[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 1999)] [Notices] [Pages 25275-25276] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 99-11889] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-827] Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China; Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Amended Antidumping Duty Order in Accordance With Final Court Decision AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Amended Antidumping Duty Order in Accordance With Final Court Decision on Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On February 2, 1999, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a mandate affirming the US Court of International Trade's affirmation of the Department of Commerce's voluntary remand results of the final determination of sales at less than fair value in the antidumping duty investigation of certain cased pencils from the People's Republic of China. As there is now a final and conclusive court decision in this action, we are amending our final determination and our antidumping duty order. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 11, 1999. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy Malmrose or Melani Miller, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, US Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5414 and (202) 482-0116, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 8, 1994, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') published in the Federal Register its final determination of sales at less than fair value (``LTFV'') on certain cased pencils from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') (59 FR 55625). Subsequent to the publication of the Department's final determination, the petitioners and the respondents challenged this determination before the US Court of International Trade (``CIT''). The Department requested a voluntary remand after concluding that it was appropriate to re-open the administrative record for both factual information and argument to allow parties an opportunity to address the issues of the appropriate prices for US basswood and the appropriate methodology for valuing slats and logs. On March 22, 1996, the Department filed its remand determination with the CIT. Following the filing of the Department's remand determination, the CIT, on November 13, 1997, affirmed the Department's remand results in Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association, Pencil Section, et. al. v. United States, 984 F.Supp. 629 (CIT 1997), and upheld the Department on all other challenged aspects of the final determination. Consistent with the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's (``Federal Circuit'') decision in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990), the Department published a ``Notice of Court Decision'' in the Federal Register on December 11, 1997 (62 FR 65243). Pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), this notice ordered the continued suspension of liquidation of any subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption until a final and conclusive decision in the case was reached. In its Notice of Court Decision, the Department also announced that it would instruct the Customs Service to begin suspension of liquidation, effective November 23, 1997, with respect to subject merchandise produced and exported by China First Co. Ltd. (``China First'') pending a final and conclusive court decision in this action. While exports of merchandise produced by China First were originally excluded from the antidumping order, the Department's remand determination found that merchandise exported and produced by China First was, in fact, sold at LTFV. On February 2, 1999, the Federal Circuit issued its mandate affirming its December 11, 1998, judgement in Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association, Pencil Section, et. al. v. United States, Appeal Nos. 98-1178 and 98-1202 (Fed. Cir., December 11, 1998). This December 11 judgement affirmed the CIT's November 13, 1997, decision which upheld the Department's final and remand determinations in all aspects. As there is now a final and conclusive court decision with respect to this proceeding, we are amending our final results of review and antidumping order accordingly. Inclusion in the Application of the Antidumping Duty Order As discussed above and pursuant to the affirmed remand determination, China First is no longer excluded from the antidumping duty order issued in [[Page 25276]] this case (see Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased Pencils from the PRC, 59 FR 66909 (December 28, 1994)) (``Antidumping Duty Order''). Therefore, as noted above, subject merchandise exported by China First, irrespective of the identity of the producer, will be subject to a rate of 8.60 percent. Amendment to Final Determination and Antidumping Order Because there is now a final and conclusive decision in this court proceeding, effective as of the publication date of this notice, the final dumping margins and the PRC country-wide (``all others'') rate are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Manufacturer/producer/exporter percentage ------------------------------------------------------------------------ China First................................................ 8.60 Shanghai Lansheng Corp..................................... 19.36 Shanghai Foreign Trade Corp................................ 11.15 Guangdong Stationery/Three Star Stationery................. 0.00 Guangdong Stationery/all other producers................... 53.65 PRC country-wide rate...................................... 53.65 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The above-listed rate for Shanghai Lansheng Corp. (``Shanghai Lansheng'') will not affect that company's deposit or assessment rates for any segment of this proceeding. Since publication of the LTFV final determination and order, the Department has completed, pursuant to section 751(a) of the Act, an administrative review covering Shanghai Lansheng's entries for the period December 21, 1994, through November 30, 1995. (See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 62 FR 24636 (May 6, 1997) and Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 62 FR 1734 (January 13, 1997) (``1994-1995 Review''). In that review, the Department determined that Shanghai Lansheng was no longer entitled to a separate rate, and its entries for that period will be assessed at the PRC country-wide rate, which is also its cash deposit rate. Therefore, pursuant to our determination in the 1994-1995 Review, we will continue to instruct the Customs Service to collect a cash deposit rate of 53.65 for Shanghai Lansheng. Also, as was noted above, China First is no longer excluded from the antidumping duty order issued in this case. Therefore, the Department will instruct the Customs Service to collect a cash deposit rate of 8.60 percent for China First. Guangdong Stationery/Three Star Stationery continues to be excluded from the antidumping order (see Antidumping Duty Order). In all other cases, the Department will instruct the Customs Service to change the cash deposit requirements in accordance with the above rates. Dated: May 5, 1999. Robert S. LaRussa, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 99-11889 Filed 5-10-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P