[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29235-29240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-13379]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[NM-9-1-5214a; FRL-6350-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of New 
Mexico and County of Bernalillo, New Mexico; State Boards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action approves the State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revisions for Board composition and conflict of interest disclosure 
requirements submitted both by the State of New Mexico and by 
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, NM. The SIP revisions were submitted by 
the County and the State to satisfy the Federal mandate, found in 
section 128 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act), and in response to 
a SIP call letter to the Governor of New Mexico dated July 19, 1989, 
requiring a cure to identified SIP deficiencies concerning State 
Boards.
    The revisions were submitted by the Governor to EPA on April 20 and 
July 16, 1990, for the State portion, and on November 16, 1990, for the 
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County portion. Supplemental information was 
submitted for Albuquerque/Bernalillo County on December 18, 1990, 
October 21, 1991, and November 22, 1991. These revisions correct 
deficiencies for the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board (NMEIB) 
and the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Air Quality Board in order to 
comply with section 128 of the Act. The EPA approval of these New 
Mexico SIP revisions make the revisions federally enforceable. 
Subsequent correspondence in February and March 1993 addressed 
eligibility for ``public interest'' Board member positions.

DATES: This action is effective on August 2, 1999, without further 
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 1, 1999. If we 
receive such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register

[[Page 29236]]

informing the public that this rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action should be addressed to Mr. 
Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), at the EPA Region 6 
Office listed below. Reference Docket Number: File Code SIP 1-3-10; NM-
90-05.
    Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for 
public inspection during normal business hours at the following 
locations. Anyone wanting to examine these documents should make an 
appointment with the appropriate office at least two working days in 
advance.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Air Planning Section 
(6PD-L), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
    New Mexico Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau, 1190 St. 
Frances Drive, Room So. 2100, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503.
    Documents which are incorporated by reference are available for 
public inspection at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information 
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. John Crocker, P.E., of the EPA 
Region 6 Air Planning Section at the above address, telephone (214) 
665-7596.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Act, section 128(a) titled--State Boards, requires each SIP to 
contain provisions which ensure that: (1) any board or body which 
approves permits or enforcement orders under the Act shall have at 
least a majority of members who represent the public interest and do 
not derive any significant portion of their income from persons subject 
to permits or enforcement orders under the Act, and (2) any potential 
conflicts of interest by members of such board or body, or the head of 
an executive agency with similar powers, be adequately disclosed.
    The New Mexico Air Quality Control Act (section 74-2-4) authorizes 
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County to locally administer and enforce the 
State Air Quality Control Act by providing for a local air quality 
control program. Thus, State law views Albuquerque/Bernalillo County 
and the remainder of the State of New Mexico as distinct air quality 
control entities. Therefore, each entity is required to submit its own 
SIP revision in order to completely satisfy the requirements of section 
128(a) of the Clean Air Act for the entire State of New Mexico.

A. SIP Call

    On July 19, 1989, EPA issued a SIP call to the Governor of New 
Mexico providing formal notice of finding the SIP to be substantially 
inadequate. The SIP call required New Mexico (i.e., the NMEIB and the 
joint Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Air Quality Board) to take curative 
steps to comply with section 128 of the Act within a one-year time 
period or a corrective Federal Implemention Plan could be imposed to 
remedy the deficiencies.
    Specifically, the SIP call required New Mexico to submit to EPA a 
schedule for the development and submittal of the necessary SIP 
revisions to correct the SIP deficiencies, including any necessary 
legislation needed to satisfy section 128 requirements (which would be 
adopted during the 1990 legislative session).

B. State Submittal

1. State Portion
    In response to the July 1989 SIP call, on October 6, 1989, the 
State of New Mexico sent draft statutory changes of the New Mexico Air 
Quality Control Act (NMAQCA) to EPA for review and comment in 
anticipation of a 30-day legislative session to be held in early 1990. 
These proposed changes were intended to meet the section 128(a)(1) 
requirements of the Act for the NMEIB, by removing permitting and 
enforcement jurisdiction from the Board and placing it under the 
purview of the NMEID Director. This concept is acceptable under Federal 
law. The EPA provided comments on the draft statutory changes on 
December 4, 1989. In February 1990, the New Mexico State Legislature 
passed House Bill 404aa which contained language that satisfied the 
requirements of section 128(a)(1) of the Act. This bill was signed by 
the Governor and became immediately effective on February 28, 1990.
    On April 20, 1990, the Governor submitted a SIP revision to EPA 
addressing the State portion of the State Board requirements. The 
submittal was a copy of enacted House Bill (H.B.) 404aa which amended 
the NMAQCA. This submittal was in response to the July 19, 1989, SIP 
call. House Bill 404aa adopted changes which removed permits and 
enforcement orders from the jurisdiction of the board. In addition, it 
required a majority of the board members to represent the public 
interest, and not derive any significant portion of their income from 
persons subject to (or who appear before the board on) issues related 
to the Act or the NMAQCA.
    After a subsequent review of the SIP revision submittal, EPA 
determined on June 18, 1990, that the April 1990 State submittal was 
incomplete and requested a formal State submittal of the New Mexico 
Conflict of Interest Act and the NMEIB Code of Conduct. Similar 
information was also required for the City of Albuquerque/Bernalillo 
County portion of the State's submittal (e.g., ordinances, and any 
conflict of interest applicable provisions). On July 16, 1990, the 
Governor formally submitted the State's Conflict of Interest Act and 
the NMEIB Code of Conduct as an addendum to the April 1990 submittal to 
meet the section 128(a)(2) requirements of the Act. As indicated in 
EPA's letter dated August 9, 1990, this submittal completed the State's 
portion of the section 128(a) requirements. Under the State's Conflict 
of Interest Act, the members of the board and the NMEID Director are 
required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. The NMEIB 
Code of Conduct prescribes standards of conduct for members of the 
NMEIB for potential conflict of interest situations. The Code is 
consistent with and intended to supplement the requirements of the 
State's Conflict of Interest Act, section 10-16-1 to 10-16-16 NMSA 
1978. The EPA's earlier review of H.B. 404aa determined that it is 
acceptable under Federal law to remove permitting and enforcement 
jurisdiction from the NMEIB and to place it under the purview of the 
NMEID Director.
2. Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Portion
    The initial Governor's SIP revision submittal for the City of 
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County occurred on November 16, 1990, via a 
letter to EPA and contains a SIP narrative and supporting attachments. 
It incorporates amendments to local ordinances correcting the criteria 
by which board members are appointed and also addresses Conflict of 
Interest. Supplemental information was submitted to EPA on December 18, 
1990. The submittal included the following documents:
    a. SIP narrative statement regarding State Boards, including three 
(3) attachments as follows:
    1. City and County Metropolitan Environmental Health Advisory Board 
Ordinances as amended.
    2. City and County Air Quality Control Board Ordinances.
    3. The City Attorney's compilation of materials concerning City and 
County Conflict of Interest, and Code of Conduct.

[[Page 29237]]

    b. Supporting documents which are necessary for processing and 
approving this SIP submittal (e.g., proof of September 9, 1990, legal 
notice of public hearing; and public hearing transcript of October 10, 
1990).
    This submittal was determined by EPA to be incomplete on June 21, 
1991, pending a satisfactory resolution of prior EPA comments on the 
draft SIP supplement pertaining to State Boards by the City of 
Albuquerque's, Air Pollution Control Division. Specifically, these 
comments concerned the belief that critical legal flaws or deficiencies 
may exist, with respect to State Board requirements, in the 
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County addendum SIP revision. Supplemental 
information was submitted to EPA on October 21, 1991. A legal opinion 
by the Albuquerque City Attorney dated November 22, 1991, 
satisfactorily addressed EPA concerns as expressed in the June 21, 1991 
letter. After a review of the addendum SIP revision, supplemental 
information and this legal opinion, EPA determined on December 17, 
1991, that both the State portion and the City of Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County portion of the Governor's submittal were complete.

II. Analysis of State Submission

A. General

    The EPA has reviewed the Governor's submittals (both portions) and 
developed a Technical Support Document (TSD). The TSD concludes that 
the New Mexico Governor's SIP revisions (both portions) meet all of the 
requirements of section 128 of the Act. This TSD is available for 
inspection by interested parties during normal business hours at the 
EPA Region 6 Office.

B. Public Interest Membership

    The EPA received written correspondence dated July 4, 1990, from an 
interested party concerning the eligibility for ``public interest'' 
Board member positions. As indicated in a reply letter dated November 
27, 1990, EPA interprets the New Mexico Air Quality Control Act as 
follows: If a person appears before the Board on any matter(s), and 
that person is not paid for his or her appearance(s), or if he or she 
is paid, and that payment(s) is not a significant portion of his or her 
income, then that person can still qualify to be a public interest 
Board member. The EPA does not read the State statute to preclude 
persons from being eligible for public interest Board member positions 
if they have ever appeared before the Board on any matter(s). The 
disqualifying link is whether that appearance(s) was a paid one and 
whether the payment, if any, was a significant portion of one's annual 
income. The State has agreed with this interpretation as well.
    In subsequent correspondence with the New Mexico Environment 
Department (previously the NMEID) dated March 19, 1993, EPA further 
defined this issue by stating: Persons who are designated to either 
represent nonprofit environmental protection organizations or represent 
municipal and county governments, do not represent the public interest. 
The rationale behind this judgement is that each group could 
potentially pursue their own agenda and thus, would not represent the 
public interest. Specifically, professional public interest advocates 
(e.g., paid representatives) do not qualify for the ``public interest'' 
majority requirements. However, mere membership in the organizations 
would not be disqualifying.
    In February and March 1993, the New Mexico Legislature considered 
H.B. 552 which proposed to increase the size of the Environmental 
Improvement Board from five to seven members. Specifically, the House 
Bill proposed that one new member would represent a non-profit 
environmental protection organization, and the other member would 
represent municipal (and county) governments. On March 2, 1993, EPA 
provided comments on this proposed bill and determined that it would 
throw the NMEIB public interest membership off balance, and if enacted, 
the language would be unapprovable under the Act, section 128. 
Likewise, the New Mexico Environment Department analyzed this bill and 
recommended not adopting the bill on the grounds that it would expose 
the NMEIB to membership composition problems. Subsequently, the New 
Mexico Legislature did not pass the flawed H.B. 552.

C. Procedural Background

    The Act requires States to observe certain procedural requirements 
in developing implementation plans for submission to EPA. Section 
110(a)(2) of the Act provides that each implementation plan submitted 
by a State must be adopted after reasonable notice and public hearing. 
See also section 110(l) of the Act. Also, EPA must determine whether a 
submittal is complete, and therefore warrants further EPA review and 
action (see section 110(k)(1) and 57 FR 13565). The EPA's completeness 
criteria for SIP submittals are set out at 40 CFR part 51, Appendix V 
(1991), as amended by 56 FR 42216 (August 26, 1991). The EPA attempts 
to make completeness determinations within 60 days of receiving a 
submission. However, a submittal is deemed complete by operation of law 
if a completeness determination is not made by EPA six months after 
receipt of the submission.
    Regarding the State portion of the SIP submittal (which includes 
New Mexico H.B. 404aa, and New Mexico Conflict of Interest Act) for 
State Boards, it is EPA's position that a public hearing is not 
required for State legislative statutes. The EPA views the State 
legislative process as fully satisfying the procedural requirements of 
40 CFR 51.102 for adoption and submittal of SIP revisions.
    After providing adequate 30 day public notice, Albuquerque/ 
Bernalillo County held a public hearing on October 10, 1990, to 
entertain public comment on proposed revisions to its portion of the 
SIP submittal regarding State Boards. No adverse public comments were 
received at the public hearing. Following the public hearing and 
consideration of minor public comments, the SIP revision was adopted by 
the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board on October 
10, 1990. The Albuquerque/Bernalillo County portion of the SIP revision 
was then submitted by the Governor to EPA by cover letter dated 
November 16, 1990. Supplemental information was submitted on December 
18, 1990, October 21, 1991, and November 22, 1991.
    The SIP revision was reviewed by EPA to determine completeness 
shortly after its submittal, in accordance with the completeness 
criteria referenced above. A letter dated December 17, 1991, was 
forwarded to the Governor indicating the completeness of the submittal 
and the next steps to be taken in the review process.

III. Final Action

    By this action, EPA is approving revisions to the New Mexico SIP 
regarding State Boards for both the State of New Mexico and for 
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, NM. The SIP revisions were submitted by 
the State to satisfy the Federal mandate, found in section 128 of the 
Act concerning State Board composition and conflict of interest 
provisions. The EPA has reviewed these revisions to the New Mexico SIP 
and is approving them as submitted.
    The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because we 
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse 
comments. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal 
Register publication, we are publishing a

[[Page 29238]]

separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP 
revision if adverse comments are filed. This action will be effective 
on August 2, 1999, without further notice unless we receive adverse 
comment by July 1, 1999.
    If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule 
will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a 
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute 
a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in 
commenting on this action must do so at this time. If no such comments 
are received, the public is advised that this action will be effective 
August 2, 1999, and no further action will be taken on the proposed 
rule.
    The EPA has reviewed this request for revision of the federally-
approved SIP for conformance with the provisions of the 1990 Clean Air 
Act Amendments enacted on November 15, 1990. The EPA has determined 
that this action conforms with those requirements regardless of the 
fact that the submittal preceded the date of enactment. Nothing in this 
action should be construed as permitting or allowing or establishing a 
precedent for any future request for revision to any SIP. Each request 
for revision to the SIP shall be considered separately in light of 
specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in relation 
to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
regulatory action from E.O. 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review.''

B. Executive Order 12875

    Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local or 
tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds 
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those 
governments, or EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by 
consulting, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to provide to the OMB a description 
of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of 
affected State, local and tribal governments, the nature of their 
concerns, copies of any written communications from the governments, 
and a statement supporting the need to issue the regulation. In 
addition, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to develop an effective process 
permitting elected officials and other representatives of state, local, 
and tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the 
development of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded 
mandates.''
    Today's rule does not create a mandate on State, local, or tribal 
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable rules on any of 
these entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 
12875 do not apply to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13045

    Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 
1997), applies to any rule that EPA determines: (1) is ``economically 
significant'' as defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) the environmental 
health or safety risk addressed by the rule has a disproportionate 
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the 
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the 
planned rule on children and explain why the planned regulation is 
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible 
alternatives considered by the Agency.
    The EPA interprets E.O. 13045 as applying only to those regulatory 
actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that the 
analysis required under section 5-501 of the Order has the potential to 
influence the regulation. This final rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 
because it approves a State program.

D. Executive Order 13084

    Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the 
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those 
governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to 
provide to the OMB, in a separately identified section of the preamble 
to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation 
with representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the 
nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue 
the regulation. In addition, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to develop an 
effective process permitting elected officials and other 
representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful 
and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters 
that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.''
    Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
communities of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve 
or impose any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the 
requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., generally 
requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the 
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities 
include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small 
governmental jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals 
under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act do not create any 
new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is 
already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not 
create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the 
Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute Federal 
inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The Act 
forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. See 
Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 
7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

    Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 
signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must prepare a budgetary impact 
statement to accompany any proposed or final rule that includes a 
Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs to State, 
local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to private sector, of 
$100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA must select the most cost-
effective and least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives 
of the rule and is consistent with statutory requirements. Section 203 
requires EPA to establish a plan for informing and advising any small 
governments that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.

[[Page 29239]]

    The EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does 
not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs 
of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments 
in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action 
approves preexisting requirements under State or local law, and imposes 
no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, 
or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this 
action.

G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule can 
not take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This rule is not a ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2). This rule will be effective August 2, 1999.

H. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by August 2, 1999. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, 
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: April 26, 1999.
Jerry Clifford,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation of part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart GG--New Mexico

    2. In section 52.1620(e), the table is amended by adding section 
74-1-4 at the beginning of the table, by revising section 74-2-4, and 
by adding new sections to the table after section 74-2-17.


Sec. 52.1620  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                         EPA Approved New Mexico Statutes in the Current New Mexico SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        State approval/
        State citation               Title/subject      effective date     EPA approval date        Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              NMSA 1978--New Mexico Statutes in the New Mexico SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74-1-4........................  Environmental                 04/20/90  June 1, 1999..........
                                 Improvement Board--
                                 Creation--Organizatio
                                 n.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
*                  *                  *                    *                    *                  *
                                                          *
74-2-4........................  Municipal or County           04/20/90  June 1, 1999..........
                                 Air Quality Control
                                 Board.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
*                  *                  *                    *                    *                  *
                                                          *
Article 16, Sections 10-16-1    New Mexico Conflict of        07/16/90  June 1, 1999..........
 through 10-16-16.               Interest Act.
Article 16, Supplemental......  New Mexico                    07/16/90  June 1, 1999..........
                                 Environmental
                                 Improvement Board
                                 Code of Conduct.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  EPA Approved City of Albuquerque and Bernalillo County Ordinances for State Board Composition and Conflict of
                                              Interest Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Albuquerque, Chapter    Metropolitan                  11/16/90  June 1, 1999..........
 6, Article XVII Sections 6-17-  Environmental Health
 1 to 6-17-3.                    Advisory Board.
Bernalillo County Commission    Metropolitan                  08/05/74  June 1, 1999..........
 Ordinance 302.                  Environmental Health
                                 Advisory Board.
Bernalillo County Commission    Metropolitan                  08/21/90  June 1, 1999..........  Amended
 Ordinance 90-19.                Environmental Health                                            Ordinance 302.
                                 Advisory Board.
City of Albuquerque, Chapter    Joint Air Quality             08/01/89  June 1, 1999..........
 6, Article XVI Sections 6-16-   Control Board
 1 to 6-16-15.                   Ordinance.
Bernalillo County Commission    Joint Air Quality             12/27/88  June 1, 1999..........  Amended
 Ordinance 88-45.                Control Board                                                   Ordinance 84-
                                 Ordinance.                                                      44.
City of Albuquerque Chapter 1,  Public Boards,                07/01/87  June 1, 1999..........
 Article XII Sections 1-12-1     Commissions and
 to 1-12-3.                      Committees.

[[Page 29240]]

 
City of Albuquerque Chapter 2,  Conflict of Interest..        07/01/85  June 1, 1999..........
 Article III Sections 2-3-1 to
 2-3-13.
City of Albuquerque Charter,    Code of Ethics........        04/01/90  June 1, 1999..........
 Article XII.
Bernalillo County Commission    Code of Ethics........        02/05/85  June 1, 1999..........
 Ordinance 85-3.
City of Albuquerque Code of     City Code of Conduct..        02/09/90  June 1, 1999..........
 Conduct.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 99-13379 Filed 5-28-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U