[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26876-26880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-12157]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 009-0137a; FRL-6337-8]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California 
State Implementation Plan Revision, Six California Air Pollution 
Control Districts

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the 
California State Implementation Plan. The revisions concern rules from 
the following: Kern County Air Pollution Control District (KCAPCD), 
Lake County Air Quality Management District (LCAQMD), Modoc County Air 
Pollution Control District (MCAPCD), Northern Sierra Air Quality 
Management District (NSAQMD), San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 
Control District (SJVUAPCD), and Ventura County Air Pollution Control 
District (VCAPCD). The rules control particulate matter (PM) emissions 
from open burning, orchard heaters, fuel burning equipment, or 
processes identified by a weight rate throughput. This approval action 
will incorporate these rules into the federally-approved SIP. The 
intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of PM 
in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 
1990 (CAA). Thus, EPA is finalizing the approval of these rules into 
the California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on 
SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air 
quality standards, and plan requirements for attainment and 
nonattainment areas.

DATES: This rule is effective on July 19, 1999 without further notice, 
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comments by June 17, 1999. If EPA 
receives such comments, then it will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take 
effect.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted to Andrew Steckel at the Region 
IX office listed below. Copies of the rules and EPA's evaluation report 
for the rules are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX 
office during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules are 
available for inspection at the following locations:

Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 
94105
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' 
Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.
Kern County Air Pollution Control District, 2700 ``M'' Street, Suite 
290, Bakersfield, CA 93301.
Lake County Air Quality Management District, 883 Lakeport Boulevard, 
Lakeport, CA 95453.
Modoc County Air Pollution Control District, 202 West 4th Street, 
Alturas, CA 96101.
Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District, 540 Searles Avenue, 
Nevada City, CA 95959.
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1990 East 
Gettysburg Street, Fresno, CA 93726.
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 702 County Square 
Drive, Ventura, CA 93003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, Rulemaking Office, (AIR-
4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744-1135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Applicability

    The rules being approved into the California SIP are listed below 
with the date they were adopted or amended by the Districts and the 
date they were submitted to EPA by the California Air Resources Board: 
KCAPCD Rule 409, Fuel Burning Equipment (as amended on May 7, 1998, 
submitted June 23, 1998); LCAQMD Section (Rule) 248.5, Prescribed 
Burning (Definition) (as adopted on December 6, 1988, submitted 
February 7, 1989); LCAQMD Section (Rule) 270, Wildland Vegetation 
Management Burning (Definition) (as adopted on December 6, 1988, 
submitted February 7, 1989); LCAQMD Section (Rule) 640, (Permit 
Exemptions) (as amended on July 15, 1997, submitted March 10, 1998); 
LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1002, (Agencies Authorized to Issue Burn Permits) 
(as amended on March 19, 1996, submitted May 18, 1998); Lake County 
Section (Rule) 1010, (No-Burn Day)(as adopted on June 13, 1989, 
submitted March 26, 1990); LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1350, Burning of 
Standing Tule (as adopted on October 15, 1996, submitted March 10, 
1998); MCAPCD Rule 4.11, Orchard Heaters (as adopted on January 3, 
1989, submitted December 31, 1990); NSAQMD Rule 211, Process Weight per 
Hour (as adopted on September 11, 1991, submitted October 28, 1996); 
SJVUAPCD Rule 4301, Fuel Burning Equipment (as amended on December 17, 
1992, submitted September 28,

[[Page 26877]]

1994); and VCAPCD Rule 56, Open Fires (as amended on March 29, 1994, 
submitted May 24, 1994).

II. Background

    On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of total suspended 
particulate (TSP) nonattainment areas under the provisions of the 1977 
Clean Air Act, that included the Ventura County (Southern Part) and the 
San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (43 FR 8964; 40 CFR 81.305). On July 1, 
1987 (52 FR 24672) EPA replaced the TSP standards with new PM standards 
applying only to PM up to 10 microns in diameter (PM-10). 1 
On November 15, 1990, amendments to the 1977 CAA were enacted (Pub. L. 
101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q). On the date 
of enactment of the 1990 CAA Amendments, PM-10 areas meeting the 
qualifications of section 107(d)(4)(B) of the Act were designated 
nonattainment by operation of law and classified as moderate or serious 
pursuant to section 188(a). Nevada County, Plumas County, and Sierra 
County (which now comprise NSAQMD), Lake County, Modoc County, and 
Ventura County were not among the areas designated nonattainment. The 
present KCAPCD includes an area never designated nonattainment for PM-
10 and a part of Searles Valley, which was designated moderate 
nonattainment for PM-10. On February 8, 1993, EPA classified four 
nonattainment areas as serious nonattainment, including the San Joaquin 
Valley Planning Area, which now comprises the SJVUAPCD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On July 18, 1997 EPA promulgated revised and new standards 
for PM-10 and PM-2.5 (62 FR 38651). EPA has not yet established 
specific plan and control requirements for the revised and new 
standards. This action is part of California's efforts to achieve 
compliance with the 1987 PM-10 standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 189(a) of the CAA requires moderate and above PM-10 
nonattainment areas to adopt reasonably available control measures 
(RACM), including reasonably available control technology (RACT) for 
stationary sources of PM-10. Section 189(b) of the CAA requires serious 
nonattainment areas to adopt best available control measures (BACM) for 
significant sources of PM-10, including best available control 
technology (BACT). Therefore, KCAPCD and SJVUAPCD must meet RACM. 
SJVUAPCD must also adopt BACM. However, EPA is deferring decision on 
the specific BACM requirements until EPA acts on SJVUAPCD's BACM plan 
at a later date.
    In response to section 110(a) and Part D of the Act, the State of 
California submitted many PM-10 rules for incorporation into the 
California SIP, including the rules being acted on in this document. 
This document addresses EPA's direct-final action for the following:
    KCAPCD Rule 409, Fuel Burning Equipment, was amended May 7, 1998, 
submitted by the State of California for incorporation into the SIP on 
June 23, 1998, and found to be complete on August 24, 1998, pursuant to 
EPA's completeness criteria that are set forth in 40 CFR Part 51 
Appendix V 2 and is being finalized for approval into the 
SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990 
(55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA, 
revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LCAQMD Sections (Rules) 248.5, 270, 640, 1010, and 1350 were 
adopted December 6, 1988, December 6, 1988, July 15, 1997, June 13, 
1989, and October 15, 1996, respectively; submitted by the State of 
California for incorporation into the SIP on February 7, 1989, February 
7, 1989, March 10, 1998, March 26, 1990, and March 10, 1998, 
respectively; and found to be complete on May 5, 1989, May 5, 1989, May 
21, 1998, June 20, 1990, and May 21, 1998, respectively.
    LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1002 was amended March 19, 1996, submitted 
May 18, 1998, and found to be complete July 17, 1998.
    MCAPCD Rule 4.11, Orchard Heaters, was adopted January 3, 1989, 
submitted by the State of California for incorporation into the SIP on 
December 31, 1990, and found to be complete on February 28, 1991.
    NSAQMD Rule 211, Process Weight per Hour, was adopted September 11, 
1991, submitted by the State on October 28, 1996, and found to be 
complete on December 19, 1996.
    SJVUAPCD Rule 4301, Fuel Burning Equipment, was amended December 
17, 1992, submitted by the State of California for incorporation into 
the SIP on September 28, 1994, and found to be complete on October 21, 
1994.
    VCAPCD Rule 56, Open Fires was amended March 29, 1994, submitted by 
the State of California for incorporation into the SIP on May 24, 1994, 
and found to be complete on July 14, 1994.
    PM emissions can harm human health and the environment. These rules 
were adopted as part of KCAPCD, LCAQMD, MCAPCD, NSAQMD, SJVUAPCD, and 
VCAPCD efforts to maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standard 
(NAAQS) for TSP/PM-10. The following is EPA's evaluation and final 
action for these rules.

III. EPA Evaluation and Action

    In determining the approvability of a PM-10 rule, EPA must evaluate 
the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA 
regulations, as found in section 110 and part D of the CAA and 40 CFR 
part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 
Implementation Plans). EPA must also ensure that rules are enforceable 
and strengthen or maintain the SIP's control strategy.
    The statutory provisions relating to RACM/RACT and BACM/BACT are 
discussed in EPA's ``General Preamble'', which give the Agency's 
preliminary views on how EPA intends to act on SIPs submitted under 
Title I of the CAA. See 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992), 57 FR 18070 
(April 28, 1992) and 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994). In this rulemaking 
action, EPA is applying these policies to this submittal, taking into 
consideration the specific factual issues presented.
    EPA previously reviewed rules from KCAPCD, LCAQMD, MCAPCD, NSAQMD, 
SJVUAPCD, and VCAPCD and incorporated them into the federally-approved 
SIP pursuant to section 110(k)(3) of the CAA.
    On September 22, 1972 and May 3, 1984, respectively, EPA approved 
into the SIP versions of KCAPCD Rule 407.2, Fuel Burning Equipment--
Combustion Contaminants, and Rule 409, Fuel Burning Equipment--Desert 
Basin. Submitted Rule 409, Fuel Burning Equipment, combines these two 
rules and is equally as stringent. This rule regulates particulate and 
other emissions from fuel burning equipment. EPA has determined that 
submitted Rule 409 meets the requirements of RACM.
    On May 18, 1981, EPA approved into the Nevada County (now part of 
the unified NSAQMD) SIP Rule 211, Process Weight per Hour, the general 
prohibition plus exceptions in paragraphs A.6 and A.7, while 
disapproving the exceptions in paragraphs A.1 through A.5. Paragraphs 
A.1 through A.5 exceptions give specific emission limits to the 
following:
     Portland Cement Kilns--0.30 pounds per ton dry feed.
     Portland Cement Clinker Coolers--0.10 pounds per ton dry 
feed.
     Sewage Sludge Incinerators--1.30 pounds per ton dry sludge 
input.
     Rotary Lime Kilns--0.30 pounds per ton limestone feed.
     Lime Hydrators--0.15 pounds per ton lime feed.
    There is currently no version of NSAQMD Rule 211 in Plumas County 
or Sierra County in the SIP. Submitted NSAQMD Rule 211, Process Weight 
per

[[Page 26878]]

Hour, which contains the general prohibition plus paragraphs A.1 
through A.6., replaces the Nevada County SIP-approved rule. The 
previously disapproved paragraphs A.1 through A.5 are being approved in 
this action, because this is an attainment area and all of the 
exceptions are at least as stringent as New Source Performance 
Standards, and EPA concludes that they will not interfere with 
attainment or any other provision of the CAA.
    There is currently no version of LCAQMD Section (Rule) 248.5, 
Prescribed Burning (Definition), and LCAQMD Section (Rule) 270, 
Wildland Vegetation Management Burning (Definition), in the SIP. 
Section (Rule) 248.5 defines Prescribed Burning. Section (Rule) 270 
defines Wildland Vegetation Management Burning.
    There is currently no version of LCAQMD Section (Rule) 640, (Permit 
Exemptions) in the SIP. This is a new rule (a previous version was not 
SIP-approved) that exempts certain types of burning from the 
requirement to obtain a burn permit.
    On August 4, 1978, EPA approved into the SIP a version of LCAQMD 
Section (Rule) 1002, (Agencies Authorized to Issue Permits). Submitted 
Section (Rule) 1002, replaces the SIP-approved rule and includes the 
following significant changes from the current SIP:
     U.S. Forest Service is deleted as an agency authorized to 
issue burn permits.
     The specific California Division of Forestry and local 
fire protection districts are listed by name.
    There is currently no version of LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1010, (No-
Burn Day) in the SIP. This is a new rule that states that the Air 
Pollution Control Officer shall designate and provide notice of No-Burn 
Days, in order to protect ambient air quality.
    There is currently no version of LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1350, 
Burning of Standing Tule, in the SIP. This is a new rule that regulates 
the burning of standing tule and requires a burn permit.
    There is currently no version of MCAPCD Rule 4.11, Orchard Heaters, 
in the SIP. The submitted rule includes the following provisions:
     Restricts the use of orchard heaters to those approved by 
the California Air Resources Board.
     Limits the emissions to not more than one gram per minute 
of unconsumed solid carbonaceous material.
    On various dates, EPA approved into the SIP versions of Fuel 
Burning Equipment rules for the eight counties that now comprise the 
SJVUAPCD. Submitted Rule 4301, Fuel Burning Equipment, replaces these 
rules and includes no significant changes from the SIP versions from 
the eight counties. Rule 4301 is equally as stringent as similar rules 
in other districts. EPA has determined that submitted Rule 4301 meets 
the requirements of RACM.
    On August 6, 1990, EPA approved into the SIP a version of VCAPCD 
Rule 56, Open Fires. Submitted VCAPCD Rule 56, Open Fires, replaces 
this rule and includes the following significant changes from the 
current SIP:
     Burning is prohibited on Ban Days, which have been 
redefined as days when the ambient ozone concentration is or is 
predicted to exceed the California ozone standard of 0.09 ppm by 
volume.
     Persons who burn agricultural waste are now required to 
notify the District both before and after burning occurs.
    EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they 
are consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. 
Therefore, the following rules are being approved under section 
110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and 
part D:
     KCAPCD Rule 409, Fuel Burning Equipment (submitted June 
23, 1998).
     LCAQMD Section (Rule) 248.5, Prescribed Burning 
(Definition) (submitted February 7, 1989).
     LCAQMD Section (Rule) 270, Wildland Vegetation Management 
Burning (Definition) (submitted February 7, 1989).
     LCAQMD Section (Rule) 640, (Permit Exemptions) (submitted 
March 10, 1998).
     LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1002, (Agencies Authorized to Issue 
Permits) (submitted May 18, 1998).
     LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1010, (No-Burn Day) (submitted March 
26, 1990).
     LCAQMD Section (Rule) 1350, Burning of Standing Tule 
(submitted March 10, 1998).
     MCAPCD Rule 4.11, Orchard Heaters (submitted December 31, 
1990).
     NSAQMD Rule 211, Process Weight per Hour (submitted 
October 28, 1996).
     SJVUAPCD Rule 4301, Fuel Burning Equipment (submitted 
September 28, 1994).
     VCAPCD Rule 56, Open Fires (submitted May 24, 1994).
    A more detailed evaluation can be found in EPA's evaluation reports 
for these rules.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this 
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should 
relevant adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective July 
19, 1999 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant 
adverse comments by June 17, 1999.
    If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a timely 
withdrawal informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All 
public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final 
rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this rule. Any parties interested in commenting on 
this rule should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, 
the public is advised that this rule will be effective on July 19, 1999 
and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, Regulatory 
Planning and Review.

B. Executive Order 12875

    Under Executive Order 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental 
Partnership, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by 
statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local or tribal 
government, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary 
to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those governments, or 
EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by consulting, 
Executive Order 12875 requires EPA to provide to the Office of 
Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
consultation with representatives of affected State, local and tribal 
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written 
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the 
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875 
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected 
officials and other representatives of State, local and tribal 
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development 
of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.'' 
Today's rule does not create a mandate on State, local or tribal 
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these 
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of

[[Page 26879]]

section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 do not apply to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13045

    Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is 
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O. 
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA 
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. 
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate 
the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on 
children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other 
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered 
by the Agency. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does 
not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or 
safety risks.

D. Executive Order 13084

    Under Executive Order 13084, Consultation and Coordination with 
Indian Tribal Governments, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the 
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those 
governments. If EPA complies by consulting, Executive Order 13084 
requires EPA to provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a 
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a 
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with 
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature 
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the 
regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop 
an effective process permitting elected officials and other 
representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful 
and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters 
that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule 
does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian 
tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of 
E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies 
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small 
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental 
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under 
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create 
any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is 
already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not 
create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the 
Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute 
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

    Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; 
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA 
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
    EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of 
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves 
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new 
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or 
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

H. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 19, 1999. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Particulate matter.

    Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the 
Federal Register on July 1, 1982.

    Dated: April 9, 1999.
David P. Howekamp,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(177)(i)(F),

[[Page 26880]]

(179)(i)(F), (182)(i)(F)(2), (197)(i)(D)(2), (199)(i)(D)(4), 
(246)(i)(A)(2), (254)(i)(J), (255)(i)(D), and (256)(i)(C)(2) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (177) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (F) Lake County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rules 248.5 and 270, adopted on December 6, 1988.
* * * * *
    (179) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (F) Lake County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 1010, adopted on June 13, 1989.
* * * * *
    (182) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (F) * * *
    (2) Rule 4.11, adopted on January 3, 1989.
* * * * *
    (197) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) * * *
    (2) Rule 56, adopted on October 22, 1968, as amended on March 29, 
1994.
* * * * *
    (199) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) * * *
    (4) Rule 4301, adopted on May 21, 1992, as amended on December 17, 
1992.
* * * * *
    (246) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (2) Rule 211, adopted on September 11, 1991.
* * * * *
    (254) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (J) Lake County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 640, as amended on July 15, 1997; and Rule 1350, adopted 
on October 15, 1996.
* * * * *
    (255) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) Lake County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 1002, as amended on March 19, 1996.
* * * * *
    (256) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (2) Rule 409, adopted on April 18, 1972, as amended on May 7, 1998.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 99-12157 Filed 5-17-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P