduled.

ADDRESSES: Mail written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, Grants and Authorization Section (6PD-G), 
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, at the address shown 
below. You can examine copies of the materials submitted by the State 
of Louisiana during normal business hours at the following locations: 
EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202-2733, (214) 665-
8533: or Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, H.B. Garlock 
Building, 7290 Bluebonnet, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70810,(504) 765-0617.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. What Is Resource Conservation and Recovery Act State 
Authorization?

    RCRA, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 
1984 (HSWA), provides for authorization of State hazardous waste 
programs under subtitle C. Under RCRA section 3006, EPA may authorize a 
State to administer and enforce the RCRA hazardous waste program. See 
40 CFR part 271. In fact, Congress designed RCRA so that the entire 
subtitle C program would eventually be administered by the States in 
lieu of the Federal Government. This is because the States are closer 
to, and more familiar with, the regulated community and therefore are 
in a better position to administer the programs and respond to local 
needs effectively.
    After receiving authorization, the State administers the program in 
lieu of the Federal government, although EPA retains enforcement 
authority under RCRA sections 3008, 3013, and 7003. Authorized States 
must revise their programs when EPA promulgates Federal Standards that 
are more stringent or broader in scope than existing federal standards. 
States are not required to modify their programs when Federal changes 
that are less stringent than the existing Federal program or when 
changes reduce the scope of the existing Federal program. These changes 
are optional and are noted as such in the Federal Register (FR) 
documents. However, EPA encourages States to adopt optional rules 
because they provide benefit to environmental protection.

B. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?

    States that receives final authorization from EPA under RCRA 
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste 
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent 
than the Federal Hazardous Waste Program. As the Federal program 
changes, States must change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the 
changes. Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or 
State statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain 
other changes occur. Most commonly, States must change their programs 
because of changes to EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260-266, 268, 270, 273, and 279.

What Is the Effect of This Authorization?

    This authorization should not have little impact because the 
State's requirements are already effective. However, upon approval of 
the revisions, Louisiana will have authority to regulate the rules 
pertaining to RCRA Cluster VII. Currently, the EPA regulates this 
waste. Louisiana will have authority to issue permits in RCRA Cluster 
VII rules and to ensure that all permits issued to hazardous waste 
facilities protect of human health and the environment.

D. What Is the History of Louisiana's Final Authorization and Its 
Revisions?

    The State of Louisiana initially received final authorization on 
February 7, 1985 (50 FR 3348), to implement its

[[Page 48100]]

base Hazardous Waste Management program. Louisiana received 
authorization for revisions to its program on January 29, 1990 (54 FR 
48889), October 25, 1991 (56 FR 41958), and technical corrections at 
(56 FR 51762), effective January 23, 1995 and another technical 
corrections was made at (59 FR 55368-55371), (60 FR 18360), March 8, 
1995. We authorized the additional following revisions: (59 FR 66200), 
October 17, 1995, (60 FR 53707) effective January 2, 1996, March 28, 
(61 FR 13777-13782) effective June 11, 1996, December 29, 1997, (62 FR 
67572-67577) effective March 16, 1998 and October 23, 1998 (63 FR 
56830-56891) effective December 22, 1998, August 25, 1999 (64 FR 46302-
46333), effective October 25, 1999. On January 26, 1999, Louisiana 
applied for approval of its complete final program. In this 
application, Louisiana is seeking additional approval of its program 
revision in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21(b)(3).
    In 1983, the Louisiana legislature adopted Act 97, which amended 
and reenacted Louisiana Revised Statutes 30:1051 et seq., the 
Environmental Affairs Act. This Act created the LDEQ, which has lead 
agency jurisdictional authority for administering the RCRA Subtitle C 
program in the State. Also, LDEQ is designated to facilitate 
communication between EPA and the State. The State of Louisiana has 
adopted the Federal regulations in cluster VII promulgated from July 1, 
1996, through June 30, 1997; the State of Louisiana regulations became 
effective September 20, 1998.

E. What Revisions Are We Approving With Today's Action?

    The State of Louisiana submitted a final complete program revision 
application, seeking authorization of their revisions in accordance 
with 40 CFR 271.21. Louisiana's revisions consist of regulations which 
specifically govern's RCRA cluster VII rules. Louisiana requirements 
appear on the chart included in this document. The EPA is now making a 
final decision, subject to receipt of written comments that oppose this 
action, that Louisiana's hazardous waste program revision satisfies all 
of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. 
Therefore, we grant Louisiana final authorization for the following 
program revisions:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Federal Citation                       State Analog
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Criteria for                Louisiana Revised States (LRS) 30:Sec.
 Classification of Solid        2180 et seq., as amended June 14, 1991,
 Waste Disposal Facilities      effective June 14, 1991; Louisiana
 and Practices;                 Hazardous Waste Regulations (LHWR) Secs.
 Identification and Listing     3911, as amended October 20, 1994,
 of Hazardous Waste;            effective October 20, 1994; 3915.B,
 Requirements for               3915.B.1-3, 3915.B.4, 3915.B.4.a-b,
 Authorization of State         3915.B.5, as amended September 20, 1998;
 Hazardous Waste Programs,      effective September 20, 1998, 301.B.1,
 [61 FR 34252] July 1, 1996.    as amended April 20, 1996, effective
 (Checklist 153).               April 20, 1996; 315.N, as amended
                                September 20, 1997, effective September
                                20, 1997; and 521.H, as amended
                                September 20, 1993, effective September
                                20, 1993. LAC 33:V.3913 and LAC
                                33:V.3915.B are more stringent than the
                                40 CFR 261.5(f)-(g). The State does not
                                recognize the class of generators
                                generating 0-100 kilogram per month as
                                ``conditionally exempt small quantity
                                generators''. Generators in Louisiana
                                who generate 0-100 kg/mth must follow
                                more stringent guidelines, such as
                                filing annual reports for small quantity
                                generators.
                               The State regulations are more stringent
                                because generators who generate more
                                than 1 kg acutely hazardous waste are
                                subject to full regulations. LAC
                                33:VII.301.B.1, LAC 33:VII.315.N. and
                                LAC 33:VII.521.H) is more stringent than
                                40 CFR 261.5(f)(3)(iv)(v) and (g)(3)(iv)-
                                (v) because solid waste landfills are
                                prohibited from accepting hazardous
                                waste, with the exception of household
                                hazardous waste.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Land Disposal Restrictions  LRS 30:2180 et seq., as amended June 14,
 Phase III--Emergency           1991, effective June 14, 1991; LHWR
 Extension of the K088          Secs.  109 Excluded Scrap Metal, 109.
 Capacity Variance, [62 FR      Processed Scrap Metal, 109. Home Scrap
 1992] January 14, 1997.        Metal, 109. Prompt Scrap Metal, 109.
 (Checklist 155).               Table 1, 105.D.1.m-n, 105.D.1.n.i-ii,
                                4105.B.4, 2201.l-l.2, 2201.l.3,
                                2237.A.2.d, 2237.A.4, 2245.A, 2245.A,
                                2245.B.1-6, 2245.B, 2245.C.1.a-d,
                                2245.C.2, 2245.C, 2245.C.1.a,
                                2245.C.1.b, 2245.D.3-7, 2245.D, 2245.E,
                                2245.E.1-3, 2245.F, 2245.G, 2245.H,
                                2245.L, 2245.L.1-3, 2747.A, 2247.A.1-2,
                                2247.B, 2247.B.1-2, 2247.B.2.a-e,
                                2247.C, 2247.C.1-3, 2247.D-E, 2247.F.1-
                                2, 2246.A, 2246.D.1.b, 2209.A, 2209.A.1-
                                3, 2209.B-D, 2209.D.2-3, 2209.D.1,
                                2209.D.4, 2209.E, 2213-2219, Chapter 22
                                Tables 2-3, 2231.L, Chapter 22. Table 10
                                and Chapter 22 Tables 5 and 11, as
                                amended September 20, 1998, effective
                                September 20, 1998. The State has no
                                equivalent citation to 40 CFR
                                268.1(e)(1). The State does not
                                recognize the class of generators
                                generating 0=100 kg/mth as
                                ``conditionally small quantity
                                generators (SQGs)'' Generators in
                                Louisiana who generate 0-100 kg/mth must
                                follow more stringent guidelines for
                                SQGs). LAC 33:V.2237.A.4 is more
                                stringent than 40 CFR 268.4(a)(4)
                                because Louisiana specifies that the
                                owner or operator must submit to the
                                administrative authority a written
                                certification. There is not an
                                equivalent citation to 40 CFR
                                268.7(a)(10). In this case the State
                                does not offer the relief to SQG and
                                thus the State is more stringent.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Military Munition Rule:     LRS 30:2180 et seq., as amended June 14,
 Hazardous Waste                1991, effective June 14, 1991; LHWR
 Identification and             Secs.  109, 109. Active Range, 109.
 Management; Explosive          Administrative Authority, 109. Chemical
 emergencies; Manifest          Agents and Munitions, 109. Explosives or
 Exemption for Transport of     Emergency, Response Specialist, 109.
 Hazardous Waste on Right-of-   Inactive Range, 109. Military, 109.
 Ways on Contiguous             Military Munitions, 109. Military Range,
 Properties, [62 FR 6622]       109. Unexploded Ordnance (UXO), 109.
 February 12, 1997.             Solid Waste.1.b.iii-iv, 305.C.12-13,
 (Checklist 156).               321.C.8, 321.C.8.a-c, 321.C.9, 1101,
                                1107A.11, 1301.G, 1301.H, 1501.C.7.a.iv,
                                1501.C.7.d, 1501.C.12, 901, 2401,
                                2403.A, 2403.A.1-5, 2403.B, 2403.B.1,
                                2403.B.1.a-b, 2403.B.1.b.1-iii,
                                2403.B.1.c, 2403.B.2-3, 2403.C-F, 2405.A-
                                B, 4307, 4351, 4707, 4709.A, 4709.A.1-5,
                                4709.B, 4709.B.1, 4709.B.1.a-b,
                                4709.B.b.1-iii, 4709.B.1.c, 4709.B.2-3,
                                4709.C-F, 4711.A-B, 5301.A-B, 5303.A,
                                5303.A.1, 5303.A.1.a-c, 5303.A.2,
                                5303.B, 5303.B.1-4, 5303.C, 5303.C.1-2,
                                5303.D, 5305.A, 5305.A.1, 5305.A.l.a-c,
                                5305.A.2-4, 5305.B-C, 5307, 5309,
                                5309.A.1, 5309.A.1.a-g, 5309.A.2-3,
                                5309.B-D, 5309.D.1-2, 5309.E, 5311,
                                305.C.13.d, 305.C.15, as amended
                                September 20, 1998, effective September
                                20, 1998.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 48101]]

 
4. Land Disposal               LRS 30:2180 et seq., as amended June 14,
 Restrictions--Phase IV:        1991, effective June 14, 1991; LHWR
 Treatment Standards for Wood   Secs.  109. Excluded Scrap Metal, 109.
 Preserving Waste, Paperwork    Processed Scrap Metal, 109. Home Scrap
 Reduction and Streamlining,    Metal, 109. Prompt Scrap Metal, 109.
 Exemptions From RCRA for       Table 1, 105.D.1.m-n, 105.D.1.n.i-ii,
 Certain Processed Materials;   4105.B.4, 2201.l.l-2, 2201.l.3,
 and Miscellaneous Hazardous    2237.A.2.d, 2237.A.4, 2245.A, 2245.B.1-
 Waste Provisions, [62 FR       6, 2246.B, 2245.C.1.a-d, 2245.C.2,
 25998] May 12, 1997.           2245.C, 2245.C.1.a-b, 2245.D.3-7,
 (Checklist 157).               2245.D, 2245.E, 2245.E.1-4, 2245.F-H,
                                2245.l, 2245.l.1, 2245.l.2-3, 2245.l.3,
                                2747.A, 2247.A.1-2, 2247.B, 2247.B.1-2,
                                2247.B.a-e, 2247.C, 2247.C.1-3, 2247.D,
                                2247.E, 2247.F.1-2, 2246.A, 2246.D.1.b,
                                2209.A, 2209.A.1-3, 2209.B-D, 2209.D.2-
                                3, 2209.D.1, 2209.D.4, 2209.E, 2213-
                                2219, Chapter 22. Table 2, Chapter 22.
                                Table 3, 2231.L, Chapter 22. Table 10, 5
                                and 11, as amended September 20, 1998,
                                effective September 20, 1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Hazardous Waste Management  LRS 30:2180 et seq., as amended June 14,
 System; Testing and            1991, effective June 14, 1991; LHWR
 Monitoring Activities, [62     Secs.  110.A, 110.A.1-10, as amended
 FR 32452] June 13, 1997.       April 20, 1998, effective April 20,
 (Checklist 158).               1998; 110.A.11, as amended September 20,
                                1998, effective September 20, 1998,
                                110.A.12-15, as amended April 20, 1998,
                                effective April 20, 1998, 1711.D.1.c,
                                1711.F, 1741.D.2, Chapter 33. Table 4,
                                4557, 4587, 3009.E.1, 3013.G.1-2,
                                3015.F, as amended September 20, 1998,
                                effective September 20, 1998; and
                                Chapter 30. Appendix I, as amended
                                December 20, 1992, effective December
                                20, 1992
------------------------------------------------------------------------

F. What Decisions Has the EPA Made?

    We conclude that Louisiana's application for program revision meets 
all of the statutory and regulatory requirements established by RCRA. 
Accordingly, we grant Louisiana final authorization to operate its 
hazardous waste program as revised, assuming we receive no adverse 
comments as discussed above. Upon effective final approval Louisiana 
will be responsible for permitting treatment, storage, and disposal 
facilities within its borders and for carrying out the aspects of the 
RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject to 
the limitations of the HSWA. Louisiana also will have primary 
enforcement responsibilities, although EPA retains the right to conduct 
inspections under section 3007 of RCRA, and to take enforcement actions 
under sections 3008, 3013, and 7003 of RCRA.

G. How Do the Revised State Rules Differ From the Federal Rules?

    EPA considers the following State requirements to be more stringent 
than the Federal: The State has no equivalent citation to 40 CFR 
268.1(e)(1). The State does not recognize the class of generators 
generating 0-100kg/mth as ``conditionally exempt small quantity 
generators''. Generators in Louisiana who generates 0-100kg/mth must 
follow more stringent guidelines for small quantity generators. LAC 
33:V.2237.A.4 is more stringent than the 40 CFR 266.4(a)(4) because 
Louisiana specify that the owner or operator must submit to the 
administrative authority a written certification. There is no 
equivalent citation to 40 CFR 268.7(a)(10) because the State of 
Louisiana does not offer the relief to small quantity generators. LAC 
33:VII.301.B.1, LAC 33:VII.315.N, and LAC 33:VII.521.H is more 
stringent than the 40 CFR 261.5(f)(3)(iv)(v) and (g)(3)(iv)-(v) because 
solid waste landfills are prohibited from accepting hazardous waste, 
with the exception of household hazardous waste. These requirements are 
part of Louisiana's authorized program and are federally enforceable. 
In this authorization of the State of Louisiana's program revisions for 
RCRA cluster VII, there are no provisions that are broader in scope. 
Broader in scope requirements are not part of the authorized program 
and EPA can not enforce them.

H. Who Handles Permits After This Authorization Takes Effect?

    Louisiana will issue permits for all the provisions for which it 
has authority and will administer the permits it issues.
    EPA will continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or 
portions of permits which it issued before the effective date of this 
authorization until they expire or are terminated. EPA will not issue 
any more permits or portions of permits for the provisions listed in 
this document after the effective date of this authorization. EPA will 
continue to implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which 
the State is not yet authorized.

I. Why Wasn't There a Proposed Rule Before Today's Notice?

    EPA is authorizing the State's changes through this immediate final 
action and is publishing this rule without a prior proposal to 
authorize the changes because EPA believes it is not controversial and 
we expect no comments that oppose this action. EPA is providing an 
opportunity for public comment now. In the proposed rules section of 
today's Federal Register we are publishing a separate document that 
proposes to authorize the State changes. If EPA receives comments which 
oppose this authorization, that document will serve as a proposal to 
authorize the changes.

J. Where Do I Send My Comments and When Are They Due?

    You should send written comments to Alima Patterson, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, Grants and Authorization Section (6PD-G), 
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, (214) 665-8533. Please refer to 
Docket Number LA-99-2. We must receive your comments by October 4, 
1999. You may not have an opportunity to comment again. If you want to 
comment on this action, you must do so at this time.

K. What Happens if EPA Receives Comments Opposing This Action?

    If EPA receives comments opposing this authorization, a second 
Federal Register document will be published before the immediate final 
rule takes effect. The second document may withdraw the immediate final 
rule or identify the issues raised, respond to the comments, and affirm 
that the immediate final rule will take effect as scheduled.

L. When Will This Approval Take Effect?

    Unless EPA receives comments opposing this action, this final 
authorization approval will become effective without further notice on 
November 1, 1999.

M. Where Can I Review the State's Application?

    You can view and copy the State of Louisiana's application from 
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday through Friday at the following addresses: 
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, H.B. Garlock Building, 
7290 Bluebonnet, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70810, (504) 765-0617 and EPA, 
Region

[[Page 48102]]

6 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, (214) 665-6444. For 
further information contact Alima Patterson, Region 6 Authorization 
Coordinator, Grants and Authorization Section (6PD-G), Multimedia 
Planning and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, (214) 665-8533.

N. Now Does Today's Action Affect Indian Country in Louisiana?

    Louisiana is not authorized to carry out its hazardous waste 
program in Indian country within the State. This authority remains with 
EPA. Therefore, this action has no effect Indian country.

O. What Is Codification?

    Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and 
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste 
program into the CFR. The EPA does this by referencing the authorized 
State rules in 40 CFR part 272. The EPA reserves the amendment of 40 
CFR part 272, subpart T for this authorization of Louisiana's program 
changes until a later date.

Regulatory Requirements

Compliance With Executive Order (E.O.) 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this rule 
from the requirements of section 3 of E.O. 12866.

Compliance Executive Order 13045

    Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' applies to any rule that: (1) The OMB 
determines is ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O. 12866; 
and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that the EPA 
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. 
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate 
the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on 
children and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other 
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered 
by the Agency.
    This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it is not an 
economically significant rule as defined by E.O. 12866, and because it 
does not involve decisions based on environmental health or safety 
risks.

National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its 
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards 
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, 
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or 
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs the 
EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency 
decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus 
standards.
    This action does not involved technical standards. Therefore, the 
EPA did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local and tribal 
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 and 205 of the 
UMRA, the EPA must prepare a written statement of economic and 
regulatory alternatives analyses for proposed and final rules with 
Federal mandates, as defined by the UMRA, that may result in 
expenditures to State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. The 
EPA has determined that section 202 and 205 requirements do not apply 
to today's action because this rule does not contain a Federal mandate 
that may result in annual expenditures of $100 million or more for 
State, local, and/or tribal governments in the aggregate, or the 
private sector. Costs to State, local and/or tribal governments already 
exist under the State of Louisiana's program, and today's action does 
not impose any additional obligations on regulated entities. In fact, 
the EPA's approval of State programs generally may reduce, not 
increase, compliance costs for the private sector. Further, as it 
applies to the State, this action does not impose a Federal 
intergovernmental mandate because UMRA does not include duties arising 
from participation in a voluntary Federal program.
    The requirements of section 203 of UMRA also do not apply to 
today's action. Before the EPA establishes any regulatory requirements 
that may significantly or uniquely affect small governments, including 
tribal governments, section 203 of the UMRA requires the EPA to develop 
a small government agency plan. This rule contains no regulatory 
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments. Although small governments may be hazardous waste 
generators, transporters, or own and/or operate hazardous waste 
treatments, storage or disposal facilities (TSDFs), they are already 
subject to the regulatory requirements under the existing State laws 
that are being authorized by the EPA, and thus, are not subject to any 
additional significant or unique requirements by virtue of this program 
approval.

Certification Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
1966), whenever an agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking 
for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for 
public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the 
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small 
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions). This analysis is 
unnecessary, however, if any agency's administrator certifies that the 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.
    The EPA has determined that this authorization will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Such small entities which are hazardous waste generators, transporters, 
or which own and/or operate TSDFs are already subject to the regulatory 
requirements under the existing State laws that are now being 
authorized by EPA. The EPA's authorization does not impose any 
significant additional burdens on these small entities. This is because 
EPA's authorization would simply result in an administrative change, 
rather than a change in the substantive requirements imposed on these 
small entities.
    Pursuant to the provision at 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Agency hereby 
certifies that this authorization will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This authorization 
approves regulatory requirements under existing State law to which 
small entities are already subject. It does not impose any new burdens 
on small entities. This rule therefore, does not require a regulatory 
flexibility analysis.

Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement

[[Page 48103]]

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take 
effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, 
which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to 
the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA submitted a 
report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. 
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General 
of the United States prior to publication of the rule in today's 
Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

Paperwork Reduction Act

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Federal 
agencies must consider the paperwork burden imposed by any information 
request contained in a proposed rule or a final rule. This rule will 
not impose any information requirements upon the regulated community.

Executive Order 12875 Enhancing Intergovernmental Partnerships

    Under E.O. 12875, the EPA may not issue regulation that is not 
required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local or 
tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds 
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those 
governments. If the mandate is unfunded, the EPA must provide to the 
OMB a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with 
representatives of affected State, local and tribal governments, the 
nature of their concerns, copies of any written communications from the 
governments, and a statement supporting the need to issue the 
regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875 requires the EPA to develop an 
effective process permitting elected officials and other 
representatives of State, local and tribal governments to provide 
meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals 
containing significant unfunded mandates.
    This rule does not create a mandate on State, local or tribal 
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these 
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 
do not apply to this rule.

Executive Order 13084 Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments

    Under E.O. 13084, the EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the 
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
cost incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is unfunded, 
the EPA must provide to the OMB, in a separately identified section of 
the preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of the EPA's 
prior consultation with representatives of affected tribal governments, 
a summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting 
the need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 13084 requires the 
EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected and other 
representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful 
and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters 
that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.
    This rule is not subject to E.O. 13084 because it does not 
significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian governments. 
The State of Louisiana is not authorized to implement the RCRA 
hazardous waste program in Indian country. This action has no effect on 
the hazardous waste program that the EPA implements in the Indian 
country within the State.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Confidential business information, Hazardous materials transportation, 
Hazardous waste, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control, 
Water supply.

Authority

    This document is issued under the authority of sections 2002(a), 
3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. 
6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).

    Dated: June 15, 1999.
Jerry Clifford,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 99-22627 Filed 9-1-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P