[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 117 (Friday, June 18, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Page 32858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-15563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6243-8]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared May 24, 1999 through May 28, 
1999 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National 
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA 
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 
564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 09, 1999 (64 
FR 17362).

Draft EISs

    ERP No. D-USN-K11097-GU Rating LO, Agana Naval Air Station Disposal 
and Reuse, Implementation, Guam.
    Summary: EPA expressed a lack of objection to the project.
    ERP No. D-USN-K11098-CA Rating EC2, Alameda Naval Air Station and 
Fleet and Industrial Supply Center, Disposal and Reuse, Alameda Annex 
and Facility, City of Alameda and Alameda County, CA.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns, because the 
Environmental Impact Report and the DEIS were prepared as separate 
documents with potentially different mitigation proposals, and due to 
specific concerns with hazardous materials and wastes.

Final EISs

    ERP No. F-AFS-J65291-MT Ash and Iron Mountain Grazing Permit 
Reissuance, Allotment Gallatin National Forest, Park County, MT.
    Summary: EPA review did not identify any potential environmental 
impacts requiring substantive changes in the proposal, therefore EPA 
has no objection to the action.
    ERP No. F-DOE-K08022-AZ Griffith Energy Project, Construction and 
Operation, 520-Megawatt (MW) Natural Gas-Fired and Combined Cycle Power 
Plant, Right-of-Way Grant, Operating Permit and COE Section 404 Permit, 
Kingman, AZ.
    Summary: EPA's previous objections have been resolved, therefore 
EPA has no objection to the action as proposed.
    ERP No. F-FTA-J40143-UT University-Downtown-Airport Transportation 
Corridor, Major Investment Study, Construction and Operation of the 
East-West Corridor Light Rail Transit (LRT), Transportation System 
Management (TSM) and Central Business District (CBD), Funding, Salt 
Lake County, UT.
    Summary: EPA's review has not identified any potential impacts, 
when combined with proposed mitigation measures, that require 
substantive changes to implementation of preferred alternative.
    ERP No. FB-COE-K36009-CA Napa River and Napa Creek Flood Protection 
Project, New and Refined Information, City of Napa, Napa County, CA.
    Summary: Review of the Final EIS has been completed and the project 
found to be satisfactory. No formal comment letter was sent to the 
preparing agency.

    Dated: June 15, 1999.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 99-15563 Filed 6-17-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U