[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Page 29080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-13645]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-99-5014; notice 2]
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; Grant of Application for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (Bridgestone) determined that certain
tires manufactured in 1998 of various sizes and brands are not in full
compliance with 49 CFR 571.119, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 119, ``New pneumatic tires for vehicles other than
passenger cars,'' and has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49
CFR Part 573, ``Defect and Noncompliance Reports.'' Bridgestone also
applied to be exempted from the notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301--``Motor Vehicle Safety'' on the basis that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safely.
Although the applicant stated this was a noncompliance with FMVSS
No. 119, NHTSA considers this to be a noncompliance with Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 109, New pneumatic tires. On March
2, 1999, the agency received a letter from Bridgestone concurring that
the relevant standard is indeed FMVSS No. 109.
Notice of receipt of the application was published, with a 30-day
comment period, on February 15, 1999, in the Federal Register (64 FR
6937). NHTSA received no comments on this application during the 30-day
comment period.
Paragrph S4.3.2 of FMVSS No. 109 requires each tire to be marked in
accordance with Part 574, Tire Identification and Recordkeeping. If a
tire lacks this correct information, it fails to comply with FMVSS No.
109 and is subject to the notification and remedy requirements of
Chapter 301, unless exempted pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) on grounds of inconsequentiality.
On December 12, 1998, Bridgestone produced approximately 1,389
tires with an incorrect date code. The affected tires were marked
incorrectly with a date code of ``509,'' instead of the correct date
code of ``508.'' The tires were manufactured at Bridgestone's Oklahoma
City Plant.
Bridgestone supports its application for inconsequential
noncompliance by stating that all of the tires manufactured in the
affected sizes and brands meet all the agency's requirements, except
the correct date code. The purpose of the date code is to identify a
tire so that, if necessary, the appropriate action can be taken in the
interest of public safety--such as, a safety recall notice.
The agency believes that in the case of a tire labeling
noncompliance, the true measure of its inconsequentiality to motor
vehicle safety is whether the mislabeling would affect the
manufacturer's ability to locate them, if the tires were to be recalled
for a performance-related noncompliance. Bridgestone has stated that it
will include the 509 code in any future recall of tires manufactured in
its Oklahoma City plant during the 50th week of 1998. In addition, the
tires meet all of the agency's safety performance requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that the
applicant has met its burden of persuasion that the noncompliance it
describes is inconsequential to safety. Accordingly, its application is
granted, and the applicant is exempted from providing the notification
of the noncompliance that is required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and from
remedying the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120.
(49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and
501.8)
Issued on: May 25, 1999.
L. Robert Shelton,
Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
[FR Doc. 99-13645 Filed 5-27-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M